Naima B. Robert – Muslims, Marriage and Lots and Lots of Children! TMC E.8 Mu’awiyyah Tucker

Naima B. Robert
AI: Summary ©
The speakers discuss the importance of finding a better marriage and finding a good character for a healthy and productive relationship. They stress the importance of personal growth, finding a better mother, finding a good career, and building a successful home. They also discuss the importance of finding a marriage that is both healthy and productive, and how it can be a choice between good and bad character. The speakers stress the importance of personal growth and finding a good partner, and provide examples of how women can be a victim of bad behavior. They also touch on the concept of "hasn't been met" and how it can lead to a "hasn't been met" situation.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:09 --> 00:00:10

Brother,

00:00:11 --> 00:00:13

welcome. Welcome to the show. Thanks for having

00:00:13 --> 00:00:14

me. Thanks.

00:00:14 --> 00:00:15

It's a pleasure to be here by the

00:00:15 --> 00:00:17

end of the show. Yeah. It's good to

00:00:17 --> 00:00:20

be able to talk inshallah. I'm really excited,

00:00:20 --> 00:00:23

about addressing what we're going to address today

00:00:23 --> 00:00:23

because

00:00:24 --> 00:00:24

you

00:00:25 --> 00:00:28

did a cheeky little Instagram survey, didn't you?

00:00:28 --> 00:00:30

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Addressing

00:00:31 --> 00:00:33

what sisters are looking for, what brothers are

00:00:33 --> 00:00:35

looking for. And let's call it what it

00:00:35 --> 00:00:38

is, what men want and what women want.

00:00:38 --> 00:00:41

Okay? Yeah. So tell us a little bit

00:00:41 --> 00:00:43

about why you decided to embark on that

00:00:43 --> 00:00:44

survey.

00:00:44 --> 00:00:45

Yeah. So interesting.

00:00:47 --> 00:00:48

Ironically,

00:00:48 --> 00:00:49

it was

00:00:51 --> 00:00:53

partly due to some of the content I

00:00:53 --> 00:00:54

was I was,

00:00:55 --> 00:00:58

consuming at the time, specifically as it relates

00:00:58 --> 00:00:58

to,

00:00:59 --> 00:01:01

what some people call today as, like, Red

00:01:01 --> 00:01:04

Pill or MagTel or whatnot. And, also, I

00:01:04 --> 00:01:05

guess I guess, social,

00:01:07 --> 00:01:09

discussions have been in in the in the

00:01:09 --> 00:01:09

space.

00:01:10 --> 00:01:12

And, also, it was a byproduct

00:01:12 --> 00:01:12

from,

00:01:15 --> 00:01:16

when we did a matrimonial,

00:01:17 --> 00:01:19

program. So in the past, we they have

00:01:19 --> 00:01:21

done a matrimonial program where we try to

00:01:21 --> 00:01:22

match people up, and we try to take

00:01:22 --> 00:01:24

a different approach in terms of how to

00:01:24 --> 00:01:26

get people married. So we the first thing

00:01:26 --> 00:01:28

we tried to do uniquely was to,

00:01:29 --> 00:01:30

bypass the whole

00:01:31 --> 00:01:33

profile thing. So rather than people putting profiles

00:01:33 --> 00:01:35

and having a long list of things, what

00:01:35 --> 00:01:36

they do and what don't do, what they

00:01:36 --> 00:01:38

like or don't like, We wanted a simple

00:01:38 --> 00:01:41

profile, simple simple as in hardly anything on

00:01:41 --> 00:01:43

it, and we want people to actually engage

00:01:43 --> 00:01:45

with each other directly. So the idea was

00:01:45 --> 00:01:48

put aside all of the things that you

00:01:48 --> 00:01:50

that you think you want and just talk

00:01:50 --> 00:01:51

to the person.

00:01:52 --> 00:01:54

Because often we found that what people have,

00:01:55 --> 00:01:56

basically, they they put aside

00:01:56 --> 00:01:58

a lot of options

00:01:58 --> 00:01:59

Yeah.

00:01:59 --> 00:02:00

Due to

00:02:00 --> 00:02:02

a vision of what they want, whereby most

00:02:02 --> 00:02:04

of what they want is not really that

00:02:04 --> 00:02:04

important

00:02:05 --> 00:02:06

in the in the grand scheme of things.

00:02:07 --> 00:02:08

And even not important to them as in

00:02:08 --> 00:02:09

they think it's important,

00:02:10 --> 00:02:12

but isn't really important to them. Yeah.

00:02:13 --> 00:02:15

So it was all these things put together,

00:02:15 --> 00:02:16

and I figured, you know what? Rather than

00:02:16 --> 00:02:17

people say

00:02:18 --> 00:02:19

or rather than me just consuming content and

00:02:19 --> 00:02:21

and hear what other people say people want,

00:02:21 --> 00:02:24

let me just ask the people what they

00:02:24 --> 00:02:24

want.

00:02:25 --> 00:02:26

And that was kind of what what I

00:02:26 --> 00:02:27

did in the the Instagram post. So I

00:02:27 --> 00:02:28

asked to see the questions.

00:02:29 --> 00:02:30

I got the answers,

00:02:30 --> 00:02:32

and then I tried to demonstrate or show

00:02:32 --> 00:02:33

from the answers,

00:02:34 --> 00:02:36

my point I was trying to make at

00:02:36 --> 00:02:37

the time. So that was that was the

00:02:37 --> 00:02:39

reason behind the the Instagram post.

00:02:40 --> 00:02:41

And then I made it into, like, a

00:02:41 --> 00:02:42

little continuous story thing.

00:02:44 --> 00:02:46

And we'll definitely link to your Instagram below

00:02:46 --> 00:02:48

this video, guys. You need to check out

00:02:48 --> 00:02:51

these answers. It's very, very eye opening.

00:02:51 --> 00:02:53

And I think your approach

00:02:55 --> 00:02:57

to allowing people to discover each other, I

00:02:57 --> 00:02:58

guess,

00:02:58 --> 00:03:00

without the sort of the pre qualifiers.

00:03:01 --> 00:03:03

Must have been a very interesting journey for

00:03:03 --> 00:03:05

for people and for you. What did you

00:03:05 --> 00:03:07

observe? Did were people did they perform better

00:03:07 --> 00:03:08

under those circumstances?

00:03:09 --> 00:03:10

Was it was it hard for people to

00:03:10 --> 00:03:13

kind of put aside the list and just

00:03:13 --> 00:03:15

engage with the person? What what how did

00:03:15 --> 00:03:15

that go?

00:03:16 --> 00:03:18

In in the marriage processing, you mean? Yeah.

00:03:18 --> 00:03:19

Yeah. So, I mean I mean, just to

00:03:19 --> 00:03:21

give you one example, the very first event

00:03:21 --> 00:03:23

we held, this is a few years back

00:03:23 --> 00:03:23

now,

00:03:24 --> 00:03:26

there was one brother who found a sister

00:03:26 --> 00:03:27

at the event

00:03:27 --> 00:03:29

and was very happy. He was happy. She

00:03:29 --> 00:03:31

was happy. Fabulous was happy. Everyone was happy.

00:03:31 --> 00:03:32

But then he approached me and said, brother,

00:03:32 --> 00:03:34

I have a concern. So what's the

00:03:34 --> 00:03:37

issue? So the every she ticks every box,

00:03:37 --> 00:03:39

but I have one issue. I said, what's

00:03:39 --> 00:03:39

the issue?

00:03:40 --> 00:03:41

She's a bit short.

00:03:42 --> 00:03:44

I said, bro, is that is it is

00:03:44 --> 00:03:45

it is it really that important?

00:03:46 --> 00:03:47

Said, no. It's not in it's just it's

00:03:47 --> 00:03:49

just I mean, I'm I'm a lot smarter

00:03:49 --> 00:03:51

than It's just a thing in it.

00:03:51 --> 00:03:53

Yeah. So I said, okay. Well, look, bruv.

00:03:53 --> 00:03:55

To be honest Oh. In the grand scheme

00:03:55 --> 00:03:56

of things, the

00:03:57 --> 00:03:59

if if you had children with her and

00:03:59 --> 00:04:00

she was looking after your children, would do

00:04:00 --> 00:04:02

you reckon she'd be a good mother? Yeah.

00:04:02 --> 00:04:04

Do you reckon are you happy with her,

00:04:04 --> 00:04:06

Dean? Yeah. Do you reckon that you can

00:04:06 --> 00:04:07

actually get along,

00:04:07 --> 00:04:09

on a personal level? Yeah. But what more

00:04:09 --> 00:04:10

do you want, brother?

00:04:11 --> 00:04:13

I said Wow. Yeah. I said I said,

00:04:13 --> 00:04:14

realistically,

00:04:15 --> 00:04:17

over a a in a year or 2,

00:04:17 --> 00:04:18

would this issue be a issue for you

00:04:18 --> 00:04:20

anymore? And do do you really think of

00:04:20 --> 00:04:21

an issue in a year or 2 time?

00:04:21 --> 00:04:24

And you thought by 4 probably not. As

00:04:24 --> 00:04:26

a problem, so you're literally turning down what's

00:04:26 --> 00:04:28

in your hand for the potential of finding

00:04:28 --> 00:04:30

someone that is just a tad bit taller.

00:04:31 --> 00:04:33

And so he took that advice. Took it.

00:04:33 --> 00:04:36

Took the advice and got married. And Farazanullah

00:04:36 --> 00:04:37

is still married to this day.

00:04:39 --> 00:04:42

That that that what you just mentioned there,

00:04:42 --> 00:04:44

turning away something that's in your hand

00:04:45 --> 00:04:47

for the hope that there's a potential that

00:04:47 --> 00:04:49

is just a bit more perfect than this

00:04:49 --> 00:04:52

one. I think it's, it's, we're all suffering

00:04:52 --> 00:04:54

from that as a culture, it feels. It's

00:04:54 --> 00:04:57

like there's always something better to be had.

00:04:57 --> 00:04:59

There's there's someone better. There's a better job.

00:04:59 --> 00:05:01

There's a better career. There's a better house.

00:05:01 --> 00:05:05

There's just better somewhere, and we all believe

00:05:05 --> 00:05:06

that we deserve

00:05:06 --> 00:05:08

better as well.

00:05:09 --> 00:05:11

The deserve part, maybe. Maybe. Because I I

00:05:11 --> 00:05:13

don't necessarily it's not not everyone has that

00:05:13 --> 00:05:16

Not everyone. View about themselves. Yeah. Yeah. But

00:05:16 --> 00:05:17

I do think

00:05:17 --> 00:05:19

I do think people think they have enough

00:05:19 --> 00:05:19

time.

00:05:20 --> 00:05:21

Mhmm.

00:05:22 --> 00:05:23

As in they they think, okay. As in

00:05:23 --> 00:05:25

we already have this idea that people get

00:05:25 --> 00:05:26

married

00:05:26 --> 00:05:29

maybe 25, maybe 30. We already have that

00:05:29 --> 00:05:31

that that idea as in that's a normal

00:05:31 --> 00:05:33

age or an okay age to get married

00:05:33 --> 00:05:33

whereas, realistically,

00:05:34 --> 00:05:36

25 is too late in my view. Wow.

00:05:38 --> 00:05:40

So if you if you view that look.

00:05:40 --> 00:05:42

Marriage is not not necessarily something you should

00:05:42 --> 00:05:44

delay if that's what you wanna do. Get

00:05:44 --> 00:05:46

married. Yeah. So if you can do it,

00:05:46 --> 00:05:47

then do it.

00:05:47 --> 00:05:49

You're better off,

00:05:49 --> 00:05:50

in the long run on on the on

00:05:50 --> 00:05:51

balance of probability.

00:05:52 --> 00:05:54

Then if you have the urgency in yourself,

00:05:54 --> 00:05:56

then you you you would overlook these things.

00:05:56 --> 00:05:58

Like, people tend to do once they hit

00:05:58 --> 00:06:00

their hit their thirties. When they hit their

00:06:00 --> 00:06:00

thirties,

00:06:01 --> 00:06:02

then they overlook things.

00:06:02 --> 00:06:05

And another sad case not sad case. Another

00:06:05 --> 00:06:07

another case we had in that thing,

00:06:07 --> 00:06:09

there's one sister who came.

00:06:09 --> 00:06:11

She was about 40

00:06:11 --> 00:06:13

something. I don't know. It was 40 something.

00:06:13 --> 00:06:14

46, I think. I'm not sure if it

00:06:14 --> 00:06:15

was 46.

00:06:16 --> 00:06:17

And she said, oh, bravo. I'm looking for

00:06:17 --> 00:06:18

us. And I said, okay. Cool. Let's let's

00:06:19 --> 00:06:21

what what what exactly are you looking for?

00:06:21 --> 00:06:23

He said, anyone. Just I said I said,

00:06:23 --> 00:06:24

yeah. I know, Bob. Do you have any

00:06:24 --> 00:06:28

preferences? No. Just just a man. You know?

00:06:28 --> 00:06:29

Just anyone.

