Abu Taymiyyah – A Critical Analysis of the Spubs Double Standards
AI: Summary ©
AI: Transcript ©
Brothers and sisters Insha Allahu Ta'ala
in this sitting
what we want
to talk about
is some of the problems that have been
taking place.
Some of the things that have been mentioned
on the social networking websites
like Twitter
that's being circulated on Facebook
about our brother Abdul Rahman Hassan. May Allah
subhanahu wa ta'ala preserve him.
And as you all know,
the prophet sallallahu alaihi wa sallam mentioned,
Whoever now defends the honor of his brother,
then Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala has made it
wazhu upon himself
to protect this individual from the fire.
And the hadith
was authenticated by Imam al Albani Rahimahu Ta'ala.
And because of all the oppression that has
taken place,
I feel
that's important
that I clarify some of these matters that
have been said so that people have the
correct understanding.
When it comes to dealing
with something like this in the future.
And what I wanna speak about
is in 3 parts.
Firstly,
how do we deal
with someone from Ahlul Sunnatiwal Jama'a?
Someone who is known to teach
the books of the salif. Someone that is
known to be upon the sunnah.
When he mentioned something
that
might be understood
with an understanding
that is acceptable
and not acceptable. You need to have doubt
around his speech.
And one can
misunderstand
it
due
to some words that have been used
and his speech not being clear
as it should be.
And secondly,
the double standards of SP.
Salafi Publications
also known as SBOPS.
And
the third thing that I wanna speak about
is the childish behavior
of Abdullahi Al Hammami.
So the first point Ikhwani,
I want to speak about the statement that
Ustad Abdul Abdulhurman, our brother Ustad Abdulhurman Hassan,
he mentioned regarding the Khawarij.
When he mentioned that the prophet Sallallahu Alaihi
Wasallam praised them.
What was the intended purpose behind this?
Was the brother
trying to water down the fact that they
are Khwarij,
even though I personally don't agree,
or I feel it was more preferable that
he didn't use the word praise.
All what the Prophet was trying to do
is explain to the people that these people
had Sifaat
memduha.
They had characteristics that were praiseworthy.
And at the same time their characteristics
that are praiseworthy,
it doesn't necessity that these people are
guided individuals
rather they are.
If we now bring an example of a
fasik, a fasik.
Someone that does zina, he steals, he kills.
But at the same time, he prays the
prayer like no other.
And he fasts.
If we mention now the Sifaat al Mamduhah,
these praiseworthy
characteristics,
does that take away from the fact that
he's still a fasrq?
The Qasi and the Dani
could
see the intended purpose of Ustad Abdul Muhammad
Hasan when he made the video.
Not at one time was he trying to
water down that these people are Khawarij or
that these people are
upon a methodology that is correct.
As you can see from the works of
the brother, how many videos does he have
on the issue of ISIS?
Most recently,
a video was uploaded on my channel.
Where he spoke about our ISIS Khawarij.
Where he refuted them, spoke negatively about them
and destroyed their Shubahat.
And if anyone wants to go back to
me, you can go back to that video
on my channel.
Our ISIS Khawarij.
And the brother even clearly mentioned
clearly mentioned
the Hadith and the narrations where the prophet
sallallahu alaihi wa sallam refuted the Khawarij
as it's clear in the video part 4.
And the funny thing is Ikhwan,
the speech of Ibn Taymah Rahimu Allahu Ta'ala
was cut out.
Because he would have made it more clear
for the reader,
or the one that was watching the video,
what the brother, may Allah
preserve and was speaking about.
To show you the better and the talbiste
of some of these brothers. They cut out
the speech of Ibn Taymih Rahimu Allahu Ta'ala.
And that would have made it more clear.
What the intended purpose was. Taib.
What is the mohhif of ahlulunati wal jama'a
when it comes to
now hearing a statement from a person who
is known to be upon the Sunnah?
How do we handle this matter? If his
speech now
has ambiguity
and it is unclear.
And
the statement that he mentioned carries a meaning
that is acceptable
and unacceptable.
Because we know the brother Abdulhamal Hassan,
he is someone that is known to be
upon the sunnah.
His YouTube channel.
Everybody can see what he's teaching, what he's
calling to, the Salafi that he's teaching, the
Ahlul Bil'ah that he's refuting.
Wallahi Allahu, these brothers are speaking.
We haven't seen
the kind of content that has been taught
by a brother.
