Shadee Elmasry – 4 No Real Conflict Ash’aris

How does the how somebody, you mentioned two things, which I'm

curious about.

You first mentioned that it's not even correct to enter into this

conflict and try to refute that shadow. That's number one. And if

you can explain why that is. And number two, you said, even if we

did, it would end in two seconds. So could you explain both of those

points?

Let's start with the fourth have, we ended in two seconds.

Let's talk about the SR era. In particular, when I say VSI, in

particular, then I'm not addressing the Metro media for

instance.

Hanbury actually conflict. The problem basically is in the issue

of that we've detailed interpretation of Lhasa treatment

111 statement, this is part of

the discussion period, the discussion at all. But what you're

doing is hot or cold. And I'm Lady lighter. And to explain this,

you're not saying you are talking about the last panel data without

knowledge. And it doesn't mean knowledge means certainty, which

is the same thing that they say? And they say, No, we have setup.

And we are following something that

we have already established in our magazine.

So the 100, the traditional humbly approach is to say, we're not

accepting the narrations that you say about the setup period. And

we're not entering into this meeting. So we're not even sitting

at the table.

Yes, because the Hamdani position this this is something that we

learn in our books Iraqi, which is said which will sit by himself.

Now they allow,

we do not argue we do not have disputes we do not discuss when it

comes to the matters of attitude. And we explained that before this,

this method is really good. By the way, the rest of of not discussing

not having disputes, not having debates. This is a very good

method. We can talk about it later. This was the point about

why it ends in two seconds. And by the way, there is a sad part of

it. Okay, we accept your mishap. Then as of of the fleet, we accept

your method, and it's one of our two choices, then.

Why bother?

And that's why you're saying that

the idea of conflict with Russia IRA is also not Madhu P not

desirable.

That's why at some point in history, they decided that

although this is a matter that we do not accept the matter of it

that way, but in the end, you say It's haram. When you say haram,

when you say where do you when you say Mr. Have? What kind of ruling

is this? It's this is this is a 30 ruling. This is how we didn't say

this is Cuf or this is Fisk.

It's haram right? Yes. In the end, does it affect there are Kedah

know Yanni someone met doing this same good example

is if it is not affected, because it doesn't affect or harm the

issue of victim Z.

I say good