Fariq Naik – How to Prove Life after Death Logically Copy

Fariq Naik
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speaker discusses the concept of proof of Islam as a logical religion and how it can be proven through various methods. They also mention a study on the topic of the Glorious Quran and how it suggests that the rest of the universe is impossible to prove. The speaker emphasizes the importance of proving the existence of Islam and the potential consequences of it.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:02 --> 00:00:06
			The 17th most common question that
is there in the minds of non
		
00:00:06 --> 00:00:07
			Muslims is
		
00:00:08 --> 00:00:12
			that if Islam is a logical
religion, then how can we
		
00:00:12 --> 00:00:15
			logically prove that life after
that?
		
00:00:16 --> 00:00:20
			If Islam is logical religion, so
how will we prove life after
		
00:00:20 --> 00:00:20
			death?
		
00:00:21 --> 00:00:25
			Life after that, it is not a blind
belief, but it is a logical
		
00:00:25 --> 00:00:29
			belief. I've given a talk on Quran
and modern science, where I've
		
00:00:29 --> 00:00:34
			proved that in the Glorious Quran,
there are no less than 6000 signs
		
00:00:34 --> 00:00:39
			6000 ayat out of which more than
1000 they speak about science.
		
00:00:40 --> 00:00:44
			So, let's take it that 80 person
offered the glorious grant talks
		
00:00:45 --> 00:00:49
			is proved to be 100% Right. And
the rest when the person it is
		
00:00:49 --> 00:00:51
			ambiguous neither right nor wrong.
		
00:00:53 --> 00:00:57
			And this vest 20 person not even
point one person of this thing it
		
00:00:57 --> 00:01:02
			has been proved wrong. So if 80
person is 100% Right, so my logic
		
00:01:02 --> 00:01:06
			says that the rest 20 person, it
will also inshallah be right.
		
00:01:08 --> 00:01:11
			So this is one way of proving life
after that.
		
00:01:12 --> 00:01:17
			The other way is that I will ask
you a question that is robbing
		
00:01:17 --> 00:01:17
			good or bad
		
00:01:19 --> 00:01:21
			but natural robbing is bad.
		
00:01:23 --> 00:01:28
			Now, I'm a logical person. I'm a
scientific person, you will give
		
00:01:28 --> 00:01:32
			me one logical reason why robbing
is bad for me and I will stop
		
00:01:32 --> 00:01:32
			robbing.
		
00:01:34 --> 00:01:37
			I'm telling you that I'm a logical
person. I'm a scientific person.
		
00:01:38 --> 00:01:41
			You don't give me hundreds of
logical reasons. You just give me
		
00:01:41 --> 00:01:45
			one logical reason why robbing is
bad for me and I will stop robbing
		
00:01:46 --> 00:01:50
			Stephen and rob some money.
Suppose 100,000 rupees I can go to
		
00:01:50 --> 00:01:53
			faster hotel I can eat biryani I
can eat butter, chicken, etc. And
		
00:01:53 --> 00:01:57
			I can enjoy. So why is robbing bad
for me?
		
00:01:58 --> 00:02:02
			Just give me one logical reason
why robbing is bad for me and I
		
00:02:02 --> 00:02:03
			will stop probably
		
00:02:05 --> 00:02:09
			someone might say that you're
robbing someone else's well, he is
		
00:02:09 --> 00:02:09
			getting harmed.
		
00:02:11 --> 00:02:14
			So I'm telling that tell me why is
robbing bad for me. I know it is
		
00:02:14 --> 00:02:17
			bad for him. But why is it bad for
me?
		
00:02:19 --> 00:02:24
			Some people might say that someone
may rob you. I'm a big mafia for a
		
00:02:24 --> 00:02:28
			small day to day robber. Someone
may rob him, but I am a big mafia
		
00:02:28 --> 00:02:31
			you now have hundreds of
bodyguards backstage with AK 47
		
00:02:31 --> 00:02:37
			with sniper super small robber
someone may rob him but I'm a big
		
00:02:37 --> 00:02:40
			draw but I'm a big mafia no one
can rob me. Now some people might
		
00:02:40 --> 00:02:44
			say that the police will catch
you. I want the police and the
		
00:02:44 --> 00:02:47
			ministers in my pocket. So the
police can also not catch me.
		
