Shadee Elmasry – Inheritance Quandaries NBF 347

Shadee Elmasry
AI: Summary ©
The speakers emphasize the importance of creating trust documents in estate distribution, including a trust for property transfer and the flexibility of the trust. They stress the need for legal experts to clarify details and avoid confusion. The speakers also emphasize the importance of planning ahead of time and adjusting estate, as it is important to ensure proper distribution and avoid future legal issues. They discuss regulations, regulations, and regulations, including Sharia law and inheritance for privacy and trust. The legal process of decency and law enforcement is also mentioned, along with the practical method of writing a will and knowing one's assets and plans. The speakers emphasize maintaining trust and good trust in a legal firm called Mo and Hussein Law Group.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:40 --> 00:00:43

City

00:01:01 --> 00:01:05

As Salam aleikum wa rahmatullah wa barakatu. Welcome everybody to

00:01:05 --> 00:01:09

this inside in nothing but facts live stream Smilla Rahmanir Rahim

00:01:10 --> 00:01:14

Al hamdu lillah wa Salatu was Salam ala Rasulillah. The he will

00:01:14 --> 00:01:18

be here. Well Manuela, first thing I want to begin with is yet Judah

00:01:18 --> 00:01:23

met juge. There are a lot of people who, who make conclusions.

00:01:23 --> 00:01:26

And we all know we're talking about Imran Hussain and his little

00:01:27 --> 00:01:28

band of believers.

00:01:33 --> 00:01:35

And I say that it may sound disrespectful because I don't

00:01:35 --> 00:01:40

respect that this this type of stuff that they that they the way

00:01:40 --> 00:01:43

they go about doing things. So I don't respect so if it's like,

00:01:44 --> 00:01:49

sounds disrespectful, it is. Reason being is this, if you are

00:01:49 --> 00:01:54

someone who claims to study and you cannot separate between a fact

00:01:55 --> 00:02:02

and a theory, right? And you don't know the levels in Islam of

00:02:04 --> 00:02:06

what is different upon

00:02:07 --> 00:02:12

and what is not allowed to be different upon. Right then who

00:02:12 --> 00:02:15

taught you? I said one of the first things that you ever study

00:02:15 --> 00:02:19

is what is something that can be different upon? And what is

00:02:19 --> 00:02:20

something that can't be different upon.

00:02:22 --> 00:02:27

Theories about who is Judah juge, how the sun is gonna rise from the

00:02:27 --> 00:02:33

west are worth a hill of beans? I'm telling you, and in terms of I

00:02:33 --> 00:02:35

didn't I don't I've never seen any scholar

00:02:37 --> 00:02:43

get into this with that depth. Nor ever conflate it with a fact to

00:02:43 --> 00:02:47

the point that they will get red in the face and go after you and

00:02:47 --> 00:02:48

get heated

00:02:49 --> 00:02:54

for anyone who with anyone who doesn't agree with it. So, this

00:02:54 --> 00:02:58

group forget the theory. Analyzing the theory is the least important

00:02:58 --> 00:02:59

thing.

00:03:00 --> 00:03:02

But how are you treating the theory if you're treating the

00:03:02 --> 00:03:05

theory as a fact this is why exactly why Sydney office subjects

00:03:05 --> 00:03:08

LLM maarif Utrecht 11 All

00:03:09 --> 00:03:13

true having true knowledge is to know the differences of opinions

00:03:13 --> 00:03:15

between the scholars and it means two things it means number one

00:03:15 --> 00:03:19

what can have an opinion in the first place and what can't

00:03:20 --> 00:03:24

there's no opinion on Qatar yet. There is opinion on London yet

00:03:25 --> 00:03:30

mucha shabby had maybe some of the older might have dealt with that

00:03:30 --> 00:03:34

but the majority should not delve into them one way or the other.

00:03:35 --> 00:03:37

Just leave it as it is resigned to it and move on.

00:03:38 --> 00:03:39

But kata yet,

00:03:41 --> 00:03:44

or the new yet or even this has not even been yet this is more

00:03:44 --> 00:03:49

like I owe him a welcome is something that has proof that is

00:03:49 --> 00:03:50

less than 50%

00:03:54 --> 00:04:01

so you have a cut 100% The money could be very solid 99.9% all the

00:04:01 --> 00:04:06

way down to 50.1%. Right? So that's a big range right there.

00:04:07 --> 00:04:13

A lot of confidence but can't say 100% and very little confidence or

00:04:13 --> 00:04:19

it's possible check is 5050 and really like these numbers these

00:04:19 --> 00:04:21

percentages are just we're just saying these percentages as so we

00:04:21 --> 00:04:25

can understand. But check is one something's pretty much 50 If they

00:04:25 --> 00:04:30

really don't know that which is has less evidence than that is

00:04:30 --> 00:04:34

called a whim. Just a complete imagination. So you're now going

00:04:34 --> 00:04:35

to take Oh ham

00:04:36 --> 00:04:40

or should cook or even Vanya matters and elevate them up to

00:04:40 --> 00:04:41

kata yet

00:04:42 --> 00:04:46

and essentially base your your your your friend group on this

00:04:46 --> 00:04:50

base. Everything upon this the way that we would do if someone went

00:04:50 --> 00:04:56

against a country verse, an explicit verse, that's like I know

00:04:57 --> 00:05:00

that is like the highest level of that

00:05:00 --> 00:05:03

Do you treat a theory? Forget,

00:05:05 --> 00:05:06

you treat a theory, forget a

00:05:08 --> 00:05:13

an actual matava opinion, there are opinions that are weak, but

00:05:13 --> 00:05:17

that are that are not, they could not be maybe it's not the dominant

00:05:17 --> 00:05:21

opinion of a school have a method, but it's more tuber. It's more

00:05:21 --> 00:05:25

tuber, people consider it, it may not be the strongest, but it's

00:05:25 --> 00:05:28

more tuber. Now you can take someone's not even more tuber and

00:05:28 --> 00:05:31

whatever is considered, we have to take into consideration, right?

00:05:34 --> 00:05:37

It's not even more tuber, you can look into elevate this and now

00:05:37 --> 00:05:41

everyone who doesn't believe in this is whatever they whatever,

00:05:41 --> 00:05:45

you know, latest names that they're calling them, these people

00:05:45 --> 00:05:49

as I know to judge, right? And that's why it's Yeah, I guess I

00:05:49 --> 00:05:53

feel bad for them that they have that, that anyone could fall into

00:05:53 --> 00:05:56

ignorance. So I shouldn't be

00:05:58 --> 00:06:00

something that can be walked back from but I highly recommend the

00:06:00 --> 00:06:03

people who are into those ideas and into those

00:06:04 --> 00:06:08

you know, conspiracy theories. This is like the, like a Reddit

00:06:08 --> 00:06:09

version of Islam.

00:06:10 --> 00:06:15

Right? It is this is the this is the Reddit world of a slump your

00:06:15 --> 00:06:19

if you're into that fine be into it, but know where it is. It's in

00:06:19 --> 00:06:23

the level of Oh ahem or vignette or should cook even.

00:06:26 --> 00:06:30

You can't go out treating this like it's actual fact. You can't

00:06:30 --> 00:06:30

do this.

00:06:32 --> 00:06:35

We're setting up today we're gonna have a really good interview and a

00:06:35 --> 00:06:42

discussion on the problems that happen with inheritance. Now, when

00:06:42 --> 00:06:45

we say problems here, what what I mean by that is that what are some

00:06:45 --> 00:06:50

of the issues that the day to day issues that Muslims today have

00:06:50 --> 00:06:53

with inheritance, given that our life has changed? There are

00:06:54 --> 00:06:55

certain

00:06:57 --> 00:07:01

views that are people have they bring to the table when it comes

00:07:01 --> 00:07:05

to inheritance that may be uneconomic. There may be practices

00:07:05 --> 00:07:10

that occur, and there may be actual legitimate desperations

00:07:10 --> 00:07:14

that occur upon the death of somebody that causes a person to

00:07:14 --> 00:07:18

possibly not observe the rules of inheritance properly. And is there

00:07:18 --> 00:07:22

a way around this that is lawful not playing games with the

00:07:22 --> 00:07:25

shooter? Yeah, that's what we're going to be covering today with

00:07:25 --> 00:07:32

Tarik and churros, two solid NJ lawyers that are backstage right

00:07:32 --> 00:07:36

now or prepping the screen for them. In the meantime, we will

00:07:36 --> 00:07:40

read a story of one of the Olia of Allah.

00:07:42 --> 00:07:46

And that is Mohammed bin nanny beta. And we're reading daily now

00:07:46 --> 00:07:48

from the book, meetings with mountains.

00:07:50 --> 00:07:55

Why we read the stories of the odia is something that brings life

00:07:55 --> 00:07:59

to the heart. And what bliss does and this is another thing, by the

00:07:59 --> 00:08:02

way, for these types of people who is actually relates very well to

00:08:02 --> 00:08:08

these types of people who are spending 99% of their time

00:08:09 --> 00:08:15

on the Illuminati, or the jinn or ecotourism. Or the dead jungle, or

00:08:15 --> 00:08:20

who is yet Jujuba juge. And is it because Aryan Jews? And is it the

00:08:20 --> 00:08:23

Turks? Or is it the Chinese or is every decade is somebody

00:08:23 --> 00:08:25

different, whoever's powerful, it's he has Ujima, Judah that

00:08:25 --> 00:08:29

time. Now it's the Khazarian Jews are what happens when they, when

00:08:29 --> 00:08:29

that

00:08:31 --> 00:08:33

comes back down to earth, there's going to be another group,

00:08:33 --> 00:08:34

whatever.

00:08:35 --> 00:08:38

One of the tricks of bliss is to get a person

00:08:39 --> 00:08:43

to project their virtues or to focus Virtue

00:08:44 --> 00:08:48

on something that is outside of day to day life that is almost

00:08:48 --> 00:08:48

imaginary.

00:08:50 --> 00:08:52

Such that now if you look at the Marxist, they're all about this.

00:08:54 --> 00:08:58

The Marxists they care about justice, they care about sharing.

00:08:58 --> 00:09:04

But their concern about sharing is in this large theoretical, that

00:09:04 --> 00:09:07

may or may not even have it any tangible existence.

00:09:08 --> 00:09:13

Right? The prophets call you to bring your focus of virtue back

00:09:13 --> 00:09:15

onto what is right in front of you.

00:09:16 --> 00:09:23

Sharing does not have not through policies and and people that you

00:09:23 --> 00:09:27

can't put your focus on is with the people right in front of you.

00:09:28 --> 00:09:32

Immediate virtue. This is one of the biggest tricks of abuse and is

00:09:32 --> 00:09:38

the difference between a satanic distraction and deflection of

00:09:38 --> 00:09:40

virtue, and the prophetic way.

00:09:41 --> 00:09:44

So at least we'll come and say if you want you want to be good, now

00:09:44 --> 00:09:47

you want to come back into Islam. All right, why don't you get busy

00:09:47 --> 00:09:52

work in Islamic State? And we'll get you now. Putting pouring all

00:09:52 --> 00:09:58

your virtue into something far off theoretical, that has no nothing

00:09:58 --> 00:09:59

that can be touched. Nothing can

00:10:00 --> 00:10:05

MVC nothing that can be effective right now. Meanwhile, he, he does

00:10:05 --> 00:10:08

that so that you can ignore what is right in front of you.

00:10:09 --> 00:10:14

So that you can ignore the people that you have in your own home, in

00:10:14 --> 00:10:19

your own community on your own street. Theoretical virtue is the

00:10:19 --> 00:10:22

trick of Iblees. Good theoretical virtue.

00:10:24 --> 00:10:28

That's the trick of release. And when effort is being poured effort

00:10:28 --> 00:10:33

upon effort and time after time, hour after hour, is being

00:10:34 --> 00:10:39

born or spent is being spent on something that is pure theory. You

00:10:39 --> 00:10:41

made shaytaan happy he took your goodness.

00:10:42 --> 00:10:46

And he made you wasted in imagination. It's out there in

00:10:46 --> 00:10:50

nothing. But what he doesn't want you to do is to forget all that

00:10:50 --> 00:10:52

nonsense. Why don't you look around

00:10:53 --> 00:10:54

in your immediate circle who needs help? I

00:10:56 --> 00:10:58

remember reading in an example where

00:11:00 --> 00:11:06

shaytaan, where a man may Toba and his mother is lives with his mom.

00:11:07 --> 00:11:13

And Iblees the this your trick this guy with this thing, he keeps

00:11:13 --> 00:11:15

praying for his mother spiritual state.

00:11:18 --> 00:11:22

Right. Mother spiritual state. And the Sheikh was like, Hold on

00:11:22 --> 00:11:23

Doesn't your mom?

00:11:24 --> 00:11:29

Isn't she working? Overtime? Right? He keeps praying for his

00:11:29 --> 00:11:31

mom's spiritual state and a spiritual state something you

00:11:31 --> 00:11:32

can't see. Right?

00:11:33 --> 00:11:38

Is your mom work overtime? Yeah, she does. What do you do? Oh, you

00:11:38 --> 00:11:42

know, I go to school and and I study. Okay, but your mom's

00:11:42 --> 00:11:45

working overtime? years. She's a single mom. She's working

00:11:45 --> 00:11:46

overtime.

00:11:47 --> 00:11:49

Why would I worry about her spiritual state and we're in her

00:11:49 --> 00:11:53

physical state. Right and her financial state. He said the right

00:11:53 --> 00:11:57

path is forget all this talk about your mom's spiritual state, and

00:11:57 --> 00:11:59

worry about her financial and physical state. She's exhausted

00:11:59 --> 00:12:04

every single day. And that was like a big shock to the guy. He

00:12:04 --> 00:12:06

was like this the last thing I expected, I thought the sheikh

00:12:06 --> 00:12:10

would be all about the concern for her spiritual state. So we see

00:12:10 --> 00:12:11

here that

00:12:12 --> 00:12:14

there is imaginary virtue

00:12:16 --> 00:12:20

shaytaan has deflected Your goodness. And then there's actual

00:12:21 --> 00:12:24

infocus day to day virtue. Right.

00:12:26 --> 00:12:29

Hey, Omar, why don't you swap the screens? Put me in the middle. So

00:12:29 --> 00:12:32

I could be like, between the two of them? Yeah, there we go.

00:12:35 --> 00:12:37

All right. Today, we're we got

00:12:39 --> 00:12:41

issues need a minute. Okay, no problem.

00:12:42 --> 00:12:47

What do you think about USC is not a common deflection of Iblees.

00:12:47 --> 00:12:51

When someone becomes good, let's deflect His goodness into some

00:12:51 --> 00:12:58

imagined imaginary area that has no impact on real day to day life.

00:12:59 --> 00:13:01

And you debate people, you know, 18 year olds whose debates you on

00:13:01 --> 00:13:05

the Khilafah 18 year olds who debate you are that yeah, George

00:13:05 --> 00:13:09

and George is the Kazarian juice. Okay, what impact does this have

00:13:09 --> 00:13:13

on anyone's day to day life? Right? Like, if you took that

00:13:13 --> 00:13:15

energy and you put it into your home, your whole family be

00:13:15 --> 00:13:19

converts, right? That all into Islam, see how good this could

00:13:19 --> 00:13:23

because but it's bliss. It's one of the tricks of shaytaan to

00:13:23 --> 00:13:24

deflect goodness.

00:13:26 --> 00:13:28

And when you look at the prophets, what do they do? They come and

00:13:28 --> 00:13:30

they're like, oh, that person needs a meal.

00:13:32 --> 00:13:34

That person needs to help crossing the road this person needs help

00:13:34 --> 00:13:38

moving show me one Hadith where the prophets of Allah when he was

00:13:38 --> 00:13:40

setting them gives a whole long lecture

00:13:42 --> 00:13:46

on there's a whole long lecture on the political theory of Islam

00:13:48 --> 00:13:56

Yeah, yeah. So it's like something where if you look at the Naboo it

00:13:56 --> 00:14:01

goes to what is right in front of you and that actually grows

00:14:02 --> 00:14:06

whereas you could talk theory all day long it bliss is happy with

00:14:06 --> 00:14:06

you

00:14:10 --> 00:14:12

So Mama thinks this is true. Right good

00:14:18 --> 00:14:22

all right, let's talk about this Willie while we now several minute

00:14:22 --> 00:14:26

audio. I met this Woody in 1990s. Of course, he's the author writing

00:14:27 --> 00:14:28

saying that he

00:14:29 --> 00:14:32

No, no, not fat rose.

00:14:34 --> 00:14:35

Sharrows

00:14:37 --> 00:14:41

the author's writing this holding assuming seeing the signs of WIDA

00:14:41 --> 00:14:45

in these people, which is okay when you say Heather Lee meaning

00:14:46 --> 00:14:50

according to what I've seen, when Allah knows best, I met this Woody

00:14:50 --> 00:14:54

in the 1990s while visiting the Zoja of Sidi Mohammed bin Habib.

00:14:57 --> 00:14:59

Okay, he was intoxicated in his states, many very strong

00:15:00 --> 00:15:04

spiritual states, and he would occasionally burst out into song

00:15:04 --> 00:15:08

singing from the sheiks poems of love and the spiritual path. And

00:15:08 --> 00:15:12

his States changed like the weather. One evening. He told us

00:15:12 --> 00:15:14

that during the last few minutes of his father's life, his father

00:15:14 --> 00:15:18

sat up and turned to him said, let's remember Allah. Then his

00:15:18 --> 00:15:23

father laid down and died. And then he, after this, he burst out

00:15:23 --> 00:15:27

into tears. I remember one time in London, there was a Bengali

00:15:27 --> 00:15:31

brother who was whose grandmother passed away now he was in college,

00:15:31 --> 00:15:35

regular college kid, and this witnessing the death of his

00:15:35 --> 00:15:39

grandmother was actually a source of Toba for him. Okay. It was

00:15:39 --> 00:15:43

actually a source of Toba because he's sitting there in the hospital

00:15:43 --> 00:15:46

and he's just grandma's sick, that's all it is. And so,

00:15:47 --> 00:15:51

towards the end of her of her period in the hospital, she had

00:15:51 --> 00:15:55

set up, gathered the family around and she continued to c'est la

00:15:55 --> 00:15:57

ilaha illallah on her Misbah, Cassie saying Allah, Allah, Allah,

00:15:57 --> 00:16:00

Allah, Allah, and she got very strong and intense in the

00:16:00 --> 00:16:05

remembrance, then she made a long dua for everybody really long, and

00:16:05 --> 00:16:08

she was frail and sick, long dot for everybody in the family.

00:16:09 --> 00:16:13

Again, look at the people of Allah what they care about, may you

00:16:13 --> 00:16:16

finish school, may you find a good husband, you find a good wife have

00:16:16 --> 00:16:20

a happy marriage. They're worried about the immediate circle. This

00:16:20 --> 00:16:23

is the reality of odia. Right, the immediate

00:16:24 --> 00:16:25

circle,

00:16:26 --> 00:16:27

right.

00:16:28 --> 00:16:31

And of course, we have concern for the moment to offer the OMAS is

00:16:31 --> 00:16:32

something that's Mutlu.

00:16:34 --> 00:16:36

But the immediate concern are these very simple things.

00:16:37 --> 00:16:42

And then everyone left everyone was happy with that dua, and they

00:16:42 --> 00:16:47

felt good that she's strong and looks healthy. And then suddenly,

00:16:47 --> 00:16:50

then she died after that. And he may Towba. From that, like he

00:16:50 --> 00:16:55

changed his life rounds, just because of the witnessing of how a

00:16:55 --> 00:16:58

movement dies. And he said, That's the right path.

