Shadee Elmasry – Why Israel Could Start More Wars Soon

John Mearsheimer on the state of Israel, and he says that he really

doesn't know where this is going, because they're in such a mess

right now that the only solution for him, he sees for for them,

it's something that obviously he's not endorsing, but he's saying the

only solution they have is to expand this war into a regional

war where there is war in Iran, maybe Lebanon, maybe Syria. Who

knows? But the wider it is, it gives basically distracts the

world from what they really, truly want to do, which is ethnically

cleanse the Palestinians. Why is that? Because the only way in this

modern world that we have here where the world is not accepting

an apartheid and they have a country that's an apartheid

country. If they were, it's apartheid state. If they were to

give all the Palestinians their rights, within a few years, you're

gonna, it's gonna be a Palestinian state, because the Palestinians

are a bigger population. They're almost like 5050, but their rate

of birth is higher, so within one generation, it's gonna be

Palestine Israel will be in run by but you'll have an Arab president

in Israel, a Palestinian Muslim president, if they were to do

that. So they can't do that. So right now they have to run it as

an apartheid state, which is that a minority is ruling the majority

and not given the majority, those rights cannot be equal. So the

Palestinians now divided into three, the Israeli Arabs, those

Palestinians who do have who live in Israel, then you have those who

live in the West Bank and those who live in Gaza by isolating

those two groups and not giving them rights. The Arab Israeli in

the middle is a minority. He's saying that they had either

continue the apartheid path and earn the wrath of the modern

world, which is not accepting this. You know, these Israelis,

they're living like Eastern Europeans living in the 1930s and

40s, but they're living in modern times.

They want a colonial state where they could basically do anything

to the natives, which is what the European they're like five

generations behind. They want to do what the what they saw the

Europeans doing in colonial times,

30s, 40s, 50s. They want to do that now.

They're behind, not in the times. So the first up option was the

apartheid state this they can't that can't last. The second option

is a two state solution. They should have just taken that right,

but they refused that. They feared that that two state, that second

state, so close to them, is going to cause too many problems. What

happens if it gets strong, right? You can't control you cannot. They

could not allow for two state solution at all. And then every

time those talks came, they make sure to screw them up. The talks

just screw them up. Oh, they were just talks. So that's the second

thing they'll never allow for.

So what's the third one? Find a way to basically highlight and

delete all these Arabs. That's what they want to do. That'll

actually solve their problems completely.

So in their

if they can exp when October 7 happens, that gives them the

pretext to be able to do that. But here's a problem. The whole

world's watching. So the real solution to this is for them to

expand this war now that it's getting to a mess, and everyone's

got cameras and I'm on a hunt

a whole bunch of telegrams where Arab Arab journalists are out

there filming literally everything. I mean, I just opened

one look at this since this morning, 276

videos and messages from one Arab journalist, another Arab

journalist, 175

another one 565,

and check that in a couple weeks. Another 135 since 11:30am

So because of these cell phones, they're like, Hold on, wait. See,

this would have worked in the 50s. It would have worked in the 30s.

In the 40s, in World War Two times you could do this. Ban the

journalist. The whole world won't know what you're doing. No proof.

That's why I'm saying they're they're late, they're what they're

doing, the way they're living, even the way they make fun of

the Arabs and Palestinians. They're living as if they're in

the 30s and 40s.

So the only solution they have is the ethnic cleansing route.

But the only way to do that is by expanding the war, because after

October 7, they were essentially too much, even till now, there's

too much attention on it. Everyone is just focused on Gaza.

What they really need, according to what MEARSHEIMER says, which

makes a lot of sense, is if there is a front in Iran, and there's a

front in Gaza, sorry, in Lebanon, and there's.

Be casualties coming down on Israel. Then everyone's looking at

those things while nobody's looking they can mop up the

Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, and then they come out of

the that war with hardly any Arabs left. So what are they going to

have to do? They're going to have to do what happened to them in

Germany. They're literally going to have to highlight and delete.

That's their solution. They've literally created, I mean, Hitler

called it the final solution. They've literally created their

own version of that. They put themselves in a situation the

world changed and wants diversity or respect to citizen, though the

world's changed, there's

cameras everywhere. You can't get away with stuff. So they literally

have only one solution out of this. No, the only other way out

is to just be an apartheid state and give the world a finger.

That's it. That's what we are, whether we like it or not, which

is what they have been doing. But they know that's not going to

last. The new generation of American politicians, the new

generation is going to be split on Israel, and eventually the US is

not going to be there. Was

going to say something else, but

is not going to be there is not going to be able to last.

As Allah subhanahu wa Ta said, they only rise behabit In this,

this group of people can only rise in the world when they have a rope

from God or a rope from people. The rope from God is you're

righteous and you have a prophet. You're righteous and you have a

prophet who rises, and you rise righteously, like the kingdoms of

David and Solomon and Abu Minas, is when another country props you

up,

another group of people prop you, you have no they. The one thing

that they have never had and will never have is the ability to prop

themselves

up by a man, by manpower and by courage. There are small nations

in the world and and just by the fact that you have no lands,

you're gonna have to steal land.

In order to do it, you have to steal somebody else's land.

Somebody was saying here that the Philistines, the Palestinians, are

the Philistines. And the Philistines, they come up in

biblical history because they're the ones whom the Israelites had

to fight, and so were the Canaanites. They had to expel

them. And so they've been the age old enemies of the Israelites, the

Palestinians, right? They're saying the Philistines in the

process of saying so you're saying that they were there, right? If

being in the land is historically, is what gives you the right to it.

Now, your story doesn't make doesn't add up, because when

Joshua gets there, there are people there. When David fights

Goliath, they were there many years later, centuries later, even

the original they had to fight the Canaanites and the Philistines and

what have you. So they were there, right? So, so your argument falls

on its face. If that's if, historically, you possessed a land

and you lived in it, that gives you the right to it. Now it

collapses when you read your history, because they had to fight

for that land.

Here's the funny thing, anytime that they give you the history of

the Philistines or whatever, they have to actually show that they

originated somewhere else. Well, who cares? They originated

somewhere else. You also originated somewhere else. Abraham

came from Iraq, Sarah came from Syria, and then they settled in

the Holy Land.