Naima B. Robert – Muslims, Marriage and Lots and Lots of Children! TMC E.8 Mu’awiyyah Tucker

Naima B. Robert
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speakers discuss the importance of finding a better marriage and finding a good character for a healthy and productive relationship. They stress the importance of personal growth, finding a better mother, finding a good career, and building a successful home. They also discuss the importance of finding a marriage that is both healthy and productive, and how it can be a choice between good and bad character. The speakers stress the importance of personal growth and finding a good partner, and provide examples of how women can be a victim of bad behavior. They also touch on the concept of "hasn't been met" and how it can lead to a "hasn't been met" situation.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:09 --> 00:00:10
			Brother,
		
00:00:11 --> 00:00:13
			welcome. Welcome to the show. Thanks for having
		
00:00:13 --> 00:00:14
			me. Thanks.
		
00:00:14 --> 00:00:15
			It's a pleasure to be here by the
		
00:00:15 --> 00:00:17
			end of the show. Yeah. It's good to
		
00:00:17 --> 00:00:20
			be able to talk inshallah. I'm really excited,
		
00:00:20 --> 00:00:23
			about addressing what we're going to address today
		
00:00:23 --> 00:00:23
			because
		
00:00:24 --> 00:00:24
			you
		
00:00:25 --> 00:00:28
			did a cheeky little Instagram survey, didn't you?
		
00:00:28 --> 00:00:30
			Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Addressing
		
00:00:31 --> 00:00:33
			what sisters are looking for, what brothers are
		
00:00:33 --> 00:00:35
			looking for. And let's call it what it
		
00:00:35 --> 00:00:38
			is, what men want and what women want.
		
00:00:38 --> 00:00:41
			Okay? Yeah. So tell us a little bit
		
00:00:41 --> 00:00:43
			about why you decided to embark on that
		
00:00:43 --> 00:00:44
			survey.
		
00:00:44 --> 00:00:45
			Yeah. So interesting.
		
00:00:47 --> 00:00:48
			Ironically,
		
00:00:48 --> 00:00:49
			it was
		
00:00:51 --> 00:00:53
			partly due to some of the content I
		
00:00:53 --> 00:00:54
			was I was,
		
00:00:55 --> 00:00:58
			consuming at the time, specifically as it relates
		
00:00:58 --> 00:00:58
			to,
		
00:00:59 --> 00:01:01
			what some people call today as, like, Red
		
00:01:01 --> 00:01:04
			Pill or MagTel or whatnot. And, also, I
		
00:01:04 --> 00:01:05
			guess I guess, social,
		
00:01:07 --> 00:01:09
			discussions have been in in the in the
		
00:01:09 --> 00:01:09
			space.
		
00:01:10 --> 00:01:12
			And, also, it was a byproduct
		
00:01:12 --> 00:01:12
			from,
		
00:01:15 --> 00:01:16
			when we did a matrimonial,
		
00:01:17 --> 00:01:19
			program. So in the past, we they have
		
00:01:19 --> 00:01:21
			done a matrimonial program where we try to
		
00:01:21 --> 00:01:22
			match people up, and we try to take
		
00:01:22 --> 00:01:24
			a different approach in terms of how to
		
00:01:24 --> 00:01:26
			get people married. So we the first thing
		
00:01:26 --> 00:01:28
			we tried to do uniquely was to,
		
00:01:29 --> 00:01:30
			bypass the whole
		
00:01:31 --> 00:01:33
			profile thing. So rather than people putting profiles
		
00:01:33 --> 00:01:35
			and having a long list of things, what
		
00:01:35 --> 00:01:36
			they do and what don't do, what they
		
00:01:36 --> 00:01:38
			like or don't like, We wanted a simple
		
00:01:38 --> 00:01:41
			profile, simple simple as in hardly anything on
		
00:01:41 --> 00:01:43
			it, and we want people to actually engage
		
00:01:43 --> 00:01:45
			with each other directly. So the idea was
		
00:01:45 --> 00:01:48
			put aside all of the things that you
		
00:01:48 --> 00:01:50
			that you think you want and just talk
		
00:01:50 --> 00:01:51
			to the person.
		
00:01:52 --> 00:01:54
			Because often we found that what people have,
		
00:01:55 --> 00:01:56
			basically, they they put aside
		
00:01:56 --> 00:01:58
			a lot of options
		
00:01:58 --> 00:01:59
			Yeah.
		
00:01:59 --> 00:02:00
			Due to
		
00:02:00 --> 00:02:02
			a vision of what they want, whereby most
		
00:02:02 --> 00:02:04
			of what they want is not really that
		
00:02:04 --> 00:02:04
			important
		
00:02:05 --> 00:02:06
			in the in the grand scheme of things.
		
00:02:07 --> 00:02:08
			And even not important to them as in
		
00:02:08 --> 00:02:09
			they think it's important,
		
00:02:10 --> 00:02:12
			but isn't really important to them. Yeah.
		
00:02:13 --> 00:02:15
			So it was all these things put together,
		
00:02:15 --> 00:02:16
			and I figured, you know what? Rather than
		
00:02:16 --> 00:02:17
			people say
		
00:02:18 --> 00:02:19
			or rather than me just consuming content and
		
00:02:19 --> 00:02:21
			and hear what other people say people want,
		
00:02:21 --> 00:02:24
			let me just ask the people what they
		
00:02:24 --> 00:02:24
			want.
		
00:02:25 --> 00:02:26
			And that was kind of what what I
		
00:02:26 --> 00:02:27
			did in the the Instagram post. So I
		
00:02:27 --> 00:02:28
			asked to see the questions.
		
00:02:29 --> 00:02:30
			I got the answers,
		
00:02:30 --> 00:02:32
			and then I tried to demonstrate or show
		
00:02:32 --> 00:02:33
			from the answers,
		
00:02:34 --> 00:02:36
			my point I was trying to make at
		
00:02:36 --> 00:02:37
			the time. So that was that was the
		
00:02:37 --> 00:02:39
			reason behind the the Instagram post.
		
00:02:40 --> 00:02:41
			And then I made it into, like, a
		
00:02:41 --> 00:02:42
			little continuous story thing.
		
00:02:44 --> 00:02:46
			And we'll definitely link to your Instagram below
		
00:02:46 --> 00:02:48
			this video, guys. You need to check out
		
00:02:48 --> 00:02:51
			these answers. It's very, very eye opening.
		
00:02:51 --> 00:02:53
			And I think your approach
		
00:02:55 --> 00:02:57
			to allowing people to discover each other, I
		
00:02:57 --> 00:02:58
			guess,
		
00:02:58 --> 00:03:00
			without the sort of the pre qualifiers.
		
00:03:01 --> 00:03:03
			Must have been a very interesting journey for
		
00:03:03 --> 00:03:05
			for people and for you. What did you
		
00:03:05 --> 00:03:07
			observe? Did were people did they perform better
		
00:03:07 --> 00:03:08
			under those circumstances?
		
00:03:09 --> 00:03:10
			Was it was it hard for people to
		
00:03:10 --> 00:03:13
			kind of put aside the list and just
		
00:03:13 --> 00:03:15
			engage with the person? What what how did
		
00:03:15 --> 00:03:15
			that go?
		
00:03:16 --> 00:03:18
			In in the marriage processing, you mean? Yeah.
		
00:03:18 --> 00:03:19
			Yeah. So, I mean I mean, just to
		
00:03:19 --> 00:03:21
			give you one example, the very first event
		
00:03:21 --> 00:03:23
			we held, this is a few years back
		
00:03:23 --> 00:03:23
			now,
		
00:03:24 --> 00:03:26
			there was one brother who found a sister
		
00:03:26 --> 00:03:27
			at the event
		
00:03:27 --> 00:03:29
			and was very happy. He was happy. She
		
00:03:29 --> 00:03:31
			was happy. Fabulous was happy. Everyone was happy.
		
00:03:31 --> 00:03:32
			But then he approached me and said, brother,
		
00:03:32 --> 00:03:34
			I have a concern. So what's the
		
00:03:34 --> 00:03:37
			issue? So the every she ticks every box,
		
00:03:37 --> 00:03:39
			but I have one issue. I said, what's
		
00:03:39 --> 00:03:39
			the issue?
		
00:03:40 --> 00:03:41
			She's a bit short.
		
00:03:42 --> 00:03:44
			I said, bro, is that is it is
		
00:03:44 --> 00:03:45
			it is it really that important?
		
00:03:46 --> 00:03:47
			Said, no. It's not in it's just it's
		
00:03:47 --> 00:03:49
			just I mean, I'm I'm a lot smarter
		
00:03:49 --> 00:03:51
			than It's just a thing in it.
		
00:03:51 --> 00:03:53
			Yeah. So I said, okay. Well, look, bruv.
		
00:03:53 --> 00:03:55
			To be honest Oh. In the grand scheme
		
00:03:55 --> 00:03:56
			of things, the
		
00:03:57 --> 00:03:59
			if if you had children with her and
		
00:03:59 --> 00:04:00
			she was looking after your children, would do
		
00:04:00 --> 00:04:02
			you reckon she'd be a good mother? Yeah.
		
00:04:02 --> 00:04:04
			Do you reckon are you happy with her,
		
00:04:04 --> 00:04:06
			Dean? Yeah. Do you reckon that you can
		
00:04:06 --> 00:04:07
			actually get along,
		
00:04:07 --> 00:04:09
			on a personal level? Yeah. But what more
		
00:04:09 --> 00:04:10
			do you want, brother?
		
00:04:11 --> 00:04:13
			I said Wow. Yeah. I said I said,
		
00:04:13 --> 00:04:14
			realistically,
		
00:04:15 --> 00:04:17
			over a a in a year or 2,
		
00:04:17 --> 00:04:18
			would this issue be a issue for you
		
00:04:18 --> 00:04:20
			anymore? And do do you really think of
		
00:04:20 --> 00:04:21
			an issue in a year or 2 time?
		
00:04:21 --> 00:04:24
			And you thought by 4 probably not. As
		
00:04:24 --> 00:04:26
			a problem, so you're literally turning down what's
		
00:04:26 --> 00:04:28
			in your hand for the potential of finding
		
00:04:28 --> 00:04:30
			someone that is just a tad bit taller.
		
00:04:31 --> 00:04:33
			And so he took that advice. Took it.
		
00:04:33 --> 00:04:36
			Took the advice and got married. And Farazanullah
		
00:04:36 --> 00:04:37
			is still married to this day.
		
00:04:39 --> 00:04:42
			That that that what you just mentioned there,
		
00:04:42 --> 00:04:44
			turning away something that's in your hand
		
00:04:45 --> 00:04:47
			for the hope that there's a potential that
		
00:04:47 --> 00:04:49
			is just a bit more perfect than this
		
00:04:49 --> 00:04:52
			one. I think it's, it's, we're all suffering
		
00:04:52 --> 00:04:54
			from that as a culture, it feels. It's
		
00:04:54 --> 00:04:57
			like there's always something better to be had.
		
00:04:57 --> 00:04:59
			There's there's someone better. There's a better job.
		
00:04:59 --> 00:05:01
			There's a better career. There's a better house.
		
00:05:01 --> 00:05:05
			There's just better somewhere, and we all believe
		
00:05:05 --> 00:05:06
			that we deserve
		
00:05:06 --> 00:05:08
			better as well.
		
00:05:09 --> 00:05:11
			The deserve part, maybe. Maybe. Because I I
		
00:05:11 --> 00:05:13
			don't necessarily it's not not everyone has that
		
00:05:13 --> 00:05:16
			Not everyone. View about themselves. Yeah. Yeah. But
		
00:05:16 --> 00:05:17
			I do think
		
00:05:17 --> 00:05:19
			I do think people think they have enough
		
00:05:19 --> 00:05:19
			time.
		
00:05:20 --> 00:05:21
			Mhmm.
		
00:05:22 --> 00:05:23
			As in they they think, okay. As in
		
00:05:23 --> 00:05:25
			we already have this idea that people get
		
00:05:25 --> 00:05:26
			married
		
00:05:26 --> 00:05:29
			maybe 25, maybe 30. We already have that
		
00:05:29 --> 00:05:31
			that that idea as in that's a normal
		
00:05:31 --> 00:05:33
			age or an okay age to get married
		
00:05:33 --> 00:05:33
			whereas, realistically,
		
00:05:34 --> 00:05:36
			25 is too late in my view. Wow.
		
00:05:38 --> 00:05:40
			So if you if you view that look.
		
00:05:40 --> 00:05:42
			Marriage is not not necessarily something you should
		
00:05:42 --> 00:05:44
			delay if that's what you wanna do. Get
		
00:05:44 --> 00:05:46
			married. Yeah. So if you can do it,
		
00:05:46 --> 00:05:47
			then do it.
		
00:05:47 --> 00:05:49
			You're better off,
		
00:05:49 --> 00:05:50
			in the long run on on the on
		
00:05:50 --> 00:05:51
			balance of probability.
		
00:05:52 --> 00:05:54
			Then if you have the urgency in yourself,
		
00:05:54 --> 00:05:56
			then you you you would overlook these things.
		
00:05:56 --> 00:05:58
			Like, people tend to do once they hit
		
00:05:58 --> 00:06:00
			their hit their thirties. When they hit their
		
00:06:00 --> 00:06:00
			thirties,
		
00:06:01 --> 00:06:02
			then they overlook things.
		
00:06:02 --> 00:06:05
			And another sad case not sad case. Another
		
00:06:05 --> 00:06:07
			another case we had in that thing,
		
00:06:07 --> 00:06:09
			there's one sister who came.
		
00:06:09 --> 00:06:11
			She was about 40
		
00:06:11 --> 00:06:13
			something. I don't know. It was 40 something.
		
00:06:13 --> 00:06:14
			46, I think. I'm not sure if it
		
00:06:14 --> 00:06:15
			was 46.
		
00:06:16 --> 00:06:17
			And she said, oh, bravo. I'm looking for
		
00:06:17 --> 00:06:18
			us. And I said, okay. Cool. Let's let's
		
00:06:19 --> 00:06:21
			what what what exactly are you looking for?
		
00:06:21 --> 00:06:23
			He said, anyone. Just I said I said,
		
00:06:23 --> 00:06:24
			yeah. I know, Bob. Do you have any
		
00:06:24 --> 00:06:28
			preferences? No. Just just a man. You know?
		
00:06:28 --> 00:06:29
			Just anyone.
		