00:17:00 --> 00:17:04

So be careful from this satanic trick. That once you want to

00:17:04 --> 00:17:08

become virtuous, you want to do something good, that he then

00:17:09 --> 00:17:14

deflects you off from day to day from actual true day to day

00:17:14 --> 00:17:17

benefit of people into the realm of theory.

00:17:19 --> 00:17:26

Use if even Mohammed bananas about 80 of FeS same. This is now the

00:17:26 --> 00:17:27

brother

00:17:28 --> 00:17:30

or the son of this first men.

00:17:31 --> 00:17:35

The simple man smiled continuously so his his CIFA was it was always

00:17:36 --> 00:17:39

more possessive always smile many years after taking his picture

00:17:39 --> 00:17:42

turned to the Zoja I saw Yusuf and mistook him for his father, he

00:17:42 --> 00:17:45

looked just like his father. With the passing of time their

00:17:45 --> 00:17:49

appearance have become very, very similar. After we spoke for a

00:17:49 --> 00:17:52

while, I realized my mistake and told him the story his father told

00:17:52 --> 00:17:56

me when I finished relating the story he wept just like his father

00:17:56 --> 00:17:56

did.

00:18:01 --> 00:18:07

While visiting a beautiful old madrasa, a school in which Sita

00:18:07 --> 00:18:10

Mohammed bin Habib taught as a young man, I noticed an elderly

00:18:10 --> 00:18:14

man walk in quietly kiss each of the four walls and then leave.

00:18:14 --> 00:18:19

These are the schools that had in Fez, if you go to these murders is

00:18:19 --> 00:18:19

one of the

00:18:21 --> 00:18:26

it's like the city weeps at the, at the emptiness of the schools

00:18:26 --> 00:18:30

now, not only that, I mean, times have changed and people live they

00:18:30 --> 00:18:35

need more modern facilities. But also these places used to be the

00:18:35 --> 00:18:38

places where Fick was taught and Shetty I was taught and everything

00:18:38 --> 00:18:40

was taught, and now they're empty.

00:18:41 --> 00:18:45

With not only just the technological changes, but also

00:18:47 --> 00:18:48

people don't study anymore.

00:18:51 --> 00:18:57

Here's the one is CDs male Filoli infests FES. This is the man who

00:18:57 --> 00:19:02

loves praising the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa salam all day

00:19:02 --> 00:19:05

and every day, I first heard about CDs made from a friend who

00:19:05 --> 00:19:08

recounted a story that during a large gathering,

00:19:09 --> 00:19:14

of what shall be sought strati referred refers to as the tavern

00:19:14 --> 00:19:19

dwellers, she began to wonder where her husband and friends were

00:19:19 --> 00:19:23

quick as a flash and without being asked Sidious made while standing

00:19:23 --> 00:19:27

and lean leading vicar on the other side of the room, turned and

00:19:27 --> 00:19:30

pointed to them. Many tell similar stories about him without doubt he

00:19:30 --> 00:19:33

is a man of Allah constantly rooted in remembrance and presence

00:19:33 --> 00:19:38

and illustrious notable affairs. He lives in a traditional fancy

00:19:38 --> 00:19:38

house.

00:19:39 --> 00:19:42

The traditional fesi house is centered around an open air

00:19:42 --> 00:19:46

courtyard that overlooks the gardens of,

00:19:48 --> 00:19:51

of one of the beautiful, beautiful garden in one of the hotels in the

00:19:51 --> 00:19:55

Old City. He's a tanner by trade, and he is a deputy in the

00:19:55 --> 00:19:59

spiritual path of Imam Muhammad of God, the author of the world

00:19:59 --> 00:19:59

famous

00:20:00 --> 00:20:05

It will Hyatts which is a lengthy praise of the Prophet sallallahu

00:20:05 --> 00:20:10

alayhi wa sallam which can take three hours to recite CD is made

00:20:10 --> 00:20:17

recites it every day. He finishes the entire Zillertal Hyatts. Every

00:20:17 --> 00:20:21

single day. And here's a picture of his gathering here. On a

00:20:21 --> 00:20:25

working trip to fez Sidious made invited us to lunch, and we

00:20:25 --> 00:20:30

arrived with more people than he expected a driver and ministry

00:20:30 --> 00:20:35

officials. Nothing ever fazes him. 10 foot cut off from the desert

00:20:35 --> 00:20:39

had just began reciting the delightful Hyatts so he attended

00:20:39 --> 00:20:43

to everyone's need while leading the recitation. Our government

00:20:43 --> 00:20:47

officials did not expect this but slowly they began to recite along

00:20:48 --> 00:20:51

three hours later, the most sumptuous meal was served for the

00:20:51 --> 00:20:54

rest of the journey, and all the way to the airport or

00:20:54 --> 00:20:58

conservatively suited ministry driver would ecstatically

00:21:00 --> 00:21:04

turn to Allah and da up the top of his voice. So he's basically here.

00:21:05 --> 00:21:08

Even some of these ministers are raised upon this they know about

00:21:08 --> 00:21:08

this.

00:21:10 --> 00:21:12

The next one is the

00:21:13 --> 00:21:18

one of the most visited places in Morocco, which is the grave of

00:21:18 --> 00:21:23

Mali, Abdullah Sonobe nama. Sheesh. Okay, we ready to go. All

00:21:23 --> 00:21:27

right. So we'll stop here with that. And today we want to turn to

00:21:27 --> 00:21:35

a practical issue, which is the question of inheritance, and how

00:21:35 --> 00:21:38

it's to be distributed. And the main focus of today's discussion

00:21:38 --> 00:21:42

is going to be what are the problems that

00:21:44 --> 00:21:48

people come upon in this, so I'm going to be keeping the chat open.

00:21:49 --> 00:21:52

I'm going to keep this chat open so that people can type in their

00:21:52 --> 00:21:57

comments and your questions. So let's hop over and now we have

00:21:57 --> 00:22:03

todich. And churros. Tata controls are two very well known lawyers in

00:22:03 --> 00:22:06

the state of New Jersey, very popular guys. Shiraz has his own

00:22:07 --> 00:22:11

reasons for being popular. And Todd has with us too. So welcome

00:22:11 --> 00:22:15

to the Safina society nothing but facts live stream. How you guys

00:22:15 --> 00:22:19

doing? Hey, finally, how are you? Very good. Very good. Very good.

00:22:19 --> 00:22:24

Let's get this going off the bat. Why don't you begin with start

00:22:24 --> 00:22:27

telling us, you know, tell us something about inheritance that

00:22:27 --> 00:22:32

the Muslims need to benefit from and need to to understand properly

00:22:32 --> 00:22:36

so that they don't fall into some pitfalls. Why don't you go first

00:22:36 --> 00:22:37

Dark?

00:22:38 --> 00:22:39

Sure.

00:22:40 --> 00:22:44

I mean, I'd like to start with the story. Everybody knows, you know,

00:22:44 --> 00:22:49

Howard Hughes. Howard Hughes is the famous aviator. He managed TWA

00:22:49 --> 00:22:55

billionaire. He passed away in 1976, leaving behind billions and

00:22:55 --> 00:23:01

fortune. And his estate is not settled until 2010. When When did

00:23:01 --> 00:23:11

he die? 1976 1976. And it took 24 plus 1034 years, 34 years for the

00:23:11 --> 00:23:14

state to be settled. And the reason why I bring up the story is

00:23:14 --> 00:23:17

because first of all, Howard Hughes is a smart guy, right? He's

00:23:17 --> 00:23:21

a billionaire. He's intelligent. He has a lawyer that is with him

00:23:21 --> 00:23:21

the whole time.

00:23:23 --> 00:23:27

There's a will apparently, and nobody can locate this. Well, and

00:23:27 --> 00:23:30

this is something that I hear a lot commonly people say like, oh,

00:23:30 --> 00:23:34

I'll just hand write a will. And I'll keep it or, you know, I'll

00:23:34 --> 00:23:37

put a wall somewhere and they cannot locate this well, he writes

00:23:37 --> 00:23:41

a letter, they find a letter to a bank, you know, that says please

00:23:41 --> 00:23:45

find enclosed my will, but there's no wheeling closed. So they know

00:23:45 --> 00:23:47

that it will exist somewhere, but nobody can find it. And because

00:23:47 --> 00:23:52

they can't find it. The court just determines, well, then this person

00:23:52 --> 00:23:56

has no well. And so when the person has no will, the court is

00:23:56 --> 00:23:59

going to apply whatever the state law there is. And ultimately, what

00:23:59 --> 00:24:04

ended up happening is that all of his wealth went to as many distant

00:24:04 --> 00:24:07

cousins as they could find. I think there was like 22 or

00:24:07 --> 00:24:09

something, and many of those came forward and everybody, every time

00:24:09 --> 00:24:12

somebody came forward claiming to be a distant cousin or something,

00:24:12 --> 00:24:14

then the court had to litigate that and litigate that, in that

00:24:14 --> 00:24:17

litigation. Some people claim to be that, you know, some ladies

00:24:17 --> 00:24:21

came and said they married, you know, he married them on a boat in

00:24:21 --> 00:24:23

you know, in offshore, so.

00:24:25 --> 00:24:28

So, like this thing litigated, and that's why it took till 2010

00:24:28 --> 00:24:30

Because every single time this thing came home had to be

00:24:30 --> 00:24:33

litigated, and it was just gonna have kids, his wife and kids. He

00:24:33 --> 00:24:35

was married twice, but he was divorced and he died. And he had

00:24:35 --> 00:24:37

kids, no kids,

00:24:38 --> 00:24:43

no kids, no parents to two ex wives. So it just became so the

00:24:43 --> 00:24:47

point of the story is that the person that has no control over

00:24:47 --> 00:24:50

what's happening to his wealth is Howard Hughes. He has absolutely

00:24:50 --> 00:24:55

no control and and this thing could have been easily easily

00:24:56 --> 00:24:58

avoided and it just simple planning and simple structures.

00:24:58 --> 00:24:59

Let me ask you this question.

00:25:00 --> 00:25:04

Nydia after you die. Who is it your even your wealth?

00:25:05 --> 00:25:10

It's not your wealth. I mean, in principle, yeah, I mean, what

00:25:10 --> 00:25:12

you're getting into, by the way, I'm gonna, I'm gonna start with

00:25:12 --> 00:25:15

saying this is a disclaimer that everything we say is not legal

00:25:15 --> 00:25:18

advice. Yeah, general knowledge. If you need to go speak to an

00:25:18 --> 00:25:20

attorney about your specific case.

00:25:21 --> 00:25:26

definitely sounds like a lawyer. Yeah. Yeah, just just to harp on

00:25:26 --> 00:25:30

that point. The biggest issue I think people don't realize is when

00:25:30 --> 00:25:34

you die, there's inheritance rights that people have over their

00:25:34 --> 00:25:37

God given rights, right? Your wife is supposed to get x, your son is

00:25:37 --> 00:25:39

supposed to get x, your daughter is supposed to get x your mother,

00:25:39 --> 00:25:42

if she's alive, your father, if he's alive, they're supposed to

00:25:42 --> 00:25:44

get something that's not your wealth, right? It's I mean, it's

00:25:44 --> 00:25:47

similar to when we talk about like a cat, right? When you talk about

00:25:47 --> 00:25:51

the cat, it's, you're paying this a cat, but that's not your money.

00:25:51 --> 00:25:54

That's like your wealth, right? That's something that's, you know,

00:25:54 --> 00:25:57

supposed to be given to somebody else that's, that's owed to them.

00:25:58 --> 00:26:03

And so I think a lot of Muslims don't realize the importance of

00:26:03 --> 00:26:07

properly planning their state, they end up dying last minute,

00:26:07 --> 00:26:10

right? Or unexpectedly, we don't know when we're gonna die, right?

00:26:10 --> 00:26:13

Unless, unless you're really ill, and you have kind of an idea. You

00:26:13 --> 00:26:16

know, you die in a car accident, you have no idea. Now what happens

00:26:16 --> 00:26:20

now you leave your if your husband, you die, you leave your

00:26:20 --> 00:26:24

wife, and kids, and now they have to figure out the whole mess

00:26:24 --> 00:26:28

because you didn't properly plan everything. And so now you're left

00:26:28 --> 00:26:31

with this messy situation. And now what you're possibly doing is

00:26:31 --> 00:26:33

robbing people of their inheritance rights. And the

00:26:33 --> 00:26:38

biggest thing I say is it's not just me there's plenty of other

00:26:38 --> 00:26:41

Muslim attorneys that have brought this to me and we were talking to

00:26:41 --> 00:26:43

Chef Haroon as well about this when I was with him a few weeks

00:26:43 --> 00:26:49

ago, that a lot of people, a lot of Muslims have purposely don't

00:26:49 --> 00:26:53

want a Sharia compliant estate. Or have Sharia compliant? Well,

00:26:53 --> 00:26:57

Sharia compliant planning. Yep. And the issue is so so let me get

00:26:57 --> 00:27:00

this straight, you want to go to your grave, with the last thing

00:27:00 --> 00:27:05

you did is not follow the Sharia and rob someone of their

00:27:05 --> 00:27:08

inheritance rights that Allah has given them. Like that's what you

00:27:08 --> 00:27:12

want to do before you die. So it's becoming a problem, actually. And

00:27:12 --> 00:27:14

the issue is that people don't really talk about it. I don't

00:27:14 --> 00:27:18

think a lot of people know much about it. Because I think people

00:27:18 --> 00:27:21

go in with the mentality. Oh, I'll you know, I'll take care of it

00:27:21 --> 00:27:22

later when I'm old.

00:27:24 --> 00:27:28

Let me ask you this. Before we get to my first question. When you say

00:27:28 --> 00:27:32

in a state just for clarification, do you mean that a document

00:27:32 --> 00:27:36

stating who your relatives your inheritors are, who your children

00:27:36 --> 00:27:40

are? And what you possess? And who you're who? If your parents are

00:27:40 --> 00:27:44

alive? Who are they identify them, identify your spouse, identify

00:27:44 --> 00:27:47

your children, identify your brothers and sisters in case they

00:27:47 --> 00:27:50

would inherit at some point, identify our grandkids in case

00:27:50 --> 00:27:54

they have. So who are the inheritors? And what property Do I

00:27:54 --> 00:28:00

own? What assets what cash? Where it all is? Is that what you mean?

00:28:00 --> 00:28:04

When you say estate? So, you know, when you're alive, you're a

00:28:04 --> 00:28:07

person, and you have assets when you die, you become an estate,

00:28:07 --> 00:28:11

right? And so now the legal entity that was you that the dead version

00:28:11 --> 00:28:14

of you is now legally called an estate, it has its own tax ID,

00:28:14 --> 00:28:17

it's gonna follow us on taxes, it can sue people, it can be sued.

00:28:17 --> 00:28:21

It's like its own entity. That's the estate, right? So it has all

00:28:21 --> 00:28:26

of these capacities, and it controls the assets of the

00:28:26 --> 00:28:30

decedent. That's, that makes up the estate in the state house.

00:28:30 --> 00:28:34

Yeah, sorry. In the state has to when when someone writes this

00:28:34 --> 00:28:37

document, it has to be notarized, right can just be a written

00:28:37 --> 00:28:42

document typed up anyone could. So yeah, they're live. So in the

00:28:42 --> 00:28:46

state of New Jersey, you have to have two witnesses, the two

00:28:46 --> 00:28:49

witnesses have to be aware that this is a last will and testament

00:28:49 --> 00:28:52

so you know that they can't think that it's something else. So it

00:28:52 --> 00:28:55

has to be the last one testament. And then on top of that is the

00:28:55 --> 00:28:57

witnesses have to sign a second affidavit, which has to be

00:28:57 --> 00:29:00

notarized. All right, Tarik, here's the first question for you.

00:29:00 --> 00:29:05

What is the main harm that people perceive in the city, the

00:29:05 --> 00:29:06

division,

00:29:07 --> 00:29:09

it could be perceived or real,

00:29:10 --> 00:29:15

in specific cases, that they perceive regarding the division of

00:29:15 --> 00:29:17

inheritance according to the Quran.

00:29:19 --> 00:29:23

So in my experience from you know, I've been practicing this space

00:29:23 --> 00:29:29

for 16 years now, what I've seen come up is two main things. The

00:29:29 --> 00:29:34

first one is how assets are held and how much the spouse is

00:29:34 --> 00:29:38

inheriting. Right. So if, if I own a home, normally people own a

00:29:38 --> 00:29:41

home, they have it jointly with their spouse with their wife,

00:29:41 --> 00:29:46

right? And when they pass away, that house just goes to the wife,

00:29:46 --> 00:29:48

right? Sometimes people have other assets also they hold jointly in

00:29:48 --> 00:29:49

the sense

00:29:50 --> 00:29:55

in the Sharia distribution, the spouse is going to get 1/8 or 1/4

00:29:55 --> 00:29:57

or something more like that, right, which is going to be way

00:29:57 --> 00:29:58

less than

00:29:59 --> 00:29:59

you know,

00:30:00 --> 00:30:03

have, you know the house right? Or whatever assets they have. So

00:30:03 --> 00:30:06

that's one distinction, they find, there's a couple other things that

00:30:06 --> 00:30:08

go with the marital law, not just the house itself, there's a couple

00:30:08 --> 00:30:13

other issues that relate because in the state law, in most state

00:30:13 --> 00:30:18

laws, it is most beneficial to transfer almost everything to your

00:30:18 --> 00:30:22

steps from a tax perspective, and from the perspective of interstate

00:30:22 --> 00:30:24

law, and all that kind of stuff. So that's the one problem. The

00:30:24 --> 00:30:28

second problem that I see is, people will have, they have sons

00:30:28 --> 00:30:32

and daughters, right. And then you've got the sons get double the

00:30:32 --> 00:30:33

daughters,

00:30:34 --> 00:30:39

there was one client I spoke to, and, you know, they have a couple

00:30:39 --> 00:30:42

of sons, they have a daughter, and they like, the sons are all well

00:30:42 --> 00:30:45

off, and they're all established, the daughter is the one who's not,

00:30:45 --> 00:30:48

and so she's kind of the one that needs it more, but that we got to

00:30:48 --> 00:30:51

give her, you know, 1x, and they're gonna get to x. So that

00:30:51 --> 00:30:54

was those two issues that I see come up the most. Okay, let's take

00:30:54 --> 00:30:58

this practical situation now, because this is what really is

00:30:58 --> 00:31:00

important, what hadn't how you can benefit everybody else.

00:31:02 --> 00:31:06

woman lives in a house with children, man dies,

00:31:07 --> 00:31:12

she now possesses 1/8 of the house, children now. And maybe his

00:31:12 --> 00:31:15

parents possess the other seven as

00:31:16 --> 00:31:19

well, how she's live on the mercy of her kids and the mercy of her

00:31:19 --> 00:31:25

parents give us what it's, it's a reasonable harm. This isn't some

00:31:25 --> 00:31:27

kind of like buckling against a shoe. Not a harm, I'm not gonna

00:31:27 --> 00:31:31

say the inheritance is not a harm for sure. But she is in a position

00:31:31 --> 00:31:34

that's compromised in the past, she would have like, male

00:31:34 --> 00:31:38

relative, right, that would have taken care of this, we have harmed

00:31:38 --> 00:31:41

ourselves, I should say, put it this way, in living in these

00:31:41 --> 00:31:46

silos. Right? Given that that's the reality. What?