00:02:48 --> 00:02:52
			So there's no way that you can
logically prove why robbing is bad
		
00:02:52 --> 00:02:56
			for me. Now let's change the
situation. You are the logical
		
00:02:56 --> 00:02:59
			person you are the scientific
person and and the Muslim.
		
00:03:00 --> 00:03:03
			First I will prove to you
regarding the existence of Allah
		
00:03:03 --> 00:03:04
			subhanaw taala
		
00:03:06 --> 00:03:09
			and I've given a talk on is the
Quran God's word
		
00:03:11 --> 00:03:14
			but a fruit regarding the
existence of Allah subhanaw taala
		
00:03:16 --> 00:03:18
			and Allah subhanaw taala says in
the Glorious Quran and Sunnah
		
00:03:18 --> 00:03:22
			Nyssa Chapter Four was worse than
40 in Hola. Hola. When was Carla
		
00:03:22 --> 00:03:25
			Daraa Allah does not commit
injustice even in the least bit.
		
00:03:27 --> 00:03:30
			So I will tell the swab that if
someone robs your father, will you
		
00:03:30 --> 00:03:34
			like it? Your father does not have
bodyguards. If someone robs your
		
00:03:34 --> 00:03:37
			mother will you like it? Your
mother does not have bodyguards.
		
00:03:39 --> 00:03:43
			There may be many robbers who may
go scot free in this world but on
		
00:03:43 --> 00:03:45
			the Day of Judgment, Allah
subhanaw taala will hold them
		
00:03:45 --> 00:03:45
			accountable.
		
00:03:46 --> 00:03:51
			Allah subhanaw taala says remote
chapter 67 was to METU Allah Allah
		
00:03:51 --> 00:03:56
			Kalamata will hire Leah Balu or
you asking Oh am Allah is Allah
		
00:03:56 --> 00:04:01
			plus created life and death to
test which of you are best Indeed,
		
00:04:01 --> 00:04:05
			Allah subhanaw taala says rollin
Ron, chapter number three was the
		
00:04:05 --> 00:04:06
			185
		
00:04:07 --> 00:04:13
			mouth we're in to a phone oh god,
oh PM. Every soul shall have a
		
00:04:13 --> 00:04:16
			taste of that. But the final
recompense it will be on the day
		
00:04:16 --> 00:04:20
			of judgment from an officer and
now what would kill agenda the
		
00:04:20 --> 00:04:22
			first one will hire to dunya Illa
Mata
		
00:04:23 --> 00:04:27
			and whosoever is free from the
hellfire and has entered the
		
00:04:27 --> 00:04:31
			gardens of Paradise, he shall have
achieved the objectives for verily
		
00:04:31 --> 00:04:36
			the life of this world is nothing
except chattels of deception.
		
00:04:38 --> 00:04:42
			There may be many robbers, who may
be leading a luxurious life and
		
00:04:42 --> 00:04:45
			the later on they die. So what
about them?
		
00:04:46 --> 00:04:50
			The leads such a luxurious life
and later on the die, many robbers
		
00:04:50 --> 00:04:53
			they may go scot free in this
world, but on the Day of Judgment,
		
00:04:53 --> 00:04:57
			Allah subhanaw taala will hold
them accountable without hereafter
		
00:04:57 --> 00:05:00
			without life after that there will
be no justice
		
00:05:00 --> 00:05:03
			US and only believing in Allah is
not sufficient. You have to
		
00:05:03 --> 00:05:07
			believe in life after that.
Otherwise your Eman won't be
		
00:05:07 --> 00:05:08
			complete.
		
00:05:10 --> 00:05:13
			There may be many robots who may
go scot free in this world but on
		
00:05:13 --> 00:05:15
			the Day of Judgment, Allah
subhanaw taala will hold them
		
00:05:15 --> 00:05:19
			accountable. You might be knowing
Hitler, he insulated 6 million
		
00:05:19 --> 00:05:20
			Jews
		
00:05:21 --> 00:05:24
			even if the government they catch
him today, what is the maximum
		
00:05:24 --> 00:05:28
			punishment they can give him? They
can kill him only once. What about
		
00:05:28 --> 00:05:33
			the rest? 5,900,999 people What
about them?