00:06:29 --> 00:06:30
			And,
		
00:06:31 --> 00:06:32
			and I I tried I tried to mess
		
00:06:32 --> 00:06:34
			it up. Would you prefer a particular age?
		
00:06:34 --> 00:06:36
			But she said, look. Do Do you have
		
00:06:36 --> 00:06:39
			anyone available? Stop digging. Okay? Just give me
		
00:06:39 --> 00:06:41
			that man. Give me something. And
		
00:06:43 --> 00:06:44
			you look at the contrast,
		
00:06:44 --> 00:06:46
			if you would just ask I don't know
		
00:06:46 --> 00:06:47
			I don't know her
		
00:06:47 --> 00:06:49
			individual reason for it, but my I don't
		
00:06:49 --> 00:06:49
			can speculate
		
00:06:50 --> 00:06:51
			that she's now 46.
		
00:06:52 --> 00:06:54
			What possibly does she is she gonna give
		
00:06:54 --> 00:06:55
			a list of things that she wants and
		
00:06:55 --> 00:06:57
			doesn't want? Mhmm.
		
00:06:58 --> 00:06:59
			So, I mean, if everyone took that approach
		
00:06:59 --> 00:07:00
			and look,
		
00:07:00 --> 00:07:02
			What do you really want from my marriage
		
00:07:02 --> 00:07:03
			other than just someone to love and and
		
00:07:03 --> 00:07:06
			cherish? That's it, really. And the question is,
		
00:07:06 --> 00:07:08
			can you achieve that with the person who's
		
00:07:08 --> 00:07:11
			shorter than you or Yeah. Or not as
		
00:07:11 --> 00:07:13
			educated in you and expand that? I mean,
		
00:07:13 --> 00:07:15
			can you achieve that level of happiness
		
00:07:16 --> 00:07:17
			without these blocks have been ticked? If the
		
00:07:17 --> 00:07:19
			answer is yes, then are those boxes really
		
00:07:19 --> 00:07:20
			important?
		
00:07:21 --> 00:07:21
			True.
		
00:07:22 --> 00:07:23
			Yeah. So that was kind of what I
		
00:07:23 --> 00:07:24
			was trying to get
		
00:07:25 --> 00:07:26
			at, with some of the questions I was
		
00:07:26 --> 00:07:28
			asking. Because people have all these list of
		
00:07:28 --> 00:07:29
			thing that they want,
		
00:07:30 --> 00:07:32
			that aren't really that important in the in
		
00:07:32 --> 00:07:33
			the grand scheme of things,
		
00:07:35 --> 00:07:37
			which is I kinda ironic because we we
		
00:07:37 --> 00:07:40
			we when you look at the what's becoming
		
00:07:40 --> 00:07:42
			popular now with the the whole red pill
		
00:07:42 --> 00:07:43
			ideology thing,
		
00:07:44 --> 00:07:47
			This kinda almost is the opposite because the
		
00:07:47 --> 00:07:48
			some of the ideologies of red pill kind
		
00:07:48 --> 00:07:50
			of dictate that there are things we want
		
00:07:51 --> 00:07:52
			that are almost uncompromisable,
		
00:07:53 --> 00:07:54
			whereas I don't think that's true either. I
		
00:07:54 --> 00:07:56
			don't think there are things
		
00:07:56 --> 00:07:58
			that are uncompromisable beyond Dean. I mean, Dean,
		
00:07:59 --> 00:08:00
			obviously, Dean is Dean, and that and that's
		
00:08:00 --> 00:08:01
			that's a religious thing.
		
00:08:02 --> 00:08:04
			I would say I would say Dean, and
		
00:08:04 --> 00:08:05
			I I have to say I would say
		
00:08:05 --> 00:08:06
			character.
		
00:08:06 --> 00:08:09
			Obviously, the Hadith mentioned Dean and character,
		
00:08:09 --> 00:08:10
			but Yeah.
		
00:08:11 --> 00:08:11
			That's the minimum.
		
00:08:12 --> 00:08:14
			Right? Somebody who has decent Dean
		
00:08:15 --> 00:08:17
			and is a is a good person, Yani.
		
00:08:17 --> 00:08:18
			Because I mean,
		
00:08:18 --> 00:08:20
			you know what I mean? Like,
		
00:08:21 --> 00:08:23
			I mean, I'm I'm trying to, like, boil
		
00:08:23 --> 00:08:26
			it down to really the basics.
		
00:08:26 --> 00:08:28
			Someone who will be kind to you. Just
		
00:08:28 --> 00:08:30
			be nice to you. Well, I mean, the
		
00:08:30 --> 00:08:32
			thing is the the idea of a good
		
00:08:32 --> 00:08:33
			character,
		
00:08:33 --> 00:08:35
			I would even contest that, to be honest.
		
00:08:35 --> 00:08:36
			And the reason why I say that
		
00:08:36 --> 00:08:37
			yeah. Because
		
00:08:38 --> 00:08:40
			a person can be could have a character
		
00:08:40 --> 00:08:43
			which is defined socially as not being good
		
00:08:43 --> 00:08:43
			character,
		
00:08:44 --> 00:08:45
			but it could be a character that fits
		
00:08:45 --> 00:08:47
			that person the other person. I mean, that's
		
00:08:47 --> 00:08:49
			what fits. Okay. But that's a personality. When
		
00:08:49 --> 00:08:52
			I say good character, I mean, like
		
00:08:52 --> 00:08:55
			okay opposite is a bad character. Dishonest,
		
00:08:56 --> 00:08:56
			selfish,
		
00:08:57 --> 00:08:59
			you know, kind of, you know, mean, cruel,
		
00:08:59 --> 00:09:02
			violent, you know, stingy, those types of bad
		
00:09:02 --> 00:09:04
			characteristics if you look at the opposite.
		
00:09:04 --> 00:09:06
			Yeah. That's what that's what I'm saying. Not
		
00:09:06 --> 00:09:08
			so much personality, but you still don't think
		
00:09:08 --> 00:09:11
			that character is is a I mean is
		
00:09:11 --> 00:09:11
			a nonnegotiable.
		
00:09:12 --> 00:09:13
			Let me give you example.
		
00:09:14 --> 00:09:15
			And then, again, we have to we have
		
00:09:15 --> 00:09:17
			to refer back to the the sunnah. And
		
00:09:17 --> 00:09:18
			this is the thing I think that a
		
00:09:18 --> 00:09:20
			lot of our pillars don't don't don't acknowledge
		
00:09:20 --> 00:09:21
			or recognize.
		
00:09:22 --> 00:09:24
			When it comes to marriage interaction between people,
		
00:09:25 --> 00:09:26
			this is not like,
		
00:09:27 --> 00:09:29
			science or medicine or not in a sense
		
00:09:29 --> 00:09:31
			that the messenger of Allah and
		
00:09:32 --> 00:09:35
			the companions experience every possible scenario Yeah. That
		
00:09:35 --> 00:09:37
			can occur. Marriage, divorce,
		
00:09:38 --> 00:09:39
			hola, difficulties,
		
00:09:39 --> 00:09:41
			children, loss
		
00:09:41 --> 00:09:43
			of loved ones. There's everything in life they've
		
00:09:43 --> 00:09:45
			experienced. So to to say that we don't
		
00:09:45 --> 00:09:47
			have examples that we can draw from Mhmm.
		
00:09:47 --> 00:09:48
			In that,
		
00:09:49 --> 00:09:50
			does it the it it it doesn't sound
		
00:09:50 --> 00:09:52
			it makes sense. So let's look at example
		
00:09:52 --> 00:09:53
			of you you mentioned it was stingy, as
		
00:09:53 --> 00:09:55
			in you can't have a husband that's stingy.
		
00:09:55 --> 00:09:56
			Well,
		
00:09:57 --> 00:09:58
			that happened. Abosafian,
		
00:09:58 --> 00:10:00
			he was described as being stingy by his
		
00:10:00 --> 00:10:02
			wife, but it never resulted in a divorce.
		
00:10:03 --> 00:10:04
			And we can't even say that they were
		
00:10:04 --> 00:10:06
			she was necessarily unhappy. She was she was
		
00:10:06 --> 00:10:09
			unhappy with him being stingy. Of course. But
		
00:10:09 --> 00:10:10
			she was still his wife, and they still
		
00:10:10 --> 00:10:11
			got along.
		
00:10:11 --> 00:10:14
			So Obviously, there's something there. Stingy. Mhmm. A
		
00:10:14 --> 00:10:16
			person could be stingy.
		
00:10:16 --> 00:10:18
			A person could be a bit mean. A
		
00:10:18 --> 00:10:20
			person could be a bit rough, but that
		
00:10:20 --> 00:10:21
			could still work.
		
00:10:22 --> 00:10:24
			Guys, this is, this is food for thought
		
00:10:24 --> 00:10:25
			for everybody.
		
00:10:26 --> 00:10:28
			Okay. Okay. Keep keep talking.
		
00:10:29 --> 00:10:30
			Me, the way I see it for marriage
		
00:10:30 --> 00:10:33
			and, again, I'm I'm biased because, obviously, we're
		
00:10:33 --> 00:10:34
			all biased in our own way in terms
		
00:10:34 --> 00:10:37
			of, our own experiences. But the way I
		
00:10:37 --> 00:10:38
			see marriage is
		
00:10:39 --> 00:10:41
			practically anyone can get along with anyone else
		
00:10:41 --> 00:10:41
			if they try.
		
00:10:43 --> 00:10:44
			And I said and I said practically, there
		
00:10:44 --> 00:10:45
			are certain things
		
00:10:46 --> 00:10:48
			that, that I would say,
		
00:10:49 --> 00:10:50
			would break it. I mean, someone's a serial
		
00:10:50 --> 00:10:52
			killer, obviously. I mean, there there are certain
		
00:10:52 --> 00:10:54
			things there are certain bad music. You know?
		
00:10:54 --> 00:10:56
			Serial killers have fans all around the world
		
00:10:56 --> 00:10:58
			and many, many wives that look after them
		
00:10:58 --> 00:11:01
			in prison. So that's not even a deal
		
00:11:01 --> 00:11:03
			breaker. So what's the deal breaker then? What
		
00:11:03 --> 00:11:05
			what is what is something that is like
		
00:11:05 --> 00:11:07
			if you guys don't have this, I don't
		
00:11:07 --> 00:11:09
			know. This this yeah. I mean,
		
00:11:10 --> 00:11:11
			there's nothing there. I mean,
		
00:11:15 --> 00:11:17
			I I would say it's down to a
		
00:11:17 --> 00:11:17
			personal
		
00:11:17 --> 00:11:20
			choices and personal decision. Meaning,
		
00:11:21 --> 00:11:23
			a person would have to
		
00:11:24 --> 00:11:24
			look at
		
00:11:25 --> 00:11:28
			their options, look at what they have themselves,
		
00:11:28 --> 00:11:29
			look at what they want, and make a
		
00:11:29 --> 00:11:30
			decision
		
00:11:30 --> 00:11:32
			on that. I don't think there's there's a
		
00:11:32 --> 00:11:33
			there's necessarily
		
00:11:34 --> 00:11:35
			a person who's unmarryable.
		
00:11:36 --> 00:11:37
			I mean, that's that's that's what it come
		
00:11:37 --> 00:11:39
			down to. Is there someone who is unmarryable
		
00:11:39 --> 00:11:41
			for everyone? I don't think that's the case.
		
00:11:42 --> 00:11:43
			I mean, that's that's that's basically the the
		
00:11:43 --> 00:11:44
			question we have to ask ourselves. Is there
		
00:11:44 --> 00:11:46
			is there someone who is just so bad,
		
00:11:46 --> 00:11:48
			he's unmarriable to everyone? And I think that's
		
00:11:48 --> 00:11:49
			not necessarily the case. I mean, let me
		
00:11:49 --> 00:11:51
			give you example. Let me give you example
		
00:11:51 --> 00:11:53
			of how traits can be really weird.
		
00:11:55 --> 00:11:57
			Someone who is always punctual, always on time,
		
00:11:57 --> 00:11:59
			always gets things done when they says it,
		
00:11:59 --> 00:12:02
			always you know? You would expect that to
		
00:12:02 --> 00:12:03
			be that a great thing, isn't it? You
		
00:12:03 --> 00:12:05
			know? Of course, that's just great. But for
		
00:12:05 --> 00:12:06
			some people, that's like, I can't live like
		
00:12:06 --> 00:12:08
			that. No. I can't I can't live.
		
00:12:09 --> 00:12:11
			It's a no from me.
		
00:12:12 --> 00:12:14
			But but there you go. So there are
		
00:12:14 --> 00:12:15
			certain circumstances
		
00:12:16 --> 00:12:19
			and certain character traits that in one scenario
		
00:12:19 --> 00:12:22
			is great 100%. And another scenario is terrible.
		
00:12:22 --> 00:12:24
			Let's flip it on the other side. Someone
		
00:12:24 --> 00:12:26
			who's super relaxed is all isn't is hardly
		
00:12:26 --> 00:12:27
			ever on time. Whenever you tell them to
		
00:12:27 --> 00:12:29
			do something, they're like, come on. Let's go.
		
00:12:29 --> 00:12:30
			Okay. I'll be be there. I'll be there.
		
00:12:30 --> 00:12:32
			I'll be there. Chill, man. Why are you
		
00:12:32 --> 00:12:33
			rushing me? You're rushing me. Yeah. Again, you
		
00:12:33 --> 00:12:35
			might think that's just that's so annoying that
		
00:12:35 --> 00:12:37
			this person's always late. It's he never takes
		
00:12:37 --> 00:12:38
			things seriously.
		
00:12:39 --> 00:12:41
			But, again, that's actually a very good trait
		
00:12:41 --> 00:12:43
			in some some circumstances because that person people
		
00:12:43 --> 00:12:46
			as well that fits with the way that
		
00:12:46 --> 00:12:48
			they would like to do things. So, yeah,
		
00:12:48 --> 00:12:50
			just those two examples that you gave, I
		
00:12:50 --> 00:12:52
			probably would go for the second and the
		
00:12:52 --> 00:12:55
			first because, yeah, because of myself and how
		
00:12:55 --> 00:12:57
			I do things. So But the irony of
		
00:12:57 --> 00:13:00
			that even is that sometimes we can imagine,
		
00:13:00 --> 00:13:02
			you know, a laid back person would fit
		
00:13:02 --> 00:13:03
			a laid back person.
		
