Omar Usman – Decisive Deep Dive Introduction and Banana Bread

Omar Usman
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speaker explains that Decisive is a story about making better decisions and acknowledging mistakes as a pattern. They emphasize the importance of understanding the mistake and starting from the beginning, rather than just profits. The speaker discusses issues with the food and pastry industries, including framing processes as should- opens a pastry shop, and emphasizes the need to mitigate and minimize the impact of cognitive bias, emotional bias, and short term emotion through understanding the role of people in opening stores.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:00 --> 00:00:03
			In this video series, I'm going to be
		
00:00:03 --> 00:00:05
			explaining the main points made in the book
		
00:00:05 --> 00:00:08
			Decisive by Chip and Dan Heath. Now, normally,
		
00:00:08 --> 00:00:10
			I share 3 lessons that I learn from
		
00:00:10 --> 00:00:12
			books that I'm reading. In this series, I'll
		
00:00:12 --> 00:00:13
			be doing something a little bit differently. This
		
00:00:13 --> 00:00:15
			will be more of a deep dive. And
		
00:00:15 --> 00:00:16
			so this video series,
		
00:00:16 --> 00:00:18
			I'll be covering the major points made throughout
		
00:00:18 --> 00:00:21
			the book, and accompanying it is a long
		
00:00:21 --> 00:00:23
			write up, which I've linked to in the
		
00:00:23 --> 00:00:24
			description down below.
		
00:00:25 --> 00:00:26
			And that write up has a number of
		
00:00:26 --> 00:00:28
			resources. So it has
		
00:00:28 --> 00:00:30
			PDFs made available by the authors, it's got
		
00:00:30 --> 00:00:32
			videos, podcasts interviews by the authors, things of
		
00:00:32 --> 00:00:35
			that nature, but I've also written out a
		
00:00:35 --> 00:00:37
			summary of the main points and also given
		
00:00:37 --> 00:00:40
			additional resources beyond that so you can go
		
00:00:40 --> 00:00:42
			to learn about these concepts more in detail.
		
00:00:42 --> 00:00:43
			Detail. So it helps to go through that
		
00:00:43 --> 00:00:45
			written guide along with these videos.
		
00:00:46 --> 00:00:48
			Now, Decisive is a book about basically how
		
00:00:48 --> 00:00:50
			to make better decisions. That doesn't sound like
		
00:00:50 --> 00:00:52
			a whole lot, but decision making,
		
00:00:53 --> 00:00:55
			if not, it's perhaps the most important skill
		
00:00:55 --> 00:00:57
			that any leader can have, but it's also
		
00:00:57 --> 00:00:58
			a very underrated
		
00:00:58 --> 00:01:01
			skill. See, decisions shape the trajectory of an
		
00:01:01 --> 00:01:01
			organization.
		
00:01:02 --> 00:01:03
			So if you make the right decision, obviously,
		
00:01:03 --> 00:01:05
			you go down the right path. If you
		
00:01:05 --> 00:01:06
			make a wrong decision, it might take a
		
00:01:06 --> 00:01:07
			long time to recover.
		
00:01:08 --> 00:01:10
			Now the mistakes that most people fall into
		
00:01:10 --> 00:01:12
			is they're either unable to make a decision,
		
00:01:13 --> 00:01:15
			and so they wanna build consensus, they wanna
		
00:01:15 --> 00:01:16
			take a long time, they wanna think about
		
00:01:16 --> 00:01:18
			it, in which case sometimes you lose the
		
00:01:18 --> 00:01:20
			opportunity cost of that decision,
		
00:01:21 --> 00:01:21
			or
		
00:01:22 --> 00:01:24
			they'll give into their emotions and short term
		
00:01:24 --> 00:01:26
			biases. Think about buying a house and how
		
00:01:26 --> 00:01:28
			emotion takes over. Now in this video,
		
00:01:29 --> 00:01:30
			I'm gonna be sharing a story
		
00:01:30 --> 00:01:32
			that the authors of the book sent out
		
00:01:32 --> 00:01:34
			on their email newsletters. It's actually a story
		
00:01:34 --> 00:01:36
			that was left on the cutting room floor.
		
