Mohammed Hijab – Response to Telegraph

			Stahma Tina, me so knows that oberlo Ciao, bella. Ciao, bella. Ciao, ciao, ciao Sammartino.
		

			Patrick Sawyer, a senior journalist at the telegraph who produced a piece about me some time ago,
		

			a completely libelous piece where he misrepresents me completely. In fact, forget about just
misrepresenting me he misrepresents the entire situation in Leicester, between the Hindutva and the
Muslim people, let's take a look at what he looks like. Because it's already on the public record.
He's got a an open Twitter account. There's no problems here. And in fact, he was showing pictures
of me as well, in fact, mentioning where I live. I think he lives in Middlesex, London, just to
return the favor to him, since he has tried to expose where I live, no problem. You live in
Middlesex London, I think it is. Anyway, no matter, this individual, will now have to present
		

			himself in a court of law, because he is officially being sued. Now, whether or not he wins the
case, is aside the point, the fact that you decided to misrepresent me in the ways that you have
		

			means now that you will be inconvenienced with a court case.
		

			But what wouldn't be known is that I actually gave you an opportunity to make reasonable
retractions. I recorded the conversation that I had with you in kind. And in that conversation, I
went through piece by piece. What exactly was Miss representative about that article? The first
thing I said to you, as you can hear, or you'll be able to hear is that I have never, and will never
will don't have the time or any kind of inclination to attend. Suppose it anti Jewish protests, the
only ever protests I've attended, or spearheaded, or been a party to our pro Palestinian protests.
And unless in your mind, the two notions are equivalent, then this is nothing but pure
		

			misrepresentation. And in fact, not just that. It's a clear attempt by the media
		

			to employ
		

			this kind of
		

			since seriousness, or to create a culture of sin seriousness
		

			for individuals who are activists for the Palestinian cause, by labeling them with the worst kind of
labels, I have to break it to you. Not only is this unfair,
		

			is it illegal in this country, for you to say something like that, but also, it is something which
now demonstrates your desperation, and the fact that you've lost the argument.
		

			The fact is this. I have had conversations with Jewish people, debates with Jewish people debates
with Zionist people, countless debates, countless debates. And all of them were favorable to me. As
you can see, with the hundreds, actually not hundreds of 1000s I would say 10s of millions of people
who have viewed such debates, I've even produced a book on the matter of Zionist terrorism.
		

			And so off to the public,
		

			have seen this, and millions of people have been affected. And the white, the intellectual white
towel has been thrown in. This is what you have to resort to now, isn't it? You now have to resort
instead of trying to defeat me with facts
		

			as scholarly references and citations. Now it's anti Jewish. Okay.
		

			Even though there are unequivocal statements on this very channel of me speaking against anti
semitism, but let's disregard that not even mentioned that and refer to me as anti Jewish. Does that
do you think you have proven yourself to be victorious? In so doing, or is this a great defeat for
you? And for all I know, you're you are an Italian man.
		

			You're an Italian man, you've got you've got no dog in the fight anyway. But of course, you're
working for the telegraph.
		

			And the Telegraph has its own history.
		

			Secondly, you mentioned other things in the article which I explained to you I've never said you say
he's a self described scholar,
		

			or self proclaimed scholar
		

			I've never made such proclamation. And I explicitly told you on the phone that that was the case you
lied again, and said, Yes, I found on your website, you will not find any such statement on my
website, by you may see this as a point of triviality. But it's not trivial for me, because if
you're a journalist, who's Integris, the point is you're meant to be able to quote things properly.
And if you're incompetent, negligent, foolish, low IQ, to the point where you can't even copy and
paste things properly. Something that year 10 can do a competent year 10 can do forget about that
even a year eight or nine can do in this country than what you're doing as a senior journalists in
		

			something like the telegraph.
		

			Thirdly, he actually started speaking about my relationship with my father.
		

			I want to know why. And he says, I spoke to a close relative. By the way, you couldn't have spoken
to a close relative, because I don't have many close relatives in this country. And in fact, the
ones that I do have in this country, were abroad for the most part. And it's impossible for you to
have such information. In fact, if you had spoken to a close relative, can you please reveal the
source? Because I'm telling you, that is practically operationally impossible. But for you to
include a section on an article related to Hindu Hindutva Muslim tensions about my relationship with
my father not only demonstrates the height, the epitome of desperation, shows the public the extent
		

			to which you
		

			are trying to spit smear, or you're involved in a smear campaign against me.
		

			But now you've become famous.
		

			Yes, not only inconvenienced. You thought you could put up this article, you and Catherine Lau,
let's take a picture of see Catherine Lau for some reason, she is someone who's on this article, she
hasn't got contacted me at all.
		

			She didn't do any of her own checks, checks at all. So she puts her name on an article like this. I
know that she's a feminist, maybe she's agitated by my anti feminist views. Maybe she's agitated by
me somehow or some reason maybe she wants to meet me maybe, maybe she's just trying to get climbed
the you know, the career ladder.
		

			What people will do nowadays to climb a career ladder. What's next, we're going to do next foot
climbing career ladder, try and smear somebody or community not mentioned the fact that there's a
Hindutva problem and less, which is a far right. Radical or organization that if anybody knew, yes,
if anybody knew its roots connected to the RSS, the second chief of which actually praised the
Holocaust, and called for one.
		

			All of that has been conspicuously absent in your article, but you want to focus on Muhammad hijab
and his relationship with his father.
		

			Do you think this is good reporting and good journalism? Is this in the public interest? I don't
think this is in the public interest. But both of you collaborated on this point. So I'm wondering
why Catherine Lau why you put your name to such a thing?
		

			Then you think it would drag you down as well? Did you think there would be no consequence to such a
written piece? Did you think there'll be no legal consequence? No PR consequence, you're dealing
with a public figure who has a viewership, which is comparable to the Telegraph itself?
		

			Are you mad? Did you think there was not going to be a response?
		

			How can you throw stones when you live in a glass house? Your viewership has restricted to the
United Kingdom.
		

			Our viewership has not restricted the United Kingdom. Now you've become famous in all kinds of
countries.
		

			You go to Malaysia somewhere else. Isn't that Patrick? Sour? Isn't that the liar? You go to any Arab
country? Oh, it's not the liar. That tried to defame one of our guys.
		

			Well,
		

			even if you go to Italy, you're a shame to journalism, you are a disgrace to journalism. You're a
disgrace to the Italian P the Italian people, the good Italian people. In fact, you've put us in a
position where you have made the people see the extent to which the new Mavericks, the new outcasts
are in fact, this Muslim population in Britain. Why are you so desperate to paint them out in a bad
way? Because, you know,
		

			you know, that Islam and Islamic civilization is something which you're trying to put your foot on.
It's the sleeping giant where
		

			If it wakes up,
		

			all kinds of things will take place. You're trying your best.
		

			But we another resistance, the legal resistance. And I say this from a
		

			movement perspective. We are now like the farmers in Italy. So now we were you put us in a bad mood,
Patrick south.
		

			And now I'm sorry to say I'm worried for Italy, maybe it's going in a fascistic direction. Hopefully
it's not.
		

			But
		

			we have become the Mavericks. Now, the anti established Mavericks, the Muslim people, and you're
helping us
		

			create this image.
		

			So what I have to say to put us in a good mood
		

			is Stahma Tina, me so and all that oberlo Ciao, bella, Ciao, bella. Ciao, ciao, ciao sama Tina. Miss
on all that ah, it's Roberto live and Vasso or party journaux Portumna. V. Bella. Ciao, bella. Ciao,
bella. Ciao, ciao ciao party Janno port via kms and to d mod the