Shadee Elmasry – Hadiths lead people astray How

That's why you need context. And this is why thematic scholars

always say, and I've said it, I've heard it directly. Al Hadith

Humala, right they didn't say Matera they said Muhammad Allah.

And I thought that's a strange, that's a harsh thing to say. And

Hadith medulla means hadith is a source of people going astray.

Okay. And I thought that was really hard. So why don't you say

metabo that getting lost, like confused or lost? There's a big

difference being confused and lost, could be confused is one

thing to go astray. Okay, big difference between just being

confused or lost and astray. No, they say it is a cause for people

to go astray. Why? Because none contextualized and unexplained

Hadith could create for you an image which is so untrue. And I'm

going to prepare actually a couple of videos on Hadith that are found

in Rio de Sala Hain very popular Hadith, that if you read them

isolated without an explanation, you would take away a very harsh

image of the Prophet peace be upon him and untrue. image of the

messenger of allah sallallahu sunnah, right? And that's why

Hadith require a need and necessitate contextualization. We

have great Tebow, ain and Tibet Sebin. Like Webb, good. He went to

medic Ibn NS and Latham and Sam sat. And he said that if it wasn't

for lathe and Malik, I would have went astray. Right in my Eman

because of Hadith. Not because of because of on contextualized and

unexplained Hadith, so many a hadith, that out of context with

just a Muslim be like, how, right, and there are also so many Hadith

that are so here, okay, that we don't know the context. And we

don't really know the meaning, but scholars have suspended their

meaning. So we don't we don't say that anyone here is a liar. We

don't say the Prophet didn't say it. But the meaning to us, we

don't know how to fit it. We don't know what to make sense of it. And

it is a solitary chain Hadith. And as a result of that, we don't have

to obligate belief in it. The mimetic does this with the Hadith,

which is found in body of that said that Adam was 60 yards tall?

Could it be Yes, right? Could it?

Are there challenges to that? Possibly, right? So mimetic

himself did not obligate, he said, We don't reject that it's a

hadith. We don't say that they're liars. But because it's a single

solitary chain, meaning one or two Sahaba narrated it, not a lot of

Sahaba narrated it, right. So we don't have the context, we don't

have the full meaning behind that. Good. So we cannot rule by this

hadith, we cannot make a judgment, we cannot obligate belief in it.

That's the meaning behind. That's the way in which the scholars

interact with those such heavy so when you don't, when it's not

flushed out, and we don't really know the meaning you leave it

suspended. That's the right way to handle those heavies. The wrong

way to handle it is to force a belief on a statement where you

don't know much around left or right. Okay, so this is also how

why Hanafi and matagi FIP in terms of their ritual law and their

other law, that they quote, unquote, contradict certain Hadith

their rulings contradict certain Hadith so many people get wonder,

Oh my god, the Prophet said something but the Imam said

something else. No, because the Imam has other evidences such as

multiple actions by many, many, many Sahaba. Okay, upon a matter,

so therefore, that hadith must be an exception, or it must have some

context, it must be limited, and it's not the norm. So in that

respect, people have to understand how single change and solitary

Hadith that come from just one or two sources that don't have any

context, how we accept them, we believe that they're from the

prophet but we don't have the context to apply them. Okay. And

that's lit literally limited to just the solitary narrations.

Now we go to the next section here, it says welcome agile hockey

molded by happy you