00:01:36 --> 00:01:38
			It didn't make it into the book, but
		
00:01:38 --> 00:01:40
			for me, this story really encapsulates
		
00:01:40 --> 00:01:42
			a lot of the major ideas that are
		
00:01:42 --> 00:01:44
			made that are presented in the book, and
		
00:01:44 --> 00:01:46
			the story goes like this. Let's pretend that
		
00:01:46 --> 00:01:48
			there's a couple called Jim and Pam, and
		
00:01:48 --> 00:01:51
			Jim works in the office, and Pam, she
		
00:01:51 --> 00:01:53
			sends pastries along with Jim to work, you
		
00:01:53 --> 00:01:55
			know, a couple of times a week, and
		
00:01:55 --> 00:01:57
			Pam makes all types of things. She makes
		
00:01:57 --> 00:02:00
			pumpkin bread, banana bread, scones, you know, muffins,
		
00:02:00 --> 00:02:01
			all different types of pastries.
		
00:02:02 --> 00:02:03
			The problem
		
00:02:03 --> 00:02:05
			is, those pastries are low fat and they
		
00:02:05 --> 00:02:07
			taste really bad.
		
00:02:07 --> 00:02:09
			But when Jim comes to work, he puts
		
00:02:09 --> 00:02:11
			the pastries out, and if you've ever been
		
00:02:11 --> 00:02:13
			in an office environment, you know exactly how
		
00:02:13 --> 00:02:15
			it works. There's free food in the bake
		
00:02:15 --> 00:02:18
			in the break room, the email notification goes
		
00:02:18 --> 00:02:20
			out, and everyone gets up. It's an excuse
		
00:02:20 --> 00:02:21
			to get up. It's an excuse to take
		
00:02:21 --> 00:02:23
			a break to see people and obviously to
		
00:02:23 --> 00:02:26
			get some free food. And so the food
		
00:02:26 --> 00:02:29
			disappears within a matter of minutes. Pretty soon,
		
00:02:29 --> 00:02:32
			everyone knows that Jim's wife Pam sends pastries
		
00:02:32 --> 00:02:34
			with him. And so now when they meet
		
00:02:34 --> 00:02:36
			her at a social event for the company
		
00:02:36 --> 00:02:37
			or at a dinner,
		
00:02:37 --> 00:02:39
			in order to be polite, in order to
		
00:02:39 --> 00:02:41
			establish rapport with her, they say, hey Pam,
		
00:02:42 --> 00:02:44
			We love those pastries. Keep them coming. They
		
00:02:44 --> 00:02:46
			taste great. Everyone finishes them very quickly.
		
00:02:47 --> 00:02:49
			And so now after this happens a few
		
00:02:49 --> 00:02:51
			times, Jim and Pam go home and they're
		
00:02:51 --> 00:02:53
			thinking, hey, are we on to something? Are
		
00:02:53 --> 00:02:54
			we sitting on a gold mine? You know,
		
00:02:54 --> 00:02:55
			and Pam's saying, you know, I'm one of
		
00:02:55 --> 00:02:58
			those Masterchef Junior kids and it's always been
		
00:02:58 --> 00:03:00
			my dream to own a pastry shop and,
		
00:03:00 --> 00:03:02
			you know, maybe we're really onto something. Maybe
		
00:03:02 --> 00:03:03
			we should start a business. Maybe we should
		
00:03:03 --> 00:03:05
			quit our jobs and go all in. And
		
00:03:05 --> 00:03:07
			so Jim starts telling people about this idea
		
00:03:07 --> 00:03:09
			that, hey, we might start a pastry business.
		
00:03:10 --> 00:03:11
			And now people are kinda like, oh, okay.
		
00:03:11 --> 00:03:13
			That's nice. Good luck. We wish you the
		
00:03:13 --> 00:03:13
			best.
		
00:03:14 --> 00:03:16
			But no one's gonna stop and say, hey,
		
00:03:16 --> 00:03:18
			Jim. You can't do that.
		
00:03:18 --> 00:03:21
			Those pastries, they taste like cardboard. They're stale.
		
00:03:21 --> 00:03:22
			They taste terrible.
		
