Shadee Elmasry – Is Islam Compatible Feminism

Shadee Elmasry
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speaker discusses their position on the issue of feminism and how it is fluid and diverse. They argue that women are not being represented in the media and that women are being ignored in society. The speaker suggests bringing up specific examples to show how women are being ignored and how they can be addressed.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:04 --> 00:00:08
			is Islam compatible with feminism?
Now, I wrote an essay about this
		
00:00:08 --> 00:00:12
			subject, which is a summary of my
position on the matter. And the
		
00:00:12 --> 00:00:18
			reason I wrote that is because my,
I still have a am of the same
		
00:00:18 --> 00:00:24
			opinion that matters relating to
feminism, the definitions, the
		
00:00:24 --> 00:00:28
			explanations, or what people
consider to be feminism is so
		
00:00:28 --> 00:00:34
			diverse, right? It's so fluid.
That to make a statement on a
		
00:00:34 --> 00:00:39
			single about a single to make a
single statement about feminism
		
00:00:39 --> 00:00:43
			has become literally impossible,
right? It's not like communism,
		
00:00:44 --> 00:00:50
			where certain fundamentals are
there like their communism is,
		
00:00:50 --> 00:00:54
			there are certain fundamental
ideas intrinsic to the word
		
00:00:54 --> 00:00:57
			communism, right, or attributed to
the word Commons. Same with
		
00:00:57 --> 00:00:59
			capitalism, we're even though
there's more fluidity with
		
00:00:59 --> 00:01:01
			capitalism, right.
		
00:01:03 --> 00:01:08
			Feminism, though, if you define it
as equality, equal opportunity, or
		
00:01:08 --> 00:01:13
			equality, and all matters,
financial, etc. Okay. Still,
		
00:01:13 --> 00:01:19
			there's so much room for alternate
definitions. Right, well, equality
		
00:01:20 --> 00:01:23
			defined by whom, on whose
standard? So you can find that on
		
00:01:23 --> 00:01:28
			the subpoena side of blog posts
page, that my position is that you
		
00:01:28 --> 00:01:31
			have to talk about issues. You
have talked about issues. Now the
		
00:01:31 --> 00:01:38
			biggest issue is this thesis or
idea that you find that all men of
		
00:01:38 --> 00:01:39
			the past
		
00:01:40 --> 00:01:42
			were somehow colluding
		
00:01:43 --> 00:01:47
			to conspiring, whether they
realize it or not, to put down
		
00:01:47 --> 00:01:52
			women. All right, now, I have a
problem with generalizations.
		
00:01:53 --> 00:01:57
			Okay, now, there is a general
reality that Sure, there's a lot
		
00:01:57 --> 00:02:00
			of oppression happening in the
past, there's no one's gonna doubt
		
00:02:00 --> 00:02:04
			that. But to generalize over a
large swath of people, and when it
		
00:02:04 --> 00:02:09
			comes to Islamic scholarship, they
often generalize over all scholars
		
00:02:09 --> 00:02:15
			and now all prophets to okay, that
they had slants, that they were
		
00:02:15 --> 00:02:21
			oppressive to women. To me, these
generalizations are pointless to
		
00:02:21 --> 00:02:25
			discuss. All right, rather bring
me a specific case in which a
		
00:02:25 --> 00:02:31
			specific man was oppressive. With
evidence that he was oppressive,
		
00:02:31 --> 00:02:33
			then we could say, yeah, there's a
problem. We have a problem with
		
00:02:33 --> 00:02:37
			that, right. And I'll be the first
one to line up and say, that's a
		
00:02:37 --> 00:02:41
			problem. We can't accept that.
It's just no different than
		
00:02:42 --> 00:02:47
			the concept that even in race,
it's the same thing. Right? This
		
00:02:47 --> 00:02:50
			no one feels comfortable with this
broad generalization about
		
00:02:50 --> 00:02:55
			anyone's race. Right? So how is it
any different in gender, so to
		
00:02:55 --> 00:03:00
			bring a specific point, is far
more conducive to actually
		
00:03:00 --> 00:03:05
			reaching a benefit, right, and a
conclusion in which, that's fair,
		
00:03:06 --> 00:03:12
			then to accept this dialogue? And
this type of dialectic, in which
		
00:03:12 --> 00:03:16
			there are all those people and all
these people. So again, it's my
		
00:03:16 --> 00:03:17
			position on that is
		
00:03:19 --> 00:03:21
			on the on the blog, on the blog
post.
		
00:03:23 --> 00:03:27
			And if it's not there, I'll put it
up I'm pretty sure it's there. So
		
00:03:27 --> 00:03:30
			he decided to org slash blog. So
if it's
		
00:03:33 --> 00:03:37
			if they're if the question or has
any specific way that they've
		
00:03:37 --> 00:03:42
			understood feminism, then then
bring it right, bring it so we can
		
00:03:42 --> 00:03:42
			have
		
00:03:43 --> 00:03:47
			one set of terms and ideas to talk
about. Alright, let's see what we
		
00:03:47 --> 00:03:48
			got here.
		
00:03:52 --> 00:03:55
			All the all the