Adnan Rashid – Over-Confident Ahmadi Gets Educated
AI: Summary ©
The transcript is a jumbled mix of random and misunderstood statements and entries, including multiple entries about a bastard child, a woman named Razi, and a man named Mirza. The transcript is difficult to summarize as it appears to be a jumbled mix of disconnected sentences and phrases, with multiple entries saying " booked is a bastard child," and multiple entries saying " booked is a bastard child." The transcript is also difficult to read and requires a change in the description. The transcript is a jumbled mix of disconnected sentences and phrases, including a statement about a woman named Razi, a woman from Quran, and a woman from Quran. The conversation ends with a discussion about God and the Christians, as well as a message of love.
AI: Summary ©
Assalamualaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuhu.
MashaAllah, amazing discussion.
May Allah bless Ahmed.
He did an amazing job.
Adnan Rashid Sahib, may Allah guide you all
to the true Islam.
Ameen.
I just had a...
because this is a question and answer session,
I had some...
can I finish please, if you allow?
You can, you can.
I'm just...
I'm just responding to your Salam.
That's very kind of you.
Yes, I really pray that Allah guides you.
So, without getting into that, because I want
to stay on topic.
Firstly, I openly challenge all of you, you
can work together.
Discuss with me on death of Isa, from
Quran, Hadith.
And your own Ulema, you will never do
it, number one.
Number two, Adnan Rashid Sahib, you're a spiritual
scholar, you're a spiritual father.
He wrote a book, Turk-e-Islam.
He wrote a beautiful Usul, which all your
scholars accept.
Brother Hashim, Brother Mansoor, may Allah guide you
brothers as well.
Your scholars accept this Usul as well.
So, the Usul is that a writer, his
writings will be determined by what he himself
explained.
For example, Allah says in the Quran, Now
a Christian comes, show me the rope of
Allah.
That wouldn't make sense, obviously, because you have
to interpret the Quran based on the context,
based on other Ayat.
The allegations you raise, Hazrat Ahmed Al-Ahsan
himself clarifies what he means.
Now, Adnan Rashid, what he's doing is he's
doing what the Christians do regarding the Prophet
ﷺ and what the Jews do.
In Sahih Muslim, there's a Hadith of the
Prophet ﷺ that when you see the Jews,
do not greet them, push them to the
nearest side of the street.
Christians and Jews mock the Prophet ﷺ and
say he taught violence.
What did the Ulema say?
They say, you have to look at the
context.
They said this refers to Banu Qurayza, Ibn
Qayyim, Ibn Taymiyyah, etc.
They have all explained this.
I can give all the references.
Alhamdulillah, we read your books.
Now the question I have for Adnan Rashid
is Brother Ahmed, Alhamdulillah, may Allah bless him
for the amazing point.
Last thing, Brother Adnan, I'm sorry if I'm
speaking too long, but you said Allah is
not subject to the law, but Rasulullah ﷺ
is.
Are we agreed on that?
Hashim, Adnan, Mansoor, Brother Abid, beautiful beard you
got there.
We all agree, yes?
Rasulullah ﷺ is subject to the law.
In Sahih Muslim, Rasulullah ﷺ said, that shall
I not inform you, بِأَحْلِ النَّارِ and he
said, كُلُّ جَوَازٍ زَنِيمٍ مُتَقَبِّرٍ Let me finish,
let me finish.
According to Adnan Rashid, نَوْزُ بِاللَّهِ مِنْ ذَلِكِ
Rasulullah ﷺ was calling people, the meaning that
Iqramah Rahmullah gave for Zanim.
We say no, context matters, and this is
not to be taken literally.
Hazrat, do you accept one meaning of Haram
Zada can be Shari'ah?
Yes or no?
Why do you then put your own hashi,
your own footnotes and attribute something to the
Messiah that no Ahmadi believes, just to cause
hatred in the hearts of the Muslim?
Rasulullah, you need to keep your, wait, wait,
Adnan Bhai, just a minute.
Everyone who joins, please keep your points brief,
because you started it, it seems like you
were reading from a script or something.
No, I have no script.
I know you're not, but all I'm saying
is keep it brief, let's discuss one point.
Don't talk over me, man, calm down.
Rasulullah, have some respect, calm down.
When we talk to each other, let's have
a conversation, okay?
