Suhaib Webb – Usul alFiqh Reading #4

Suhaib Webb
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speakers discuss a weekly class for students to practice reading and application of reading. The class is designed to ease the conceptualization of science and to conceptualize their understanding of the subject. The definition of a "core concept" is discussed, and the importance of understanding the principles of sharia rulings is emphasized. The speakers emphasize the importance of preserving knowledge and reading ahead to stay up on their own while learning.

AI: Summary ©

00:02:33 --> 00:02:34
			We send peace and blessings upon
		
00:02:35 --> 00:02:38
			our beloved messenger, Muhammad, sallallahu alayhi wa sallam,
		
00:02:39 --> 00:02:42
			on his family, his companions, and those who
		
00:02:42 --> 00:02:44
			follow them till the end of time.
		
00:02:49 --> 00:02:51
			So, this is our weekly gathering,
		
00:02:52 --> 00:02:54
			reading from a text. Actually, I have a
		
00:02:54 --> 00:02:55
			copy of it for you,
		
00:02:56 --> 00:02:57
			I see you,
		
00:02:57 --> 00:02:58
			here.
		
00:02:59 --> 00:02:59
			Called,
		
00:03:03 --> 00:03:05
			by one of the great, you know, great
		
00:03:05 --> 00:03:07
			contemporary thinkers and academics
		
00:03:10 --> 00:03:10
			in.
		
00:03:11 --> 00:03:12
			Doctor Shaban,
		
00:03:15 --> 00:03:16
			Al Azharie
		
00:03:16 --> 00:03:17
			Rahimullah,
		
00:03:17 --> 00:03:19
			was a professor in Umu Qurah
		
00:03:20 --> 00:03:21
			for a number of years and did, like,
		
00:03:21 --> 00:03:22
			a lot of work,
		
00:03:23 --> 00:03:24
			in the fields
		
00:03:25 --> 00:03:25
			of
		
00:03:26 --> 00:03:26
			and
		
00:03:27 --> 00:03:28
			also
		
00:03:29 --> 00:03:31
			to bless him and to raise his status.
		
00:03:32 --> 00:03:34
			I I mentioned to Sajjad that this text
		
00:03:34 --> 00:03:36
			is really preparing us and giving us, like,
		
00:03:36 --> 00:03:39
			a broader sort of literacy so that if
		
00:03:39 --> 00:03:40
			we read the classics,
		
00:03:41 --> 00:03:42
			the classical text,
		
00:03:43 --> 00:03:44
			it will
		
00:03:45 --> 00:03:45
			facilitate
		
00:03:46 --> 00:03:48
			our our engagement with those texts.
		
00:03:50 --> 00:03:52
			So we'll start who's ready to read.
		
00:03:52 --> 00:03:54
			We need someone to read for us to
		
00:03:54 --> 00:03:55
			do it. So
		
00:03:55 --> 00:03:58
			if someone is ready to read, they can
		
00:03:58 --> 00:03:59
			unmute themselves.
		
00:04:00 --> 00:04:01
			We can get started.
		
00:04:30 --> 00:04:31
			I'm just trying to the page.
		
00:04:32 --> 00:04:34
			No problem. Page 9.
		
00:04:36 --> 00:04:37
			And if someone's not able to read it,
		
00:04:37 --> 00:04:39
			it's okay. Like, it's not
		
00:04:40 --> 00:04:43
			but one of the reasons that Sajjad wanted
		
00:04:43 --> 00:04:45
			to have this class, and he's joining us
		
00:04:45 --> 00:04:45
			soon,
		
00:04:46 --> 00:04:48
			is to practice his reading and his application
		
00:04:48 --> 00:04:50
			of reading and also to
		
00:04:51 --> 00:04:53
			sort of get ready for other other text,
		
00:04:53 --> 00:04:54
			that we'll read in the future.
		
00:05:08 --> 00:05:08
			No.
		
00:06:11 --> 00:06:14
			Because sometimes you don't mention the well
		
00:06:15 --> 00:06:17
			to show that they are
		
00:06:18 --> 00:06:19
			as one part.
		
00:06:21 --> 00:06:22
			You understand?
		
00:06:23 --> 00:06:24
			Mhmm.
		
00:06:26 --> 00:06:27
			I don't know if you studied this in
		
00:06:27 --> 00:06:28
			South Africa.
		
00:06:29 --> 00:06:30
			For example,
		
00:06:39 --> 00:06:40
			As though
		
00:06:43 --> 00:06:45
			are are
		
00:06:47 --> 00:06:50
			Same thing sometimes if you wanna praise somebody,
		
00:06:50 --> 00:06:52
			you don't use well.
		
00:06:54 --> 00:06:54
			It's called.
		
00:06:57 --> 00:06:59
			Is so important in rhetoric. Yeah. Sheikh Omar
		
00:07:00 --> 00:07:01
			some
		
00:07:01 --> 00:07:02
			they
		
00:07:06 --> 00:07:09
			said What's sad now is if you ask
		
00:07:09 --> 00:07:11
			even people who stand what's
		
00:07:13 --> 00:07:15
			and what they're gonna tell you.
		
00:07:20 --> 00:07:22
			What do you think they're gonna say?
		
00:07:23 --> 00:07:26
			They they won't know. Yeah. Like, can I
		
00:07:26 --> 00:07:27
			have the
		
00:07:30 --> 00:07:31
			You know?
		
00:07:34 --> 00:07:37
			So sometimes you don't use the wow.
		
00:07:39 --> 00:07:40
			The well of conjunction
		
00:07:41 --> 00:07:44
			to show they're all parts, but it's like
		
00:07:44 --> 00:07:45
			they're all the same in one whole.
		
00:07:46 --> 00:07:47
			You understand?
		
00:07:48 --> 00:07:49
			Okay.
		
00:07:49 --> 00:07:50
			So Allah
		
00:07:51 --> 00:07:51
			says,
		
00:07:51 --> 00:07:52
			in
		
00:08:09 --> 00:08:11
			And not then what after that?
		
00:08:16 --> 00:08:16
			Why
		
00:08:21 --> 00:08:21
			Why
		
00:08:22 --> 00:08:25
			the opposite to show you that they perfected
		
00:08:25 --> 00:08:27
			each one of these qualities
		
00:08:28 --> 00:08:29
			individually
		
00:08:30 --> 00:08:32
			as though they're like they did each one
		
00:08:32 --> 00:08:33
			of them so well. It's like
		
00:08:34 --> 00:08:36
			like, it's 1, but they did each one
		
00:08:36 --> 00:08:37
			on its own.
		
00:08:38 --> 00:08:39
			You know, like, what do we learn? You
		
00:08:39 --> 00:08:42
			learn Nahu, you master Nahu, then Sarf, master
		
00:08:42 --> 00:08:45
			Sarf, then Balaga, master Balaga. Right? So here,
		
00:08:53 --> 00:08:54
			As though each one of those, they took
		
00:08:54 --> 00:08:56
			time to perfect them all.
		
00:08:56 --> 00:08:59
			The opposite without the wow
		
00:08:59 --> 00:09:02
			to show that all of those brought together
		
00:09:03 --> 00:09:03
			is like 1.
		
00:09:05 --> 00:09:06
			So here, when the sheikh, he only mentions
		
00:09:06 --> 00:09:07
			one well
		
00:09:08 --> 00:09:10
			and the rest he doesn't mention well, to
		
00:09:10 --> 00:09:13
			show all these parts are integral and essential
		
00:09:13 --> 00:09:15
			to make up the whole
		
00:09:20 --> 00:09:21
			of. You understand?
		
00:09:30 --> 00:09:31
			For example,
		
00:09:37 --> 00:09:38
			the or
		
00:09:41 --> 00:09:42
			Why?
		
00:09:44 --> 00:09:44
			This is called.
		
