Omar Usman – Decisive Deep Dive Introduction and Banana Bread

Omar Usman
AI: Summary ©
The speaker explains that Decisive is a story about making better decisions and acknowledging mistakes as a pattern. They emphasize the importance of understanding the mistake and starting from the beginning, rather than just profits. The speaker discusses issues with the food and pastry industries, including framing processes as should- opens a pastry shop, and emphasizes the need to mitigate and minimize the impact of cognitive bias, emotional bias, and short term emotion through understanding the role of people in opening stores.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:00 --> 00:00:03

In this video series, I'm going to be

00:00:03 --> 00:00:05

explaining the main points made in the book

00:00:05 --> 00:00:08

Decisive by Chip and Dan Heath. Now, normally,

00:00:08 --> 00:00:10

I share 3 lessons that I learn from

00:00:10 --> 00:00:12

books that I'm reading. In this series, I'll

00:00:12 --> 00:00:13

be doing something a little bit differently. This

00:00:13 --> 00:00:15

will be more of a deep dive. And

00:00:15 --> 00:00:16

so this video series,

00:00:16 --> 00:00:18

I'll be covering the major points made throughout

00:00:18 --> 00:00:21

the book, and accompanying it is a long

00:00:21 --> 00:00:23

write up, which I've linked to in the

00:00:23 --> 00:00:24

description down below.

00:00:25 --> 00:00:26

And that write up has a number of

00:00:26 --> 00:00:28

resources. So it has

00:00:28 --> 00:00:30

PDFs made available by the authors, it's got

00:00:30 --> 00:00:32

videos, podcasts interviews by the authors, things of

00:00:32 --> 00:00:35

that nature, but I've also written out a

00:00:35 --> 00:00:37

summary of the main points and also given

00:00:37 --> 00:00:40

additional resources beyond that so you can go

00:00:40 --> 00:00:42

to learn about these concepts more in detail.

00:00:42 --> 00:00:43

Detail. So it helps to go through that

00:00:43 --> 00:00:45

written guide along with these videos.

00:00:46 --> 00:00:48

Now, Decisive is a book about basically how

00:00:48 --> 00:00:50

to make better decisions. That doesn't sound like

00:00:50 --> 00:00:52

a whole lot, but decision making,

00:00:53 --> 00:00:55

if not, it's perhaps the most important skill

00:00:55 --> 00:00:57

that any leader can have, but it's also

00:00:57 --> 00:00:58

a very underrated

00:00:58 --> 00:01:01

skill. See, decisions shape the trajectory of an

00:01:01 --> 00:01:01

organization.

00:01:02 --> 00:01:03

So if you make the right decision, obviously,

00:01:03 --> 00:01:05

you go down the right path. If you

00:01:05 --> 00:01:06

make a wrong decision, it might take a

00:01:06 --> 00:01:07

long time to recover.

00:01:08 --> 00:01:10

Now the mistakes that most people fall into

00:01:10 --> 00:01:12

is they're either unable to make a decision,

00:01:13 --> 00:01:15

and so they wanna build consensus, they wanna

00:01:15 --> 00:01:16

take a long time, they wanna think about

00:01:16 --> 00:01:18

it, in which case sometimes you lose the

00:01:18 --> 00:01:20

opportunity cost of that decision,

00:01:21 --> 00:01:21

or

00:01:22 --> 00:01:24

they'll give into their emotions and short term

00:01:24 --> 00:01:26

biases. Think about buying a house and how

00:01:26 --> 00:01:28

emotion takes over. Now in this video,

00:01:29 --> 00:01:30

I'm gonna be sharing a story

00:01:30 --> 00:01:32

that the authors of the book sent out

00:01:32 --> 00:01:34

on their email newsletters. It's actually a story

00:01:34 --> 00:01:36

that was left on the cutting room floor.

00:01:36 --> 00:01:38

It didn't make it into the book, but

00:01:38 --> 00:01:40

for me, this story really encapsulates

00:01:40 --> 00:01:42

a lot of the major ideas that are

00:01:42 --> 00:01:44

made that are presented in the book, and

00:01:44 --> 00:01:46

the story goes like this. Let's pretend that

00:01:46 --> 00:01:48

there's a couple called Jim and Pam, and

00:01:48 --> 00:01:51

Jim works in the office, and Pam, she

00:01:51 --> 00:01:53

sends pastries along with Jim to work, you

00:01:53 --> 00:01:55

know, a couple of times a week, and

00:01:55 --> 00:01:57

Pam makes all types of things. She makes

00:01:57 --> 00:02:00

pumpkin bread, banana bread, scones, you know, muffins,

00:02:00 --> 00:02:01

all different types of pastries.

00:02:02 --> 00:02:03

The problem

00:02:03 --> 00:02:05

is, those pastries are low fat and they

00:02:05 --> 00:02:07

taste really bad.

