Suhaib Webb – Reading In Usul al Fiqh Part 5
AI: Summary ©
AI: Transcript ©
So he says here
that,
Sayna Imam Al Qarafi
It's like really nice what he says. He
says,
Muhammad
is is going to be partitioned
with its old foundational issues
and its secondary issues.
And
then its foundational issues are
compartmentalized
into 2 parts.
The first,
Satan.
Saying that and this is the definition of
the and definitions of of those
that say that in the Hanafis also.
These for the most part
are related to language.
So the axiom
that's a principle.
Then he says
and then whatever else is similar to that.
Here it's better if there's no comma.
Because if you think about and
is not
That's why I think I told you guys,
Imam Asubki,
Rahim Ohola.
And I think Imam Ashashi,
yeah, Sheikh Amar mentions this in his
that
these
are
by necessity part of.
But if you think about is not
in the sense of what it is.
Well, definitely
is and is not part of usulofirk,
but it is
the natural outcome of usulofirk.
According to the majority,
like al Baydawi's definition,
Sorry, the minority.
This definition is definition of the minority.
Majority of Sunnis they say
Right? They don't talk about
They don't talk about all that. But they
say that all that is like a natural
outcome of this process.
So that's the first. So that's why he
gives you these examples.
He mentions that, you know, for the most
part,
It has
a infinite number of applications.
One time I asked Sheikh doctor
from
from Libya,
is there a limit to
he said no.
In fact, until the end of times, people
gonna be extracting.
I have a question for you. If if
I were to think about the the the
the Diana of each of these, we said
one is and
and the other one is Adelna, which is
the the
the.
How do they so if if you if
both of them were represented as circles,
Right? Are are they are they are they
you know, they interact? Are they are they
like a Venn diagram?
Or is one sort of encompassing the other?
Because the the has to use the to
generate the.
Right.
He has to so in order for him
to come with the or
he has to say
he has to use all that in order
to
create, if you will, I'm saying it metaphorically,
the ruling. So the relationship is almost like
the ingredients and the chef.
Right? So like the ingredients.
The chef is the
that's
why uh-uh it's said you know Imam Abu
Hanifa used to say
like
you're you're the doctors were the prescribers.
The one who
implements this theory
to answer questions and generate rulings.
The is like the referee.
The is like the player.
Or the is the coach.
Is the player.
Of course, in the time of Madik and
Bukhary, they were both.
But it's not because scholarship is not strong
now.
This is a mistake that the modern Muslim
mind makes which is colonized.
The number of juziyat that Muslims are dealing
with now far outnumber the juziyat that they
had to deal with.
This notion that scholars are no good and
scholars are stupid,
the pace of the world
is so much more faster. And so there
has to be a way as we think
about fiqh in the future
that answers can be generated in a reliable,
trustworthy way. And the mistake of some even
hyper traditionalists
who say there's, you know, no hope for.
We should teach
for. There should be a curriculum, not
of course,
but
Of course,
we we should teach for this. The Shias,
they do a great job of doing this.
We don't.
Right?
And it's sometimes given into this idea of
not appreciating the fact that no, no, we
have grateful kaha now, We
have very knowledgeable,
for example,
very knowledgeable people, right?
But the sheer number of
challenges
far outweighs
because of mass communication itself.
The pressure on the faqih is very different
than say the types of pressure those people
had to face.
This is a mistake people make.
They they came out of,
like really came out of also, they're the
outcome of also.
These mentioned by, you know, many Olama, Imam
Suiti mentions them in Kawakib Basalta.
Imam Suki mentions them in Jamah Joama.
They but the number of
are is unlimited.
Meaning,
it cannot be opposed by other evidences.
So those conditions of the Dalil is how
you answer me said, no, man. You can't
you can't use something that's mansuk
because one of the conditions
of a Dalil is its mustamiran,
not mansuhan.
So So here you see the relationship between.
That's why I say the Mawlana, he says
alleti yata was salubihah.
Almushtihi
So we see now the role of these
is
to allow us to achieve
the correct ruling.
Unfortunately, many Muslims perhaps like that young woman
that or that older woman or that man
that may ask that question,
they're completely
unaware of this important relationship.
We're not talking about now and
like this, like this, like this, they all
go to the same dad.
That's good. Is is it possible for us
in in a further session to to to
ask you questions about the material in this,
history section?
We can.
We can. Yeah. Because I'm going I ran
through most of it. Maybe a few more
pages, but at some point, maybe I don't
know. Do do you have any questions about
this stuff?
It's all about my knowledge and
He says like a lot of interesting stuff
about them, a lot of people don't pay
attention to.
And even he gets like way into like
later, something he did good he goes like
into the later years.
Allah
Which word?
From time to time, this like this.
Sometimes
From
a time period. So
some some time period
every
sometime
your other times it corrected him.
Why is he saying the same? Because,
You have to
understand this and study this well.
The fruit of this book is good, man.
And he doesn't
waste a lot of time
in philosophical
stuff that people
are not able to understand easily.
He takes you to the guts of functional.
Then I have the rojo can master and
he can master of the and also
because I have a class I have to
go to now.