00:09:47 --> 00:09:49
			If you think about it, it's like a
		
00:09:49 --> 00:09:50
			run on sentence. Yeah. We're
		
00:09:54 --> 00:09:55
			doing well.
		
00:09:56 --> 00:09:58
			To give you the feeling of congruence,
		
00:10:01 --> 00:10:02
			and this is very important.
		
00:10:06 --> 00:10:08
			That's why he said, this is the this
		
00:10:08 --> 00:10:08
			is
		
00:10:14 --> 00:10:15
			That can have
		
00:10:21 --> 00:10:23
			It's it's a very important sign. So here,
		
00:10:23 --> 00:10:26
			this is what's happening. He is not mentioning
		
00:10:26 --> 00:10:27
			the just like
		
00:10:29 --> 00:10:31
			to show you that all of these different
		
00:10:31 --> 00:10:32
			things are
		
00:10:34 --> 00:10:34
			as one
		
00:10:36 --> 00:10:37
			foundation for.
		
00:10:41 --> 00:10:42
			No.
		
00:11:04 --> 00:11:05
			No.
		
00:11:06 --> 00:11:06
			No.
		
00:11:16 --> 00:11:17
			Is the master of What?
		
00:11:31 --> 00:11:33
			No. And as we see in the future,
		
00:11:33 --> 00:11:36
			actually, these go hand in hand. No problem
		
00:11:36 --> 00:11:38
			if your mic's not working. No problem. So
		
00:11:53 --> 00:11:54
			Okay? Like in
		
00:11:58 --> 00:12:00
			as we're gonna see in the future.
		
00:12:15 --> 00:12:16
			So this section,
		
00:12:16 --> 00:12:19
			he's going to cover these These are
		
00:12:21 --> 00:12:22
			from
		
00:12:22 --> 00:12:23
			to start.
		
00:12:24 --> 00:12:25
			So are those 10
		
00:12:26 --> 00:12:28
			what most gotta say 10 things you need
		
00:12:28 --> 00:12:29
			to know
		
00:12:29 --> 00:12:31
			before you start to study.
		
00:12:32 --> 00:12:33
			The purpose of the mabbetic
		
00:12:34 --> 00:12:36
			is to ease your
		
00:12:38 --> 00:12:38
			conceptualization
		
00:12:39 --> 00:12:40
			of a science.
		
00:12:42 --> 00:12:44
			So for example, if I say to you,
		
00:12:45 --> 00:12:45
			the knowledge
		
00:12:46 --> 00:12:48
			of the rule the now the knowledge
		
00:12:49 --> 00:12:50
			of the vowels
		
00:12:51 --> 00:12:52
			at the end of words
		
00:12:52 --> 00:12:53
			to indicate
		
00:12:54 --> 00:12:57
			the place of the word in a sentence.
		
00:12:58 --> 00:13:00
			What am I talking about?
		
00:13:04 --> 00:13:05
			If I say
		
00:13:23 --> 00:13:24
			What am I talking about right now?
		
00:13:25 --> 00:13:25
			Grammar?
		
00:13:27 --> 00:13:28
			Whenever I say
		
00:13:37 --> 00:13:37
			came out,
		
00:13:38 --> 00:13:42
			Iowa. Shuf Shufth, how you immediately you understood.
		
00:13:43 --> 00:13:45
			So this that's only one of the 10.
		
00:13:47 --> 00:13:49
			So now you see something. Even I I
		
00:13:49 --> 00:13:51
			didn't give even the correct definitions. Right? I'm
		
00:13:51 --> 00:13:53
			just going from the don't.
		
00:13:53 --> 00:13:54
			But the point is
		
00:13:55 --> 00:13:58
			I gave these 2 just the definition, and
		
00:13:58 --> 00:14:00
			immediately you knew what I was talking about.
		
00:14:00 --> 00:14:01
			So
		
00:14:02 --> 00:14:03
			from that, you can understand
		
00:14:04 --> 00:14:06
			that the fruit of the is
		
00:14:06 --> 00:14:09
			to know what is being talked about and
		
00:14:09 --> 00:14:12
			to conceptualize it, to see it in your
		
00:14:12 --> 00:14:12
			mind.
		
00:14:13 --> 00:14:14
			Those
		
00:14:15 --> 00:14:17
			still they teach it in middle school, in
		
00:14:17 --> 00:14:17
			the Azhar,
		
00:14:18 --> 00:14:19
			and in the beginning of high school.
		
00:14:21 --> 00:14:22
			In Azhar, the Adam program.
		
00:14:23 --> 00:14:25
			And Sheikh Saban
		
00:14:25 --> 00:14:28
			Rahim Hula, he wrote in a poem. He
		
00:14:28 --> 00:14:28
			said,
		
00:14:31 --> 00:14:33
			The are 10.
		
00:14:35 --> 00:14:36
			The first is his definition.
		
00:14:41 --> 00:14:43
			The second from the 10, is
		
00:14:43 --> 00:14:45
			what what does that
		
00:14:45 --> 00:14:47
			subject talk about?
		
00:14:48 --> 00:14:49
			So
		
00:14:50 --> 00:14:53
			what's the fruit? Like, what's the value
		
00:14:54 --> 00:14:54
			of studying
		
00:14:55 --> 00:14:56
			any subject?
		
00:14:56 --> 00:14:57
			What is?
		
00:14:58 --> 00:14:58
			What
		
00:14:59 --> 00:15:01
			faculty does it belong to?
		
00:15:03 --> 00:15:05
			What's the virtues in the hereafter
		
00:15:07 --> 00:15:07
			of studying
		
00:15:09 --> 00:15:11
			it? Who's the one who organized it
		
00:15:12 --> 00:15:13
			So that you can learn it, so that
		
00:15:13 --> 00:15:14
			you could study
		
00:15:14 --> 00:15:15
			it.
		
00:15:15 --> 00:15:19
			Its name. There's a difference between definition and
		
00:15:19 --> 00:15:19
			name.
		
00:15:20 --> 00:15:22
			Something may have the same name but a
		
00:15:22 --> 00:15:23
			different definition.
		
00:15:27 --> 00:15:28
			Everything is,
		
00:15:28 --> 00:15:30
			but the different definition of a human is
		
00:15:30 --> 00:15:32
			not the same as the definition of an
		
00:15:32 --> 00:15:33
			animal.
		
00:15:34 --> 00:15:35
			For him,
		
00:15:47 --> 00:15:49
			What are the prerequisites you need before you
		
00:15:49 --> 00:15:50
			study the subject?
		
00:15:53 --> 00:15:53
			What's the ruling?
		
00:15:55 --> 00:15:57
			So here, I gave you just a few
		
00:15:57 --> 00:15:58
			of them from the poem of
		
00:16:02 --> 00:16:03
			When he says,
		
00:16:05 --> 00:16:08
			you know, the the these starting points of
		
00:16:08 --> 00:16:10
			any science are
		
00:16:14 --> 00:16:14
			art in. Its definition.
		
00:16:15 --> 00:16:17
			Its contents. What does it address?
		
00:16:19 --> 00:16:20
			Its fruit.
		
00:16:23 --> 00:16:24
			It's
		
00:16:25 --> 00:16:25
			faculty,
		
00:16:27 --> 00:16:28
			its virtue in the hereafter,
		
00:16:30 --> 00:16:33
			and who is the first person to organize
		
00:16:33 --> 00:16:35
			it as a as a form of study.
		
00:16:43 --> 00:16:44
			Its name,
		
00:16:45 --> 00:16:45
			its prerequisites,
		
00:16:46 --> 00:16:48
			and its ruling. Is it is
		
00:16:48 --> 00:16:50
			it is it? Is
		
00:16:51 --> 00:16:51
			it
		
00:16:52 --> 00:16:52
			Is
		
00:16:53 --> 00:16:55
			it? What are the things it seeks to
		
00:16:55 --> 00:16:56
			address?
		