00:13:03 --> 00:13:05
			But maybe a laid back person will actually
		
00:13:05 --> 00:13:06
			fit a person who is punctual because they'll
		
00:13:06 --> 00:13:09
			balance out or it it it depends. It's
		
00:13:09 --> 00:13:11
			complex. About how much are you willing to
		
00:13:11 --> 00:13:13
			sacrifice to make this thing work.
		
00:13:15 --> 00:13:16
			So how much are you prepared to sacrifice
		
00:13:16 --> 00:13:17
			to make it work?
		
00:13:18 --> 00:13:19
			Do you think so that's 1.
		
00:13:20 --> 00:13:23
			What about the initial the the
		
00:13:24 --> 00:13:26
			I want to say compatibility, but that's not
		
00:13:26 --> 00:13:27
			what I mean. I mean the click
		
00:13:28 --> 00:13:29
			as in
		
00:13:30 --> 00:13:33
			we can kick it. We get along.
		
00:13:33 --> 00:13:35
			Mhmm. How how how because I'm I'm thinking
		
00:13:35 --> 00:13:37
			of these bad character traits that you're referring
		
00:13:37 --> 00:13:38
			to.
		
00:13:39 --> 00:13:39
			Stingy,
		
00:13:40 --> 00:13:41
			over punk overly punctual, punctilious,
		
00:13:43 --> 00:13:44
			you know, too laid back, etcetera.
		
00:13:45 --> 00:13:47
			If you get along with that person
		
00:13:48 --> 00:13:50
			and you have love for them, it's just
		
00:13:50 --> 00:13:51
			one of those things you have to deal
		
00:13:51 --> 00:13:53
			with, isn't it? It's not a deal breaker.
		
00:13:53 --> 00:13:55
			It's just that's just how he is. That's
		
00:13:55 --> 00:13:56
			just how she is. After after the fact,
		
00:13:56 --> 00:13:58
			I mean, once you're married to the person,
		
00:13:59 --> 00:14:00
			you know, it is what it is. That's
		
00:14:00 --> 00:14:02
			just how he is. That's just how she
		
00:14:02 --> 00:14:04
			is. But what about the getting along? Do
		
00:14:04 --> 00:14:06
			you think that that's something that people should
		
00:14:06 --> 00:14:08
			maybe pay attention to, or do you think
		
00:14:08 --> 00:14:10
			that that also can is negotiable and can
		
00:14:10 --> 00:14:10
			be worked out?
		
00:14:13 --> 00:14:14
			I I think
		
00:14:16 --> 00:14:18
			I think it's I think people need to
		
00:14:18 --> 00:14:20
			to to really sit down and ask themselves
		
00:14:20 --> 00:14:21
			what do they want from a marriage. Because
		
00:14:21 --> 00:14:23
			I think what people want from a marriage
		
00:14:23 --> 00:14:24
			isn't necessarily
		
00:14:24 --> 00:14:26
			what they need to get from a marriage.
		
00:14:26 --> 00:14:27
			Meaning Oh.
		
00:14:27 --> 00:14:29
			If they want from a marriage, they're best
		
00:14:29 --> 00:14:30
			friend.
		
00:14:30 --> 00:14:31
			That's not required.
		
00:14:32 --> 00:14:33
			Do do you get what I'm saying? As
		
00:14:33 --> 00:14:35
			in you I mean, how else do how
		
00:14:35 --> 00:14:36
			else does mankind,
		
00:14:37 --> 00:14:38
			got married to the strangers
		
00:14:38 --> 00:14:39
			for for centuries?
		
00:14:41 --> 00:14:43
			And then after the fact, they've developed love
		
00:14:43 --> 00:14:44
			and affection and whatnot.
		
00:14:44 --> 00:14:46
			They have you have your your your mates
		
00:14:46 --> 00:14:47
			and your best friend and whatnot. You there
		
00:14:47 --> 00:14:48
			are other things that you can do.
		
00:14:49 --> 00:14:50
			If you want someone to be your best
		
00:14:50 --> 00:14:52
			mate, you can have you can have friends.
		
00:14:53 --> 00:14:54
			It doesn't have to be your wife.
		
00:14:55 --> 00:14:58
			There are many but but oh, for example,
		
00:14:59 --> 00:15:00
			this is a classic one. Lots a lot
		
00:15:00 --> 00:15:02
			of people, they get they they struggle with
		
00:15:02 --> 00:15:02
			this one.
		
00:15:03 --> 00:15:05
			They want perfection in their spouse as in
		
00:15:05 --> 00:15:06
			if they're not like this and not like
		
00:15:06 --> 00:15:07
			that. They're messy.
		
00:15:08 --> 00:15:10
			They're they're this, they're that. They can't cope
		
00:15:10 --> 00:15:12
			properly. And then some people say,
		
00:15:12 --> 00:15:13
			okay.
		
00:15:13 --> 00:15:15
			I mean, is that is that is that
		
00:15:15 --> 00:15:17
			all they are, That one thing? Is that
		
00:15:17 --> 00:15:19
			is the whole in the whole in
		
00:15:19 --> 00:15:21
			that they are. Is that one thing? And
		
00:15:21 --> 00:15:23
			I find I think if if everyone really
		
00:15:23 --> 00:15:25
			ask themselves, especially those who are either in
		
00:15:25 --> 00:15:27
			a marriage or have been married, if they
		
00:15:27 --> 00:15:28
			ask themselves generally,
		
00:15:31 --> 00:15:31
			can you
		
00:15:32 --> 00:15:35
			so, is this issue made worse by yourself?
		
00:15:36 --> 00:15:38
			Mhmm. No. I admit it. Yeah. I I
		
00:15:38 --> 00:15:40
			ponder on it. I dawn upon it. I
		
00:15:40 --> 00:15:42
			I mention it over and over again. I
		
00:15:42 --> 00:15:43
			make it the issue. Yeah.
		
00:15:44 --> 00:15:46
			But sometimes you can say, you know what?
		
00:15:46 --> 00:15:48
			As as the hadith said, if you find
		
00:15:48 --> 00:15:50
			something that's tasteful in your wife, maybe you
		
00:15:50 --> 00:15:53
			might find something else that pleases you. Mhmm.
		
00:15:53 --> 00:15:55
			IE, don't focus on what you don't like.
		
00:15:56 --> 00:15:58
			Elevate that which you do like. And maybe
		
00:15:58 --> 00:16:00
			you might appreciate that thing more. Just overlook.
		
00:16:00 --> 00:16:02
			I mean, like I said,
		
00:16:02 --> 00:16:04
			if it's for example, I've I've had people
		
00:16:04 --> 00:16:06
			say, oh, this person is so messy.
		
00:16:06 --> 00:16:09
			Okay. But really? End the whole marriage? You
		
00:16:09 --> 00:16:11
			know, split kids from their parents over, you
		
00:16:11 --> 00:16:12
			know,
		
00:16:12 --> 00:16:14
			clothes here and there. I mean, you can't
		
00:16:14 --> 00:16:16
			you can't work out something on that regards.
		
00:16:17 --> 00:16:19
			Think about it. Someone being messy is a
		
00:16:19 --> 00:16:20
			thing.
		
00:16:20 --> 00:16:22
			Yeah. Divorce is another thing.
		
00:16:23 --> 00:16:25
			Which is which do they are they really
		
00:16:25 --> 00:16:26
			the same? Are they on the same level?
		
00:16:26 --> 00:16:28
			Mhmm. That's basically you know what I'm I'm
		
00:16:28 --> 00:16:30
			just what I'm saying. I'm I'm saying you
		
00:16:30 --> 00:16:31
			have children,
		
00:16:31 --> 00:16:32
			you built something,
		
00:16:33 --> 00:16:35
			but this person picks their nose and flicks
		
00:16:35 --> 00:16:37
			it or whatever the case whatever whatever the
		
00:16:37 --> 00:16:39
			case may be. They burp aloud or they
		
00:16:39 --> 00:16:42
			they they're obnoxious. They're loud. They laugh so
		
00:16:42 --> 00:16:43
			loud, and it it annoys me and that
		
00:16:43 --> 00:16:45
			kind of stuff. Right. I mean, really? I
		
00:16:45 --> 00:16:46
			mean,
		
00:16:46 --> 00:16:47
			you have children.
		
00:16:48 --> 00:16:50
			We all understand children, the need for a
		
00:16:50 --> 00:16:51
			child to have both mommy and dad in
		
00:16:51 --> 00:16:53
			the house, and you're trying remember, you're trying
		
00:16:53 --> 00:16:54
			to build something.
		
00:16:54 --> 00:16:55
			Yeah. Realistically,
		
00:16:55 --> 00:16:57
			are you gonna destroy this house you're trying
		
00:16:57 --> 00:16:59
			to build for this 1 or 2 thing?
		
00:16:59 --> 00:17:01
			I mean I mean, the thing is we
		
00:17:01 --> 00:17:03
			don't we don't even apply that same logic
		
00:17:03 --> 00:17:05
			to our lives. Let me give example.
		
00:17:05 --> 00:17:06
			You have a business.
		
00:17:07 --> 00:17:09
			You're trying to build a business. You have
		
00:17:09 --> 00:17:09
			employees.
		
00:17:10 --> 00:17:13
			Are you telling me every employee is best
		
00:17:13 --> 00:17:13
			character,
		
00:17:13 --> 00:17:15
			or they're good at what they do for
		
00:17:15 --> 00:17:15
			your business?
		
00:17:18 --> 00:17:19
			If they're good at what they do for
		
00:17:19 --> 00:17:21
			your business, but yet they are not good
		
00:17:21 --> 00:17:23
			in other things, you can overload other things
		
00:17:23 --> 00:17:26
			because, ultimately, you're trying to build a successful
		
00:17:26 --> 00:17:29
			business. Right. And marriage is about building a
		
00:17:29 --> 00:17:30
			successful home.
		
00:17:30 --> 00:17:31
			Mhmm.
		
00:17:31 --> 00:17:33
			So, for example, the brothers out there who
		
00:17:33 --> 00:17:35
			are listening who who might might be really
		
00:17:35 --> 00:17:37
			irritated with their with their wives, for example,
		
00:17:37 --> 00:17:39
			I mean, ask yourself a good question.
		
00:17:39 --> 00:17:41
			As irritated as she is, is she a
		
00:17:41 --> 00:17:43
			good mother? Are you happy to leave your
		
00:17:43 --> 00:17:45
			children in that custody when you're out of
		
00:17:45 --> 00:17:45
			work?
		
00:17:46 --> 00:17:48
			And are you do you trust that she's
		
00:17:48 --> 00:17:50
			gonna look after them and raise them well?
		
00:17:50 --> 00:17:51
			If the answer is yes,
		
00:17:52 --> 00:17:53
			what more do you want?
		
00:17:57 --> 00:17:59
			Realistically, I mean, you're trying to build a
		
00:17:59 --> 00:18:00
			home. You're trying to build something successful. You're
		
00:18:00 --> 00:18:02
			telling me you can't overlook 1 or 2
		
00:18:02 --> 00:18:05
			small things where, ultimately, the whole home is
		
00:18:06 --> 00:18:07
			being built, being established?
		
00:18:11 --> 00:18:13
			It's the individualism for me.
		
00:18:13 --> 00:18:15
			I think it's it's everybody wants to be
		
00:18:15 --> 00:18:16
			happy
		
00:18:16 --> 00:18:18
			and to be happy individually.
		
00:18:18 --> 00:18:21
			You know, like their best life and their
		
00:18:21 --> 00:18:23
			best self. And if I'm not happy,
		
00:18:24 --> 00:18:27
			it's a problem. You know? Like Well, there's
		
00:18:27 --> 00:18:28
			a there's a book I'm sure you must
		
00:18:28 --> 00:18:28
			have heard about. I'm sure you must have
		
00:18:28 --> 00:18:31
			heard this book, empowered life by Luadora.
		
00:18:31 --> 00:18:32
			There's a chapter in there, which I thought
		
00:18:32 --> 00:18:35
			was probably more significant chapters of the whole
		
00:18:35 --> 00:18:35
			book.
		
00:18:35 --> 00:18:37
			Basically, if you want if someone wants to
		
00:18:37 --> 00:18:39
			ask what's the book summarizing, it's summarizing how,
		
00:18:39 --> 00:18:40
			I would say, how a woman
		
00:18:41 --> 00:18:42
			can successfully
		
00:18:42 --> 00:18:45
			manipulate a husband in her favor. That's how
		
00:18:45 --> 00:18:46
			I would do it. And and there's nothing
		
00:18:46 --> 00:18:47
			wrong in saying that. I mean, that's that's
		
00:18:48 --> 00:18:50
			from Laura Doyle. Yes. I read her surrenders.
		
00:18:50 --> 00:18:52
			It's Panalaz. Actually, it's so interesting.
		
00:18:53 --> 00:18:56
			I, I was recommended her book Surrendered Wife
		
00:18:56 --> 00:18:59
			by Alia Umrayan from Honest Tea Talk and
		
00:18:59 --> 00:19:00
			she said I have read this. It is
		
00:19:00 --> 00:19:03
			great. I said look even that title is
		
00:19:03 --> 00:19:05
			triggering okay? Get it out of my face.
		
00:19:05 --> 00:19:06
			Surrendered what?
		
00:19:07 --> 00:19:08
			But she said no no no give it
		
00:19:08 --> 00:19:09
			a chance. Give it a chance.
		
00:19:10 --> 00:19:12
			I'll call myself a recovering feminist or a
		
00:19:12 --> 00:19:15
			recovered feminist because I know how deep the
		
00:19:15 --> 00:19:18
			programming goes. But surrendered wife for me, no.
		
00:19:18 --> 00:19:20
			I wasn't having that. Anyway I that's probably
		
00:19:20 --> 00:19:22
			why they the the second book was called
		
00:19:22 --> 00:19:25
			empowered wife. Maybe It probably was. Just to
		
00:19:25 --> 00:19:27
			bring in more of the market. But, the
		
00:19:27 --> 00:19:28
			point is I read the book
		
00:19:30 --> 00:19:33
			and it was like, this makes sense. And
		
00:19:33 --> 00:19:34
			not only does this make sense,
		
00:19:35 --> 00:19:38
			it will it will work for me because
		
00:19:38 --> 00:19:40
			Mhmm. You know, the reality is
		
00:19:41 --> 00:19:42
			I'm a traditional wife.
		
00:19:43 --> 00:19:45
			Mhmm. I love it. Being kept wife is
		
00:19:45 --> 00:19:48
			lit. Okay? That is just the being kept
		
00:19:48 --> 00:19:49
			woman is wonderful.
		
