Jamal Zarabozo – Introduction To The Science Of Hadeeth Part 5

Jamal Zarabozo
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speakers discuss various methods used to address headaches, including formal sessions, class presentations, and headings. They also discuss headings and phrases used in English writing, including "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache," "headache,"

AI: Summary ©

00:00:01 --> 00:00:05
			Anyways, the final takeaways I can give that to
		
00:00:09 --> 00:00:11
			you personally
		
00:00:15 --> 00:00:19
			just think logically but I'm sure if you think logically alone we come up with for
		
00:00:20 --> 00:00:22
			the other boy you cannot think
		
00:00:47 --> 00:00:50
			okay now now we're talking about by the way
		
00:00:53 --> 00:00:53
			formal methods
		
00:00:56 --> 00:00:57
			the
		
00:00:58 --> 00:01:00
			use to differentiate between
		
00:01:09 --> 00:01:13
			This is not the time that you do not take it from
		
00:01:14 --> 00:01:15
			me this is like for example
		
00:01:17 --> 00:01:18
			you might mention a heavy or
		
00:01:20 --> 00:01:22
			someone might come to him and ask a question
		
00:01:30 --> 00:01:36
			if you if you if you will take this headache from him at that time you have to mention it. And it
was something that
		
00:01:38 --> 00:01:40
			he used to have formal ways of passing on
		
00:01:41 --> 00:01:46
			formal sessions in which they used to pass on so this is kind of
		
00:01:47 --> 00:01:51
			like what you mentioned evergreen would not be considered a form of way of
		
00:01:55 --> 00:01:57
			well I'll give you the first one then next year
		
00:01:59 --> 00:02:04
			you can figure out what the next one is for the ship or the
		
00:02:06 --> 00:02:09
			score added to to read to the students
		
00:02:12 --> 00:02:15
			chat with attending a call that
		
00:02:22 --> 00:02:22
			did people
		
00:02:28 --> 00:02:28
			you been reading
		
00:02:31 --> 00:02:36
			any of the students here I'll make it even easier the students here's the heavy from the
		
00:02:38 --> 00:02:38
			get
		
00:02:40 --> 00:02:40
			go
		
00:02:46 --> 00:02:48
			will discuss more in more detail
		
00:02:49 --> 00:02:51
			because I want to see how much you can get logically
		
00:02:53 --> 00:02:54
			the only one you can Good luck
		
00:02:56 --> 00:02:56
			to
		
00:02:57 --> 00:02:58
			have any
		
00:03:01 --> 00:03:02
			writing is
		
00:03:08 --> 00:03:09
			pretty hot and we've been
		
00:03:11 --> 00:03:12
			doing it
		
00:03:18 --> 00:03:20
			not quite that that's not quite healthy. Is
		
00:03:31 --> 00:03:35
			that a formal way of putting it like if you're right handed to someone?
		
00:03:38 --> 00:03:40
			Just want to see how many have come up with what
		
00:03:42 --> 00:03:43
			the no one has written.
		
00:03:47 --> 00:03:49
			from student to teacher like what
		
00:03:55 --> 00:03:59
			this is the students read the teachers heading back to the teacher
		
00:04:04 --> 00:04:05
			what would you call it?
		
00:04:10 --> 00:04:11
			also has another name.
		
00:04:24 --> 00:04:25
			Everybody
		
00:04:27 --> 00:04:29
			is one of the students.
		
00:04:32 --> 00:04:33
			I
		
00:04:37 --> 00:04:38
			just don't see how many
		
00:04:40 --> 00:04:41
			they are reading from a book.
		
00:04:50 --> 00:04:52
			One of them is not acceptable at all.
		
00:04:57 --> 00:04:58
			Any other agenda
		
00:05:00 --> 00:05:00
			Good,
		
00:05:03 --> 00:05:03
			Jim
		
00:05:09 --> 00:05:09
			is fine.
		
00:05:11 --> 00:05:12
			Fine.
		
00:05:32 --> 00:05:33
			What's up this right now?
		
00:05:35 --> 00:05:39
			Each one of them. By the way, we put on the board which one you think
		
00:05:40 --> 00:05:41
			is the strong?
		
00:05:47 --> 00:05:48
			everyone agree with that
		
00:05:55 --> 00:05:55
			song
		
00:06:07 --> 00:06:08
			somebody said
		
00:06:09 --> 00:06:10
			you're missing
		
00:06:12 --> 00:06:15
			some more more details
		
00:06:20 --> 00:06:21
			of Islam.
		
00:06:23 --> 00:06:26
			And the early years of December's was the most common.
		
00:06:32 --> 00:06:36
			Whereas the set used to read that either he was really heavy from his memory,
		
00:06:37 --> 00:06:39
			or he would read it from his books.
		
00:06:41 --> 00:06:42
			He has books that he read
		
00:06:44 --> 00:06:45
			to the students.
		
00:06:48 --> 00:06:49
			Now
		
00:06:52 --> 00:06:54
			we're going to get to something,
		
00:06:55 --> 00:06:58
			we're going to get to a couple which were very uncommon in early years, but
		
00:07:02 --> 00:07:07
			they were not narrowed like 15 to 20, usually, maybe three or four hours a night.
		
00:07:14 --> 00:07:15
			And the student takes it and learns it.
		
00:07:18 --> 00:07:21
			If I give you 30 headings right now, unless you'd like to
		
00:07:25 --> 00:07:27
			put, I'm talking about now with the early years
		
00:07:29 --> 00:07:30
			and also in the
		
00:07:32 --> 00:07:35
			sometimes the shed would read it
		
00:07:36 --> 00:07:37
			from the students books,
		
00:07:39 --> 00:07:39
			also, okay.
		
00:07:42 --> 00:07:43
			And he recorded it.
		
00:07:44 --> 00:07:47
			And the next day he comes and he reads his head from your book.
		
00:07:51 --> 00:07:54
			Now this is this led to a very good way of testing the
		
00:07:55 --> 00:07:56
			the ship
		
00:07:57 --> 00:08:00
			How could you test the ship? What would you do?
		
00:08:04 --> 00:08:10
			Exactly what he said, he said something different, you're gonna notice it and you said, This isn't
on they didn't say that. So
		
00:08:13 --> 00:08:16
			what they used to do was put at ease when sizes were not too heavy.
		
00:08:18 --> 00:08:21
			So, we just read those headings without saying anything you know, any
		
00:08:24 --> 00:08:26
			kind of distinguishes it from other headings.
		
00:08:35 --> 00:08:36
			When you when you
		
00:08:39 --> 00:08:41
			when you read there are
		
00:08:42 --> 00:08:43
			each type of
		
00:08:44 --> 00:08:48
			each matter each way of getting paid leads to certain way of when you commit to
		
00:08:50 --> 00:08:51
			a certain way.
		
00:08:54 --> 00:08:58
			In other words, if I heard the heavy through seminar I heard
		
00:08:59 --> 00:09:00
			then when I narrated like
		
00:09:01 --> 00:09:06
			I should use a certain form of certain words, that tells everybody I heard is gruesome.
		