00:06:29 --> 00:06:30

And,

00:06:31 --> 00:06:32

and I I tried I tried to mess

00:06:32 --> 00:06:34

it up. Would you prefer a particular age?

00:06:34 --> 00:06:36

But she said, look. Do Do you have

00:06:36 --> 00:06:39

anyone available? Stop digging. Okay? Just give me

00:06:39 --> 00:06:41

that man. Give me something. And

00:06:43 --> 00:06:44

you look at the contrast,

00:06:44 --> 00:06:46

if you would just ask I don't know

00:06:46 --> 00:06:47

I don't know her

00:06:47 --> 00:06:49

individual reason for it, but my I don't

00:06:49 --> 00:06:49

can speculate

00:06:50 --> 00:06:51

that she's now 46.

00:06:52 --> 00:06:54

What possibly does she is she gonna give

00:06:54 --> 00:06:55

a list of things that she wants and

00:06:55 --> 00:06:57

doesn't want? Mhmm.

00:06:58 --> 00:06:59

So, I mean, if everyone took that approach

00:06:59 --> 00:07:00

and look,

00:07:00 --> 00:07:02

What do you really want from my marriage

00:07:02 --> 00:07:03

other than just someone to love and and

00:07:03 --> 00:07:06

cherish? That's it, really. And the question is,

00:07:06 --> 00:07:08

can you achieve that with the person who's

00:07:08 --> 00:07:11

shorter than you or Yeah. Or not as

00:07:11 --> 00:07:13

educated in you and expand that? I mean,

00:07:13 --> 00:07:15

can you achieve that level of happiness

00:07:16 --> 00:07:17

without these blocks have been ticked? If the

00:07:17 --> 00:07:19

answer is yes, then are those boxes really

00:07:19 --> 00:07:20

important?

00:07:21 --> 00:07:21

True.

00:07:22 --> 00:07:23

Yeah. So that was kind of what I

00:07:23 --> 00:07:24

was trying to get

00:07:25 --> 00:07:26

at, with some of the questions I was

00:07:26 --> 00:07:28

asking. Because people have all these list of

00:07:28 --> 00:07:29

thing that they want,

00:07:30 --> 00:07:32

that aren't really that important in the in

00:07:32 --> 00:07:33

the grand scheme of things,

00:07:35 --> 00:07:37

which is I kinda ironic because we we

00:07:37 --> 00:07:40

we when you look at the what's becoming

00:07:40 --> 00:07:42

popular now with the the whole red pill

00:07:42 --> 00:07:43

ideology thing,

00:07:44 --> 00:07:47

This kinda almost is the opposite because the

00:07:47 --> 00:07:48

some of the ideologies of red pill kind

00:07:48 --> 00:07:50

of dictate that there are things we want

00:07:51 --> 00:07:52

that are almost uncompromisable,

00:07:53 --> 00:07:54

whereas I don't think that's true either. I

00:07:54 --> 00:07:56

don't think there are things

00:07:56 --> 00:07:58

that are uncompromisable beyond Dean. I mean, Dean,

00:07:59 --> 00:08:00

obviously, Dean is Dean, and that and that's

00:08:00 --> 00:08:01

that's a religious thing.

00:08:02 --> 00:08:04

I would say I would say Dean, and

00:08:04 --> 00:08:05

I I have to say I would say

00:08:05 --> 00:08:06

character.

00:08:06 --> 00:08:09

Obviously, the Hadith mentioned Dean and character,

00:08:09 --> 00:08:10

but Yeah.

00:08:11 --> 00:08:11

That's the minimum.

00:08:12 --> 00:08:14

Right? Somebody who has decent Dean

00:08:15 --> 00:08:17

and is a is a good person, Yani.

00:08:17 --> 00:08:18

Because I mean,

00:08:18 --> 00:08:20

you know what I mean? Like,

00:08:21 --> 00:08:23

I mean, I'm I'm trying to, like, boil

00:08:23 --> 00:08:26

it down to really the basics.

00:08:26 --> 00:08:28

Someone who will be kind to you. Just

00:08:28 --> 00:08:30

be nice to you. Well, I mean, the

00:08:30 --> 00:08:32

thing is the the idea of a good

00:08:32 --> 00:08:33

character,

00:08:33 --> 00:08:35

I would even contest that, to be honest.

00:08:35 --> 00:08:36

And the reason why I say that

00:08:36 --> 00:08:37

yeah. Because

00:08:38 --> 00:08:40

a person can be could have a character

00:08:40 --> 00:08:43

which is defined socially as not being good

00:08:43 --> 00:08:43

character,

00:08:44 --> 00:08:45

but it could be a character that fits

00:08:45 --> 00:08:47

that person the other person. I mean, that's

00:08:47 --> 00:08:49

what fits. Okay. But that's a personality. When

00:08:49 --> 00:08:52

I say good character, I mean, like

00:08:52 --> 00:08:55

okay opposite is a bad character. Dishonest,

00:08:56 --> 00:08:56

selfish,

00:08:57 --> 00:08:59

you know, kind of, you know, mean, cruel,

00:08:59 --> 00:09:02

violent, you know, stingy, those types of bad

00:09:02 --> 00:09:04

characteristics if you look at the opposite.

00:09:04 --> 00:09:06

Yeah. That's what that's what I'm saying. Not

00:09:06 --> 00:09:08

so much personality, but you still don't think

00:09:08 --> 00:09:11

that character is is a I mean is

00:09:11 --> 00:09:11

a nonnegotiable.

00:09:12 --> 00:09:13

Let me give you example.

00:09:14 --> 00:09:15

And then, again, we have to we have

00:09:15 --> 00:09:17

to refer back to the the sunnah. And

00:09:17 --> 00:09:18

this is the thing I think that a

00:09:18 --> 00:09:20

lot of our pillars don't don't don't acknowledge

00:09:20 --> 00:09:21

or recognize.

00:09:22 --> 00:09:24

When it comes to marriage interaction between people,

00:09:25 --> 00:09:26

this is not like,

00:09:27 --> 00:09:29

science or medicine or not in a sense

00:09:29 --> 00:09:31

that the messenger of Allah and

00:09:32 --> 00:09:35

the companions experience every possible scenario Yeah. That

00:09:35 --> 00:09:37

can occur. Marriage, divorce,

00:09:38 --> 00:09:39

hola, difficulties,

00:09:39 --> 00:09:41

children, loss

00:09:41 --> 00:09:43

of loved ones. There's everything in life they've

00:09:43 --> 00:09:45

experienced. So to to say that we don't

00:09:45 --> 00:09:47

have examples that we can draw from Mhmm.

00:09:47 --> 00:09:48

In that,

00:09:49 --> 00:09:50

does it the it it it doesn't sound

00:09:50 --> 00:09:52

it makes sense. So let's look at example

00:09:52 --> 00:09:53

of you you mentioned it was stingy, as

00:09:53 --> 00:09:55

in you can't have a husband that's stingy.

00:09:55 --> 00:09:56

Well,

00:09:57 --> 00:09:58

that happened. Abosafian,

00:09:58 --> 00:10:00

he was described as being stingy by his

00:10:00 --> 00:10:02

wife, but it never resulted in a divorce.

00:10:03 --> 00:10:04

And we can't even say that they were

00:10:04 --> 00:10:06

she was necessarily unhappy. She was she was

00:10:06 --> 00:10:09

unhappy with him being stingy. Of course. But

00:10:09 --> 00:10:10

she was still his wife, and they still

00:10:10 --> 00:10:11

got along.

00:10:11 --> 00:10:14

So Obviously, there's something there. Stingy. Mhmm. A

00:10:14 --> 00:10:16

person could be stingy.

00:10:16 --> 00:10:18

A person could be a bit mean. A

00:10:18 --> 00:10:20

person could be a bit rough, but that

00:10:20 --> 00:10:21

could still work.

00:10:22 --> 00:10:24

Guys, this is, this is food for thought

00:10:24 --> 00:10:25

for everybody.

00:10:26 --> 00:10:28

Okay. Okay. Keep keep talking.

00:10:29 --> 00:10:30

Me, the way I see it for marriage

00:10:30 --> 00:10:33

and, again, I'm I'm biased because, obviously, we're

00:10:33 --> 00:10:34

all biased in our own way in terms

00:10:34 --> 00:10:37

of, our own experiences. But the way I

00:10:37 --> 00:10:38

see marriage is

00:10:39 --> 00:10:41

practically anyone can get along with anyone else

00:10:41 --> 00:10:41

if they try.

00:10:43 --> 00:10:44

And I said and I said practically, there

00:10:44 --> 00:10:45

are certain things

00:10:46 --> 00:10:48

that, that I would say,

00:10:49 --> 00:10:50

would break it. I mean, someone's a serial

00:10:50 --> 00:10:52

killer, obviously. I mean, there there are certain

00:10:52 --> 00:10:54

things there are certain bad music. You know?

00:10:54 --> 00:10:56

Serial killers have fans all around the world

00:10:56 --> 00:10:58

and many, many wives that look after them

00:10:58 --> 00:11:01

in prison. So that's not even a deal

00:11:01 --> 00:11:03

breaker. So what's the deal breaker then? What

00:11:03 --> 00:11:05

what is what is something that is like

00:11:05 --> 00:11:07

if you guys don't have this, I don't

00:11:07 --> 00:11:09

know. This this yeah. I mean,

00:11:10 --> 00:11:11

there's nothing there. I mean,

00:11:15 --> 00:11:17

I I would say it's down to a

00:11:17 --> 00:11:17

personal

00:11:17 --> 00:11:20

choices and personal decision. Meaning,

00:11:21 --> 00:11:23

a person would have to

00:11:24 --> 00:11:24

look at

00:11:25 --> 00:11:28

their options, look at what they have themselves,

00:11:28 --> 00:11:29

look at what they want, and make a

00:11:29 --> 00:11:30

decision

00:11:30 --> 00:11:32

on that. I don't think there's there's a

00:11:32 --> 00:11:33

there's necessarily

00:11:34 --> 00:11:35

a person who's unmarryable.

00:11:36 --> 00:11:37

I mean, that's that's that's what it come

00:11:37 --> 00:11:39

down to. Is there someone who is unmarryable

00:11:39 --> 00:11:41

for everyone? I don't think that's the case.

00:11:42 --> 00:11:43

I mean, that's that's that's basically the the

00:11:43 --> 00:11:44

question we have to ask ourselves. Is there

00:11:44 --> 00:11:46

is there someone who is just so bad,

00:11:46 --> 00:11:48

he's unmarriable to everyone? And I think that's

00:11:48 --> 00:11:49

not necessarily the case. I mean, let me

00:11:49 --> 00:11:51

give you example. Let me give you example

00:11:51 --> 00:11:53

of how traits can be really weird.

00:11:55 --> 00:11:57

Someone who is always punctual, always on time,

00:11:57 --> 00:11:59

always gets things done when they says it,

00:11:59 --> 00:12:02

always you know? You would expect that to

00:12:02 --> 00:12:03

be that a great thing, isn't it? You

00:12:03 --> 00:12:05

know? Of course, that's just great. But for

00:12:05 --> 00:12:06

some people, that's like, I can't live like

00:12:06 --> 00:12:08

that. No. I can't I can't live.

00:12:09 --> 00:12:11

It's a no from me.

00:12:12 --> 00:12:14

But but there you go. So there are

00:12:14 --> 00:12:15

certain circumstances

00:12:16 --> 00:12:19

and certain character traits that in one scenario

00:12:19 --> 00:12:22

is great 100%. And another scenario is terrible.

00:12:22 --> 00:12:24

Let's flip it on the other side. Someone

00:12:24 --> 00:12:26

who's super relaxed is all isn't is hardly

00:12:26 --> 00:12:27

ever on time. Whenever you tell them to

00:12:27 --> 00:12:29

do something, they're like, come on. Let's go.

00:12:29 --> 00:12:30

Okay. I'll be be there. I'll be there.

00:12:30 --> 00:12:32

I'll be there. Chill, man. Why are you

00:12:32 --> 00:12:33

rushing me? You're rushing me. Yeah. Again, you

00:12:33 --> 00:12:35

might think that's just that's so annoying that

00:12:35 --> 00:12:37

this person's always late. It's he never takes

00:12:37 --> 00:12:38

things seriously.

00:12:39 --> 00:12:41

But, again, that's actually a very good trait

00:12:41 --> 00:12:43

in some some circumstances because that person people

00:12:43 --> 00:12:46

as well that fits with the way that

00:12:46 --> 00:12:48

they would like to do things. So, yeah,

00:12:48 --> 00:12:50

just those two examples that you gave, I

00:12:50 --> 00:12:52

probably would go for the second and the

00:12:52 --> 00:12:55

first because, yeah, because of myself and how

00:12:55 --> 00:12:57

I do things. So But the irony of

00:12:57 --> 00:13:00

that even is that sometimes we can imagine,

00:13:00 --> 00:13:02

you know, a laid back person would fit

00:13:02 --> 00:13:03

a laid back person.