00:31:47 --> 00:31:52

How is it that this woman can now go on living without now she's

00:31:52 --> 00:31:56

just lost her husband, lost the income that he brought in a lot

00:31:56 --> 00:31:59

now as to raise the children by herself. And now she's uncertain

00:31:59 --> 00:32:03

about where she's gonna live? Yeah. So. So we were talking about

00:32:03 --> 00:32:08

this a little bit yesterday. And the biggest issue is, you have to

00:32:08 --> 00:32:11

apply the context, right? If you're living back in a Muslim

00:32:11 --> 00:32:15

society, you know, like you said, her, you know, male relatives

00:32:15 --> 00:32:17

would take care of her, you know, her brother or father, somebody

00:32:17 --> 00:32:20

would take care of her financially, you know, take them,

00:32:20 --> 00:32:22

take her back into the house, you know, help with the kids and

00:32:22 --> 00:32:26

everything. Now, the situation that we live in, so we're living

00:32:26 --> 00:32:31

in a non Muslim country, right? We the cost of living is insanely

00:32:31 --> 00:32:34

high. Think about New Jersey, the cost of owning a house or buying a

00:32:34 --> 00:32:37

house, I mean, how many people own a house outright 100% equity,

00:32:38 --> 00:32:41

right, that's paid off, no mortgage, nothing. And then we're

00:32:41 --> 00:32:42

also dealing with it.

00:32:45 --> 00:32:50

Around, which is so in American law, we have basically a legal

00:32:50 --> 00:32:53

fiction. And this legal fiction exists, where, let's say you have

00:32:53 --> 00:32:58

the husband and wife on the deed of the house, if one spouse dies,

00:32:58 --> 00:33:00

the husband dies, the entire

00:33:02 --> 00:33:05

house now belongs to the wife. Now she's the sole owner, that happens

00:33:05 --> 00:33:10

automatically upon death, Jersey law, or all states, almost all

00:33:10 --> 00:33:14

almost all states. Yeah. So, so this happens automatically. So

00:33:14 --> 00:33:18

again, if you don't have a, if you don't properly plan for this, now,

00:33:18 --> 00:33:21

you could be robbing people of their inheritance, right? Because

00:33:21 --> 00:33:26

she's only supposed to get an eighth or whatever. So the way the

00:33:26 --> 00:33:29

way around it is, so like, there's one model you can do, right? One

00:33:29 --> 00:33:34

model is you have like an LLC, owned the house. And then on that

00:33:34 --> 00:33:39

LLC, the owners of it, or the husband has save 50%, the wife has

00:33:39 --> 00:33:45

50%, when the husband dies, he can allocate it. So she has her 50%

00:33:45 --> 00:33:48

Plus she gets the eighth. And then let's say he has two sons, they

00:33:48 --> 00:33:52

get 25% Each of the remainder, and then they get put on that, you

00:33:52 --> 00:33:56

know, and then they just have, you know, assuming your children, you

00:33:56 --> 00:33:59

know, love their mom and want to allow her to live in the house.

00:33:59 --> 00:34:03

They don't sell it off, and, you know, split the cash, but they let

00:34:03 --> 00:34:06

allow her to live in it, but they have equity so that later down the

00:34:06 --> 00:34:10

road when she passes away, you know, it goes to her children,

00:34:10 --> 00:34:13

which are the same kids. And then if they want, they can decide at

00:34:13 --> 00:34:15

that point, you know, do we want to sell the house or whatever, and

00:34:15 --> 00:34:19

the split amongst us. So that's like one way to do it. You want to

00:34:19 --> 00:34:22

talk about putting in a trust? Yes, talk about the trust

00:34:22 --> 00:34:25

approach. I mean, the trust approach is the best planning

00:34:25 --> 00:34:28

method. You know, from, from my experience, from what I've seen, I

00:34:28 --> 00:34:31

know all the horror stories that we bring up the Howard Hughes

00:34:31 --> 00:34:34

story, other stuff prints, all these other celebrities, anybody

00:34:34 --> 00:34:37

that's had a major issue with their estates being in massive

00:34:37 --> 00:34:39

dispute or these issues, almost all these problems will be solved

00:34:39 --> 00:34:43

with a trust. And the trust is a very simple instrument, right? You

00:34:43 --> 00:34:46

create an entity, which is the trust, and you're the grantor who

00:34:46 --> 00:34:50

puts something into the trust, and it has a beneficiary, right, and

00:34:50 --> 00:34:53

now you can control exactly what happens to this entity after you

00:34:53 --> 00:34:55

die. But you've already put it into trust.

00:34:56 --> 00:34:59

So two issues on the house thing I mean, one of my things that the

00:34:59 --> 00:35:00

majority of people

00:35:00 --> 00:35:04

Living in New Jersey, especially. But in America, in general is

00:35:04 --> 00:35:06

usually like a two income household where the husband and

00:35:06 --> 00:35:09

wife are both contributing to the house to the mortgage, right. So,

00:35:09 --> 00:35:11

you know, naturally, there's going to be something where like,

00:35:11 --> 00:35:15

Alright, we're going to put this house into this trust together.

00:35:15 --> 00:35:17

And when one person dies, the other one's going to live it and

00:35:17 --> 00:35:19

when the second person dies, it goes to the children, that's

00:35:19 --> 00:35:21

normally how a trust would work.

00:35:23 --> 00:35:26

And to me, that will make sense if, you know, if both people are

00:35:26 --> 00:35:28

contributing to the house, not that situation where like the

00:35:28 --> 00:35:33

husband, you know, is the sole provider. And you know, he has the

00:35:33 --> 00:35:37

trust could help in that scenario, too. Because a husband could say

00:35:37 --> 00:35:42

that, okay, this, this house is in trust, and it ensures that, you

00:35:42 --> 00:35:44

know, his wife or his widow can stay in the house for her life.

00:35:45 --> 00:35:47

And then after she dies, then you can control where it goes after

00:35:47 --> 00:35:51

that. So then it doesn't fall into inheritance situation, that

00:35:51 --> 00:35:54

doesn't make sense. So there's the thing about the trust that is very

00:35:54 --> 00:35:56

flexible, you can do almost anything that you want it to do,

00:35:56 --> 00:35:59

which is the key here, the key is controlled, because we are Muslims

00:35:59 --> 00:36:03

living in a country that doesn't have the laws or our inheritance

00:36:03 --> 00:36:05

laws, but But it gives us this ability to control but we have to

00:36:05 --> 00:36:09

kind of write this out and, and take that control. So a trust is

00:36:09 --> 00:36:14

something that is not private property anymore. It's in it was

00:36:14 --> 00:36:20

an endowment that is now managed by the by somebody, initially, the

00:36:20 --> 00:36:24

person who puts it into a trust, and therefore the rules of the

00:36:24 --> 00:36:31

city of inheritance laws would not apply to a trust, because it's a

00:36:31 --> 00:36:32

trust is

00:36:33 --> 00:36:38

it's not private property. So now what happens if the if now let's

00:36:38 --> 00:36:43

say the dad has this trust, and the terms are, we live in it

00:36:43 --> 00:36:47

together, if I die, you live in it to the wife, and you're the

00:36:47 --> 00:36:50

manager of the trust, and you have the right to live in it. If you

00:36:50 --> 00:36:57

die first, then I just revoke the trust. The trust is no longer

00:36:57 --> 00:36:59

trusting returns back to my private property. And then when I

00:36:59 --> 00:37:03

die, it inherits to the kids by the rules of the city. Or

00:37:04 --> 00:37:11

she she takes it. Now she's the manager of the trust. And she does

00:37:11 --> 00:37:13

a trust now when when she dies.

00:37:15 --> 00:37:18

It dissolves the trust dissolves into whoever she says Correct?

00:37:19 --> 00:37:21

I'll make one more distinction just so you're clear. There's two

00:37:21 --> 00:37:24

types of trusts, right? There's what you call the revocable trust

00:37:24 --> 00:37:27

a revocable trusts, as you create it, you put stuff in it, you can

00:37:27 --> 00:37:30

amend it, you can revoke it, you can do whatever you want to it.

00:37:30 --> 00:37:33

And this is treated as like your alternate, right, it's treated as

00:37:33 --> 00:37:36

like you but like an alternate form. So it has, you know, its ID

00:37:36 --> 00:37:39

is your social security number and all that stuff. The second type of

00:37:39 --> 00:37:42

trust is called an irrevocable trust. So if you put an asset in

00:37:42 --> 00:37:46

an irrevocable trust it asset is not yours. So the state of

00:37:46 --> 00:37:48

maturity, like the under state law, it's not considered your

00:37:48 --> 00:37:51

assets. Right. So if I bought a house and and they want to do it

00:37:51 --> 00:37:54

as a search on me, they won't find the house because it's not mine.

00:37:54 --> 00:37:57

Right. And so for the Iroquois trust, you cannot amend it, you

00:37:57 --> 00:37:59

cannot change it, you cannot revoke it, it's just kind of

00:37:59 --> 00:38:01

exist. And so

00:38:02 --> 00:38:06

the and it has own tax ID so you will have its own separate tax ID

00:38:06 --> 00:38:09

and files own separate taxes, it will be a separate. So when when

00:38:09 --> 00:38:12

you create a broken trust during your lifetime, you can amend it or

00:38:12 --> 00:38:15

change it. Once you die. That trust converts automatically to

00:38:15 --> 00:38:18

irrevocable and then a successor you so you would appoint a

00:38:18 --> 00:38:21

successor trustee to come in this person, you know, you name like

00:38:21 --> 00:38:24

one or two alternates, they come in and they take over the trust as

00:38:24 --> 00:38:27

a trustee in roles. They can't change it. They can't make any

00:38:27 --> 00:38:30

changes. All they can do is carry out what the Trust says that's

00:38:30 --> 00:38:32

what would happen. Does the trust have to have a board?

00:38:33 --> 00:38:36

A board? It's not a board, it's just a trustee. You can one person

00:38:36 --> 00:38:40

you got to appoint multiple trustees, like a co trustees that

00:38:40 --> 00:38:42

act together. Not

00:38:43 --> 00:38:46

that that ends up slowing things down and creating more conflict.

00:38:46 --> 00:38:48

But But yeah, you could appoint multiple trusts. Okay, let's say

00:38:48 --> 00:38:52

hypothetically, you're in a situation, do both parents use the

00:38:52 --> 00:38:57

house, die one at a time, mother's the wife was taken care of she

00:38:57 --> 00:39:01

never had to feel that she's under the mercy of her kids to buy or

00:39:01 --> 00:39:04

sell the house and she's not a co owner of the house. It's a trust.

00:39:04 --> 00:39:09

She's the trustee she lives in it. Now she passes away and names her

00:39:09 --> 00:39:11

children as the trustees afterwards, are they allowed to

00:39:11 --> 00:39:13

sell the house and pocket that cash?

00:39:14 --> 00:39:17

If they're the trustees and the beneficiaries, right, so the

00:39:17 --> 00:39:20

trustee has the trustee is the only one that has the authority to

00:39:20 --> 00:39:23

do anything with the assets, the trustee can add assets to the

00:39:23 --> 00:39:26

trust or sell assets from the trust. But what happens to the

00:39:26 --> 00:39:30

cash is determined by who's the beneficiary if the children are

00:39:30 --> 00:39:33

the beneficiaries, then they can take that okay, so they would be

00:39:33 --> 00:39:39

then listed as beneficiaries and trustees. Now I can understand the

00:39:39 --> 00:39:43

for the wife, she's in a hostage and this trust element making the

00:39:43 --> 00:39:44

house so

00:39:45 --> 00:39:48

it removes her from that hostage if the husband dies, and she

00:39:48 --> 00:39:50

doesn't have the income to support this house.

00:39:52 --> 00:39:54

But once it passes from the wife to the kids now

00:39:57 --> 00:39:59

that need is not there. So

00:40:00 --> 00:40:03

Have you talked to any shield that said that, you know, when does

00:40:03 --> 00:40:07

this end as a trust and returned back to now being dissolved a

00:40:07 --> 00:40:09

court and but in accordance to the shutdown?

00:40:13 --> 00:40:16

I haven't. I haven't talked. I think there's one other issue that

00:40:16 --> 00:40:20

comes up first. Yeah. Maybe you can answer. And this we're talking

00:40:20 --> 00:40:25

about this is. So, you know, the trust can have a trigger event,

00:40:25 --> 00:40:28

right, the trigger event would be the death of the first person, but

00:40:28 --> 00:40:32

the first spouse, so say the husband dies. The question is,

00:40:33 --> 00:40:36

for example, if you have a revocable trust, because

00:40:36 --> 00:40:39

essentially, you can take it back, right, you can take whatever out

00:40:39 --> 00:40:42

of the trust, you can amend the trust, you can do whatever, you,

00:40:42 --> 00:40:46

you own it, you're in control of it right now. That's from like the

00:40:46 --> 00:40:49

American law perspective. In a revocable trust, you give it away,

00:40:49 --> 00:40:52

like, here's an example I can make an irrevocable trust, I have a

00:40:52 --> 00:40:55

rental property, I put in an irrevocable trusts, I can't ever

00:40:55 --> 00:40:58

change it, the beneficiary are my kids, they get paid out from it.

00:40:58 --> 00:41:01

That's something I gifted during my life, right. But it's not

00:41:01 --> 00:41:05

triggered by my death. Or I can or I can do something where I create

00:41:05 --> 00:41:08

a revocable trust, that rental property is going to go to my

00:41:08 --> 00:41:13

kids, when they turn age 3035, it'll be set by an age, then the

00:41:13 --> 00:41:15

property transfers to them, and they can do whatever they want

00:41:15 --> 00:41:18

with it. Very good reference here. Now, when we have a revocable

00:41:18 --> 00:41:21

trust against little tricky, right, from a video perspective,

00:41:21 --> 00:41:26

because now if the revocable trust is triggered by my death, right,

00:41:26 --> 00:41:31

and then say, you know, if I have a wife, it goes to my wife is the

00:41:31 --> 00:41:35

trustee and a beneficiary to be able to live in that house. Right?

00:41:36 --> 00:41:41

Because it's transfers, at the moment of death. Right? Or at the

00:41:41 --> 00:41:44

moment of death. It's like, that's the trigger of it. I don't know if

00:41:44 --> 00:41:49

that creates a shittier. Issue. Number one, yeah, that's something

00:41:49 --> 00:41:52

I haven't discussed in depth with shoot,

00:41:53 --> 00:41:55

shoot. And so that's something that needs to be looked into.

00:41:56 --> 00:42:02

Then, yeah, the second point would be that now if the wife is a co

00:42:02 --> 00:42:06

trustee, or if she's, you know, it's a joint trust, and the wife,

00:42:07 --> 00:42:10

the husband died, now the wife passes away, and it goes to the

00:42:10 --> 00:42:11

children.

00:42:12 --> 00:42:16

Whether or not that creates a an issue, which should be good, but

00:42:16 --> 00:42:19

it but it's kind of linked to the first part, right? Because if the

00:42:19 --> 00:42:19

husband dies,

00:42:20 --> 00:42:23

there's an issue of inheritance right there. Right, if it's a

00:42:23 --> 00:42:27

revocable trust? So that's something I don't mean, you were

00:42:27 --> 00:42:30

talking about it yesterday a little bit was how do you deal

00:42:30 --> 00:42:32

with that? I don't know if you if you heard back from anybody. No, I

00:42:32 --> 00:42:37

haven't heard back in terms of if the death if we establish my death

00:42:37 --> 00:42:40

as a trigger to shift my property into a walk.

00:42:43 --> 00:42:46

But one thing we do know is that the magic effect does allow for

00:42:46 --> 00:42:48

the temporary work.

00:42:49 --> 00:42:52

So the idea of a temporary work fizzle out, which is why the

00:42:52 --> 00:42:56

rental property used as a masjid has the rules of msgid

00:42:58 --> 00:43:02

rules a method applied because it is a temporarily a walk. So

00:43:02 --> 00:43:06

somebody could say, Hey, everybody, my house right here is

00:43:06 --> 00:43:10

a masjid for the next 10 years. After 10 years, it comes back into

00:43:10 --> 00:43:10

my

00:43:12 --> 00:43:15

possession. So that's, that's one thing we do know, that's where the

00:43:15 --> 00:43:20

concept of a revocable trust does have precedent in the show. Okay,

00:43:20 --> 00:43:24

now, let me ask you this, how many people have actually used this

00:43:24 --> 00:43:25

technique?

00:43:27 --> 00:43:32

You know, to to manage their home further in case that the man

00:43:32 --> 00:43:35

passes away so that the wife could have a place to live without any

00:43:35 --> 00:43:35

hostage?

00:43:38 --> 00:43:40

How many people that have that we've dealt with? Yeah, like, do

00:43:40 --> 00:43:43

you see this in practice? Or is it still in theory? No, I don't this

00:43:43 --> 00:43:48

is. So the ones that I've done, this is the way that people have

00:43:48 --> 00:43:52

implemented it. So the first spouse dies, the second spouse,

00:43:52 --> 00:43:56

you know, takes control of it. When the second one dies, then

00:43:56 --> 00:43:58

what they do with the trust normally is they just then

00:43:58 --> 00:44:01

everything gets liquidated, and then distributed amongst heirs.

00:44:03 --> 00:44:05

So that's, that's the preferred way of doing it for most people.

00:44:05 --> 00:44:10

Sorry, can you repeat that again? So the way that we've set it up

00:44:10 --> 00:44:13

that people have wanted to be set up is that the first spouse dies,

00:44:13 --> 00:44:16

then the second spouse takes the house and just lives in it right.

00:44:16 --> 00:44:19

And because the trustee remains the trustee, when the second

00:44:19 --> 00:44:23

spouse dies, then everything gets liquidated, sold or whatever, and

00:44:23 --> 00:44:26

then distributed amongst the children. I see. Okay. Yeah. Okay.

00:44:26 --> 00:44:30

That's been the preferred method. In what percentages? Shadow

00:44:30 --> 00:44:33

percentages? Yeah. Well,

00:44:34 --> 00:44:36

you know, obviously we've done that for other people that but

00:44:36 --> 00:44:41

yes, percentages. Okay. Let's talk about now. A lot of people feel

00:44:41 --> 00:44:45

that their their sons are going to survive. I'm worried about my

00:44:45 --> 00:44:48

daughter. I don't want her to receive a small inheritance and my

00:44:48 --> 00:44:53

son's receive a high inheritance. Talk to us about that. So I mean,

00:44:53 --> 00:44:56

I was just dealing with a client just recently and that was her

00:44:56 --> 00:44:59

main concern. I have songs in there already established them a

00:44:59 --> 00:44:59

lot. Bye

00:45:00 --> 00:45:02

I have a daughter, and she's the one that needs it, she hasn't held

00:45:02 --> 00:45:05

the steady job, she's the one that's not married, she needs

00:45:05 --> 00:45:09

more. And so, and the advice is kind of the same thing, right?

00:45:09 --> 00:45:13

It's the idea of, you can give a gift in your lifetime. Yeah, and

00:45:13 --> 00:45:17

there's no restriction on that. But once but you cannot do

00:45:17 --> 00:45:20

something to circumvent the distribution of after you die. So

00:45:20 --> 00:45:22

I advised him the same thing, I said, Look, you can make an

00:45:22 --> 00:45:26

irrevocable trust, right. So this is completely out of your assets,

00:45:26 --> 00:45:29

you make an irrevocable trust, you make your daughter, the

00:45:29 --> 00:45:32

beneficiary, you know, you be the trustee, or somebody appoints

00:45:32 --> 00:45:35

someone as a trustee of it, and let her benefit from that. And

00:45:35 --> 00:45:36

then

00:45:37 --> 00:45:41

and then you can give in your, in your, after your death, you can

00:45:41 --> 00:45:44

still make it, you know, 1x 2x, two, your sons and your daughter,

00:45:44 --> 00:45:46

but she's already gotten this other interview was gift already.