In maybe the 20 years, the 20 years
they've been given dawasalafiya.
Dawasalafiya
they've been given.
And you find statements
like,
I knew Salafiya before you even knew what
a sandwich was. Taib, you've been in Dawah
Salafiya for 25 years.
Where are the books? Where is the content
that you have taught?
And you wanna question the prophet Salafiya.
And at the same time, I'm not saying
that if someone now is teaching the books
of Salafiya,
it automatically makes him a Salafi. I'll make
that clear as well because this gets twisted
again. Sheikh Zayd al Midkali
was asked a question.
And we will only stick to Shahzayd al
Mutkali because these brothers they take from him.
Maybe we mentioned other scholars who are known
to be among the sunnah.
They'll be buried and maybe put to the
side. Why? Because there's question marks around them,
question marks around them, and their had is
not clear. Or maybe because they defend Fulan
and such. So and so, we'll stick to
Sheikh Zayed Al Metkali because our brother is
from SP.
They like him and they take from him.
He was asked a question.
Hamlul Kalamyaalal Mahmalil Hassan.
Pushing the statement
of an individual to its correct meaning.
Is something that many people they keep calling
to.
So we ask the question.
What is the general principle when it comes
to carrying someone's speech to a good meeting?
And should there be a differentiation?
Or should we
now make it distinct between
the statement of a Sunni, someone that's upon
the sunnah and Salafiya
and someone that is other than him.
What is the general principle?
So the shaykh, may Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala
have mercy upon him, he said,
Amma
bad. Rather the kind of speech
that should be given a correct meaning.
And it is necessary that we should give
it a good
assumption and a good thought. Yeah. I need
the person that says this word.
It is the individual now
who is from the people of knowledge.
The legislated knowledge.
The one now that treads upon the honorable
Quran.
And
he treads upon this pure
Sunnah with the correct understanding.
Wal a'riena alayhabin Nawajidi.
And those who hold on to it with
the mawlah teeth.
Whether it be nana and those who defend
it.
And with that which Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala
has given them of knowledge.
And also with
the wisdom that Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala has
given them in their Dawah.
These people if something now becomes apparent from
them. Omin ahadhim
or any of
them.
Hadith al Mafi ai mawduur inma.
Any speech
in whatever it might be.
And
their speech
consists of that which might be accepted or
some of it might be accepted.
Oh,
hadith
And their speech now consists and it holds
a meaning that is accepted and not accepted.
So Shamila is correct and something that
might be thought of to be incorrect.
This kind of speech,
in this kind of situation
should be given a good assumption.
And this kind of individual,
we should think good of him.
And at the same time,
we are most eager in trying to clarify
the correct stance and also elaborating it for
the people.
So, there is no confusion that remains amongst
the people.
Liyanal haqqawahid
Because the
truth
is
1.
It is not something that
scatters around.
The haqq is
The truth is
So we have to ask ourselves now a
question, and I repeat this again. Is the
brother Abdul Rahman Hassan
someone
who is known to be upon the sunnah?
Someone that defends the sunnah?
Someone that goes to the Quran and the
sunnah when he speaks? Does he say something
that he doesn't have anyone preceding him on
that?
And that reminds me now of the statement
of
Imam Ahmed that Imam Al Albani used to
always repeat,
beware of speaking about a matter that you
don't have anyone preceding you on it.
Videos, Arman Sur. The prophet's videos, Arman Sur,
on his YouTube channel.
The Rudu that he has done, their refutations
against the people of innovation,
the books that he has taught.
That Wallahi, we don't find Allah of these
brothers who are speaking.
Even come close to teaching some of the
basic books that the brother has taught.
And some of the other books that are
coming out.
And at the same time, I'm gonna make
something clear.
Before someone now takes my speech and distorts
it and takes it out of context.
Because we've learned to keep doing this now
as you look and all see
how some of the statements of our brother
has now been taken out of context.
I do not intend by my speech that
if someone is teaching the books of the
Sunnah, that he now automatically becomes a person
of the Sunnah.
Because someone of bita'aat the tafirs, they teach
usul al salata.
That doesn't mean now that they are the
people of the Sunnah and Salafis.
I thought I just make that clear.
And at the same time, I don't intend
by it.
Carrying the speeches of Bahlul Bidaywadwal Balaala and
giving the speeches a good meaning. La abadan.
And this is what
Sheikhzaid al Midkhari rahimawallahu ta'ala mentioned also in
the same fitwa.