00:13:03 --> 00:13:05

But maybe a laid back person will actually

00:13:05 --> 00:13:06

fit a person who is punctual because they'll

00:13:06 --> 00:13:09

balance out or it it it depends. It's

00:13:09 --> 00:13:11

complex. About how much are you willing to

00:13:11 --> 00:13:13

sacrifice to make this thing work.

00:13:15 --> 00:13:16

So how much are you prepared to sacrifice

00:13:16 --> 00:13:17

to make it work?

00:13:18 --> 00:13:19

Do you think so that's 1.

00:13:20 --> 00:13:23

What about the initial the the

00:13:24 --> 00:13:26

I want to say compatibility, but that's not

00:13:26 --> 00:13:27

what I mean. I mean the click

00:13:28 --> 00:13:29

as in

00:13:30 --> 00:13:33

we can kick it. We get along.

00:13:33 --> 00:13:35

Mhmm. How how how because I'm I'm thinking

00:13:35 --> 00:13:37

of these bad character traits that you're referring

00:13:37 --> 00:13:38

to.

00:13:39 --> 00:13:39

Stingy,

00:13:40 --> 00:13:41

over punk overly punctual, punctilious,

00:13:43 --> 00:13:44

you know, too laid back, etcetera.

00:13:45 --> 00:13:47

If you get along with that person

00:13:48 --> 00:13:50

and you have love for them, it's just

00:13:50 --> 00:13:51

one of those things you have to deal

00:13:51 --> 00:13:53

with, isn't it? It's not a deal breaker.

00:13:53 --> 00:13:55

It's just that's just how he is. That's

00:13:55 --> 00:13:56

just how she is. After after the fact,

00:13:56 --> 00:13:58

I mean, once you're married to the person,

00:13:59 --> 00:14:00

you know, it is what it is. That's

00:14:00 --> 00:14:02

just how he is. That's just how she

00:14:02 --> 00:14:04

is. But what about the getting along? Do

00:14:04 --> 00:14:06

you think that that's something that people should

00:14:06 --> 00:14:08

maybe pay attention to, or do you think

00:14:08 --> 00:14:10

that that also can is negotiable and can

00:14:10 --> 00:14:10

be worked out?

00:14:13 --> 00:14:14

I I think

00:14:16 --> 00:14:18

I think it's I think people need to

00:14:18 --> 00:14:20

to to really sit down and ask themselves

00:14:20 --> 00:14:21

what do they want from a marriage. Because

00:14:21 --> 00:14:23

I think what people want from a marriage

00:14:23 --> 00:14:24

isn't necessarily

00:14:24 --> 00:14:26

what they need to get from a marriage.

00:14:26 --> 00:14:27

Meaning Oh.

00:14:27 --> 00:14:29

If they want from a marriage, they're best

00:14:29 --> 00:14:30

friend.

00:14:30 --> 00:14:31

That's not required.

00:14:32 --> 00:14:33

Do do you get what I'm saying? As

00:14:33 --> 00:14:35

in you I mean, how else do how

00:14:35 --> 00:14:36

else does mankind,

00:14:37 --> 00:14:38

got married to the strangers

00:14:38 --> 00:14:39

for for centuries?

00:14:41 --> 00:14:43

And then after the fact, they've developed love

00:14:43 --> 00:14:44

and affection and whatnot.

00:14:44 --> 00:14:46

They have you have your your your mates

00:14:46 --> 00:14:47

and your best friend and whatnot. You there

00:14:47 --> 00:14:48

are other things that you can do.

00:14:49 --> 00:14:50

If you want someone to be your best

00:14:50 --> 00:14:52

mate, you can have you can have friends.

00:14:53 --> 00:14:54

It doesn't have to be your wife.

00:14:55 --> 00:14:58

There are many but but oh, for example,

00:14:59 --> 00:15:00

this is a classic one. Lots a lot

00:15:00 --> 00:15:02

of people, they get they they struggle with

00:15:02 --> 00:15:02

this one.

00:15:03 --> 00:15:05

They want perfection in their spouse as in

00:15:05 --> 00:15:06

if they're not like this and not like

00:15:06 --> 00:15:07

that. They're messy.

00:15:08 --> 00:15:10

They're they're this, they're that. They can't cope

00:15:10 --> 00:15:12

properly. And then some people say,

00:15:12 --> 00:15:13

okay.

00:15:13 --> 00:15:15

I mean, is that is that is that

00:15:15 --> 00:15:17

all they are, That one thing? Is that

00:15:17 --> 00:15:19

is the whole in the whole in

00:15:19 --> 00:15:21

that they are. Is that one thing? And

00:15:21 --> 00:15:23

I find I think if if everyone really

00:15:23 --> 00:15:25

ask themselves, especially those who are either in

00:15:25 --> 00:15:27

a marriage or have been married, if they

00:15:27 --> 00:15:28

ask themselves generally,

00:15:31 --> 00:15:31

can you

00:15:32 --> 00:15:35

so, is this issue made worse by yourself?

00:15:36 --> 00:15:38

Mhmm. No. I admit it. Yeah. I I

00:15:38 --> 00:15:40

ponder on it. I dawn upon it. I

00:15:40 --> 00:15:42

I mention it over and over again. I

00:15:42 --> 00:15:43

make it the issue. Yeah.

00:15:44 --> 00:15:46

But sometimes you can say, you know what?

00:15:46 --> 00:15:48

As as the hadith said, if you find

00:15:48 --> 00:15:50

something that's tasteful in your wife, maybe you

00:15:50 --> 00:15:53

might find something else that pleases you. Mhmm.

00:15:53 --> 00:15:55

IE, don't focus on what you don't like.

00:15:56 --> 00:15:58

Elevate that which you do like. And maybe

00:15:58 --> 00:16:00

you might appreciate that thing more. Just overlook.

00:16:00 --> 00:16:02

I mean, like I said,

00:16:02 --> 00:16:04

if it's for example, I've I've had people

00:16:04 --> 00:16:06

say, oh, this person is so messy.

00:16:06 --> 00:16:09

Okay. But really? End the whole marriage? You

00:16:09 --> 00:16:11

know, split kids from their parents over, you

00:16:11 --> 00:16:12

know,

00:16:12 --> 00:16:14

clothes here and there. I mean, you can't

00:16:14 --> 00:16:16

you can't work out something on that regards.

00:16:17 --> 00:16:19

Think about it. Someone being messy is a

00:16:19 --> 00:16:20

thing.

00:16:20 --> 00:16:22

Yeah. Divorce is another thing.

00:16:23 --> 00:16:25

Which is which do they are they really

00:16:25 --> 00:16:26

the same? Are they on the same level?

00:16:26 --> 00:16:28

Mhmm. That's basically you know what I'm I'm

00:16:28 --> 00:16:30

just what I'm saying. I'm I'm saying you

00:16:30 --> 00:16:31

have children,

00:16:31 --> 00:16:32

you built something,

00:16:33 --> 00:16:35

but this person picks their nose and flicks

00:16:35 --> 00:16:37

it or whatever the case whatever whatever the

00:16:37 --> 00:16:39

case may be. They burp aloud or they

00:16:39 --> 00:16:42

they they're obnoxious. They're loud. They laugh so

00:16:42 --> 00:16:43

loud, and it it annoys me and that

00:16:43 --> 00:16:45

kind of stuff. Right. I mean, really? I

00:16:45 --> 00:16:46

mean,

00:16:46 --> 00:16:47

you have children.

00:16:48 --> 00:16:50

We all understand children, the need for a

00:16:50 --> 00:16:51

child to have both mommy and dad in

00:16:51 --> 00:16:53

the house, and you're trying remember, you're trying

00:16:53 --> 00:16:54

to build something.

00:16:54 --> 00:16:55

Yeah. Realistically,

00:16:55 --> 00:16:57

are you gonna destroy this house you're trying

00:16:57 --> 00:16:59

to build for this 1 or 2 thing?

00:16:59 --> 00:17:01

I mean I mean, the thing is we

00:17:01 --> 00:17:03

don't we don't even apply that same logic

00:17:03 --> 00:17:05

to our lives. Let me give example.

00:17:05 --> 00:17:06

You have a business.

00:17:07 --> 00:17:09

You're trying to build a business. You have

00:17:09 --> 00:17:09

employees.

00:17:10 --> 00:17:13

Are you telling me every employee is best

00:17:13 --> 00:17:13

character,

00:17:13 --> 00:17:15

or they're good at what they do for

00:17:15 --> 00:17:15

your business?

00:17:18 --> 00:17:19

If they're good at what they do for

00:17:19 --> 00:17:21

your business, but yet they are not good

00:17:21 --> 00:17:23

in other things, you can overload other things

00:17:23 --> 00:17:26

because, ultimately, you're trying to build a successful

00:17:26 --> 00:17:29

business. Right. And marriage is about building a

00:17:29 --> 00:17:30

successful home.

00:17:30 --> 00:17:31

Mhmm.

00:17:31 --> 00:17:33

So, for example, the brothers out there who

00:17:33 --> 00:17:35

are listening who who might might be really

00:17:35 --> 00:17:37

irritated with their with their wives, for example,

00:17:37 --> 00:17:39

I mean, ask yourself a good question.

00:17:39 --> 00:17:41

As irritated as she is, is she a

00:17:41 --> 00:17:43

good mother? Are you happy to leave your

00:17:43 --> 00:17:45

children in that custody when you're out of

00:17:45 --> 00:17:45

work?

00:17:46 --> 00:17:48

And are you do you trust that she's

00:17:48 --> 00:17:50

gonna look after them and raise them well?

00:17:50 --> 00:17:51

If the answer is yes,

00:17:52 --> 00:17:53

what more do you want?

00:17:57 --> 00:17:59

Realistically, I mean, you're trying to build a

00:17:59 --> 00:18:00

home. You're trying to build something successful. You're

00:18:00 --> 00:18:02

telling me you can't overlook 1 or 2

00:18:02 --> 00:18:05

small things where, ultimately, the whole home is

00:18:06 --> 00:18:07

being built, being established?

00:18:11 --> 00:18:13

It's the individualism for me.

00:18:13 --> 00:18:15

I think it's it's everybody wants to be

00:18:15 --> 00:18:16

happy

00:18:16 --> 00:18:18

and to be happy individually.

00:18:18 --> 00:18:21

You know, like their best life and their

00:18:21 --> 00:18:23

best self. And if I'm not happy,

00:18:24 --> 00:18:27

it's a problem. You know? Like Well, there's

00:18:27 --> 00:18:28

a there's a book I'm sure you must

00:18:28 --> 00:18:28

have heard about. I'm sure you must have

00:18:28 --> 00:18:31

heard this book, empowered life by Luadora.

00:18:31 --> 00:18:32

There's a chapter in there, which I thought

00:18:32 --> 00:18:35

was probably more significant chapters of the whole

00:18:35 --> 00:18:35

book.

00:18:35 --> 00:18:37

Basically, if you want if someone wants to

00:18:37 --> 00:18:39

ask what's the book summarizing, it's summarizing how,

00:18:39 --> 00:18:40

I would say, how a woman

00:18:41 --> 00:18:42

can successfully

00:18:42 --> 00:18:45

manipulate a husband in her favor. That's how

00:18:45 --> 00:18:46

I would do it. And and there's nothing

00:18:46 --> 00:18:47

wrong in saying that. I mean, that's that's

00:18:48 --> 00:18:50

from Laura Doyle. Yes. I read her surrenders.

00:18:50 --> 00:18:52

It's Panalaz. Actually, it's so interesting.

00:18:53 --> 00:18:56

I, I was recommended her book Surrendered Wife

00:18:56 --> 00:18:59

by Alia Umrayan from Honest Tea Talk and

00:18:59 --> 00:19:00

she said I have read this. It is

00:19:00 --> 00:19:03

great. I said look even that title is

00:19:03 --> 00:19:05

triggering okay? Get it out of my face.

00:19:05 --> 00:19:06

Surrendered what?

00:19:07 --> 00:19:08

But she said no no no give it

00:19:08 --> 00:19:09

a chance. Give it a chance.

00:19:10 --> 00:19:12

I'll call myself a recovering feminist or a

00:19:12 --> 00:19:15

recovered feminist because I know how deep the

00:19:15 --> 00:19:18

programming goes. But surrendered wife for me, no.

00:19:18 --> 00:19:20

I wasn't having that. Anyway I that's probably

00:19:20 --> 00:19:22

why they the the second book was called

00:19:22 --> 00:19:25

empowered wife. Maybe It probably was. Just to

00:19:25 --> 00:19:27

bring in more of the market. But, the

00:19:27 --> 00:19:28

point is I read the book

00:19:30 --> 00:19:33

and it was like, this makes sense. And

00:19:33 --> 00:19:34

not only does this make sense,

00:19:35 --> 00:19:38

it will it will work for me because

00:19:38 --> 00:19:40

Mhmm. You know, the reality is

00:19:41 --> 00:19:42

I'm a traditional wife.