00:09:08 --> 00:09:08
			Or in general
		
00:09:11 --> 00:09:15
			there's a few terms that you could use the most obvious thing
		
00:09:19 --> 00:09:20
			most obvious the summit
		
00:09:22 --> 00:09:26
			summit, though can only be used in the case of summer semester meeting hackers.
		
00:09:31 --> 00:09:32
			What else may you
		
00:09:33 --> 00:09:35
			definitely use has enough words.
		
00:09:43 --> 00:09:44
			Yes, you may be
		
00:09:49 --> 00:09:49
			reading.
		
00:09:50 --> 00:09:52
			He said that in the previous lecture that
		
00:09:55 --> 00:09:55
			actually read the
		
00:09:57 --> 00:09:57
			book
		
00:09:59 --> 00:09:59
			or the ship
		
00:10:00 --> 00:10:00
			read some books.
		
00:10:04 --> 00:10:06
			I read my book to you,
		
00:10:07 --> 00:10:08
			then you can
		
00:10:17 --> 00:10:17
			directly
		
00:10:19 --> 00:10:19
			read
		
00:10:24 --> 00:10:25
			key linguistically only when
		
00:10:28 --> 00:10:30
			you say somebody said something doesn't answer that you heard it
		
00:10:32 --> 00:10:33
			correctly.
		
00:10:35 --> 00:10:38
			If you never know, Hey, can I say all of
		
00:10:42 --> 00:10:43
			you
		
00:10:45 --> 00:10:47
			permissible to use the Prophet
		
00:10:53 --> 00:10:53
			Mohammed?
		
00:11:06 --> 00:11:09
			Okay, I heard it from
		
00:11:11 --> 00:11:14
			you read that to me. Can I say column?
		
00:11:15 --> 00:11:19
			I can't see it right. But this is not proper to see.
		
00:11:20 --> 00:11:21
			Why is it not property?
		
00:11:25 --> 00:11:26
			What's the whole point of this?
		
00:11:30 --> 00:11:32
			What is the purpose is because
		
00:11:33 --> 00:11:34
			when the second
		
00:11:36 --> 00:11:38
			one just physically conveyed
		
00:11:42 --> 00:11:46
			there's a headache. Okay, I heard this from Mohammed,
		
00:12:04 --> 00:12:04
			the English
		
00:12:06 --> 00:12:06
			game.
		
00:12:10 --> 00:12:13
			linguistics according to the language, if I heard any form
		
00:12:14 --> 00:12:15
			of unethical
		
00:12:16 --> 00:12:17
			there's nothing wrong.
		
00:12:18 --> 00:12:25
			But the police would say yes, there's something wrong. Because this can be used for somebody is
hiding.
		
00:12:27 --> 00:12:35
			Exactly. Because when you say Paula, you're not giving enough information about how your birthday.
So if you heard us throw some out, you should not just say
		
00:12:49 --> 00:12:54
			in other words, I could have heard it from from hundreds or something. Yes.
		
00:12:55 --> 00:12:57
			For most of us went all the way around the room.
		
00:12:58 --> 00:12:58
			So when I said
		
00:13:00 --> 00:13:03
			there's no way to know how I got either I heard it directly I didn't hear
		
00:13:05 --> 00:13:07
			so they want to be more specific.
		
00:13:10 --> 00:13:10
			You
		
00:13:14 --> 00:13:20
			heard it from him if you if you if you did not hear through some and then your letter.
		
00:13:24 --> 00:13:25
			Also, what else?
		
00:13:33 --> 00:13:33
			What else?
		
00:13:37 --> 00:13:38
			Brisbane
		
00:14:02 --> 00:14:04
			assumed is a chain and
		
00:14:06 --> 00:14:08
			you might have a chain. That
		
00:14:10 --> 00:14:12
			means that you might have
		
00:14:14 --> 00:14:14
			the middle.
		
00:14:15 --> 00:14:17
			But it's a mess. Mohammed.
		
00:14:21 --> 00:14:28
			Mohammed, this means I heard it directly from Mohammed and I heard it through some app. He read it
to us in Arabic because
		
00:14:31 --> 00:14:31
			what do you think?
		
00:14:34 --> 00:14:34
			But
		
00:14:36 --> 00:14:36
			not
		
00:14:39 --> 00:14:41
			specified? usages?
		
00:14:43 --> 00:14:44
			Usually in every semester, Mohammed
		
00:14:46 --> 00:14:47
			must have heard from him.
		
00:14:48 --> 00:14:57
			He's confused. So the same will happen. Same with that button. Okay, there's another term that may
be used. It was it was that's the other term.
		
00:15:00 --> 00:15:04
			was born with a sermon was used in an earlier generation
		
00:15:07 --> 00:15:09
			before the Tamil heritage was finalized.
		
00:15:11 --> 00:15:12
			What's the problem with this one?
		
00:15:18 --> 00:15:19
			It doesn't say how we
		
00:15:20 --> 00:15:24
			protect nowadays, there's still people who write, and they write books like they take them
		
00:15:30 --> 00:15:33
			over. So it is not preferred to use this person.
		
00:15:38 --> 00:15:41
			Some of the some of the LMR.
		
00:15:46 --> 00:15:47
			There's also you can also see
		
00:15:48 --> 00:15:49
			the difference now,
		
00:15:51 --> 00:15:54
			although it's not there, but you may say,
		
00:15:58 --> 00:15:59
			this is okay.
		
00:16:01 --> 00:16:02
			because it implies
		
00:16:17 --> 00:16:22
			I was the one who blamed the way that headache is transmitted, although he said
		
00:16:23 --> 00:16:25
			that first one is the one who's blind.
		
00:16:28 --> 00:16:33
			And then also kind of it also might imply that directly here
		
00:16:36 --> 00:16:40
			all of these, for example, if you say semester, Mohammed, many times
		
00:16:41 --> 00:16:42
			I heard Mohammed say,
		
00:16:44 --> 00:16:46
			it's not the same thing as same column
		
00:16:47 --> 00:16:49
			as the way of receiving the transmission.
		
00:16:52 --> 00:16:52
			The world
		
00:16:54 --> 00:16:55
			has stopped someone
		
00:17:00 --> 00:17:03
			from no notice continuing to know.
		
00:17:09 --> 00:17:09
			He
		
00:17:10 --> 00:17:14
			has some headaches and also medically out of the Father.
		
00:17:21 --> 00:17:23
			Especially folks that still continuing with books,
		
00:17:24 --> 00:17:25
			especially
		
00:17:27 --> 00:17:34
			some scholars have already differentiated bought enough something just enough for some are but you
may not use a button
		
00:17:36 --> 00:17:38
			they go into some great detail.
		