00:17:01 --> 00:17:03
			Then he said, you know, after that,
		
00:17:04 --> 00:17:05
			some of them said you can just learn
		
00:17:05 --> 00:17:06
			a few of those 10. Some of them
		
00:17:06 --> 00:17:08
			said you should learn you should learn all
		
00:17:08 --> 00:17:09
			of them if you really want to be,
		
00:17:09 --> 00:17:11
			like, strong. So what are the?
		
00:17:12 --> 00:17:14
			I'm gonna say them again easy easily so
		
00:17:14 --> 00:17:15
			you can remember
		
00:17:16 --> 00:17:17
			them. Number 1 is the definition.
		
00:17:18 --> 00:17:19
			Number 2 is its
		
00:17:20 --> 00:17:21
			subject matters.
		
00:17:21 --> 00:17:24
			Number number 3 is its fruit.
		
00:17:25 --> 00:17:27
			Number 4 is its
		
00:17:28 --> 00:17:31
			faculty. Number 5 is its virtues in the.
		
00:17:31 --> 00:17:34
			Number 6 is who organized the subject
		
00:17:35 --> 00:17:36
			to be taught?
		
00:17:39 --> 00:17:42
			Number 7, its name. Number 8, its prerequisites.
		
00:17:43 --> 00:17:44
			Number 9, it's.
		
00:17:45 --> 00:17:48
			Number 10, what are the questions
		
00:17:49 --> 00:17:50
			that it addresses?
		
00:17:56 --> 00:17:57
			Yes.
		
00:17:59 --> 00:18:00
			Then he said,
		
00:18:01 --> 00:18:02
			he
		
00:18:08 --> 00:18:10
			says has 2 type of definitions.
		
00:18:15 --> 00:18:18
			The first is in regards to it being
		
00:18:18 --> 00:18:21
			a possessive word made of 2 nouns.
		
00:18:27 --> 00:18:30
			And the second is with regards to it
		
00:18:30 --> 00:18:33
			being a title, an official title of the
		
00:18:33 --> 00:18:34
			actual subject.
		
00:18:36 --> 00:18:38
			You see early scholars, they taught it using
		
00:18:38 --> 00:18:42
			both. You find Imam Masukki in Jema'at Joanna.
		
00:18:42 --> 00:18:45
			He restricts it, sorry, Al Bairawi and Al
		
00:18:45 --> 00:18:46
			Minhaj.
		
00:18:47 --> 00:18:49
			He only uses this.
		
00:18:50 --> 00:18:53
			Most scholars still do this part, introducing it
		
00:18:53 --> 00:18:55
			as a possessive word
		
00:18:55 --> 00:18:58
			just so they can help the student understand
		
00:18:58 --> 00:18:58
			better.
		
00:18:59 --> 00:19:02
			Some scholars, they just use this definition only
		
00:19:02 --> 00:19:04
			to make it easy for people. So it
		
00:19:04 --> 00:19:06
			depends on who you're teaching.
		
00:19:11 --> 00:19:13
			So the first is regards to it being
		
00:19:13 --> 00:19:13
			a possessive
		
00:19:35 --> 00:19:36
			So what he's saying is each one of
		
00:19:36 --> 00:19:37
			those words
		
00:19:37 --> 00:19:38
			they have their own meaning.
		
00:19:40 --> 00:19:42
			They have their own independent
		
00:19:47 --> 00:19:49
			being. For you
		
00:19:49 --> 00:19:51
			to appreciate and understand,
		
00:19:53 --> 00:19:55
			this, you have to understand each word.
		
00:20:02 --> 00:20:03
			So the word
		
00:20:04 --> 00:20:06
			is the plural of
		
00:20:12 --> 00:20:13
			while And the word
		
00:20:14 --> 00:20:17
			in the language is applied to a number
		
00:20:17 --> 00:20:19
			of meanings, and they're gonna go through some
		
00:20:19 --> 00:20:19
			of them.
		
00:20:24 --> 00:20:26
			That which other things are built on.
		
00:20:31 --> 00:20:33
			What is others needed?
		
00:20:44 --> 00:20:46
			In order for something to exist, it has
		
00:20:46 --> 00:20:48
			to it has to rely on it. It
		
00:20:48 --> 00:20:50
			has to rest on it. And this is
		
00:20:50 --> 00:20:51
			the definition of
		
00:20:52 --> 00:20:53
			the
		
00:20:54 --> 00:20:57
			All these are super close, by the way.
		
00:20:57 --> 00:20:59
			If you wanna spend a lot of time
		
00:20:59 --> 00:21:01
			in some of that larger books, they're gonna
		
00:21:01 --> 00:21:04
			go through all this and dissect it. It's
		
00:21:04 --> 00:21:06
			not our our goal here.
		
00:21:07 --> 00:21:09
			Where something else comes from.
		
00:21:11 --> 00:21:12
			Very similar to this one.
		
00:21:18 --> 00:21:21
			This is what's important for you. The word
		
00:21:22 --> 00:21:23
			in in the scholars
		
00:21:24 --> 00:21:26
			of Islamic law is applied to the following.
		
00:21:26 --> 00:21:27
			Number 1,
		
00:21:27 --> 00:21:28
			in
		
00:21:31 --> 00:21:32
			Evan
		
00:21:37 --> 00:21:40
			The sec the second meaning is what's preferred.
		
00:21:45 --> 00:21:47
			And he that the default of speech is
		
00:21:47 --> 00:21:49
			is literal, not figurative.
		
00:21:51 --> 00:21:51
			A was preferred
		
00:21:52 --> 00:21:52
			in the
		
00:21:53 --> 00:21:54
			will.
		
00:22:00 --> 00:22:03
			3rd definition of according to the language,
		
00:22:03 --> 00:22:04
			not in our science.
		
00:22:05 --> 00:22:07
			Right? According to the sorry. According to the
		
00:22:07 --> 00:22:10
			the scientific meaning within the broader Sharia
		
00:22:10 --> 00:22:11
			subjects. Excuse me.
		
00:22:14 --> 00:22:16
			Is a an axiom.
		
00:22:23 --> 00:22:25
			That it's permissible for someone who's
		
00:22:27 --> 00:22:28
			or someone who is forced
		
00:22:30 --> 00:22:30
			to eat
		
00:22:31 --> 00:22:32
			it, something that's died of itself
		
00:22:33 --> 00:22:36
			is permissible, although that goes against the. The
		
00:22:36 --> 00:22:37
			is what is haram?
		
00:22:44 --> 00:22:45
			Is part of
		
00:22:50 --> 00:22:51
			The. Says
		
00:22:55 --> 00:22:56
			just like before.
		
00:22:56 --> 00:22:59
			So here, we wanna review quickly the word.
		
00:23:00 --> 00:23:02
			According to language, don't worry about all this
		
00:23:02 --> 00:23:04
			1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Just take this
		
00:23:06 --> 00:23:07
			one.
		
00:23:12 --> 00:23:14
			If I'm teaching this, I'm not gonna teach
		
00:23:14 --> 00:23:15
			you all this stuff to to
		
00:23:15 --> 00:23:17
			even, like, 1st year students.
		
00:23:25 --> 00:23:27
			This you should mention
		
00:23:27 --> 00:23:29
			because this is, of course, related to
		
00:23:35 --> 00:23:36
			and evidence.
		
00:23:37 --> 00:23:37
			The third,
		
00:23:38 --> 00:23:40
			something which is the default preference.
		
00:23:45 --> 00:23:46
			A foundational axiom.
		
00:23:51 --> 00:23:52
			The foundation of a PS.
		
00:23:54 --> 00:23:55
			Now we're gonna move on to
		
00:24:07 --> 00:24:09
			So in language, it is applied to 3
		
00:24:09 --> 00:24:10
			meanings.
		