00:03:22 --> 00:03:25
			No one's gonna say that. And so now,
		
00:03:25 --> 00:03:27
			Jim and Pam, based on this information that,
		
00:03:27 --> 00:03:28
			hey. Everyone thinks it's a good idea. Everything
		
00:03:29 --> 00:03:31
			everyone thinks that we should do it. Well,
		
00:03:31 --> 00:03:33
			now they start going down that path. Now
		
00:03:33 --> 00:03:35
			immediately, a number of things that are really
		
00:03:35 --> 00:03:37
			obvious jump out at us. Right? We're all
		
00:03:37 --> 00:03:39
			screaming at at them saying no, don't do
		
00:03:39 --> 00:03:41
			this. Now let's look at a couple of
		
00:03:41 --> 00:03:43
			these mistakes in detail. Some are less obvious
		
00:03:43 --> 00:03:44
			than the others.
		
00:03:45 --> 00:03:47
			The first is that they're taking
		
00:03:48 --> 00:03:48
			the particulars
		
00:03:49 --> 00:03:52
			and the vividness of the immediate feedback and
		
00:03:52 --> 00:03:55
			making a broad application of it. So they're
		
00:03:55 --> 00:03:56
			seeing this feedback that, hey,
		
00:03:57 --> 00:03:59
			everyone likes their pastries and they always finish
		
00:03:59 --> 00:04:01
			out, and so they take that to mean
		
00:04:01 --> 00:04:02
			that my pastries must be amazing.
		
00:04:03 --> 00:04:05
			But if they were to zoom out and
		
00:04:05 --> 00:04:06
			look at the bigger picture,
		
00:04:06 --> 00:04:08
			they would see, well, actually,
		
00:04:09 --> 00:04:11
			there's a pattern here. Anytime that there's free
		
00:04:11 --> 00:04:14
			food in the office, it finishes out. It
		
00:04:14 --> 00:04:15
			doesn't matter if it tastes bad, it doesn't
		
00:04:15 --> 00:04:17
			matter if it's stale, it doesn't matter if
		
00:04:17 --> 00:04:18
			it tastes disgusting.
		
00:04:19 --> 00:04:21
			Anytime there's free food in the break room,
		
00:04:21 --> 00:04:23
			it finishes. So they don't see themselves as
		
00:04:23 --> 00:04:24
			part of that pattern,
		
00:04:24 --> 00:04:27
			they see this feedback as validating, well, my
		
00:04:27 --> 00:04:28
			pastries are amazing.
		
00:04:29 --> 00:04:30
			The other thing that they failed to do
		
00:04:30 --> 00:04:34
			was to actually validate and get feedback. And
		
00:04:34 --> 00:04:35
			so it's one thing for people to say
		
00:04:35 --> 00:04:37
			hey, those taste great. It may have been
		
00:04:37 --> 00:04:39
			another thing to come and say okay, we're
		
00:04:39 --> 00:04:42
			selling these for $2 each. And now they
		
00:04:42 --> 00:04:44
			can do a little bit of market research
		
00:04:44 --> 00:04:45
			and just validate.
		
00:04:45 --> 00:04:48
			Are people actually buying it? Is the market
		
00:04:48 --> 00:04:50
			reacting the way that we thought that it
		
00:04:50 --> 00:04:51
			would? If it is, then maybe we can
		
00:04:51 --> 00:04:53
			take a step further, but if not, we
		
00:04:53 --> 00:04:55
			need to go back to the drawing board.
		
00:04:55 --> 00:04:57
			Another thing that they failed to do was
		
00:04:57 --> 00:04:59
			to understand their role, you know, understand what
		
00:04:59 --> 00:05:00
			their true
		
00:05:00 --> 00:05:02
			question or their true issue.
		
00:05:02 --> 00:05:04
			They're framing this as a should we open
		
00:05:04 --> 00:05:07
			a pastry shop or not, and if my
		
00:05:07 --> 00:05:08
			pastries are good, then I should do a
		
00:05:08 --> 00:05:10
			good job, but what they failed to do
		
00:05:10 --> 00:05:12
			was to understand okay, how many people have
		
00:05:12 --> 00:05:13
			made the jump
		
00:05:14 --> 00:05:14
			from,
		
00:05:15 --> 00:05:17
			maybe a passion project into a full time
		
00:05:17 --> 00:05:19
			business, and what steps did it take to
		
00:05:19 --> 00:05:20
			get there? If we do open a small
		
00:05:20 --> 00:05:22
			business, what are the things that we're not
		
00:05:22 --> 00:05:25
			taking into account? How many restaurants for example
		
00:05:25 --> 00:05:27
			open up in a good location but fail?
		