00:19:49 --> 00:19:50
			And
		
00:19:50 --> 00:19:52
			so if I can,
		
00:19:52 --> 00:19:54
			you know, as she says, surrender
		
00:19:55 --> 00:19:57
			I think her the way that she put
		
00:19:57 --> 00:19:57
			it was,
		
00:19:59 --> 00:20:01
			yes. I think it's really about relaxing into
		
00:20:01 --> 00:20:03
			your femininity, to be honest, and being prepared
		
00:20:03 --> 00:20:05
			to receive. Whereas a lot of women
		
00:20:06 --> 00:20:07
			bring a lot of masculinity
		
00:20:08 --> 00:20:10
			to relationships, to their marriages, and they want
		
00:20:10 --> 00:20:13
			to control and they want to make sure
		
00:20:13 --> 00:20:18
			things happen a certain way, their way, dominate
		
00:20:18 --> 00:20:20
			the situation, get their way, which is all
		
00:20:21 --> 00:20:23
			very masculine energy. Right? And I think that
		
00:20:23 --> 00:20:24
			the way she was saying it was just,
		
00:20:24 --> 00:20:25
			look,
		
00:20:25 --> 00:20:28
			give him space to lead because if you
		
00:20:28 --> 00:20:29
			don't give him space,
		
00:20:30 --> 00:20:31
			you're just going to end up pushing him
		
00:20:31 --> 00:20:34
			away. And then you're going to say, where's
		
00:20:34 --> 00:20:36
			the leader? Why are you not showing up?
		
00:20:37 --> 00:20:39
			Why am I doing everything? John
		
00:20:39 --> 00:20:40
			Gray talked about that in
		
00:20:41 --> 00:20:42
			Men are from Mars or Men are from
		
00:20:42 --> 00:20:43
			Venus. He talked about
		
00:20:44 --> 00:20:45
			when a woman
		
00:20:45 --> 00:20:46
			tries to micromanage
		
00:20:47 --> 00:20:47
			her husband
		
00:20:48 --> 00:20:50
			and ensure and make sure that like when
		
00:20:50 --> 00:20:52
			he looks after the children and
		
00:20:53 --> 00:20:54
			you're like, you have to give them this
		
00:20:54 --> 00:20:55
			at this time and you have to feed
		
00:20:55 --> 00:20:57
			them that and don't give them any this
		
00:20:57 --> 00:20:58
			and make sure you change it.
		
00:20:58 --> 00:21:00
			And if he doesn't do it your way,
		
00:21:00 --> 00:21:02
			you're like, forget it then. I'll do it
		
00:21:02 --> 00:21:04
			myself. And then you don't ask him anymore.
		
00:21:04 --> 00:21:05
			Yes. Undermining.
		
00:21:06 --> 00:21:07
			Right. Exactly.
		
00:21:08 --> 00:21:09
			And by time,
		
00:21:10 --> 00:21:13
			he's doing hardly anything because you've taken back
		
00:21:13 --> 00:21:15
			all those roles because you're like, forget it.
		
00:21:15 --> 00:21:16
			I'll do it.
		
00:21:16 --> 00:21:18
			And now of course you're overburdened, you're stressed,
		
00:21:18 --> 00:21:19
			you're resentful,
		
00:21:20 --> 00:21:23
			but you created that situation because you need
		
00:21:23 --> 00:21:24
			to control that situation. I don't know. What
		
00:21:24 --> 00:21:27
			are your thoughts on that? I mean, the
		
00:21:27 --> 00:21:29
			I I would I would say that the
		
00:21:29 --> 00:21:31
			the the main message of of her book
		
00:21:31 --> 00:21:32
			I read the first one, which is the
		
00:21:32 --> 00:21:34
			one you mentioned. I read the empowered wife
		
00:21:34 --> 00:21:36
			one. Is is effectively just saying,
		
00:21:37 --> 00:21:39
			how do you how do you achieve your
		
00:21:39 --> 00:21:40
			goals? Yeah.
		
00:21:40 --> 00:21:42
			You could try to achieve your goals in
		
00:21:42 --> 00:21:44
			a very masculine dominant way,
		
00:21:44 --> 00:21:47
			but, basically, that's not how men work. Mhmm.
		
00:21:47 --> 00:21:48
			And if you try to if you try
		
00:21:48 --> 00:21:50
			to have 2 men in the same house,
		
00:21:50 --> 00:21:52
			you're gonna clash. Yeah. And then when you
		
00:21:52 --> 00:21:54
			do clash, you complain, why is my marriage
		
00:21:54 --> 00:21:56
			not happening? What you could do is try
		
00:21:56 --> 00:21:58
			a different approach to get what you want.
		
00:21:58 --> 00:21:59
			And that's basically it. It's just space to
		
00:21:59 --> 00:22:01
			basically play in the game. So it's like,
		
00:22:01 --> 00:22:02
			for example, government.
		
00:22:04 --> 00:22:04
			You could protest
		
00:22:06 --> 00:22:08
			outside their house and make noise and embarrass
		
00:22:08 --> 00:22:11
			them and make comedy comical jokes about them
		
00:22:11 --> 00:22:13
			on TV and belittle them, or you can
		
00:22:13 --> 00:22:14
			approach them privately.
		
00:22:14 --> 00:22:16
			You know, speak to them,
		
00:22:16 --> 00:22:18
			put your your case forward in a manner
		
00:22:18 --> 00:22:20
			which at least give them the opportunity to
		
00:22:20 --> 00:22:23
			make them feel that they have a choice.
		
00:22:23 --> 00:22:25
			It's it's just 2 approaches that achieve the
		
00:22:25 --> 00:22:27
			same thing. Yeah. But one may be more
		
00:22:27 --> 00:22:28
			effective than than the other. Mhmm.
		
00:22:29 --> 00:22:31
			So so so I don't I don't think
		
00:22:31 --> 00:22:33
			she's she's she actually she's actually saying don't
		
00:22:34 --> 00:22:35
			do this, that, and the other. She's just
		
00:22:35 --> 00:22:37
			saying do what you wanna do, but in
		
00:22:37 --> 00:22:39
			a more effective way. Now that aims that
		
00:22:39 --> 00:22:41
			even just today, actually, one one brother,
		
00:22:42 --> 00:22:43
			called me because I'm trying to help him
		
00:22:43 --> 00:22:45
			and his wife sort their situation out. And
		
00:22:45 --> 00:22:45
			is working.
		
00:22:46 --> 00:22:46
			But,
		
00:22:47 --> 00:22:49
			I just basically told both him and his
		
00:22:49 --> 00:22:51
			wife, you both are maniacs, I said to
		
00:22:51 --> 00:22:52
			them, because
		
00:22:53 --> 00:22:54
			you you you're basically
		
00:22:54 --> 00:22:57
			at each other's throats Oh. Trying to command
		
00:22:57 --> 00:22:59
			the armor to do x, y, and zed,
		
00:22:59 --> 00:23:01
			but realizing that it's not effective.
		
00:23:02 --> 00:23:04
			You're doing it one way, and it's not
		
00:23:04 --> 00:23:06
			working. She's doing it her way, and it's
		
00:23:06 --> 00:23:08
			not working. So why don't you just try
		
00:23:08 --> 00:23:11
			another way? Yeah. And, they've I managed to
		
00:23:11 --> 00:23:13
			get them to try another way. And then
		
00:23:13 --> 00:23:15
			called me today saying, it's been a week
		
00:23:15 --> 00:23:16
			and a half, and it's working.
		
00:23:18 --> 00:23:20
			And he's like, but this but that's it,
		
00:23:20 --> 00:23:21
			bro. All this but you're doing, you're trying
		
00:23:21 --> 00:23:23
			to go back to your old ways. Don't
		
00:23:23 --> 00:23:24
			do it that way. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
		
00:23:25 --> 00:23:27
			Just work with me. Stick to the plan.
		
00:23:28 --> 00:23:31
			Do I think I mentioned today as example.
		
00:23:31 --> 00:23:32
			I mentioned today that,
		
00:23:33 --> 00:23:34
			but why is why is isn't she doing
		
00:23:34 --> 00:23:36
			this? Why isn't she doing that? I'm telling
		
00:23:36 --> 00:23:36
			you,
		
00:23:37 --> 00:23:38
			if you
		
00:23:38 --> 00:23:39
			fulfill this role
		
00:23:40 --> 00:23:42
			and and and succeed at making her happy,
		
00:23:42 --> 00:23:43
			being a wife,
		
00:23:43 --> 00:23:45
			I can almost guarantee she would do what
		
00:23:45 --> 00:23:46
			you want her to do while you're asking
		
00:23:46 --> 00:23:48
			because she wants to make you happy. Yeah.
		
00:23:49 --> 00:23:50
			She will find ways and see you how
		
00:23:50 --> 00:23:52
			you become how what makes you happy, and
		
00:23:52 --> 00:23:53
			she will do that to make you happy.
		
00:23:53 --> 00:23:54
			Yeah. But as long as you're at each
		
00:23:54 --> 00:23:56
			other's throats, she's not gonna do that. No.
		
00:23:56 --> 00:23:57
			Even if you tell her to do it.
		
00:23:58 --> 00:23:58
			So,
		
00:23:59 --> 00:24:00
			so, basically, I said something some more something
		
00:24:00 --> 00:24:02
			as smaller, is that easy? And he they
		
00:24:02 --> 00:24:03
			said to me
		
00:24:03 --> 00:24:05
			actually, what he said is quite true because
		
00:24:05 --> 00:24:07
			since we had that meeting,
		
00:24:07 --> 00:24:08
			every day when he come back from work,
		
00:24:08 --> 00:24:09
			she makes some tea, and he let she
		
00:24:09 --> 00:24:12
			knows it. You know? And she he loves
		
00:24:12 --> 00:24:12
			tea.
		
00:24:12 --> 00:24:15
			I said, great. That's the first step. Now
		
00:24:15 --> 00:24:16
			your step is
		
00:24:16 --> 00:24:17
			gratitude.
		
00:24:19 --> 00:24:20
			If she's making you tea, you need to
		
00:24:20 --> 00:24:23
			exaggerate your happiness. Oh, yeah. Because you're now
		
00:24:23 --> 00:24:24
			reinforcing
		
00:24:24 --> 00:24:26
			Yeah. That's that's exactly what I said. I
		
00:24:26 --> 00:24:27
			said exaggerate
		
00:24:28 --> 00:24:30
			your happiness even if you're not that happy,
		
00:24:30 --> 00:24:32
			even tea is watery and or milky on
		
00:24:32 --> 00:24:34
			the other eye like it, make her feel
		
00:24:34 --> 00:24:34
			happy
		
00:24:35 --> 00:24:37
			for doing it because then she'll say, oh,
		
00:24:37 --> 00:24:39
			great. Is what makes me happy, and she'll
		
00:24:39 --> 00:24:41
			do it further. So you can achieve what
		
00:24:41 --> 00:24:42
			you want to achieve
		
00:24:42 --> 00:24:44
			without saying, I want tea.
		
00:24:46 --> 00:24:48
			So that's basically this is why I'm saying
		
00:24:48 --> 00:24:50
			that when it comes to marriage, back to
		
00:24:50 --> 00:24:52
			the our initial discussion about marriage,
		
00:24:53 --> 00:24:54
			people go into marriage
		
00:24:54 --> 00:24:56
			with wrong expectations, and it's not their fault.
		
00:24:56 --> 00:24:57
			And I would say to you, it's not
		
00:24:57 --> 00:24:59
			their fault. Why is it not their fault?
		
00:25:00 --> 00:25:02
			Why is it not their fault? Because they've
		
00:25:02 --> 00:25:03
			never been married before.
		
00:25:03 --> 00:25:06
			I mean, you're expected to perform a role
		
00:25:06 --> 00:25:08
			you've never done before.
		
00:25:08 --> 00:25:10
			So both of you,
		
00:25:10 --> 00:25:13
			generally speaking, are figuring it out as you
		
00:25:13 --> 00:25:14
			go along.
		
00:25:14 --> 00:25:15
			And that means
		
00:25:16 --> 00:25:18
			it's gonna take a very long time before
		
00:25:18 --> 00:25:19
			you've you've got a working plan.
		
00:25:22 --> 00:25:24
			You know what I like about that approach?
		
00:25:27 --> 00:25:30
			It's a it's a humble approach. You
		
00:25:32 --> 00:25:33
			know? It's going to be okay.
		
00:25:34 --> 00:25:35
			We're going to work at it.
		
00:25:35 --> 00:25:37
			We're probably going to mess up along the
		
00:25:37 --> 00:25:39
			way. I'm gonna mess up for sure. You're
		
00:25:39 --> 00:25:42
			probably gonna mess up. But we're committing to
		
00:25:42 --> 00:25:43
			making this work,
		
00:25:44 --> 00:25:44
			which is
		
00:25:45 --> 00:25:48
			so different, I think, from, like you said,
		
00:25:48 --> 00:25:48
			the expectation.
		
00:25:49 --> 00:25:50
			And I think,
		
00:25:51 --> 00:25:53
			you know, I I think we have so
		
00:25:53 --> 00:25:55
			many layers of
		
00:25:55 --> 00:25:58
			ideas about what a relationship should look like.
		
00:25:58 --> 00:25:59
			And I I say
		
00:26:00 --> 00:26:02
			relationship on purpose because,
		
00:26:02 --> 00:26:04
			you know, and any, you know, viewers disagree
		
00:26:04 --> 00:26:06
			with me, you know, you can comment below,
		
00:26:06 --> 00:26:08
			call me out. But I think that what
		
00:26:08 --> 00:26:10
			we see all the time around us
		
00:26:11 --> 00:26:12
			in popular media,
		
00:26:12 --> 00:26:16
			in social media, popular culture, films, songs, everywhere
		
00:26:16 --> 00:26:17
			is relationships.
		
00:26:18 --> 00:26:20
			It's not marriage. Now you might say, Yeah,
		
00:26:20 --> 00:26:22
			but a marriage is a relationship, isn't it?
		
00:26:22 --> 00:26:24
			But I would say actually
		
00:26:24 --> 00:26:26
			a marriage is a lot bigger than a
		
00:26:26 --> 00:26:27
			relationship.
		