00:45:46 --> 00:45:49

So she has something else ahead of time. And then she gets that at

00:45:49 --> 00:45:53

the end, all right, to give a gift to your son to your daughters, but

00:45:53 --> 00:45:59

not your son also has some shitty question marks to write because

00:45:59 --> 00:46:01

you have to be equitable. So

00:46:02 --> 00:46:05

in that case, are you saying that you do it with the permission of

00:46:05 --> 00:46:07

the sons, that the sons are okay with this?

00:46:09 --> 00:46:12

I mean, my advice is, you know, just from a practical point of

00:46:12 --> 00:46:13

view, you should probably do it with that otherwise is going to

00:46:13 --> 00:46:17

create a lot of bad blood, and it's going to create more problems

00:46:17 --> 00:46:21

in the estate management later on. So that would be just from a

00:46:21 --> 00:46:23

practical point of view. But from a theory point of view, I think it

00:46:23 --> 00:46:26

would make sense to Yeah, from a strategic point of view, there

00:46:26 --> 00:46:32

needs to be equity in the gift giving. Right? Unless someone four

00:46:32 --> 00:46:35

goes, right, yeah, unless the the one says, Yeah, I understand the

00:46:35 --> 00:46:41

situation I forego. I don't need it. Right, I forego it. Okay. And

00:46:41 --> 00:46:45

I wonder even if that has discussion, or regard on it,

00:46:45 --> 00:46:47

because there could be how did you there how to just like, I'm

00:46:47 --> 00:46:51

embarrassed to say no to my dad, right? Or I can't really say no to

00:46:51 --> 00:46:52

my dad.

00:46:53 --> 00:46:56

Yeah, I mean, look, in the state law, you can have like the you can

00:46:56 --> 00:47:00

point whatever point your shares your point, the your heirs who are

00:47:00 --> 00:47:02

going to inherit later on after your death, they can disclaim

00:47:02 --> 00:47:05

their share, they can say, Look, this is what I'm inheriting. But I

00:47:05 --> 00:47:08

don't want it I put it back in the pot, and you're gonna have it.

00:47:08 --> 00:47:10

That's that right. But the problem is that that disclaimer cannot

00:47:10 --> 00:47:15

happen legally. Until that moment. Someone can say verbally. Oh,

00:47:15 --> 00:47:17

yeah, I'll make sure we take care of our sister or something like

00:47:17 --> 00:47:19

that. Yeah, that's not that means nothing. It means nothing. Yeah.

00:47:20 --> 00:47:23

Later on. Yeah. Okay, talk to us more about some of the wisdoms

00:47:23 --> 00:47:26

you've developed over the years that can benefit people regarding

00:47:26 --> 00:47:26

inheritance.

00:47:28 --> 00:47:30

So the biggest benefit, the biggest wisdom that I can say is

00:47:30 --> 00:47:33

planning, planning, planning, planning, and then there's

00:47:33 --> 00:47:36

planning of all sorts. So first, we talked about making sure that

00:47:37 --> 00:47:41

you can plan in such a way that you can ensure that your estate is

00:47:41 --> 00:47:45

taken out is distributed through Sharia means, right. So whatever

00:47:45 --> 00:47:48

that language is, we can put that into a trust document orrible

00:47:48 --> 00:47:51

document and ensure it like so I've been doing things like

00:47:51 --> 00:47:54

alright, this is going to be your Sharia distribution, right? This

00:47:54 --> 00:47:57

will be your Sharia distribution. Well, what happens if, by the time

00:47:57 --> 00:47:59

you die, this changes, right. And that changes what the distribution

00:47:59 --> 00:48:02

will be. So I mean, the method that I was using was, I would

00:48:02 --> 00:48:07

literally put in a chapter from a book of tech like glass of the

00:48:07 --> 00:48:10

traveler as an exhibit to the world, so that they trust so that

00:48:10 --> 00:48:12

the executor or the trustee can look at it be like, alright, well,

00:48:12 --> 00:48:15

this situation change, but let me find my situation in this chapter

00:48:15 --> 00:48:18

and then determine it. And this would be completely legal, because

00:48:19 --> 00:48:22

the court, the law is that they will, the courts will try to see

00:48:22 --> 00:48:26

get to the intent of the testator, whatever they. And if you can make

00:48:26 --> 00:48:30

that intent as fair as possible, as unambiguous as possible, then

00:48:30 --> 00:48:33

it's very, you know, it's going to happen according to what you said,

00:48:33 --> 00:48:39

right? So having trusts in place is is going to, so you can have a

00:48:39 --> 00:48:42

will in place, and it can do that. The will is a document that we're

00:48:42 --> 00:48:45

going to, we're going to draft it up, we're going to sign it, and

00:48:45 --> 00:48:46

we're going to put it away, and we're not going to look at it

00:48:46 --> 00:48:50

again, until somebody dies, right? And then when you die, then this

00:48:50 --> 00:48:52

document gets unsealed and brought out and then we got to go to court

00:48:52 --> 00:48:54

and do all this stuff. And the court has to look at it, they have

00:48:54 --> 00:48:58

to prove it isn't that. But a trust is a document that once you

00:48:58 --> 00:49:00

create, it creates an instrument that's alive and living at this

00:49:00 --> 00:49:03

exact moment, right. And so what you're doing is you're you create

00:49:03 --> 00:49:06

the trust, and you put everything into it. It's a living document.

00:49:06 --> 00:49:09

So therefore nobody come back later on to say, like a will can

00:49:09 --> 00:49:12

be disputed. You can say, Look, this person when they drafted this

00:49:12 --> 00:49:15

will didn't have mental capacity. Right? When they died, they told

00:49:15 --> 00:49:18

me XYZ Oh, there's another will, and that they drafted this other

00:49:18 --> 00:49:20

will after this one and all this stuff. So there's a lot of ways

00:49:20 --> 00:49:22

that you can dispute it. And even though those disputes are

00:49:22 --> 00:49:25

defeated, they will ultimately cause a lot of

00:49:26 --> 00:49:31

delay in this process. Yeah, you'll see this come up a lot with

00:49:31 --> 00:49:35

disputed wills specifically. So you'll have somebody maybe was a

00:49:35 --> 00:49:39

caretaker for somebody older, and they kind of like forged or will

00:49:39 --> 00:49:42

they just make a fake will and then you know, forged that

00:49:42 --> 00:49:45

person's signature that somebody else comes in says no, I found

00:49:45 --> 00:49:48

this document. This was this person's will. Now you're battling

00:49:48 --> 00:49:52

in court for like six years, seven years. By the time the assets even

00:49:52 --> 00:49:55

get distributed and the people that were supposed to benefit

00:49:55 --> 00:49:59

can't benefit. So you really want to take care of this during life

00:49:59 --> 00:49:59

while you have your

00:50:00 --> 00:50:04

for mental capacity, and you can plan it like way ahead of time.

00:50:04 --> 00:50:07

And then you can always adjust your estate plan later on, when

00:50:07 --> 00:50:09

you're older, you might change it after you have some more grandkids

00:50:09 --> 00:50:13

or whatever, but you want to take care of it as early as possible.

00:50:15 --> 00:50:18

I think that's really important. Good. Tell me about 401 K's that

00:50:18 --> 00:50:19

sometimes

00:50:20 --> 00:50:24

stipulate that immediately it's going to go to the wife.

00:50:26 --> 00:50:30

And it's not going to be divided up in inheritance, which could be

00:50:30 --> 00:50:35

an issue, sometimes the wife is, it could be like a third wife or

00:50:35 --> 00:50:40

fifth wife, that a guy has any as other kids, she's not going to

00:50:40 --> 00:50:43

care as much just hypothetical question. They're like,

00:50:44 --> 00:50:48

what happens for most of them in that regard. So 401k is, is you

00:50:48 --> 00:50:50

just need, you can name the beneficiary on any kind of

00:50:50 --> 00:50:53

retirement plan. So most people will just stay in their spouse,

00:50:53 --> 00:50:57

but you can also spell out who should inherit from it. But it

00:50:57 --> 00:50:59

gets more and more complicated, the more and more complicated your

00:50:59 --> 00:51:02

thing is. So what you can do very simply, is just make the

00:51:02 --> 00:51:05

beneficiary of your 401k your trust,

00:51:06 --> 00:51:08

I see. Okay, so the money just goes into the trust, and it gets

00:51:08 --> 00:51:11

distributed through there. And then everything is taken care of.

00:51:11 --> 00:51:14

And the thing is that what we do is when we do a trust, we also do

00:51:14 --> 00:51:17

what they call a pour over will. So in the Will It doesn't say

00:51:17 --> 00:51:21

anything, except that everything not in your trust will pour over

00:51:21 --> 00:51:25

into the trust, right. So the will references the trust. And that's

00:51:25 --> 00:51:27

why it becomes very impossible just because you executed this

00:51:27 --> 00:51:30

trust in the will the same time, the will references this specific

00:51:30 --> 00:51:33

trust. And so it becomes very impossible for somebody to come

00:51:33 --> 00:51:36

later on and say, Oh, they didn't have capacity when they did this

00:51:36 --> 00:51:38

or didn't mean to do this. Because this is a living instrument you've

00:51:38 --> 00:51:40

been you had it when you've been managing it this your whole life.

00:51:41 --> 00:51:44

And the wills are referencing it. So it becomes impossible to do and

00:51:44 --> 00:51:47

then everything goes to the trust. And in the trust. We put we spell

00:51:47 --> 00:51:49

out all of the Sharia distributions in there. Don't you

00:51:49 --> 00:51:52

have to give away a certain percentage of a trust every year?

00:51:54 --> 00:51:57

That's for private foundations for foundation that's a private

00:51:57 --> 00:52:01

foundation, that whose purpose is charitable, right? And because

00:52:01 --> 00:52:05

because they're taking a charitable deduction, there's a

00:52:06 --> 00:52:09

requirement that they have to distribute 5% or 10% every year.

00:52:09 --> 00:52:14

Okay, this is just a question. Let's go to the questions from

00:52:14 --> 00:52:15

from our audience here.

00:52:16 --> 00:52:19

What age would you recommend someone start a will.

00:52:23 --> 00:52:26

So my recommendation is that every one should have a will,

00:52:27 --> 00:52:32

as early as they have anything, any kind of assets, right? But you

00:52:32 --> 00:52:36

want to make sure you have the will and in place, if you have

00:52:36 --> 00:52:39

significant assets. And by significant I don't mean like a

00:52:39 --> 00:52:42

million dollars, but you have something more you want to you

00:52:42 --> 00:52:44

want to put a trust together and start putting assets in the trust.

00:52:45 --> 00:52:47

Particularly if you have property, you have different books, and you

00:52:47 --> 00:52:49

have all these different things, right, because each asset, imagine

00:52:49 --> 00:52:52

each asset is like a brick, right. And you're carrying all these

00:52:52 --> 00:52:55

bricks, your whole life individually. When you die, all

00:52:55 --> 00:52:57

the you you're dead, and all these bricks are just kind of laid

00:52:57 --> 00:53:00

around, and then they're frozen, nobody can touch them, we got to

00:53:00 --> 00:53:03

go to court. And we got to do this. And we got to do that before

00:53:03 --> 00:53:05

we can even get to these things. But a trust is like a bucket,

00:53:05 --> 00:53:07

right. And we're just putting all the bricks into this bucket and

00:53:07 --> 00:53:09

you're carrying this bucket. And then when you die, you just hand

00:53:09 --> 00:53:12

the bucket off to someone else to start distributing immediately. So

00:53:12 --> 00:53:15

this instrument is good is when you know, once you start having

00:53:15 --> 00:53:18

assets of any kind, you should start setting up a trust in a will

00:53:18 --> 00:53:21

package and have it going because once you set up this trust, we

00:53:22 --> 00:53:24

usually extracted in a way that you don't have to keep changing it

00:53:24 --> 00:53:27

or revoking or amending it, you can just go on with this trust,

00:53:27 --> 00:53:30

because the way we did it is very flexible. And then you can just

00:53:30 --> 00:53:34

kind of go on with this, when somebody gets a lawyer for this

00:53:34 --> 00:53:35

too, there has to be in the same state.

00:53:37 --> 00:53:41

You want to make sure that the trusts and wills are are executed

00:53:41 --> 00:53:45

in accordance with the laws of the state that you live in. So a

00:53:45 --> 00:53:47

lawyer from your state is gonna know that if a lawyer from

00:53:47 --> 00:53:49

sometimes lawyers practice, I've done that I've done stuff from New

00:53:49 --> 00:53:54

York, New Jersey, Florida as well. So I know, I'm familiar with those

00:53:54 --> 00:53:57

in those states and can do it, but you should go with the lawyers in

00:53:57 --> 00:54:00

your state. Okay. That's where it's gonna end up. So if there's a

00:54:00 --> 00:54:03

dispute is gonna end up in court. So those dates, okay. All right.

00:54:03 --> 00:54:06

Next question states.

00:54:07 --> 00:54:10

Would it not be feasible to legally have the house in the name

00:54:10 --> 00:54:14

of the mother, but Islamically, it is known that the respective

00:54:14 --> 00:54:17

allocations are correctly allocated. So this question is

00:54:17 --> 00:54:21

basically asking, Can we have a concept that something is legally

00:54:21 --> 00:54:28

in the name of, of somebody with the civil government, but we as a

00:54:28 --> 00:54:31

family know that it's going to be distributed in this manner? I

00:54:31 --> 00:54:33

mean, that's sort of like a shitty question. And it's a legal

00:54:33 --> 00:54:39

question, right? I mean, I mean, you can, like, for example,

00:54:39 --> 00:54:41

somebody was sick and they know the husband's sick, he knows he's

00:54:41 --> 00:54:44

about to pass away. I mean, he could just, he could just do a

00:54:44 --> 00:54:49

quick claim deed and transfer the property to his wife. Right. Now.

00:54:49 --> 00:54:51

She's 100% owner, he gifted it during life. But again, that's a

00:54:52 --> 00:54:54

video question. I don't know in this video. He's not allowed to do

00:54:54 --> 00:54:59

that. It wouldn't be valid to affect to alter inheritance on the

00:55:00 --> 00:55:00

death. But

00:55:01 --> 00:55:05

yeah, and anything like within one year he dies from that, or he dies

00:55:05 --> 00:55:09

from that sickness. I think the different methods may define the

00:55:09 --> 00:55:11

deathbed illness differently. But

00:55:13 --> 00:55:17

anything that would alter the inheritance done intentionally,

00:55:17 --> 00:55:19

that on the deathbed would not be valid. But

00:55:21 --> 00:55:22

I think by Shetty,

00:55:23 --> 00:55:27

we don't separate between these documents unless the State forces

00:55:27 --> 00:55:31

you to write. So let's say person is unaware that the state has its

00:55:31 --> 00:55:35

own law. And then the state then says, no, no, no, this whole house

00:55:35 --> 00:55:37

is going to so and so.

00:55:38 --> 00:55:41

Then in that case, we would say no, okay, that you got stuck with

00:55:41 --> 00:55:44

that. Now you have to distribute it properly. It's on you to

00:55:44 --> 00:55:48

distribute it, but we can't possibly write a civil document.

00:55:49 --> 00:55:53

Stating one thing, while intending another thing, it doesn't work

00:55:53 --> 00:55:56

when you write a civil document. That's what the document is.

00:55:56 --> 00:56:00

That's what the ownership is. So that's the answer to Nexus

00:56:00 --> 00:56:05

fulcrums. Question. That sounds like a neat startup. Oh, got you

00:56:05 --> 00:56:06

got a question?

00:56:12 --> 00:56:12

Yep.

00:56:15 --> 00:56:16

Yep.

00:56:23 --> 00:56:26

Okay, come sit here. So you can talk. So So did you guys hear that

00:56:26 --> 00:56:29

question? He says, Now let's talk about let's talk about owning a

00:56:29 --> 00:56:34

business. Sure. I'm a partner in the business 50%. And churros has

00:56:34 --> 00:56:36

50%, then

00:56:38 --> 00:56:43

I die? Does my 50% How does it get treated? Yeah, so this is this is

00:56:43 --> 00:56:45

something you have to plan as well, this is part of this is kind

00:56:45 --> 00:56:47

of essentially part of your estate planning. So when you set up a

00:56:47 --> 00:56:50

business, let's say you set up an LLC, right, you'll have an

00:56:50 --> 00:56:53

operating agreement that lays out what happens in the event that one

00:56:53 --> 00:56:58

of the owners dies, right? So say, say I pass away, me and your

00:56:58 --> 00:57:01

business partners, my 50%, there's a couple of different things you

00:57:01 --> 00:57:04

can do. Right? So one could be, let's say, my, my family is going

00:57:04 --> 00:57:09

to inherit my 50% share, we could have a clause in there that says,

00:57:09 --> 00:57:12

hey, look, okay, these are not sophisticated people in this

00:57:12 --> 00:57:16

business in this industry, so they're not going to actually help

00:57:16 --> 00:57:19

out with this thing. Right. So we're going to do is, you know,

00:57:19 --> 00:57:22

Dr. Shetty will continue running the business. And they will only

00:57:22 --> 00:57:25

collect, they only have an economic interest in the business.

00:57:25 --> 00:57:28

So when one makes a profit, they get 50% of it. And then it's up to

00:57:28 --> 00:57:31

them to split it amongst, you know, amongst their family, but

00:57:31 --> 00:57:34

you continue to make all the business decisions, that's one

00:57:34 --> 00:57:39

thing. Another option is you can have where in the event that, you

00:57:39 --> 00:57:43

know, in the event that I die, that you have the option to buy my

00:57:43 --> 00:57:47

equity at fair market value, right. And then when you buy me

00:57:47 --> 00:57:52

out that, you know that that money goes to my family, yeah. So that's

00:57:52 --> 00:57:55

another way to deal with it. And then the other option would be

00:57:55 --> 00:58:01

that you name a successor. So let's say I have a son, he's

00:58:01 --> 00:58:03

primed and ready to go to help you, you know, he's been learning

00:58:03 --> 00:58:06

this business, he's gonna take my place, so I can name him

00:58:06 --> 00:58:11

specifically. And then he takes over that 50%. So there's a couple

00:58:11 --> 00:58:14

of different ways that very good, so they they have the Huck, it's

00:58:14 --> 00:58:20

inherited like anything else. Except that they they may not it

00:58:20 --> 00:58:23

may be written in a clause that they'd have no managerial rights.

00:58:25 --> 00:58:29

And that if they and that there's an option for you to for my

00:58:29 --> 00:58:34

partner to buy them all out. Good. Next question. You may own the

00:58:34 --> 00:58:37

structure but not the land that it sits on.

00:58:41 --> 00:58:43

Okay, I think they're, they're having another just descend on the

00:58:43 --> 00:58:45

discussion. Here's another question from all Mayer Malik.

00:58:46 --> 00:58:49

Does the trust have to follow the Islamic inheritance distribution?

00:58:49 --> 00:58:51

This is what we talked about earlier.

00:58:52 --> 00:58:54

Does a trust have to follow inheritance laws?

00:58:57 --> 00:59:02

The trust is a trust is not a private property anymore. It's a

00:59:02 --> 00:59:02

walk

00:59:03 --> 00:59:06

from, from a legal perspective, from a state law perspective, a

00:59:06 --> 00:59:11

trust is an instrument that's that you create that will do whatever

00:59:11 --> 00:59:14

you want, so it doesn't have to follow any particular laws. Right.

00:59:14 --> 00:59:18

So famous example, Leona Helmsley, the real estate magnate in New

00:59:18 --> 00:59:22

York City, who part of her state was the Empire State Building. She

00:59:22 --> 00:59:24

left $12 million to her dog.