As for those that have been now afflicted
with the sickness of ignorance
and the sickness of doubts, and desires.
If something now becomes apparent from these people,
a
harm that is now going to harm the
Islam and the Muslimin.
A misguided innovation
or a mistake
that is based upon. And
That is based upon following desires and a
person being amazed with his opinion.
Or this person is trying to imitate a
certain ideology.
And his mistakes are more
than that which he is correcting.
And the harms are more greater than his
benefit.
And his misguidance
is more apparent than his guidance.
Whoever's affair is like this now, the characteristics
that we have just mentioned.
We shouldn't have good thought and have good
assumptions for this individual.
And we shouldn't now also
try and search for
excuses
for the mistakes that this person does.
With that which they have written down or
that which they have spread.
In Wasayi Al Nasar,
the means of spreading things whether it is
the newspaper, whether it is the websites, whether
it is the internet,
social networking websites. If any of these people
of innovation,
someone who's known to be a bomb is
guidance, ignorance,
treading a demon ideology. If they say something
now,
that holds a meaning that is correct and
holds a meaning that is
incorrect.
We do not give these people Shushnawwani.
We do not give these people Shushnawwani
evident.
This is only now for the people of
the Sunnah.
And also, Umar ibn Khattab,
Radhiallahu Anhu, he said,
Do not think now of a speech that
has now
left the mouth of your brother
when you're able to give it a good
meaning.
These kind of athaar,
and when Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala says,
Always who believe.
Stay away from the many thoughts.
Some of the thoughts is sin.
And when also the Prophet sallallahu alaihi wa
sallam mentioned as Sahih Muslim.
Beware of assumptions.
For indeed, this assumptions is the most fabricated
narration.
These are hadith which tell us to have
good thought.
It is applied
upon those
who we know to be from the people
of the Sunnah. Especially when they say something.
Especially when they say something
that holds a meaning that is correct and
incorrect.
So in this kind of case, as you
are all aware, the Brahma,
and I'll repeat this now for the 3rd
time.
His intended purpose
wasn't to water down
the menhaj of the Khwarij.
Rather, it was only to clarify to the
people that these sifat that they had,
they were sifaats
that were Mamduh.
They were sifaats that were
praiseworthy.
And the fact that they had praiseworthy Sifa'ats,
it doesn't take away
from the fact that they are Khawarij Bulal.
And the second point I wanna move on,
which
really really amazes me.
Is how some of these brothers they jumped
on Abdul Rahm Al Hassan.
When he said this speech. Waya'arif alqasi with
Daniel Maqsood. Every single person who has any
sort of intellect that is watching the video
can understand from it that he's not defending
the Khwarij.
Or he's trying to water down the mannage
of the Khwarij.
Is the double standard of S pubs
and Dawu Sunnah.
Abu Khadija,
he recently posted something on Twitter
where he praised
the understanding of Barack Obama
and also David Cameron.
Double standard.
Why did you not go running to the
Mashaikh
to ask about Abdul Rahman Hassan?
And at the same time, the same context,
what he was speaking about
was mentioned to the mashaikh waynal aidel.
And at the same time, you lot keep
quiet about your brother, your boy, Abu Khadija
who is praising
Barack Obama and David Cameron.
Why don't you go back to the Masheikh
and also ask?
What do you say about the Da'iyah?
Who is saying such and such about Barack
Obama and also David Cameron?
What happened now to speak in the Haqq
against even your close relatives?
Oh, you
who believe.
Be steadfast
upon being fair.
Witnesses of Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala. Even if
it is against yourself.
Oinal Warlideen, or your parents.
Oinal Akramin, or your close relatives.
Also, Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala,
he says to us in the Quran,
We have made you a Khalif upon the
earth.
Rule between the people with truth.
Do not follow desires.
And it will misguide you away from the
correct path.
It was narrated by Imam Ahmed and also
Imam Muslim.
That
Ubad ibn Assamatir radiAllahu anhu, he came to
the prophet sallallahu alaihi wa sallam, and he
said,
We gave our oath of allegiance to the
prophet sallallahu alaihi wa sallam, that we listen
and obey.
In times of ease and times of hardship,
and when we are being treated unfairly,
And that we don't go against the ruler
until we see clear cut infidelity.
And we say the truth wherever we are.
And we do not fear the blamer, the
blamers.
Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala says,
Come forth with the Haqq, you Muhammad.
And turn away from the politics.
What happened to now to speaking the Haqq
even against your close relatives?
