Mohammed Hijab – Ben Shapiro Debates Student & Fails

Mohammed Hijab
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speaker discusses the lack of knowledge of the Jewish protests and the American Israelii-Al flurry, which they argue is a racist law that only benefits Jewish people. They also argue that return law only benefits Jewish people and that evidence of racism is given. The speaker discusses the history of the conflict between the two speakers and their desire to speak to their spouse.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:05 --> 00:00:54
			Assalamualaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatu How you guys doing? Recently, Ben Shapiro has come to the
United Kingdom has come to London to Cambridge to Oxford, has come to places where hundreds of 1000s
of pro Palestinian marches, and people of the resistance have come out in the streets, from
different backgrounds, from different races, and from different religions, to show solidarity in the
cause, which is a pro Palestinian cause, and anti oppression cause a just cause. And this individual
Ben Shapiro, who's known who I am for a very long time, and he's tried to engage me in scurrying
along from time to time. And he's used as an intellectual human shield, John Jordan Peterson and
		
00:00:54 --> 00:01:23
			Piers Morgan and other people to try and avoid dealing with me directly. This individual in his
usual manner, in his usual manner, has gone to engage the undergrads, the college students, yes. And
in fact, those college students dealt with him in a manner which gave him a run for his money, left
them on the ropes, mashallah, some of the Muslim sisters and some of the other people that
		
00:01:25 --> 00:01:33
			while giving some fantastic points, which she didn't even know how to respond to, what I'm going to
do now is just respond to a couple of those clips,
		
00:01:34 --> 00:02:14
			and show you the ignorance of this man on a topic which we would think he would know more about
considering the emotional the monetary investment that he has made to it. Let's take a look at the
first clip, what response do you have about the great march of return, which is a very well
documented incident, where peacefully Palestinian civilians just marched to their own land that they
have a right to go and return to, but they were killed, shot and murdered in cold blood? What year
are we talking about? Which group are we talking about? I need more specificity. Talking about the
great march of return. I know I'm asking for more specificity, because I'm unaware of all the
		
00:02:14 --> 00:02:46
			details while you're speaking about. So the great march of return is a well documented instance,
where many Palestinians after a tweet by Palestinian encouraged other Palestinians to go march
peacefully back to their land, which land is theirs? What are we talking about? occupied Palestine?
Are you talking about in property Israel? Where are we talking about, like which areas we're talking
about? We're talking about the borders of Palestine. And we're also talking about their right to
return to, there is no right to return. If you're talking about in Palestine for talking about the
land that is inside the 67 borders, there is no right of return to Haifa, there's no right to return
		
00:02:46 --> 00:03:24
			to Tel Aviv there's no right of return to West Jerusalem, the great march of return that was being
referenced by the system was in fact in Gaza. That's where it was. Now, if you know anything about
recent Israeli or Palestinian politics, which I would think you should, having 115 employees in
daily wire, hundreds of millions, not if not billions of pounds, or dollars being spent on the
matter, that one of your researchers would have told you actually, about this situation.
		
00:03:25 --> 00:03:55
			It was in Gaza. And it was a situation where 223 Palestinians were shot dead by the IDF. And this
was without a single rocket being launched by Hamas, or a single shot being fired. This happened in
the years 2018 to 2019. Now you imagine this is the thing that is underreported, if not not
reported,
		
00:03:57 --> 00:04:27
			by the Western media. And then you start asking the question as to why or what happened? When should
the clock start? And you conveniently start the clock on the seventh of October, because that's when
Jewish life was affected. And we've already spoken about the tragic nature of civilian death,
whether it be Jewish life, black man's life, white man's life, yellow man's life, any man's life.
We've already spoken about that at length.
		