00:24:11 --> 00:24:12
			Number 1 again,
		
00:24:14 --> 00:24:15
			just pay attention to the one I tend
		
00:24:15 --> 00:24:17
			to pay attention to, but this is like,
		
00:24:17 --> 00:24:18
			you know,
		
00:24:18 --> 00:24:21
			sometimes these discussions, they'll they'll they'll help you
		
00:24:21 --> 00:24:21
			later on.
		
00:24:24 --> 00:24:26
			This is the definition of al Razi.
		
00:24:28 --> 00:24:29
			Al Razi says
		
00:24:30 --> 00:24:33
			is to understand the meaning of the speaker.
		
00:24:43 --> 00:24:45
			This is according to Imam Sharazi.
		
00:24:48 --> 00:24:50
			He said that the word means to understand
		
00:24:50 --> 00:24:51
			something
		
00:24:51 --> 00:24:52
			subtle.
		
00:24:52 --> 00:24:54
			And here you're going to appreciate something that
		
00:24:54 --> 00:24:57
			we'll get to later on. Sometimes, the scholars
		
00:24:57 --> 00:24:57
			of
		
00:24:58 --> 00:25:01
			took the science of language even farther than
		
00:25:01 --> 00:25:03
			the than the linguistic scholars.
		
00:25:04 --> 00:25:06
			In their context, the context of law, the
		
00:25:06 --> 00:25:07
			context of.
		
00:25:09 --> 00:25:12
			Sometimes they uncover things that those other people
		
00:25:12 --> 00:25:13
			didn't uncover.
		
00:25:15 --> 00:25:16
			The last, and this is the definition you
		
00:25:16 --> 00:25:18
			need to pay attention to,
		
00:25:19 --> 00:25:22
			That is understanding anything, whether it's
		
00:25:23 --> 00:25:26
			the speaker, whether it's something subtle, whether it's
		
00:25:26 --> 00:25:27
			something clear.
		
00:25:32 --> 00:25:33
			And this is the
		
00:25:33 --> 00:25:34
			correct opinion.
		
00:25:50 --> 00:25:52
			It just say that it has the same
		
00:25:52 --> 00:25:55
			meaning whether to understand something great, small, doesn't
		
00:25:55 --> 00:25:55
			matter.
		
00:25:57 --> 00:26:00
			Whether use it in a form, a form,
		
00:26:01 --> 00:26:02
			as a.
		
00:26:02 --> 00:26:04
			We find in the Quran here that usage.
		
00:26:06 --> 00:26:08
			What's wrong with them? They don't understand,
		
00:26:09 --> 00:26:12
			you know, this very clear conversation that's being
		
00:26:12 --> 00:26:13
			communicated to them.
		
00:26:16 --> 00:26:18
			Also, they said, like, we don't understand a
		
00:26:18 --> 00:26:19
			lot of what you're saying.
		
00:26:20 --> 00:26:22
			But then here, when it talks about something
		
00:26:22 --> 00:26:23
			subtle,
		
00:26:26 --> 00:26:27
			like you don't understand
		
00:26:29 --> 00:26:31
			They're the of the creation. So here, these
		
00:26:31 --> 00:26:32
			are things that are easily understood.
		
00:26:33 --> 00:26:35
			Here's something that's difficult to understand, but in
		
00:26:35 --> 00:26:37
			all of them, the word
		
00:26:37 --> 00:26:40
			is used. So that's why Johari go into
		
00:26:40 --> 00:26:41
			the Quran. He says, you know,
		
00:26:42 --> 00:26:42
			Allah
		
00:26:43 --> 00:26:45
			bless you guys for this, but the word
		
00:26:46 --> 00:26:46
			means
		
00:26:48 --> 00:26:50
			Maybe the response of a razi or a
		
00:26:50 --> 00:26:52
			Shirazi, if they were alive, would be, no.
		
00:26:52 --> 00:26:55
			They're talking about specifically within the science.
		
00:26:56 --> 00:26:57
			But
		
00:26:57 --> 00:26:59
			it appears that they were saying it in
		
00:26:59 --> 00:27:00
			the context of language,
		
00:27:02 --> 00:27:03
			And this is where we stopped.
		
00:27:04 --> 00:27:04
			Well, not
		
00:27:05 --> 00:27:06
			almost.
		
00:27:07 --> 00:27:08
			Well, according to
		
00:27:20 --> 00:27:22
			The is for someone to know what is
		
00:27:22 --> 00:27:23
			for them or against them. His
		
00:27:27 --> 00:27:29
			definition is so nice, man. Because it centers
		
00:27:30 --> 00:27:31
			on responsibility.
		
00:27:35 --> 00:27:37
			Person knows what's against them or
		
00:27:38 --> 00:27:39
			or in favor of them.
		
00:27:40 --> 00:27:42
			However, find here
		
00:27:42 --> 00:27:43
			the others they say
		
00:27:44 --> 00:27:45
			is the knowledge
		
00:27:45 --> 00:27:46
			of Sharia
		
00:27:47 --> 00:27:47
			rulings
		
00:27:48 --> 00:27:49
			related to actions
		
00:27:50 --> 00:27:51
			which are achieved
		
00:27:53 --> 00:27:55
			in from its detailed evidences. And we went
		
00:27:55 --> 00:27:58
			through this last time. No need to go
		
00:27:58 --> 00:27:58
			through it again,
		
00:27:59 --> 00:28:00
			Khalas.
		
00:28:00 --> 00:28:02
			And you can go back and read it.
		
00:28:02 --> 00:28:04
			We talked about this definition, and we went
		
00:28:04 --> 00:28:04
			through
		
00:28:05 --> 00:28:08
			some of the subtleties of that definition. But
		
00:28:08 --> 00:28:10
			this is where we stopped, and this is
		
00:28:10 --> 00:28:12
			where we want to pick up. And then
		
00:28:12 --> 00:28:13
			we'll stop today
		
00:28:18 --> 00:28:20
			is the definition of as
		
00:28:21 --> 00:28:22
			a science.
		
00:28:23 --> 00:28:25
			Where are we now? We're talking about the,
		
00:28:25 --> 00:28:27
			those ten things needed to understand the subject.
		
00:28:27 --> 00:28:29
			We're at the first.
		
00:28:39 --> 00:28:40
			He he defined
		
00:28:44 --> 00:28:45
			as
		
00:28:46 --> 00:28:47
			a scientific definition.
		
00:28:48 --> 00:28:50
			Doesn't care about it being possessive. What does
		
00:28:50 --> 00:28:52
			each word mean? No. No. What does
		
00:28:52 --> 00:28:53
			we say?
		
00:29:01 --> 00:29:02
			Okay.
		
00:29:06 --> 00:29:08
			Was taught to us in the in the
		
00:29:08 --> 00:29:09
			college in El Azhar and also
		
00:29:14 --> 00:29:16
			is to generally know the evidence is
		
00:29:20 --> 00:29:23
			and how to benefit from those evidences. What
		
00:29:23 --> 00:29:23
			is
		
00:29:25 --> 00:29:27
			the conditions? What are the prerequisites
		
00:29:27 --> 00:29:31
			needed for a person who's going to be
		
00:29:31 --> 00:29:31
			a or
		
00:29:32 --> 00:29:33
			Mufti
		
00:29:33 --> 00:29:34
			or Faqid
		
00:29:35 --> 00:29:36
			and so on and so forth.
		
00:29:37 --> 00:29:40
			This definition he gave is not the definition
		
00:29:40 --> 00:29:40
			of the majority.
		
00:29:43 --> 00:29:44
			The definition of the majority
		
00:29:46 --> 00:29:48
			of the Malekis, the the
		
00:29:48 --> 00:29:51
			Hanbalis, and even the Hanafis is
		
00:30:08 --> 00:30:09
			He had to pay attention to this for
		
00:30:09 --> 00:30:10
			a sec.
		