Because what you did was you gave like
a plethora of points.
Make one point, let Adnan respond, when Adnan
responds, make another point so he can respond.
That way we have a good dialogue, a
good discussion, because otherwise it just won't be
productive.
Jazakallah, Hashim Bhai, I will agree to that,
and I will put a timer on so
I don't cross my time, and I will
let Adnan Bhai finish.
Where are you calling from, Rasulullah?
I'm from Canada.
I'm an Ahmadi Muslim, as you are obviously
known by now, and I believe Islam, Ahmadiyya,
follows the way of Quran, Sunnah, and we
love Rasulullah more than anything else.
We would die for him.
Alhamdulillah.
Okay, Adnan, you heard the points, you want
to make a comeback?
These points have already been responded to with
Ahmad, and Razi is trying to beat the
dead horse.
Okay, so Zanim, it has multiple meanings, as
we have discussed, but even if it means
what he claims it means, Allah Subhanahu Wa
Ta'ala is not subject.
Sahih Muslim, Rasulullah Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam is describing
the people of Hellfire.
People of Hellfire will contain adulterers, criminals, mass
murderers.
So Rasulullah is describing the people of Hellfire.
So what a lame attempt to save Mirza
Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani again.
It's a lame attempt.
Mirza is targeting.
He is specifically calling people and their mothers
prostitutes.
He is actually pointing to those people, and
he's saying, your mothers are prostitutes.
Show me anything like that from Abu Bakr,
from the Prophet, or anyone like that.
Don't keep beating a dead horse, because we've
already dealt with Zanim, we've already dealt with
your other claims.
If you were listening carefully earlier, and if
you were not flipping through pages.
So now the point is, Razi, you're very
active on Twitter.
I've seen your tweets.
What you need to do is get one
of your elders, get them to agree to
debate us in a formal setting.
Give me a name, and tell me that
they have agreed to the topic I have
proposed, which is the personality, the character of
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani.
And if any one of them agrees, let
me know.
And then we will discuss the time and
venue so that I am available.
I am actually, I make myself available for
that particular interaction.
So stop going on Twitter, claiming Adnan Rashid,
why are you not responding?
While I respond, I directly responded to you.
So don't do that.
That's not decent behavior.
So with regards to all these arguments we
have already addressed, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani, you
cannot save him.
He was guilty of Qazf.
He was a foul person in terms of
his language, definitely.
And we can talk about other things if
you want, if you want to move on.
So if I can just quickly, your two
minutes are done, Adnan.
If you want extra time, I don't mind,
but then I should also get extra time.
No, this is not a debate, by the
way, this is a Q&A.
I understand, but you guys decided on two
minutes, so we should stick to the Usul,
right?
Just a second, just a second, both of
you.
Who decided the two minute timings?
Brother Hashim did.
I didn't say two minutes.
I said make one point at a time.
Yeah.
And he said the two minute time?
No, no, no.
What we do is, if you want to
discuss, to make it a bit more exciting,
and for people to appreciate what we're doing,
make one point at a time, make it
quickly, and the response will be quick.
So with regards to the terminology like Zuriyatul
Baghaia, Haramzada, Waldul Haram, I have presented your
own translations of these words, and Qadiyatis, the
Ahmadis, have translated them as Kharab Urte.
Ahmed, in the other stream the other day,
admitted that Kharab Urte means prostitute.
This is from Ruhani Khazain, and I will
pull it out again, and you will be
embarrassed.
Haramzada, again, you posted on Twitter, I saw
your tweet, you had the audacity to post
a tweet from an Urdu dictionary, Farhang-e
-Asafiya, and you skipped the three entries, the
first three entries.
You do the same thing Ahmed did.
I don't know if this is a disease,
if this is a mental disorder.
Now you're attacking personality, right?
I'm finishing, I'm finishing.
I don't know what it is, whether this
is partial sight, whether there's a cataract in
your eyes that you cannot see part of
the entries.
You can clearly see the first three entries
are saying Haramzada means a bastard child.
You skip those, and you go straight to
the part where it says mischievous.
You are very mischievous, very, very sharif, and
by using your meaning of the term, you
wouldn't mind if I called you Haramzada, would
you?
Because it means mischievous, and I'm calling you
mischievous, but I wouldn't do that.
I'm not going to do that because I
follow the law of Islam.