00:02:07 --> 00:02:09

But when Jim comes to work, he puts

00:02:09 --> 00:02:11

the pastries out, and if you've ever been

00:02:11 --> 00:02:13

in an office environment, you know exactly how

00:02:13 --> 00:02:15

it works. There's free food in the bake

00:02:15 --> 00:02:18

in the break room, the email notification goes

00:02:18 --> 00:02:20

out, and everyone gets up. It's an excuse

00:02:20 --> 00:02:21

to get up. It's an excuse to take

00:02:21 --> 00:02:23

a break to see people and obviously to

00:02:23 --> 00:02:26

get some free food. And so the food

00:02:26 --> 00:02:29

disappears within a matter of minutes. Pretty soon,

00:02:29 --> 00:02:32

everyone knows that Jim's wife Pam sends pastries

00:02:32 --> 00:02:34

with him. And so now when they meet

00:02:34 --> 00:02:36

her at a social event for the company

00:02:36 --> 00:02:37

or at a dinner,

00:02:37 --> 00:02:39

in order to be polite, in order to

00:02:39 --> 00:02:41

establish rapport with her, they say, hey Pam,

00:02:42 --> 00:02:44

We love those pastries. Keep them coming. They

00:02:44 --> 00:02:46

taste great. Everyone finishes them very quickly.

00:02:47 --> 00:02:49

And so now after this happens a few

00:02:49 --> 00:02:51

times, Jim and Pam go home and they're

00:02:51 --> 00:02:53

thinking, hey, are we on to something? Are

00:02:53 --> 00:02:54

we sitting on a gold mine? You know,

00:02:54 --> 00:02:55

and Pam's saying, you know, I'm one of

00:02:55 --> 00:02:58

those Masterchef Junior kids and it's always been

00:02:58 --> 00:03:00

my dream to own a pastry shop and,

00:03:00 --> 00:03:02

you know, maybe we're really onto something. Maybe

00:03:02 --> 00:03:03

we should start a business. Maybe we should

00:03:03 --> 00:03:05

quit our jobs and go all in. And

00:03:05 --> 00:03:07

so Jim starts telling people about this idea

00:03:07 --> 00:03:09

that, hey, we might start a pastry business.

00:03:10 --> 00:03:11

And now people are kinda like, oh, okay.

00:03:11 --> 00:03:13

That's nice. Good luck. We wish you the

00:03:13 --> 00:03:13

best.

00:03:14 --> 00:03:16

But no one's gonna stop and say, hey,

00:03:16 --> 00:03:18

Jim. You can't do that.

00:03:18 --> 00:03:21

Those pastries, they taste like cardboard. They're stale.

00:03:21 --> 00:03:22

They taste terrible.

00:03:22 --> 00:03:25

No one's gonna say that. And so now,

00:03:25 --> 00:03:27

Jim and Pam, based on this information that,

00:03:27 --> 00:03:28

hey. Everyone thinks it's a good idea. Everything

00:03:29 --> 00:03:31

everyone thinks that we should do it. Well,

00:03:31 --> 00:03:33

now they start going down that path. Now

00:03:33 --> 00:03:35

immediately, a number of things that are really

00:03:35 --> 00:03:37

obvious jump out at us. Right? We're all

00:03:37 --> 00:03:39

screaming at at them saying no, don't do

00:03:39 --> 00:03:41

this. Now let's look at a couple of

00:03:41 --> 00:03:43

these mistakes in detail. Some are less obvious

00:03:43 --> 00:03:44

than the others.

00:03:45 --> 00:03:47

The first is that they're taking

00:03:48 --> 00:03:48

the particulars

00:03:49 --> 00:03:52

and the vividness of the immediate feedback and

00:03:52 --> 00:03:55

making a broad application of it. So they're

00:03:55 --> 00:03:56

seeing this feedback that, hey,

00:03:57 --> 00:03:59

everyone likes their pastries and they always finish

00:03:59 --> 00:04:01

out, and so they take that to mean

00:04:01 --> 00:04:02

that my pastries must be amazing.

00:04:03 --> 00:04:05

But if they were to zoom out and

00:04:05 --> 00:04:06

look at the bigger picture,

00:04:06 --> 00:04:08

they would see, well, actually,

00:04:09 --> 00:04:11

there's a pattern here. Anytime that there's free

00:04:11 --> 00:04:14

food in the office, it finishes out. It

00:04:14 --> 00:04:15

doesn't matter if it tastes bad, it doesn't

00:04:15 --> 00:04:17

matter if it's stale, it doesn't matter if

00:04:17 --> 00:04:18

it tastes disgusting.

00:04:19 --> 00:04:21

Anytime there's free food in the break room,

00:04:21 --> 00:04:23

it finishes. So they don't see themselves as

00:04:23 --> 00:04:24

part of that pattern,

00:04:24 --> 00:04:27

they see this feedback as validating, well, my

00:04:27 --> 00:04:28

pastries are amazing.