00:04:29 --> 00:04:59
			But what I'm going to say to you is the fact that you didn't even know about that this happened in
Gaza. While I know full well, that if 223 Jewish people died, you'd know about that. You'd know the
date, you know the names of the people. You have know the names. And in fact, the aftermath of that
particular situation. showed you the futility of international law. For you see what
		
00:05:00 --> 00:06:00
			happened after that was that the Palestinian Liberation Organization or the PA, I should say, the
Palestinian Authority. They raised the matter to the ICC, the International Criminal Court. As you
may know, there is the ICJ and the ICC. Both of them are international courts. When this matter was
raised to the International Criminal Court, that Trump that then Trump administration issued an
executive order that threatened to freeze the assets of the International Criminal Court, which had
the overall effect of the Palestinians rights being curtailed meaning what meaning this meaning the
people of Gaza before the situation took place in 2023. There are attempting peaceful means to try
		
00:06:00 --> 00:06:51
			and get their voice heard by the international community. And even in those peaceful means, just
like we saw in the Intifada, and other things before it, the cruel and the terroristic IDF killed,
Palestinian civilians, 223 of them. So much so that human rights organizations detailed this in
great detail this matter, the fact that you didn't even know what happened with the great march, you
didn't even know it. We saw it in the clip, you had no idea that this happened. You have no idea
you're ignorant of the situation. Number one, ha, you're ignorant of your own politics, in the
region that you claim to represent. Number two, that you didn't even know the aftermath. You didn't
		
00:06:51 --> 00:06:56
			know where that what happened. Any of those details you have you're ignorant of the situation
		
00:06:58 --> 00:07:12
			shows me full well that only Jewish life matters to people like you. That's the truth. You are a
Zionist and a ethnic supremacist, clearly, because you can't bring it
		
00:07:13 --> 00:07:27
			to condemn the killing of Palestinian civilians by the IDF, Hamas hummus, hummus. This cannot be the
only scapegoat. Because as I mentioned, Hamas did not shoot no
		
00:07:28 --> 00:07:30
			launcher rocket at that time.
		
00:07:31 --> 00:07:49
			So this is the first thing I mentioned. The second thing I'll mention relating to the clip, the
sister was talking about the rate of return. And then he mentioned that well, can you have people go
into a sovereign nation and quote unquote, set up shop? That's what he said,
		
00:07:50 --> 00:08:17
			set up shop? Who are the indigenous? Do you are the indigenous people of that particular land? Are
you claiming, Shapiro, that the only Ha, I'm not even denying that Jewish people may have been
indigenous to the land? My question is, are the only indigenous your claim that the only indigenous
people in that land? are Jewish people is that the claim?
		
00:08:18 --> 00:08:44
			Yanni in all the time for 1000s of millennia? Could it not be said that one single Arab Palestinian
was indigenous to that? Is that your claim? So that's my first point. The second point is which is
the argument that you don't understand, but I will make it clear for you and easy for your heart and
your other people to notice designers friends, because Wallahi optimal biller allow them. Yeah,
		
00:08:45 --> 00:09:17
			you will all understand this argument is, is a thorn in your racist sides. Because we know you're
racist what you said about our people, you agreed with a quote, and I've got it already saved. That
said that they are 100%, terrorist sympathizers or thugs, terrorist sympathizers or thugs that Jews
like to build things Arabs like to bomb crap. And you've already admitted that you said that? Had
you said that about black people? You'd be finished? If I said that about Jews, I'd be canceled. But
you can say about Arabic people because as you think
		
00:09:19 --> 00:09:34
			you can say that about Palestinians. Because as you think the blood and the sanctity and the value
of the Palestinian person has become the cheapest, frankly. But let me continue anyway. Because the
apartheid, yes, apartheid.
		
00:09:36 --> 00:09:42
			Right of Return law indicates without shadow of a doubt
		
00:09:43 --> 00:09:59
			that Israel is an apartheid state. It has racial preferencing. What's the evidence of that? The
evidence of that is as follows. Number one, what is apartheid? Or what are the thresholds that must
be met in order
		
00:10:00 --> 00:10:47
			For an apartheid to happen, the thresholds that must be met in order for an apartheid to happen is
that there's discrimination based on race. And we know that Jewishness is both ethnic and religious
both at the same time. But the right of return law only favors Jewish people. In other words, no
Arabs can come to that land, which means to say that the right of return law fulfills the criterion
required for an apartheid state to be labeled as such. The point is, is that the right of return law
is a racist law. And the fact that you can't understand that, and that you defend that law, and that
you can't condemn that law is ample evidence that you my friend, and I use that term. Actually, I
		
00:10:47 --> 00:10:53
			don't you're retract that you're not my friend. You boy, yeah, are racist.
		
