Shadee Elmasry – Bukhari Class #14 2of2

Do you need to go out, you know, defend the city or defend

something and you say, well, but what my kids and who's gonna take

care of them, and he's gonna do that. And, you know, so then you

become fearful. And it causes you to be a coward when there's

actually something more pressing more important that you need to go

and fulfill.

So in that sense, they can be a distraction. And your wealth can

be that too, right? You can say, well, I have these businesses, I

can't just go out and do these things. And who's gonna watch my

business for me, I can't go to Hajj who's gonna watch my business

for me, they'll steal, they'll do this. So even that sense source of

wealth where he has the means to go to Hajj, but he decides not to

because you can't trust anyway to watch over. Whether that's true or

not.

So that means that there are fitting in the sense that now your

heart becomes distracted from what's more important. So then the

sadaqa, and the soul and these things, they can be

a means by which to expiate that distraction of the heart.

It doesn't relieve you from doing things you have to do. So if you

never go to Hajj. And you just say, Well, you know, I prayed and

gave some silica that Oh, no, it doesn't activate it, because it's

considered a debt

in that regard, but if you know, you have this fitna of

destruction, so you're doing trying to fill those rights, but

nevertheless, you're distracted, then this, the regular acts of

piety are a means by which to to expiate that.

So

the next part of the Hadith, actually, it's not included in

every genres, commentary, but

has a historical precedent that maybe we'll I think we'll leave

till next time.

So we have a few minutes before

that will leave to question I think next week is our last week

shall the 22nd. So hopefully, we'll get a couple more we'll get

close to the 40 that we had originally planned for.

In Sharla.

Yes, good question.

Stan was sitting.

In even doughnuts commentary that you mentioned about the cable that

you just mentioned about those standards. As

I understand, it says to Dumas,

you change direction with it, so you can't face the Qibla Malim to

show cause havoc, assuming that your companions can keep up with

you. But if they can't, then you don't do that. You can just sit

down, and you don't have to change direction.

So only if you're physically able to do that you don't get seasick

and you can move with it, then that's what that's referring to.

That is all you meant.

Yeah, I'm just trying to figure out the context.

I just wasn't seeing it

doesn't say it explicitly. That's true. But it's understood the

doodle

that you know, you're moving with it to face

anyone else?

Permanently disability and you're unable to perform declared, and

it'll go constantly time, the longer

they could not be responsible for repairs. But is there any kind of

explanation for that that family member's

bill

there's no explanation for something that's not required of

you. Excavation only happens when there's something required of you

and either you don't do it right or you're Miss or something like

that. But if it's not required, because of some, you know, someone

who doesn't have the means to go to Hajj and never goes there's

nothing on them

performing physically meeting or mentally

just recite as much as I said, Are you going to do it?

They're not enough anymore. They're not.

They're not held responsible for that anymore if they don't have

the means by which to do it.

And unlike

Hodge, where people someone can do Hajj with someone else who didn't

go

to do prayers for someone else, because that's an individual

obligation that's connected with the person themselves, where

Hedge there's that element of you actually having the financial

means to do it. So you can do subtle clots charity in someone

else's name or hedge in someone else's name. But like you can't

fast for someone else, or pray for someone else to do their prayers

for them, because that's something that's, you know, has no

connection with, there's no Nieva there's no someone doing it on

your behalf because the nature of it itself, but you could do

something else, you know, if someone wants to establish a

sadhaka God or something like that, but it's not flat required,

because they're not they're not held responsible for that.

No, point in time when you weren't

in your prayers, like

would there be some kinds of

prayers or prayers that incorrectly or would you just be

like doing them over and no one was saying correctly means

incorrectly the extent where they were not valid, and that's, that's

a whole nother thing. But assuming that they that's not the case,

then one just works forward now on what they need to do ahead of

them. And I couldn't tell someone do all those over again. There

have been people who've kind of

after they've, they've made a repentance even though used to

pray they want to still do the ones over that's an individual

thing, but it's not something that's a ruling that can apply to

everybody. It's not necessary.

Yes, somebody can see the patch for the person who didn't do

whether he had means to perform the logic or whether he did not

have the means

to do the Hajj. So in the cases, somebody else can

sue me they've done their own already.

They've done their own fun times and then they can do it for

someone else.

named Zach Moloch one week left Shala so hopefully we'll get to

that next week and as last month on your channel

you talked with artists when I send them a new digital so when

you know aluminum can even withstand worse and when you

sneeze when you McCann well after that when and from that I would

add I mean Subhanallah we could represent the MLC when we said

Enron was anywhere from today.

Right

Right

Right

RIGHT.

RIGHT.

Right