00:04:29 --> 00:04:30

The other thing that they failed to do

00:04:30 --> 00:04:34

was to actually validate and get feedback. And

00:04:34 --> 00:04:35

so it's one thing for people to say

00:04:35 --> 00:04:37

hey, those taste great. It may have been

00:04:37 --> 00:04:39

another thing to come and say okay, we're

00:04:39 --> 00:04:42

selling these for $2 each. And now they

00:04:42 --> 00:04:44

can do a little bit of market research

00:04:44 --> 00:04:45

and just validate.

00:04:45 --> 00:04:48

Are people actually buying it? Is the market

00:04:48 --> 00:04:50

reacting the way that we thought that it

00:04:50 --> 00:04:51

would? If it is, then maybe we can

00:04:51 --> 00:04:53

take a step further, but if not, we

00:04:53 --> 00:04:55

need to go back to the drawing board.

00:04:55 --> 00:04:57

Another thing that they failed to do was

00:04:57 --> 00:04:59

to understand their role, you know, understand what

00:04:59 --> 00:05:00

their true

00:05:00 --> 00:05:02

question or their true issue.

00:05:02 --> 00:05:04

They're framing this as a should we open

00:05:04 --> 00:05:07

a pastry shop or not, and if my

00:05:07 --> 00:05:08

pastries are good, then I should do a

00:05:08 --> 00:05:10

good job, but what they failed to do

00:05:10 --> 00:05:12

was to understand okay, how many people have

00:05:12 --> 00:05:13

made the jump

00:05:14 --> 00:05:14

from,

00:05:15 --> 00:05:17

maybe a passion project into a full time

00:05:17 --> 00:05:19

business, and what steps did it take to

00:05:19 --> 00:05:20

get there? If we do open a small

00:05:20 --> 00:05:22

business, what are the things that we're not

00:05:22 --> 00:05:25

taking into account? How many restaurants for example

00:05:25 --> 00:05:27

open up in a good location but fail?

00:05:27 --> 00:05:29

Do we know how to scout a commercial

00:05:29 --> 00:05:31

location? Do we know the legalities involved with

00:05:31 --> 00:05:33

it? Do we know how much the rent

00:05:33 --> 00:05:35

should be? And once we even do all

00:05:35 --> 00:05:37

that, have we really understood the food business?

00:05:37 --> 00:05:39

Do we know how much inventory is going

00:05:39 --> 00:05:41

to cost? Do we know how much equipment

00:05:41 --> 00:05:43

is going to cost? Do we know how

00:05:43 --> 00:05:44

much payroll and overhead is going to be

00:05:44 --> 00:05:46

and how to calculate all that? Do we

00:05:46 --> 00:05:48

know what our food margins need to be

00:05:48 --> 00:05:50

in order to turn a profit? Do we

00:05:50 --> 00:05:51

know how long we're supposed to wait before

00:05:51 --> 00:05:54

we turn a profit? There's a whole number

00:05:54 --> 00:05:55

of issues that they might not be taking

00:05:55 --> 00:05:58

into account because hey, my pastries are good,

00:05:58 --> 00:06:00

this is what I've dreamt about,

00:06:00 --> 00:06:02

and that's just what I wanna do.

00:06:03 --> 00:06:05

One thing that they could do, and I'm

00:06:05 --> 00:06:05

not saying that

00:06:06 --> 00:06:07

one thing that might happen is we'll say

00:06:07 --> 00:06:09

well okay we look at all this feedback

00:06:09 --> 00:06:10

and say okay well maybe we should stop,

00:06:10 --> 00:06:12

maybe we should pull back, and it's always

00:06:12 --> 00:06:14

kind of one extreme or the other that

00:06:14 --> 00:06:16

either we look at all these issues and

00:06:16 --> 00:06:18

say okay well forget it, that's too much

00:06:18 --> 00:06:20

to figure out, or we wanna go all

00:06:20 --> 00:06:22

in. And one of the things that happens

00:06:22 --> 00:06:24

is that it's kind of the narrative and

00:06:24 --> 00:06:26

the stories that we share particularly in modern

00:06:26 --> 00:06:29

times, and so we always popularize that story

00:06:29 --> 00:06:31

of the person that had that dream since

00:06:31 --> 00:06:33

they were a child of opening a pastry

00:06:33 --> 00:06:35

shop, and they put all their savings into

00:06:35 --> 00:06:37

it, they maxed out their credit cards, they

00:06:37 --> 00:06:39

took out their loans, and they made it.

