Suhaib Webb – Usul alFiqh Lesson TwentyOne Universals (Part Three) The Sources of Universals

Suhaib Webb
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speaker discusses the concept of universals and how they can be used as evidence for universes. They explain that words can only be used as evidences for universes and that actions with the word "na" can only be used as evidence for universes. The speaker also emphasizes the importance of teaching what is spoken and the use of "na" as an introduction for a particular action.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:13 --> 00:00:15
			Welcome back to our readings. Now
		
00:00:16 --> 00:00:17
			we reached the last section
		
00:00:18 --> 00:00:20
			in Imam Al Harami's discussion of universals.
		
00:00:21 --> 00:00:23
			And there's a little, there's a few points
		
00:00:23 --> 00:00:24
			here that have to be made that have
		
00:00:24 --> 00:00:26
			to be made. And I hope inshallah to
		
00:00:26 --> 00:00:29
			make it as easy for everyone as possible.
		
00:00:29 --> 00:00:30
			And then in the future, we can unpack
		
00:00:30 --> 00:00:32
			more and more and more and more.
		
00:00:32 --> 00:00:33
			The sheikh, he says,
		
00:00:35 --> 00:00:37
			what does that mean? According to Imam Al
		
00:00:37 --> 00:00:40
			Haramain, you can only use words as evidences
		
00:00:41 --> 00:00:41
			for universe.
		
00:00:42 --> 00:00:46
			You can only use words what's spoken, not
		
00:00:46 --> 00:00:46
			written,
		
00:00:47 --> 00:00:48
			as evidence for universes.
		
00:00:50 --> 00:00:52
			That's very important. So that means the Quran,
		
00:00:52 --> 00:00:53
			yes, but when it comes to the sunnah,
		
00:00:53 --> 00:00:55
			we know there's 3 parts to the sunnah,
		
00:00:55 --> 00:00:57
			what's spoken, what's acted on, and sound of
		
00:00:57 --> 00:00:59
			approval. So that means he's restricting a vote
		
00:00:59 --> 00:01:01
			only to what the prophet said, not what
		
00:01:01 --> 00:01:03
			he did or his sign of approvals.
		
00:01:07 --> 00:01:08
			That's why he says
		
00:01:15 --> 00:01:17
			So the entire introduction, he says
		
00:01:38 --> 00:01:39
			So here,
		
00:01:40 --> 00:01:43
			he's making some points. Number 1 is, according
		
00:01:44 --> 00:01:44
			to
		
00:01:45 --> 00:01:46
			his,
		
00:01:46 --> 00:01:47
			universes
		
00:01:48 --> 00:01:51
			can only come from what's spoken. Malachi's would
		
00:01:51 --> 00:01:51
			say no,
		
00:01:53 --> 00:01:53
			say, because
		
00:01:55 --> 00:01:56
			a action
		
00:01:56 --> 00:01:58
			after negation
		
00:01:59 --> 00:02:00
			is aan. We just learned that.
		
00:02:04 --> 00:02:06
			And in fact, we say specifically there are
		
00:02:06 --> 00:02:07
			3 scenarios
		
00:02:07 --> 00:02:09
			where this is gonna happen as an introduction
		
00:02:09 --> 00:02:11
			for you. Number 1 is an action after
		
00:02:11 --> 00:02:14
			negation. For example, let's shut up to I
		
00:02:14 --> 00:02:15
			didn't drink?
		
00:02:16 --> 00:02:16
			I didn't drink
		
00:02:17 --> 00:02:20
			what? Anything That's Sharib Tu Sheyin
		
00:02:20 --> 00:02:22
			So that's Am
		
00:02:23 --> 00:02:24
			If I say In Sharib Tu
		
00:02:25 --> 00:02:27
			if I drink, drink ayeashayin,
		
00:02:28 --> 00:02:29
			anything
		
00:02:29 --> 00:02:32
			as a condition so after a negation
		
00:02:33 --> 00:02:34
			after a condition,
		
00:02:35 --> 00:02:35
			and also
		
00:02:36 --> 00:02:37
			if I use mustard,
		
00:02:38 --> 00:02:40
			should always don't know what is mustard
		
00:02:40 --> 00:02:41
			again,
		
00:02:41 --> 00:02:43
			foundations of every language. That's why I taught
		
00:02:43 --> 00:02:44
			it
		
00:02:44 --> 00:02:46
			to help you navigate these kinds of texts.
		
00:02:48 --> 00:02:50
			My story is used to emphasize something or
		
00:02:50 --> 00:02:51
			to show it's,
		
00:02:52 --> 00:02:53
			it's got brand incidents.
		
00:02:54 --> 00:02:55
			So if I say
		
00:03:00 --> 00:03:02
			I did not eat anything, anything. I did
		
00:03:02 --> 00:03:04
			not drink anything, anything.
		
00:03:04 --> 00:03:05
			So
		
00:03:10 --> 00:03:13
			so 3 scenarios here related to actions with
		
00:03:13 --> 00:03:13
			the
		
00:03:14 --> 00:03:16
			as we say that an action
		
00:03:16 --> 00:03:19
			is like a word with tanwi and a
		
00:03:19 --> 00:03:22
			word with tanwi that comes after negation or
		
00:03:22 --> 00:03:25
			after condition or after negation with mastar is.
		
00:03:26 --> 00:03:28
			So therefore, since words with tanween are like
		
00:03:28 --> 00:03:31
			actions, then we also say actions take the
		
00:03:31 --> 00:03:31
			same rule.
		
00:03:33 --> 00:03:35
			Alas, one fact that we're in the future.
		