00:26:29 --> 00:26:31
			And you could have if
		
00:26:32 --> 00:26:34
			move halal and haram to the side. You
		
00:26:34 --> 00:26:37
			could have a ghiel and you you and
		
00:26:37 --> 00:26:39
			that girl you're like that. Your relationship is
		
00:26:39 --> 00:26:41
			great. It's fun. It's cool. You enjoy each
		
00:26:41 --> 00:26:43
			other's company. Everything's nice.
		
00:26:44 --> 00:26:45
			But the marriage part now
		
00:26:46 --> 00:26:48
			are you on the same page?
		
00:26:48 --> 00:26:50
			Does she want kids? Do you want kids?
		
00:26:50 --> 00:26:52
			Your families hate each other. You don't want
		
00:26:52 --> 00:26:53
			to live together. She doesn't want to live
		
00:26:53 --> 00:26:53
			here.
		
00:26:54 --> 00:26:55
			Now all the other elements
		
00:26:56 --> 00:26:58
			mean that a marriage would not work. So
		
00:26:58 --> 00:27:00
			while the relationship could be great, you guys
		
00:27:00 --> 00:27:03
			could kick it. A marriage may not work.
		
00:27:03 --> 00:27:04
			And so Because in marriage, you're you're building
		
00:27:04 --> 00:27:06
			and the relationship will be not necessarily building.
		
00:27:06 --> 00:27:09
			This is it. Relationship is is fun times.
		
00:27:09 --> 00:27:11
			Relationship is enjoyment. Yes. It's just enjoyment. Exactly.
		
00:27:11 --> 00:27:12
			But I think that
		
00:27:13 --> 00:27:15
			and, again, I I I say I say
		
00:27:15 --> 00:27:17
			this and open to for anybody to to
		
00:27:17 --> 00:27:19
			to to call me out,
		
00:27:19 --> 00:27:21
			but I think that what we are
		
00:27:21 --> 00:27:22
			bred for
		
00:27:22 --> 00:27:23
			is relationships
		
00:27:24 --> 00:27:26
			and not marriage. Because I know for a,
		
00:27:26 --> 00:27:28
			you know, a sister or a woman who
		
00:27:28 --> 00:27:30
			wants to get married, what's she looking for?
		
00:27:30 --> 00:27:32
			She's looking for a man to love her,
		
00:27:32 --> 00:27:34
			you know, to appreciate her. She wants the
		
00:27:34 --> 00:27:36
			romance. She wants to have the, you know,
		
00:27:36 --> 00:27:38
			the companionship and the relationship
		
00:27:39 --> 00:27:41
			aspect. She's very clear about that. She wants
		
00:27:41 --> 00:27:43
			to be in love. She wants to be
		
00:27:43 --> 00:27:46
			loved. The relationship is so crystal clear And
		
00:27:46 --> 00:27:48
			in her head, in order to have that
		
00:27:48 --> 00:27:50
			relationship, I need this, this, this, this, this,
		
00:27:50 --> 00:27:52
			this. These are these things that I need.
		
00:27:52 --> 00:27:54
			Right? Mhmm. Mhmm. But the actual
		
00:27:54 --> 00:27:55
			marriage
		
00:27:55 --> 00:27:58
			and the work of marriage and even the
		
00:27:58 --> 00:28:00
			ultimate purpose of marriage,
		
00:28:00 --> 00:28:02
			we are not bred on that. And it's
		
00:28:02 --> 00:28:05
			hardly I think it's hardly ever spoken about.
		
00:28:05 --> 00:28:07
			You know? Certainly, it's not what people love
		
00:28:07 --> 00:28:09
			to make poetry about. You know? The the
		
00:28:09 --> 00:28:09
			work of marriage,
		
00:28:10 --> 00:28:13
			apparently, it's not there. So Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
		
00:28:14 --> 00:28:15
			Yeah. I mean, like, the
		
00:28:16 --> 00:28:16
			it's,
		
00:28:17 --> 00:28:19
			basically, fixing things like duty,
		
00:28:20 --> 00:28:20
			possibilities.
		
00:28:21 --> 00:28:22
			These are
		
00:28:25 --> 00:28:27
			basically, I I I think, like like you
		
00:28:27 --> 00:28:30
			said, the the the the institutional marriage, I'll
		
00:28:30 --> 00:28:32
			and I'll only limit this to Muslims in
		
00:28:32 --> 00:28:34
			the west. Because I'm sure Muslims in Muslim
		
00:28:34 --> 00:28:36
			countries still have their culture that if they
		
00:28:36 --> 00:28:37
			fall back on. But at least Muslims in
		
00:28:37 --> 00:28:40
			western country who countries who are born and
		
00:28:40 --> 00:28:42
			raised and watch the same programs and TV
		
00:28:42 --> 00:28:43
			shows or not, are looking for what they
		
00:28:43 --> 00:28:44
			see on TV.
		
00:28:46 --> 00:28:47
			It's a very individualist,
		
00:28:47 --> 00:28:48
			selfish approach,
		
00:28:49 --> 00:28:51
			and you can see that manifest in the
		
00:28:51 --> 00:28:51
			way they
		
00:28:52 --> 00:28:54
			treat the children in that relationship. So I'll
		
00:28:54 --> 00:28:54
			give you example.
		
00:28:55 --> 00:28:57
			The cut the classic case, which is not
		
00:28:57 --> 00:28:59
			uncommon. I don't have to say I heard
		
00:28:59 --> 00:29:01
			or I speak. We all know of marriage
		
00:29:01 --> 00:29:03
			break apart, and then now the husband's not
		
00:29:03 --> 00:29:04
			not see his kid because why is not
		
00:29:04 --> 00:29:05
			a lamb city kid and that kind of
		
00:29:05 --> 00:29:08
			stuff. Now if you just sit back and
		
00:29:08 --> 00:29:11
			just ask some question, put aside why their
		
00:29:11 --> 00:29:13
			marriage broke apart and what kind of stuff.
		
00:29:13 --> 00:29:15
			The question is you have children.
		
00:29:15 --> 00:29:17
			This child is a combination of 2 people,
		
00:29:18 --> 00:29:20
			husband and wife, mom and dad.
		
00:29:20 --> 00:29:23
			There are responsibilities that are there that supersedes
		
00:29:23 --> 00:29:23
			the individual
		
00:29:24 --> 00:29:25
			mom and dad.
		
00:29:26 --> 00:29:29
			Possibilities that have to be fulfilled irregardless
		
00:29:29 --> 00:29:31
			of mom and dad's wishes.
		
00:29:31 --> 00:29:34
			Mhmm. But because we see so often
		
00:29:34 --> 00:29:36
			this disregard, it shows that they only care
		
00:29:36 --> 00:29:37
			about themself.
		
00:29:38 --> 00:29:40
			Mhmm. I mean, one brother told me, and
		
00:29:40 --> 00:29:42
			this is quite sad actually when I heard
		
00:29:42 --> 00:29:44
			about my days, that,
		
00:29:45 --> 00:29:46
			one parent
		
00:29:47 --> 00:29:49
			was so adamant not to give the
		
00:29:50 --> 00:29:52
			the child access to the file or give
		
00:29:52 --> 00:29:54
			the father access to the child. As she
		
00:29:54 --> 00:29:56
			told the child the the father is dead.
		
00:29:59 --> 00:30:01
			The father was shocked to find out when
		
00:30:01 --> 00:30:02
			he met his son. His son was surprised
		
00:30:02 --> 00:30:04
			he was still alive because he was told
		
00:30:04 --> 00:30:05
			he was dead.
		
00:30:06 --> 00:30:06
			Wow.
		
00:30:07 --> 00:30:08
			Now, again,
		
00:30:08 --> 00:30:10
			someone may say, yo. But maybe he was
		
00:30:10 --> 00:30:12
			this and maybe he was that. Again, all
		
00:30:12 --> 00:30:13
			this is irrelevant.
		
00:30:13 --> 00:30:16
			How he and her was to themselves is
		
00:30:16 --> 00:30:17
			one discussion.
		
00:30:17 --> 00:30:19
			Yeah. And they got divorced, and that's been
		
00:30:19 --> 00:30:21
			dealt with. Yeah. But now we have him
		
00:30:21 --> 00:30:23
			and his child. That's a different discussion.
		
00:30:23 --> 00:30:23
			Mhmm.
		
00:30:24 --> 00:30:25
			But this is my point. The point is
		
00:30:25 --> 00:30:26
			that we view
		
00:30:27 --> 00:30:28
			this responsibility
		
00:30:28 --> 00:30:29
			as something
		
00:30:30 --> 00:30:32
			for me, this is what I want. Who
		
00:30:32 --> 00:30:33
			cares what you want at the end of
		
00:30:33 --> 00:30:33
			the day?
		
00:30:34 --> 00:30:34
			Yeah.
		
00:30:35 --> 00:30:36
			And I I know those I don't I
		
00:30:36 --> 00:30:37
			don't I don't say this to belittle someone.
		
00:30:37 --> 00:30:39
			I mean, obviously, your feelings aren't important, just
		
00:30:39 --> 00:30:40
			like his feelings aren't important.
		
00:30:41 --> 00:30:43
			But do they supersede all other responsibilities?
		
00:30:46 --> 00:30:48
			No. No. No. No. It's it's, it's it's
		
00:30:48 --> 00:30:51
			literally what I'm seeing is even in the
		
00:30:51 --> 00:30:52
			non Muslim space,
		
00:30:54 --> 00:30:57
			people asking again, hold on a minute, what
		
00:30:57 --> 00:30:59
			was the purpose of marriage again?
		
00:31:00 --> 00:31:02
			What was that marriage thing all about? Because
		
00:31:02 --> 00:31:04
			what's going on now? This ain't it. You
		
00:31:04 --> 00:31:06
			know? Like, this this is this this ain't
		
00:31:06 --> 00:31:09
			it. You know? If marriages are going to
		
00:31:09 --> 00:31:11
			be based on, like you said,
		
00:31:11 --> 00:31:12
			individual fulfillment,
		
00:31:13 --> 00:31:14
			feelings,
		
00:31:15 --> 00:31:15
			emotions,
		
00:31:16 --> 00:31:18
			how how much you're vibing in that period
		
00:31:18 --> 00:31:19
			of life or whatever,
		
00:31:20 --> 00:31:22
			they are necessarily going to be short lived.
		
00:31:23 --> 00:31:26
			They they're they're going to be breaking up
		
00:31:26 --> 00:31:28
			and children at the end of the day
		
00:31:28 --> 00:31:29
			I don't know what you feel about this,
		
00:31:29 --> 00:31:30
			but
		
00:31:31 --> 00:31:33
			for me, when it comes to growing adult,
		
00:31:33 --> 00:31:35
			you guys do whatever you want. Yeah? You
		
00:31:35 --> 00:31:36
			want to get together? You want to be
		
00:31:36 --> 00:31:37
			together for 2 years? You want to break
		
00:31:37 --> 00:31:38
			up and marry
		
00:31:40 --> 00:31:41
			someone else. It's sad that, like, do whatever
		
00:31:41 --> 00:31:42
			you want. But the children,
		
00:31:44 --> 00:31:47
			that's that's the that's the issue. The children.
		
00:31:47 --> 00:31:49
			So thing is that that psychology,
		
00:31:49 --> 00:31:51
			that individualist selfish psychology,
		
00:31:52 --> 00:31:54
			won't impart upon the children. They'll see that
		
00:31:54 --> 00:31:55
			this is how they'll grow up in, oh,
		
00:31:55 --> 00:31:56
			this is how marriage is. If they're not
		
00:31:56 --> 00:31:58
			happy, then this is how they must behave
		
00:31:58 --> 00:31:59
			and whatnot. I mean, the way the way
		
00:31:59 --> 00:32:00
			I view marriage,
		
00:32:01 --> 00:32:04
			my analogy will be 2 rocks.
		
00:32:05 --> 00:32:06
			You got 2 rocks,
		
00:32:07 --> 00:32:08
			and they're rubbing against each other.
		
00:32:10 --> 00:32:12
			Now, obviously, these rocks weren't made to rub
		
00:32:12 --> 00:32:13
			against each other. They were they were they
		
00:32:14 --> 00:32:15
			they're just 2 individual rocks. So there there's
		
00:32:15 --> 00:32:16
			a lot of friction. There's a lot of
		
00:32:16 --> 00:32:18
			noise. There's a lot of, you know, heat.
		
00:32:19 --> 00:32:20
			But over time,
		
00:32:20 --> 00:32:22
			these surface would smoothen off.
		
00:32:22 --> 00:32:24
			Eventually, they'll become
		
00:32:24 --> 00:32:25
			flat surfaces
		
00:32:25 --> 00:32:26
			on each other.
		
00:32:27 --> 00:32:29
			This is how marriage is. There's a lot
		
00:32:29 --> 00:32:29
			of friction.
		
00:32:30 --> 00:32:32
			He's he's this way. She's that way. I
		
00:32:32 --> 00:32:33
			don't get it. Blah blah blah. But
		
00:32:34 --> 00:32:36
			if you recognize that over time,
		
00:32:36 --> 00:32:38
			these will smoothen off
		
00:32:38 --> 00:32:40
			Wow. As your character will not in inadvertently
		
00:32:40 --> 00:32:41
			change.
		
00:32:41 --> 00:32:43
			Eventually, you get to a point whereby
		
00:32:44 --> 00:32:45
			you can't imagine life without each other because
		
00:32:45 --> 00:32:47
			you've you've you've become the same shape now.
		
00:32:47 --> 00:32:50
			You've become you fit. You've cleaved. But it's
		
00:32:50 --> 00:32:51
			about get it's about getting that way. It's
		
00:32:51 --> 00:32:54
			It's about getting from that rough surface to
		
00:32:54 --> 00:32:56
			that smooth surface takes a very long time.
		
00:32:56 --> 00:32:57
			And the reason why it takes a long
		
00:32:57 --> 00:32:58
			time is because there's so many things that
		
00:32:58 --> 00:33:00
			got to happen. You got to have children.
		
00:33:00 --> 00:33:03
			You got to wean those children. You have
		
00:33:03 --> 00:33:05
			to raise those children. You have to educate
		
00:33:05 --> 00:33:06
			those children. They have to go to secondary
		
00:33:06 --> 00:33:09
			school. Now they become adults. All these events
		
00:33:09 --> 00:33:11
			throughout your life will shape how you decide,
		
00:33:11 --> 00:33:12
			how you talk, how you behave.
		