00:30:12 --> 00:30:13
			The majority of the
		
00:30:16 --> 00:30:17
			they define
		
00:30:18 --> 00:30:18
			as
		
00:30:21 --> 00:30:23
			evidences and principles.
		
00:30:25 --> 00:30:26
			Used to arrive.
		
00:30:32 --> 00:30:33
			To extracting rulings.
		
00:30:35 --> 00:30:36
			Sharia rulings.
		
00:30:37 --> 00:30:38
			Al
		
00:30:38 --> 00:30:38
			Mustambata,
		
00:30:39 --> 00:30:40
			which are extracted
		
00:30:41 --> 00:30:43
			from al Adelatiha
		
00:30:43 --> 00:30:45
			at Taw Syria, from its detailed evidence.
		
00:30:47 --> 00:30:50
			If you pay attention, you notice something different.
		
00:30:51 --> 00:30:52
			But it always says,
		
00:30:54 --> 00:30:54
			but Arazi
		
00:30:56 --> 00:30:57
			and others
		
00:30:59 --> 00:31:01
			like Al Qarafi,
		
00:31:05 --> 00:31:06
			And others, they define
		
00:31:07 --> 00:31:07
			as
		
00:31:08 --> 00:31:09
			but as
		
00:31:13 --> 00:31:17
			Sheikh Zachary Al Ansari and also says
		
00:31:21 --> 00:31:22
			Imam Al Razi says,
		
00:31:26 --> 00:31:28
			It's a long discussion why some said,
		
00:31:31 --> 00:31:33
			because some people said means those things that
		
00:31:33 --> 00:31:34
			lead to,
		
00:31:35 --> 00:31:37
			but all of is not based on.
		
00:31:40 --> 00:31:43
			Yaqeen. Is also based on a guess, the
		
00:31:43 --> 00:31:45
			guess of the the guess of the scholar.
		
00:31:45 --> 00:31:47
			Right? The presumption of the scholar or the
		
00:31:47 --> 00:31:47
			adding.
		
00:31:48 --> 00:31:50
			So that's why Al Razi, he says
		
00:31:51 --> 00:31:51
			because
		
00:31:52 --> 00:31:52
			includes
		
00:32:00 --> 00:32:01
			We can talk about that in the future.
		
00:32:01 --> 00:32:02
			But
		
00:32:02 --> 00:32:03
			those scholars,
		
00:32:03 --> 00:32:04
			when they say
		
00:32:08 --> 00:32:08
			or
		
00:32:13 --> 00:32:16
			Because they're they're they're noting something very important,
		
00:32:16 --> 00:32:16
			brothers.
		
00:32:17 --> 00:32:19
			And that is that the
		
00:32:19 --> 00:32:21
			exists whether they're known or not.
		
00:32:24 --> 00:32:26
			One of my teachers used to say,
		
00:32:33 --> 00:32:33
			That,
		
00:32:35 --> 00:32:36
			foundations of
		
00:32:37 --> 00:32:40
			and its principles are the staff of a
		
00:32:40 --> 00:32:42
			blind person. Meaning, that blind person will use
		
00:32:42 --> 00:32:43
			that staff
		
00:32:44 --> 00:32:47
			for, like, in infinite usages. Meaning,
		
00:32:48 --> 00:32:51
			you're always going to discover always scholars are
		
00:32:51 --> 00:32:51
			going to undiscover
		
00:32:52 --> 00:32:52
			new
		
00:32:54 --> 00:32:56
			new principles, not new evidences,
		
00:32:56 --> 00:32:57
			but new axioms,
		
00:32:58 --> 00:33:00
			new ways to understand those evidences.
		
00:33:12 --> 00:33:12
			So
		
00:33:13 --> 00:33:14
			here, why? Because it's
		
00:33:15 --> 00:33:16
			it's not
		
00:33:16 --> 00:33:17
			is
		
00:33:17 --> 00:33:18
			not
		
00:33:18 --> 00:33:19
			is something that exist.
		
00:33:22 --> 00:33:23
			But when you say
		
00:33:25 --> 00:33:27
			now it became the definitions
		
00:33:27 --> 00:33:29
			of the science of.
		
00:33:30 --> 00:33:31
			Here you can appreciate
		
00:33:34 --> 00:33:36
			the the care of scholars of.
		
00:33:37 --> 00:33:38
			Why they would argue?
		
00:33:39 --> 00:33:41
			Maybe someone says, man, this is too much.
		
00:33:41 --> 00:33:43
			Why? Because they understood this to be a
		
00:33:43 --> 00:33:46
			a manna. They weren't lazy in their studies.
		
00:33:46 --> 00:33:48
			They weren't lazy in their studies.
		
00:33:50 --> 00:33:51
			A few weeks ago,
		
00:33:52 --> 00:33:53
			I was reading the
		
00:33:54 --> 00:33:56
			from I was reviewing it in my mind.
		
00:33:56 --> 00:33:58
			And one brother, he asked me, how did
		
00:33:58 --> 00:34:00
			you memorize it? I said, I spent a
		
00:34:00 --> 00:34:02
			lot of time with it. Hey. How do
		
00:34:02 --> 00:34:03
			you think I memorized it?
		
00:34:04 --> 00:34:05
			You think it just happened?
		
00:34:06 --> 00:34:08
			Yeah. You're just lazy, and you're gonna learn?
		
00:34:09 --> 00:34:11
			You don't work hard. You're gonna learn?
		
00:34:12 --> 00:34:15
			I remember one time I I stopped Sheikh.
		
00:34:15 --> 00:34:16
			He
		
00:34:16 --> 00:34:18
			was killed in the Arab Spring
		
00:34:18 --> 00:34:20
			in Egypt. He taught us
		
00:34:24 --> 00:34:25
			And I ran into him in the.
		
00:34:26 --> 00:34:28
			I was memorizing the at that time. I
		
00:34:28 --> 00:34:29
			hadn't finished it.
		
00:34:30 --> 00:34:31
			And I said to him, Sheikh,
		
00:34:32 --> 00:34:33
			what's the secret to memorize
		
00:34:35 --> 00:34:35
			alfiatim?
		
00:34:36 --> 00:34:37
			He looked at me like I was an
		
00:34:37 --> 00:34:38
			idiot.
		
00:34:40 --> 00:34:42
			What kind of question is this?
		
00:34:47 --> 00:34:49
			Most people want to dream,
		
00:34:50 --> 00:34:52
			but very few people want to work.
		
00:34:53 --> 00:34:55
			Even amongst the
		
00:34:56 --> 00:34:58
			very few people want to work.
		
00:34:59 --> 00:35:01
			Look at Sheikh Zechariah Al Ansari, Sheikh Islam,
		
00:35:01 --> 00:35:03
			who we just mentioned. He's buried next to
		
00:35:03 --> 00:35:05
			Imam al Shafi. You know, he went blind
		
00:35:05 --> 00:35:06
			from reading.
		
00:35:08 --> 00:35:08
			He went blind from
		
00:35:10 --> 00:35:11
			so
		
00:35:12 --> 00:35:13
			you have to work hard.
		
00:35:13 --> 00:35:16
			And look at these scholars. They understood hard
		
00:35:16 --> 00:35:18
			work, so they debated. They said, wait. Wait.
		
00:35:18 --> 00:35:19
			Wait. Wait. If you say,
		
00:35:19 --> 00:35:20
			that changes everything.
		
00:35:25 --> 00:35:26
			Had the. Like an also the fact who
		
00:35:26 --> 00:35:27
			was that?
		
00:35:29 --> 00:35:29
			Who
		
00:35:30 --> 00:35:31
			was Sheikh?
		