00:59:26 --> 00:59:31

Remember that? Yeah, remember? She's insane. Yeah. So you know,

00:59:31 --> 00:59:34

you can do that you can create a trust and leave it to all kinds of

00:59:34 --> 00:59:37

stuff, right. So and that's something that people can also do

00:59:37 --> 00:59:41

right. So how we draft the trust is whatever you want. So we can

00:59:41 --> 00:59:43

draft it from a point of view from a Sharia point of view, say like,

00:59:43 --> 00:59:47

okay, look, I want to have a 1/3 of my Hosea you know, going to

00:59:47 --> 00:59:48

some charitable

00:59:49 --> 00:59:52

organization organizations right, and then the remainder, which is

00:59:52 --> 00:59:54

the inheritance will go according to the Sharia distributions. We

00:59:54 --> 00:59:57

will have to spell that out in the trust and they will follow that

00:59:57 --> 01:00:00

but the trust itself, how it gets distributed is complete.

01:00:00 --> 01:00:02

We up to you, which is to our advantage because now we can

01:00:02 --> 01:00:05

manipulate it, you have to think about this. First of all, it has

01:00:05 --> 01:00:09

to be made to trust while you're still alive. Number two, a walk,

01:00:09 --> 01:00:10

let's say a masjid,

01:00:11 --> 01:00:14

that Masjid no one assumes that it's that when we dissolve it,

01:00:14 --> 01:00:18

that it's going to follow the inheritance laws and be dissolved

01:00:18 --> 01:00:22

to the inheritors of the board. Alright, no one assumes that it's

01:00:22 --> 01:00:25

not a company, it's not private property. That's the key. It's a

01:00:25 --> 01:00:31

wealth. Now, to use the wealth, how you use it, if you're, if it's

01:00:31 --> 01:00:35

a healer, and you're just trying to circumvent the rules of the

01:00:35 --> 01:00:38

shitty out without a need to do so.

01:00:39 --> 01:00:44

Okay, when I say need to do so there can be a legitimate

01:00:44 --> 01:00:49

situation where you want to ensure someone's livelihood, for example.

01:00:49 --> 01:00:52

And of course, everything's insured only by Allah. But

01:00:52 --> 01:00:55

speaking in worldly terms, but I think that you have to now just

01:00:55 --> 01:01:00

look at if that has just gone. Are we just playing games that goes

01:01:00 --> 01:01:01

back to the person's intention?

01:01:02 --> 01:01:04

That's fair to say, right.

01:01:05 --> 01:01:08

All right. Next question. Could you also split the theoretical

01:01:08 --> 01:01:13

value of the house appropriately. And if an agreement comes between

01:01:13 --> 01:01:17

all the inheritors, then they all input the percentage of

01:01:17 --> 01:01:20

inheritance received on the payments.

01:01:21 --> 01:01:25

So I think he's saying that, let's say you have a regular

01:01:25 --> 01:01:30

inheritance, Mom inherits 1/8. All of us inherit seven eighths, but

01:01:30 --> 01:01:32

Mom inherits a whole bunch has a whole bunch of cash that she could

01:01:33 --> 01:01:35

buy us out basically, from our percentage. Of course, they could

01:01:35 --> 01:01:39

do that. If I understood him correctly, right? Yeah. Yep. Not

01:01:39 --> 01:01:40

sure if you guys

01:01:41 --> 01:01:47

are trusts the comfortable. What is the status of Zika with trusts?

01:01:49 --> 01:01:54

To try trust, trust a worker does not pays a cut. It's not a

01:01:55 --> 01:01:57

it's not a person's wealth.

01:01:58 --> 01:02:02

Right? I think that this would be a distinction between a revocable

01:02:02 --> 01:02:06

and irrevocable because in a revocable trust, you can still

01:02:06 --> 01:02:08

benefit from it, you can amend it, you can change it, you can put all

01:02:08 --> 01:02:11

your assets in there. So it could become if you didn't pay as a cat

01:02:11 --> 01:02:15

on that you could use it as a means to bypass a cat. Right. But

01:02:15 --> 01:02:18

it revocable it's out of you're completely out of your control,

01:02:18 --> 01:02:21

right? It's not your asset, it's not considered your asset. You

01:02:21 --> 01:02:22

don't have control over it.

01:02:24 --> 01:02:28

You know, there, I can see it. But you know, that's why it really

01:02:28 --> 01:02:32

calls for you to go back to the intent. Because you can easily see

01:02:32 --> 01:02:37

the intent, the misuse of a trust, right, you can easily see that.

01:02:37 --> 01:02:41

And you can easily see it as a solution to a contemporary problem

01:02:41 --> 01:02:44

that we currently have. Right? So that's where it really has to go

01:02:44 --> 01:02:45

back to that intention.

01:02:46 --> 01:02:49

Is there a way to stipulate that the trust will be distributed

01:02:49 --> 01:02:54

according to certain FIP? Well, he said already that the trust can be

01:02:54 --> 01:02:56

dissolved, however, the person puts it in.

01:02:59 --> 01:03:02

very clear, very unambiguous, so we can't just say, distributed

01:03:02 --> 01:03:06

according to Maliki back, because, you know, your successor trustee

01:03:06 --> 01:03:08

has got to figure that out. And if they can't figure that out, and

01:03:08 --> 01:03:10

then people are gonna start disputing Well, according to my

01:03:10 --> 01:03:13

inelegant check, is this in accordance with minus this and

01:03:13 --> 01:03:16

this minor minority opinion there? So you have to be very

01:03:16 --> 01:03:20

unambiguous. So I literally state the things that if there's

01:03:20 --> 01:03:24

something you can attach as an exhibit, like chapter one, we can

01:03:24 --> 01:03:28

do that. Very good. Very good. All right. Aslan. Ogden. Malik says

01:03:28 --> 01:03:31

it's 218 in Malaysia. What time is it in Jersey? I think we're

01:03:31 --> 01:03:37

exactly like 13 hour difference, right? 12 hour difference. Okay. I

01:03:37 --> 01:03:40

was shot Shah says pleasure meeting you guys. You guys met

01:03:40 --> 01:03:43

yesterday at the Muslim Bar Association in New York.

01:03:46 --> 01:03:50

Joy asks the questions is important topic. Thank you so much

01:03:50 --> 01:03:53

for Zack Lohana forgive it needed attention. Can the brothers

01:03:53 --> 01:03:57

advising today kindly post their contact information? Is that for

01:03:57 --> 01:04:00

law or for other purposes, because we know SROs are single.

01:04:01 --> 01:04:05

Jersey knows that right? Okay, so send us an email in Faustina

01:04:05 --> 01:04:11

cited.com.org For that purpose for your purpose legal your your

01:04:11 --> 01:04:14

company what's it called? Your firm? Our firm is Emma then

01:04:14 --> 01:04:20

Hussein Law Group. And the website is safflower s ath la w.com All

01:04:20 --> 01:04:23

right, you shouldn't What am I not make Assef law you'll get a lot

01:04:23 --> 01:04:23

more

01:04:24 --> 01:04:28

job before. The only reason we did that was because Amazon hoosain

01:04:28 --> 01:04:31

are so common and there's so many law firms with Amazon Santa Ana we

01:04:31 --> 01:04:33

couldn't get the domain name otherwise so it's what is the

01:04:33 --> 01:04:38

What's your my initials and th which are his initials, law. That

01:04:38 --> 01:04:42

was a unique name we could get out short. Good, good, good. Jovita

01:04:42 --> 01:04:49

human rights does a child have when he sees his parents openly

01:04:49 --> 01:04:54

biased in wealth towards other siblings and excluding one child?

01:04:57 --> 01:05:00

That's not him. That's oppression and he could make

01:05:00 --> 01:05:03

We don't know if he can complain to anybody. But that wouldn't be

01:05:03 --> 01:05:07

right. I don't know what what rights he has. And in American

01:05:07 --> 01:05:08

law, he has no rights, right?

01:05:09 --> 01:05:14

You can just you can, anyone you want. Good, you can disinherit.

01:05:14 --> 01:05:17

And in life, you can give to one and ignore the other as much as

01:05:17 --> 01:05:20

you want. Let's talk about before I get to this question.

01:05:22 --> 01:05:25

Can someone refuse inheritance?

01:05:27 --> 01:05:30

I mean, you could just give the money away, right? Yeah, you're

01:05:30 --> 01:05:33

gonna know you just don't cash the check, because that's what you

01:05:33 --> 01:05:35

could do in state law, you can disclaim it, you would have to do

01:05:35 --> 01:05:38

that. And that normally happens for tax purposes, like somebody

01:05:38 --> 01:05:41

doesn't want it because this is going to put them above the money

01:05:41 --> 01:05:44

is going to put them above a tax situation they don't want to be in

01:05:44 --> 01:05:46

so they'd rather not have the money or the assets, right?

01:05:46 --> 01:05:49

Especially if it's if it's an illiquid asset that doesn't have

01:05:49 --> 01:05:52

cash, and it carries a lot of tax burdens with it. So they may just

01:05:52 --> 01:05:55

say, I don't even want it. So they can disclaim it at that point. And

01:05:55 --> 01:05:58

then what happens to it by law, then it goes back to states with

01:05:58 --> 01:06:01

the state, the state can keep it or the state can try to sell it,

01:06:01 --> 01:06:03

or the state can also display it and just say, Look, we don't want

01:06:03 --> 01:06:07

anyone who manages the estate, the lawyer, the guys lawyer, the

01:06:07 --> 01:06:10

trustee, so the person will name so if it's a trust, it'll be a

01:06:10 --> 01:06:13

trustee, it is just a well, it will be an executor. And that

01:06:13 --> 01:06:16

person is appointed by you appointed, and that person could

01:06:16 --> 01:06:21

be like a family friend, could be a son who's old enough. It could

01:06:21 --> 01:06:23

be your wife, it could be anybody. Usually it's somebody in your

01:06:23 --> 01:06:28

family, then they will hire attorneys to go out and help them

01:06:28 --> 01:06:34

with it. Yeah, good. Ubiquitous says in Hanafy, FIP. A child

01:06:34 --> 01:06:39

cannot forego a gift in terms of when the parent is giving out

01:06:39 --> 01:06:43

gifts, everybody, the parent cannot question the child say,

01:06:43 --> 01:06:49

Hey, you mind if I just give your sister this nice? endowment? This

01:06:49 --> 01:06:52

nice walk, and you don't take anything? Because you're well off?

01:06:53 --> 01:06:56

You're putting a child in an impossible situation. If he says,

01:06:56 --> 01:07:01

No, he looks selfish. If he says yes, then we may think that he's

01:07:01 --> 01:07:04

just embarrassed in front of his debt. Right? So there's how to So

01:07:04 --> 01:07:07

he's saying that he must take it, the parent must give it to him,

01:07:08 --> 01:07:10

and then he could give it away once it's in his possession if he

01:07:10 --> 01:07:12

wants to. Okay, good question.

01:07:13 --> 01:07:16

Good response, are you because hey, Omar, had you heard this

01:07:16 --> 01:07:19

before? And Hanafuda? This is what this is what it

01:07:20 --> 01:07:22

sounds right to me, because there's a lot of knowledge there.

01:07:23 --> 01:07:28

Okay, good speaking the mic. Open this gentleman's microphone. My

01:07:28 --> 01:07:32

question is, is that with small personal items, like your phone,

01:07:32 --> 01:07:37

your clothing, and even like, pieces of paper plants you own?

01:07:37 --> 01:07:41

How does that get distributed? By should you buy? Should you sell it

01:07:41 --> 01:07:45

or just like everything is distributed? I think that the I

01:07:45 --> 01:07:47

don't want to say it's specific, but

01:07:48 --> 01:07:54

those personal effects, they are inheritable things. So everyone

01:07:54 --> 01:07:57

has a portion to it. And I guess once it reaches that granular

01:07:57 --> 01:07:58

level, like

01:07:59 --> 01:08:02

these mundane things that don't have much value, except for

01:08:02 --> 01:08:05

sentimental value, then I think that they just agree to distribute

01:08:05 --> 01:08:09

it how they wish, if there has no value to it. Intrinsically, it's

01:08:09 --> 01:08:12

just sentimental value, then I'm assuming that I have to double

01:08:12 --> 01:08:17

check that in terms of FIP. Yeah, what's the law on that? When we do

01:08:17 --> 01:08:21

like, so when I draft a will, what I'll do is I'll a person can

01:08:21 --> 01:08:25

maintain a list of items that have sentimental value, like a photo

01:08:25 --> 01:08:28

album, or something like that. They don't really have any type of

01:08:28 --> 01:08:31

monetary value. And they can just say, you know, this, this person

01:08:31 --> 01:08:33

should get this, but they can just maintain that list. And that will

01:08:33 --> 01:08:36

be incorporated by reference. As far as personal facts that have

01:08:36 --> 01:08:39

monetary value, normally just do an estate sale and liquidate it.

01:08:39 --> 01:08:42

So if you've seen this around, you've seen estate sale. That's

01:08:42 --> 01:08:45

all it is just you know, all the little things you put up for sale,

01:08:45 --> 01:08:47

you liquidate it, you take the cash and you distribute amongst

01:08:47 --> 01:08:51

the heirs. Very good, very good. And Sherry, can you appoint a

01:08:51 --> 01:08:55

trust caretaker for someone that is unable to make decisions due to

01:08:55 --> 01:08:56

special needs?

01:08:57 --> 01:08:59

And to ensure they're not taking care of

01:09:01 --> 01:09:05

think that's for sure any, it's going to be the dad first, then

01:09:05 --> 01:09:09

the mom then you know, the next of kin after that.

01:09:10 --> 01:09:14

It also raises an issue because part of the planning is also this

01:09:14 --> 01:09:18

part, right? Because you could be you anybody any of us could have

01:09:18 --> 01:09:20

have an issue where at some point, we don't have capacity, but we're

01:09:20 --> 01:09:23

not dead yet. So now the world itself doesn't apply. That stuff

01:09:23 --> 01:09:26

doesn't apply. So you have to appoint someone to make decisions

01:09:26 --> 01:09:30

for you and to carry out tasks while you're incapacitated. So

01:09:30 --> 01:09:31

there's a different instrument for that one, right? It'll be a

01:09:31 --> 01:09:34

durable power of attorney. So that's something that we also give

01:09:34 --> 01:09:36

to people to make sure they can execute that. And then there's

01:09:36 --> 01:09:39

another one that deals with your healthcare decisions like who's

01:09:39 --> 01:09:42

making healthcare decisions, why you cannot and so there's a health

01:09:42 --> 01:09:46

care proxy which also appoints someone to do that. So I can I can

01:09:47 --> 01:09:52

appoint my my my doctor's son to be my health care power of

01:09:52 --> 01:09:57

attorney and my accountant daughter to be my finances Power

01:09:57 --> 01:09:59

of Attorney. What is the durable power?

01:10:00 --> 01:10:03

Joining. Yeah, so power attorney, you give power attorney someone to

01:10:03 --> 01:10:06

sign on your behalf a durable power. So that power of attorney

01:10:06 --> 01:10:09

would be ineffective. If you were incapacitated, a durable power of

01:10:09 --> 01:10:13

attorney would be still effective even after you have some kind of

01:10:13 --> 01:10:16

incapacity, right. So for example, it's like let's say I can make it

01:10:16 --> 01:10:18

to a closing, I need someone to sign for me, I can just give them

01:10:18 --> 01:10:20

a power of attorney. So they can go to that particular closing and

01:10:20 --> 01:10:23

silence. So it's a very limited power of attorney is just for this

01:10:23 --> 01:10:26

one purpose, right? A durable power of attorney is like, look,

01:10:26 --> 01:10:29

you can you can manage all of these non medical affairs. As many

01:10:29 --> 01:10:32

you can, you can you can list out all of them. They're all non

01:10:32 --> 01:10:34

medical, and you give it to somebody and it's durable in the

01:10:34 --> 01:10:37

sense that if I become incapacitated, you still have this

01:10:37 --> 01:10:41

power of attorney. So whether I'm awake or in a coma. Great. That's

01:10:41 --> 01:10:45

durable. And and then there's the limited one. So you have power of

01:10:45 --> 01:10:49

attorney for this deal only. Yeah, right. And up to this amount of

01:10:49 --> 01:10:52

money only. Right. And then there's the health care power of

01:10:52 --> 01:10:56

attorney, which is just for health. That's right health care.

01:10:56 --> 01:10:59

And that only kicks in when you are incapacitated, so that when

01:11:00 --> 01:11:03

you cannot make a medical decision. And you know what we

01:11:03 --> 01:11:05

know what kind of treatment you're getting. Now there's the ultimate

01:11:05 --> 01:11:09

medical decision, which is the pulling the plug decision? Yeah.

01:11:09 --> 01:11:12

That's the decision, you yourself would make it that document. So

01:11:12 --> 01:11:14

nobody, you wouldn't appoint anyone for that you would make

01:11:14 --> 01:11:17

that decision yourself in that Doc. But I can imagine that

01:11:17 --> 01:11:21

there's a there could be a person who's old enough, that requires

01:11:21 --> 01:11:24

somebody to make medical decisions for them while they're still.

01:11:25 --> 01:11:29

They're still alive and aware. But they're just

01:11:31 --> 01:11:35

not aware enough, or don't care enough. So we I mean, I don't know

01:11:35 --> 01:11:38

if I don't Yeah, well don't care enough? I don't know. But if

01:11:38 --> 01:11:40

they're not aware enough, because they will still say that they lack

01:11:40 --> 01:11:45

capacity. Okay, from a legal point of view. So, so but is there a

01:11:45 --> 01:11:49

spectrum, like, someone may be able to hold a conversation,

01:11:50 --> 01:11:53

but not sit with a doctor and understand what's being said for a

01:11:53 --> 01:11:56

while? How do How did how do people determine that that's gonna

01:11:56 --> 01:12:01

have to go to a judge? Yep. If somebody is over 18, and they are,

01:12:01 --> 01:12:04

they can pass as like, you know, they go to it in front of a judge

01:12:04 --> 01:12:08

and pass as like, they're the, you know, they can be I mean, they're

01:12:08 --> 01:12:09

out there. You know,

01:12:10 --> 01:12:13

I've dealt with this to this issue of like,

01:12:15 --> 01:12:18

you know, what, if someone needs to be in an institution,

01:12:19 --> 01:12:22

involuntarily, that's gonna be a decision a judge is gonna have to

01:12:22 --> 01:12:24

make can this person does this person pass as they know what

01:12:24 --> 01:12:24

they're doing?

01:12:26 --> 01:12:29

I'm sort of kind of sort of being facetious, but I'm actually

01:12:29 --> 01:12:32

thinking this might actually happen someday. What if a guy says

01:12:32 --> 01:12:32

I want

01:12:34 --> 01:12:37

the remaining shares, remainder share two thirds to go to my son,

01:12:38 --> 01:12:44

two thirds to go to all my sons, and one shares for each of my son

01:12:44 --> 01:12:48

and one share for any my daughter's right. And then a

01:12:48 --> 01:12:51

daughter comes before the court and says, identify as a guy.

01:12:55 --> 01:12:59

Well, well, you can name specifically by name, you know,

01:13:01 --> 01:13:02

initially, at least initially, and

01:13:05 --> 01:13:09

you can't leave it vague sons and daughters. I mean, that would be

01:13:09 --> 01:13:13

left vague. One share to my daughter to all daughters, two

01:13:13 --> 01:13:17

shares to all sons, what if you like to think that will come up in

01:13:17 --> 01:13:19

a situation where you had asked a bunch? So you execute a Will you

01:13:19 --> 01:13:21

say, Look, this is what is going to be for the people who are alive

01:13:21 --> 01:13:25

and any after born kids, right? Then if the after born kids who

01:13:25 --> 01:13:26

you didn't name because you didn't update it?