00:10:55 --> 00:10:57
			You are a racist.
		
00:10:59 --> 00:11:01
			I wonder where you get this from.
		
00:11:02 --> 00:11:05
			Because before I say this, I will say this.
		
00:11:06 --> 00:11:39
			You cannot support apartheid laws and right of return laws, without the prerequisite of being a
racist. That's what I claim, you support part apartheid laws. Therefore, you fulfill the
prerequisites of being a racist, you are racist. There's ample evidence that you are racist,
associated with you doesn't condemn you doesn't put you in your place, then maybe they are racist to
or they're afraid of being labeled as anti Semite. Well, now they're going to be labeled as racist,
or racist sympathizer, because you're racist, you're racist.
		
00:11:41 --> 00:12:11
			And we've seen the horrible racism that has taken place in, in the State of Israel, not just against
Arab people who are Muslims and Christians, by the way, but by the Sephardim, Sephardic Jews, by the
Ashkenazis, and by the Ethiopians, and by the Sudanese, and by this one, and by that one, and you
could just read her ad, it's her edits, yes, newspaper articles on the matter. So even the left has
understood that in Israel, there is this racism, and you're part of that.
		
00:12:13 --> 00:12:25
			So don't you dare try. Try it, speak with confidence come and speak to Muslim sisters. That system
was completely correct. Just like people after the that system
		
00:12:27 --> 00:12:39
			will correct as well, when they were making the historical case. And I noticed that you're a liar
when it comes to history. Either you are ignorant of history, just like you're ignorant of this, or
you're a liar.
		
00:12:41 --> 00:12:52
			And of course, if you want to see more information about the historical development, I have done a
video with Abdullah Andalusi. About that, about the entire concise history of Palestine conflict.
		
00:12:53 --> 00:12:56
			With that, I will conclude and I'll say to Ben, I know you're watching me.
		
00:12:58 --> 00:12:59
			I know you're afraid of me.
		
00:13:00 --> 00:13:03
			I know you are. I would be too if I were you.
		
00:13:04 --> 00:13:20
			It would make sense. Here is a man who can destroy me intellectually and physically, in a legal
manner. Here is a man who is more than me in every way. Here is a man who, when I saw an image of
him and a video of him on Piers Morgan show,
		
00:13:22 --> 00:13:23
			I don't know.
		
00:13:24 --> 00:13:25
			I swallowed deeply.
		
00:13:27 --> 00:13:32
			And I'm not gonna make any jokes about that. I saw that there was a gulp that happened.
		
00:13:34 --> 00:13:35
			Here is a man
		
00:13:36 --> 00:13:38
			that if he delivers one slap,
		
00:13:39 --> 00:13:47
			intellectual slap, that I would drop on the floor, quicker than the IDF drops bombs on babies.
		
00:13:50 --> 00:13:51
			I understand why you're not engaging me.
		
00:13:53 --> 00:13:57
			I just want to speak to your wife for a second. Yes, I'm speaking to Ben Shapiro's wife,
		
00:13:58 --> 00:14:03
			Ben Shapiro's wife, whatever your name is. Just know your husband is a coward.
		
00:14:05 --> 00:14:15
			Just know, this is the real man. Look at me. Ben Shapiro's wife, please look at me this is your
husband is a coward. He can't engage me.
		
00:14:16 --> 00:14:19
			And he has no excuse. He can't excuse himself
		
00:14:20 --> 00:14:34
			by saying he's more qualified than I am more famous than I am. gets more numbers than I am higher
have or anything, but he can't engage me. And if he's got any children, Ben Shapiro's children, I
want you to know
		
00:14:35 --> 00:14:37
			that I would never wish for you.
		
00:14:38 --> 00:14:44
			What I'm seeing in Gaza with the Palestinian children, was Salam Alaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh