Shadee Elmasry – 3 On Ibn Taymiyya

Shadee Elmasry
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The conversation covers various topics including the origin of the damy branch, the use of K bye, and the potential for a war. The speakers express frustration with the lack of clarity and discuss the potential for conflict. They also mention a book about a woman named Ilma salability tune magnimous and the Senate as a potential break.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:01 --> 00:00:03
			Now this was about
		
00:00:04 --> 00:00:09
			I think the question about the
damy branch has to be Inaki damy
		
00:00:09 --> 00:00:12
			branch of the embodiments.
		
00:00:14 --> 00:00:16
			I think this is an easy
discussion.
		
00:00:20 --> 00:00:22
			If you read his
		
00:00:24 --> 00:00:32
			short texts, if you read his
answers, Ahmed rejected all the
		
00:00:32 --> 00:00:33
			LME
		
00:00:35 --> 00:00:35
			methods
		
00:00:36 --> 00:00:43
			or the method methods that rely on
a milkman. This was his mother,
		
00:00:43 --> 00:00:45
			the mother of a self.
		
00:00:47 --> 00:00:52
			All the Hannibal, who follow the
aikido argument held the same
		
00:00:52 --> 00:00:53
			position
		
00:00:57 --> 00:01:02
			the vast majority of chastely slum
AMI, his books are full of Qlm.
		
00:01:04 --> 00:01:07
			How can this be a branch of the
humble yaki?
		
00:01:10 --> 00:01:15
			If you want to say that, then
we'll take anything in the Azure
		
00:01:15 --> 00:01:16
			era. They
		
00:01:18 --> 00:01:23
			supported and strengthened the RP
the of self by logical proofs.
		
00:01:24 --> 00:01:28
			Let's agree on that. But the
message itself is different.
		
00:01:29 --> 00:01:35
			From the Hambali message, the
message itself is rejected and
		
00:01:35 --> 00:01:40
			prohibited by the Hanabi. I'm not
here talking about differences
		
00:01:40 --> 00:01:44
			between Russia or China, we are
talking about what somebody must
		
00:01:44 --> 00:01:45
			have as enacting
		
00:01:47 --> 00:01:48
			such an attitude
		
00:01:50 --> 00:01:56
			is not accepted in the harmony
method. Let's stop at something
		
00:01:56 --> 00:01:58
			the checklist that Amy has said.
He said,
		
00:01:59 --> 00:02:00
			I never
		
00:02:01 --> 00:02:05
			I will say it in Arabic and I will
try to translate that over to her
		
00:02:05 --> 00:02:10
			million cup to the Mercedes effect
that it was defending himself and
		
00:02:10 --> 00:02:16
			he was not debating he was
answering many questions by
		
00:02:16 --> 00:02:19
			actually scholars at the time and
to defend himself. He said, I
		
00:02:19 --> 00:02:20
			never opened
		
00:02:21 --> 00:02:25
			the discussion of Allah's
attributes with laymen,
		
00:02:27 --> 00:02:31
			the HANA villa, the amount that
they say in the rocker, it can be
		
00:02:31 --> 00:02:32
			set to anyone.
		
00:02:35 --> 00:02:37
			And even Taymiyah himself set
		
00:02:38 --> 00:02:43
			the aqidah of my ancestors from
the HANA villa, this was in
		
00:02:44 --> 00:02:48
			the most authentic RV it happens,
the man rejected
		
00:02:49 --> 00:02:54
			and he said the Aqeedah is not
taken from Armand Hammer. The
		
00:02:54 --> 00:02:59
			heater is not taken from Ahmed and
it's not taken from those who are
		
00:02:59 --> 00:03:00
			better than
		
00:03:01 --> 00:03:04
			because the IP that is a matter of
his authority via TV.
		
00:03:06 --> 00:03:07
			He realized that
		
00:03:08 --> 00:03:13
			in Tamia himself doesn't agree on
that part of a Hanbury brands
		
00:03:14 --> 00:03:18
			they need brands of the humble
yaki I'm very happy that is the
		
00:03:18 --> 00:03:19
			hamburger
		
00:03:20 --> 00:03:21
			know.
		
