Shadee Elmasry – 13 Intentionally Breaking Fast
AI: Summary ©
The speaker discusses the concept of a "reefacing penalty" when someone tries to break into a fasting house. They explain that the penalty is related to the individual's intent and suggests that individuals should avoid interpretations of verse. The speaker also discusses the importance of eating and drinking to overcome the penalty.
AI: Summary ©
Fatah what is co founder co founder is essentially the
penalty.
And what is the
when do I have to pay this penalty when I make the intention to break
the fast? So let's say I'm fasting
and what do I need to break my fast? The intent? Intention is
sufficient to break the fast. Okay, that's all I need intense.
So if I intend to break the fast house, I'm not fasting anymore,
okay? Or let's say you're not fasting,
intentional eating, drinking, emission, sexual emission or
*,
far off interpretations and like an interpretation that's absurd or
ridiculous that someone eats in the middle of Ramadan says, What
are you doing? I said, I'm doing what Allah said. Allah says No,
put an eat and drink but do not but not to access. Of course,
that's a ridiculous and absurd tafseer or interpretation of that
verse. Because that versus general, the command to fast is
specific. And the specific always overrides the general. Right? What
do you put, when you have pots in your cabinet? Do you put the big
pot on the small pot, or the small pot inside the big pot? No, that
big, the small pot always goes on top of the big pot. So therefore,
the specific verses always override the general verses. So
eat and drink, but not to excess is a general commit. Now it comes
in the middle of Ramadan. So I'm obeying Allah, Allah says he
didn't drink but not to exist. So that's a foot we call two wheeled
diets are a far off interpretation. This person needs
to to make up their fast and they have a penalty, the kuffaar, which
we're going to explain right now, another far off interpretation.
And I actually saw this and I found it so absurd. I couldn't
believe it was what I was seeing.
It is said that if there's food in your mouth, and you're and the
event goes off, you may swallow it.
Allah does not expect us to spit the food out of our mouth when the
Adana federal urine showed right? There's food in your mouth that
then goes off, you don't spit it out, you've never seen a Muslim do
that, right? You swallow it.
That has been extrapolated now to you can finish whatever's in your
hand to you can finish whatever's in your plate. Now, that's
absolutely far off interpretation. There's no such ruling like that
there is only the ruling that Allah does not expect you to spit
anything out, you may swallow what's in your mouth, and you have
not broken your fast. But finishing what's in your hand. Now
it's extended to what's in your plate. I mean, that's very far off
and that will require the Kafala because no Muslim with any common
sense will accept that.
Muslims who were hungry and looking for an excuse, maybe they
accepted that but you know, we that's a good fun. So what is
kofod require three things number one tilba You have to make
repentance. Number two, you have to make up the day. Number three,
the choice of the following eating either feeding 60 Poor Muslims, or
fasting two consecutive months, either or you get the choice. Of
course mostly we would probably feed 60 Poor muscles, which is a
lot of money because that's
$10
times $6,600 per day. Okay, it's a it's a hefty penalty. It's not a
light penalty. It's like getting a really bad traffic ticket. Like
really bad like three tickets in one