Abu Taymiyyah – Lets Rip that scholar apart and cutting people’s eyes out

Abu Taymiyyah
AI: Summary ©
The importance of verifying and proving the truth of a scholar's statement is crucial to holding him with etiquette and calmness. The third step is to write in golden ink and to adopt the step, with the advice to be clear about their statement and to notifying the scholar of their mistakes. The importance of notifying the scholar of their mistakes and bringing proof to them is also emphasized.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:22 --> 00:00:23

Assalamu Alaikum Wa Rahmatullah.

00:00:24 --> 00:00:26

Brothers and sisters, here we come again in

00:00:26 --> 00:00:27

another episode of Benefits

00:00:28 --> 00:00:29

and InshaAllah

00:00:30 --> 00:00:32

we benefit ourselves and we benefit the rest

00:00:32 --> 00:00:33

of the people that are around us.

00:00:34 --> 00:00:35

Putting into application the statement

00:00:37 --> 00:00:38

of

00:00:39 --> 00:00:42

Allah Remind for inida, remind their benefits to

00:00:42 --> 00:00:44

believers. What I wanna do inshallah wu ta'ala

00:00:44 --> 00:00:46

is read a speech of Ibn R Usaymin

00:00:46 --> 00:00:49

Rahimahullah Wa Ta'ala the great sallah Muhammad bin

00:00:49 --> 00:00:50

Sallihir R Usaymin

00:00:51 --> 00:00:53

that which is related to dealing with the

00:00:53 --> 00:00:55

mistake of a person of knowledge.

00:00:56 --> 00:00:58

When we hear a mistake or something negative

00:00:58 --> 00:01:00

about a scholar, do we jump on Twitter

00:01:00 --> 00:01:01

or on Instagram

00:01:02 --> 00:01:03

or start Snapchatting

00:01:03 --> 00:01:05

to the people that this scholar has just

00:01:05 --> 00:01:07

done this and he's like this and start

00:01:07 --> 00:01:09

defaming him and speaking negatively about him?

00:01:10 --> 00:01:11

Is this

00:01:11 --> 00:01:13

the way that we should go about dealing

00:01:13 --> 00:01:13

with

00:01:14 --> 00:01:16

a negative aspect we heard about the sheikh

00:01:16 --> 00:01:18

or a person of knowledge? Whether he's a

00:01:18 --> 00:01:20

scholar, whether he's a student of knowledge. How

00:01:20 --> 00:01:22

do we go about dealing with it? This

00:01:22 --> 00:01:24

is inshallah wata'ala what I want to do

00:01:24 --> 00:01:26

because it has become very very common in

00:01:26 --> 00:01:27

our society today.

00:01:28 --> 00:01:30

People coming out on social media,

00:01:32 --> 00:01:35

taking pictures of scholars or taking pictures of

00:01:36 --> 00:01:36

students,

00:01:37 --> 00:01:39

taking their eyes out, putting red marks on

00:01:39 --> 00:01:41

their face, oh he said this.

00:01:42 --> 00:01:44

Without actually going

00:01:44 --> 00:01:45

and

00:01:46 --> 00:01:46

the the correct

00:01:47 --> 00:01:49

steps of dealing with a negative thing,

00:01:50 --> 00:01:52

a incorrect statement you may have heard about

00:01:52 --> 00:01:52

a

00:01:53 --> 00:01:54

person of knowledge.

00:01:55 --> 00:01:57

So Insha Allahu Ta'ala, I want to point

00:01:57 --> 00:01:58

this out here. And

00:01:59 --> 00:02:01

I will just notify every single one of

00:02:01 --> 00:02:04

you. What I'm speaking about is a person

00:02:04 --> 00:02:05

of knowledge. Someone who is known to be

00:02:05 --> 00:02:08

upon goodness, known to be following the Quran

00:02:08 --> 00:02:09

and the Sunnah.

00:02:09 --> 00:02:12

Someone that has become known for this. As

00:02:12 --> 00:02:13

for an innovator

00:02:13 --> 00:02:14

who is known for innovation,

00:02:15 --> 00:02:16

he is known to

00:02:16 --> 00:02:19

oppose Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala's book and the

00:02:19 --> 00:02:20

messenger

00:02:22 --> 00:02:23

Then this individual

00:02:25 --> 00:02:27

he doesn't have the same

00:02:27 --> 00:02:29

way of being dealt with like a personal

00:02:29 --> 00:02:30

knowledge would be dealt with.