Go ahead, over to you.
Jazakumullah Adnan Sahib.
I apologize brother Hashim for, you know, cutting
him earlier.
I thought there was a two-minute rule,
so I sincerely apologize.
We encourage keeping it brief, but my main
point here is that keep it like one
point at a time, rather than give many
points.
So it seems like all of this, what
he just discussed, we already discussed with Ahmed.
We don't want to keep repeating it.
So I was under the impression you have
some new points to add.
I'll mention my new points, but if you
just allow me to quickly respond to what
Adnan Sahib said.
So he said that Zanim has multiple meanings,
and brother Mansur beautifully said that as well.
He's a really intelligent individual.
May Allah guide him and bless him also.
That's our point, that these words have different
meanings, and context is important.
Now, brother Adnan Rashid, I don't say you
lied.
I'm just saying you made a mistake.
You said the Ahmadis translate the Riyat-ul
-Baghaya in Ayn-e-Kamalat.
That's actually done by the Lahoris.
We don't own that, number one.
Number two, as Ahmed Al-Ahsam in Malfoozat
translated it as Sharir-Insan.
Our scholars who have done the translations in
public have always translated the one in Ayn
-e-Kamalat to mean rebellious, under the influence
of rebellious leaders, and this is the meaning
we believe.
If you quote La Nabi Abadi and you
say all these Ahadith, we don't ever claim
that you are, God forbid, what you yourself
are saying that Hazrat Ahmed Al-Ahsam said.
We don't believe that.
In the Qur'an, for example, in Surah
Hud, it says regarding Hazrat Nuh Al-Ahsam,
سَنْ إِنَّهُ لَيْسَ مِنْ أَهْلِكِ That scholars interpret
to mean spiritually he was not of the
family of Nuh Al-Ahsam.
This is the meaning we give that, and
for example, Adnan Rashid, last point, sorry brother
Hashim, is he says Qazaf is needed.
Qazaf is never needed when it's a majazi
term.
For example, because you have written in your
description that you are two billion Muslim brothers
united, Alhamdulillah, so the Barelvi Mujaddid Ahmed Azhar
Khan writes that, someone asked him what's regarding
someone who says the word Haramzadeh.
He says, So your Barelvi brothers might be
happy that I've mentioned him.
So because you are united as one.
But the point is that people who knew
Urdu and know Urdu have always used this
as metaphorical as well.
Now the new point, because we both mentioned
our points, right?
And just last thing, the Kharab word, the
thing brother Ahmed said, it's metaphorically for bad
women.
That was regarding those Christians who said, The
words I don't want to repeat because she's
our mother.
May Allah bless her.
And anyone who insults her, I say today
as well, anyone who insults her, we go
with what Mullah Ali Qari said.
Even if you say Imam Abu Nifa didn't
say, that's fine.
That's up to you.
Now the new point I want to mention
for brother Adnan Rashid is in your description.
Okay, here, I was really happy that you
brothers are doing this show.
And I request you brother Adnan, even if
you need any, you wouldn't need it, but
I'm just saying if you need financial support,
I'm willing to give some more money if
you guys can continue these shows because we
love this.
Because in Pakistan, they don't let us speak.
So the question I have here, I'm just
opening the description.
So in your description, Adnan Rashid has mentioned
many times that you should always be truthful,
right?
You should always be truthful.
I have a clip here about brother Adnan
Rashid saying that Mirza Sahib has never said
that he's reincarnation of Isa A.S., right?
I have the clip here.
But in your description, you brothers wrote he
is the reincarnation.
The truth is we believe Hazrat Isa A
.S. has died according to the Quran.
For example, Allah says, وَمَا مُحَمَّدٌ إِلَّا رَسُولٌ
Hazrat Muhammad A.S. is nothing but a
messenger.
Let me just finish my point, brother Adnan,
then I'll listen to you as well.
I did not cut you off.
I listened patiently.
You're going on for 3-4 minutes.
It's still on the same topic.
I'll finish in 30 seconds.
When the Quran is recited, we should listen,
we shouldn't cut off.
Allah says قَدْ خَلَطْ مِنْ قَبْلِهِ الرُّسُولِ All
messengers before Nabi A.S. have passed with
the same translation I can show from your
Mujaddidin.