00:05:27 --> 00:05:29
			Do we know how to scout a commercial
		
00:05:29 --> 00:05:31
			location? Do we know the legalities involved with
		
00:05:31 --> 00:05:33
			it? Do we know how much the rent
		
00:05:33 --> 00:05:35
			should be? And once we even do all
		
00:05:35 --> 00:05:37
			that, have we really understood the food business?
		
00:05:37 --> 00:05:39
			Do we know how much inventory is going
		
00:05:39 --> 00:05:41
			to cost? Do we know how much equipment
		
00:05:41 --> 00:05:43
			is going to cost? Do we know how
		
00:05:43 --> 00:05:44
			much payroll and overhead is going to be
		
00:05:44 --> 00:05:46
			and how to calculate all that? Do we
		
00:05:46 --> 00:05:48
			know what our food margins need to be
		
00:05:48 --> 00:05:50
			in order to turn a profit? Do we
		
00:05:50 --> 00:05:51
			know how long we're supposed to wait before
		
00:05:51 --> 00:05:54
			we turn a profit? There's a whole number
		
00:05:54 --> 00:05:55
			of issues that they might not be taking
		
00:05:55 --> 00:05:58
			into account because hey, my pastries are good,
		
00:05:58 --> 00:06:00
			this is what I've dreamt about,
		
00:06:00 --> 00:06:02
			and that's just what I wanna do.
		
00:06:03 --> 00:06:05
			One thing that they could do, and I'm
		
00:06:05 --> 00:06:05
			not saying that
		
00:06:06 --> 00:06:07
			one thing that might happen is we'll say
		
00:06:07 --> 00:06:09
			well okay we look at all this feedback
		
00:06:09 --> 00:06:10
			and say okay well maybe we should stop,
		
00:06:10 --> 00:06:12
			maybe we should pull back, and it's always
		
00:06:12 --> 00:06:14
			kind of one extreme or the other that
		
00:06:14 --> 00:06:16
			either we look at all these issues and
		
00:06:16 --> 00:06:18
			say okay well forget it, that's too much
		
00:06:18 --> 00:06:20
			to figure out, or we wanna go all
		
00:06:20 --> 00:06:22
			in. And one of the things that happens
		
00:06:22 --> 00:06:24
			is that it's kind of the narrative and
		
00:06:24 --> 00:06:26
			the stories that we share particularly in modern
		
00:06:26 --> 00:06:29
			times, and so we always popularize that story
		
00:06:29 --> 00:06:31
			of the person that had that dream since
		
00:06:31 --> 00:06:33
			they were a child of opening a pastry
		
00:06:33 --> 00:06:35
			shop, and they put all their savings into
		
00:06:35 --> 00:06:37
			it, they maxed out their credit cards, they
		
00:06:37 --> 00:06:39
			took out their loans, and they made it.
		
00:06:39 --> 00:06:41
			They followed their dreams, they followed their passion,
		
00:06:41 --> 00:06:43
			they did all that, and we hear those
		
00:06:43 --> 00:06:44
			stories and we think, well, we can do
		
00:06:44 --> 00:06:47
			it too. But we don't seek out
		
00:06:47 --> 00:06:48
			disconfirming
		
00:06:48 --> 00:06:51
			information and that's a huge problem, especially the
		
00:06:51 --> 00:06:53
			time of the internet where we only highlight
		
00:06:53 --> 00:06:56
			success stories. Have we sought out the stories
		
00:06:56 --> 00:06:58
			of the people that went down that same
		
00:06:58 --> 00:07:00
			path but then ended up bankrupt, that failed
		
00:07:00 --> 00:07:01
			that didn't make it,
		
00:07:02 --> 00:07:04
			those aren't fun stories to share, but they
		
00:07:04 --> 00:07:06
			have very relevant lessons
		
00:07:06 --> 00:07:09
			that would be very pertinent in making this
		
00:07:09 --> 00:07:09
			decision.
		
00:07:10 --> 00:07:12
			Well now, okay, so are we supposed to
		
00:07:12 --> 00:07:14
			go all in? Do we go all out?
		