00:35:40 --> 00:35:41
			So here we see something amazing.
		
00:35:42 --> 00:35:44
			That until the end of time, the
		
00:35:46 --> 00:35:48
			meaning the axioms and the principles, not the
		
00:35:48 --> 00:35:50
			foundational evidence that's agreed upon. That's not gonna
		
00:35:50 --> 00:35:51
			change.
		
00:36:03 --> 00:36:05
			They will be continued to reveal, Allah subhanahu
		
00:36:05 --> 00:36:07
			wa ta'ala to those he chooses.
		
00:36:08 --> 00:36:09
			That's why Imam
		
00:36:10 --> 00:36:11
			Rahimullah,
		
00:36:11 --> 00:36:13
			there's a great statement. He says somebody can
		
00:36:13 --> 00:36:14
			read a verse, they took one lesson.
		
00:36:15 --> 00:36:17
			Somebody can read the same verse and take
		
00:36:17 --> 00:36:18
			1,000 lessons.
		
00:36:20 --> 00:36:21
			That one Allah gave.
		
00:36:22 --> 00:36:23
			So here,
		
00:36:24 --> 00:36:24
			Imam al Baydawi
		
00:36:25 --> 00:36:26
			is defining
		
00:36:27 --> 00:36:29
			as the science of Usulufir.
		
00:36:29 --> 00:36:31
			Imam al Razi, al Sarhasi,
		
00:36:32 --> 00:36:32
			those Malekis,
		
00:36:33 --> 00:36:35
			those Hanabira, those like
		
00:36:41 --> 00:36:41
			and,
		
00:36:41 --> 00:36:43
			Sheikh Zakir al Ansari,
		
00:36:44 --> 00:36:44
			they're defining
		
00:36:46 --> 00:36:48
			all as something that exist,
		
00:36:48 --> 00:36:50
			not as the knowledge of it.
		
00:36:59 --> 00:37:00
			So
		
00:37:01 --> 00:37:03
			When Al Qarafi and others say
		
00:37:15 --> 00:37:16
			They're def they're defining
		
00:37:18 --> 00:37:19
			as it is.
		
00:37:21 --> 00:37:22
			And that's why you have to be careful.
		
00:37:23 --> 00:37:24
			When you read books of,
		
00:37:25 --> 00:37:26
			you may get confused.
		
00:37:26 --> 00:37:28
			Man, this guy, he said this guy
		
00:37:29 --> 00:37:30
			says this guy says
		
00:37:30 --> 00:37:31
			this guy says
		
00:37:32 --> 00:37:34
			now you can appreciate what I just told
		
00:37:34 --> 00:37:34
			you
		
00:37:35 --> 00:37:38
			because they're coming from 2 different perspectives,
		
00:37:38 --> 00:37:40
			2 different thoughts, 2 different ways of thinking.
		
00:37:43 --> 00:37:45
			So the definition in front of us is
		
00:37:45 --> 00:37:46
			the definition as
		
00:37:51 --> 00:37:54
			as a term for studying that science,
		
00:37:55 --> 00:37:57
			not for the actual science.
		
00:37:58 --> 00:38:00
			So in reality, it's not really a big
		
00:38:00 --> 00:38:00
			difference
		
00:38:01 --> 00:38:03
			here. Each one of them has their own
		
00:38:03 --> 00:38:03
			context.
		
00:38:10 --> 00:38:13
			He took this definition from Taj Al Amuri,
		
00:38:15 --> 00:38:16
			who was a student of
		
00:38:17 --> 00:38:18
			Al
		
00:38:19 --> 00:38:19
			Razi
		
00:38:20 --> 00:38:21
			from his book, Al Masul.
		
00:38:24 --> 00:38:26
			Except there's a slight difference in the definition
		
00:38:26 --> 00:38:27
			of and,
		
00:38:33 --> 00:38:34
			Teljudeen, he says,
		
00:38:42 --> 00:38:43
			without aliphtham.
		
00:38:55 --> 00:38:56
			Here also,
		
00:38:57 --> 00:38:58
			this is a very important point
		
00:38:59 --> 00:39:01
			that will save you some trouble
		
00:39:01 --> 00:39:02
			in the future.
		
00:39:03 --> 00:39:05
			And that is Muhammed Mustafi.
		
00:39:06 --> 00:39:07
			He's talking about the.
		
00:39:10 --> 00:39:11
			But is the
		
00:39:13 --> 00:39:13
			from
		
00:39:39 --> 00:39:40
			The is not the evidences.
		
00:39:41 --> 00:39:43
			So why is it mentioned to you?
		
00:39:45 --> 00:39:47
			Why would it be mentioned to you?
		
00:39:48 --> 00:39:49
			I'm asking you guys.
		
00:40:00 --> 00:40:03
			Because because not everyone is a, so
		
00:40:05 --> 00:40:06
			one would have to
		
00:40:08 --> 00:40:09
			know who the is.
		
00:40:12 --> 00:40:14
			What do you mean by that?
		
00:40:18 --> 00:40:20
			So it's a a part of
		
00:40:20 --> 00:40:21
			is to
		
00:40:23 --> 00:40:24
			to.
		
00:40:29 --> 00:40:29
			Well,
		
00:40:35 --> 00:40:36
			Explain it more. Yeah.
		
00:40:39 --> 00:40:41
			So part of Be be confident in yourself,
		
00:40:41 --> 00:40:42
			man. Part of the
		
00:40:43 --> 00:40:44
			said it's
		
00:40:45 --> 00:40:47
			No. Because I'm thinking about it since you
		
00:40:47 --> 00:40:49
			you you pointed it out.
		
00:40:49 --> 00:40:51
			So part of the would be to know
		
00:40:51 --> 00:40:53
			who is and
		
00:40:53 --> 00:40:54
			who is not.
		
00:40:58 --> 00:41:00
			So he but is that
		
00:41:03 --> 00:41:03
			a?
		
00:41:32 --> 00:41:33
			He said what?
		
00:41:35 --> 00:41:37
			The for? The book, the sunnah,
		
00:41:38 --> 00:41:39
			consensus,
		
00:41:39 --> 00:41:40
			and analogy.
		
00:41:40 --> 00:41:41
			He didn't say the.
		
00:41:42 --> 00:41:44
			He didn't say the.
		
00:41:52 --> 00:41:53
			So Back of waste.
		
00:42:01 --> 00:42:03
			Don't be scared to share,
		
00:42:03 --> 00:42:04
			an answer
		
00:42:05 --> 00:42:06
			because, honey,
		
00:42:07 --> 00:42:09
			we're we're here as brothers. You know? And
		
00:42:09 --> 00:42:11
			it's important to be confident.
		
00:42:12 --> 00:42:14
			Yeah. I'm sure. I just I don't understand
		
00:42:14 --> 00:42:15
			really, like,
		
00:42:19 --> 00:42:21
			how did it most defeat? So it
		
00:42:24 --> 00:42:26
			so he's saying over here that
		
00:42:29 --> 00:42:31
			that that that's part of the the
		
00:42:32 --> 00:42:34
			the evidence for
		
00:42:35 --> 00:42:36
			pic.
		
00:42:37 --> 00:42:38
			No.
		
00:42:39 --> 00:42:41
			He's saying that's that's part of the what
		
00:42:41 --> 00:42:44
			makes up film. Yeah. And you don't forget
		
00:42:44 --> 00:42:45
			as well.
		
00:43:04 --> 00:43:05
			So he's saying
		
00:43:13 --> 00:43:15
			Like in what you said, I understand what
		
00:43:15 --> 00:43:17
			you mean because I didn't explain it correctly
		
00:43:17 --> 00:43:18
			to you. That's my fault.
		
00:43:18 --> 00:43:19
			Not your fault.
		