01:13:29 --> 01:13:33

That could happen? Well, you said that it goes by the intent of the

01:13:33 --> 01:13:38

the guy the the deceased. Right. And he intends to understand how

01:13:38 --> 01:13:40

he intends to understand

01:13:41 --> 01:13:44

gender. And you're right. That's a thorny one. I mean, it's not it's

01:13:44 --> 01:13:47

makes a good for a good joke, but I can probably see this happening

01:13:47 --> 01:13:50

at some point. It'll have to be litigated. Yeah, it would. It

01:13:50 --> 01:13:53

would be litigated, and it would depend on all the facts and kind

01:13:53 --> 01:13:54

of okay, very good.

01:13:55 --> 01:14:01

Optics team is very appreciative of what you bring here. Good. All

01:14:01 --> 01:14:05

right. Harris says one air wants the house, one air wants the

01:14:05 --> 01:14:05

jewelry.

01:14:07 --> 01:14:10

This is a shoddy question here. And the answer to that is that

01:14:11 --> 01:14:14

doesn't matter what they want. Every air inheritor

01:14:16 --> 01:14:20

deserves a portion of every asset. So let's say the guy's got a

01:14:20 --> 01:14:24

company. He's got a house, he's got cash, he's got jewelry,

01:14:25 --> 01:14:26

all of great.

01:14:29 --> 01:14:34

Big amounts. Every single inheritor deserves their share of

01:14:34 --> 01:14:39

each. We can say, girls, you take the jewelry, guys, you take the

01:14:39 --> 01:14:43

cars can't do that. Right? Because you assume that that's what they

01:14:43 --> 01:14:47

know, because they might not benefit from that. Right? So the

01:14:47 --> 01:14:50

gold Yes, he may not wear it, but he may sell it. He may not wear

01:14:50 --> 01:14:52

it, but he may give it to his daughter as a gift someday. So you

01:14:52 --> 01:14:57

can't assume it's not by assuming who's going to benefit from what

01:14:57 --> 01:15:00

and it's not by assuming the value of every

01:15:00 --> 01:15:02

You think because I could change, and it's not by what the

01:15:02 --> 01:15:06

inheritors, like, so I really want the car. So afterwards they could

01:15:06 --> 01:15:10

do that. So after you you earn dessert have one half of the gold

01:15:10 --> 01:15:14

Do you have one half of the of the luxury cars after you guys own it

01:15:14 --> 01:15:16

make with whatever trade you want after that, but you must take

01:15:16 --> 01:15:21

possession of your percentage of everything, which is the housing

01:15:21 --> 01:15:24

market might go up and the gold goes down. So then

01:15:25 --> 01:15:28

iniquity happens if Yeah, go up.

01:15:29 --> 01:15:30

When it comes to debt,

01:15:32 --> 01:15:37

does it go to the trust? Or? Because in the Sharia, the way it

01:15:37 --> 01:15:41

works is that it comes out of the Will the debt roll? Before it's

01:15:41 --> 01:15:45

inherited? If you have a debt, yeah, so how does it work? Well,

01:15:45 --> 01:15:49

who inherit who earned the debt? The person who died? From what

01:15:49 --> 01:15:53

wealth from his own wealth that's that gets inherited? Yeah. So it

01:15:53 --> 01:15:54

goes from there, we're not going to come from the trust, right?

01:15:55 --> 01:16:00

Because, because I'm asking about like, the trust rate setup, since

01:16:00 --> 01:16:05

he talks about putting all of your inheritance in the trust. So how

01:16:05 --> 01:16:07

does that feel the trust is going to be the main, so if you have a

01:16:07 --> 01:16:10

trust set up in this particular fashion, I mean, there's different

01:16:10 --> 01:16:12

types of trust. And you could use them differently, right. So like

01:16:12 --> 01:16:15

we don't, we can do asset protection trusts, where he's

01:16:15 --> 01:16:17

like, hey, I want I want this money, but I want to protect it

01:16:17 --> 01:16:22

from creditors or whatever. But we're talking about like, a

01:16:22 --> 01:16:25

revocable trust with the pourover wills, the trust is the one that's

01:16:25 --> 01:16:27

administrating your estate, the will is not doing anything except

01:16:27 --> 01:16:31

for the trust. So it's like the trust and well what we're talking

01:16:31 --> 01:16:35

about here, these are the state instruments that exist, that allow

01:16:35 --> 01:16:38

us to carry out what the Sharia distribution would be in a way

01:16:38 --> 01:16:41

that's most efficient in a way that makes the most sense. In a

01:16:41 --> 01:16:44

Sharia country, like the West see as what you would have written

01:16:44 --> 01:16:48

down, everything else goes through the Islamic law anyway. So you're

01:16:48 --> 01:16:49

gonna subtract

01:16:50 --> 01:16:54

burial cost, and that's then everything pours into the trust,

01:16:54 --> 01:16:57

credit, you're also gonna have taxes, Oh, you gotta pay

01:16:58 --> 01:17:01

taxes. And just quick point on this, which we didn't I don't

01:17:01 --> 01:17:04

think we really got into another part of your state planning is

01:17:04 --> 01:17:07

planning in a way that can help you save money on your taxes,

01:17:07 --> 01:17:10

because also you can get hit. If you're inherit something, you can

01:17:10 --> 01:17:13

get hit with more taxes or less taxes, depending on how you

01:17:13 --> 01:17:16

inherited and oftentimes it's better to do that to a trust,

01:17:16 --> 01:17:20

there's, you know, more tax benefits. So you want to talk

01:17:20 --> 01:17:24

with, you know, a tax professional about planning that out? Did you

01:17:24 --> 01:17:28

give me a quick idea what the federal and state taxes are on

01:17:29 --> 01:17:33

when it when a death occurs on both the deceased estate on the

01:17:33 --> 01:17:37

estate and the IRS this recipients? Yeah, the estate tax

01:17:37 --> 01:17:41

has an exemption of 13 million on the federal level.

01:17:42 --> 01:17:45

That means that everything under 30 million is not taxed, anything

01:17:45 --> 01:17:48

above 13 million is going to be taxed. Right, shoot, I'm going to

01:17:48 --> 01:17:50

be taxed. So people are

01:17:51 --> 01:17:53

people have been pretty like laid back, because like most people

01:17:53 --> 01:17:55

aren't going to meet that threshold. But the problem is that

01:17:56 --> 01:17:59

that 13 million exemption is going to sunset in 2025.

01:18:00 --> 01:18:03

And what's it going to be replaced with? We don't know that that's

01:18:03 --> 01:18:06

going to depend on the Congress, the next is coming up Congress. So

01:18:06 --> 01:18:08

it's gonna it's gonna depend heavily on the election this year.

01:18:09 --> 01:18:12

So Congress will then either vote to, you know, maintain that 13

01:18:12 --> 01:18:15

million, or they're going to bring it down and, you know, you know,

01:18:15 --> 01:18:18

which one's gonna go depending on which party wins, but there's a

01:18:18 --> 01:18:21

strong likelihood that this could also come down significantly.

01:18:21 --> 01:18:25

Right. And then there's also state exemption, and that's also lower

01:18:25 --> 01:18:28

right, the state exemption, New Jersey used to be 670,000. It's

01:18:28 --> 01:18:31

higher now, that could also come back down. So these things go up

01:18:31 --> 01:18:35

and down, based on, you know, Congress and Senate and all that

01:18:35 --> 01:18:38

stuff. So, you know, you got to make your plan. According, you

01:18:38 --> 01:18:41

know, you got to make a plan to minimize any kind of tax burden as

01:18:41 --> 01:18:44

much as the 670 1000 is a lot of people are going to have that. So

01:18:44 --> 01:18:48

what's the percentage of tax on that? It's higher on on

01:18:49 --> 01:18:52

six it was before now it's raised higher. I don't remember the exact

01:18:52 --> 01:18:55

number but I'm saying it could come down. The tax above that is

01:18:55 --> 01:18:58

very high estate tax is very high. It's like, think the federal

01:18:58 --> 01:19:03

estate tax is 40% 40 percents famous case of James Gandolfini,

01:19:04 --> 01:19:09

who left he planned his estate poorly and left 80% exposed to

01:19:09 --> 01:19:15

estate tax. He paid 55% total state taxes. Here's the thing that

01:19:15 --> 01:19:18

he didn't pay that they stole from him. He stole it. Yeah. What is he

01:19:18 --> 01:19:23

an actor for what for? Sopranos? Sopranos? Yeah, New Jersey, New

01:19:23 --> 01:19:26

Jersey guy so yeah, it's a fake mafioso, you should had that stuff

01:19:26 --> 01:19:30

tucked away. Somebody bags between the body bags, and some shoes

01:19:30 --> 01:19:33

would say that it's your obligation to avoid paying taxes

01:19:33 --> 01:19:34

as much as possible.

01:19:36 --> 01:19:40

Possible. I mean, I mean, that's not something that this is theft,

01:19:40 --> 01:19:45

right? In our in our * stuff. If someone is an only child

01:19:45 --> 01:19:48

and the parents pass away, that only child doesn't receive the

01:19:48 --> 01:19:53

entirety of the inheritance. However, can those parents gift a

01:19:53 --> 01:19:55

large portion of it prior to death?

01:19:56 --> 01:19:59

The answer is yes. Because they don't have to but not

01:20:00 --> 01:20:03

On the deathbed, they have a car accident, they're still alive on

01:20:03 --> 01:20:06

ventilators, then they gift away all their money not allowed.

01:20:07 --> 01:20:10

Right, just gonna be a hold on that gift. And if the guy then

01:20:10 --> 01:20:13

marries another woman real quick, so you can inherit one if

01:20:14 --> 01:20:17

the marriage is valid inheritance does not apply to her, anything

01:20:17 --> 01:20:21

that happens on the deathbed is not going to apply. And that's a

01:20:21 --> 01:20:24

good case, if you have like an only child where you'd want to set

01:20:24 --> 01:20:28

up a trust that might you know, where the property transfers after

01:20:28 --> 01:20:31

a certain age or they gain control of it after a certain age.

01:20:32 --> 01:20:35

Situation use that, right. So you could put a put the money in a

01:20:35 --> 01:20:38

trust, this is this is your property, but you have the right

01:20:38 --> 01:20:43

to act upon it. And use it at the age of 22. Yeah, you can also have

01:20:43 --> 01:20:47

it payout distributions yearly, or quarterly or whatever. So you

01:20:47 --> 01:20:50

know, they get like, you know, $1,000 every every quarter month

01:20:50 --> 01:20:53

or something. Yeah. Or every month, they get a certain amount.

01:20:53 --> 01:20:56

But then after they hit the age of like, 32, they claimed they didn't

01:20:56 --> 01:21:00

have control over what they want to do. Very good. Yeah. Tell them

01:21:00 --> 01:21:03

Sansome What did we change the situation? No longer she's an only

01:21:03 --> 01:21:06

child say she has a brother doesn't matter if multiple

01:21:06 --> 01:21:07

children and do decide to give

01:21:09 --> 01:21:10

equity.

01:21:11 --> 01:21:15

She they have to three kids. They cannot gift one and ignore the

01:21:15 --> 01:21:17

others they must give equally.

01:21:19 --> 01:21:22

Harris says are the Sharia certified? Are there? Sharia

01:21:22 --> 01:21:25

certified lawyers? Is there anything like that? So you guys

01:21:25 --> 01:21:29

are part of the Muslim Association? Do you guys have a

01:21:29 --> 01:21:34

standard of knowledge that, let's say in this subject? Is there a

01:21:35 --> 01:21:39

bar exam for inheritance in let's say any method? That would be

01:21:39 --> 01:21:42

good, like just privately amongst you guys. So you guys created a

01:21:42 --> 01:21:47

bar, where you want to talk about inheritance? Have you passed this

01:21:47 --> 01:21:49

examination that you we know that you

01:21:50 --> 01:21:52

can now speak on this matter?

01:21:53 --> 01:21:56

That's basically what he's asking. Yeah, I mean, look from from a

01:21:56 --> 01:21:58

structural point of view, from like an infrastructure point of

01:21:58 --> 01:22:01

view, there's a lot of things that we could do that would benefit to

01:22:01 --> 01:22:04

get into the even when we talking about trust and estate. So having

01:22:04 --> 01:22:07

Sharia certified lawyers would be great, right? Because you know

01:22:07 --> 01:22:10

that you have this baseline of knowledge. And then you have the

01:22:10 --> 01:22:14

knowledge of the state law and federal law that you need to kind

01:22:14 --> 01:22:17

of mix it together. From my experience. My My experience is

01:22:17 --> 01:22:22

not as it's just I've experienced with Sharia law and inheritance

01:22:23 --> 01:22:27

and a knowledge of US state law. So I can I can implement it. But

01:22:27 --> 01:22:29

like, ultimately, I'm going to do what you want, right? So if you're

01:22:29 --> 01:22:32

my client, and you say, like, my Mufti says, X, I said, Okay, I'll

01:22:32 --> 01:22:35

do we'll do X for you. Someone says, oh, you know, my, you know,

01:22:35 --> 01:22:37

Sheikh said this, and I'll say, Okay, we'll do it that way for

01:22:37 --> 01:22:39

you. So that's, that's kind of what we do. Well, we have an

01:22:39 --> 01:22:41

understanding of what the implications are. And sometimes

01:22:41 --> 01:22:44

people ask us for stuff that we think it's worth this is clearly

01:22:44 --> 01:22:46

outside the bounds of Sharia. So if you want Sharia Well, what

01:22:46 --> 01:22:49

you're asking for, and it usually comes in the form of, you know, a

01:22:49 --> 01:22:51

person is married, who was married, had kids with the

01:22:51 --> 01:22:55

previous wife hasn't is married now. And his new wife wants him to

01:22:55 --> 01:22:59

disown his previous children from from the state that we'd like this

01:22:59 --> 01:23:02

is clearly outside of the bounds. And you asked me for sure we will.

01:23:02 --> 01:23:05

But you asked me to do this, you know, there's absolutely no way.

01:23:05 --> 01:23:09

So from a from a professional standpoint, you advertise

01:23:09 --> 01:23:13

advertise your service as a studio will. And that's what allows you

01:23:13 --> 01:23:17

to not serve as a person who wants to contravene the shittier.

01:23:18 --> 01:23:22

Yeah, I mean, look, if somebody comes to me and says, This is what

01:23:22 --> 01:23:25

my Sheikh says. So my thing is, I look, I'm not a sheikh, I'm not a

01:23:25 --> 01:23:29

scholar, if your Sheikh has XYZ opinion, I don't know I'm going to

01:23:29 --> 01:23:31

do what you want, right? But if somebody comes to me and says, I

01:23:31 --> 01:23:34

want to share well, but I want to do also I want to disown my

01:23:34 --> 01:23:36

previous child, I can be like, Hey, you're not getting a shirt.

01:23:36 --> 01:23:39

Well, there's this, there's not going to happen. So So that's the

01:23:39 --> 01:23:43

kind of stuff that we see. But the other thing that we from, from a

01:23:43 --> 01:23:46

Muslim and from infrastructure point of view and a community is

01:23:46 --> 01:23:49

that what happens when there are disputes inheritance, when there's

01:23:49 --> 01:23:52

a will there's not a well, or there's a trust that's not drafted

01:23:52 --> 01:23:55

properly, something like that, and disputes arise. These things don't

01:23:55 --> 01:23:58

have to go to court. These things can be arbitrated, and you can

01:23:58 --> 01:24:01

include arbitration clauses in the wills. And an arbitration could be

01:24:01 --> 01:24:06

done by somebody who is a chef or a Mufti or somebody who has Sharia

01:24:06 --> 01:24:09

qualifications can be the arbitrator, and they could be

01:24:09 --> 01:24:12

named and you can, you can have an institution that has, you know, a

01:24:12 --> 01:24:16

roster of arbitrators, right, and you just in the will and the

01:24:16 --> 01:24:19

trust, you can just reference this institution and say, Look, if any

01:24:19 --> 01:24:23

dispute arises, it will go to arbitration, and arbitration is

01:24:23 --> 01:24:26

binding. And the state law allows the arbitrator to a binding and

01:24:26 --> 01:24:28

these are infrastructures that, you know, we can easily set up and

01:24:28 --> 01:24:31

it would benefit everyone. Common question here.

01:24:33 --> 01:24:40

father dies is American estate is distributed, but his properties in

01:24:40 --> 01:24:41

Egypt or Pakistan?

01:24:42 --> 01:24:46

Are not that's something that the US lawyer really I don't think you

01:24:46 --> 01:24:49

have anything in your hand for that. Right. So that's up to the

01:24:49 --> 01:24:52

individual that he's gonna have to work that out in each of those

01:24:52 --> 01:24:55

countries because they're gonna have their own laws. Maybe if it's

01:24:55 --> 01:24:58

a Muslim country, it's more easily done, because they might just

01:24:58 --> 01:24:59

naturally follow that even if you don't have

01:25:00 --> 01:25:02

Like, whatever, but then you're gonna have to balance that out,

01:25:02 --> 01:25:04

you're gonna have to figure out all your assets and make sure

01:25:04 --> 01:25:08

they're divided in the correct manner. Very good. Very good. All

01:25:08 --> 01:25:11

right, let's go to

01:25:12 --> 01:25:17

writing a will. What is a practical method of writing a

01:25:17 --> 01:25:23

will? Do I sit up my computer? And just off the top of my head? Say I

01:25:23 --> 01:25:28

got 20,000 in Bitcoin? 20,000 in coin Base 20,000 in stash? Or do I

01:25:28 --> 01:25:33

need to provide the receipts? Do I need to provide the logins? Right?

01:25:34 --> 01:25:38

Like, what is the value of $50,000 in coin base, but no one has a

01:25:38 --> 01:25:38

login?

01:25:40 --> 01:25:44

Yeah, I mean, well, the first thing is, the ideal situation is,

01:25:45 --> 01:25:48

you go to a lawyer, and you tell them what you what you want, and

01:25:48 --> 01:25:52

how you want your state to be distributed or divided. You

01:25:52 --> 01:25:55

sitting there drafting it by yourself might not be the ideal

01:25:55 --> 01:25:58

thing, because then it also more likely to probably be disputed.

01:25:59 --> 01:26:02

And then what happens if you if you just had a will, the executor

01:26:02 --> 01:26:06

is the person that has to now find all your assets, locate them, and

01:26:06 --> 01:26:09

figure out okay, how can I utilize these, what's the logins, figuring

01:26:09 --> 01:26:12

out all that stuff, that's something you want to plan ahead

01:26:12 --> 01:26:16

of time and kind of have that written down as a procedural plan

01:26:16 --> 01:26:21

for in the event that I die this is because you can have access

01:26:21 --> 01:26:25

codes and logins and all that kind of stuff. You can imagine them in

01:26:25 --> 01:26:29

the headache. When someone if someone were to immediately die or

01:26:29 --> 01:26:31

immediately go into a coma, Do you how many? How many things are at a

01:26:31 --> 01:26:35

standstill just because of logins, even your electricity bill, even

01:26:35 --> 01:26:39

you're paying the taxes, right? Everything is now by codes and

01:26:39 --> 01:26:40

logins.