00:17:46 --> 00:17:47
			Next,
		
00:17:48 --> 00:17:52
			is considered the strongest way of government headed by most of the
		
00:17:58 --> 00:18:00
			next come up
		
00:18:04 --> 00:18:04
			have an English
		
00:18:18 --> 00:18:20
			as an English comes from.
		
00:18:28 --> 00:18:28
			Anyway,
		
00:18:38 --> 00:18:41
			this one begin, not begin at the
		
00:18:43 --> 00:18:44
			beginning of the second century
		
00:18:46 --> 00:18:49
			is this one who was was when this one was most popular.
		
00:18:50 --> 00:18:55
			But it also existed before, before that one of the domain
		
00:18:56 --> 00:18:57
			name is the machine.
		
00:18:58 --> 00:19:07
			He said I used to record the head even over data. And then after I recorded them, I used to go back
to him and read them to him to make sure they're correct.
		
00:19:09 --> 00:19:09
			By the way,
		
00:19:13 --> 00:19:17
			example and also some apps that I use to record the headaches
		
00:19:20 --> 00:19:22
			and then after he takes the headache, he goes back
		
00:19:23 --> 00:19:28
			and checks to make sure that they are correct. So it did exist before but
		
00:19:29 --> 00:19:33
			and it became most popular around the beginning of the second century 100 years
		
00:19:34 --> 00:19:34
			after
		
00:19:36 --> 00:19:37
			and this is what again,
		
00:19:43 --> 00:19:46
			what is this process described? What is it
		
00:19:48 --> 00:19:50
			now I mean, what is it exactly what is happening
		
00:19:55 --> 00:19:57
			in the future reads to the student right this one
		
00:19:59 --> 00:20:00
			student three
		
00:20:00 --> 00:20:03
			Back to the teacher. And usually what they used to do
		
00:20:04 --> 00:20:11
			is the teacher gives the students his book and he reads them back to the teacher. And also now
there's another way to test the teacher.
		
00:20:16 --> 00:20:19
			Exactly. Okay. Another way of
		
00:20:20 --> 00:20:22
			you retire habits which are not in this book,
		
00:20:23 --> 00:20:25
			yet, if he doesn't notice them, what does that mean?
		
00:20:26 --> 00:20:26
			It
		
00:20:27 --> 00:20:31
			means any better getting old.
		
00:20:32 --> 00:20:34
			What do you do also, by the way, you have the,
		
00:20:36 --> 00:20:37
			after the Chinese, they put a server.
		
00:20:39 --> 00:20:42
			Every time you read the headings to the ship, you put a line through the circle.
		
00:20:44 --> 00:20:48
			So we found many manuscripts having many, many lines.
		
00:20:49 --> 00:20:52
			Circle, meaning there is many, many senses.
		
00:20:55 --> 00:20:57
			always the case too much.
		
00:21:03 --> 00:21:07
			By the way, with respect to some at one point, I forgot to mention,
		
00:21:08 --> 00:21:09
			I think it'll come up later
		
00:21:11 --> 00:21:16
			about if someone has never any idea, is it permissible to record his heaviest wealth.
		
00:21:20 --> 00:21:23
			And should we accept the idea that someone who records while listening to him
		
00:21:27 --> 00:21:28
			because there is a chance that he has something
		
00:21:31 --> 00:21:32
			he wasn't polite enough
		
00:21:34 --> 00:21:36
			to see any of the details.
		
00:21:37 --> 00:21:43
			And it went to defend it, the shaft is really heavy from the person who's writing it means what
		
00:21:45 --> 00:21:47
			was hopefully listening someone.
		
00:21:48 --> 00:21:51
			And he was completely concentrating on listening.
		
00:21:53 --> 00:21:59
			So there was a debate whether or not we should accept the heavy for those people who record while
listening to him.
		
00:22:00 --> 00:22:02
			So it's not that I'm missing something.
		
00:22:05 --> 00:22:16
			What they used to do usually is was the ship is reading the head if they have one student to write a
little bit fast. And he writes for everybody. And they want to make sure he doesn't make him.
		
00:22:17 --> 00:22:23
			And then after the session is over, they borrow the coffee, and they recorded themselves.
		
00:22:24 --> 00:22:28
			So the point was that they tried to do their best to concentrate on what the
		
00:22:30 --> 00:22:30
			one thing
		
00:22:32 --> 00:22:32
			was.
		
00:22:34 --> 00:22:39
			That for example, if I'm the ship, I'm reading headings, from my book, you'll be reading
		
00:22:41 --> 00:22:44
			this will make sure you're not making any mistakes. The rest will just be listening.
		
00:22:46 --> 00:22:48
			That after the session, they'll take your copy and copy
		
00:22:53 --> 00:22:55
			it to the people who are looking for.
		
00:22:59 --> 00:23:02
			But the shift has been very slow matter.
		
00:23:07 --> 00:23:11
			Earlier, let me use the word radical.
		
00:23:13 --> 00:23:13
			I'm wondering,
		
00:23:15 --> 00:23:16
			is there a risk to lose?
		
00:23:17 --> 00:23:20
			Because of these count very strict criteria?
		
00:23:23 --> 00:23:24
			I mean,
		
00:23:26 --> 00:23:29
			theoretically, there might be, but as we talked about before, I
		
00:23:30 --> 00:23:34
			promise to preserve the signal. So we know that the jello
		
00:23:40 --> 00:23:43
			pretty much because the baby
		
00:23:55 --> 00:23:56
			and the lady later on
		
00:24:05 --> 00:24:06
			as the recording
		
00:24:16 --> 00:24:18
			know some what it was complicated.
		
00:24:26 --> 00:24:34
			For example, if we do all these things, and I'm the chef, and I give me two or three that we can
edit and say we're still doing all these things.
		
00:24:35 --> 00:24:36
			But it's still possible.
		
00:24:37 --> 00:24:38
			But anyway, we'll discuss
		
00:24:40 --> 00:24:40
			much, much
		
00:24:46 --> 00:24:47
			more restrictions in
		
00:24:49 --> 00:24:50
			many ways to make sure
		
00:24:53 --> 00:24:54
			yeah.
		
00:24:55 --> 00:24:57
			You said that movie those good
		
00:25:00 --> 00:25:03
			Post is not only one way. So we can use this
		
00:25:05 --> 00:25:07
			many ways to make sure that
		
00:25:11 --> 00:25:12
			they may not
		
00:25:15 --> 00:25:15
			watch.
		
00:25:19 --> 00:25:19
			I can watch.
		
00:25:21 --> 00:25:22
			But there is
		
00:25:23 --> 00:25:36
			one exception to this with respect to many of the habits, that one day when they were about to die,
they were afraid that they were they were not passing on the knowledge that they had before they
died, many of them used to marry more any
		
00:25:37 --> 00:25:39
			sure that the knowledge that they have
		
00:25:47 --> 00:25:48
			between these things?
		
00:25:58 --> 00:26:05
			Some people say whether 334?
		
00:26:10 --> 00:26:11
			Or
		
00:26:14 --> 00:26:17
			like, why would someone say this is stronger than it?
		