The point is Hazrat Isa A.S. has
died according to the Hadith كَيْ فَانْتُمْ إِذَا
نَزَلْ أَبْنَ مَرِيَمَ The word نَزَلَ does not
mean رَجَعَ نَزَلَ is used in the Quran
for خَلَقَ Look at تَفْسِرَ الْكُرْتُبِ So the
point is, we don't believe in reincarnation.
I have it from Adnan Rashid's video.
So brother Hashim, please edit the description and
change that because that is not true.
So I request you to change that to
what we actually believe that he is the
spiritual second coming of the Messiah because Hazrat
Isa A.S. has died, he will never
return.
Exactly.
Firstly, let me very quickly congratulate Razi for
congratulating us.
Thank you very much.
We don't need your financial assistance but we
will be continuing with these shows.
More and more Ahmadis are joining us.
We've received if not hundreds, multiple messages.
We haven't even checked.
I haven't checked messages I've been receiving on
my social media.
When I look randomly, I see many Ahmadis
and ex-Ahmadis messaging saying that, you know
what, thank you so much for the work
you're doing.
We have woken up.
We knew this stuff but we didn't have
the courage to even come forward and discuss
this but you've done that for us.
So leave that to one side.
Coming back to the very points you have
raised.
You again misrepresented Ahmad Raza Khan Barelvi.
You read from him and you read partially
just like you read partially from Farhang Asafiya.
You skipped three entries and you went to
the secondary meeting to prove your point.
Just like you do with the Quran.
You skip all the primary meanings.
You skip to a secondary meaning to make
your point to say Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani's
character.
I dare you to read now the remaining
entries on that very issue you raised about
Ahmad Raza Khan Barelvi.
Go on, read.
I dare you.
Time.
Okay, so are you done?
No, no.
I want you to take out.
No, then you can read it because when
I start, then I'm going to start because
then we're getting into Ahmad Raza Khan's writings
and he's called you Walad-e-Haram.
So you have to translate that.
Razi, is this going to be a decent
conversation?
Yes, it is.
We're going to show the world that Ahmadis
and Muslims can talk to each other with
a lot of respect, with compassion, with mercy.
We're going to demonstrate to the world.
As much as you may be sending curses
upon me on Twitter directly and indirectly, that
means nothing to me.
Let's let the world see that we can
talk to each other.
Yes, I agree.
I want you to read that very, you
know, entry.
You mentioned that Imam Ahmad Raza Khan Barelvi.
He said there is no qadr for Haramzada.
Can you read the next article?
Yes, I can.
On the condition you let me explain his
guide as well, then regarding you.
Razi, please read it.
So he says, so the title is Haramzada,
Haramzadi kehna kaisa hai?
This is his malfoozat.
As with every writer, you have to understand
their malfooz.
Let me finish.
If you're giving me the chance, you have
to let me finish.
We are not asking you to explain it.
The request is for you to read, not
to explain.
Okay, I'll just read it.
I'll just read it.
So he says that if someone says Haramzada,
is there hadd-e-qazaf?
Meaning if it's used as Haramzada.
He says, he quotes Radul Mukhtar.
It's a famous book.
Hanafi's love it.
It mentions there that...
Read the quote, Razi.
Okay, sorry, sorry, sorry.
Because people don't know what Radul Mukhtar is.
But anyhow, he says, Haramzada ke maane sharir
ke aate hai.
Okay.
I repeat, Haramzada ke maane sharir me aate
hai.
Meaning it's used for evil people.
I'm just translating.
Then someone asks a separate question.
That if someone uses it for a bad
woman.
Now here, they're asking about the literal interpretation.
But Naan Rashid thinks it's also...
No, no, no, no.
Stop saying Razi.
Razi, stop now.
Yeah, so...
Don't say that.
Leave the Barelvi Ulama to do the commentaries
on Imam Ahmed Ridaqan Barelvi.
Okay.
You quoted him.
Yeah.
Make a point that Haramzada means sharir.
It can mean sharir.
Wait, wait, wait.
And there is no qazb punishment.
The very next line states that if you
call a woman that, then there is the
qazb punishment.
Correct?
Exactly.
Literally.
Stop there now.
I agree with you.
100%.
Okay.
Okay.
Why did you hide that from the masses?
Okay.
So let me explain now.
If you give me full time.
You can explain.
You asked a question.
Can I...