00:19:43 --> 00:19:45

Mhmm. I love it. Being kept wife is

00:19:45 --> 00:19:48

lit. Okay? That is just the being kept

00:19:48 --> 00:19:49

woman is wonderful.

00:19:49 --> 00:19:50

And

00:19:50 --> 00:19:52

so if I can,

00:19:52 --> 00:19:54

you know, as she says, surrender

00:19:55 --> 00:19:57

I think her the way that she put

00:19:57 --> 00:19:57

it was,

00:19:59 --> 00:20:01

yes. I think it's really about relaxing into

00:20:01 --> 00:20:03

your femininity, to be honest, and being prepared

00:20:03 --> 00:20:05

to receive. Whereas a lot of women

00:20:06 --> 00:20:07

bring a lot of masculinity

00:20:08 --> 00:20:10

to relationships, to their marriages, and they want

00:20:10 --> 00:20:13

to control and they want to make sure

00:20:13 --> 00:20:18

things happen a certain way, their way, dominate

00:20:18 --> 00:20:20

the situation, get their way, which is all

00:20:21 --> 00:20:23

very masculine energy. Right? And I think that

00:20:23 --> 00:20:24

the way she was saying it was just,

00:20:24 --> 00:20:25

look,

00:20:25 --> 00:20:28

give him space to lead because if you

00:20:28 --> 00:20:29

don't give him space,

00:20:30 --> 00:20:31

you're just going to end up pushing him

00:20:31 --> 00:20:34

away. And then you're going to say, where's

00:20:34 --> 00:20:36

the leader? Why are you not showing up?

00:20:37 --> 00:20:39

Why am I doing everything? John

00:20:39 --> 00:20:40

Gray talked about that in

00:20:41 --> 00:20:42

Men are from Mars or Men are from

00:20:42 --> 00:20:43

Venus. He talked about

00:20:44 --> 00:20:45

when a woman

00:20:45 --> 00:20:46

tries to micromanage

00:20:47 --> 00:20:47

her husband

00:20:48 --> 00:20:50

and ensure and make sure that like when

00:20:50 --> 00:20:52

he looks after the children and

00:20:53 --> 00:20:54

you're like, you have to give them this

00:20:54 --> 00:20:55

at this time and you have to feed

00:20:55 --> 00:20:57

them that and don't give them any this

00:20:57 --> 00:20:58

and make sure you change it.

00:20:58 --> 00:21:00

And if he doesn't do it your way,

00:21:00 --> 00:21:02

you're like, forget it then. I'll do it

00:21:02 --> 00:21:04

myself. And then you don't ask him anymore.

00:21:04 --> 00:21:05

Yes. Undermining.

00:21:06 --> 00:21:07

Right. Exactly.

00:21:08 --> 00:21:09

And by time,

00:21:10 --> 00:21:13

he's doing hardly anything because you've taken back

00:21:13 --> 00:21:15

all those roles because you're like, forget it.

00:21:15 --> 00:21:16

I'll do it.

00:21:16 --> 00:21:18

And now of course you're overburdened, you're stressed,

00:21:18 --> 00:21:19

you're resentful,

00:21:20 --> 00:21:23

but you created that situation because you need

00:21:23 --> 00:21:24

to control that situation. I don't know. What

00:21:24 --> 00:21:27

are your thoughts on that? I mean, the

00:21:27 --> 00:21:29

I I would I would say that the

00:21:29 --> 00:21:31

the the main message of of her book

00:21:31 --> 00:21:32

I read the first one, which is the

00:21:32 --> 00:21:34

one you mentioned. I read the empowered wife

00:21:34 --> 00:21:36

one. Is is effectively just saying,

00:21:37 --> 00:21:39

how do you how do you achieve your

00:21:39 --> 00:21:40

goals? Yeah.

00:21:40 --> 00:21:42

You could try to achieve your goals in

00:21:42 --> 00:21:44

a very masculine dominant way,

00:21:44 --> 00:21:47

but, basically, that's not how men work. Mhmm.

00:21:47 --> 00:21:48

And if you try to if you try

00:21:48 --> 00:21:50

to have 2 men in the same house,

00:21:50 --> 00:21:52

you're gonna clash. Yeah. And then when you

00:21:52 --> 00:21:54

do clash, you complain, why is my marriage

00:21:54 --> 00:21:56

not happening? What you could do is try

00:21:56 --> 00:21:58

a different approach to get what you want.

00:21:58 --> 00:21:59

And that's basically it. It's just space to

00:21:59 --> 00:22:01

basically play in the game. So it's like,

00:22:01 --> 00:22:02

for example, government.

00:22:04 --> 00:22:04

You could protest

00:22:06 --> 00:22:08

outside their house and make noise and embarrass

00:22:08 --> 00:22:11

them and make comedy comical jokes about them

00:22:11 --> 00:22:13

on TV and belittle them, or you can

00:22:13 --> 00:22:14

approach them privately.

00:22:14 --> 00:22:16

You know, speak to them,

00:22:16 --> 00:22:18

put your your case forward in a manner

00:22:18 --> 00:22:20

which at least give them the opportunity to

00:22:20 --> 00:22:23

make them feel that they have a choice.

00:22:23 --> 00:22:25

It's it's just 2 approaches that achieve the

00:22:25 --> 00:22:27

same thing. Yeah. But one may be more

00:22:27 --> 00:22:28

effective than than the other. Mhmm.

00:22:29 --> 00:22:31

So so so I don't I don't think

00:22:31 --> 00:22:33

she's she's she actually she's actually saying don't

00:22:34 --> 00:22:35

do this, that, and the other. She's just

00:22:35 --> 00:22:37

saying do what you wanna do, but in

00:22:37 --> 00:22:39

a more effective way. Now that aims that

00:22:39 --> 00:22:41

even just today, actually, one one brother,

00:22:42 --> 00:22:43

called me because I'm trying to help him

00:22:43 --> 00:22:45

and his wife sort their situation out. And

00:22:45 --> 00:22:45

is working.

00:22:46 --> 00:22:46

But,

00:22:47 --> 00:22:49

I just basically told both him and his

00:22:49 --> 00:22:51

wife, you both are maniacs, I said to

00:22:51 --> 00:22:52

them, because

00:22:53 --> 00:22:54

you you you're basically

00:22:54 --> 00:22:57

at each other's throats Oh. Trying to command

00:22:57 --> 00:22:59

the armor to do x, y, and zed,

00:22:59 --> 00:23:01

but realizing that it's not effective.

00:23:02 --> 00:23:04

You're doing it one way, and it's not

00:23:04 --> 00:23:06

working. She's doing it her way, and it's

00:23:06 --> 00:23:08

not working. So why don't you just try

00:23:08 --> 00:23:11

another way? Yeah. And, they've I managed to

00:23:11 --> 00:23:13

get them to try another way. And then

00:23:13 --> 00:23:15

called me today saying, it's been a week

00:23:15 --> 00:23:16

and a half, and it's working.

00:23:18 --> 00:23:20

And he's like, but this but that's it,

00:23:20 --> 00:23:21

bro. All this but you're doing, you're trying

00:23:21 --> 00:23:23

to go back to your old ways. Don't

00:23:23 --> 00:23:24

do it that way. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

00:23:25 --> 00:23:27

Just work with me. Stick to the plan.

00:23:28 --> 00:23:31

Do I think I mentioned today as example.

00:23:31 --> 00:23:32

I mentioned today that,

00:23:33 --> 00:23:34

but why is why is isn't she doing

00:23:34 --> 00:23:36

this? Why isn't she doing that? I'm telling

00:23:36 --> 00:23:36

you,

00:23:37 --> 00:23:38

if you

00:23:38 --> 00:23:39

fulfill this role

00:23:40 --> 00:23:42

and and and succeed at making her happy,

00:23:42 --> 00:23:43

being a wife,

00:23:43 --> 00:23:45

I can almost guarantee she would do what

00:23:45 --> 00:23:46

you want her to do while you're asking

00:23:46 --> 00:23:48

because she wants to make you happy. Yeah.

00:23:49 --> 00:23:50

She will find ways and see you how

00:23:50 --> 00:23:52

you become how what makes you happy, and

00:23:52 --> 00:23:53

she will do that to make you happy.

00:23:53 --> 00:23:54

Yeah. But as long as you're at each

00:23:54 --> 00:23:56

other's throats, she's not gonna do that. No.

00:23:56 --> 00:23:57

Even if you tell her to do it.

00:23:58 --> 00:23:58

So,

00:23:59 --> 00:24:00

so, basically, I said something some more something

00:24:00 --> 00:24:02

as smaller, is that easy? And he they

00:24:02 --> 00:24:03

said to me

00:24:03 --> 00:24:05

actually, what he said is quite true because

00:24:05 --> 00:24:07

since we had that meeting,

00:24:07 --> 00:24:08

every day when he come back from work,

00:24:08 --> 00:24:09

she makes some tea, and he let she

00:24:09 --> 00:24:12

knows it. You know? And she he loves

00:24:12 --> 00:24:12

tea.

00:24:12 --> 00:24:15

I said, great. That's the first step. Now

00:24:15 --> 00:24:16

your step is

00:24:16 --> 00:24:17

gratitude.

00:24:19 --> 00:24:20

If she's making you tea, you need to

00:24:20 --> 00:24:23

exaggerate your happiness. Oh, yeah. Because you're now

00:24:23 --> 00:24:24

reinforcing

00:24:24 --> 00:24:26

Yeah. That's that's exactly what I said. I

00:24:26 --> 00:24:27

said exaggerate

00:24:28 --> 00:24:30

your happiness even if you're not that happy,

00:24:30 --> 00:24:32

even tea is watery and or milky on

00:24:32 --> 00:24:34

the other eye like it, make her feel

00:24:34 --> 00:24:34

happy

00:24:35 --> 00:24:37

for doing it because then she'll say, oh,

00:24:37 --> 00:24:39

great. Is what makes me happy, and she'll

00:24:39 --> 00:24:41

do it further. So you can achieve what

00:24:41 --> 00:24:42

you want to achieve

00:24:42 --> 00:24:44

without saying, I want tea.

00:24:46 --> 00:24:48

So that's basically this is why I'm saying

00:24:48 --> 00:24:50

that when it comes to marriage, back to

00:24:50 --> 00:24:52

the our initial discussion about marriage,

00:24:53 --> 00:24:54

people go into marriage

00:24:54 --> 00:24:56

with wrong expectations, and it's not their fault.

00:24:56 --> 00:24:57

And I would say to you, it's not

00:24:57 --> 00:24:59

their fault. Why is it not their fault?

00:25:00 --> 00:25:02

Why is it not their fault? Because they've

00:25:02 --> 00:25:03

never been married before.

00:25:03 --> 00:25:06

I mean, you're expected to perform a role

00:25:06 --> 00:25:08

you've never done before.

00:25:08 --> 00:25:10

So both of you,

00:25:10 --> 00:25:13

generally speaking, are figuring it out as you

00:25:13 --> 00:25:14

go along.

00:25:14 --> 00:25:15

And that means

00:25:16 --> 00:25:18

it's gonna take a very long time before

00:25:18 --> 00:25:19

you've you've got a working plan.

00:25:22 --> 00:25:24

You know what I like about that approach?

00:25:27 --> 00:25:30

It's a it's a humble approach. You

00:25:32 --> 00:25:33

know? It's going to be okay.

00:25:34 --> 00:25:35

We're going to work at it.

00:25:35 --> 00:25:37

We're probably going to mess up along the

00:25:37 --> 00:25:39

way. I'm gonna mess up for sure. You're

00:25:39 --> 00:25:42

probably gonna mess up. But we're committing to

00:25:42 --> 00:25:43

making this work,

00:25:44 --> 00:25:44

which is

00:25:45 --> 00:25:48

so different, I think, from, like you said,

00:25:48 --> 00:25:48

the expectation.

00:25:49 --> 00:25:50

And I think,

00:25:51 --> 00:25:53

you know, I I think we have so

00:25:53 --> 00:25:55

many layers of

00:25:55 --> 00:25:58

ideas about what a relationship should look like.

00:25:58 --> 00:25:59

And I I say

00:26:00 --> 00:26:02

relationship on purpose because,

00:26:02 --> 00:26:04

you know, and any, you know, viewers disagree

00:26:04 --> 00:26:06

with me, you know, you can comment below,

00:26:06 --> 00:26:08

call me out. But I think that what

00:26:08 --> 00:26:10

we see all the time around us

00:26:11 --> 00:26:12

in popular media,

00:26:12 --> 00:26:16

in social media, popular culture, films, songs, everywhere

00:26:16 --> 00:26:17

is relationships.

00:26:18 --> 00:26:20

It's not marriage. Now you might say, Yeah,

00:26:20 --> 00:26:22

but a marriage is a relationship, isn't it?

00:26:22 --> 00:26:24

But I would say actually

00:26:24 --> 00:26:26

a marriage is a lot bigger than a

00:26:26 --> 00:26:27

relationship.