00:26:23 --> 00:26:24
			Could be good?
		
00:26:28 --> 00:26:28
			Yeah.
		
00:26:30 --> 00:26:32
			They couldn't from the teacher and the
		
00:26:37 --> 00:26:38
			teacher.
		
00:26:39 --> 00:26:45
			So what does it mean the student is reading to the ship, while the students is reading to the ship,
the ship.
		
00:26:46 --> 00:26:47
			Mine
		
00:26:49 --> 00:26:55
			concentrate on that doesn't have to worry about reading more about anything, you can just
concentrate on that.
		
00:27:03 --> 00:27:06
			area. So the students is right there does not from A
		
00:27:07 --> 00:27:08
			to B, this
		
00:27:14 --> 00:27:19
			is this one is longer, or this one where the majority opinion is strong.
		
00:27:21 --> 00:27:23
			Now, if you're here heading this way,
		
00:27:26 --> 00:27:27
			how could you say when you're
		
00:27:31 --> 00:27:31
			let's say like
		
00:27:39 --> 00:27:40
			this,
		
00:27:41 --> 00:27:49
			and the rest of us are in the class. So India is reading headed to adolescence. But obviously it has
read the heading to adolescence.
		
00:27:50 --> 00:27:53
			And he said after head it was me.
		
00:27:58 --> 00:28:05
			So yes, is reading happy to oblige. We're all in the class. Now I want to narrate
		
00:28:20 --> 00:28:21
			last semester was out.
		
00:28:24 --> 00:28:25
			How would you say
		
00:28:42 --> 00:28:48
			so in other words, can you say out loud enough? what you meant mentioned daddy as was raised with
him.
		
00:28:50 --> 00:28:51
			You don't just accept the norm.
		
00:28:55 --> 00:28:56
			But was the word but it
		
00:29:11 --> 00:29:11
			doesn't have to.
		
00:29:18 --> 00:29:19
			You don't mention the one who's read.
		
00:29:28 --> 00:29:32
			But So the important thing is when you're narrating or whenever
		
00:29:34 --> 00:29:34
			you should admit
		
00:29:38 --> 00:29:40
			this is called send love.
		
00:29:44 --> 00:29:46
			That's also when the rest of by the way.
		
00:29:47 --> 00:29:52
			What do you heard is the rock again, he will be alive, all of his head it will be rejected.
		
00:29:53 --> 00:29:53
			But
		
00:29:55 --> 00:29:59
			now just to make some final points about these two in particular, isn't this
		
00:30:00 --> 00:30:00
			two most important
		
00:30:04 --> 00:30:11
			number one, regardless of which way is being done, where there's any broken or
		
00:30:15 --> 00:30:15
			broken?
		
00:30:17 --> 00:30:20
			Can you hear me through some out throw gras or
		
00:30:27 --> 00:30:29
			broken? broke me that has no money?
		
00:30:33 --> 00:30:36
			Did I hear directly from the other link?
		
00:30:41 --> 00:30:49
			Okay, so the first thing, the important thing is that these two are both unbroke. Are they any the
chain is unbroken if these are and the
		
00:30:55 --> 00:30:55
			next one is
		
00:31:00 --> 00:31:06
			i'm saying is that if you hear if you see a headache, and it says colon, and then it says the
medical plan.
		
00:31:09 --> 00:31:13
			My question is, if you look at that part of the chain, with the broken arm broke,
		
00:31:15 --> 00:31:18
			and broken because the person heard it directly from that
		
00:31:19 --> 00:31:20
			was the same of if that had
		
00:31:27 --> 00:31:27
			been
		
00:31:28 --> 00:31:29
			the question who
		
00:31:30 --> 00:31:32
			didn't you say? Two tags
		
00:31:35 --> 00:31:41
			is reading from this book. Students reading from chases book, or Chase is reading from a student's
book.
		
00:31:42 --> 00:31:48
			Either either the student is reading from the book, or the students is reading it from his own
		
00:31:52 --> 00:31:54
			case it has to be read to the ship.
		
00:31:55 --> 00:31:56
			Okay, the second one
		
00:31:57 --> 00:32:02
			is in it's stronger than semantic because it's by definition plus an actress for
		
00:32:03 --> 00:32:10
			your book as a student. Well, then what you're saying is that his arguments are not together
stronger than the math.
		
00:32:11 --> 00:32:14
			Yeah, I mean, not to distinguish the second kind of
		
00:32:17 --> 00:32:17
			book,
		
00:32:18 --> 00:32:22
			you're, you're assuming that his book was read to the shift, we're taking
		
00:32:24 --> 00:32:28
			my book of your heavy and I may have copies for him. Now I'm reading it to
		
00:32:30 --> 00:32:31
			myself I never had
		
00:32:46 --> 00:32:46
			was
		
00:32:48 --> 00:32:56
			important. It began to be very popular around the beginning of the why, why? Why? Why was it a mess
of us? Yeah. Because
		
00:33:00 --> 00:33:02
			I mean, you have meaning in order to
		
00:33:03 --> 00:33:04
			check.
		
00:33:06 --> 00:33:11
			I want to read some headings. You say, Okay, here's my book. Take it read it to me.
		
00:33:12 --> 00:33:17
			So you have a book, okay. You gave me your book of headings. I never heard these headings from you
before.
		
00:33:21 --> 00:33:22
			Didn't place in that
		
00:33:29 --> 00:33:30
			respect.
		
00:33:34 --> 00:33:36
			There's many questions that the
		
00:33:37 --> 00:33:38
			scholars have. It used to
		
00:33:39 --> 00:33:44
			ask and especially with respect to these, sometimes the gathering would be quite large.
		
00:33:46 --> 00:33:48
			Obviously, this was before the microphone.
		
00:33:49 --> 00:33:53
			When the gathering was quite large, how did they get the people in the back to here with the ship?
		
00:33:59 --> 00:33:59
			What are they called?
		
00:34:31 --> 00:34:32
			asked to do?
		
00:34:35 --> 00:34:35
			That
		
00:34:38 --> 00:34:38
			someone who
		
00:34:39 --> 00:34:40
			probably
		
00:34:42 --> 00:34:42
			is in it
		
00:34:46 --> 00:34:51
			because he was asked to start making less and
		
00:34:53 --> 00:34:58
			here's the question and then go back to our short Yeah.
		
00:35:01 --> 00:35:02
			The cameraman though
		
00:35:04 --> 00:35:07
			the white men, I guess, you know, yes.
		
00:35:08 --> 00:35:09
			I said
		
00:35:11 --> 00:35:12
			I was thinking I don't want to answer.
		
00:35:15 --> 00:35:16
			Anyway.
		