00:03:36 --> 00:03:37
			So that's why
		
00:03:39 --> 00:03:40
			we can teach
		
00:04:10 --> 00:04:11
			What does that mean?
		
00:04:11 --> 00:04:15
			Examples of actions that carry a womb are
		
00:04:15 --> 00:04:16
			the following
		
00:04:16 --> 00:04:17
			for example
		
00:04:24 --> 00:04:25
			I did not drink.
		
00:04:25 --> 00:04:26
			If we drink,
		
00:04:27 --> 00:04:29
			and they agree in if
		
00:04:29 --> 00:04:30
			the
		
00:04:35 --> 00:04:36
			and with muster.
		
00:04:36 --> 00:04:37
			So here,
		
00:04:38 --> 00:04:40
			we differ with Imam Al Haramain who says
		
00:04:55 --> 00:04:56
			Not completely.
		
00:04:56 --> 00:04:58
			There are conditions for that.
		
00:04:58 --> 00:04:59
			Rahim O'Houllah.
		
00:05:00 --> 00:05:01
			Because if you say
		
00:05:02 --> 00:05:04
			his argument is if you say, you know,
		
00:05:04 --> 00:05:04
			the Prophet
		
00:05:05 --> 00:05:07
			SAW joined 2 prayers while he was in
		
00:05:07 --> 00:05:11
			travel. In travel here, am means any travel,
		
00:05:11 --> 00:05:13
			far, near, across the street,
		
00:05:13 --> 00:05:16
			but there's an argument for this that can
		
00:05:16 --> 00:05:16
			be made
		
00:05:17 --> 00:05:18
			outside of his,
		
00:05:24 --> 00:05:25
			position.
		
00:05:28 --> 00:05:28
			The Prophet
		
00:05:29 --> 00:05:29
			adjudicated
		
00:05:30 --> 00:05:31
			bet between his neighbors.
		
00:05:32 --> 00:05:34
			In the Qadah of the Messenger of Allah
		
00:05:34 --> 00:05:34
			and his judgments
		
00:05:35 --> 00:05:37
			we don't take a rule.
		
00:05:38 --> 00:05:38
			Although
		
00:05:41 --> 00:05:43
			differ on this and they say, no.
		
00:05:44 --> 00:05:46
			These things are understood to be,
		
00:05:48 --> 00:05:49
			universal
		
00:05:50 --> 00:05:51
			because the Sahaba
		
00:05:52 --> 00:05:52
			were
		
00:05:58 --> 00:06:00
			You know the Sahaba, their language is very
		
00:06:00 --> 00:06:02
			strong so if they use something that means
		
00:06:02 --> 00:06:03
			Aym, that means Aym,
		
00:06:04 --> 00:06:06
			whether it's related to the Prophet's judgments or
		
00:06:06 --> 00:06:09
			someone's describing how he judged between 2 people
		
00:06:09 --> 00:06:12
			or adjudicated between them, SallAllahu Alaihi Wa'arihi Wa
		
00:06:12 --> 00:06:13
			That means
		
00:06:15 --> 00:06:16
			I agree with him actually.
		
00:06:37 --> 00:06:39
			As I just said and said, like, no
		
00:06:39 --> 00:06:40
			way we would think that the Sahab would
		
00:06:40 --> 00:06:41
			use
		
00:06:41 --> 00:06:43
			a form which applies universality
		
00:06:43 --> 00:06:45
			even in the language unless they knew that's
		
00:06:45 --> 00:06:47
			what it meant because they were very careful
		
00:06:47 --> 00:06:49
			in how they narrated on behalf of the
		
00:06:49 --> 00:06:51
			message of Allah SAW Alaihi Wasallam and they
		
00:06:51 --> 00:06:53
			were masters of the language.
		
00:06:55 --> 00:06:56
			That's what Imam al Maribawi,
		
00:06:57 --> 00:06:59
			he said very clearly
		
00:07:04 --> 00:07:07
			knowing that Sahaba say we're prohibited from doing
		
00:07:07 --> 00:07:08
			something like
		
00:07:09 --> 00:07:11
			that means all forms of
		
00:07:11 --> 00:07:13
			because that's the meaning of the statement.
		
00:07:14 --> 00:07:17
			So the slack section imamal haramarin says,
		
00:07:21 --> 00:07:24
			that alone is only taken from what's spoken.
		
00:07:25 --> 00:07:27
			And we said, now there's some differences of
		
00:07:27 --> 00:07:28
			opinion on that. Masha'Allah,
		
00:07:29 --> 00:07:31
			the Madiki is ila ayashay because
		
00:07:43 --> 00:07:43
			That,
		
00:07:44 --> 00:07:45
			an action after negation
		
00:07:46 --> 00:07:47
			means ambiguity.
		
00:07:48 --> 00:07:50
			It's like nakira tanwi
		
00:07:54 --> 00:07:56
			And then they w they mentioned 3 situations.
		
00:08:04 --> 00:08:04
			So
		
00:08:04 --> 00:08:05
			after
		
00:08:07 --> 00:08:08
			condition
		
00:08:08 --> 00:08:10
			or mustar of a fafi'il after nafi'i.
		
00:08:11 --> 00:08:13
			Then we also mentioned Al Qaba'
		
00:08:14 --> 00:08:15
			the judgments of the Messenger of Allah that
		
00:08:15 --> 00:08:16
			people saw
		
00:08:18 --> 00:08:18
			that
		
00:08:20 --> 00:08:21
			those things mean
		
00:08:25 --> 00:08:27
			That's the end of talking about
		
00:08:28 --> 00:08:31
			and Next time, we'll bring some examples of
		
00:08:31 --> 00:08:32
			so you can practice