Nouman Ali Khan – Can We Do Tafsir with Our Own Understanding- Q&A

Nouman Ali Khan
AI: Summary ©
The speaker discusses the use of tadGeneration in Islamic language and the importance of providing evidence to support their understanding of the Quran. They emphasize the need for a clear understanding of the Quran and encourage listeners to sign up for resources on YouTube. The speaker also emphasizes the importance of learning the Quran for one's life and offers resources for those interested in it.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:00 --> 00:00:02

They think that's it's one and the same

00:00:02 --> 00:00:02

thing

00:00:02 --> 00:00:04

or you shouldn't be doing it.

00:00:04 --> 00:00:05

Actually the Quran

00:00:06 --> 00:00:08

complains if you don't do tadaqbar.

00:00:23 --> 00:00:25

Tafsir question you say, Aslan. Yes.

00:00:26 --> 00:00:29

So, like, in your tafsir, you mentioned

00:00:29 --> 00:00:30

the meanings,

00:00:31 --> 00:00:33

without the context, you know, what it means,

00:00:34 --> 00:00:36

generally, and then you bring it in,

00:00:36 --> 00:00:39

what it means in istillah in sharia. Right.

00:00:39 --> 00:00:40

So,

00:00:40 --> 00:00:42

you know, some say that it has to

00:00:42 --> 00:00:44

be from the classical tafasir. We can't just

00:00:44 --> 00:00:45

do a tafasir

00:00:46 --> 00:00:46

from our

00:00:47 --> 00:00:49

own understanding or just take the meaning from

00:00:49 --> 00:00:50

the book and then Where did they get

00:00:50 --> 00:00:50

it from?

00:00:51 --> 00:00:53

Not just the the classical of Hasidun get

00:00:53 --> 00:00:55

it from? So they say they they they

00:00:55 --> 00:00:55

get it from the,

00:00:56 --> 00:00:58

the Hadith and No. They don't.

00:00:59 --> 00:01:00

So I mean No. They don't. The question

00:01:00 --> 00:01:02

is The question is Is there a ruling

00:01:02 --> 00:01:04

or a rule or The people who say

00:01:05 --> 00:01:07

you can only say what the classical Mufassir

00:01:07 --> 00:01:08

run have said.

00:01:08 --> 00:01:09

When the classical Mufassir,

00:01:10 --> 00:01:11

who we consider classical Mufassir, when he was

00:01:11 --> 00:01:13

writing it, whose permission did he get?

00:01:16 --> 00:01:16

Do you understand?

00:01:17 --> 00:01:19

Because then you that same logic would have

00:01:19 --> 00:01:21

worked at that time. Hey, you can't say

00:01:21 --> 00:01:22

that. Nobody said it.

00:01:23 --> 00:01:25

You'll find for example Al Qurtubi saying things

00:01:25 --> 00:01:26

that nobody said before him.

00:01:28 --> 00:01:30

Obviously, if somebody already said it before him,

00:01:30 --> 00:01:31

there's no reason for him to write anything.

00:01:32 --> 00:01:33

Do you understand?

00:01:33 --> 00:01:35

When by the time, Yohann Razi writes his

00:01:35 --> 00:01:36

commentary

00:01:36 --> 00:01:38

or Kashaf writes his commentary or even more

00:01:38 --> 00:01:42

contemporary, yibin Ashur rahimawllah or alusir rahimawllah write

00:01:42 --> 00:01:44

their commentary. They're saying brilliant things that have

00:01:44 --> 00:01:45

not been said before.

00:01:45 --> 00:01:47

But, if the idea is you can only

00:01:47 --> 00:01:49

say what has been said before,

00:01:50 --> 00:01:51

then

00:01:51 --> 00:01:54

the Sahaba should never speak because the Prophet

00:01:54 --> 00:01:55

already spoke.

00:01:55 --> 00:01:57

And therefore the Tabari'i should never speak because

00:01:57 --> 00:01:58

the Sahaba already spoke.

00:01:59 --> 00:02:00

Right?

00:02:01 --> 00:02:02

This logic doesn't work.

00:02:02 --> 00:02:04

It's not, it's, it's, it's not an accurate

00:02:04 --> 00:02:07

depiction of what happened in Islamic history. The

00:02:07 --> 00:02:09

issue is there are principles and the principle

00:02:09 --> 00:02:12

is not copy someone else. That's not a

00:02:12 --> 00:02:14

principle. The principle is you have to say

00:02:14 --> 00:02:17

something that is coherent or consistent with the

00:02:17 --> 00:02:17

language.

00:02:18 --> 00:02:20

You have to say something that's consistent with

00:02:20 --> 00:02:20

history

00:02:20 --> 00:02:22

and you have to provide your evidences.

