Shadee Elmasry – 3 On Ibn Taymiyya

Now this was about

I think the question about the damy branch has to be Inaki damy

branch of the embodiments.

I think this is an easy discussion.

If you read his

short texts, if you read his answers, Ahmed rejected all the

LME

methods

or the method methods that rely on a milkman. This was his mother,

the mother of a self.

All the Hannibal, who follow the aikido argument held the same

position

the vast majority of chastely slum AMI, his books are full of Qlm.

How can this be a branch of the humble yaki?

If you want to say that, then we'll take anything in the Azure

era. They

supported and strengthened the RP the of self by logical proofs.

Let's agree on that. But the message itself is different.

From the Hambali message, the message itself is rejected and

prohibited by the Hanabi. I'm not here talking about differences

between Russia or China, we are talking about what somebody must

have as enacting

such an attitude

is not accepted in the harmony method. Let's stop at something

the checklist that Amy has said. He said,

I never

I will say it in Arabic and I will try to translate that over to her

million cup to the Mercedes effect that it was defending himself and

he was not debating he was answering many questions by

actually scholars at the time and to defend himself. He said, I

never opened

the discussion of Allah's attributes with laymen,

the HANA villa, the amount that they say in the rocker, it can be

set to anyone.

And even Taymiyah himself set

the aqidah of my ancestors from the HANA villa, this was in

the most authentic RV it happens, the man rejected

and he said the Aqeedah is not taken from Armand Hammer. The

heater is not taken from Ahmed and it's not taken from those who are

better than

because the IP that is a matter of his authority via TV.

He realized that

in Tamia himself doesn't agree on that part of a Hanbury brands

they need brands of the humble yaki I'm very happy that is the

hamburger

know.

So, then if that being the case, then can you explain how

it maintained me as works are filled with Kadem when the common

understanding is that

even a Tamia is waging war on Kedem. So, can you kindly explain

you know to us, how exactly

is it filled with Kadem methodology? Can you give examples

specific examples and general principles they may want to

refute? Yes, I wanted to refute the

car in order to refute the idea of people who rely on it or not.

And he studied the ways and he studied them as a very well

done discussion.

This this is the same position this the refutation of these APA

it might see the same position that hadn't been would hope.

Let's assume this

is correct.

I am humbled and now I want to refute the Sharia. Which is not

correct by the way. And we can we can talk about this later.

I am humbly and they won't refute the SRT. The discussion ends in

like two seconds.

This is not enough for

this. This wasn't enough to say the same thing. Jay said Damien

had a dispute with the ASHA

This has to be done in their way away. That guarantees a lot of a

lot of works. A lot of books, a lot of debates, maybe

everyday man

was the type of scholars who liked

explaining things, talking a lot.

That was the same thing that some of the Egyptian scholars said to

him when they met.

Or what some of the Egyptian scholars said about him, when they

were asked to debate with him that he

loved talking, explaining,

presenting his madhhab

because he had a lot of rain this was my opinion is what he had a

lot of rain, that he wanted to express all of that

it's there is no better way to refute someone's mishap

then using their own tool

and he didn't want the discussion to end in two seconds like that,

I'm very discussion with the HR.

So, is it accurate for me to understand here that it Tamia he

parted from the HANA beta in his methodology? But are his

conclusions this correct? Would you say that the conclusions are

the same?

I will talk about the

how the HANA Villa oh the HANA Villa after meeting me viewed

epitomes position in luckily

there was there was disagreement, and a lot of conflict between

Annabella, Usha

before me and after me. And after Potamia, the HANA villa.

They had always been a minority.

Saying that Potamia was not an Imam was not saying Islam was not

a scholar. This wasn't the humbly position.

But they also didn't agree on everything that he said, they

rejected a lot of his positions. And they have a way of doing this.

And they all agree on it in a very strange way, as if they have had

an agreement or something that we didn't know of, they always take

what suits them. And that occurred, which is the humbly

argument

and say, God simply saved me. so and so and so. And even Tamia had

the detail in this issue that that contradicts with the aqidah of

Allison algebra, and they would just omit this part. And they

would, they would continue. You see one of the greatest

not followers, but one of the one of the people who really

appreciated the Potamia suffering, he would do so to make parts of

epidemiology either and mentioned other parts that do not really

contradict with our archive.

And Bucha himself appreciated with a mean the booty

shake majority owners and booty in allowable mode.

He did that we'll have the C fat

man for himself Atilla Iran edict that we have this cifre and in, in

other books in the humble USA, he appreciated the detainee and he

called himself Islam and he defended

they wanted to coexist with safely Islam Damia rejecting the parts

that can never be in our mishap.

And this can be highlighted in a book called a Manhattan

feeder Ilma salability tune magnimous have been demanding.

It's basically based upon positions that contain yourself

and they were claimed to be humbled. In fact, in Africa and in

other things. And the author of the book was embellished called

Kurumi Hitomi said,

these are not from the embodiment of these issues are not from the

harmony method. They contradict with them, but

this is this is the this is the this is the climax

Before that,

they did what I explained they did what I

told you, they would just make parts of these athletes mentioned

other products

now, okay, so they coexisted. And they as I'm sure this happened

with many

people who are much dead filled with hope, and I'm sure that at

the very minimum Hannibal are considered even semi in which

they'd fit another hope that they would agree with some of his HD

heads and disagree with other of his HD heads. And so that that you

said then the bigger break in the Senate, so much so that you

mentioned some of the Senate being a clean Senate as opposed to

Muhammad Abdul Wahab Senate so that's where you would say there

is a bigger

break.

Yes. Okay.