00:26:29 --> 00:26:31

And you could have if

00:26:32 --> 00:26:34

move halal and haram to the side. You

00:26:34 --> 00:26:37

could have a ghiel and you you and

00:26:37 --> 00:26:39

that girl you're like that. Your relationship is

00:26:39 --> 00:26:41

great. It's fun. It's cool. You enjoy each

00:26:41 --> 00:26:43

other's company. Everything's nice.

00:26:44 --> 00:26:45

But the marriage part now

00:26:46 --> 00:26:48

are you on the same page?

00:26:48 --> 00:26:50

Does she want kids? Do you want kids?

00:26:50 --> 00:26:52

Your families hate each other. You don't want

00:26:52 --> 00:26:53

to live together. She doesn't want to live

00:26:53 --> 00:26:53

here.

00:26:54 --> 00:26:55

Now all the other elements

00:26:56 --> 00:26:58

mean that a marriage would not work. So

00:26:58 --> 00:27:00

while the relationship could be great, you guys

00:27:00 --> 00:27:03

could kick it. A marriage may not work.

00:27:03 --> 00:27:04

And so Because in marriage, you're you're building

00:27:04 --> 00:27:06

and the relationship will be not necessarily building.

00:27:06 --> 00:27:09

This is it. Relationship is is fun times.

00:27:09 --> 00:27:11

Relationship is enjoyment. Yes. It's just enjoyment. Exactly.

00:27:11 --> 00:27:12

But I think that

00:27:13 --> 00:27:15

and, again, I I I say I say

00:27:15 --> 00:27:17

this and open to for anybody to to

00:27:17 --> 00:27:19

to to call me out,

00:27:19 --> 00:27:21

but I think that what we are

00:27:21 --> 00:27:22

bred for

00:27:22 --> 00:27:23

is relationships

00:27:24 --> 00:27:26

and not marriage. Because I know for a,

00:27:26 --> 00:27:28

you know, a sister or a woman who

00:27:28 --> 00:27:30

wants to get married, what's she looking for?

00:27:30 --> 00:27:32

She's looking for a man to love her,

00:27:32 --> 00:27:34

you know, to appreciate her. She wants the

00:27:34 --> 00:27:36

romance. She wants to have the, you know,

00:27:36 --> 00:27:38

the companionship and the relationship

00:27:39 --> 00:27:41

aspect. She's very clear about that. She wants

00:27:41 --> 00:27:43

to be in love. She wants to be

00:27:43 --> 00:27:46

loved. The relationship is so crystal clear And

00:27:46 --> 00:27:48

in her head, in order to have that

00:27:48 --> 00:27:50

relationship, I need this, this, this, this, this,

00:27:50 --> 00:27:52

this. These are these things that I need.

00:27:52 --> 00:27:54

Right? Mhmm. Mhmm. But the actual

00:27:54 --> 00:27:55

marriage

00:27:55 --> 00:27:58

and the work of marriage and even the

00:27:58 --> 00:28:00

ultimate purpose of marriage,

00:28:00 --> 00:28:02

we are not bred on that. And it's

00:28:02 --> 00:28:05

hardly I think it's hardly ever spoken about.

00:28:05 --> 00:28:07

You know? Certainly, it's not what people love

00:28:07 --> 00:28:09

to make poetry about. You know? The the

00:28:09 --> 00:28:09

work of marriage,

00:28:10 --> 00:28:13

apparently, it's not there. So Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

00:28:14 --> 00:28:15

Yeah. I mean, like, the

00:28:16 --> 00:28:16

it's,

00:28:17 --> 00:28:19

basically, fixing things like duty,

00:28:20 --> 00:28:20

possibilities.

00:28:21 --> 00:28:22

These are

00:28:25 --> 00:28:27

basically, I I I think, like like you

00:28:27 --> 00:28:30

said, the the the the institutional marriage, I'll

00:28:30 --> 00:28:32

and I'll only limit this to Muslims in

00:28:32 --> 00:28:34

the west. Because I'm sure Muslims in Muslim

00:28:34 --> 00:28:36

countries still have their culture that if they

00:28:36 --> 00:28:37

fall back on. But at least Muslims in

00:28:37 --> 00:28:40

western country who countries who are born and

00:28:40 --> 00:28:42

raised and watch the same programs and TV

00:28:42 --> 00:28:43

shows or not, are looking for what they

00:28:43 --> 00:28:44

see on TV.

00:28:46 --> 00:28:47

It's a very individualist,

00:28:47 --> 00:28:48

selfish approach,

00:28:49 --> 00:28:51

and you can see that manifest in the

00:28:51 --> 00:28:51

way they

00:28:52 --> 00:28:54

treat the children in that relationship. So I'll

00:28:54 --> 00:28:54

give you example.

00:28:55 --> 00:28:57

The cut the classic case, which is not

00:28:57 --> 00:28:59

uncommon. I don't have to say I heard

00:28:59 --> 00:29:01

or I speak. We all know of marriage

00:29:01 --> 00:29:03

break apart, and then now the husband's not

00:29:03 --> 00:29:04

not see his kid because why is not

00:29:04 --> 00:29:05

a lamb city kid and that kind of

00:29:05 --> 00:29:08

stuff. Now if you just sit back and

00:29:08 --> 00:29:11

just ask some question, put aside why their

00:29:11 --> 00:29:13

marriage broke apart and what kind of stuff.

00:29:13 --> 00:29:15

The question is you have children.

00:29:15 --> 00:29:17

This child is a combination of 2 people,

00:29:18 --> 00:29:20

husband and wife, mom and dad.

00:29:20 --> 00:29:23

There are responsibilities that are there that supersedes

00:29:23 --> 00:29:23

the individual

00:29:24 --> 00:29:25

mom and dad.

00:29:26 --> 00:29:29

Possibilities that have to be fulfilled irregardless

00:29:29 --> 00:29:31

of mom and dad's wishes.

00:29:31 --> 00:29:34

Mhmm. But because we see so often

00:29:34 --> 00:29:36

this disregard, it shows that they only care

00:29:36 --> 00:29:37

about themself.

00:29:38 --> 00:29:40

Mhmm. I mean, one brother told me, and

00:29:40 --> 00:29:42

this is quite sad actually when I heard

00:29:42 --> 00:29:44

about my days, that,

00:29:45 --> 00:29:46

one parent

00:29:47 --> 00:29:49

was so adamant not to give the

00:29:50 --> 00:29:52

the child access to the file or give

00:29:52 --> 00:29:54

the father access to the child. As she

00:29:54 --> 00:29:56

told the child the the father is dead.

00:29:59 --> 00:30:01

The father was shocked to find out when

00:30:01 --> 00:30:02

he met his son. His son was surprised

00:30:02 --> 00:30:04

he was still alive because he was told

00:30:04 --> 00:30:05

he was dead.

00:30:06 --> 00:30:06

Wow.

00:30:07 --> 00:30:08

Now, again,

00:30:08 --> 00:30:10

someone may say, yo. But maybe he was

00:30:10 --> 00:30:12

this and maybe he was that. Again, all

00:30:12 --> 00:30:13

this is irrelevant.

00:30:13 --> 00:30:16

How he and her was to themselves is

00:30:16 --> 00:30:17

one discussion.

00:30:17 --> 00:30:19

Yeah. And they got divorced, and that's been

00:30:19 --> 00:30:21

dealt with. Yeah. But now we have him

00:30:21 --> 00:30:23

and his child. That's a different discussion.

00:30:23 --> 00:30:23

Mhmm.

00:30:24 --> 00:30:25

But this is my point. The point is

00:30:25 --> 00:30:26

that we view

00:30:27 --> 00:30:28

this responsibility

00:30:28 --> 00:30:29

as something

00:30:30 --> 00:30:32

for me, this is what I want. Who

00:30:32 --> 00:30:33

cares what you want at the end of

00:30:33 --> 00:30:33

the day?

00:30:34 --> 00:30:34

Yeah.

00:30:35 --> 00:30:36

And I I know those I don't I

00:30:36 --> 00:30:37

don't I don't say this to belittle someone.

00:30:37 --> 00:30:39

I mean, obviously, your feelings aren't important, just

00:30:39 --> 00:30:40

like his feelings aren't important.

00:30:41 --> 00:30:43

But do they supersede all other responsibilities?

00:30:46 --> 00:30:48

No. No. No. No. It's it's, it's it's

00:30:48 --> 00:30:51

literally what I'm seeing is even in the

00:30:51 --> 00:30:52

non Muslim space,

00:30:54 --> 00:30:57

people asking again, hold on a minute, what

00:30:57 --> 00:30:59

was the purpose of marriage again?

00:31:00 --> 00:31:02

What was that marriage thing all about? Because

00:31:02 --> 00:31:04

what's going on now? This ain't it. You

00:31:04 --> 00:31:06

know? Like, this this is this this ain't

00:31:06 --> 00:31:09

it. You know? If marriages are going to

00:31:09 --> 00:31:11

be based on, like you said,

00:31:11 --> 00:31:12

individual fulfillment,

00:31:13 --> 00:31:14

feelings,

00:31:15 --> 00:31:15

emotions,

00:31:16 --> 00:31:18

how how much you're vibing in that period

00:31:18 --> 00:31:19

of life or whatever,

00:31:20 --> 00:31:22

they are necessarily going to be short lived.

00:31:23 --> 00:31:26

They they're they're going to be breaking up

00:31:26 --> 00:31:28

and children at the end of the day

00:31:28 --> 00:31:29

I don't know what you feel about this,

00:31:29 --> 00:31:30

but

00:31:31 --> 00:31:33

for me, when it comes to growing adult,

00:31:33 --> 00:31:35

you guys do whatever you want. Yeah? You

00:31:35 --> 00:31:36

want to get together? You want to be

00:31:36 --> 00:31:37

together for 2 years? You want to break

00:31:37 --> 00:31:38

up and marry

00:31:40 --> 00:31:41

someone else. It's sad that, like, do whatever

00:31:41 --> 00:31:42

you want. But the children,

00:31:44 --> 00:31:47

that's that's the that's the issue. The children.

00:31:47 --> 00:31:49

So thing is that that psychology,

00:31:49 --> 00:31:51

that individualist selfish psychology,

00:31:52 --> 00:31:54

won't impart upon the children. They'll see that

00:31:54 --> 00:31:55

this is how they'll grow up in, oh,

00:31:55 --> 00:31:56

this is how marriage is. If they're not

00:31:56 --> 00:31:58

happy, then this is how they must behave

00:31:58 --> 00:31:59

and whatnot. I mean, the way the way

00:31:59 --> 00:32:00

I view marriage,

00:32:01 --> 00:32:04

my analogy will be 2 rocks.

00:32:05 --> 00:32:06

You got 2 rocks,

00:32:07 --> 00:32:08

and they're rubbing against each other.

00:32:10 --> 00:32:12

Now, obviously, these rocks weren't made to rub

00:32:12 --> 00:32:13

against each other. They were they were they

00:32:14 --> 00:32:15

they're just 2 individual rocks. So there there's

00:32:15 --> 00:32:16

a lot of friction. There's a lot of

00:32:16 --> 00:32:18

noise. There's a lot of, you know, heat.

00:32:19 --> 00:32:20

But over time,

00:32:20 --> 00:32:22

these surface would smoothen off.

00:32:22 --> 00:32:24

Eventually, they'll become

00:32:24 --> 00:32:25

flat surfaces

00:32:25 --> 00:32:26

on each other.

00:32:27 --> 00:32:29

This is how marriage is. There's a lot

00:32:29 --> 00:32:29

of friction.

00:32:30 --> 00:32:32

He's he's this way. She's that way. I

00:32:32 --> 00:32:33

don't get it. Blah blah blah. But

00:32:34 --> 00:32:36

if you recognize that over time,

00:32:36 --> 00:32:38

these will smoothen off

00:32:38 --> 00:32:40

Wow. As your character will not in inadvertently

00:32:40 --> 00:32:41

change.

00:32:41 --> 00:32:43

Eventually, you get to a point whereby

00:32:44 --> 00:32:45

you can't imagine life without each other because

00:32:45 --> 00:32:47

you've you've you've become the same shape now.

00:32:47 --> 00:32:50

You've become you fit. You've cleaved. But it's

00:32:50 --> 00:32:51

about get it's about getting that way. It's

00:32:51 --> 00:32:54

It's about getting from that rough surface to

00:32:54 --> 00:32:56

that smooth surface takes a very long time.

00:32:56 --> 00:32:57

And the reason why it takes a long

00:32:57 --> 00:32:58

time is because there's so many things that

00:32:58 --> 00:33:00

got to happen. You got to have children.

00:33:00 --> 00:33:03

You got to wean those children. You have

00:33:03 --> 00:33:05

to raise those children. You have to educate

00:33:05 --> 00:33:06

those children. They have to go to secondary

00:33:06 --> 00:33:09

school. Now they become adults. All these events

00:33:09 --> 00:33:11

throughout your life will shape how you decide,

00:33:11 --> 00:33:12

how you talk, how you behave.