This is now your boy speaking.
And all of you are quiet, not saying
anything about Abu Khadija when he came out
and said this apparently
openly to the public,
what happened to asking the mashaikh about that
statement?
What happened to rebuking the statement of Abu
Khadija? Are we now going to apply the
principle of the
We excuse ourselves in the matters that we
have differed in.
Hasan al Banna.
Ikhwan al Muslimeen.
They stay quiet about their mistakes.
When is their boys?
They stay quiet. When it's someone else, they
are first to jump and speak about him
like that which has happened basically right now.
Nobody's saying anything about Abu Khadija.
Abu Khadija's circuit
and the rest of the gang are chucking
things that, Abdul Rahman Hassan.
Do not
allow the hatred that you have for someone
in being fair.
Being fair,
Be fair. It is more closer to taqwa.
Brothers and sisters, anyone that's watching this video
can understand the Zul that is taking place
here.
The double standards.
Look how some of them who hadithin,
ahlulhadith.
Na'am, ahlulhadith.
Where when it came to even speaking against
their close relatives.
Khatib ul Baghdadi,
Rahimahullah
ta'ala, he mentioned in his kitab Sharafu as
Haibil Hadith.
In his kitab,
the honor of the people of Hadith.
There's no one
from the people of Hadith
who will show love.
When it comes to Hadith to his father,
when
it comes to his brother or even his
son.
Yani,
when it comes to the issue of Al
Hadid,
the Haqq and speaking about your
close relatives,
pushing forward the narrations takes precedence
you having emotions for your brothers and sisters
that are close to you.
Yeah. And if you have to now do
Jarrah,
disparage your father,
or your son, or your mother,
or your uncle, or your cousin.
So that the people don't take Hadith from
him, you have to do it. And this
is what the people of Hadith were known
for.
And an example of this is Ali
ibn Abdillah Madini, the
Imam. He was an Imam in Hadith when
it came to his time.
He mentioned
after he was asked
faqala.
He was asked about his father.
He said ask someone else about the situation
of my father.
They said to him we're asking you.
It means he went silent
for a few moments
due to maybe fear.
Because this is father that he's speaking about.
An Ariel Madini, he knows that
that the truth,
the religion of Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala takes
precedence. So look at his reaction.
So Marafa Arah Sahuh. He shook it off,
and he put his head up.
This is the religion.
My father is weak.
Who did he give precedence to? He gave
precedence to the religion of Allah Subhanahu Wa
Ta'ala. He made Taweef of his father simply
because of what the religion of Allah azza
wa Jal.
And there's other examples as well.
You have
Abu Dawood,
the famous Muhadith,
Rahimahullah
Ta'ala.
Sulaiman ibn Ash'ath was his name. The Imam
in Hadith.
Imam Abu Dawud, Rahimahullah ta'ala was known to
compile the Hadith.
And his books are found Sunun Abi Dawood.
He said about his son,
son. Do not take
from
my son.
Whether he was correct or not, that's not
the point. The point is that Abu Dawud
Rahimahullah
Ta'ala, he spoke about his son.
And he mentioned that which he thought was
the truth.
Even though you have scholars saying that he
was wrong in what he said.
Ibn Abidahood.
But the point is the fact that he
spoke against him.
In order to preserve
Siyana to Deen, to preserve the religion of
Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala. So the hadith are
taken from the place it should be taken
from.
And so that
the narrations or the narrators that are weak,
they don't end up narrating a narration that
people take from them.
All of it was to preserve
the Hadith
and the Sunnah of the Prophet
So we say,
Youaba Khadija and his
friends
and his boys, where are you now when
it comes to all these narrations?
Is this now the people?
Is this now the situation of the people
of Hadith?
That they stay quiet
about their brothers when they are falling into
whatever they're falling in. But when it comes
to someone else, they jump on his back.
Alayhi Salim kumrajulun Rashid,
isn't there amongst you someone now
that can clarify to the people
the haqq from the baatil?
And the third point I want to go
to today insha Allahu Ta'ala,
is the childish behavior of Abdullahi Al Hammami.
And the reason why I mentioned this,
is because the brother,
from that which I have seen from him
over the last few years,
is that
when
matters are brought forth to him,
He tends to hide away.
But then he comes and he starts throwing
rocks at the people
That might go against what he thinks.
Brixton Masjid gave you a deadline
last week.
They gave you a deadline in regards to
the allegations that you made.
