Shadee Elmasry – Hadiths lead people astray How

Shadee Elmasry
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speaker discusses the importance of context in the discussion of Hadith's message and the need for clarification. They also mention the use of the phrase " admiting to" in the message and the need for a strong belief in it. The speaker emphasizes the need for a strong belief in Hadith's message and the need for a strong belief in the history of the message.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:00 --> 00:00:03
			That's why you need context. And
this is why thematic scholars
		
00:00:03 --> 00:00:07
			always say, and I've said it, I've
heard it directly. Al Hadith
		
00:00:07 --> 00:00:11
			Humala, right they didn't say
Matera they said Muhammad Allah.
		
00:00:11 --> 00:00:14
			And I thought that's a strange,
that's a harsh thing to say. And
		
00:00:14 --> 00:00:18
			Hadith medulla means hadith is a
source of people going astray.
		
00:00:19 --> 00:00:21
			Okay. And I thought that was
really hard. So why don't you say
		
00:00:21 --> 00:00:24
			metabo that getting lost, like
confused or lost? There's a big
		
00:00:24 --> 00:00:27
			difference being confused and
lost, could be confused is one
		
00:00:27 --> 00:00:32
			thing to go astray. Okay, big
difference between just being
		
00:00:32 --> 00:00:36
			confused or lost and astray. No,
they say it is a cause for people
		
00:00:36 --> 00:00:40
			to go astray. Why? Because none
contextualized and unexplained
		
00:00:40 --> 00:00:45
			Hadith could create for you an
image which is so untrue. And I'm
		
00:00:45 --> 00:00:50
			going to prepare actually a couple
of videos on Hadith that are found
		
00:00:50 --> 00:00:54
			in Rio de Sala Hain very popular
Hadith, that if you read them
		
00:00:54 --> 00:00:57
			isolated without an explanation,
you would take away a very harsh
		
00:00:58 --> 00:01:01
			image of the Prophet peace be upon
him and untrue. image of the
		
00:01:01 --> 00:01:04
			messenger of allah sallallahu
sunnah, right? And that's why
		
00:01:04 --> 00:01:08
			Hadith require a need and
necessitate contextualization. We
		
00:01:08 --> 00:01:14
			have great Tebow, ain and Tibet
Sebin. Like Webb, good. He went to
		
00:01:15 --> 00:01:21
			medic Ibn NS and Latham and Sam
sat. And he said that if it wasn't
		
00:01:21 --> 00:01:26
			for lathe and Malik, I would have
went astray. Right in my Eman
		
00:01:26 --> 00:01:31
			because of Hadith. Not because of
because of on contextualized and
		
00:01:31 --> 00:01:37
			unexplained Hadith, so many a
hadith, that out of context with
		
00:01:37 --> 00:01:41
			just a Muslim be like, how, right,
and there are also so many Hadith
		
00:01:41 --> 00:01:45
			that are so here, okay, that we
don't know the context. And we
		
00:01:45 --> 00:01:49
			don't really know the meaning, but
scholars have suspended their
		
00:01:49 --> 00:01:52
			meaning. So we don't we don't say
that anyone here is a liar. We
		
00:01:52 --> 00:01:55
			don't say the Prophet didn't say
it. But the meaning to us, we
		
00:01:55 --> 00:01:57
			don't know how to fit it. We don't
know what to make sense of it. And
		
00:01:57 --> 00:02:01
			it is a solitary chain Hadith. And
as a result of that, we don't have
		
00:02:01 --> 00:02:04
			to obligate belief in it. The
mimetic does this with the Hadith,
		
00:02:04 --> 00:02:09
			which is found in body of that
said that Adam was 60 yards tall?
		
00:02:09 --> 00:02:11
			Could it be Yes, right? Could it?
		
00:02:12 --> 00:02:17
			Are there challenges to that?
Possibly, right? So mimetic
		
00:02:17 --> 00:02:20
			himself did not obligate, he said,
We don't reject that it's a
		
00:02:20 --> 00:02:24
			hadith. We don't say that they're
liars. But because it's a single
		
00:02:24 --> 00:02:28
			solitary chain, meaning one or two
Sahaba narrated it, not a lot of
		
00:02:28 --> 00:02:32
			Sahaba narrated it, right. So we
don't have the context, we don't
		
00:02:32 --> 00:02:36
			have the full meaning behind that.
Good. So we cannot rule by this
		
00:02:36 --> 00:02:39
			hadith, we cannot make a judgment,
we cannot obligate belief in it.
		
00:02:39 --> 00:02:44
			That's the meaning behind. That's
the way in which the scholars
		
00:02:44 --> 00:02:48
			interact with those such heavy so
when you don't, when it's not
		
00:02:48 --> 00:02:50
			flushed out, and we don't really
know the meaning you leave it
		
00:02:50 --> 00:02:54
			suspended. That's the right way to
handle those heavies. The wrong
		
00:02:54 --> 00:02:59
			way to handle it is to force a
belief on a statement where you
		
00:02:59 --> 00:03:04
			don't know much around left or
right. Okay, so this is also how
		
00:03:04 --> 00:03:08
			why Hanafi and matagi FIP in terms
of their ritual law and their
		
00:03:08 --> 00:03:12
			other law, that they quote,
unquote, contradict certain Hadith
		
00:03:12 --> 00:03:15
			their rulings contradict certain
Hadith so many people get wonder,
		
00:03:15 --> 00:03:17
			Oh my god, the Prophet said
something but the Imam said
		
00:03:17 --> 00:03:21
			something else. No, because the
Imam has other evidences such as
		
00:03:21 --> 00:03:27
			multiple actions by many, many,
many Sahaba. Okay, upon a matter,
		
00:03:27 --> 00:03:30
			so therefore, that hadith must be
an exception, or it must have some
		
00:03:30 --> 00:03:35
			context, it must be limited, and
it's not the norm. So in that
		
00:03:35 --> 00:03:39
			respect, people have to understand
how single change and solitary
		
00:03:39 --> 00:03:42
			Hadith that come from just one or
two sources that don't have any
		
00:03:42 --> 00:03:45
			context, how we accept them, we
believe that they're from the
		
00:03:45 --> 00:03:49
			prophet but we don't have the
context to apply them. Okay. And
		
00:03:49 --> 00:03:54
			that's lit literally limited to
just the solitary narrations.
		
00:03:56 --> 00:03:59
			Now we go to the next section
here, it says welcome agile hockey
		
00:03:59 --> 00:04:00
			molded by happy you