01:26:41 --> 01:26:46

Forget the assets, just the stuff that I have to pay, you know, to

01:26:46 --> 01:26:51

keep up the upkeep of the life in the house and everything. Yeah, so

01:26:51 --> 01:26:53

I mean, nowadays, that's become big issues of now we do that we

01:26:53 --> 01:26:56

have what's called Digital estate planning. So you plan for your

01:26:56 --> 01:26:59

digital assets? And how that thing can be, you know?

01:27:00 --> 01:27:02

And does that involve, like, some kind of,

01:27:04 --> 01:27:08

I don't know, safe place for them to put all their passwords. Yeah,

01:27:08 --> 01:27:11

you would have to come up with some sort of mechanism that your

01:27:11 --> 01:27:13

executor or trustee would be aware of, or would have access to

01:27:13 --> 01:27:16

someplace, and then but you have to keep updating it. And then

01:27:16 --> 01:27:20

there's ways obviously from the, you know, the to be able to have

01:27:20 --> 01:27:23

the information available to to access these things, right. So

01:27:23 --> 01:27:26

like, if you somebody dies, and you can, you know, you can take

01:27:26 --> 01:27:30

control of their Facebook account, you know, just by showing certain

01:27:30 --> 01:27:32

things and saying that you're the executor and happy to document to

01:27:32 --> 01:27:34

show it. Okay, good.

01:27:38 --> 01:27:41

Has there ever been an example where the executor of the will has

01:27:41 --> 01:27:41

gone rogue?

01:27:45 --> 01:27:48

I laughed, because I dealt with that very directly. So I was

01:27:48 --> 01:27:51

dealing, one of the cases I had was, when I litigated litigated a

01:27:51 --> 01:27:55

probate, I was representing a beneficiary who stood to inherit

01:27:55 --> 01:28:00

close to $300,000 from that particular state. And the executor

01:28:01 --> 01:28:03

came before he hired me, the executive came to him and said,

01:28:03 --> 01:28:07

Oh, I'm gonna, I'll give you 50k Right now in cash, and then the

01:28:07 --> 01:28:09

rest, we're going to set up a nonprofit that I'm going to set

01:28:09 --> 01:28:12

up, which is not in the world. And then he came to me. And then I

01:28:12 --> 01:28:17

said, Oh, this is, you know, this is crazy. So I started, I started

01:28:17 --> 01:28:18

talking this guy, and then I quickly realized that this guy is

01:28:18 --> 01:28:19

completely crazy executive.

01:28:21 --> 01:28:24

So I filed the motion to have the executive removed, and I want the

01:28:24 --> 01:28:28

motion. Oh, great. How did you prove he was not right? I mean, I

01:28:28 --> 01:28:31

just did it out of the facts as to what was happening and what kind

01:28:31 --> 01:28:34

of stuff he was doing that was that was contrary towards in the

01:28:34 --> 01:28:37

will. So I went and then when, and then when this guy spoke in front

01:28:37 --> 01:28:41

of the judge kind of close the case. They moved them as an

01:28:41 --> 01:28:42

executor. And then

01:28:43 --> 01:28:47

And then, you know, then the judge appoints an administrator. So

01:28:47 --> 01:28:49

there's a court appointed administrator, who takes the

01:28:49 --> 01:28:52

place, usually a lawyer. And that's like, a two, three month

01:28:52 --> 01:28:55

process to file the motion and grab the hearing and everything.

01:28:55 --> 01:28:58

Yeah, I like to give the timeline of these hearings because it's

01:28:58 --> 01:29:00

like, people think sometimes it's like, you're gonna solve the

01:29:00 --> 01:29:04

problem in two weeks or something, but not the case. Okay.

01:29:06 --> 01:29:09

All right. Let's go to another question here. A lot of questions

01:29:09 --> 01:29:15

for you guys. Here. Would it be advisable to start adding a clause

01:29:16 --> 01:29:19

says ubiquitous stipulating that all inheritance is according to

01:29:19 --> 01:29:23

biological gender assigned at birth? Is that something you

01:29:23 --> 01:29:26

advise people to do these days just in case one of them goes out

01:29:26 --> 01:29:30

and goes to Berkeley? Or goes to? I don't know, whatever, these

01:29:30 --> 01:29:32

universities that comes out with these ideas?

01:29:34 --> 01:29:37

I mean, considering the times, yeah. Yeah. And there's no loss,

01:29:37 --> 01:29:40

right. There's no less than that. Yeah. But uh, you're also the

01:29:40 --> 01:29:43

better off to assign your name. Assign the name. Sorry. Yeah.

01:29:45 --> 01:29:48

Yeah, you you could do both. You could assign the names, but then

01:29:48 --> 01:29:52

also lists, you know, say what he said because, again, what if you

01:29:52 --> 01:29:57

die while your wife is pregnant? Right. The kid comes after they're

01:29:57 --> 01:29:59

not deemed directly in the will so you know that that's the

01:30:00 --> 01:30:05

tuition problem. Here's a question person apostates out of Islam, and

01:30:05 --> 01:30:10

the father didn't update the will. What do you as lawyers do, says

01:30:10 --> 01:30:13

Shetty. I will distribute according to reliance of the

01:30:13 --> 01:30:20

traveler w 5.6. To WC point eight, right? Yeah, yeah. If anyone knows

01:30:20 --> 01:30:24

realigned to the travel, that's how it's set up. So now child,

01:30:24 --> 01:30:27

unfortunately, it passes out of Islam and passes don't inherit,

01:30:27 --> 01:30:28

are you going to apply that?

01:30:30 --> 01:30:33

I mean, that's that's a tough one. But the question becomes like,

01:30:33 --> 01:30:38

what, you know, if it's an outward you know, they're very outwardly

01:30:38 --> 01:30:41

not Muslim, or are they claiming that, you know, I'm Muslim? I

01:30:41 --> 01:30:44

don't pray I don't do this. It becomes an issue of like, it's a

01:30:44 --> 01:30:48

judgment call for the executor and no, open apostate. Yeah, got a

01:30:48 --> 01:30:50

Twitter account and everything. Yeah, I mean, look in because the

01:30:50 --> 01:30:53

thing is that you're, you're incorporating the chapter realize,

01:30:53 --> 01:30:55

like, let's say that you're you're doing the world that I made for

01:30:55 --> 01:30:57

you, and you've incorporated the entire chapter of one's travel and

01:30:57 --> 01:31:00

it says, a non Muslim cannot inherit from you, then therefore,

01:31:00 --> 01:31:01

you will they will not inherit

01:31:02 --> 01:31:07

might be a court issue, where now they want to inherit, and they go,

01:31:07 --> 01:31:09

No, I'm actually Muslim. What's the judge gonna say? You know,

01:31:09 --> 01:31:10

that's true.

01:31:11 --> 01:31:14

Well, even in Sharia, we would probably recognize that as well.

01:31:14 --> 01:31:19

Yeah. Right. Take your face by what is the role of tenancy in

01:31:19 --> 01:31:22

common and joint tenancy contracts? Reminded me of law

01:31:22 --> 01:31:22

school

01:31:25 --> 01:31:30

tenancy here, I guess, being a tenant? No, no, it's about

01:31:30 --> 01:31:34

ownership. So there's, there's different kinds of ownership. So

01:31:34 --> 01:31:36

like, for example, if you're married, right, this the legal

01:31:36 --> 01:31:38

fiction I was talking about earlier, if you're married, then

01:31:38 --> 01:31:40

when you die a certain portion,

01:31:41 --> 01:31:44

whatever your portion was, goes to your spouse, like, that's one type

01:31:44 --> 01:31:48

of I forgot which tenancy that is to find the word tenancy here for

01:31:48 --> 01:31:51

us. I thought they miss misspelled it.

01:31:52 --> 01:31:56

Define the word tenancy. In this context, it means the ownership of

01:31:56 --> 01:31:59

the house, it doesn't mean the a tenant as as a landlord, tenant

01:31:59 --> 01:32:03

ownership means ownership. So basically, a tenancy in common is

01:32:03 --> 01:32:08

like, we all own a house together, but we put it we own a share of

01:32:08 --> 01:32:13

the house. So you own you know, 50%, I own 30%. So if I die, you

01:32:13 --> 01:32:16

know, you you have 2% share at the other 30% is gonna go to my heirs,

01:32:16 --> 01:32:20

right? It's a split of the ownership right. A joint tenancy

01:32:20 --> 01:32:23

is that we both own 100%. That's the legal fiction, because it's

01:32:23 --> 01:32:26

not possible for which we will own 100%. But in a joint tenancy, we

01:32:26 --> 01:32:27

both own 100% of it.

01:32:28 --> 01:32:34

Okay, here is a quick question, can you please suggest websites

01:32:34 --> 01:32:36

where I could plug in my family members, and he could give me a

01:32:36 --> 01:32:41

fraction, a reliable website? Of course, we're, we don't, you're

01:32:41 --> 01:32:43

not going to write your will based upon this website. But if you're

01:32:43 --> 01:32:47

curious, there are websites out there, can you advise some of

01:32:47 --> 01:32:50

these websites that are reliable in the English language?

01:32:52 --> 01:32:55

That does the whole charade distributions? I mean, yes or no,

01:32:55 --> 01:32:59

for example, it'll sell to you click what relatives you have, and

01:32:59 --> 01:33:04

how many and then it will tell you 5% goes to so and so your wife

01:33:04 --> 01:33:08

will get X percent. Do you have any one of those hobbies Sherea

01:33:08 --> 01:33:09

was comes to mind.

01:33:10 --> 01:33:12

Maybe seekers guidance might have one I'm not

01:33:13 --> 01:33:18

quick rundown for everybody. If if a woman dies, her husband and she

01:33:18 --> 01:33:22

does have children, then her husband will get 1/4 Her mom and

01:33:22 --> 01:33:26

dad will get one six, if they're still alive, and then the

01:33:26 --> 01:33:30

remainder is distributed to the children. The boys will get two

01:33:30 --> 01:33:33

shares, the girls will get one share. If it's reversed. Now the

01:33:33 --> 01:33:37

husband dies, his wife and he does have children, he gets 1/8 parents

01:33:37 --> 01:33:42

get one six, same distribution to the children. Now if

01:33:43 --> 01:33:47

there are no children, then the fractions we mentioned for spouse

01:33:47 --> 01:33:48

and parents double.

01:33:50 --> 01:33:56

And then the father, her father, is the air receives all the

01:33:56 --> 01:33:57

remainder. Good.

01:33:58 --> 01:34:03

So that's tele aims is question. All right, and that's very clear

01:34:03 --> 01:34:07

in the Quran. What is the role? We answered the tendency question

01:34:11 --> 01:34:14

I should but you're asking for a marital website. So we're on

01:34:14 --> 01:34:20

death. So you need to wait for past that. We're on death. Right.

01:34:20 --> 01:34:25

But a marital website in New York area, I guess my Weda go to

01:34:25 --> 01:34:28

mbyc.org and type in Melinda. I guess you could do that.

01:34:29 --> 01:34:32

And you could type in your details and try to get married. And

01:34:32 --> 01:34:36

they'll look email you though. Look at your file. Look at other

01:34:36 --> 01:34:41

people's file and an email you. Okay? Yes. So my question is kind

01:34:41 --> 01:34:41

of large. So

01:34:43 --> 01:34:47

a very large family like brothers, brothers wives. They all live in a

01:34:47 --> 01:34:51

very big house. Good. Anyone has your own wing? Yep. Let's say the

01:34:51 --> 01:34:56

house is under one brother's name. And then somehow, one way he put

01:34:56 --> 01:34:59

the will of the house goes to a son or

01:35:00 --> 01:35:00

Yeah.

01:35:02 --> 01:35:04

So unlawfully he inherited he

01:35:06 --> 01:35:10

that's unlawful by Shinya to render the inheritance of the

01:35:10 --> 01:35:13

house to only to one of his many sons, just one that's unlawful.

01:35:15 --> 01:35:18

So let's say okay, but you guys, he has brothers, brothers, wives,

01:35:18 --> 01:35:19

parents.

01:35:20 --> 01:35:25

It's a fairly distributed house. Law wise, it's only under one

01:35:25 --> 01:35:26

brother's name.

01:35:27 --> 01:35:30

After like, let's say that brother passes away. What is the split?

01:35:30 --> 01:35:35

Okay, great question. Forget that. Let's go to the bigger question of

01:35:35 --> 01:35:41

that. Dad runs a business or owns a home, let's say hypothetically,

01:35:41 --> 01:35:42

for tax reasons.

01:35:43 --> 01:35:47

He distributes these things in his kids names, but we all understand

01:35:47 --> 01:35:48

it's the debts.

01:35:49 --> 01:35:53

So sometimes a man may be for example, he's, he's illegal.

01:35:55 --> 01:36:00

But he made it big in some some trade that he did. So he puts

01:36:00 --> 01:36:03

everything in his kid's name who is legal. But with the whole

01:36:03 --> 01:36:07

family understands, it's actually the dads. That's overarching

01:36:07 --> 01:36:12

because that's a big legal problem. Now the dad dies. And

01:36:12 --> 01:36:15

they say, Hey, where's my inheritance? What? Inheritance?

01:36:15 --> 01:36:18

Your dad doesn't own anything? It's all my name. Yeah, that's a

01:36:18 --> 01:36:21

big problem. Right? Yeah. That's a big thorny mess. And it goes back

01:36:21 --> 01:36:24

to his goodwill of the sun. Yeah, right.

01:36:25 --> 01:36:29

Should Yeah, issue as well as what Council's intention and what's

01:36:29 --> 01:36:32

actually enforceable? It's going to be a mess, both legally and

01:36:32 --> 01:36:36

video wise. No, it's a mess in in every way, shape and form. Okay?

01:36:48 --> 01:36:50

Here's thoughts one out.

01:36:51 --> 01:36:54

Since the women getting less inheritance, not women, daughters,

01:36:54 --> 01:36:56

his daughters are just expected that the husbands will take care

01:36:56 --> 01:37:01

of them. They getting less than the males in the family must

01:37:01 --> 01:37:04

therefore the males must provide for them. Yes, that's correct. How

01:37:04 --> 01:37:08

do you make providing for the women in your family a condition

01:37:08 --> 01:37:12

of inheritance? Well, the answer is that it's not a condition in

01:37:12 --> 01:37:15

the inheritance. You cannot put conditional inheritance. It's a

01:37:15 --> 01:37:18

separate condition by Allah subhanaw taala. And by the Sharia,

01:37:18 --> 01:37:20

so for example, nobody could put

01:37:22 --> 01:37:27

brother you're going to inherit x to x, on the condition that you

01:37:27 --> 01:37:29

take care of your daughter. Firstly, it's a vague condition.

01:37:30 --> 01:37:34

And secondly, unenforceable condition. And so there, you can't

01:37:34 --> 01:37:36

do that. He's going to inherit it regardless.

01:37:37 --> 01:37:40

Alright, so that's a video question more than a legal

01:37:40 --> 01:37:44

question. And there's a separate ruling in the shear that he, if

01:37:44 --> 01:37:46

let's say she doesn't get married, and there's no uncle, no grandpa

01:37:46 --> 01:37:50

than he has to take care of. But can you? But that's the sheer

01:37:50 --> 01:37:53

point of view, because it's really two different places, right? But

01:37:53 --> 01:37:58

if you're doing a trust, or a Will you where you can condition the

01:37:58 --> 01:38:01

inheritance? Could you then incorporate two elements of Sharia

01:38:01 --> 01:38:05

into that? Because now this is this is a legal document. Repeat

01:38:05 --> 01:38:08

that again. So you're saying that you cannot condition in the in the

01:38:08 --> 01:38:12

Sharia law, there's a within the inheritance law, there's a there's

01:38:12 --> 01:38:16

a ruling, and then within the other commands, that, you know,

01:38:16 --> 01:38:20

the brother, for example, has a right there in two different

01:38:20 --> 01:38:22

places. And they both apply, right? Yeah. But when we're

01:38:22 --> 01:38:25

drafting up a legal document, that's gonna be enforceable, which

01:38:25 --> 01:38:28

is not we're trying to make it approximate the Sharia? Could we

01:38:28 --> 01:38:31

then condition the inheritance on something very specific, like the

01:38:31 --> 01:38:34

brother is responsible to take care of her rent or housing or

01:38:34 --> 01:38:38

medical or something like that? No, I never heard of that. And

01:38:38 --> 01:38:44

should you Google it Nigeria in for to, to make the basically the

01:38:44 --> 01:38:46

document that we're drafting? Is it legal document is gonna be

01:38:46 --> 01:38:48

effective in the state of New Jersey, right, for example?

01:38:49 --> 01:38:52

We're trying to approximate the Sharia within this document. Yeah.

01:38:52 --> 01:38:55

Right. So this I can we can we can approximate the inherited

01:38:55 --> 01:38:57

distributions, because that's fairly simple. The question I'm

01:38:57 --> 01:39:01

asking is that the inheritance are conditioned in the Sharia upon

01:39:01 --> 01:39:04

this other ruling in Islam, that the brothers should take care of

01:39:04 --> 01:39:06

the sisters if no one else if they're not married, or

01:39:07 --> 01:39:09

so in this document that we're using to approximate the Sharia

01:39:09 --> 01:39:13

should we not then also condition it here? Which we could, if you

01:39:13 --> 01:39:17

say, so, for example, brothers get to x of the sisters, but the

01:39:17 --> 01:39:20

brother is responsible for it, the sisters unmarried or divorced or

01:39:20 --> 01:39:24

whatever, then the brother is responsible for housing or health

01:39:24 --> 01:39:26

care or something like that. That's it could be done,

01:39:26 --> 01:39:30

theoretically. You saying by law, it could be done? Yes. Right. If

01:39:30 --> 01:39:33

the sheriff says Surely I would approve. Yeah. Because the what

01:39:33 --> 01:39:35

are we doing with this document? We're trying to approximate the

01:39:35 --> 01:39:38

shutter? Yeah, yeah. And so if you just put the distributions then

01:39:38 --> 01:39:41

you're approximating an incomplete form of the show. Yeah. Right.

01:39:41 --> 01:39:45

Because this is conditioned upon that, versus just two separate

01:39:45 --> 01:39:48

things. I think they're two separate things from what I know.

01:39:48 --> 01:39:52

But this would have to go to a Mufti of some great experience

01:39:52 --> 01:39:53

like Shikata Mahajan.

01:39:55 --> 01:39:57

You know, most of us who are who have a lot of experience with

01:39:57 --> 01:39:58

this, but

01:39:59 --> 01:40:00

thank you

01:40:00 --> 01:40:03

Got a couple more questions before we wrap up. My uncle passed away

01:40:03 --> 01:40:09

leaving his wife, which is who beat her aunt and a daughter. So

01:40:09 --> 01:40:14

uncle dies he has wife and daughter and no parents. His

01:40:14 --> 01:40:15

brother's son

01:40:17 --> 01:40:20

is asking for a share of the inheritance.

01:40:22 --> 01:40:23

Is that jazz?

01:40:25 --> 01:40:31

So nephew, so Okay, so, woman man dies upon a wife and a daughter,

01:40:32 --> 01:40:38

the wife, the daughter gets a half the wife gets an eighth. Okay, so

01:40:38 --> 01:40:42

if we did that on eight, there's three eighths remaining. Correct

01:40:45 --> 01:40:49

that three eighths we have to review the books of inheritance to

01:40:49 --> 01:40:52

see when they in this case, who becomes inheritors? She said

01:40:52 --> 01:40:55

there's no parents. No dad, so that's we're gonna have to I can't

01:40:55 --> 01:40:58

remember who was the author, but that point sibling would be the

01:40:58 --> 01:41:00

brother but it's a brother's death. And that's what the nephew

01:41:00 --> 01:41:04

said again. Okay, so we'd have Yeah, so k is Schrock. Yeah, this

01:41:04 --> 01:41:07

is I don't want to give us any specific answers right here.