00:33:13 --> 00:33:14
			I mean,
		
00:33:15 --> 00:33:17
			anyone who's been married for longer than 10
		
00:33:17 --> 00:33:18
			years will recognize
		
00:33:18 --> 00:33:20
			how they were at the beginning is not
		
00:33:20 --> 00:33:22
			how they are now. Mhmm. And how they
		
00:33:22 --> 00:33:23
			are now is not how they will be
		
00:33:23 --> 00:33:25
			in 10 years' time. Mhmm. So if you
		
00:33:25 --> 00:33:27
			recognize that you're gonna change,
		
00:33:28 --> 00:33:30
			make that change a positive way so that
		
00:33:30 --> 00:33:32
			you're changing for the benefit of this thing
		
00:33:32 --> 00:33:34
			you're trying to build. Unit. This unit. Right.
		
00:33:34 --> 00:33:37
			Exactly. The the unit. The unit. And not
		
00:33:37 --> 00:33:39
			just change and the thing is what's good
		
00:33:39 --> 00:33:41
			about this is that you're not trying to
		
00:33:41 --> 00:33:44
			change necessarily change them. They will change. Mhmm.
		
00:33:44 --> 00:33:46
			But you need to focus on changing you,
		
00:33:46 --> 00:33:47
			how you're gonna change. And this is what
		
00:33:47 --> 00:33:49
			the issue is. When you're individualist,
		
00:33:50 --> 00:33:52
			is that why aren't you changing? Why aren't
		
00:33:52 --> 00:33:54
			you doing x, y, zed? Why aren't you
		
00:33:54 --> 00:33:56
			working harder? Why aren't you trying to be
		
00:33:56 --> 00:33:58
			home early? Why aren't you trying to make
		
00:33:58 --> 00:33:59
			sure you don't
		
00:33:59 --> 00:34:01
			burn the or whatever?
		
00:34:01 --> 00:34:01
			But
		
00:34:02 --> 00:34:04
			the question is, what are you doing to
		
00:34:04 --> 00:34:06
			make the marriage work, and what are you
		
00:34:06 --> 00:34:08
			doing to fix things? I mean, this you
		
00:34:08 --> 00:34:10
			get what I'm saying? So Yeah. Anyway, I'm
		
00:34:10 --> 00:34:11
			going on about the same thing. But that's
		
00:34:11 --> 00:34:13
			basically why why I believe
		
00:34:13 --> 00:34:15
			that is that, generally speaking, all marriages have
		
00:34:15 --> 00:34:16
			the potential
		
00:34:17 --> 00:34:18
			to work
		
00:34:18 --> 00:34:21
			if one's willing to make it work. And
		
00:34:21 --> 00:34:23
			I don't really believe that something is really,
		
00:34:23 --> 00:34:25
			really at the end. Really. I mean, I've
		
00:34:25 --> 00:34:27
			have had people sometimes say, oh, I wanna
		
00:34:27 --> 00:34:29
			divorce. I can't tell this person. No. No.
		
00:34:29 --> 00:34:30
			It's the end of the world. This person
		
00:34:30 --> 00:34:32
			is so he's a narcissist. He's a this.
		
00:34:32 --> 00:34:34
			He's a that. I said, cool.
		
00:34:35 --> 00:34:37
			After about a probably an hour of chatting,
		
00:34:38 --> 00:34:39
			you and you scratch the surface. You realize,
		
00:34:39 --> 00:34:41
			wait. If this person
		
00:34:41 --> 00:34:43
			wants to work hard enough and blah, would
		
00:34:43 --> 00:34:44
			you go back with them?
		
00:34:45 --> 00:34:47
			No. I would think, yeah, I probably would.
		
00:34:47 --> 00:34:48
			But therefore, it wasn't that bad then, isn't
		
00:34:48 --> 00:34:49
			it? I mean, you still have fingers then.
		
00:34:49 --> 00:34:51
			You still will make it try. So it's
		
00:34:51 --> 00:34:53
			just about making the effort.
		
00:34:55 --> 00:34:56
			I'm married to a narcissist
		
00:34:57 --> 00:34:58
			or I escaped
		
00:34:58 --> 00:34:59
			a narcissist.
		
00:35:00 --> 00:35:01
			I don't know how many times I've heard
		
00:35:01 --> 00:35:02
			that expression,
		
00:35:03 --> 00:35:04
			in It's a it's a buzzword at the
		
00:35:04 --> 00:35:07
			moment. What's happening? Like, what what what's going
		
00:35:07 --> 00:35:09
			on with all these narcissists coming around? Is
		
00:35:09 --> 00:35:11
			a is a real thing. Narcissism is a
		
00:35:11 --> 00:35:13
			real thing. Yeah. But ironically
		
00:35:14 --> 00:35:14
			Mhmm. Ironically,
		
00:35:15 --> 00:35:17
			I learned about narcissism
		
00:35:17 --> 00:35:19
			from a documentary that's on channel 4. This
		
00:35:19 --> 00:35:20
			was long time ago.
		
00:35:21 --> 00:35:22
			Probably in 2020,
		
00:35:22 --> 00:35:25
			2010, because I ain't seen anything on channel
		
00:35:25 --> 00:35:26
			4 for for almost a decade. It must
		
00:35:26 --> 00:35:27
			be about about a time.
		
00:35:28 --> 00:35:29
			But it was something on channel doc doc
		
00:35:30 --> 00:35:32
			documentation on channel 4 about an actual clinical
		
00:35:33 --> 00:35:33
			narcissist.
		
00:35:34 --> 00:35:36
			And would you believe he was married?
		
00:35:37 --> 00:35:39
			Oh, I can believe that. I can believe
		
00:35:39 --> 00:35:42
			that. I mean, happily married. As in Oh.
		
00:35:42 --> 00:35:43
			She was happy to stay with him and
		
00:35:43 --> 00:35:44
			she I mean, he was he was he
		
00:35:44 --> 00:35:46
			was. I mean, when they was filming, he
		
00:35:46 --> 00:35:47
			was an hour long documentary. It was a
		
00:35:47 --> 00:35:48
			pretty interesting to see how it was. And
		
00:35:48 --> 00:35:51
			and describing what an artist actually looks like,
		
00:35:51 --> 00:35:52
			it was interesting for me because
		
00:35:53 --> 00:35:54
			it's it's
		
00:35:54 --> 00:35:55
			it's like a coldness,
		
00:35:56 --> 00:35:59
			but innocence and coldness as in it's like,
		
00:35:59 --> 00:36:00
			he doesn't recognize his coldness. He would just
		
00:36:00 --> 00:36:02
			say it's in you know, I think an
		
00:36:02 --> 00:36:04
			example of saying something like she was she
		
00:36:04 --> 00:36:04
			gave an example, like,
		
00:36:05 --> 00:36:07
			like, if if he if she made bad
		
00:36:07 --> 00:36:08
			food, he would just say, this is terrible.
		
00:36:08 --> 00:36:09
			What kind of food is this?
		
00:36:10 --> 00:36:12
			But it's because he's unfeeling
		
00:36:12 --> 00:36:15
			of anything anyone around him. He doesn't even
		
00:36:15 --> 00:36:17
			recognize that it's even hurtful. It's like,
		
00:36:17 --> 00:36:19
			she has she's she's come to acknowledge that
		
00:36:19 --> 00:36:20
			this is just him.
		
00:36:21 --> 00:36:22
			It's not that
		
00:36:22 --> 00:36:24
			he's a evil person.
		
00:36:24 --> 00:36:26
			Mhmm. He said this this is his
		
00:36:26 --> 00:36:27
			his
		
00:36:27 --> 00:36:30
			mental makeup. He is he has an inability
		
00:36:30 --> 00:36:31
			to recognize
		
00:36:32 --> 00:36:34
			the impact of his what he says on
		
00:36:34 --> 00:36:34
			other people.
		
00:36:35 --> 00:36:37
			For him, it's just the facts. I mean,
		
00:36:37 --> 00:36:38
			this is terrible. What's wrong with what's wrong
		
00:36:38 --> 00:36:40
			with saying is terrible? He he is unable
		
00:36:40 --> 00:36:42
			to do it. But the point isn't that.
		
00:36:42 --> 00:36:43
			The point is
		
00:36:43 --> 00:36:45
			to recognize his faults Mhmm. But loves him
		
00:36:45 --> 00:36:47
			for what he's good at.
		
00:36:47 --> 00:36:47
			Right.
		
00:36:48 --> 00:36:50
			This is interesting because as you said, evil
		
00:36:50 --> 00:36:53
			person, and I do think that narcissism
		
00:36:53 --> 00:36:55
			in this time is like code word for
		
00:36:55 --> 00:36:57
			evil. I was married to a narcissist.
		
00:36:58 --> 00:37:00
			Ergo, he was an evil man. He was
		
00:37:00 --> 00:37:01
			a bad guy.
		
00:37:02 --> 00:37:05
			Interesting. Interesting. Honestly, the the joke because I'll
		
00:37:05 --> 00:37:07
			I'll just one quick quick quick point about
		
00:37:07 --> 00:37:08
			it. I mean, if someone comes to you
		
00:37:08 --> 00:37:09
			in the future says, oh, I'm a nerd
		
00:37:09 --> 00:37:11
			and narcissist. Maybe just ask them. Okay.
		
00:37:12 --> 00:37:13
			What made him that way?
		
00:37:15 --> 00:37:15
			Meaning,
		
00:37:15 --> 00:37:17
			sometimes because I said, the reason I say
		
00:37:17 --> 00:37:19
			that question is important is because sometimes people,
		
00:37:19 --> 00:37:20
			they fail
		
00:37:21 --> 00:37:22
			to ask that question. Like I said it
		
00:37:22 --> 00:37:26
			before, what have they contributed to that? Oh,
		
00:37:26 --> 00:37:28
			okay. I see. Oh, how okay. That's what
		
00:37:28 --> 00:37:28
			you mean. I didn't I thought you meant
		
00:37:28 --> 00:37:29
			childhood or the way that he was raised
		
00:37:29 --> 00:37:30
			or something like that.
		
00:37:30 --> 00:37:32
			No. No. No. As in let me give
		
00:37:32 --> 00:37:33
			you example.
		
00:37:35 --> 00:37:36
			I'll give this one one one,
		
00:37:37 --> 00:37:39
			example. Trying to think of an example that
		
00:37:39 --> 00:37:40
			is not so specific that
		
00:37:41 --> 00:37:43
			that that person might might watch this and
		
00:37:43 --> 00:37:44
			say, oh, wait. Why are you telling me
		
00:37:44 --> 00:37:44
			my stories?
		
00:37:45 --> 00:37:47
			Okay. Let me give you examples. Like,
		
00:37:48 --> 00:37:49
			some might have an argument
		
00:37:51 --> 00:37:52
			with their husband,
		
00:37:52 --> 00:37:54
			and they said x y zed. And I
		
00:37:54 --> 00:37:56
			said, well, I can't understand why this way.
		
00:37:57 --> 00:37:59
			And I think oh, what's the matter, dude?
		
00:37:59 --> 00:38:00
			Something happened just the other day with another
		
00:38:00 --> 00:38:01
			couple that called me up. So they had
		
00:38:01 --> 00:38:02
			an argument,
		
00:38:04 --> 00:38:05
			or something like that, and and then they
		
00:38:05 --> 00:38:07
			said, oh, look. I even praised the person.
		
00:38:07 --> 00:38:07
			And, I mean, you know, I don't see
		
00:38:07 --> 00:38:09
			why he's behaving, so I even praised them
		
00:38:09 --> 00:38:10
			and I tried to compliment them. I said
		
00:38:10 --> 00:38:11
			to them, you know,
		
00:38:12 --> 00:38:13
			the word they used was,
		
00:38:14 --> 00:38:15
			you know, you could be so nice, but
		
00:38:15 --> 00:38:17
			this time that this this the the other
		
00:38:17 --> 00:38:18
			day, you did this this this this this
		
00:38:18 --> 00:38:19
			new. It was so nice when you did
		
00:38:19 --> 00:38:20
			this.
		
00:38:20 --> 00:38:22
			I said, but that's not a phrase. That's
		
00:38:22 --> 00:38:23
			a that's a that's a that's a cuss.
		
00:38:23 --> 00:38:25
			She said, how's it cuss? I praised him.
		
00:38:25 --> 00:38:26
			No. You phrased it as
		
00:38:27 --> 00:38:28
			you was this way.
		
00:38:29 --> 00:38:30
			That's a backhanded
		
00:38:31 --> 00:38:32
			compliment if I've ever heard one.
		
00:38:32 --> 00:38:33
			Yeah. Because
		
00:38:33 --> 00:38:34
			it is a compliment,
		
00:38:35 --> 00:38:37
			but, really, it's a dig because Yeah. You're
		
00:38:37 --> 00:38:39
			not this way now, and you could be
		
00:38:39 --> 00:38:41
			this way. But you get what I'm saying?
		
00:38:41 --> 00:38:44
			And that triggered him to react the way
		
00:38:44 --> 00:38:46
			he did. So I although his behavior was
		
00:38:46 --> 00:38:48
			incorrect and it was wrong and he admitted
		
00:38:48 --> 00:38:48
			that,
		
00:38:49 --> 00:38:51
			what she'd felt to realize that she triggered
		
00:38:51 --> 00:38:52
			that behavior.
		
00:38:54 --> 00:38:56
			So it's not to blame her or to
		
00:38:56 --> 00:38:58
			blame him. It's the it's the thing is
		
00:38:58 --> 00:38:58
			that
		
00:38:59 --> 00:39:00
			it's that we my married couple need to
		
00:39:00 --> 00:39:02
			recognize that both
		
00:39:02 --> 00:39:04
			are are to blame for what happens, not
		
00:39:04 --> 00:39:05
			just one side. It's not like one person
		
00:39:05 --> 00:39:07
			is, oh, I'm so nice, and I'm so
		
00:39:07 --> 00:39:09
			happy, and I've done everything for you. And
		
00:39:09 --> 00:39:10
			he's like, I'm a monster. I'm a monster.
		
00:39:10 --> 00:39:12
			It it isn't it doesn't who do you
		
00:39:12 --> 00:39:14
			mean I function that way? How do you
		
00:39:14 --> 00:39:15
			function that way?
		