00:02:31 --> 00:02:33

He is to be refuted openly.

00:02:33 --> 00:02:35

His mistakes are meant to be mentioned and

00:02:35 --> 00:02:37

explained to the people because he's someone that

00:02:37 --> 00:02:40

is stubborn and arrogant who has failed to

00:02:41 --> 00:02:43

come to the reality of Allah subhanahu wa

00:02:43 --> 00:02:45

ta'ala's religion after time and time again he's

00:02:45 --> 00:02:48

been spoken to. We're speaking about an individual

00:02:48 --> 00:02:50

known to be upon the sunnah, known to

00:02:50 --> 00:02:52

have knowledge, known to be teaching the books

00:02:52 --> 00:02:55

of the Salaf, the 3 golden generations and

00:02:55 --> 00:02:56

then those that came after them.

00:02:57 --> 00:02:59

So he says under the hadith Adeen and

00:02:59 --> 00:03:00

Naseeha.

00:03:03 --> 00:03:04

The religion is advised.

00:03:05 --> 00:03:07

When the prophet Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam,

00:03:08 --> 00:03:09

he said,

00:03:15 --> 00:03:17

When he was asked of him to who?

00:03:17 --> 00:03:19

He said to Allah Azzawajal,

00:03:23 --> 00:03:24

I met

00:03:24 --> 00:03:26

him also to the book and to the

00:03:26 --> 00:03:29

messenger sallallahu alaihi wa sallam and also the

00:03:30 --> 00:03:32

rule, the leaders of the Muslims.

00:03:34 --> 00:03:36

And the leaders of the Muslims are of

00:03:36 --> 00:03:38

2 types. You have the Umara,

00:03:38 --> 00:03:39

the

00:03:39 --> 00:03:41

leaders of, like, the countries and things like

00:03:41 --> 00:03:42

that, and you also have the scholars.

00:03:43 --> 00:03:44

And brothers and sisters

00:03:45 --> 00:03:48

write this in golden ink. Wallahi, it is

00:03:48 --> 00:03:49

something that many people today,

00:03:50 --> 00:03:51

they

00:03:51 --> 00:03:53

haven't done and they have torn apart

00:03:54 --> 00:03:55

the honor of the scholars

00:03:56 --> 00:03:56

because

00:03:57 --> 00:03:58

they haven't learned this.

00:03:59 --> 00:04:00

So Ibn Uthimin says

00:04:09 --> 00:04:11

If something has not been ascribed to any

00:04:11 --> 00:04:12

of the scholars,

00:04:14 --> 00:04:16

something that is disliked, something that you disapprove

00:04:16 --> 00:04:17

of,

00:04:20 --> 00:04:22

It is upon you to take these steps.

00:04:25 --> 00:04:26

The first step,

00:04:28 --> 00:04:30

And firstly, you need to

00:04:32 --> 00:04:35

verify that which has been ascribed to this

00:04:35 --> 00:04:35

individual.

00:04:39 --> 00:04:42

How many things have been ascribed to scholars?

00:04:42 --> 00:04:43

But the reality of the matter is that

00:04:43 --> 00:04:44

it is a lie.

00:04:46 --> 00:04:48

Firstly, it is a must

00:04:48 --> 00:04:50

that you go and verify and you make

00:04:50 --> 00:04:52

sure that which has been ascribed to him

00:04:52 --> 00:04:53

is actually true.

00:04:57 --> 00:04:58

If you have now

00:04:58 --> 00:05:00

verified and made sure that which has been

00:05:00 --> 00:05:01

ascribed to him

00:05:05 --> 00:05:07

It's upon you now

00:05:07 --> 00:05:09

to move on to the second step which

00:05:09 --> 00:05:10

is

00:05:14 --> 00:05:15

It's upon you to ponder.

00:05:16 --> 00:05:18

Is this something that is worthy of

00:05:19 --> 00:05:19

criticism?

00:05:20 --> 00:05:21

Or is it not?

00:05:25 --> 00:05:28

Because it could become apparent to a person

00:05:28 --> 00:05:29

from the get go.