00:03:22 --> 00:03:27
			So, then if that being the case,
then can you explain how
		
00:03:28 --> 00:03:31
			it maintained me as works are
filled with Kadem when the common
		
00:03:31 --> 00:03:33
			understanding is that
		
00:03:34 --> 00:03:39
			even a Tamia is waging war on
Kedem. So, can you kindly explain
		
00:03:39 --> 00:03:41
			you know to us, how exactly
		
00:03:42 --> 00:03:46
			is it filled with Kadem
methodology? Can you give examples
		
00:03:46 --> 00:03:50
			specific examples and general
principles they may want to
		
00:03:51 --> 00:03:56
			refute? Yes, I wanted to refute
the
		
00:03:57 --> 00:04:02
			car in order to refute the idea of
people who rely on it or not.
		
00:04:06 --> 00:04:10
			And he studied the ways and he
studied them as a very well
		
00:04:13 --> 00:04:14
			done discussion.
		
00:04:16 --> 00:04:21
			This this is the same position
this the refutation of these APA
		
00:04:21 --> 00:04:26
			it might see the same position
that hadn't been would hope.
		
00:04:28 --> 00:04:30
			Let's assume this
		
00:04:32 --> 00:04:33
			is correct.
		
00:04:34 --> 00:04:37
			I am humbled and now I want to
refute the Sharia. Which is not
		
00:04:37 --> 00:04:40
			correct by the way. And we can we
can talk about this later.
		
00:04:42 --> 00:04:45
			I am humbly and they won't refute
the SRT. The discussion ends in
		
00:04:45 --> 00:04:46
			like two seconds.
		
00:04:49 --> 00:04:51
			This is not enough for
		
00:04:53 --> 00:04:56
			this. This wasn't enough to say
the same thing. Jay said Damien
		
00:04:56 --> 00:04:59
			had a dispute with the ASHA
		
00:05:00 --> 00:05:05
			This has to be done in their way
away. That guarantees a lot of a
		
00:05:05 --> 00:05:11
			lot of works. A lot of books, a
lot of debates, maybe
		
00:05:13 --> 00:05:14
			everyday man
		
00:05:17 --> 00:05:21
			was the type of scholars who liked
		
00:05:23 --> 00:05:25
			explaining things, talking a lot.
		
00:05:28 --> 00:05:33
			That was the same thing that some
of the Egyptian scholars said to
		
00:05:33 --> 00:05:35
			him when they met.
		
00:05:37 --> 00:05:42
			Or what some of the Egyptian
scholars said about him, when they
		
00:05:42 --> 00:05:46
			were asked to debate with him that
he
		
00:05:47 --> 00:05:51
			loved talking, explaining,
		
00:05:53 --> 00:05:54
			presenting his madhhab
		
00:05:57 --> 00:06:01
			because he had a lot of rain this
was my opinion is what he had a
		
00:06:01 --> 00:06:04
			lot of rain, that he wanted to
express all of that
		
00:06:09 --> 00:06:13
			it's there is no better way to
refute someone's mishap
		
00:06:15 --> 00:06:17
			then using their own tool
		
00:06:21 --> 00:06:25
			and he didn't want the discussion
to end in two seconds like that,
		
00:06:25 --> 00:06:26
			I'm very discussion with the HR.
		
00:06:29 --> 00:06:33
			So, is it accurate for me to
understand here that it Tamia he
		
00:06:34 --> 00:06:38
			parted from the HANA beta in his
methodology? But are his
		
00:06:38 --> 00:06:42
			conclusions this correct? Would
you say that the conclusions are
		
00:06:42 --> 00:06:42
			the same?
		
00:06:45 --> 00:06:48
			I will talk about the
		
00:06:51 --> 00:06:55
			how the HANA Villa oh the HANA
Villa after meeting me viewed
		
00:06:56 --> 00:06:58
			epitomes position in luckily
		
00:07:02 --> 00:07:09
			there was there was disagreement,
and a lot of conflict between
		
00:07:09 --> 00:07:10
			Annabella, Usha
		
00:07:12 --> 00:07:17
			before me and after me. And after
Potamia, the HANA villa.
		
00:07:20 --> 00:07:22
			They had always been a minority.
		
00:07:25 --> 00:07:30
			Saying that Potamia was not an
Imam was not saying Islam was not
		
00:07:30 --> 00:07:33
			a scholar. This wasn't the humbly
position.
		