00:39:17 --> 00:39:19
			I wonder whether there is room
		
00:39:19 --> 00:39:20
			to acknowledge
		
00:39:23 --> 00:39:23
			somebody's
		
00:39:24 --> 00:39:24
			contribution
		
00:39:25 --> 00:39:26
			to a bad situation
		
00:39:27 --> 00:39:29
			without being accused of, like, victim shaming
		
00:39:30 --> 00:39:32
			and and those types of of
		
00:39:32 --> 00:39:34
			How do you mean? Explain that. How do
		
00:39:34 --> 00:39:36
			you mean? Okay. So you said in that
		
00:39:36 --> 00:39:39
			situation that she said something that triggered him
		
00:39:39 --> 00:39:41
			to do x, y, z. And I know
		
00:39:41 --> 00:39:43
			that, you know, in another context, somebody said,
		
00:39:43 --> 00:39:45
			Oh, but you're blaming her now. You're making
		
00:39:45 --> 00:39:48
			her responsible for his bad behavior. You're victim
		
00:39:48 --> 00:39:50
			shaming or victim blaming. Right?
		
00:39:51 --> 00:39:52
			You're putting the onus on her when he's
		
00:39:52 --> 00:39:54
			the one who's in the wrong.
		
00:39:54 --> 00:39:55
			And I get that,
		
00:39:56 --> 00:39:57
			but I'm this is why I'm asking the
		
00:39:57 --> 00:39:59
			question. Can we be
		
00:40:00 --> 00:40:02
			mature enough to realize that
		
00:40:03 --> 00:40:05
			we do all co create situations?
		
00:40:06 --> 00:40:08
			We have a part to play. Even if
		
00:40:09 --> 00:40:12
			you bear the brunt of the situation,
		
00:40:12 --> 00:40:14
			you get the hard end of the stick,
		
00:40:14 --> 00:40:16
			right? Basically, you suffer as a result of
		
00:40:16 --> 00:40:17
			the thing that was triggered.
		
00:40:18 --> 00:40:20
			That doesn't mean that you may not have
		
00:40:20 --> 00:40:21
			played a part in it. Does that make
		
00:40:21 --> 00:40:22
			sense? Yeah.
		
00:40:22 --> 00:40:24
			I mean, the the best example I could
		
00:40:24 --> 00:40:25
			think of will be I mean, the best
		
00:40:25 --> 00:40:27
			thing to start off with this conversation is
		
00:40:27 --> 00:40:29
			that often and this happens a lot. I've
		
00:40:29 --> 00:40:32
			discussed this issue thousands of times. People bring
		
00:40:32 --> 00:40:33
			examples
		
00:40:34 --> 00:40:36
			whereby it's entirely his fault, obviously. Oh, yeah.
		
00:40:36 --> 00:40:37
			Something which is,
		
00:40:38 --> 00:40:38
			for example,
		
00:40:39 --> 00:40:42
			extreme domestic violence. For example, he comes home,
		
00:40:42 --> 00:40:44
			black and blue, hospitalization on a regular basis,
		
00:40:44 --> 00:40:45
			that kind of stuff.
		
00:40:46 --> 00:40:47
			But the problem with those examples is that
		
00:40:47 --> 00:40:48
			those are rarities.
		
00:40:49 --> 00:40:50
			That is not the actually the norm.
		
00:40:51 --> 00:40:52
			And let me give you a snide about
		
00:40:52 --> 00:40:53
			my own self. Yeah?
		
00:40:54 --> 00:40:55
			On how
		
00:40:56 --> 00:40:56
			scenarios
		
00:40:58 --> 00:40:58
			are really
		
00:40:59 --> 00:40:59
			one-sided.
		
00:41:01 --> 00:41:03
			So one time this happened months ago, but
		
00:41:04 --> 00:41:05
			I I I like to bring up because
		
00:41:05 --> 00:41:07
			it doesn't show it does show how perspective
		
00:41:07 --> 00:41:10
			is so important when it comes to dealing
		
00:41:10 --> 00:41:10
			with issues.
		
00:41:12 --> 00:41:14
			So one time, I said to my son
		
00:41:14 --> 00:41:15
			he was playing Minecraft
		
00:41:16 --> 00:41:17
			on PlayStation.
		
00:41:17 --> 00:41:18
			I said, turn the TV up. We're gonna
		
00:41:18 --> 00:41:20
			pray. Sorry. Sorry. I didn't tell him to
		
00:41:20 --> 00:41:21
			turn it off. I turned it off. I
		
00:41:21 --> 00:41:22
			said, we're gonna pray, and let's pray.
		
00:41:23 --> 00:41:24
			So in my mind,
		
00:41:24 --> 00:41:27
			TV is off. Game is there. Let's focus
		
00:41:27 --> 00:41:28
			on Salah.
		
00:41:29 --> 00:41:29
			You know, straightforward.
		
00:41:31 --> 00:41:33
			And then he I put the remote control
		
00:41:33 --> 00:41:33
			down,
		
00:41:34 --> 00:41:35
			and then he picked it up and turned
		
00:41:35 --> 00:41:36
			it back on.
		
00:41:36 --> 00:41:36
			Oh.
		
00:41:38 --> 00:41:40
			I mean, that's your reaction. Oh, I mean,
		
00:41:40 --> 00:41:41
			what's what's going on with that? And that
		
00:41:41 --> 00:41:43
			was my reaction. Probably, more extreme. I'm like,
		
00:41:43 --> 00:41:45
			what the heck is going on?
		
00:41:46 --> 00:41:48
			So my only reaction was,
		
00:41:49 --> 00:41:50
			oh, is that how it's going on now?
		
00:41:50 --> 00:41:51
			So I got I I I went to
		
00:41:51 --> 00:41:54
			the PlayStation, and I plugged it out. I
		
00:41:54 --> 00:41:56
			said, we're going to pray. Turn it off.
		
00:41:58 --> 00:41:59
			You know,
		
00:42:00 --> 00:42:00
			boundaries.
		
00:42:01 --> 00:42:03
			Dad, turn the TV off. Let's pray. Don't
		
00:42:03 --> 00:42:05
			go beyond the boundaries. Okay.
		
00:42:06 --> 00:42:07
			So
		
00:42:07 --> 00:42:08
			after that,
		
00:42:08 --> 00:42:10
			he was a bit vexed as as a
		
00:42:10 --> 00:42:12
			child would be. And fair enough. I mean,
		
00:42:12 --> 00:42:14
			I just I just manhandled you. Whatever, ain't
		
00:42:14 --> 00:42:16
			it? Yeah. But that persisted,
		
00:42:16 --> 00:42:18
			like, for weeks.
		
00:42:18 --> 00:42:20
			How? You mean vexed. And I'm like, how
		
00:42:20 --> 00:42:22
			dare you be vexed with me? I mean,
		
00:42:22 --> 00:42:24
			you're the one who want to keep that
		
00:42:24 --> 00:42:26
			in more control to disobey my my command.
		
00:42:26 --> 00:42:29
			Yeah. And then you're vexed with me. Mhmm.
		
00:42:30 --> 00:42:31
			So then I made a clear. I said,
		
00:42:31 --> 00:42:33
			your eye actually stinks. I mean, how dare
		
00:42:33 --> 00:42:35
			you treat your dad this way and blah
		
00:42:35 --> 00:42:36
			blah blah. You know?
		
00:42:36 --> 00:42:38
			I mean, you can understand this. I mean,
		
00:42:38 --> 00:42:40
			the the scenario is quite clear.
		
00:42:40 --> 00:42:41
			Yeah.
		
00:42:42 --> 00:42:45
			So, eventually, I'm telling my wife, look. This
		
00:42:45 --> 00:42:46
			boy, you yeah. Speak to him because I'm
		
00:42:46 --> 00:42:47
			gonna get I'm gonna get really upset. I'm
		
00:42:47 --> 00:42:49
			upset. Hey. What was he how how how
		
00:42:49 --> 00:42:50
			you treat your parents this way?
		
00:42:51 --> 00:42:54
			It turns out, though Mhmm. It turns out
		
00:42:54 --> 00:42:57
			that he didn't turn on the TV to
		
00:42:57 --> 00:42:59
			be disrespectful. He just wanted to shut down
		
00:42:59 --> 00:43:01
			the game then pray. So he just wanted
		
00:43:01 --> 00:43:02
			to quickly go, dog.
		
00:43:03 --> 00:43:05
			Run on what button, this button, shut down,
		
00:43:05 --> 00:43:07
			and then play. Yeah. So in his mind,
		
00:43:08 --> 00:43:10
			it wasn't disobedience. He was just trying to
		
00:43:10 --> 00:43:13
			complete what I was doing. Yeah. It just
		
00:43:13 --> 00:43:15
			happened that the way I saw it, it
		
00:43:15 --> 00:43:15
			was disrespectful.
		
00:43:18 --> 00:43:20
			Okay. So what's with the vexeness, though? What's
		
00:43:20 --> 00:43:21
			with the frustration towards you that for, like,
		
00:43:21 --> 00:43:23
			gone of weeks? Well,
		
00:43:23 --> 00:43:24
			it turns out
		
00:43:25 --> 00:43:27
			that this world that he was building
		
00:43:27 --> 00:43:28
			for months,
		
00:43:29 --> 00:43:31
			when I plugged it out, it deleted.
		
00:43:33 --> 00:43:34
			So he lost
		
00:43:35 --> 00:43:36
			his his game.
		
00:43:38 --> 00:43:39
			So this is why I was, like, saying,
		
00:43:39 --> 00:43:41
			you know, you should apologize for what he
		
00:43:41 --> 00:43:43
			did. I said, but I only plugged it
		
00:43:43 --> 00:43:45
			out because of what he did. It was
		
00:43:45 --> 00:43:46
			so if anyone's to blame, he said blame
		
00:43:46 --> 00:43:48
			himself. But the point here is not blame
		
00:43:48 --> 00:43:50
			or not blame. It isn't. Yeah. Here is
		
00:43:50 --> 00:43:52
			that there was this was actually a blameless
		
00:43:52 --> 00:43:52
			situation.
		
00:43:53 --> 00:43:53
			SubhanAllah.
		
00:43:54 --> 00:43:55
			Oh, no.
		
00:43:55 --> 00:43:57
			Poor thing. Ugh. I feel like it's a
		
00:43:58 --> 00:44:00
			Not for the self self sorry for him.
		
00:44:00 --> 00:44:02
			Whereas, initially, it was like It's true we
		
00:44:02 --> 00:44:04
			were caring about brother at the beginning. Right?
		
00:44:04 --> 00:44:06
			Now we're on the side of the kid.
		
00:44:06 --> 00:44:08
			No. We are team kid, team Minecraft kid.
		
00:44:08 --> 00:44:09
			So So
		
00:44:10 --> 00:44:11
			we can see here that this is a
		
00:44:11 --> 00:44:13
			scenario which I'm sure occurs all the time
		
00:44:13 --> 00:44:16
			in all scenarios, in all relationships where one
		
00:44:16 --> 00:44:18
			person does one thing. And in their perspective,
		
00:44:19 --> 00:44:20
			why are you behaving this way? Yeah. If
		
00:44:20 --> 00:44:22
			you just flip the script Yeah. And look
		
00:44:22 --> 00:44:24
			for another perspective, why are you behaving this
		
00:44:24 --> 00:44:27
			way? And there actually isn't a blame to
		
00:44:27 --> 00:44:29
			be put on anyone. It's just lack of
		
00:44:29 --> 00:44:29
			perspective.
		
00:44:30 --> 00:44:32
			Yeah. Yeah. And and I think as well,
		
00:44:32 --> 00:44:34
			Patricia. Yeah. I think I I totally agree
		
00:44:34 --> 00:44:36
			with you and I think, you know, sometimes
		
00:44:36 --> 00:44:37
			we can build
		
00:44:38 --> 00:44:41
			well, we tell a story, don't we, about
		
00:44:41 --> 00:44:42
			the people around us.
		
00:44:42 --> 00:44:44
			I think, you know, husbands can do it
		
00:44:44 --> 00:44:45
			for their wives and wives can do it
		
00:44:45 --> 00:44:47
			for their husbands and he's always like this,
		
00:44:47 --> 00:44:49
			he's always like that, he never does this,
		
00:44:49 --> 00:44:51
			he never does that. And then I believe
		
00:44:51 --> 00:44:52
			that
		
00:44:52 --> 00:44:54
			everything that we see,
		
00:44:54 --> 00:44:57
			we're filtering through the lens of, yeah, but
		
00:44:57 --> 00:45:00
			that's what he's like. So he does something
		
00:45:00 --> 00:45:02
			seemingly innocent or actually even a nice thing,
		
00:45:02 --> 00:45:04
			but because the story you're telling yourself is
		
00:45:04 --> 00:45:07
			that, well, he always does x y z,
		
00:45:07 --> 00:45:09
			it's just a confirmation of, well, you see,
		
00:45:09 --> 00:45:11
			he always does x y z. So
		
00:45:11 --> 00:45:12
			even people's
		
00:45:14 --> 00:45:14
			actions,
		
00:45:15 --> 00:45:18
			we don't just respond to the action. We
		
00:45:18 --> 00:45:19
			respond to our interpretation
		
00:45:20 --> 00:45:21
			of the meaning of the
		
00:45:22 --> 00:45:24
			action. Yep. And that's what we just said
		
00:45:24 --> 00:45:24
			there.
		
00:45:25 --> 00:45:26
			What you just said there,
		
00:45:28 --> 00:45:30
			it's really, really important. And this is one
		
00:45:30 --> 00:45:32
			of the things I mentioned, in my recent
		
00:45:32 --> 00:45:33
			videos about Redfield
		
00:45:34 --> 00:45:35
			is that it's to do framing.
		
00:45:36 --> 00:45:37
			How do you frame the situation?
		
00:45:38 --> 00:45:39
			So, for example,
		
00:45:39 --> 00:45:41
			one of the things the the most common
		
00:45:41 --> 00:45:43
			things that I mentioned about in Redfield,
		
00:45:43 --> 00:45:45
			ideology is that women are hypergamous. Those aren't
		
00:45:45 --> 00:45:46
			the best.
		
00:45:48 --> 00:45:49
			And there was a scenario, like, for if
		
00:45:49 --> 00:45:51
			a if a man who was practice 2
		
00:45:51 --> 00:45:52
			men are practicing, but one in the richer
		
00:45:52 --> 00:45:54
			than the other, who would you choose and
		
00:45:54 --> 00:45:55
			blah blah blah. That they're always framing that
		
00:45:55 --> 00:45:56
			in that scenario.
		
00:45:58 --> 00:46:01
			And the interpretation, the conclusion is that women
		
00:46:01 --> 00:46:02
			are hypergamous,
		
00:46:02 --> 00:46:05
			but that's according to a particular frame. Mhmm.
		