00:05:30 --> 00:05:33

That this statement is a statement that

00:05:33 --> 00:05:34

is

00:05:34 --> 00:05:34

criticized.

00:05:37 --> 00:05:39

And after pondering upon the issue, you find

00:05:39 --> 00:05:40

that

00:05:40 --> 00:05:42

this statement is the truth.

00:05:47 --> 00:05:49

It's upon you to ponder and look into

00:05:49 --> 00:05:51

the issue so that you're able to know

00:05:51 --> 00:05:53

as to whether this issue is is worth

00:05:53 --> 00:05:54

of,

00:05:55 --> 00:05:56

you know, criticism or not.

00:05:59 --> 00:06:00

The 3rd step.

00:06:03 --> 00:06:04

It even becomes now clear to you that

00:06:04 --> 00:06:05

this

00:06:06 --> 00:06:08

statement that has been ascribed to him

00:06:08 --> 00:06:10

is not worthy of criticism or anything like

00:06:10 --> 00:06:11

that.

00:06:13 --> 00:06:16

It is mandatory upon you to what?

00:06:17 --> 00:06:20

To defend the honor of the Sheikh. And

00:06:22 --> 00:06:24

to also spread this amongst the

00:06:27 --> 00:06:28

people.

00:06:29 --> 00:06:31

And to also make it clear to the

00:06:31 --> 00:06:33

people that which the statement, this what the

00:06:33 --> 00:06:36

scholar has mentioned, Haqqun, it is a statement

00:06:36 --> 00:06:37

of truth.

00:06:39 --> 00:06:41

Even if the people are in a position

00:06:41 --> 00:06:41

to this.

00:06:44 --> 00:06:44

4th

00:06:46 --> 00:06:46

step.

00:06:49 --> 00:06:51

If it becomes now, you know, clear to

00:06:51 --> 00:06:53

you based upon your opinion.

00:06:59 --> 00:07:01

That which has been ascribed to this scholar

00:07:01 --> 00:07:03

after after verifying

00:07:04 --> 00:07:06

that this was, you know

00:07:06 --> 00:07:08

this is not a statement of truth or

00:07:08 --> 00:07:10

looking into the issue that it's not a

00:07:10 --> 00:07:11

statement of truth.

00:07:15 --> 00:07:18

It is upon you and it's mandatory upon

00:07:18 --> 00:07:19

you to hold this scholar

00:07:23 --> 00:07:26

with etiquette and also with tranquility, with calmness.

00:07:29 --> 00:07:31

I heard this and this about you.

00:07:35 --> 00:07:37

And I would like for you

00:07:38 --> 00:07:40

to explain to me the angle that you're

00:07:40 --> 00:07:42

coming from. Allahu Akbar.

00:07:43 --> 00:07:46

This statement brothers and sisters underline it twice.

00:07:46 --> 00:07:49

You call him, not that you're saying a

00:07:49 --> 00:07:52

statement of Iptida. You've you've set an innovative

00:07:52 --> 00:07:53

statement. No.

00:07:53 --> 00:07:54

Call him

00:07:54 --> 00:07:55

and say to him, can you explain to

00:07:55 --> 00:07:57

me the angle that you're coming from?

00:07:58 --> 00:08:00

This is adab of its highest.

00:08:00 --> 00:08:01

Manas of its highest.

00:08:06 --> 00:08:08

Because you are more knowledgeable than me,

00:08:08 --> 00:08:10

humbling yourself in front of him.

00:08:14 --> 00:08:16

If he now clarifies this to you,

00:08:19 --> 00:08:21

You have the right now to discuss the

00:08:21 --> 00:08:22

issue with him.

00:08:27 --> 00:08:28

But with etiquettes.

00:08:29 --> 00:08:30

And also

00:08:31 --> 00:08:32

preserving his status.

00:08:34 --> 00:08:35

And also

00:08:36 --> 00:08:37

that which suits him best.

00:08:38 --> 00:08:40

Without downgrading him or pushing him down. Because

00:08:40 --> 00:08:42

we know that these scholars are higher than

00:08:42 --> 00:08:44

all of us. They deserve the respect.

00:08:45 --> 00:08:47

And he has been in knowledge more longer

00:08:47 --> 00:08:48

than you.