Silence. We didn't hear anything from you.
The brother Ustad Abdul Rahman Hassan clarified
to you that debating Ahlul Bida is part
of the religion. What did you say? You
said
debating
is a.
Silence. We didn't hear anything from you.
When it came to this issue and all
of some all of your friends, they decided
to speak about Usaida Abdulhamid Hassan, You started
retweeting, retweeting, retweeting on a Twitter.
What happened to your clarification that people waiting
for? What happened to your Tarajah?
Wallahi, the best example and best analogy that
I can make, is like a little kid
that has been caught red handed.
And then he says to his mother or
his father, It wasn't me. It was him.
It was him. He tries to take
the spotlight of himself to other people.
While waiting for you to give your answer,
what happened to it?
Brixton are waiting against the allegations that you
made.
Usid Abdul Ahmed Hassan, he made it clear
to you that the Salaf, they did this,
is not a bid'ah
as you claimed. When you ascribe to the
region of Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala which is
not there.
It was upon you to do what Abdullah
ibn Mas'ud said.
And not indulge in matters that you don't
have any knowledge about. It came in Sahih
Muslim.
Whoever knows something, Laheem say it. And whoever
doesn't know it, let him say Allahu
Alam. Why are you speaking about the region
of Allah
being quick in trying to say something?
Do not follow that which you don't have
any knowledge about.
Fine. If someone now falls into mistake.
Someone has fallen into mistake in something that
he has made in a lecture.
It's upon him to humble himself.
As the prophet sallallahu alaihi wa sallam told
us, never does a person humble himself, except
Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala raises him.
Why don't you come out and retract your
statement?
And as we previously mentioned,
it was maybe better for the brother not
to use the word praise.
But his intended purpose was wah there.
You decided to retweet on Twitter.
Tweeting the tweets
on Twitter and write stuff on there.
In some of the points that are being
put against Usid Abdul Rahman Hassan and you
try to remove
the spotlight that was on you.
When it came to clarifying the allegations that
you made, and that which you ascribe to
the religion of Allah
is saying that it is a Bid'ah.
And at the same time,
as you are aware by now,
that Sheikh Rabih Hafidahu Allahu Ta'ala,
Wallahi, we respect him. He
has a great
place
in our da'wah.
He's above our eyes and above our heads
as the Arab say.
We respect him.
Sheikh Rabi
Hafidahullahahu
Ta'ala, he mentioned that the 'aqeedah
of the Khawarij was 'aqeedah
as Salafiya.
Those that 4th, they
are Aqeedah was Aqeedah Salafiya.
Isn't this now a praise
for the Khawarij?
Why is the difference now between what Ustad
Abdul Rahman did, and what Sheikh Rabia mentioned?
Why don't we now apply the same application
to Usid Abdul
Rahman?
And now you are now going to say
the exact same thing that
you said about Usid Abdul Rahman about your
Sheikh,
Or shall I say our Sheikh, Rabi Hafizullahahu
Ta'ala?
Because wallahi, I personally take from him. I've
got his books at home and I respect
him.
Again here brothers and sisters, as you look
and see the double standard is becoming more
clear.
Things are becoming more apparent
as time goes
on, and it's only a matter of time
where Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala
will allow a person to carry on.
That Allah
will allow the Zalim
to do whatever he wants. He will give
him respite.
But when he taste him, he'll take him
hard.
And time is going on brothers and sisters
pay attention.
Abdullahi Lahmami
pay attention.
There's Dhulm that is taking place. Wallahi.
This kind of behavior is not from the
behavior of the people of the Sunnah.
Ibn Taymah Rahimullah Ta'ala mentioned,
When we speak about others,
it is mandatory
that we speak with knowledge and be fair.
La bijahalil mazoolbin. Not with ignorance and being
oppressive.
Kahali albida.
Like the situation of the people of innovation.
The people of innovation are known for this.
Also, he mentioned
in another place,
It is not permissible to even
oppress anyone even if he is a kafir.
And then he mentioned the statement of Allah
Subhanahu wa'ala yajirimanakum shalanaqawmin,
a la laata'adil Irdiluqrabulitaqwa.
We ask Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala to benefit
us from what we heard.
And to make us from those that are
Adiloon
people that are fair, and when they speak.
And they don't have double standards.
When it comes to
applying some things to maybe we'll said that
Durman,
and not applying it to our boys who
might be doing that which is worse.
Like praising Barack Obama and David Cameron.