Shadee Elmasry – Is Islam Compatible Feminism

Shadee Elmasry
AI: Summary ©
The speaker discusses their position on the issue of feminism and how it is fluid and diverse. They argue that women are not being represented in the media and that women are being ignored in society. The speaker suggests bringing up specific examples to show how women are being ignored and how they can be addressed.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:04 --> 00:00:08

is Islam compatible with feminism? Now, I wrote an essay about this

00:00:08 --> 00:00:12

subject, which is a summary of my position on the matter. And the

00:00:12 --> 00:00:18

reason I wrote that is because my, I still have a am of the same

00:00:18 --> 00:00:24

opinion that matters relating to feminism, the definitions, the

00:00:24 --> 00:00:28

explanations, or what people consider to be feminism is so

00:00:28 --> 00:00:34

diverse, right? It's so fluid. That to make a statement on a

00:00:34 --> 00:00:39

single about a single to make a single statement about feminism

00:00:39 --> 00:00:43

has become literally impossible, right? It's not like communism,

00:00:44 --> 00:00:50

where certain fundamentals are there like their communism is,

00:00:50 --> 00:00:54

there are certain fundamental ideas intrinsic to the word

00:00:54 --> 00:00:57

communism, right, or attributed to the word Commons. Same with

00:00:57 --> 00:00:59

capitalism, we're even though there's more fluidity with

00:00:59 --> 00:01:01

capitalism, right.

00:01:03 --> 00:01:08

Feminism, though, if you define it as equality, equal opportunity, or

00:01:08 --> 00:01:13

equality, and all matters, financial, etc. Okay. Still,

00:01:13 --> 00:01:19

there's so much room for alternate definitions. Right, well, equality

00:01:20 --> 00:01:23

defined by whom, on whose standard? So you can find that on

00:01:23 --> 00:01:28

the subpoena side of blog posts page, that my position is that you

00:01:28 --> 00:01:31

have to talk about issues. You have talked about issues. Now the

00:01:31 --> 00:01:38

biggest issue is this thesis or idea that you find that all men of

00:01:38 --> 00:01:39

the past

00:01:40 --> 00:01:42

were somehow colluding

00:01:43 --> 00:01:47

to conspiring, whether they realize it or not, to put down

00:01:47 --> 00:01:52

women. All right, now, I have a problem with generalizations.

00:01:53 --> 00:01:57

Okay, now, there is a general reality that Sure, there's a lot

00:01:57 --> 00:02:00

of oppression happening in the past, there's no one's gonna doubt

00:02:00 --> 00:02:04

that. But to generalize over a large swath of people, and when it

00:02:04 --> 00:02:09

comes to Islamic scholarship, they often generalize over all scholars

00:02:09 --> 00:02:15

and now all prophets to okay, that they had slants, that they were

00:02:15 --> 00:02:21

oppressive to women. To me, these generalizations are pointless to

00:02:21 --> 00:02:25

discuss. All right, rather bring me a specific case in which a

00:02:25 --> 00:02:31

specific man was oppressive. With evidence that he was oppressive,

00:02:31 --> 00:02:33

then we could say, yeah, there's a problem. We have a problem with

00:02:33 --> 00:02:37

that, right. And I'll be the first one to line up and say, that's a

00:02:37 --> 00:02:41

problem. We can't accept that. It's just no different than

00:02:42 --> 00:02:47

the concept that even in race, it's the same thing. Right? This

00:02:47 --> 00:02:50

no one feels comfortable with this broad generalization about

00:02:50 --> 00:02:55

anyone's race. Right? So how is it any different in gender, so to

00:02:55 --> 00:03:00

bring a specific point, is far more conducive to actually

00:03:00 --> 00:03:05

reaching a benefit, right, and a conclusion in which, that's fair,

00:03:06 --> 00:03:12

then to accept this dialogue? And this type of dialectic, in which

00:03:12 --> 00:03:16

there are all those people and all these people. So again, it's my

00:03:16 --> 00:03:17

position on that is

00:03:19 --> 00:03:21

on the on the blog, on the blog post.

00:03:23 --> 00:03:27

And if it's not there, I'll put it up I'm pretty sure it's there. So

00:03:27 --> 00:03:30

he decided to org slash blog. So if it's

00:03:33 --> 00:03:37

if they're if the question or has any specific way that they've

00:03:37 --> 00:03:42

understood feminism, then then bring it right, bring it so we can

00:03:42 --> 00:03:42

have

00:03:43 --> 00:03:47

one set of terms and ideas to talk about. Alright, let's see what we

00:03:47 --> 00:03:48

got here.

00:03:52 --> 00:03:55

All the all the

Share Page