Shadee Elmasry – 3 On Ibn Taymiyya
![Shadee Elmasry](https://artwork.muslimcentral.com/shadee-elmasry-150x150.jpg)
AI: Summary ©
AI: Transcript ©
Now this was about
I think the question about the damy branch has to be Inaki damy
branch of the embodiments.
I think this is an easy discussion.
If you read his
short texts, if you read his answers, Ahmed rejected all the
LME
methods
or the method methods that rely on a milkman. This was his mother,
the mother of a self.
All the Hannibal, who follow the aikido argument held the same
position
the vast majority of chastely slum AMI, his books are full of Qlm.
How can this be a branch of the humble yaki?
If you want to say that, then we'll take anything in the Azure
era. They
supported and strengthened the RP the of self by logical proofs.
Let's agree on that. But the message itself is different.
From the Hambali message, the message itself is rejected and
prohibited by the Hanabi. I'm not here talking about differences
between Russia or China, we are talking about what somebody must
have as enacting
such an attitude
is not accepted in the harmony method. Let's stop at something
the checklist that Amy has said. He said,
I never
I will say it in Arabic and I will try to translate that over to her
million cup to the Mercedes effect that it was defending himself and
he was not debating he was answering many questions by
actually scholars at the time and to defend himself. He said, I
never opened
the discussion of Allah's attributes with laymen,
the HANA villa, the amount that they say in the rocker, it can be
set to anyone.
And even Taymiyah himself set
the aqidah of my ancestors from the HANA villa, this was in
the most authentic RV it happens, the man rejected
and he said the Aqeedah is not taken from Armand Hammer. The
heater is not taken from Ahmed and it's not taken from those who are
better than
because the IP that is a matter of his authority via TV.
He realized that
in Tamia himself doesn't agree on that part of a Hanbury brands
they need brands of the humble yaki I'm very happy that is the
hamburger
know.
So, then if that being the case, then can you explain how
it maintained me as works are filled with Kadem when the common
understanding is that
even a Tamia is waging war on Kedem. So, can you kindly explain
you know to us, how exactly
is it filled with Kadem methodology? Can you give examples
specific examples and general principles they may want to
refute? Yes, I wanted to refute the
car in order to refute the idea of people who rely on it or not.
And he studied the ways and he studied them as a very well
done discussion.
This this is the same position this the refutation of these APA
it might see the same position that hadn't been would hope.
Let's assume this
is correct.
I am humbled and now I want to refute the Sharia. Which is not
correct by the way. And we can we can talk about this later.
I am humbly and they won't refute the SRT. The discussion ends in
like two seconds.
This is not enough for
this. This wasn't enough to say the same thing. Jay said Damien
had a dispute with the ASHA
This has to be done in their way away. That guarantees a lot of a
lot of works. A lot of books, a lot of debates, maybe
everyday man
was the type of scholars who liked
explaining things, talking a lot.
That was the same thing that some of the Egyptian scholars said to
him when they met.
Or what some of the Egyptian scholars said about him, when they
were asked to debate with him that he
loved talking, explaining,
presenting his madhhab
because he had a lot of rain this was my opinion is what he had a
lot of rain, that he wanted to express all of that
it's there is no better way to refute someone's mishap
then using their own tool
and he didn't want the discussion to end in two seconds like that,
I'm very discussion with the HR.
So, is it accurate for me to understand here that it Tamia he
parted from the HANA beta in his methodology? But are his
conclusions this correct? Would you say that the conclusions are
the same?
I will talk about the
how the HANA Villa oh the HANA Villa after meeting me viewed
epitomes position in luckily
there was there was disagreement, and a lot of conflict between
Annabella, Usha
before me and after me. And after Potamia, the HANA villa.
They had always been a minority.
Saying that Potamia was not an Imam was not saying Islam was not
a scholar. This wasn't the humbly position.
But they also didn't agree on everything that he said, they
rejected a lot of his positions. And they have a way of doing this.
And they all agree on it in a very strange way, as if they have had
an agreement or something that we didn't know of, they always take
what suits them. And that occurred, which is the humbly
argument
and say, God simply saved me. so and so and so. And even Tamia had
the detail in this issue that that contradicts with the aqidah of
Allison algebra, and they would just omit this part. And they
would, they would continue. You see one of the greatest
not followers, but one of the one of the people who really
appreciated the Potamia suffering, he would do so to make parts of
epidemiology either and mentioned other parts that do not really
contradict with our archive.
And Bucha himself appreciated with a mean the booty
shake majority owners and booty in allowable mode.
He did that we'll have the C fat
man for himself Atilla Iran edict that we have this cifre and in, in
other books in the humble USA, he appreciated the detainee and he
called himself Islam and he defended
they wanted to coexist with safely Islam Damia rejecting the parts
that can never be in our mishap.
And this can be highlighted in a book called a Manhattan
feeder Ilma salability tune magnimous have been demanding.
It's basically based upon positions that contain yourself
and they were claimed to be humbled. In fact, in Africa and in
other things. And the author of the book was embellished called
Kurumi Hitomi said,
these are not from the embodiment of these issues are not from the
harmony method. They contradict with them, but
this is this is the this is the this is the climax
Before that,
they did what I explained they did what I
told you, they would just make parts of these athletes mentioned
other products
now, okay, so they coexisted. And they as I'm sure this happened
with many
people who are much dead filled with hope, and I'm sure that at
the very minimum Hannibal are considered even semi in which
they'd fit another hope that they would agree with some of his HD
heads and disagree with other of his HD heads. And so that that you
said then the bigger break in the Senate, so much so that you
mentioned some of the Senate being a clean Senate as opposed to
Muhammad Abdul Wahab Senate so that's where you would say there
is a bigger
break.
Yes. Okay.