00:06:39 --> 00:06:41

They followed their dreams, they followed their passion,

00:06:41 --> 00:06:43

they did all that, and we hear those

00:06:43 --> 00:06:44

stories and we think, well, we can do

00:06:44 --> 00:06:47

it too. But we don't seek out

00:06:47 --> 00:06:48

disconfirming

00:06:48 --> 00:06:51

information and that's a huge problem, especially the

00:06:51 --> 00:06:53

time of the internet where we only highlight

00:06:53 --> 00:06:56

success stories. Have we sought out the stories

00:06:56 --> 00:06:58

of the people that went down that same

00:06:58 --> 00:07:00

path but then ended up bankrupt, that failed

00:07:00 --> 00:07:01

that didn't make it,

00:07:02 --> 00:07:04

those aren't fun stories to share, but they

00:07:04 --> 00:07:06

have very relevant lessons

00:07:06 --> 00:07:09

that would be very pertinent in making this

00:07:09 --> 00:07:09

decision.

00:07:10 --> 00:07:12

Well now, okay, so are we supposed to

00:07:12 --> 00:07:14

go all in? Do we go all out?

00:07:14 --> 00:07:15

How do we figure that out?

00:07:15 --> 00:07:17

And that's where you have to have another

00:07:17 --> 00:07:19

element which is to say okay, let's set

00:07:19 --> 00:07:21

a trip wire, and that we will cover

00:07:21 --> 00:07:23

that in a later video in more detail,

00:07:23 --> 00:07:25

but basically let's set an experiment for ourselves.

00:07:26 --> 00:07:28

How much money can we reasonably invest? So

00:07:28 --> 00:07:30

they could have asked themselves, okay, what can

00:07:30 --> 00:07:33

we put in that's not gonna negatively impact

00:07:33 --> 00:07:35

us too much? So they might say, okay,

00:07:35 --> 00:07:36

we can put in $25100

00:07:36 --> 00:07:38

and it's not gonna negatively impact our lives

00:07:38 --> 00:07:40

if we lose all of it.

00:07:40 --> 00:07:42

Now let's based on our projections figure out

00:07:42 --> 00:07:44

how long it might take to break even

00:07:44 --> 00:07:45

or turn a profit. And they say, okay.

00:07:46 --> 00:07:47

Based on what we've done so far, we

00:07:47 --> 00:07:49

think that if we put in $25100

00:07:50 --> 00:07:52

into let's say buying, upgrading our equipment, getting

00:07:52 --> 00:07:55

some additional food supplies, doing some marketing, doing

00:07:55 --> 00:07:57

all these different things, then we should be

00:07:57 --> 00:07:59

able to turn a profit within 6 to

00:07:59 --> 00:08:01

8 months. And so they say okay, let's

00:08:01 --> 00:08:02

give ourselves leeway.

00:08:02 --> 00:08:04

Let's set a reminder on our calendar to

00:08:04 --> 00:08:07

come back after 8 months and see. If

00:08:07 --> 00:08:10

after 8 months we have made back $25100.1,

00:08:12 --> 00:08:14

for us that'll be a successful validation

00:08:15 --> 00:08:16

that we need to put a little bit

00:08:16 --> 00:08:18

more fuel into this, turn up the volume

00:08:18 --> 00:08:20

a little bit, and see how much more

00:08:20 --> 00:08:23

we can accelerate it. But if after 8

00:08:23 --> 00:08:25

months we come back and we've only made

00:08:25 --> 00:08:26

back $2,499.99,

00:08:30 --> 00:08:32

then that will be an indicator to us

00:08:32 --> 00:08:33

that we need to pull the plug on

00:08:33 --> 00:08:34

this project

00:08:34 --> 00:08:36

and not put any more money into it

00:08:36 --> 00:08:39

because we're probably going to lose it based

00:08:39 --> 00:08:41

on what we validated thus far. Now, in

00:08:41 --> 00:08:43

the upcoming videos, I'm going to explain the

00:08:43 --> 00:08:45

RAP framework, and the RAP framework

00:08:45 --> 00:08:46

is a system.

00:08:47 --> 00:08:49

It's a way of trying to mitigate

00:08:49 --> 00:08:52

and minimize the impact of cognitive bias, of

00:08:52 --> 00:08:55

emotional bias, of short term emotion, of all

00:08:55 --> 00:08:58

these different things, and that framework is W

00:08:58 --> 00:09:00

R A P, widen your options,

00:09:00 --> 00:09:02

reality test your assumptions,

00:09:02 --> 00:09:04

attain distance before deciding,

00:09:05 --> 00:09:07

and prepare to be wrong. And So we'll

00:09:07 --> 00:09:08

be going through each one of those in

00:09:08 --> 00:09:10

the next 4 videos. Again, make sure you

00:09:10 --> 00:09:13

check out the deep dive post that's accompanying

00:09:13 --> 00:09:15

these videos, and I'll see you in the

00:09:15 --> 00:09:16

next one. Thanks.

Share Page