00:35:17 --> 00:35:22
			Yeah. Why men is that if you read something? Okay, we do have two ways now we have two ways
		
00:35:26 --> 00:35:29
			you have your habit from someone actually
		
00:35:31 --> 00:35:33
			heard Have you heard this heady for himself
		
00:35:35 --> 00:35:37
			or heard the person that he's from his own
		
00:35:40 --> 00:35:41
			talking about shipping his students right
		
00:35:42 --> 00:35:45
			oh tsunami to hurt the heat from the ship
		
00:35:47 --> 00:35:51
			he's the one who said the heavy Okay, so it's not from the students actually don't know
		
00:35:56 --> 00:36:04
			so the questions that arise now if you heard the heavy suppose for example it was the famous
		
00:36:05 --> 00:36:12
			Walkman is the one receiving it from him If man heard that from assembler, and he said he heard it
from me.
		
00:36:21 --> 00:36:24
			But obviously, if you make the mistake the people around him
		
00:36:25 --> 00:36:26
			should correct
		
00:36:30 --> 00:36:37
			the case okay, but he made this close concluded since you'll be corrected he may
		
00:36:38 --> 00:36:42
			my authority, but he should still say that
		
00:36:44 --> 00:36:50
			you know, we are trying to be as exact as possible. Unable to
		
00:36:53 --> 00:36:53
			come out
		
00:36:58 --> 00:36:59
			for mental health See,
		
00:37:10 --> 00:37:10
			have minimum
		
00:37:13 --> 00:37:14
			minimum?
		
00:37:17 --> 00:37:22
			Suppose someone is in a gathering like this. The chef is reading it.
		
00:37:23 --> 00:37:27
			And someone misses a part of the heavy Can he has the one next to him what
		
00:37:30 --> 00:37:31
			have you.
		
00:37:34 --> 00:37:38
			But what about the the provinces in
		
00:37:39 --> 00:37:40
			reported?
		
00:37:41 --> 00:37:43
			provinces send them says they wouldn't be?
		
00:37:45 --> 00:37:49
			Okay. Well, he didn't hear the rest. So yes, it's probably wouldn't be
		
00:37:50 --> 00:37:51
			all
		
00:37:54 --> 00:37:55
			that heavy
		
00:37:57 --> 00:37:57
			as inside.
		
00:37:59 --> 00:38:00
			So what does that mean?
		
00:38:02 --> 00:38:03
			To the SEC, the first question
		
00:38:06 --> 00:38:08
			is, is it permissible for someone the one next thing
		
00:38:11 --> 00:38:17
			and it says permissible, but again, he should make it clear that he did not give any advice.
		
00:38:20 --> 00:38:21
			Somebody mentioned
		
00:38:23 --> 00:38:25
			that they were in the same
		
00:38:34 --> 00:38:40
			in the same meeting. Yeah, well, what they used to do, if you go to the Berlin Museum,
		
00:38:42 --> 00:38:43
			when many manuscripts
		
00:38:46 --> 00:38:49
			from the early years of these 300 cities,
		
00:38:50 --> 00:38:51
			and these manuscripts
		
00:38:53 --> 00:38:54
			look something like this.
		
00:38:55 --> 00:38:56
			You
		
00:38:57 --> 00:38:58
			the same circle
		
00:39:00 --> 00:39:03
			on the margin, they'll put the date.
		
00:39:04 --> 00:39:05
			They'll put everyone
		
00:39:06 --> 00:39:07
			in attendance.
		
00:39:09 --> 00:39:11
			Someone came late, someone's sleeping.
		
00:39:16 --> 00:39:16
			Present.
		
00:39:21 --> 00:39:21
			Really.
		
00:39:24 --> 00:39:31
			So there's some dispute like that you can go to the records, to see what Eddie perrella Let's see,
was the person there and
		
00:39:40 --> 00:39:49
			then we'll get to the future if someone has ever claimed for example, you never narrated as
indicated and someone else has picked up any claims that you did hear from that person. We'll get to
that.
		
00:39:55 --> 00:39:57
			That man had determinacy
		
00:40:00 --> 00:40:01
			What should you do?
		
00:40:04 --> 00:40:05
			Not too many.
		
00:40:06 --> 00:40:07
			Not too many.
		
00:40:09 --> 00:40:12
			Is this allowed to narrate it from someone you have not seen?
		
00:40:19 --> 00:40:20
			Would you accept any from
		
00:40:25 --> 00:40:25
			Nana
		
00:40:27 --> 00:40:28
			Would you accept?
		
00:40:31 --> 00:40:31
			You would
		
00:40:36 --> 00:40:37
			love it.
		
00:40:46 --> 00:40:52
			Even on my phone never saw the promises and in between them promises. What's another example more
important than
		
00:40:55 --> 00:40:59
			think of the hava, the ones that narrated many, many
		
00:41:05 --> 00:41:09
			line level that was related to the point
		
00:41:17 --> 00:41:17
			directly
		
00:41:24 --> 00:41:25
			from this up,
		
00:41:26 --> 00:41:28
			I'll give you a hint about the female.
		
00:41:31 --> 00:41:33
			Did I choose to never
		
00:41:35 --> 00:41:40
			forget, it used to be behind the curtain? The only ones who saw her were close.
		
00:41:43 --> 00:41:45
			So is it allowed to marry from ISIS and Do you not see her
		
00:41:48 --> 00:41:50
			you can develop with some conditions.
		
00:41:51 --> 00:41:53
			Otherwise anyone can stand behind the curve and stay on top. So
		
00:41:57 --> 00:42:02
			you have to they should maybe be someone there who knows or can go behind the curtain
		
00:42:04 --> 00:42:06
			or this was known to be replaced
		
00:42:08 --> 00:42:10
			or revert voice is well known. And he recommended
		
00:42:15 --> 00:42:16
			anything you can imagine
		
00:42:17 --> 00:42:18
			the generation
		
00:42:19 --> 00:42:20
			is renowned
		
00:42:21 --> 00:42:22
			for cases known.
		
00:42:25 --> 00:42:29
			She's from Martin O'Malley was the other lady for what?
		
00:42:30 --> 00:42:31
			Much more money
		
00:42:33 --> 00:42:35
			if you have any of these three conditions? Yeah, I'm saying
		
00:42:37 --> 00:42:43
			for a woman's not from sanity, if they say that they know her face?
		
00:42:44 --> 00:42:48
			No. We're talking about people from behind the curtain.
		
00:42:49 --> 00:42:56
			My point was I know your point you can prove this that there was an apparent gap for what your
		
00:42:57 --> 00:43:03
			in general regardless of this question from behind the curtain that makes those conditions one of
those conditions you may
		
00:43:09 --> 00:43:10
			know
		
00:43:14 --> 00:43:18
			there are many other things and they also used to
		
00:43:20 --> 00:43:22
			budget for the Ministry of
		
00:43:24 --> 00:43:25
			Muslim teachers
		
00:43:26 --> 00:43:27
			to teach them behind
		
00:43:30 --> 00:43:31
			the US
		
00:43:33 --> 00:43:34
			women
		
00:44:03 --> 00:44:06
			By the way, what the well I will leave this question for just remind me I left the question.
		