00:02:23 --> 00:02:24

Now you somebody could argue your evidence is

00:02:24 --> 00:02:26

weak or your evidence is strong. But you

00:02:26 --> 00:02:28

can't say, No, your evidence didn't come from

00:02:28 --> 00:02:30

that book. That's why it's not a good

00:02:30 --> 00:02:31

evidence. That's silly.

00:02:32 --> 00:02:33

That's not how

00:02:34 --> 00:02:36

tafseer ever worked. And by the way, my

00:02:36 --> 00:02:38

work is not tafsir.

00:02:39 --> 00:02:40

My work is tadabur.

00:02:40 --> 00:02:42

Actually and there's a big difference between tafsir

00:02:42 --> 00:02:43

and tadabur.

00:02:44 --> 00:02:45

And I I do a lot of tafsir

00:02:45 --> 00:02:47

work, but tafsir is where I rely on

00:02:47 --> 00:02:48

the past.

00:02:48 --> 00:02:50

But tafsir is what's built on top of

00:02:50 --> 00:02:50

tafsir.

00:02:51 --> 00:02:52

I've given lectures, you can find them on

00:02:52 --> 00:02:55

YouTube. The difference between tafsir and tadabur, which

00:02:55 --> 00:02:57

is something most Muslims are not really paying

00:02:57 --> 00:02:58

attention to.

00:02:59 --> 00:03:01

They think that it's one and the same

00:03:01 --> 00:03:03

thing, or you shouldn't be doing it.

00:03:03 --> 00:03:05

Actually the Quran

00:03:05 --> 00:03:07

complains if you don't do tadabur,

00:03:08 --> 00:03:10

from every human being. Every human being should

00:03:10 --> 00:03:12

be doing tadabur of the Quran. Afalaayatadabburullu

00:03:12 --> 00:03:14

Quran Allah didn't say, afalaayatadabburullualamaaquran

00:03:16 --> 00:03:18

He didn't say, Why don't the scholars contemplate

00:03:18 --> 00:03:20

the Quran? He said, Why don't they contemplate

00:03:20 --> 00:03:21

the Quran? Everybody,

00:03:22 --> 00:03:23

everybody like

00:03:23 --> 00:03:26

So, so we've created this narrative that doesn't

00:03:26 --> 00:03:27

have any legs.

00:03:28 --> 00:03:30

Of course we have to base our conclusions

00:03:31 --> 00:03:32

on scholarly

00:03:34 --> 00:03:36

sources. But to say we can only say

00:03:36 --> 00:03:37

what has been said before means the Quran

00:03:37 --> 00:03:39

or has nothing more to offer.

00:03:40 --> 00:03:42

Is anybody willing to say the Quran has

00:03:42 --> 00:03:44

nothing more to offer? Everything that every treasure

00:03:44 --> 00:03:46

that could be extracted from the Quran has

00:03:46 --> 00:03:48

already been extracted, so it's depleted now. Would

00:03:48 --> 00:03:51

be are we okay with saying that?

00:03:52 --> 00:03:53

Then how are we okay with saying only

00:03:53 --> 00:03:55

say what was what was said before?

00:03:56 --> 00:03:59

It's it's it this logic collapses on itself.

00:03:59 --> 00:04:01

I hope you guys enjoyed that video clip.

00:04:01 --> 00:04:03

My team and I have been working tirelessly

00:04:04 --> 00:04:06

to try to create as many resources for

00:04:06 --> 00:04:09

Muslims to give them first steps in understanding

00:04:09 --> 00:04:11

the Quran all the way to the point

00:04:11 --> 00:04:13

where they can have a deep, profound understanding

00:04:13 --> 00:04:14

of the Quran. We are students of the

00:04:14 --> 00:04:16

Quran ourselves, and we want you to be

00:04:16 --> 00:04:18

students of the Quran alongside us. Join us

00:04:18 --> 00:04:20

for this journey on bayinatv.com

00:04:20 --> 00:04:22

where thousands of hours of work have already

00:04:22 --> 00:04:24

been put in. And don't be intimidated. It's

00:04:24 --> 00:04:26

step by step by step so you can

00:04:26 --> 00:04:28

make learning the Quran a part of your

00:04:28 --> 00:04:31

lifestyle. There's lots of stuff available on YouTube,

00:04:31 --> 00:04:32

but it's all over the place. If you

00:04:32 --> 00:04:34

want an organized approach to studying the Quran

00:04:34 --> 00:04:36

beginning to end for yourself, your kids, your

00:04:36 --> 00:04:39

family, and even among peers, that would be

00:04:39 --> 00:04:41

the way to go. Sign up for bayinatv.com.

Share Page