00:33:13 --> 00:33:14

I mean,

00:33:15 --> 00:33:17

anyone who's been married for longer than 10

00:33:17 --> 00:33:18

years will recognize

00:33:18 --> 00:33:20

how they were at the beginning is not

00:33:20 --> 00:33:22

how they are now. Mhmm. And how they

00:33:22 --> 00:33:23

are now is not how they will be

00:33:23 --> 00:33:25

in 10 years' time. Mhmm. So if you

00:33:25 --> 00:33:27

recognize that you're gonna change,

00:33:28 --> 00:33:30

make that change a positive way so that

00:33:30 --> 00:33:32

you're changing for the benefit of this thing

00:33:32 --> 00:33:34

you're trying to build. Unit. This unit. Right.

00:33:34 --> 00:33:37

Exactly. The the unit. The unit. And not

00:33:37 --> 00:33:39

just change and the thing is what's good

00:33:39 --> 00:33:41

about this is that you're not trying to

00:33:41 --> 00:33:44

change necessarily change them. They will change. Mhmm.

00:33:44 --> 00:33:46

But you need to focus on changing you,

00:33:46 --> 00:33:47

how you're gonna change. And this is what

00:33:47 --> 00:33:49

the issue is. When you're individualist,

00:33:50 --> 00:33:52

is that why aren't you changing? Why aren't

00:33:52 --> 00:33:54

you doing x, y, zed? Why aren't you

00:33:54 --> 00:33:56

working harder? Why aren't you trying to be

00:33:56 --> 00:33:58

home early? Why aren't you trying to make

00:33:58 --> 00:33:59

sure you don't

00:33:59 --> 00:34:01

burn the or whatever?

00:34:01 --> 00:34:01

But

00:34:02 --> 00:34:04

the question is, what are you doing to

00:34:04 --> 00:34:06

make the marriage work, and what are you

00:34:06 --> 00:34:08

doing to fix things? I mean, this you

00:34:08 --> 00:34:10

get what I'm saying? So Yeah. Anyway, I'm

00:34:10 --> 00:34:11

going on about the same thing. But that's

00:34:11 --> 00:34:13

basically why why I believe

00:34:13 --> 00:34:15

that is that, generally speaking, all marriages have

00:34:15 --> 00:34:16

the potential

00:34:17 --> 00:34:18

to work

00:34:18 --> 00:34:21

if one's willing to make it work. And

00:34:21 --> 00:34:23

I don't really believe that something is really,

00:34:23 --> 00:34:25

really at the end. Really. I mean, I've

00:34:25 --> 00:34:27

have had people sometimes say, oh, I wanna

00:34:27 --> 00:34:29

divorce. I can't tell this person. No. No.

00:34:29 --> 00:34:30

It's the end of the world. This person

00:34:30 --> 00:34:32

is so he's a narcissist. He's a this.

00:34:32 --> 00:34:34

He's a that. I said, cool.

00:34:35 --> 00:34:37

After about a probably an hour of chatting,

00:34:38 --> 00:34:39

you and you scratch the surface. You realize,

00:34:39 --> 00:34:41

wait. If this person

00:34:41 --> 00:34:43

wants to work hard enough and blah, would

00:34:43 --> 00:34:44

you go back with them?

00:34:45 --> 00:34:47

No. I would think, yeah, I probably would.

00:34:47 --> 00:34:48

But therefore, it wasn't that bad then, isn't

00:34:48 --> 00:34:49

it? I mean, you still have fingers then.

00:34:49 --> 00:34:51

You still will make it try. So it's

00:34:51 --> 00:34:53

just about making the effort.

00:34:55 --> 00:34:56

I'm married to a narcissist

00:34:57 --> 00:34:58

or I escaped

00:34:58 --> 00:34:59

a narcissist.

00:35:00 --> 00:35:01

I don't know how many times I've heard

00:35:01 --> 00:35:02

that expression,

00:35:03 --> 00:35:04

in It's a it's a buzzword at the

00:35:04 --> 00:35:07

moment. What's happening? Like, what what what's going

00:35:07 --> 00:35:09

on with all these narcissists coming around? Is

00:35:09 --> 00:35:11

a is a real thing. Narcissism is a

00:35:11 --> 00:35:13

real thing. Yeah. But ironically

00:35:14 --> 00:35:14

Mhmm. Ironically,

00:35:15 --> 00:35:17

I learned about narcissism

00:35:17 --> 00:35:19

from a documentary that's on channel 4. This

00:35:19 --> 00:35:20

was long time ago.

00:35:21 --> 00:35:22

Probably in 2020,

00:35:22 --> 00:35:25

2010, because I ain't seen anything on channel

00:35:25 --> 00:35:26

4 for for almost a decade. It must

00:35:26 --> 00:35:27

be about about a time.

00:35:28 --> 00:35:29

But it was something on channel doc doc

00:35:30 --> 00:35:32

documentation on channel 4 about an actual clinical

00:35:33 --> 00:35:33

narcissist.

00:35:34 --> 00:35:36

And would you believe he was married?

00:35:37 --> 00:35:39

Oh, I can believe that. I can believe

00:35:39 --> 00:35:42

that. I mean, happily married. As in Oh.

00:35:42 --> 00:35:43

She was happy to stay with him and

00:35:43 --> 00:35:44

she I mean, he was he was he

00:35:44 --> 00:35:46

was. I mean, when they was filming, he

00:35:46 --> 00:35:47

was an hour long documentary. It was a

00:35:47 --> 00:35:48

pretty interesting to see how it was. And

00:35:48 --> 00:35:51

and describing what an artist actually looks like,

00:35:51 --> 00:35:52

it was interesting for me because

00:35:53 --> 00:35:54

it's it's

00:35:54 --> 00:35:55

it's like a coldness,

00:35:56 --> 00:35:59

but innocence and coldness as in it's like,

00:35:59 --> 00:36:00

he doesn't recognize his coldness. He would just

00:36:00 --> 00:36:02

say it's in you know, I think an

00:36:02 --> 00:36:04

example of saying something like she was she

00:36:04 --> 00:36:04

gave an example, like,

00:36:05 --> 00:36:07

like, if if he if she made bad

00:36:07 --> 00:36:08

food, he would just say, this is terrible.

00:36:08 --> 00:36:09

What kind of food is this?

00:36:10 --> 00:36:12

But it's because he's unfeeling

00:36:12 --> 00:36:15

of anything anyone around him. He doesn't even

00:36:15 --> 00:36:17

recognize that it's even hurtful. It's like,

00:36:17 --> 00:36:19

she has she's she's come to acknowledge that

00:36:19 --> 00:36:20

this is just him.

00:36:21 --> 00:36:22

It's not that

00:36:22 --> 00:36:24

he's a evil person.

00:36:24 --> 00:36:26

Mhmm. He said this this is his

00:36:26 --> 00:36:27

his

00:36:27 --> 00:36:30

mental makeup. He is he has an inability

00:36:30 --> 00:36:31

to recognize

00:36:32 --> 00:36:34

the impact of his what he says on

00:36:34 --> 00:36:34

other people.

00:36:35 --> 00:36:37

For him, it's just the facts. I mean,

00:36:37 --> 00:36:38

this is terrible. What's wrong with what's wrong

00:36:38 --> 00:36:40

with saying is terrible? He he is unable

00:36:40 --> 00:36:42

to do it. But the point isn't that.

00:36:42 --> 00:36:43

The point is

00:36:43 --> 00:36:45

to recognize his faults Mhmm. But loves him

00:36:45 --> 00:36:47

for what he's good at.

00:36:47 --> 00:36:47

Right.

00:36:48 --> 00:36:50

This is interesting because as you said, evil

00:36:50 --> 00:36:53

person, and I do think that narcissism

00:36:53 --> 00:36:55

in this time is like code word for

00:36:55 --> 00:36:57

evil. I was married to a narcissist.

00:36:58 --> 00:37:00

Ergo, he was an evil man. He was

00:37:00 --> 00:37:01

a bad guy.

00:37:02 --> 00:37:05

Interesting. Interesting. Honestly, the the joke because I'll

00:37:05 --> 00:37:07

I'll just one quick quick quick point about

00:37:07 --> 00:37:08

it. I mean, if someone comes to you

00:37:08 --> 00:37:09

in the future says, oh, I'm a nerd

00:37:09 --> 00:37:11

and narcissist. Maybe just ask them. Okay.

00:37:12 --> 00:37:13

What made him that way?

00:37:15 --> 00:37:15

Meaning,

00:37:15 --> 00:37:17

sometimes because I said, the reason I say

00:37:17 --> 00:37:19

that question is important is because sometimes people,

00:37:19 --> 00:37:20

they fail

00:37:21 --> 00:37:22

to ask that question. Like I said it

00:37:22 --> 00:37:26

before, what have they contributed to that? Oh,

00:37:26 --> 00:37:28

okay. I see. Oh, how okay. That's what

00:37:28 --> 00:37:28

you mean. I didn't I thought you meant

00:37:28 --> 00:37:29

childhood or the way that he was raised

00:37:29 --> 00:37:30

or something like that.

00:37:30 --> 00:37:32

No. No. No. As in let me give

00:37:32 --> 00:37:33

you example.

00:37:35 --> 00:37:36

I'll give this one one one,

00:37:37 --> 00:37:39

example. Trying to think of an example that

00:37:39 --> 00:37:40

is not so specific that

00:37:41 --> 00:37:43

that that person might might watch this and

00:37:43 --> 00:37:44

say, oh, wait. Why are you telling me

00:37:44 --> 00:37:44

my stories?

00:37:45 --> 00:37:47

Okay. Let me give you examples. Like,

00:37:48 --> 00:37:49

some might have an argument

00:37:51 --> 00:37:52

with their husband,

00:37:52 --> 00:37:54

and they said x y zed. And I

00:37:54 --> 00:37:56

said, well, I can't understand why this way.

00:37:57 --> 00:37:59

And I think oh, what's the matter, dude?

00:37:59 --> 00:38:00

Something happened just the other day with another

00:38:00 --> 00:38:01

couple that called me up. So they had

00:38:01 --> 00:38:02

an argument,

00:38:04 --> 00:38:05

or something like that, and and then they

00:38:05 --> 00:38:07

said, oh, look. I even praised the person.

00:38:07 --> 00:38:07

And, I mean, you know, I don't see

00:38:07 --> 00:38:09

why he's behaving, so I even praised them

00:38:09 --> 00:38:10

and I tried to compliment them. I said

00:38:10 --> 00:38:11

to them, you know,

00:38:12 --> 00:38:13

the word they used was,

00:38:14 --> 00:38:15

you know, you could be so nice, but

00:38:15 --> 00:38:17

this time that this this the the other

00:38:17 --> 00:38:18

day, you did this this this this this

00:38:18 --> 00:38:19

new. It was so nice when you did

00:38:19 --> 00:38:20

this.

00:38:20 --> 00:38:22

I said, but that's not a phrase. That's

00:38:22 --> 00:38:23

a that's a that's a that's a cuss.

00:38:23 --> 00:38:25

She said, how's it cuss? I praised him.

00:38:25 --> 00:38:26

No. You phrased it as

00:38:27 --> 00:38:28

you was this way.

00:38:29 --> 00:38:30

That's a backhanded

00:38:31 --> 00:38:32

compliment if I've ever heard one.

00:38:32 --> 00:38:33

Yeah. Because

00:38:33 --> 00:38:34

it is a compliment,

00:38:35 --> 00:38:37

but, really, it's a dig because Yeah. You're

00:38:37 --> 00:38:39

not this way now, and you could be

00:38:39 --> 00:38:41

this way. But you get what I'm saying?

00:38:41 --> 00:38:44

And that triggered him to react the way

00:38:44 --> 00:38:46

he did. So I although his behavior was

00:38:46 --> 00:38:48

incorrect and it was wrong and he admitted

00:38:48 --> 00:38:48

that,

00:38:49 --> 00:38:51

what she'd felt to realize that she triggered

00:38:51 --> 00:38:52

that behavior.

00:38:54 --> 00:38:56

So it's not to blame her or to

00:38:56 --> 00:38:58

blame him. It's the it's the thing is

00:38:58 --> 00:38:58

that

00:38:59 --> 00:39:00

it's that we my married couple need to

00:39:00 --> 00:39:02

recognize that both

00:39:02 --> 00:39:04

are are to blame for what happens, not

00:39:04 --> 00:39:05

just one side. It's not like one person

00:39:05 --> 00:39:07

is, oh, I'm so nice, and I'm so

00:39:07 --> 00:39:09

happy, and I've done everything for you. And

00:39:09 --> 00:39:10

he's like, I'm a monster. I'm a monster.

00:39:10 --> 00:39:12

It it isn't it doesn't who do you

00:39:12 --> 00:39:14

mean I function that way? How do you

00:39:14 --> 00:39:15

function that way?