00:44:08 --> 00:44:13
			Suppose the elements is part of the headings mentioned the first part of the reason it says
		
00:44:16 --> 00:44:17
			may you narrate the whole
		
00:44:27 --> 00:44:27
			thing
		
00:44:31 --> 00:44:32
			you have to say this
		
00:44:39 --> 00:44:40
			what you should do is say
		
00:44:44 --> 00:44:46
			if the headache is well known, you may add it to
		
00:44:47 --> 00:44:48
			the rest of the headache.
		
00:44:54 --> 00:44:57
			Okay, suppose you hear heavy from two areas.
		
00:44:58 --> 00:44:59
			One of them is customer
		
00:45:00 --> 00:45:01
			And the other one is not
		
00:45:02 --> 00:45:05
			when you're nervous Can you just mentioned the trustworthy one and reveal well
		
00:45:11 --> 00:45:11
			you're wrong
		
00:45:13 --> 00:45:15
			if you heard from two people
		
00:45:17 --> 00:45:18
			this is you
		
00:45:20 --> 00:45:25
			you heard anything from this person this person doesn't have the feedback.
		
00:45:29 --> 00:45:32
			This one is trustworthy, which one is weak? Or
		
00:45:33 --> 00:45:36
			can you just mention this chain and ignore the
		
00:45:45 --> 00:45:46
			music and
		
00:45:50 --> 00:45:53
			you don't care what somebody else says.
		
00:45:56 --> 00:45:56
			Okay
		
00:46:03 --> 00:46:06
			you heard it from two people one is the other one is not
		
00:46:07 --> 00:46:08
			to mention you don't have
		
00:46:09 --> 00:46:15
			so for example in a Muslim, non Muslim dad he never mentioned the weakness.
		
00:46:18 --> 00:46:19
			Always mentioned both
		
00:46:21 --> 00:46:21
			but it's not necessary.
		
00:46:28 --> 00:46:30
			Any last questions about these two?
		
00:46:38 --> 00:46:39
			You don't qualify for this.
		
00:46:42 --> 00:46:43
			The next one
		
00:46:44 --> 00:46:44
			is
		
00:46:46 --> 00:46:48
			something I don't think probably would come
		
00:46:49 --> 00:46:49
			about
		
00:46:55 --> 00:46:55
			become
		
00:46:56 --> 00:46:57
			authentic.
		
00:47:11 --> 00:47:13
			Get your question in but it sounds like something
		
00:47:17 --> 00:47:18
			I'm not sure what you're saying.
		
00:47:25 --> 00:47:27
			There's another way of transmitting headaches.
		
00:47:35 --> 00:47:36
			Number three,
		
00:47:40 --> 00:47:40
			vacation
		
00:47:48 --> 00:47:49
			this is the third one.
		
00:48:09 --> 00:48:11
			What is the agenda? What are we talking about?
		
00:48:15 --> 00:48:19
			permit to permit to give someone permission to what
		
00:48:23 --> 00:48:23
			your
		
00:48:25 --> 00:48:26
			permission to narrate your head is.
		
00:48:27 --> 00:48:28
			What the
		
00:48:37 --> 00:48:38
			first of all, he says this.
		
00:48:43 --> 00:48:52
			Then he said, this is like telling someone you have the right to lie on my authority by going and
sing these songs.
		
00:49:02 --> 00:49:03
			Not everyone is like
		
00:49:04 --> 00:49:05
			so anyway, want
		
00:49:07 --> 00:49:07
			to take
		
00:49:09 --> 00:49:10
			an opening gesture.
		
00:49:12 --> 00:49:12
			It's worth it.
		
00:49:14 --> 00:49:14
			Okay.
		
00:49:19 --> 00:49:20
			Now we're talking about
		
00:49:22 --> 00:49:24
			second century onwards.
		
00:49:25 --> 00:49:30
			And this one after like the fifth century, this is perhaps the most important.
		
00:49:34 --> 00:49:36
			It is the most important
		
00:49:37 --> 00:49:38
			form of
		
00:49:45 --> 00:49:46
			abuse
		
00:49:47 --> 00:49:47
			and abuse.
		
00:49:51 --> 00:49:52
			Lovely
		
00:49:53 --> 00:49:54
			to have
		
00:49:59 --> 00:49:59
			you
		
00:50:04 --> 00:50:05
			During this meeting,
		
00:50:11 --> 00:50:13
			what does it imply? What? What?
		
00:50:14 --> 00:50:15
			What does it imply?
		
00:50:21 --> 00:50:22
			qualification.
		
00:50:28 --> 00:50:28
			None of
		
00:50:33 --> 00:50:36
			the people that I give to anyone who said lay the law.
		
00:50:40 --> 00:50:47
			Okay, it was basically used for books. And then the after, after the third and fourth century, we're
talking about big books.
		
00:50:48 --> 00:50:51
			So the ship is supposed to read this big book, as I said,
		
00:50:55 --> 00:50:55
			any,
		
00:50:58 --> 00:51:03
			the shed is supposed to read this book for every student to come to them. That's what happens when
		
00:51:09 --> 00:51:10
			they begin this.
		
00:51:12 --> 00:51:15
			Were not now when I read that I read
		
00:51:22 --> 00:51:24
			when I read a book, like this,
		
00:51:27 --> 00:51:28
			and this is my shift
		
00:51:31 --> 00:51:32
			back to back.
		
00:51:35 --> 00:51:36
			So he has his
		
00:51:38 --> 00:51:38
			back.
		
00:51:41 --> 00:51:42
			So now I read this book.
		
00:51:44 --> 00:51:46
			When I read this book to him, he'll give me a certificate,
		
00:52:01 --> 00:52:02
			they would have given us a certificate,
		
00:52:04 --> 00:52:07
			give a certificate saying he read this book.
		
00:52:09 --> 00:52:11
			And therefore his name would be added to this net
		
00:52:13 --> 00:52:14
			all the way back to
		
00:52:17 --> 00:52:28
			now it's easy to do later than average. Now, no, I'm the situation, I read this book in my ship. So
there's a copy of say, a buddy of mine
		
00:52:29 --> 00:52:30
			that I read.
		
00:52:39 --> 00:52:40
			Okay.
		
00:52:43 --> 00:52:45
			So I have this copy. Now I've written my shift.
		
00:52:46 --> 00:52:47
			So now you've come to me.
		
00:52:48 --> 00:52:51
			And you say you want to read or you want to
		
00:52:52 --> 00:52:52
			report.
		
00:52:54 --> 00:52:56
			So I said, Okay, you have my permission.
		
00:53:00 --> 00:53:04
			So what you have to do now is you have to find that coffee or those coffees that have my
certificate.
		
00:53:06 --> 00:53:10
			And you know, you may narrate from this book on my thoughts.
		
00:53:11 --> 00:53:12
			But you have to say what
		
00:53:17 --> 00:53:19
			you have to mention that you're going to buy
		
00:53:22 --> 00:53:34
			the book for me and I gave you permission to narrate. What that means is that I'm telling you that
I'm sure that this copy is authentic. I read the whole book, and you have my permission to to
narrate my thoughts.
		