00:08:49 --> 00:08:51

And then he goes on to say what

00:08:51 --> 00:08:52

many people do today.

00:08:55 --> 00:08:58

As for what many ignorant people do.

00:09:01 --> 00:09:04

When they come to a scholar who sees

00:09:04 --> 00:09:06

other than the what they see.

00:09:08 --> 00:09:09

They come to him

00:09:10 --> 00:09:11

with harshness

00:09:12 --> 00:09:13

and also with severity.

00:09:15 --> 00:09:15

And

00:09:17 --> 00:09:20

maybe they start moving their hands in front

00:09:20 --> 00:09:20

of his face.

00:09:24 --> 00:09:26

What is this statement? They say to him,

00:09:26 --> 00:09:27

what is the statement you have innovated into

00:09:27 --> 00:09:28

the religion?

00:09:30 --> 00:09:31

What is this evil statement that you have

00:09:31 --> 00:09:32

said?

00:09:33 --> 00:09:35

Do you not fear Allah

00:09:44 --> 00:09:46

After pondering and looking into the issue, they

00:09:46 --> 00:09:48

realized that the scholar,

00:09:48 --> 00:09:51

this person of knowledge, he was in accordance

00:09:51 --> 00:09:51

to the hadith

00:09:52 --> 00:09:53

and they were in opposition to it.

00:09:57 --> 00:09:59

And a lot of these people you find,

00:09:59 --> 00:10:02

they tend to adopt this kind of approach

00:10:02 --> 00:10:04

due to them being amazed with themselves.

00:10:07 --> 00:10:08

And the fact that they think that they

00:10:08 --> 00:10:09

are the people of the

00:10:10 --> 00:10:11

Sunnah.

00:10:12 --> 00:10:13

And they actually think that they are upon

00:10:13 --> 00:10:14

the way of the Salaf.

00:10:18 --> 00:10:19

And they're the furthest when it comes to

00:10:19 --> 00:10:22

being upon the way of the Salaf and

00:10:22 --> 00:10:23

from the Sunnah of the Prophet sallallahu alaihi

00:10:23 --> 00:10:24

wa sallam.

00:10:25 --> 00:10:26

So brothers and sisters,

00:10:26 --> 00:10:29

that's very very important. These four steps I

00:10:29 --> 00:10:30

advise every single one of you to write

00:10:30 --> 00:10:33

in golden ink and to adopt this. If

00:10:33 --> 00:10:35

you hear this from a scholar whether he

00:10:35 --> 00:10:37

is in Saudi Arabia, whether he is in

00:10:37 --> 00:10:39

Egypt, whether he is in Aleman, then you

00:10:39 --> 00:10:41

call, you pick up the phone and you

00:10:41 --> 00:10:42

find out.

00:10:42 --> 00:10:45

Maybe there is a time that he's looking

00:10:45 --> 00:10:47

at something from a certain angle. He has

00:10:47 --> 00:10:49

proofs with him or he might not even

00:10:49 --> 00:10:50

have a proof with him but he's looking

00:10:50 --> 00:10:52

at something from a certain angle.

00:10:54 --> 00:10:55

And he may have

00:10:56 --> 00:10:57

used a consensus

00:10:58 --> 00:11:00

that you're not aware of or you have

00:11:00 --> 00:11:02

made or you might have made a analogy,

00:11:02 --> 00:11:03

a qiyas,

00:11:03 --> 00:11:04

that

00:11:05 --> 00:11:06

is a bit too much for you to

00:11:06 --> 00:11:07

comprehend.

00:11:07 --> 00:11:09

So it's upon you to ask. If you

00:11:09 --> 00:11:12

think that he's wrong then you have every

00:11:12 --> 00:11:14

right to discuss with him the issue.

00:11:16 --> 00:11:18

And to carry on discussing it with him

00:11:18 --> 00:11:20

but with adib and baqaar,

00:11:20 --> 00:11:22

with etiquette and manners.

00:11:23 --> 00:11:24

And also at 10b

00:11:25 --> 00:11:27

something that I'm going to bring to your

00:11:27 --> 00:11:28

attention he also mentions

00:11:32 --> 00:11:34

If you see a mistake from these scholars,

00:11:36 --> 00:11:38

don't keep quiet and say that he's more

00:11:38 --> 00:11:39

knowledgeable than me.

