Fariq Naik – Unfair Labels Given the Media to Muslims

Fariq Naik
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The segment discusses the meaning of " fundamentalists" and their movement. The segment also touches on the use of " fundamentalist" in media and political messages, as well as the history of the term " fundamentalist" used in media.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:03 --> 00:00:07
			According to the Webster
Dictionary, fundamentalism was
		
00:00:07 --> 00:00:11
			first used to describe a group of
American protesting Christians who
		
00:00:11 --> 00:00:14
			protested against the church, the
Christian church, it believed that
		
00:00:14 --> 00:00:18
			message the Bible is on call. But
these American protests and
		
00:00:18 --> 00:00:22
			questions the protesters and they
said that not only the Bible is
		
00:00:22 --> 00:00:26
			the message from God, but every
word, every letter, the Bible is
		
00:00:26 --> 00:00:30
			the Word of God. If anyone can
prove that every word, every
		
00:00:30 --> 00:00:33
			letter of the Bible is the Word of
God, then this moment is a good
		
00:00:33 --> 00:00:37
			movement. Whereas on the other
hand, if anyone can prove that
		
00:00:37 --> 00:00:40
			each and every word, every letter
of the Bible is not the word of
		
00:00:40 --> 00:00:43
			God, then the movement is not a
good movement.
		
00:00:45 --> 00:00:49
			According to Oxford Dictionary,
fundamentalist is a person who
		
00:00:49 --> 00:00:53
			strictly adheres to the ancient
doctrines of any religion. And the
		
00:00:53 --> 00:00:57
			revised edition of the Oxford
Dictionary. Fundamentalists is a
		
00:00:57 --> 00:01:01
			person who strictly adheres to the
ancient doctrines of any religion,
		
00:01:01 --> 00:01:03
			especially Islam.
		
00:01:04 --> 00:01:08
			This word, especially Islam has
been added in the revised edition
		
00:01:08 --> 00:01:11
			of the Oxford Dictionary. The
moment you hear the word
		
00:01:11 --> 00:01:15
			fundamentalist, you start to go
for Muslim, you starting off a
		
00:01:15 --> 00:01:19
			terrorist, you start think of an
extremist. And many of the Muslims
		
00:01:19 --> 00:01:22
			are apologetic. They say no, no,
no, I'm not an extremist. I tell
		
00:01:22 --> 00:01:26
			the people I am an extremist. I'm
extremely chi, I'm extremely
		
00:01:26 --> 00:01:29
			merciful. I'm extremely loving.
I'm extremely honest, I'm
		
00:01:29 --> 00:01:32
			extremely just what's wrong and be
an extremist? Why are we
		
00:01:32 --> 00:01:36
			apologetic? What's wrong with
being extremely kind, extremely
		
00:01:36 --> 00:01:39
			honest, extremely, just extremely
loving?
		
00:01:41 --> 00:01:44
			Allah Subhan. Allah says in surah
baqarah chapter two, verse two 208
		
00:01:44 --> 00:01:48
			Oh, the Hello facility kapha,
enter into a slump wholeheartedly,
		
00:01:48 --> 00:01:51
			you can't say partly well, to
benefit me, I'll be just and might
		
00:01:51 --> 00:01:53
			not benefit me, I will not be
just.
		
00:01:55 --> 00:01:58
			And the media says that Muslims
are terrorists, what is the
		
00:01:58 --> 00:02:02
			meaning of the word terrorist?
Tell us by definition means a
		
00:02:02 --> 00:02:03
			person who causes terror.
		
00:02:04 --> 00:02:08
			And many times, two different
labels are given to the same
		
00:02:08 --> 00:02:12
			person for the same activity,
about 60 to 70 years back, before
		
00:02:12 --> 00:02:15
			India gain its freedom. There were
people who were fighting for the
		
00:02:15 --> 00:02:20
			freedom of the country. And these
people by the British government,
		
00:02:20 --> 00:02:23
			they will call us terrorists.
Whereas the same people by the
		
00:02:23 --> 00:02:27
			common Indians, they were called
as freedom fighters, as patriots,
		
00:02:27 --> 00:02:30
			same people, same activity, but to
the labels.
		
00:02:32 --> 00:02:35
			If you agree with the view of the
British government, that the
		
00:02:35 --> 00:02:37
			British has had the right to rule
over India, then you would call
		
00:02:37 --> 00:02:42
			these people as terrorist. Whereas
if you agree with the view of the
		
00:02:42 --> 00:02:44
			common Indians, that the
Britishers had come to the trade
		
00:02:44 --> 00:02:47
			and there are no right to rule
over us, then you would call these
		
00:02:47 --> 00:02:52
			people as freedom fighters as
patriots, same people, same
		
00:02:52 --> 00:02:56
			activity, but two different
labels. And you have several such
		
00:02:56 --> 00:03:00
			examples. We had the example of
the American Revolution that took
		
00:03:00 --> 00:03:02
			place in 1775.
		
00:03:03 --> 00:03:08
			George Washington, he was called
as status number one. Later on,
		
00:03:08 --> 00:03:11
			when America gets his freedom,
George Washington has made the
		
00:03:11 --> 00:03:15
			president of USA imagine
terrorists number one, he's made
		
00:03:15 --> 00:03:16
			the president of USA
		
00:03:17 --> 00:03:21
			we have several such examples. We
had the example of Nelson Mandela,
		
00:03:21 --> 00:03:25
			when South Africa was ruled by the
white apartheid government, Nelson
		
00:03:25 --> 00:03:29
			Mandela was imprisoned in Robben
islands for more than 25 years.
		
00:03:30 --> 00:03:34
			And Nelson Mandela by the white
apartheid government was color
		
00:03:34 --> 00:03:35
			status number one.
		
00:03:36 --> 00:03:39
			Later on, when the white apartheid
government is thrown out, and
		
00:03:39 --> 00:03:44
			South Africa gets its freedom,
Nelson Mandela, he is free and he
		
00:03:44 --> 00:03:48
			gets a Nobel Prize for Peace.
Imagine that is number one gets
		
00:03:48 --> 00:03:49
			Nobel Prize for Peace.
		
00:03:51 --> 00:03:54
			It was not that he was bad. Then
he became good for the same
		
00:03:54 --> 00:03:58
			activity for which he was called
as terrorists he gets a Nobel
		
00:03:58 --> 00:04:02
			Prize for Peace. So here we
realize the media it is very
		
00:04:02 --> 00:04:07
			powerful. It can turn black into
white, white into black hero into
		
00:04:07 --> 00:04:08
			villain villain to hero