00:53:35 --> 00:53:40
			So I'm the one guaranteeing that this is correct. Look at my sample I read it.
		
00:53:49 --> 00:53:51
			What's wrong with it? What's wrong with it?
		
00:53:52 --> 00:53:55
			Is this a strong would you say it's as strong as the now our
		
00:54:01 --> 00:54:02
			certificate here?
		
00:54:04 --> 00:54:07
			certificates you think it might be stronger than some out
		
00:54:10 --> 00:54:11
			there some scholars have said that
		
00:54:13 --> 00:54:14
			it sounds
		
00:54:16 --> 00:54:17
			like
		
00:54:19 --> 00:54:22
			he disliked it because you get lost knowledge without any any work.
		
00:54:27 --> 00:54:30
			You don't have any knowledge, chances are you're probably going to get it
		
00:54:36 --> 00:54:38
			we have not seen anyone doing it from time.
		
00:54:42 --> 00:54:49
			We have not seen anybody doing it will become easy in this matter. The knowledge will be lost in
studying would have known me
		
00:54:51 --> 00:54:57
			for the more it's not the way of the people who have not. So in the early years, there was quite a
bit of dislike
		
00:54:59 --> 00:54:59
			but in
		
00:55:00 --> 00:55:02
			Later years, we're talking about big books. And
		
00:55:04 --> 00:55:05
			by the way, I forgot to mention
		
00:55:06 --> 00:55:08
			that I would like to mention
		
00:55:11 --> 00:55:12
			something I should have mentioned earlier
		
00:55:14 --> 00:55:15
			about traveling and
		
00:55:16 --> 00:55:21
			the even in some of the roads related news like
		
00:55:24 --> 00:55:24
			they've been
		
00:55:30 --> 00:55:32
			around for over
		
00:55:33 --> 00:55:35
			40 years, he did not.
		
00:55:36 --> 00:55:40
			He never left thing. That's why it's so concerning.
		
00:55:54 --> 00:55:56
			Because they never, he never saw.
		
00:56:01 --> 00:56:03
			Enough they never saw soon. And then suddenly, he never saw.
		
00:56:05 --> 00:56:07
			Because those two did not reach payments. And that
		
00:56:09 --> 00:56:13
			was familiar they have they never saw as soon as suddenly as soon as you say.
		
00:56:15 --> 00:56:19
			So one of the benefits of traveling also, is when you travel, you get to see the books in
		
00:56:20 --> 00:56:21
			different parts.
		
00:56:28 --> 00:56:36
			And what the chef will tell you is if you have my permission to narrate this book, you may take a
copy of it and copy it. Sometimes they'll give you a copy to copy.
		
00:56:42 --> 00:56:44
			What are some of the problems with a jet?
		
00:56:52 --> 00:56:54
			Someone might look something in
		
00:56:57 --> 00:56:57
			your face.
		
00:56:59 --> 00:57:05
			That's why supposed to be the job of the ship out your coffee, for example. He's supposed to look at
him
		
00:57:07 --> 00:57:08
			face by face.
		
00:57:16 --> 00:57:17
			If you do that, with
		
00:57:19 --> 00:57:32
			these books, we're talking about 1000s it was less than 9000 students, just his own students. You
can imagine you know a few generations afterwards how many copies are around
		
00:57:33 --> 00:57:34
			about the time that
		
00:57:37 --> 00:57:40
			happened the 9000 at one of the book
		
00:57:41 --> 00:57:42
			at when
		
00:57:47 --> 00:57:50
			they go to a bar over three or four weeks.
		
00:57:52 --> 00:57:56
			Okay, this is one course for his book. Because he might did it
		
00:57:58 --> 00:57:59
			another place
		
00:58:00 --> 00:58:04
			in anything which he did for the 9000 9001 sitting
		
00:58:06 --> 00:58:07
			in the room? Yeah.
		
00:58:12 --> 00:58:13
			Over a period of about 15 years.
		
00:58:17 --> 00:58:21
			By the way, is there any proof in the some not for the gentleman?
		
00:58:33 --> 00:58:39
			Yes, more than no your points and that's more like some ideas from profit, then they go someplace.
And then there is
		
00:58:41 --> 00:58:42
			one guy or a couple
		
00:58:43 --> 00:58:47
			very little from him saying give this to her.
		
00:58:52 --> 00:58:57
			But did he ever give something someone tell them after five days resist
		
00:59:03 --> 00:59:04
			the more than
		
00:59:09 --> 00:59:11
			rarely, okay, but even more than that.
		
00:59:16 --> 00:59:18
			Let's get into it.
		
00:59:19 --> 00:59:20
			Go to
		
00:59:23 --> 00:59:24
			open a
		
00:59:25 --> 00:59:25
			command prompt.
		
00:59:29 --> 00:59:31
			When you get some resistance.
		
00:59:34 --> 00:59:37
			That's the proof that all people are trying to answer and it has
		
00:59:39 --> 00:59:39
			something
		
00:59:43 --> 00:59:44
			to do with
		
00:59:49 --> 00:59:54
			it. I'm sorry. Go to work, leaving the hedge and read this to the people
		
01:00:00 --> 01:00:01
			Hasn't was making
		
01:00:02 --> 01:00:05
			for the books. Not good, that was not
		
01:00:13 --> 01:00:13
			a big difference.
		
01:00:25 --> 01:00:26
			When you read when you receive something,
		
01:00:29 --> 01:00:36
			as we said, you should mention that this was jezza. Or you may also say unbutton. In general, and by
no means you
		
01:00:46 --> 01:00:48
			this is one thing that they took from Arabic
		
01:00:59 --> 01:00:59
			30 years.
		
01:01:01 --> 01:01:03
			Not an early, okay 30 years.
		
01:01:06 --> 01:01:07
			But after the standard books were written,
		
01:01:09 --> 01:01:09
			and
		
01:01:10 --> 01:01:15
			maybe two or three generations after the standard was written, it was used as a way to pass on
		
01:01:17 --> 01:01:17
			books.
		
01:01:19 --> 01:01:20
			And the short can work.
		
01:01:22 --> 01:01:27
			But as I said, it's very important that the ship is supposed to take over the copy, make sure that
		
01:01:30 --> 01:01:32
			you know, the next one is
		
01:01:33 --> 01:01:35
			somewhat similar to that
		
01:01:50 --> 01:01:51
			What is it now,
		
01:01:53 --> 01:01:53
			you
		
01:02:02 --> 01:02:03
			may be with a judge
		
01:02:05 --> 01:02:06
			or maybe without
		
01:02:10 --> 01:02:12
			other words, I may give you a book
		
01:02:13 --> 01:02:18
			and I take this book for me and I give you the permission to narrate the
		
01:02:21 --> 01:02:24
			agenda, some people consider that stronger than some
		
01:02:42 --> 01:02:44
			this book is correct, I give
		
01:02:47 --> 01:02:48
			my permission,
		
01:02:50 --> 01:02:51
			this is actually this
		
01:03:00 --> 01:03:02
			was not your hearing it
		
01:03:03 --> 01:03:09
			and you will write it down either directly or from a student by that time.
		