00:43:22 --> 00:43:23
			My question is,
		
00:43:24 --> 00:43:25
			is
		
00:43:28 --> 00:43:29
			from the from
		
00:43:43 --> 00:43:44
			Okay. Even
		
00:43:45 --> 00:43:46
			why why is it here?
		
00:43:47 --> 00:43:50
			Why would it be here? Like, why would
		
00:43:50 --> 00:43:51
			they add it
		
00:43:51 --> 00:43:53
			if it's not from the whole soul? That's
		
00:43:53 --> 00:43:55
			the question. That's how you wanna be constructive
		
00:43:55 --> 00:43:57
			and critical when you read.
		
00:44:00 --> 00:44:01
			This is mentioned
		
00:44:03 --> 00:44:04
			by many scholars,
		
00:44:04 --> 00:44:07
			but specifically by Imam Masuki, Tajudina
		
00:44:10 --> 00:44:11
			and. You know, after you
		
00:44:12 --> 00:44:13
			and he brought together
		
00:44:14 --> 00:44:16
			the of the Hanafis
		
00:44:17 --> 00:44:19
			and the in one book,
		
00:44:20 --> 00:44:20
			he was
		
00:44:21 --> 00:44:23
			deeply criticized for it.
		
00:44:25 --> 00:44:27
			So he wrote a book called
		
00:44:28 --> 00:44:30
			to respond to that criticism.
		
00:44:34 --> 00:44:34
			Okay?
		
00:44:35 --> 00:44:37
			And listen to what he says, bro.
		
00:44:39 --> 00:44:40
			He says,
		
00:44:52 --> 00:44:53
			What does that mean,
		
00:44:56 --> 00:44:57
			man?
		
00:45:03 --> 00:45:04
			What does that mean?
		
00:45:06 --> 00:45:09
			The discussions of each the ad are, like,
		
00:45:09 --> 00:45:09
			followers.
		
00:45:11 --> 00:45:13
			But think about it, like, not not literally.
		
00:45:13 --> 00:45:15
			Like, how would you explain it figuratively?
		
00:45:19 --> 00:45:20
			Like,
		
00:45:22 --> 00:45:23
			the the discussions of.
		
00:45:25 --> 00:45:27
			They their endpoint is the.
		
00:45:30 --> 00:45:32
			That the discussions of in Istihad, I'm gonna
		
00:45:32 --> 00:45:34
			read another statement of you also. K?
		
00:45:36 --> 00:45:37
			Hopefully, it will make it clear for you.
		
00:46:14 --> 00:46:15
			How do you understand that?
		
00:46:17 --> 00:46:19
			And and the translation would be like, it
		
00:46:19 --> 00:46:20
			it
		
00:46:21 --> 00:46:23
			it completes the objective of the?
		
00:46:24 --> 00:46:26
			Allahu Akbar. Man, good.
		
00:46:27 --> 00:46:30
			But just because something completes it doesn't mean
		
00:46:30 --> 00:46:30
			it's from it.
		
00:46:32 --> 00:46:32
			Okay.
		
00:46:33 --> 00:46:35
			Like your clothes, they complete you. But are
		
00:46:35 --> 00:46:35
			they you?
		
00:46:37 --> 00:46:37
			No.
		
00:46:39 --> 00:46:41
			So here, what Scott will say is that
		
00:46:41 --> 00:46:42
			the
		
00:46:43 --> 00:46:44
			addition of
		
00:46:46 --> 00:46:47
			into
		
00:46:48 --> 00:46:51
			is to help complete the entire
		
00:46:51 --> 00:46:52
			study of,
		
00:46:53 --> 00:46:55
			but it's actually not the evidence. It goes
		
00:46:55 --> 00:46:57
			back to the same discussion we had earlier.
		
00:46:57 --> 00:46:59
			And the is not an evident.
		
00:46:59 --> 00:47:02
			And this is where some students get confused.
		
00:47:03 --> 00:47:04
			When they study,
		
00:47:04 --> 00:47:05
			they think,
		
00:47:24 --> 00:47:25
			No.
		
00:47:25 --> 00:47:26
			Like
		
00:47:29 --> 00:47:30
			in You understand that?
		
00:47:31 --> 00:47:32
			Yes.
		
00:47:33 --> 00:47:34
			Let's hope so.
		
00:47:42 --> 00:47:43
			Then he says,
		
00:47:46 --> 00:47:47
			well,
		
00:47:50 --> 00:47:52
			everyone every scholar says this.
		
00:47:52 --> 00:47:54
			No no no scholar from
		
00:47:55 --> 00:47:55
			the
		
00:47:56 --> 00:47:58
			Sunnah says something different. Yeah. That's why we
		
00:47:58 --> 00:47:59
			say,
		
00:48:28 --> 00:48:30
			So you have, like, these 2 extremes. And
		
00:48:30 --> 00:48:32
			that's why I I have my,
		
00:48:33 --> 00:48:36
			problems with people quoting them and not saying
		
00:48:36 --> 00:48:38
			that they're not Sunni. Like, with respect.
		
00:48:38 --> 00:48:40
			Just say that they're not so people don't
		
00:48:40 --> 00:48:41
			get confused.
		
00:48:45 --> 00:48:49
			What are those evidence is a scholars differ
		
00:48:50 --> 00:48:52
			over in in the,
		
00:48:53 --> 00:48:56
			use for the
		
00:49:05 --> 00:49:07
			He says, so based on the definition of,
		
00:49:07 --> 00:49:10
			we escape three things. Number 1,
		
00:49:13 --> 00:49:15
			So anything that's not related to knowing the
		
00:49:16 --> 00:49:17
			is not
		
00:49:17 --> 00:49:18
			also like.
		
00:49:26 --> 00:49:28
			So know the evidences for different subject like
		
00:49:29 --> 00:49:29
			or.
		
00:49:32 --> 00:49:34
			It's not gonna fall under the definition.
		
00:49:34 --> 00:49:35
			Yeah.
		
00:49:37 --> 00:49:39
			Knowing some of the evidences also, it's not
		
00:49:39 --> 00:49:40
			gonna be when he said
		
00:49:59 --> 00:50:01
			So he brings his evidences, then he brings
		
00:50:01 --> 00:50:02
			an Acxiom or.
		
00:50:03 --> 00:50:05
			So we're gonna stop here because it's a
		
00:50:05 --> 00:50:06
			lot of information,
		
00:50:07 --> 00:50:08
			but you have to be patient.
		
00:50:10 --> 00:50:12
			Needs patience, and it needs
		
00:50:14 --> 00:50:15
			a lot of
		
00:50:16 --> 00:50:17
			like, you have to visit it. You have
		
00:50:17 --> 00:50:19
			to you can't just, like, take a class
		
00:50:19 --> 00:50:20
			and not study.
		
00:50:21 --> 00:50:23
			And you can't get frustrated. Oh, I don't
		
00:50:23 --> 00:50:24
			understand this.
		
00:50:25 --> 00:50:27
			If everybody gave up who didn't understand,
		
00:50:27 --> 00:50:29
			nobody will nobody will study.
		
00:50:30 --> 00:50:32
			Everybody has to encounter that frustration.
		
00:50:33 --> 00:50:35
			When they start, they feel frustrated. Man, this
		
00:50:35 --> 00:50:37
			is hard, man. Right? Yeah. It's hard. What
		
00:50:37 --> 00:50:40
			you thought? Like, what we thought. Sharia is
		
00:50:40 --> 00:50:40
			for dummies.
		
00:50:41 --> 00:50:44
			That's the problem, unfortunately, with our people. They
		
00:50:44 --> 00:50:47
			don't study in a way that's systematic and
		
00:50:47 --> 00:50:50
			organized and pushes them. So they think it's
		
00:50:50 --> 00:50:53
			yeah. You know? Everybody can study. Everybody can
		
00:50:53 --> 00:50:54
			know, and it's easy.
		