Let people hear from me now.
Okay.
The reason you did that is the same
reason why you skipped the entries from Farhang
-e-Asafiya.
You play these games deliberately.
You are a very intelligent man.
We know you're highly educated.
You're highly capable of tweeting and putting videos
together and making up arguments.
You're very intelligent.
You're not dumb.
You're not stupid.
We know that.
But you're doing this deliberately.
You hide information.
You know the story of the rabbis who
came to the Prophet and the Prophet asked,
what is the punishment for zina in your
religion?
And they had put their hands on top
of the verses that prescribed the punishment.
And then Abdullah bin Salam, he came who
was also a Jewish scholar.
He said, move your hand.
And the verses were under their hand.
This is what you guys are doing to
your people.
You're hiding basic facts from your people so
that you can lie to them, deceive them.
Now, the entry is very clear.
You call a woman that, okay, then it
is qasd.
Then you will be punished.
So you even misrepresented Ahmad Rida Khan Barelvi.
You cannot quote anyone.
This is why I advise everyone watching.
When Ahmadi missionaries, with due respect, with due
respect, when Ahmadi missionaries bring something to you,
always check three things.
Always check three things.
The authenticity of the report, the translation of
it, and the context of it.
Never take anything from them at face value.
As we have shown conclusively tonight, these guys,
they cannot be trusted.
They repeatedly misquote sources and spin sources to
save who?
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani.
That's why they don't want to talk about
him.
Okay.
Over to you.
You have two minutes, and then we're going
to let someone.
Let's see.
Now you're putting a time on me.
At least give me my full time to
answer this.
I won't go past four minutes.
It's a Q&A.
Okay, but I won't go past four minutes.
We can't put the two minute now that
you spoke.
Just make your point.
That's fine.
Jazakallah, brother Hashim, brother Mansoor, for being just.
May Allah guide you.
Just carry on without any compliments or anything.
Basically, I have to respond to the previous
points of Adnan said as well, because he
spoke for, like, 10 minutes.
So he said, Ahmadis are joining us.
Alhamdulillah, here in Canada, we have so many
people joining us as well, including Canadians who
are accepting Islam Ahmadiyya.
Sunni, Muslims, Deobandis, Barelvis, Ahli Hadith.
People seeing Nabi Salaam in their dreams, telling
them to accept Ahmadiyya.
We have it as well.
That's not a dalil.
Then you said we gave you courage.
Alhamdulillah.
That makes me really happy that you're giving
us a platform to share the true view
of the Prophet Salaam.
Etc.
So, you said, you gave them, you asked,
why are we hiding for Hange Asfiyah, the
other tarjuma, and for Ahmad Azza Khan.
So, I just want to make it clear.
Allah is my witness.
Wallahi, we have nothing to hide.
It is you who hid the secondary meanings,
which is why we showed the secondary meanings
on there.
We're showing what there's ikhtilaf on.
Why would we show you the meanings there's
ittafaq on?
That doesn't make sense.
Wallahi, we had no issue with the other
meanings.
I quoted the scans on Twitter.
The other meanings are there, brother.
So, please do not do this deception.
My advice for the Muslims, whenever discussing with
Sunnis and people like Adnan Rashid, go back
to the writings of Hazrat Ahmad Al-Ahsan
and read his books.
He was the greatest defender of Islam.
Alhamdulillah.
Muhammad Hussain Bataan Bin Isha'at Al-Sunnah
said all of his prophecies and ilhamat were
fulfilled.
I have the scan in front of me.
I can send it to Adnan Rashid.
His spiritual scholar said that Muhammad
Hussain Bataan Bin Isha'at is a great
testimony today to the truthfulness of Hazrat Ahmad
Al-Ahsan.
And once again, open challenge.
You four can work together.
Debate me from Quran right now.
That's the visa lesson.
I will stay here for five hours.
I have the Quran here.
Okay.
You guys cannot discuss from the Quran.
I'll stop you there.
Adnan Rashid is running away and changing topics.
Your time is up.
Let me ask you a question.
This will show everyone again how disingenuous you
people are.
What was the opinion of Muhammad Hussain Bataan
Bin Isha'at after Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani
claimed prophethood?
Be very honest.
Otherwise, I will be really honest.
It was the same response that Kuffar-e
-Makkah gave to Nabi Salaam after his claim.