00:07:35 --> 00:07:39
			But they also didn't agree on
everything that he said, they
		
00:07:39 --> 00:07:43
			rejected a lot of his positions.
And they have a way of doing this.
		
00:07:43 --> 00:07:49
			And they all agree on it in a very
strange way, as if they have had
		
00:07:49 --> 00:07:54
			an agreement or something that we
didn't know of, they always take
		
00:07:54 --> 00:07:58
			what suits them. And that
occurred, which is the humbly
		
00:07:58 --> 00:07:59
			argument
		
00:08:00 --> 00:08:06
			and say, God simply saved me. so
and so and so. And even Tamia had
		
00:08:06 --> 00:08:10
			the detail in this issue that that
contradicts with the aqidah of
		
00:08:10 --> 00:08:13
			Allison algebra, and they would
just omit this part. And they
		
00:08:13 --> 00:08:18
			would, they would continue. You
see one of the greatest
		
00:08:20 --> 00:08:24
			not followers, but one of the one
of the people who really
		
00:08:24 --> 00:08:30
			appreciated the Potamia suffering,
he would do so to make parts of
		
00:08:30 --> 00:08:34
			epidemiology either and mentioned
other parts that do not really
		
00:08:35 --> 00:08:36
			contradict with our archive.
		
00:08:38 --> 00:08:42
			And Bucha himself appreciated with
a mean the booty
		
00:08:43 --> 00:08:47
			shake majority owners and booty in
allowable mode.
		
00:08:48 --> 00:08:53
			He did that we'll have the C fat
		
00:08:54 --> 00:08:59
			man for himself Atilla Iran edict
that we have this cifre and in, in
		
00:08:59 --> 00:09:03
			other books in the humble USA, he
appreciated the detainee and he
		
00:09:03 --> 00:09:06
			called himself Islam and he
defended
		
00:09:09 --> 00:09:15
			they wanted to coexist with safely
Islam Damia rejecting the parts
		
00:09:15 --> 00:09:18
			that can never be in our mishap.
		
00:09:19 --> 00:09:25
			And this can be highlighted in a
book called a Manhattan
		
00:09:26 --> 00:09:30
			feeder Ilma salability tune
magnimous have been demanding.
		
00:09:30 --> 00:09:34
			It's basically based upon
positions that contain yourself
		
00:09:35 --> 00:09:40
			and they were claimed to be
humbled. In fact, in Africa and in
		
00:09:40 --> 00:09:43
			other things. And the author of
the book was embellished called
		
00:09:44 --> 00:09:47
			Kurumi Hitomi said,
		
00:09:49 --> 00:09:52
			these are not from the embodiment
of these issues are not from the
		
00:09:52 --> 00:09:54
			harmony method. They contradict
with them, but
		
00:09:55 --> 00:09:59
			this is this is the this is the
this is the climax
		
00:10:01 --> 00:10:02
			Before that,
		
00:10:03 --> 00:10:06
			they did what I explained they did
what I
		
00:10:07 --> 00:10:11
			told you, they would just make
parts of these athletes mentioned
		
00:10:11 --> 00:10:12
			other products
		
00:10:13 --> 00:10:17
			now, okay, so they coexisted. And
they as I'm sure this happened
		
00:10:17 --> 00:10:18
			with many
		
00:10:19 --> 00:10:22
			people who are much dead filled
with hope, and I'm sure that at
		
00:10:22 --> 00:10:25
			the very minimum Hannibal are
considered even semi in which
		
00:10:25 --> 00:10:28
			they'd fit another hope that they
would agree with some of his HD
		
00:10:28 --> 00:10:32
			heads and disagree with other of
his HD heads. And so that that you
		
00:10:32 --> 00:10:37
			said then the bigger break in the
Senate, so much so that you
		
00:10:37 --> 00:10:41
			mentioned some of the Senate being
a clean Senate as opposed to
		
00:10:41 --> 00:10:44
			Muhammad Abdul Wahab Senate so
that's where you would say there
		
00:10:44 --> 00:10:45
			is a bigger
		
00:10:46 --> 00:10:47
			break.
		
00:10:49 --> 00:10:50
			Yes. Okay.