00:39:17 --> 00:39:19

I wonder whether there is room

00:39:19 --> 00:39:20

to acknowledge

00:39:23 --> 00:39:23

somebody's

00:39:24 --> 00:39:24

contribution

00:39:25 --> 00:39:26

to a bad situation

00:39:27 --> 00:39:29

without being accused of, like, victim shaming

00:39:30 --> 00:39:32

and and those types of of

00:39:32 --> 00:39:34

How do you mean? Explain that. How do

00:39:34 --> 00:39:36

you mean? Okay. So you said in that

00:39:36 --> 00:39:39

situation that she said something that triggered him

00:39:39 --> 00:39:41

to do x, y, z. And I know

00:39:41 --> 00:39:43

that, you know, in another context, somebody said,

00:39:43 --> 00:39:45

Oh, but you're blaming her now. You're making

00:39:45 --> 00:39:48

her responsible for his bad behavior. You're victim

00:39:48 --> 00:39:50

shaming or victim blaming. Right?

00:39:51 --> 00:39:52

You're putting the onus on her when he's

00:39:52 --> 00:39:54

the one who's in the wrong.

00:39:54 --> 00:39:55

And I get that,

00:39:56 --> 00:39:57

but I'm this is why I'm asking the

00:39:57 --> 00:39:59

question. Can we be

00:40:00 --> 00:40:02

mature enough to realize that

00:40:03 --> 00:40:05

we do all co create situations?

00:40:06 --> 00:40:08

We have a part to play. Even if

00:40:09 --> 00:40:12

you bear the brunt of the situation,

00:40:12 --> 00:40:14

you get the hard end of the stick,

00:40:14 --> 00:40:16

right? Basically, you suffer as a result of

00:40:16 --> 00:40:17

the thing that was triggered.

00:40:18 --> 00:40:20

That doesn't mean that you may not have

00:40:20 --> 00:40:21

played a part in it. Does that make

00:40:21 --> 00:40:22

sense? Yeah.

00:40:22 --> 00:40:24

I mean, the the best example I could

00:40:24 --> 00:40:25

think of will be I mean, the best

00:40:25 --> 00:40:27

thing to start off with this conversation is

00:40:27 --> 00:40:29

that often and this happens a lot. I've

00:40:29 --> 00:40:32

discussed this issue thousands of times. People bring

00:40:32 --> 00:40:33

examples

00:40:34 --> 00:40:36

whereby it's entirely his fault, obviously. Oh, yeah.

00:40:36 --> 00:40:37

Something which is,

00:40:38 --> 00:40:38

for example,

00:40:39 --> 00:40:42

extreme domestic violence. For example, he comes home,

00:40:42 --> 00:40:44

black and blue, hospitalization on a regular basis,

00:40:44 --> 00:40:45

that kind of stuff.

00:40:46 --> 00:40:47

But the problem with those examples is that

00:40:47 --> 00:40:48

those are rarities.

00:40:49 --> 00:40:50

That is not the actually the norm.

00:40:51 --> 00:40:52

And let me give you a snide about

00:40:52 --> 00:40:53

my own self. Yeah?

00:40:54 --> 00:40:55

On how

00:40:56 --> 00:40:56

scenarios

00:40:58 --> 00:40:58

are really

00:40:59 --> 00:40:59

one-sided.

00:41:01 --> 00:41:03

So one time this happened months ago, but

00:41:04 --> 00:41:05

I I I like to bring up because

00:41:05 --> 00:41:07

it doesn't show it does show how perspective

00:41:07 --> 00:41:10

is so important when it comes to dealing

00:41:10 --> 00:41:10

with issues.

00:41:12 --> 00:41:14

So one time, I said to my son

00:41:14 --> 00:41:15

he was playing Minecraft

00:41:16 --> 00:41:17

on PlayStation.

00:41:17 --> 00:41:18

I said, turn the TV up. We're gonna

00:41:18 --> 00:41:20

pray. Sorry. Sorry. I didn't tell him to

00:41:20 --> 00:41:21

turn it off. I turned it off. I

00:41:21 --> 00:41:22

said, we're gonna pray, and let's pray.

00:41:23 --> 00:41:24

So in my mind,

00:41:24 --> 00:41:27

TV is off. Game is there. Let's focus

00:41:27 --> 00:41:28

on Salah.

00:41:29 --> 00:41:29

You know, straightforward.

00:41:31 --> 00:41:33

And then he I put the remote control

00:41:33 --> 00:41:33

down,

00:41:34 --> 00:41:35

and then he picked it up and turned

00:41:35 --> 00:41:36

it back on.

00:41:36 --> 00:41:36

Oh.

00:41:38 --> 00:41:40

I mean, that's your reaction. Oh, I mean,

00:41:40 --> 00:41:41

what's what's going on with that? And that

00:41:41 --> 00:41:43

was my reaction. Probably, more extreme. I'm like,

00:41:43 --> 00:41:45

what the heck is going on?

00:41:46 --> 00:41:48

So my only reaction was,

00:41:49 --> 00:41:50

oh, is that how it's going on now?

00:41:50 --> 00:41:51

So I got I I I went to

00:41:51 --> 00:41:54

the PlayStation, and I plugged it out. I

00:41:54 --> 00:41:56

said, we're going to pray. Turn it off.

00:41:58 --> 00:41:59

You know,

00:42:00 --> 00:42:00

boundaries.

00:42:01 --> 00:42:03

Dad, turn the TV off. Let's pray. Don't

00:42:03 --> 00:42:05

go beyond the boundaries. Okay.

00:42:06 --> 00:42:07

So

00:42:07 --> 00:42:08

after that,

00:42:08 --> 00:42:10

he was a bit vexed as as a

00:42:10 --> 00:42:12

child would be. And fair enough. I mean,

00:42:12 --> 00:42:14

I just I just manhandled you. Whatever, ain't

00:42:14 --> 00:42:16

it? Yeah. But that persisted,

00:42:16 --> 00:42:18

like, for weeks.

00:42:18 --> 00:42:20

How? You mean vexed. And I'm like, how

00:42:20 --> 00:42:22

dare you be vexed with me? I mean,

00:42:22 --> 00:42:24

you're the one who want to keep that

00:42:24 --> 00:42:26

in more control to disobey my my command.

00:42:26 --> 00:42:29

Yeah. And then you're vexed with me. Mhmm.

00:42:30 --> 00:42:31

So then I made a clear. I said,

00:42:31 --> 00:42:33

your eye actually stinks. I mean, how dare

00:42:33 --> 00:42:35

you treat your dad this way and blah

00:42:35 --> 00:42:36

blah blah. You know?

00:42:36 --> 00:42:38

I mean, you can understand this. I mean,

00:42:38 --> 00:42:40

the the scenario is quite clear.

00:42:40 --> 00:42:41

Yeah.

00:42:42 --> 00:42:45

So, eventually, I'm telling my wife, look. This

00:42:45 --> 00:42:46

boy, you yeah. Speak to him because I'm

00:42:46 --> 00:42:47

gonna get I'm gonna get really upset. I'm

00:42:47 --> 00:42:49

upset. Hey. What was he how how how

00:42:49 --> 00:42:50

you treat your parents this way?

00:42:51 --> 00:42:54

It turns out, though Mhmm. It turns out

00:42:54 --> 00:42:57

that he didn't turn on the TV to

00:42:57 --> 00:42:59

be disrespectful. He just wanted to shut down

00:42:59 --> 00:43:01

the game then pray. So he just wanted

00:43:01 --> 00:43:02

to quickly go, dog.

00:43:03 --> 00:43:05

Run on what button, this button, shut down,

00:43:05 --> 00:43:07

and then play. Yeah. So in his mind,

00:43:08 --> 00:43:10

it wasn't disobedience. He was just trying to

00:43:10 --> 00:43:13

complete what I was doing. Yeah. It just

00:43:13 --> 00:43:15

happened that the way I saw it, it

00:43:15 --> 00:43:15

was disrespectful.

00:43:18 --> 00:43:20

Okay. So what's with the vexeness, though? What's

00:43:20 --> 00:43:21

with the frustration towards you that for, like,

00:43:21 --> 00:43:23

gone of weeks? Well,

00:43:23 --> 00:43:24

it turns out

00:43:25 --> 00:43:27

that this world that he was building

00:43:27 --> 00:43:28

for months,

00:43:29 --> 00:43:31

when I plugged it out, it deleted.

00:43:33 --> 00:43:34

So he lost

00:43:35 --> 00:43:36

his his game.

00:43:38 --> 00:43:39

So this is why I was, like, saying,

00:43:39 --> 00:43:41

you know, you should apologize for what he

00:43:41 --> 00:43:43

did. I said, but I only plugged it

00:43:43 --> 00:43:45

out because of what he did. It was

00:43:45 --> 00:43:46

so if anyone's to blame, he said blame

00:43:46 --> 00:43:48

himself. But the point here is not blame

00:43:48 --> 00:43:50

or not blame. It isn't. Yeah. Here is

00:43:50 --> 00:43:52

that there was this was actually a blameless

00:43:52 --> 00:43:52

situation.

00:43:53 --> 00:43:53

SubhanAllah.

00:43:54 --> 00:43:55

Oh, no.

00:43:55 --> 00:43:57

Poor thing. Ugh. I feel like it's a

00:43:58 --> 00:44:00

Not for the self self sorry for him.

00:44:00 --> 00:44:02

Whereas, initially, it was like It's true we

00:44:02 --> 00:44:04

were caring about brother at the beginning. Right?

00:44:04 --> 00:44:06

Now we're on the side of the kid.

00:44:06 --> 00:44:08

No. We are team kid, team Minecraft kid.

00:44:08 --> 00:44:09

So So

00:44:10 --> 00:44:11

we can see here that this is a

00:44:11 --> 00:44:13

scenario which I'm sure occurs all the time

00:44:13 --> 00:44:16

in all scenarios, in all relationships where one

00:44:16 --> 00:44:18

person does one thing. And in their perspective,

00:44:19 --> 00:44:20

why are you behaving this way? Yeah. If

00:44:20 --> 00:44:22

you just flip the script Yeah. And look

00:44:22 --> 00:44:24

for another perspective, why are you behaving this

00:44:24 --> 00:44:27

way? And there actually isn't a blame to

00:44:27 --> 00:44:29

be put on anyone. It's just lack of

00:44:29 --> 00:44:29

perspective.

00:44:30 --> 00:44:32

Yeah. Yeah. And and I think as well,

00:44:32 --> 00:44:34

Patricia. Yeah. I think I I totally agree

00:44:34 --> 00:44:36

with you and I think, you know, sometimes

00:44:36 --> 00:44:37

we can build

00:44:38 --> 00:44:41

well, we tell a story, don't we, about

00:44:41 --> 00:44:42

the people around us.

00:44:42 --> 00:44:44

I think, you know, husbands can do it

00:44:44 --> 00:44:45

for their wives and wives can do it

00:44:45 --> 00:44:47

for their husbands and he's always like this,

00:44:47 --> 00:44:49

he's always like that, he never does this,

00:44:49 --> 00:44:51

he never does that. And then I believe

00:44:51 --> 00:44:52

that

00:44:52 --> 00:44:54

everything that we see,

00:44:54 --> 00:44:57

we're filtering through the lens of, yeah, but

00:44:57 --> 00:45:00

that's what he's like. So he does something

00:45:00 --> 00:45:02

seemingly innocent or actually even a nice thing,

00:45:02 --> 00:45:04

but because the story you're telling yourself is

00:45:04 --> 00:45:07

that, well, he always does x y z,

00:45:07 --> 00:45:09

it's just a confirmation of, well, you see,

00:45:09 --> 00:45:11

he always does x y z. So

00:45:11 --> 00:45:12

even people's

00:45:14 --> 00:45:14

actions,

00:45:15 --> 00:45:18

we don't just respond to the action. We

00:45:18 --> 00:45:19

respond to our interpretation

00:45:20 --> 00:45:21

of the meaning of the

00:45:22 --> 00:45:24

action. Yep. And that's what we just said

00:45:24 --> 00:45:24

there.

00:45:25 --> 00:45:26

What you just said there,

00:45:28 --> 00:45:30

it's really, really important. And this is one

00:45:30 --> 00:45:32

of the things I mentioned, in my recent

00:45:32 --> 00:45:33

videos about Redfield

00:45:34 --> 00:45:35

is that it's to do framing.

00:45:36 --> 00:45:37

How do you frame the situation?

00:45:38 --> 00:45:39

So, for example,

00:45:39 --> 00:45:41

one of the things the the most common

00:45:41 --> 00:45:43

things that I mentioned about in Redfield,

00:45:43 --> 00:45:45

ideology is that women are hypergamous. Those aren't

00:45:45 --> 00:45:46

the best.

00:45:48 --> 00:45:49

And there was a scenario, like, for if

00:45:49 --> 00:45:51

a if a man who was practice 2

00:45:51 --> 00:45:52

men are practicing, but one in the richer

00:45:52 --> 00:45:54

than the other, who would you choose and

00:45:54 --> 00:45:55

blah blah blah. That they're always framing that

00:45:55 --> 00:45:56

in that scenario.

00:45:58 --> 00:46:01

And the interpretation, the conclusion is that women

00:46:01 --> 00:46:02

are hypergamous,

00:46:02 --> 00:46:05

but that's according to a particular frame. Mhmm.