Before that, they said Siddiq Ameen.
The ayat is here.
Why do you people, why did Nabi Salaam,
why did Allah quote them?
You have to kick me out now because
I have Quran.
You have nothing, brother.
You have nothing.
I think Razi, just to make a point.
This is not about Razi.
Razi, can I just make a point?
I just want to make a point, if
I may.
Razi, are you listening?
Adnan Bhai, just a second.
Razi misrepresented Ahmad Rida Khan Barilvi.
Can I hear Mansoor Bhai, please?
How far are we going to go?
Razi keeps attributing things to people they didn't
believe in.
Muhammad Hussain Bataan Bin Isha'at and all
other scholars of Islam who debated Mirza Ghulam
Ahmad Qadiani.
May Allah have mercy on them, all of
them.
You know, he declared him to be a
kafir after he claimed to be a prophet.
So what they do is they actually quote.
Just like Kuffar-e-Maqasid.
Let me finish.
They actually quote earlier writings of these people
when Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani was doing some
good work.
He was debating.
He was debating the Arya Samad.
He was debating some questions and the Muslims
are happy about it.
Until Mirza came out with his shenanigans, claiming
to be a prophet after Rasulullah, Prophet Muhammad
Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam.
That's when the ulama woke up and they
realized this guy was building up all of
it.
For this, for this.
He was claiming to be, he was going
to claim to be a prophet.
So that's why they declared takfir on him.
So don't quote, just like you put up
one of my clips claiming that I was
praising Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani.
But if you watch the whole stream, it
will be clear that I was praising him
as much.
I would praise Hitler for it.
I saw it as evil as he was.
I was praising Salman Rushdie for his writing
skills, as evil as he was.
I was praising Mirza Ghulam.
Brother Adnan, your voice.
I was, I was, I was praising Mirza
Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani as evil as he was
for his, you know, good skills as a
writer.
Earlier, when he was writing good works, we
praise him for that.
But then afterwards, he himself completely destroyed all
the good work.
You know, Shaytan, Shaytan, Shaytan taught us the
use of Ayatul Kursi.
It was Shaytan.
The Prophet Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam said, the Prophet
said about him.
The Prophet said about Shaytan, Iblis, that even
though he's a compulsive liar, but this time
he spoke the truth.
Now, Satan worshippers.
Imagine if they took that quote from the
Prophet and then they go out publicly and
say, oh, the Prophet of Islam praised Shaytan.
He praised Iblis.
He called him truthful.
But what is the context?
The context is the Prophet is saying, even
though he's a compulsive liar, this time he
spoke the truth.
So when Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani wrote in
his book, Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya, that Isa A
.S. is alive in the heavens.
He was raised alive and he will descend
near the end of times.
That was good in his book.
No, that was a good.
Can I give my last statement?
And then he changed later on.
So we are done with you, Razi.
I want to give my last statement, Brother
Adnan.
I'm just lasting, if you allow.
I'm not going to engage with you because
I believe you don't have any credibility.
I'm just lasting.
It's a Sahih Bukhari Hadith.
Don't be afraid to quote of Rasulullah.
Don't be afraid of Quran Hadith, Brother.
I'm trying to quote a Hadith and you're
afraid.
It's Sahih Bukhari.
The previous claim is pure.
After that, everyone raises allegations.
Sahih Bukhari 4971.
When Nabi S.A.S. said, before he
became a prophet, he said, Siddiq, Ameen.
They said, Any falsehood.
Then when he said, I am a warner
to you.
They said, Exactly what you did regarding Hazrat
A.S. And you have sealed his truth.
May Allah bless you.
And guide you.
And enable you to accept the Imam of
the age, Hazrat A.S. Unlike Batalbi's children
who went astray.
You can go to Maghrib prayer.
Pray for yourself.
That Allah guides you to the truth.
Razi has to stop his shenanigans.
No problem.
Razi, thank you for your time.
Let's leave on a positive note.
Thank you for your time.
Look into the things I've mentioned.
You're a young man.
Don't waste your life defending God.
And I say the same.
Don't defend the Christians who think Isa A
.S. is alive in the heavens.
All right, Razi.
I think we had a good discussion.
Let's leave it.
Let's leave it at that.
Inshallah.
May Allah bless you all.
Assalamualaikum.
Waalaikumussalam.