00:46:06 --> 00:46:07
			Let's we can look at the same scenario
		
00:46:08 --> 00:46:09
			Mhmm. From a different frame and have a
		
00:46:09 --> 00:46:11
			have a different and have a different,
		
00:46:11 --> 00:46:12
			interpretation.
		
00:46:12 --> 00:46:14
			So let's look at different interpretation.
		
00:46:15 --> 00:46:16
			Historically speaking,
		
00:46:17 --> 00:46:18
			of the men and women
		
00:46:18 --> 00:46:21
			out there who has generally had more money,
		
00:46:21 --> 00:46:23
			who has generally been more 6 more more
		
00:46:23 --> 00:46:26
			stronger, who has generally been, more dominant, and
		
00:46:26 --> 00:46:28
			that kind of stuff. As in the reason
		
00:46:28 --> 00:46:31
			why a woman may choose a stronger man
		
00:46:31 --> 00:46:33
			or a richer man because that was generally
		
00:46:33 --> 00:46:34
			what was there.
		
00:46:35 --> 00:46:37
			In a scenario whereby a woman is highly
		
00:46:37 --> 00:46:37
			successful
		
00:46:38 --> 00:46:39
			an husband, is
		
00:46:40 --> 00:46:42
			that necessarily what she's still gonna go for
		
00:46:42 --> 00:46:43
			all the time, or is or is she
		
00:46:43 --> 00:46:45
			okay marrying someone who maybe isn't as successful
		
00:46:45 --> 00:46:47
			as that? For example, if a woman was
		
00:46:47 --> 00:46:49
			a doctor and then really well as a
		
00:46:49 --> 00:46:51
			doctor and her husband was a chef,
		
00:46:51 --> 00:46:53
			chefs don't get paid as much as doctors.
		
00:46:53 --> 00:46:55
			Are you telling me that her husband she
		
00:46:55 --> 00:46:56
			won't marry a guy if he's a chef
		
00:46:56 --> 00:46:57
			because because she's a doctor?
		
00:46:58 --> 00:47:00
			If she gets along with him and she
		
00:47:00 --> 00:47:01
			loves him and she has affection for him,
		
00:47:01 --> 00:47:03
			will she is him being a chef really
		
00:47:03 --> 00:47:05
			gonna break the marriage down? It's the reframing.
		
00:47:07 --> 00:47:07
			But, again,
		
00:47:08 --> 00:47:10
			I wanna push back on that a little
		
00:47:10 --> 00:47:11
			bit. And then Go for it. Go for
		
00:47:11 --> 00:47:13
			it. Again, because everyone has a frame. Right?
		
00:47:13 --> 00:47:14
			So
		
00:47:14 --> 00:47:16
			if my frame
		
00:47:16 --> 00:47:17
			is
		
00:47:18 --> 00:47:19
			that I've reached a certain point in my
		
00:47:19 --> 00:47:21
			life me, I'm just any person,
		
00:47:21 --> 00:47:22
			miss blogs.
		
00:47:23 --> 00:47:25
			I've reached a certain point in my life
		
00:47:25 --> 00:47:25
			educationally,
		
00:47:26 --> 00:47:26
			financially,
		
00:47:27 --> 00:47:30
			you know, security wise, you know, profession etcetera
		
00:47:30 --> 00:47:30
			etcetera.
		
00:47:32 --> 00:47:35
			I cannot respect a man who is less
		
00:47:35 --> 00:47:37
			than me, who earns less than me, who
		
00:47:37 --> 00:47:40
			has less than I have And I deserve
		
00:47:40 --> 00:47:42
			someone who's on my level or higher. I
		
00:47:42 --> 00:47:44
			know that you're familiar with this because women
		
00:47:44 --> 00:47:46
			are constantly saying it.
		
00:47:46 --> 00:47:49
			Like, constantly saying it. And this is something
		
00:47:49 --> 00:47:52
			I don't understand. You know, my my message
		
00:47:52 --> 00:47:53
			to women right now,
		
00:47:54 --> 00:47:55
			please stop going on TikTok
		
00:47:55 --> 00:47:57
			and and just talking about
		
00:47:57 --> 00:47:59
			your madness because
		
00:47:59 --> 00:48:02
			it's just it's it's so embarrassing to just
		
00:48:02 --> 00:48:05
			see Yeah. Yeah. My sisters in womanhood, just
		
00:48:05 --> 00:48:05
			like
		
00:48:05 --> 00:48:07
			onto this social platform.
		
00:48:08 --> 00:48:10
			All your ridiculous demands,
		
00:48:11 --> 00:48:12
			your ridiculous expectations,
		
00:48:12 --> 00:48:13
			your arrogance,
		
00:48:14 --> 00:48:18
			your your conceit, your your meanness really, and
		
00:48:18 --> 00:48:22
			and disregard for for your basic respect and,
		
00:48:22 --> 00:48:25
			and just basic decency. I can't stand it.
		
00:48:25 --> 00:48:27
			I, I, I, I understand
		
00:48:28 --> 00:48:32
			why MGTOW is a thing because MGTOW feeds
		
00:48:32 --> 00:48:33
			on that stuff. So we've changed the subject
		
00:48:33 --> 00:48:35
			guys. We've gone on another one, something else
		
00:48:35 --> 00:48:35
			now.
		
00:48:37 --> 00:48:38
			But MGTOW,
		
00:48:39 --> 00:48:40
			men going their own way,
		
00:48:40 --> 00:48:42
			black pill, all of that,
		
00:48:43 --> 00:48:44
			they are framing.
		
00:48:44 --> 00:48:46
			They allow those women
		
00:48:47 --> 00:48:50
			and what those women say about men who
		
00:48:50 --> 00:48:50
			are broke,
		
00:48:51 --> 00:48:51
			dusties,
		
00:48:52 --> 00:48:52
			ugly,
		
00:48:53 --> 00:48:55
			ain't got no game, you know, all these,
		
00:48:55 --> 00:48:57
			you know, short, fat, whatever the case may
		
00:48:57 --> 00:48:59
			be, right? Losers, basically.
		
00:49:00 --> 00:49:00
			They allow
		
00:49:01 --> 00:49:03
			those women to to to be their frame.
		
00:49:04 --> 00:49:06
			So now they view the whole world through
		
00:49:06 --> 00:49:09
			the frame of Through that lens. Yeah. Women
		
00:49:09 --> 00:49:11
			won only the top 1%, the top 10%.
		
00:49:11 --> 00:49:13
			They every you know, they don't date under
		
00:49:13 --> 00:49:15
			6 foot and all of the data and
		
00:49:15 --> 00:49:16
			all of that
		
00:49:16 --> 00:49:19
			feeds into the paranoia and the, I'm sorry,
		
00:49:19 --> 00:49:20
			but the nihilism
		
00:49:20 --> 00:49:21
			of you
		
00:49:22 --> 00:49:23
			know, I am not select.
		
00:49:24 --> 00:49:26
			I am not in the top 10%. I'm
		
00:49:26 --> 00:49:29
			not a high value man. Therefore, what's the
		
00:49:29 --> 00:49:31
			point? All women are like this.
		
00:49:32 --> 00:49:33
			Shallow, vacuous,
		
00:49:33 --> 00:49:34
			vain,
		
00:49:35 --> 00:49:35
			demanding,
		
00:49:36 --> 00:49:38
			don't have bring anything to the table and
		
00:49:38 --> 00:49:39
			all of that because
		
00:49:40 --> 00:49:41
			ladies, that's what y'all putting out on social
		
00:49:41 --> 00:49:43
			media, and they just make videos of it.
		
00:49:44 --> 00:49:45
			But anyway But that's the thing is, when
		
00:49:45 --> 00:49:48
			they say women are like this, the question
		
00:49:48 --> 00:49:49
			I say is, is that due to her
		
00:49:49 --> 00:49:52
			innate nature or due to her nurture?
		
00:49:52 --> 00:49:55
			Very good point. Very, very good point.
		
00:49:56 --> 00:49:57
			From what I there was one there was
		
00:49:57 --> 00:49:59
			one really good video I stumbled across which
		
00:49:59 --> 00:50:01
			was, you know, those those feeds on YouTube
		
00:50:01 --> 00:50:03
			where you just click on it. So one
		
00:50:03 --> 00:50:04
			guy wants to compare
		
00:50:05 --> 00:50:07
			the desires of women for men or what
		
00:50:07 --> 00:50:08
			they want in a man Yeah. Women in
		
00:50:08 --> 00:50:10
			the west are women from the east, and
		
00:50:10 --> 00:50:11
			he chose Philippine Philippines.
		
00:50:12 --> 00:50:14
			It was completely different. That's totally true. It
		
00:50:14 --> 00:50:15
			was completely different.
		
00:50:15 --> 00:50:17
			As in, they they weren't concerned about any
		
00:50:17 --> 00:50:19
			of the other women that were concerned about.
		
00:50:19 --> 00:50:22
			It's nonsense. It's literally postmodern western
		
00:50:23 --> 00:50:24
			society where
		
00:50:25 --> 00:50:28
			just everyone thinks, yeah, it's just delusion.
		
00:50:28 --> 00:50:30
			As, you know, LTR says it's delusion. It's
		
00:50:30 --> 00:50:32
			just this idea that
		
00:50:33 --> 00:50:36
			I qualify for whatever I want, you know,
		
00:50:36 --> 00:50:37
			and what I want is what I should
		
00:50:37 --> 00:50:40
			have. And if if, you know and and
		
00:50:40 --> 00:50:42
			basically, if you can't bring what I want
		
00:50:42 --> 00:50:45
			to the table, then, you know, get lost.
		
00:50:45 --> 00:50:47
			But again, like, you know, like you said,
		
00:50:47 --> 00:50:48
			people thinking they have time
		
00:50:49 --> 00:50:50
			and that they have all the options.
		
00:50:51 --> 00:50:53
			Yep. Yep. But like I said, even even
		
00:50:53 --> 00:50:55
			when you mentioned you wonder, you said you're
		
00:50:55 --> 00:50:57
			you're educated and you've you've you've reached a
		
00:50:57 --> 00:50:59
			certain place in your life that you can't
		
00:50:59 --> 00:51:01
			imagine yourself respecting someone less than yourself.
		
00:51:02 --> 00:51:04
			That's what you think. I It's a story.
		
00:51:04 --> 00:51:06
			It's a story. Yeah. It's a story. Believe
		
00:51:07 --> 00:51:09
			that if you had a man whom you
		
00:51:09 --> 00:51:11
			love deeply, because he treats you well and
		
00:51:11 --> 00:51:14
			Yeah. All that other stuff, then his qualification
		
00:51:14 --> 00:51:16
			is overlook. Even how tall he is, you'd
		
00:51:16 --> 00:51:17
			overlook. Because
		
00:51:18 --> 00:51:20
			he took he you're able you basically, the
		
00:51:20 --> 00:51:21
			question is, are you able
		
00:51:22 --> 00:51:23
			to build this
		
00:51:23 --> 00:51:25
			structure with this person? That's what the question
		
00:51:25 --> 00:51:26
			is. Yeah.
		
00:51:27 --> 00:51:28
			And that's what I'm saying. I think that
		
00:51:29 --> 00:51:29
			that
		
00:51:30 --> 00:51:31
			Go on. From that?
		
00:51:31 --> 00:51:33
			No. No. I was just gonna say that
		
00:51:33 --> 00:51:33
			the
		
00:51:35 --> 00:51:36
			it's it's not
		
00:51:37 --> 00:51:38
			building
		
00:51:38 --> 00:51:39
			a lifestyle
		
00:51:43 --> 00:51:44
			and an individual
		
00:51:44 --> 00:51:47
			lifestyle with a man and kids attached. One
		
00:51:47 --> 00:51:48
			of my other guests mentioned that, which I
		
00:51:48 --> 00:51:51
			thought was so powerful. She said, look, you
		
00:51:51 --> 00:51:53
			either are going to choose yourself,
		
00:51:54 --> 00:51:56
			and you know, this vision that you have
		
00:51:56 --> 00:51:56
			for yourself.
		
00:51:57 --> 00:51:59
			I'm that kind of woman. I deserve that.
		
00:51:59 --> 00:52:01
			That's the life I want. That's the car
		
00:52:01 --> 00:52:02
			I wanna drive. That's the house I wanna
		
00:52:02 --> 00:52:04
			live in. That's the kind of man I
		
00:52:04 --> 00:52:07
			see myself with. This vision. Right? This fairy
		
00:52:07 --> 00:52:08
			tale that you've that you've got in your
		
00:52:08 --> 00:52:09
			head
		
00:52:09 --> 00:52:12
			and possibly with a man and kids attached
		
00:52:12 --> 00:52:15
			or you're going to join with another human
		
00:52:15 --> 00:52:17
			being and you're gonna build something worthwhile. And
		
00:52:17 --> 00:52:19
			you're going to put everything you have into
		
00:52:19 --> 00:52:21
			that and you're gonna sacrifice for it and
		
00:52:21 --> 00:52:23
			that's going to be part of your life's
		
00:52:23 --> 00:52:23
			purpose.
		
00:52:24 --> 00:52:25
			But the 2 of them are not the
		
00:52:25 --> 00:52:25
			same.
		
00:52:26 --> 00:52:27
			I mean, if you even if you look
		
00:52:27 --> 00:52:29
			even if you just scratch the surface on
		
00:52:29 --> 00:52:30
			on when people speak about what they want
		
00:52:30 --> 00:52:32
			for a marriage, I think you'd probably even
		
00:52:32 --> 00:52:33
			find that
		
00:52:34 --> 00:52:36
			kids aren't even in in the in the
		
00:52:36 --> 00:52:37
			top five things that they want for a
		
00:52:37 --> 00:52:39
			marriage. Oh, yeah. That's Where that where where
		
00:52:39 --> 00:52:41
			should be the top one. I mean, what
		
00:52:41 --> 00:52:42
			else are you coming together for other than
		
00:52:43 --> 00:52:45
			to have kids and raise another ummah? That
		
00:52:45 --> 00:52:48
			is the primary goal. Because people don't want
		
00:52:48 --> 00:52:49
			marriage. They want a relationship.
		
00:52:51 --> 00:52:52
			They want couple goals.
		
00:52:52 --> 00:52:54
			They want to have the the romance, the
		
00:52:54 --> 00:52:57
			halal romance, you know, the halal love story,
		
00:52:57 --> 00:53:00
			the the that the halal, Hollywood, blah blah.