00:46:06 --> 00:46:07

Let's we can look at the same scenario

00:46:08 --> 00:46:09

Mhmm. From a different frame and have a

00:46:09 --> 00:46:11

have a different and have a different,

00:46:11 --> 00:46:12

interpretation.

00:46:12 --> 00:46:14

So let's look at different interpretation.

00:46:15 --> 00:46:16

Historically speaking,

00:46:17 --> 00:46:18

of the men and women

00:46:18 --> 00:46:21

out there who has generally had more money,

00:46:21 --> 00:46:23

who has generally been more 6 more more

00:46:23 --> 00:46:26

stronger, who has generally been, more dominant, and

00:46:26 --> 00:46:28

that kind of stuff. As in the reason

00:46:28 --> 00:46:31

why a woman may choose a stronger man

00:46:31 --> 00:46:33

or a richer man because that was generally

00:46:33 --> 00:46:34

what was there.

00:46:35 --> 00:46:37

In a scenario whereby a woman is highly

00:46:37 --> 00:46:37

successful

00:46:38 --> 00:46:39

an husband, is

00:46:40 --> 00:46:42

that necessarily what she's still gonna go for

00:46:42 --> 00:46:43

all the time, or is or is she

00:46:43 --> 00:46:45

okay marrying someone who maybe isn't as successful

00:46:45 --> 00:46:47

as that? For example, if a woman was

00:46:47 --> 00:46:49

a doctor and then really well as a

00:46:49 --> 00:46:51

doctor and her husband was a chef,

00:46:51 --> 00:46:53

chefs don't get paid as much as doctors.

00:46:53 --> 00:46:55

Are you telling me that her husband she

00:46:55 --> 00:46:56

won't marry a guy if he's a chef

00:46:56 --> 00:46:57

because because she's a doctor?

00:46:58 --> 00:47:00

If she gets along with him and she

00:47:00 --> 00:47:01

loves him and she has affection for him,

00:47:01 --> 00:47:03

will she is him being a chef really

00:47:03 --> 00:47:05

gonna break the marriage down? It's the reframing.

00:47:07 --> 00:47:07

But, again,

00:47:08 --> 00:47:10

I wanna push back on that a little

00:47:10 --> 00:47:11

bit. And then Go for it. Go for

00:47:11 --> 00:47:13

it. Again, because everyone has a frame. Right?

00:47:13 --> 00:47:14

So

00:47:14 --> 00:47:16

if my frame

00:47:16 --> 00:47:17

is

00:47:18 --> 00:47:19

that I've reached a certain point in my

00:47:19 --> 00:47:21

life me, I'm just any person,

00:47:21 --> 00:47:22

miss blogs.

00:47:23 --> 00:47:25

I've reached a certain point in my life

00:47:25 --> 00:47:25

educationally,

00:47:26 --> 00:47:26

financially,

00:47:27 --> 00:47:30

you know, security wise, you know, profession etcetera

00:47:30 --> 00:47:30

etcetera.

00:47:32 --> 00:47:35

I cannot respect a man who is less

00:47:35 --> 00:47:37

than me, who earns less than me, who

00:47:37 --> 00:47:40

has less than I have And I deserve

00:47:40 --> 00:47:42

someone who's on my level or higher. I

00:47:42 --> 00:47:44

know that you're familiar with this because women

00:47:44 --> 00:47:46

are constantly saying it.

00:47:46 --> 00:47:49

Like, constantly saying it. And this is something

00:47:49 --> 00:47:52

I don't understand. You know, my my message

00:47:52 --> 00:47:53

to women right now,

00:47:54 --> 00:47:55

please stop going on TikTok

00:47:55 --> 00:47:57

and and just talking about

00:47:57 --> 00:47:59

your madness because

00:47:59 --> 00:48:02

it's just it's it's so embarrassing to just

00:48:02 --> 00:48:05

see Yeah. Yeah. My sisters in womanhood, just

00:48:05 --> 00:48:05

like

00:48:05 --> 00:48:07

onto this social platform.

00:48:08 --> 00:48:10

All your ridiculous demands,

00:48:11 --> 00:48:12

your ridiculous expectations,

00:48:12 --> 00:48:13

your arrogance,

00:48:14 --> 00:48:18

your your conceit, your your meanness really, and

00:48:18 --> 00:48:22

and disregard for for your basic respect and,

00:48:22 --> 00:48:25

and just basic decency. I can't stand it.

00:48:25 --> 00:48:27

I, I, I, I understand

00:48:28 --> 00:48:32

why MGTOW is a thing because MGTOW feeds

00:48:32 --> 00:48:33

on that stuff. So we've changed the subject

00:48:33 --> 00:48:35

guys. We've gone on another one, something else

00:48:35 --> 00:48:35

now.

00:48:37 --> 00:48:38

But MGTOW,

00:48:39 --> 00:48:40

men going their own way,

00:48:40 --> 00:48:42

black pill, all of that,

00:48:43 --> 00:48:44

they are framing.

00:48:44 --> 00:48:46

They allow those women

00:48:47 --> 00:48:50

and what those women say about men who

00:48:50 --> 00:48:50

are broke,

00:48:51 --> 00:48:51

dusties,

00:48:52 --> 00:48:52

ugly,

00:48:53 --> 00:48:55

ain't got no game, you know, all these,

00:48:55 --> 00:48:57

you know, short, fat, whatever the case may

00:48:57 --> 00:48:59

be, right? Losers, basically.

00:49:00 --> 00:49:00

They allow

00:49:01 --> 00:49:03

those women to to to be their frame.

00:49:04 --> 00:49:06

So now they view the whole world through

00:49:06 --> 00:49:09

the frame of Through that lens. Yeah. Women

00:49:09 --> 00:49:11

won only the top 1%, the top 10%.

00:49:11 --> 00:49:13

They every you know, they don't date under

00:49:13 --> 00:49:15

6 foot and all of the data and

00:49:15 --> 00:49:16

all of that

00:49:16 --> 00:49:19

feeds into the paranoia and the, I'm sorry,

00:49:19 --> 00:49:20

but the nihilism

00:49:20 --> 00:49:21

of you

00:49:22 --> 00:49:23

know, I am not select.

00:49:24 --> 00:49:26

I am not in the top 10%. I'm

00:49:26 --> 00:49:29

not a high value man. Therefore, what's the

00:49:29 --> 00:49:31

point? All women are like this.

00:49:32 --> 00:49:33

Shallow, vacuous,

00:49:33 --> 00:49:34

vain,

00:49:35 --> 00:49:35

demanding,

00:49:36 --> 00:49:38

don't have bring anything to the table and

00:49:38 --> 00:49:39

all of that because

00:49:40 --> 00:49:41

ladies, that's what y'all putting out on social

00:49:41 --> 00:49:43

media, and they just make videos of it.

00:49:44 --> 00:49:45

But anyway But that's the thing is, when

00:49:45 --> 00:49:48

they say women are like this, the question

00:49:48 --> 00:49:49

I say is, is that due to her

00:49:49 --> 00:49:52

innate nature or due to her nurture?

00:49:52 --> 00:49:55

Very good point. Very, very good point.

00:49:56 --> 00:49:57

From what I there was one there was

00:49:57 --> 00:49:59

one really good video I stumbled across which

00:49:59 --> 00:50:01

was, you know, those those feeds on YouTube

00:50:01 --> 00:50:03

where you just click on it. So one

00:50:03 --> 00:50:04

guy wants to compare

00:50:05 --> 00:50:07

the desires of women for men or what

00:50:07 --> 00:50:08

they want in a man Yeah. Women in

00:50:08 --> 00:50:10

the west are women from the east, and

00:50:10 --> 00:50:11

he chose Philippine Philippines.

00:50:12 --> 00:50:14

It was completely different. That's totally true. It

00:50:14 --> 00:50:15

was completely different.

00:50:15 --> 00:50:17

As in, they they weren't concerned about any

00:50:17 --> 00:50:19

of the other women that were concerned about.

00:50:19 --> 00:50:22

It's nonsense. It's literally postmodern western

00:50:23 --> 00:50:24

society where

00:50:25 --> 00:50:28

just everyone thinks, yeah, it's just delusion.

00:50:28 --> 00:50:30

As, you know, LTR says it's delusion. It's

00:50:30 --> 00:50:32

just this idea that

00:50:33 --> 00:50:36

I qualify for whatever I want, you know,

00:50:36 --> 00:50:37

and what I want is what I should

00:50:37 --> 00:50:40

have. And if if, you know and and

00:50:40 --> 00:50:42

basically, if you can't bring what I want

00:50:42 --> 00:50:45

to the table, then, you know, get lost.

00:50:45 --> 00:50:47

But again, like, you know, like you said,

00:50:47 --> 00:50:48

people thinking they have time

00:50:49 --> 00:50:50

and that they have all the options.

00:50:51 --> 00:50:53

Yep. Yep. But like I said, even even

00:50:53 --> 00:50:55

when you mentioned you wonder, you said you're

00:50:55 --> 00:50:57

you're educated and you've you've you've reached a

00:50:57 --> 00:50:59

certain place in your life that you can't

00:50:59 --> 00:51:01

imagine yourself respecting someone less than yourself.

00:51:02 --> 00:51:04

That's what you think. I It's a story.

00:51:04 --> 00:51:06

It's a story. Yeah. It's a story. Believe

00:51:07 --> 00:51:09

that if you had a man whom you

00:51:09 --> 00:51:11

love deeply, because he treats you well and

00:51:11 --> 00:51:14

Yeah. All that other stuff, then his qualification

00:51:14 --> 00:51:16

is overlook. Even how tall he is, you'd

00:51:16 --> 00:51:17

overlook. Because

00:51:18 --> 00:51:20

he took he you're able you basically, the

00:51:20 --> 00:51:21

question is, are you able

00:51:22 --> 00:51:23

to build this

00:51:23 --> 00:51:25

structure with this person? That's what the question

00:51:25 --> 00:51:26

is. Yeah.

00:51:27 --> 00:51:28

And that's what I'm saying. I think that

00:51:29 --> 00:51:29

that

00:51:30 --> 00:51:31

Go on. From that?

00:51:31 --> 00:51:33

No. No. I was just gonna say that

00:51:33 --> 00:51:33

the

00:51:35 --> 00:51:36

it's it's not

00:51:37 --> 00:51:38

building

00:51:38 --> 00:51:39

a lifestyle

00:51:43 --> 00:51:44

and an individual

00:51:44 --> 00:51:47

lifestyle with a man and kids attached. One

00:51:47 --> 00:51:48

of my other guests mentioned that, which I

00:51:48 --> 00:51:51

thought was so powerful. She said, look, you

00:51:51 --> 00:51:53

either are going to choose yourself,

00:51:54 --> 00:51:56

and you know, this vision that you have

00:51:56 --> 00:51:56

for yourself.

00:51:57 --> 00:51:59

I'm that kind of woman. I deserve that.

00:51:59 --> 00:52:01

That's the life I want. That's the car

00:52:01 --> 00:52:02

I wanna drive. That's the house I wanna

00:52:02 --> 00:52:04

live in. That's the kind of man I

00:52:04 --> 00:52:07

see myself with. This vision. Right? This fairy

00:52:07 --> 00:52:08

tale that you've that you've got in your

00:52:08 --> 00:52:09

head

00:52:09 --> 00:52:12

and possibly with a man and kids attached

00:52:12 --> 00:52:15

or you're going to join with another human

00:52:15 --> 00:52:17

being and you're gonna build something worthwhile. And

00:52:17 --> 00:52:19

you're going to put everything you have into

00:52:19 --> 00:52:21

that and you're gonna sacrifice for it and

00:52:21 --> 00:52:23

that's going to be part of your life's

00:52:23 --> 00:52:23

purpose.

00:52:24 --> 00:52:25

But the 2 of them are not the

00:52:25 --> 00:52:25

same.

00:52:26 --> 00:52:27

I mean, if you even if you look

00:52:27 --> 00:52:29

even if you just scratch the surface on

00:52:29 --> 00:52:30

on when people speak about what they want

00:52:30 --> 00:52:32

for a marriage, I think you'd probably even

00:52:32 --> 00:52:33

find that

00:52:34 --> 00:52:36

kids aren't even in in the in the

00:52:36 --> 00:52:37

top five things that they want for a

00:52:37 --> 00:52:39

marriage. Oh, yeah. That's Where that where where

00:52:39 --> 00:52:41

should be the top one. I mean, what

00:52:41 --> 00:52:42

else are you coming together for other than

00:52:43 --> 00:52:45

to have kids and raise another ummah? That

00:52:45 --> 00:52:48

is the primary goal. Because people don't want

00:52:48 --> 00:52:49

marriage. They want a relationship.

00:52:51 --> 00:52:52

They want couple goals.

00:52:52 --> 00:52:54

They want to have the the romance, the

00:52:54 --> 00:52:57

halal romance, you know, the halal love story,

00:52:57 --> 00:53:00

the the that the halal, Hollywood, blah blah.

Share Page