00:50:55 --> 00:50:57
			It's It's not. It's not easy.
		
00:50:57 --> 00:51:00
			So be patient, and I'm gonna help you
		
00:51:00 --> 00:51:01
			and and
		
00:51:01 --> 00:51:02
			we ask.
		
00:51:02 --> 00:51:04
			Are there any questions? You can type them
		
00:51:04 --> 00:51:05
			in the chat box or you can ask
		
00:51:05 --> 00:51:06
			them now. If not,
		
00:51:12 --> 00:51:14
			Sheikh, I was reading I was just going
		
00:51:14 --> 00:51:16
			through the book on my own, just like
		
00:51:16 --> 00:51:18
			the history of the same book.
		
00:51:19 --> 00:51:20
			Just,
		
00:51:23 --> 00:51:25
			like, the history of the
		
00:51:25 --> 00:51:28
			the the different schools of Medina and
		
00:51:30 --> 00:51:31
			of, and all of that.
		
00:51:36 --> 00:51:37
			Mhmm. Okay. So what's your question?
		
00:51:38 --> 00:51:41
			No. I'm like, yeah. That's that's fine, like,
		
00:51:42 --> 00:51:43
			to just, you know, on my own.
		
00:51:45 --> 00:51:46
			The book that we're doing now?
		
00:51:47 --> 00:51:47
			Yeah.
		
00:51:48 --> 00:51:50
			Yeah. Of course, man. You should read read
		
00:51:50 --> 00:51:50
			ahead.
		
00:51:53 --> 00:51:55
			Yeah. Yeah. Read ahead, Meadow.
		
00:51:55 --> 00:51:57
			Read ahead. And that's gonna help you also.
		
00:51:57 --> 00:51:58
			And then, also, what I used to do
		
00:51:58 --> 00:52:00
			is read ahead and then write down questions
		
00:52:00 --> 00:52:01
			I have.
		
00:52:02 --> 00:52:04
			You know? So that way, like, when I
		
00:52:04 --> 00:52:06
			go to the class, I have my questions
		
00:52:06 --> 00:52:06
			ready.
		
00:52:07 --> 00:52:08
			And I noticed when I
		
00:52:09 --> 00:52:10
			when I did that,
		
00:52:11 --> 00:52:12
			I learned better.
		
00:52:14 --> 00:52:15
			Yeah.
		
00:52:17 --> 00:52:20
			I'll I'll try doing that to writing questions.
		
00:52:20 --> 00:52:22
			And don't don't get frustrated, man.
		
00:52:25 --> 00:52:28
			Don't don't get frustrated because I'm pushing you.
		
00:52:28 --> 00:52:30
			I'm doing something else. I'm pushing you guys.
		
00:52:30 --> 00:52:30
			Look.
		
00:52:31 --> 00:52:34
			Because, you know, when you teach sometimes, you
		
00:52:34 --> 00:52:35
			wanna make sure that
		
00:52:40 --> 00:52:41
			You know? You just wanna make sure you're
		
00:52:41 --> 00:52:42
			doing right.
		
00:52:44 --> 00:52:46
			And this knowledge, it has to be preserved.
		
00:52:50 --> 00:52:51
			I can find
		
00:52:51 --> 00:52:52
			anyone
		
00:52:53 --> 00:52:55
			whenever I traveled to know someone about to
		
00:52:55 --> 00:52:55
			study.
		
00:52:55 --> 00:52:57
			17 years, man.
		
00:52:57 --> 00:53:00
			I could find someone to teach me
		
00:53:00 --> 00:53:01
			teach me
		
00:53:02 --> 00:53:03
			teach me language,
		
00:53:05 --> 00:53:08
			but I could not find people that can
		
00:53:08 --> 00:53:08
			teach.
		
00:53:09 --> 00:53:10
			It's very hard.
		
00:53:12 --> 00:53:14
			At that level where they're,
		
00:53:16 --> 00:53:17
			you know, they have that
		
00:53:18 --> 00:53:20
			ability to these books that you see here,
		
00:53:21 --> 00:53:22
			they know those books.
		
00:53:24 --> 00:53:26
			I can count them on my hand.
		
00:53:26 --> 00:53:28
			How many peep but now on YouTube,
		
00:53:28 --> 00:53:30
			you have a lot of great teachers in
		
00:53:30 --> 00:53:31
			Arabic, man.
		
00:53:32 --> 00:53:33
			And Urdu also.
		
00:53:34 --> 00:53:36
			A lot of amazing teachers.
		
00:53:37 --> 00:53:39
			But in my time, you know, there was
		
00:53:39 --> 00:53:42
			no YouTube, man. YouTube was for, like, comedy
		
00:53:42 --> 00:53:42
			and
		
00:53:42 --> 00:53:43
			stuff.
		
00:53:45 --> 00:53:47
			You said in Urdu in, in?
		
00:53:49 --> 00:53:49
			I'm sure.
		
00:53:50 --> 00:53:52
			I'm sure they're teaching.
		
00:53:56 --> 00:53:58
			You know your system better than me.
		
00:54:00 --> 00:54:02
			You, Sheikh, you mentioned,
		
00:54:03 --> 00:54:05
			mom Mamma Shashi's book,
		
00:54:08 --> 00:54:11
			not Ofudu Shashi. You mentioned, another book?
		
00:54:12 --> 00:54:13
			None.
		
00:54:14 --> 00:54:15
			It was,
		
00:54:16 --> 00:54:16
			or
		
00:54:17 --> 00:54:19
			was it Khamsin. Khamsin.
		
00:54:20 --> 00:54:21
			Khamsin. Okay.
		
00:54:34 --> 00:54:36
			It's printed. The one I have by.
		
00:54:37 --> 00:54:39
			Anna, you know, even though I'm Maliki,
		
00:54:40 --> 00:54:41
			I love the Hanafit
		
00:54:41 --> 00:54:42
			Musso names.
		
00:54:44 --> 00:54:45
			Like,
		
00:54:46 --> 00:54:46
			it's unbelievable.
		
00:54:47 --> 00:54:48
			I'll show you the print I have. It's
		
00:54:48 --> 00:54:51
			so good, man. Like, it's it's actually like
		
00:54:51 --> 00:54:53
			a as one of my teachers used to
		
00:54:53 --> 00:54:55
			say, if the notes at the bottom are
		
00:54:55 --> 00:54:57
			more than the book, usually, it means the
		
00:54:57 --> 00:54:59
			person did a good job. If they're like
		
00:54:59 --> 00:55:01
			you know, there's someone who's recognized as a
		
00:55:01 --> 00:55:02
			person of knowledge.
		
00:55:03 --> 00:55:05
			So this one, like, the the notes at
		
00:55:05 --> 00:55:08
			the bottom, because I'm not Hanafi. I'm not
		
00:55:08 --> 00:55:09
			trained in Hanafi.
		
00:55:09 --> 00:55:11
			Like, they're very helpful to me.
		
00:55:13 --> 00:55:15
			So I'll I'll I'll send you a picture
		
00:55:15 --> 00:55:15
			of it.
		
00:55:17 --> 00:55:17
			Okay.
		
00:55:20 --> 00:55:22
			Do you do you have any recommendations
		
00:55:22 --> 00:55:24
			for, like, reading on my own,
		
00:55:25 --> 00:55:25
			for?
		
00:55:26 --> 00:55:28
			Just focus on this book.
		
00:55:29 --> 00:55:29
			Okay.
		
00:55:30 --> 00:55:31
			Focus on this
		
00:55:32 --> 00:55:33
			book, and then I'm gonna send you 2
		
00:55:33 --> 00:55:35
			books that will give you the comparative Hanafi
		
00:55:35 --> 00:55:37
			also so you can stay up on your
		
00:55:37 --> 00:55:37
			own.