01:41:09 --> 01:41:12

Yeah, you're looking it up dark.

01:41:13 --> 01:41:14

I can look it up.

01:41:15 --> 01:41:20

Basically the ASA who's the next awesome but after absence of son

01:41:20 --> 01:41:21

absence of father?

01:41:27 --> 01:41:28

No, there's

01:41:31 --> 01:41:34

no, we have to find out who is who would be the next possible.

01:41:38 --> 01:41:42

Alright, here's while he's looking that up. Only child who inherits

01:41:42 --> 01:41:46

with no parents left? Do they have to share inheritance with living

01:41:46 --> 01:41:50

uncles, aunts and cousins? Depends if it's a boy or a girl. If it's a

01:41:50 --> 01:41:54

girl, she's the only inheritor she takes half. If it's a boy, he

01:41:54 --> 01:41:54

takes it all.

01:41:57 --> 01:42:02

How would one stop trustees changing the will of the deceased

01:42:02 --> 01:42:03

if the trust is non revocable?

01:42:06 --> 01:42:10

So what's the what's the what's the person so you're the grantor

01:42:10 --> 01:42:13

the one who creates the trust is the grantor. So while the grantor

01:42:13 --> 01:42:16

is alive, that trust can be revoked or amended was the grantor

01:42:16 --> 01:42:19

dies? It's irrevocable, irrevocable successor trustees

01:42:19 --> 01:42:22

cannot change it. They would they? Yeah. And they would they would

01:42:22 --> 01:42:25

the only way to do it is to forge it illegally, which is going to be

01:42:25 --> 01:42:28

another crime forgit illegally, which would be a massive crime. Or

01:42:28 --> 01:42:32

they would have to go to court and give a reason why it has to be

01:42:32 --> 01:42:36

amended for whatever reason, which would be almost impossible. Very

01:42:36 --> 01:42:36

good.

01:42:37 --> 01:42:40

What if the husband and wife have a joint bank account where both

01:42:40 --> 01:42:44

incomes go into the same bank account? What happens with the

01:42:44 --> 01:42:48

inheritance if the husband passes away? How to know which money is

01:42:48 --> 01:42:51

his? So again, let's take a look at this. So a man could have a

01:42:52 --> 01:42:56

job. He earns maybe a million a month, she earns maybe half a

01:42:56 --> 01:42:59

million a month. And they have How are you going to their their phone

01:42:59 --> 01:43:04

has household account, tuition account, savings account, vacation

01:43:04 --> 01:43:09

account, so many accounts with $5 million in there? Yeah, now he

01:43:09 --> 01:43:14

dies. So So joint accounts work the same way like a house would.

01:43:14 --> 01:43:17

Right? So it's a joint account, then if you die that you know your

01:43:17 --> 01:43:21

spouse takes control of that. I think it's probably easier to just

01:43:21 --> 01:43:26

have separate accounts for for inheritance purposes, right. But

01:43:26 --> 01:43:30

again, cashes like because then you have to rely on that joint

01:43:30 --> 01:43:33

account, that other person who has control has full rights and

01:43:33 --> 01:43:37

control over that account. You have to rely on them to ensure

01:43:37 --> 01:43:40

that they're gonna follow this video. Right? Yeah. Which they may

01:43:40 --> 01:43:43

or may not, you know, but even let's say they want to right?

01:43:43 --> 01:43:47

Yeah. I would take a forensic accountant to know what percentage

01:43:47 --> 01:43:48

is mine.

01:43:50 --> 01:43:52

I mean, it's gonna be part of like, so whatever your total

01:43:52 --> 01:43:55

status, right? You're gonna figure out the value of that and you're

01:43:55 --> 01:43:57

gonna divide that up with cash, it's little bit easier, right?

01:43:57 --> 01:43:59

Cash, you can figure out what percentage goes to who it goes to

01:43:59 --> 01:44:03

who, right so the wife would take, you know, it depends on like, I

01:44:03 --> 01:44:05

guess it would take a forensic accountant in the sense of who

01:44:05 --> 01:44:07

contributed what, right to know who contributed what to the

01:44:07 --> 01:44:10

account, which is why I would suggest just having separate

01:44:11 --> 01:44:14

accounts, and you know, taking care of the bills and stuff

01:44:14 --> 01:44:17

anyway. Forensic Accounting for people who don't know what that

01:44:17 --> 01:44:20

means, anything forensic means going into the fine granular

01:44:20 --> 01:44:21

details of things.

01:44:24 --> 01:44:24

Okay.

01:44:28 --> 01:44:32

Alias if a parent leaves instructions for a portion, and

01:44:32 --> 01:44:36

not another portion, how do we divide the portion that has no

01:44:36 --> 01:44:37

instructions?

01:44:38 --> 01:44:45

So let's say the guy has house cash, and he gave inheritance

01:44:45 --> 01:44:50

estate on that. He never mentioned in his state, his Bitcoin, world

01:44:50 --> 01:44:51

life that he has on the side.

01:44:54 --> 01:44:58

I mean, the distribution of assets not done according to the assets

01:44:58 --> 01:44:59

you don't you don't appoint each as

01:45:00 --> 01:45:03

that you who it goes to, right? You just say this is the shares

01:45:03 --> 01:45:07

that it gets distributed into the trustee and the executor combined

01:45:07 --> 01:45:11

will then locate all of his assets at that time. And then they will

01:45:11 --> 01:45:14

put those into a pile and then that will get distributed. Okay,

01:45:14 --> 01:45:17

good. So they'll find it though. They'll have to do some detective

01:45:17 --> 01:45:21

work, right? Yeah. Good. Good. Good. All right. Is there any

01:45:21 --> 01:45:25

chance in Shetty where one person will be the sole? inheritor? Yeah,

01:45:25 --> 01:45:29

it could be if there's only one son. man dies upon one son.

01:45:30 --> 01:45:33

There's only a father and son living. That's it? Nobody else.

01:45:33 --> 01:45:36

Yeah, they inherit each other 100% whoever dies first.

01:45:38 --> 01:45:42

All right, gentlemen. Again, the name of your organ is your your

01:45:42 --> 01:45:45

firm is Seth. So you write

01:45:46 --> 01:45:51

our law firm name is Mo and Hussein Law Group. And the log of

01:45:51 --> 01:45:56

the website is Seth dot, South law.com. S ap law.com. Do you get

01:45:56 --> 01:45:57

a lot of Hindu clicks?

01:45:59 --> 01:46:04

We get some on Google. Yeah. Until they until they find out. It's

01:46:04 --> 01:46:08

saying then they click off. Right. They don't pull back. Yeah, go

01:46:08 --> 01:46:13

back. All right. Any final, the final summary and the most

01:46:13 --> 01:46:16

important question that we have comes up all the time. That type

01:46:16 --> 01:46:20

of question regarding the sister who she's

01:46:21 --> 01:46:25

a wife, she has many kids know income, live with the man for 30

01:46:25 --> 01:46:26

years, the man dies.

01:46:28 --> 01:46:30

And what I get 1/8 of the house and I'm living under the mercy of

01:46:30 --> 01:46:37

my kids. So the answer that I met in Hussein Law Group give here is

01:46:37 --> 01:46:40

I got it. Right, right. Yeah, Hussein and Ahmed, no, I'm

01:46:41 --> 01:46:46

good. How did you get in your name first? Because my name starts with

01:46:46 --> 01:46:49

an A with an A. That's what I figured. Okay. Wait, like so the

01:46:49 --> 01:46:52

people turn in the Yellow Pages? They find you first. Right. Okay.

01:46:52 --> 01:46:57

Just like apple? Yeah. So the answer to that question is that

01:46:57 --> 01:47:01

you set up a trust, you place the home in a trust with the intent

01:47:01 --> 01:47:07

not to do a healer on the shady, but to to minimize a clear

01:47:07 --> 01:47:11

visible, how does that she's going to be in and that trust will go

01:47:11 --> 01:47:16

from you to her upon death. And if she were to die, first, you revoke

01:47:16 --> 01:47:20

it as a trust. And then it becomes regular inheritance after that,

01:47:20 --> 01:47:23

because there's no issue after that. Right. And that's the answer

01:47:23 --> 01:47:27

to your question when you die. That will not be it's an endowment

01:47:27 --> 01:47:30

now. It's not private property anymore. It's an endowment that

01:47:30 --> 01:47:34

you have established for your family. upon your death. She's now

01:47:34 --> 01:47:41

the trustee and the beneficiary of the endowment. Okay. And upon her

01:47:41 --> 01:47:43

death loss, weed is not needed anymore. Upon her death. It could

01:47:43 --> 01:47:43

be

01:47:45 --> 01:47:48

distributed according to the lines of the shittier. Because there's

01:47:48 --> 01:47:51

no outage anymore. There's no issue anymore. Right? You would

01:47:51 --> 01:47:53

say that's a good summary of the

01:47:55 --> 01:47:55

that

01:47:56 --> 01:47:58

if the wife does die first, I don't think you would dissolve the

01:47:58 --> 01:48:01

trust, you would just maintain the trust and then the trust would end

01:48:01 --> 01:48:05

up. You can maintain it. Yeah. But you could technically dissolve it

01:48:05 --> 01:48:05

right.

01:48:07 --> 01:48:10

It might be more beneficial to just maintain it to maintain good.

01:48:10 --> 01:48:13

Let's say you got to go bought some very important stuff to the

01:48:13 --> 01:48:16

table. Thank you both very much for coming. churros. Thank you for

01:48:17 --> 01:48:22

taking the initiative and bringing us Tarik Hussain, who has a wealth

01:48:22 --> 01:48:28

of experience over 25 years in inheritance law. I suggest

01:48:28 --> 01:48:34

everyone go to him for this knowledge and SROs as well is, is

01:48:34 --> 01:48:36

getting very knowledgeable on the subject matter. So just one last

01:48:37 --> 01:48:39

quick question. Do you do all kinds of law

01:48:40 --> 01:48:44

or just wills estates and Testaments? Different? I mean, we

01:48:44 --> 01:48:48

do so we do general corporate law. A lot of your favorite Halal

01:48:48 --> 01:48:52

restaurants, we represent very good leases all that almost any

01:48:52 --> 01:48:57

sort of contract we handle. We do securities law. That's an area

01:48:57 --> 01:49:00

where basically, anytime you're raising capital, you're raising

01:49:00 --> 01:49:03

money, you have to do it in a legally compliant way. We help

01:49:03 --> 01:49:06

structure that so you're creating a real estate fund, for example,

01:49:06 --> 01:49:09

to go acquire a bunch of properties. We do that, you know,

01:49:09 --> 01:49:12

we have our own Sharia compliant real estate fund that we

01:49:12 --> 01:49:16

structured an area that we do, and then you know, and then we do this

01:49:16 --> 01:49:20

trusts and estates. Wonderful, very good. Very good. So anything

01:49:20 --> 01:49:23

money related, essentially no crimes. Yeah, no crimes. No

01:49:23 --> 01:49:27

divorce. We'll do criminal. No criminal no divorce. Yeah, no

01:49:27 --> 01:49:31

divorce. Yeah. All right. All the neat stuff. Very good. Thank you

01:49:31 --> 01:49:34

guys very much. Does that come along? And

01:49:35 --> 01:49:38

if you have any new developments, make sure you come back on the

01:49:38 --> 01:49:41

stream. Alright. Michael Stein. Thanks for joining.

01:49:46 --> 01:49:47

All right, ladies and gentlemen.

01:49:50 --> 01:49:55

What time is it? It's now 330 Oof. We went long.

01:49:56 --> 01:49:59

Dan see graphic designer position.

01:50:00 --> 01:50:03

Send it over again. I can't remember seeing your application,

01:50:03 --> 01:50:08

but send it over again. Get it find a way to get it to info. So

01:50:08 --> 01:50:11

if he incited that orgy, do you think Victoria said Do you think

01:50:11 --> 01:50:15

it's a good idea to talk to children about this? Of course,

01:50:16 --> 01:50:20

yeah, that's the more information the more everyone's informed and

01:50:20 --> 01:50:21

the more details

01:50:22 --> 01:50:28

are there the better because you just never know what question

01:50:28 --> 01:50:32

might come up. And I'm telling you this password thing, ask anyone

01:50:32 --> 01:50:34

who's had a family member dies suddenly

01:50:35 --> 01:50:39

it's a disaster. They cannot get into any account and they spent

01:50:39 --> 01:50:43

five hours with customer service and having to prove with death

01:50:43 --> 01:50:47

certificates and lawyers and all things just to access an account.

01:50:49 --> 01:50:51

Er really wow

01:50:53 --> 01:50:55

amazing amazing. Very good. Very good.

01:50:58 --> 01:51:01

Oh, man, I guess do a quick before

01:51:02 --> 01:51:06

the burial facial recognition do a quick before we've been we bury

01:51:06 --> 01:51:11

him? I didn't answer any questions that were not related to to this.

01:51:11 --> 01:51:15

So we stuck to the inheritance subject today. Let's move to our

01:51:15 --> 01:51:18

Wednesday. Da we know that Wednesday is the day in which the

01:51:18 --> 01:51:27

DUA is Mr. jab at a hidden unknown place between the her and us. And

01:51:27 --> 01:51:27

we hope

01:51:29 --> 01:51:32

to reach that by making dua and everyone's so we're going to

01:51:32 --> 01:51:35

recite this short Vicodin short word.

01:51:36 --> 01:51:38

And then we'll say the DA afterwards.

01:51:41 --> 01:51:44

Everyone wants to say their own private door afterwards. Leila had

01:51:44 --> 01:51:47

a lot of medical hypermobile Illa Allah and medical hubco movie in

01:51:47 --> 01:51:51

La la la la and medical doctor movie in La Isla landmen Khurana

01:51:51 --> 01:51:55

beam Sundara Amanda Rahimi enough Adana like a fat hum being

01:51:56 --> 01:51:59

the opera like Allahumma tocado and then become a talker Wait a

01:51:59 --> 01:52:04

minute, Metallica indica serata Mr. Beam when Surah Kola who

01:52:04 --> 01:52:08

Nasrin Aziza we can underline Would you would you ever do anyone

01:52:08 --> 01:52:11

else go to minimal Caribbean with Georgie a little lady Fatra sama

01:52:11 --> 01:52:15

What's your mana Rahim? nurserymen Allah he will fetch on previous

01:52:15 --> 01:52:18

she didn't want me Nino La Nina mukono solo Nika Macaulay

01:52:18 --> 01:52:21

supernumerary Madhava Yuna mineral studied Allah. Coral How are you

01:52:21 --> 01:52:26

in an unknown sobre la? Hola Hola, Illa Illa who had higher payments

01:52:26 --> 01:52:30

who sent it to law office similar to Mr. Mandela, the US founder who

01:52:30 --> 01:52:35

will be the yanapuma Boehner ad mama called formula heponiemi

01:52:35 --> 01:52:36

Shaman in me Ellerbee mash

01:52:37 --> 01:52:42

was your course you somehow it all although audio have gone Oh hold

01:52:42 --> 01:52:45

on, you know the Sundara Amanda immunogens Another Quran Allah

01:52:45 --> 01:52:49

Jabba Nara Ito Akasha matassa Dhammika Shatila you were thinking

01:52:49 --> 01:52:53

and then on the reboard in se la la mesa, Kuru. Hola, hola, de la

01:52:54 --> 01:52:55

ilaha illa. Who? Your shahada

01:52:56 --> 01:53:01

who Allah Allah Allah, Allah on medical could do Salah Mina

01:53:01 --> 01:53:06

environmental as these will check their sebahagian Allah here mostly

01:53:06 --> 01:53:08

goon who Aloha The Colbert almost

01:53:09 --> 01:53:12

all hosts Now you said the hotel enough is similar to a lot of the

01:53:12 --> 01:53:13

owners isn't a team

01:53:14 --> 01:53:17

or is there enough CV later on in column as well be within no

01:53:17 --> 01:53:20

Serbian no MC Bucha Janina voltage will be here Dana what's it going

01:53:20 --> 01:53:24

to be chef at St how Sundstrand FC Billa Kabara mucha Rima aka for

01:53:24 --> 01:53:27

abdominal genuine en Cy Young Dodona xinja with a Latina Autobot

01:53:27 --> 01:53:32

this SMA Allah Allah Allah mania Jarrah caffeine hurry Agia you are

01:53:32 --> 01:53:36

the victim insurer in which IUD mama cream omocha at him outfit

01:53:36 --> 01:53:39

nada nada Divyanka terminal genuine and Shafilea view the KVM

01:53:39 --> 01:53:43

Mohit Subhanak era Allah Masha Nick was a sort of tonic to us and

01:53:43 --> 01:53:46

to Allah will be as much we are here to learn like Colombia Allah

01:53:47 --> 01:53:50

will also allow Sana Hanuman about the lesson Turnipseed Illa Allah

01:53:50 --> 01:53:53

Allah Muhammad Rasulullah sallallahu alayhi wa sallam Allah

01:53:53 --> 01:53:59

Maha CBI Nicoletti Allah working awfully big ethical Vela you are

01:53:59 --> 01:54:03

happening because reticle life quanta Ducati what Ajay? Yeah, we

01:54:03 --> 01:54:06

had the mystery thing Yeah, we had the mystery. Taenia Reatta mystery

01:54:06 --> 01:54:09

tinea directed at Kenya directed at Kenya dedicated Harlequin

01:54:09 --> 01:54:13

unfinished articulatory Kenya triple B lane and owner a lotta

01:54:13 --> 01:54:16

Canuto COVID Hi higher in Nikki Unnikrishnan kodjia Bismillah AR

01:54:16 --> 01:54:19

KNF seeming Colima to the Yeoman Kula has allowed she felt he

01:54:19 --> 01:54:24

Bismillah Krita la mera buenas airtable Best is Fanta Shafi wa

01:54:24 --> 01:54:27

Fenton wifey that's right Alicia Fox for no other Sycamore Allah

01:54:27 --> 01:54:31

anima yah cafiero efia media Majida paniculata Avintia de doc

01:54:31 --> 01:54:34

criminal hardeeville Hadid or model the Shaadi dot Jason added,

01:54:35 --> 01:54:39

which only New Roman cuisine is a conocer luminosity Cabomba

01:54:39 --> 01:54:42

Equitana like what was on our stick? What's your either mentor

01:54:42 --> 01:54:42

either?

01:54:44 --> 01:54:47

You are Crom Well my wife, Yvonne, as you can take finiman shared

01:54:47 --> 01:54:51

equally the sharer and I can tell now hello Paula Kabara SallAllahu

01:54:51 --> 01:54:54

ala Sayidina Muhammad Anwar, he was somebody who said let me just

01:54:54 --> 01:54:57

limiter fit on top of our confy what hamdulillah

01:54:58 --> 01:54:59

Rob will let me know bye

01:55:00 --> 01:55:08

John Bolton and wilder Cooley Harlan arhaan Aurora he me in solo

01:55:08 --> 01:55:09

take a few minutes for private drop.

01:57:13 --> 01:57:17

SallAllahu ala Sayyidina Muhammad and voila early he was somebody he

01:57:17 --> 01:57:25

was salam Subhan or a beaker of Bill zety Um ILC for was monada

01:57:25 --> 01:57:31

Mursaleen our hamdulillah are below let me clean

01:57:59 --> 01:58:00

us

01:58:01 --> 01:58:01

see

01:58:07 --> 01:58:08

know

01:58:10 --> 01:58:11

who

01:58:15 --> 01:58:15

got

01:58:17 --> 01:58:17

the call

Share Page