00:07:14 --> 00:07:15
			How do we figure that out?
		
00:07:15 --> 00:07:17
			And that's where you have to have another
		
00:07:17 --> 00:07:19
			element which is to say okay, let's set
		
00:07:19 --> 00:07:21
			a trip wire, and that we will cover
		
00:07:21 --> 00:07:23
			that in a later video in more detail,
		
00:07:23 --> 00:07:25
			but basically let's set an experiment for ourselves.
		
00:07:26 --> 00:07:28
			How much money can we reasonably invest? So
		
00:07:28 --> 00:07:30
			they could have asked themselves, okay, what can
		
00:07:30 --> 00:07:33
			we put in that's not gonna negatively impact
		
00:07:33 --> 00:07:35
			us too much? So they might say, okay,
		
00:07:35 --> 00:07:36
			we can put in $25100
		
00:07:36 --> 00:07:38
			and it's not gonna negatively impact our lives
		
00:07:38 --> 00:07:40
			if we lose all of it.
		
00:07:40 --> 00:07:42
			Now let's based on our projections figure out
		
00:07:42 --> 00:07:44
			how long it might take to break even
		
00:07:44 --> 00:07:45
			or turn a profit. And they say, okay.
		
00:07:46 --> 00:07:47
			Based on what we've done so far, we
		
00:07:47 --> 00:07:49
			think that if we put in $25100
		
00:07:50 --> 00:07:52
			into let's say buying, upgrading our equipment, getting
		
00:07:52 --> 00:07:55
			some additional food supplies, doing some marketing, doing
		
00:07:55 --> 00:07:57
			all these different things, then we should be
		
00:07:57 --> 00:07:59
			able to turn a profit within 6 to
		
00:07:59 --> 00:08:01
			8 months. And so they say okay, let's
		
00:08:01 --> 00:08:02
			give ourselves leeway.
		
00:08:02 --> 00:08:04
			Let's set a reminder on our calendar to
		
00:08:04 --> 00:08:07
			come back after 8 months and see. If
		
00:08:07 --> 00:08:10
			after 8 months we have made back $25100.1,
		
00:08:12 --> 00:08:14
			for us that'll be a successful validation
		
00:08:15 --> 00:08:16
			that we need to put a little bit
		
00:08:16 --> 00:08:18
			more fuel into this, turn up the volume
		
00:08:18 --> 00:08:20
			a little bit, and see how much more
		
00:08:20 --> 00:08:23
			we can accelerate it. But if after 8
		
00:08:23 --> 00:08:25
			months we come back and we've only made
		
00:08:25 --> 00:08:26
			back $2,499.99,
		
00:08:30 --> 00:08:32
			then that will be an indicator to us
		
00:08:32 --> 00:08:33
			that we need to pull the plug on
		
00:08:33 --> 00:08:34
			this project
		
00:08:34 --> 00:08:36
			and not put any more money into it
		
00:08:36 --> 00:08:39
			because we're probably going to lose it based
		
00:08:39 --> 00:08:41
			on what we validated thus far. Now, in
		
00:08:41 --> 00:08:43
			the upcoming videos, I'm going to explain the
		
00:08:43 --> 00:08:45
			RAP framework, and the RAP framework
		
00:08:45 --> 00:08:46
			is a system.
		
00:08:47 --> 00:08:49
			It's a way of trying to mitigate
		
00:08:49 --> 00:08:52
			and minimize the impact of cognitive bias, of
		
00:08:52 --> 00:08:55
			emotional bias, of short term emotion, of all
		
00:08:55 --> 00:08:58
			these different things, and that framework is W
		
00:08:58 --> 00:09:00
			R A P, widen your options,
		
00:09:00 --> 00:09:02
			reality test your assumptions,
		
00:09:02 --> 00:09:04
			attain distance before deciding,
		
00:09:05 --> 00:09:07
			and prepare to be wrong. And So we'll
		
00:09:07 --> 00:09:08
			be going through each one of those in
		
00:09:08 --> 00:09:10
			the next 4 videos. Again, make sure you
		
00:09:10 --> 00:09:13
			check out the deep dive post that's accompanying
		
00:09:13 --> 00:09:15
			these videos, and I'll see you in the
		
00:09:15 --> 00:09:16
			next one. Thanks.