01:03:21 --> 01:03:24
			But, in general, this is not considered as strong,
		
01:03:25 --> 01:03:27
			but many times included,
		
01:03:28 --> 01:03:29
			included also with
		
01:03:33 --> 01:03:42
			other words, you read the book gives you the book, and then you read effect. So, you have this and
this. And then if you tell you then
		
01:03:44 --> 01:03:44
			you have to
		
01:03:48 --> 01:03:48
			know
		
01:03:51 --> 01:03:54
			the relationship between them.
		
01:03:55 --> 01:04:02
			Keep your hands the student the book, and gives them permission to read the book, or scenario.
Whenever that was
		
01:04:04 --> 01:04:06
			if the teacher gives the book to a student without permission.
		
01:04:11 --> 01:04:15
			And if the teacher doesn't take the call from him, but gets his permission to zap the jet.
		
01:04:17 --> 01:04:29
			With agenda, he may not give you the book, you have to go and find the book to say yes, I have my
certificate copies in the northern library. So we go to the library, so he never actually gets
		
01:04:31 --> 01:04:44
			but one reason why this is preferred is because the coffee goes directly from his head. So hopefully
no one has put anything into the book. And he was directed to him too. But in this case,
		
01:04:45 --> 01:04:50
			in the case of the judges, I will find another coffee or something added something and
		
01:04:52 --> 01:04:53
			could you somebody
		
01:04:56 --> 01:04:59
			could use this book after he died. In which way did he
		
01:05:00 --> 01:05:01
			Give me this first image, and then
		
01:05:02 --> 01:05:03
			we'll get to that
		
01:05:08 --> 01:05:08
			level.
		
01:05:24 --> 01:05:28
			Because the scholars, they discuss
		
01:05:29 --> 01:05:37
			if I can do some heavy, heavy, is it allowed me to marry these headings, but I'm not giving you
permission, you may not know is
		
01:05:41 --> 01:05:41
			that permissible?
		
01:05:50 --> 01:05:51
			So he got
		
01:05:54 --> 01:05:54
			to that point
		
01:05:56 --> 01:05:58
			where unless he has some doubt about it,
		
01:05:59 --> 01:06:01
			he doesn't have the right to say you don't have permission to.
		
01:06:03 --> 01:06:07
			So if you if you make the number two, you,
		
01:06:08 --> 01:06:11
			you may never put at ease. But since he does not give you a chance,
		
01:06:12 --> 01:06:15
			we cannot be certain that those headings are all correct.
		
01:06:16 --> 01:06:19
			Supposedly, because you're sure that those headings are correct.
		
01:06:21 --> 01:06:24
			So that's why we're stronger than when.
		
01:06:37 --> 01:06:37
			Give him an hour that
		
01:06:42 --> 01:06:47
			says obviously, if you receive any, and this way, when you transmit it, you have to mention that
		
01:06:51 --> 01:06:53
			now is the gym, by the way broken,
		
01:07:05 --> 01:07:07
			unbroken, but it is a little bit weak
		
01:07:08 --> 01:07:11
			is not considered the same way as somehow
		
01:07:22 --> 01:07:24
			unbroken, okay? But if
		
01:07:25 --> 01:07:30
			he's headed by a winner winner, and you contradict what someone else receives.
		
01:07:32 --> 01:07:34
			The one reason I will be considered stronger than the ones
		
01:07:36 --> 01:07:38
			broken, but it's not the strongest.
		
01:07:44 --> 01:07:46
			And then exactly, from the time of the process and
		
01:07:58 --> 01:07:59
			the letter to the emperor of Rome.
		
01:08:02 --> 01:08:04
			And also, with
		
01:08:12 --> 01:08:13
			Danny, as you see,
		
01:08:14 --> 01:08:21
			there's a fine distinction between Manila and jazz, especially if you want to take it back to the
phone system.
		
01:08:38 --> 01:08:39
			Unless
		
01:08:47 --> 01:08:48
			you write something
		
01:08:49 --> 01:08:52
			to someone else. Suppose you had
		
01:08:54 --> 01:08:54
			no,
		
01:08:56 --> 01:08:59
			no, that's okay. So in general, we're like
		
01:09:01 --> 01:09:03
			this good way of
		
01:09:05 --> 01:09:06
			doing
		
01:09:07 --> 01:09:10
			survey. Many people used to write letters to Maui about
		
01:09:14 --> 01:09:15
			the technical way.
		
01:09:18 --> 01:09:19
			What are some problems?
		
01:09:22 --> 01:09:24
			What are some of the conditions that we might have to
		
01:09:30 --> 01:09:31
			design everything?
		
01:09:38 --> 01:09:43
			Okay, so the seal and if you know the person seal
		
01:09:44 --> 01:09:46
			What else? What else did
		
01:09:48 --> 01:09:49
			he recognize the handwriting
		
01:09:54 --> 01:09:56
			if you know the one who's giving it to step up
		
01:10:01 --> 01:10:02
			How many have you have
		
01:10:08 --> 01:10:10
			to meet some conditions like those conditions?
		
01:10:20 --> 01:10:21
			So
		
01:10:33 --> 01:10:34
			during this time
		
01:10:35 --> 01:10:39
			and also when you receive this way obviously when you're never able to get up to
		
01:10:41 --> 01:10:42
			receive this
		
01:10:43 --> 01:10:43
			kind of written
		
01:11:00 --> 01:11:01
			What do you think about
		
01:11:03 --> 01:11:04
			12
		
01:11:05 --> 01:11:05
			minutes
		
01:11:18 --> 01:11:24
			that's one of the conditions in order to solve the problem today Is
		
01:11:29 --> 01:11:30
			that sufficient
		
01:11:39 --> 01:11:41
			now he also had his own well known
		
01:11:44 --> 01:11:47
			dignitaries they had their own feelings
		
01:11:49 --> 01:11:50
			used to have American
		
01:11:52 --> 01:11:53
			where they're like what the clothes
		
01:11:54 --> 01:11:56
			you cannot open it without breaking
		
01:11:57 --> 01:11:58
			either breaking the paper or breaking
		
01:12:00 --> 01:12:02
			the papers broke broken.
		
01:12:03 --> 01:12:04
			Like you know those
		
01:12:05 --> 01:12:08
			drugs nowadays. The tough seals broken don't
		
01:12:11 --> 01:12:13
			check back with the sender.
		
01:12:15 --> 01:12:17
			You may have to check back.
		
01:12:28 --> 01:12:29
			You may make
		
01:12:35 --> 01:12:37
			the very last question at the end of
		
01:12:42 --> 01:12:44
			the sufficient when it when you send something