00:11:42 --> 00:11:43

Rather it's upon you to

00:11:43 --> 00:11:45

discuss the issue with Adam with etiquettes and

00:11:45 --> 00:11:46

also with respect.

00:11:51 --> 00:11:53

Because sometimes you find that the ruling is

00:11:53 --> 00:11:54

hidden from a person.

00:11:57 --> 00:11:59

So someone that might be lesser than him

00:11:59 --> 00:11:59

in knowledge

00:12:00 --> 00:12:01

might what?

00:12:01 --> 00:12:03

Notify him of the mistake.

00:12:07 --> 00:12:09

So this scholar or this person is higher

00:12:09 --> 00:12:11

than the one that's actually advising him. He

00:12:11 --> 00:12:13

begins to pay more attention.

00:12:15 --> 00:12:17

And this is part of giving advice to

00:12:17 --> 00:12:17

the scholars.

00:12:17 --> 00:12:20

Sometimes you find that a brother may have

00:12:20 --> 00:12:22

refuted or maybe clarified some of the mistakes

00:12:22 --> 00:12:24

of a certain individual, and he's done this

00:12:24 --> 00:12:24

with Adam

00:12:25 --> 00:12:27

as you find now on social media and

00:12:27 --> 00:12:27

other places.

00:12:28 --> 00:12:30

And you find people posting in the comment

00:12:30 --> 00:12:32

section, who are you to come advise him?

00:12:33 --> 00:12:35

Who are you to come advise him? You

00:12:35 --> 00:12:37

are no way near the guy in knowledge.

00:12:37 --> 00:12:38

That is totally wrong.

00:12:39 --> 00:12:40

Rather the prophet

00:12:44 --> 00:12:46

said, Whoever sees an evil, they can change

00:12:46 --> 00:12:47

it with his hand.

00:12:48 --> 00:12:50

As is very well known in Usul Fiqh.

00:12:51 --> 00:12:52

The word

00:12:52 --> 00:12:54

means whoever. It is from the words that

00:12:54 --> 00:12:57

indicate generality. It's not specific to a certain

00:12:57 --> 00:12:58

individual.

00:12:59 --> 00:13:00

Even if it is the biggest Sheikha, I

00:13:00 --> 00:13:03

always tell my students, the brothers, 'Naam Even

00:13:03 --> 00:13:05

if Sheikh Falaah or Sheikh Fawzan was to

00:13:05 --> 00:13:06

come to our Masjid and he would say

00:13:06 --> 00:13:08

a statement and he doesn't bring

00:13:08 --> 00:13:10

proof, we have every right to go up

00:13:10 --> 00:13:11

to the Sheikh and ask him, 'Yas Sheikh

00:13:11 --> 00:13:13

what's your proof?' As for it being 'Aib'

00:13:13 --> 00:13:15

as what people say, oh don't ask him

00:13:15 --> 00:13:18

this question, it is shameful for you to

00:13:18 --> 00:13:19

ask him about the proof

00:13:19 --> 00:13:20

Allah says

00:13:22 --> 00:13:23

Say to Ramb Muhammad bring forth your proof

00:13:23 --> 00:13:25

if you are people that are truthful.

00:13:26 --> 00:13:28

So bringing proof is connected to what?

00:13:29 --> 00:13:30

Truthfulness.

00:13:32 --> 00:13:33

You have every right to

00:13:34 --> 00:13:35

mention the mistake.

00:13:36 --> 00:13:38

As for you being lower in knowledge and

00:13:38 --> 00:13:40

saying, oh no, he's higher than me. This

00:13:40 --> 00:13:41

is not correct.

00:13:41 --> 00:13:43

And this is also an ignorant statement that

00:13:43 --> 00:13:45

we see time and time again on Facebook

00:13:45 --> 00:13:47

and we ask Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala to

00:13:47 --> 00:13:49

give us a tawfiqna success to act upon

00:13:49 --> 00:13:52

the speech of this great imam, Sheikh Salihal

00:13:52 --> 00:13:53

Bussaimin Rahimahullah

00:13:54 --> 00:13:54

Subhanakallahu

Share Page