Mohammed Hijab – Richard Dawkins Final Dash At Fame

Mohammed Hijab
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speaker discusses the negative comments made by a man named Richard Dawkins on Islam, stating that it is hostile towards women and towards men and animals. He also talks about the religious values of Islam and how it is not a monolithic approach. The speaker also mentions a debate offer and the need for a testicular fortitude in Norway.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:00 --> 00:00:02
			The prophet Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wasallam told us,
		
00:00:02 --> 00:00:05
			whoever builds a mosque for Allah, Allah will
		
00:00:05 --> 00:00:08
			build for him a similar house in Jannah.
		
00:00:09 --> 00:00:11
			And we know the great reward that will
		
00:00:11 --> 00:00:13
			not only be gained but rather
		
00:00:13 --> 00:00:15
			will fill your grave after your death.
		
00:00:16 --> 00:00:19
			Whenever someone prays there, whenever someone gives shahada
		
00:00:20 --> 00:00:23
			in the masjid, whenever someone learns something in
		
00:00:23 --> 00:00:23
			the masjid,
		
00:00:24 --> 00:00:24
			yes,
		
00:00:25 --> 00:00:27
			that will be something that you'll have on
		
00:00:27 --> 00:00:27
			your scale.
		
00:00:41 --> 00:00:42
			Retired zoologist,
		
00:00:42 --> 00:00:43
			Richard Dawkins,
		
00:00:44 --> 00:00:46
			has made an attempt to become relevant again
		
00:00:46 --> 00:00:49
			in the last moments of his life by
		
00:00:49 --> 00:00:51
			speaking about Islam. Let's take a look at
		
00:00:51 --> 00:00:52
			the video and come back and respond in
		
00:00:52 --> 00:00:54
			kind. The the way women retreat. I mean,
		
00:00:54 --> 00:00:56
			Christianity is not great about that.
		
00:00:57 --> 00:01:00
			It's had its problems with female vicars and
		
00:01:00 --> 00:01:01
			female bishops and things.
		
00:01:01 --> 00:01:04
			But there's an active hostility to women, which
		
00:01:04 --> 00:01:06
			is promoted, I think, by the holy books
		
00:01:06 --> 00:01:07
			of Islam.
		
00:01:08 --> 00:01:10
			I'm not talking about individual Muslims who, of
		
00:01:10 --> 00:01:10
			course,
		
00:01:11 --> 00:01:12
			are quite quite different.
		
00:01:12 --> 00:01:14
			But the but the doctrines of Islam, the
		
00:01:14 --> 00:01:16
			Hadith and the and the Quran,
		
00:01:16 --> 00:01:17
			fundamentally,
		
00:01:18 --> 00:01:20
			hostile to women, hostile to gays.
		
00:01:22 --> 00:01:22
			And,
		
00:01:23 --> 00:01:24
			I
		
00:01:25 --> 00:01:25
			find
		
00:01:26 --> 00:01:26
			that I
		
00:01:27 --> 00:01:30
			like to live in a culturally Christian country,
		
00:01:30 --> 00:01:31
			although I do not believe
		
00:01:32 --> 00:01:34
			a single word of the Christian faith.
		
00:01:35 --> 00:01:37
			Let's really assess what this man is saying
		
00:01:37 --> 00:01:41
			because he's made a few assertions, hasn't he?
		
00:01:41 --> 00:01:43
			And this is, typical of Richard Dawkins to
		
00:01:43 --> 00:01:45
			make assertions and not back them with evidence.
		
00:01:45 --> 00:01:47
			He mentioned the Quran. He mentioned the sunnah.
		
00:01:47 --> 00:01:48
			He mentioned the hadith.
		
00:01:49 --> 00:01:49
			However,
		
00:01:50 --> 00:01:52
			he didn't actually provide any evidence of what
		
00:01:52 --> 00:01:54
			he is saying. Now, we all know Islam
		
00:01:54 --> 00:01:56
			has a diametrically
		
00:01:56 --> 00:01:57
			opposed in many ways
		
00:01:58 --> 00:02:01
			view on say homosexuality or the morality thereof
		
00:02:02 --> 00:02:03
			than let's say liberal,
		
00:02:04 --> 00:02:06
			societies and so on. That's something which is
		
00:02:06 --> 00:02:08
			taken for granted. We all know that. We
		
00:02:08 --> 00:02:10
			also know that there is some level of,
		
00:02:11 --> 00:02:13
			if you like, a managerial hierarchy in the
		
00:02:13 --> 00:02:14
			family setting and otherwise
		
00:02:15 --> 00:02:17
			between men and women in Islam. But to
		
00:02:17 --> 00:02:20
			go further than this and to say that
		
00:02:20 --> 00:02:24
			Islam is hostile towards women, hostile towards gays,
		
00:02:24 --> 00:02:26
			and then to compare it with Christianity.
		
00:02:27 --> 00:02:29
			Well, actually, the same kind
		
00:02:29 --> 00:02:32
			of criticism from a liberal paradigm can be
		
00:02:32 --> 00:02:33
			made about Christianity
		
00:02:33 --> 00:02:35
			in its literal and orthodox
		
00:02:36 --> 00:02:38
			formats both Catholicism and Protestantism
		
00:02:38 --> 00:02:40
			and Judaism. In fact,
		
00:02:40 --> 00:02:42
			regarding the two very issues that he mentioned
		
00:02:42 --> 00:02:44
			from a liberal and feminist paradigm. So one
		
00:02:44 --> 00:02:47
			could say that on a liberal atheist
		
00:02:47 --> 00:02:48
			secular analysis,
		
00:02:49 --> 00:02:51
			for example, the verse in Timothy which talks
		
00:02:51 --> 00:02:53
			about the man being the head of the
		
00:02:53 --> 00:02:54
			household
		
00:02:55 --> 00:02:57
			or that man shall not lie with other
		
00:02:57 --> 00:03:00
			man and the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah.
		
00:03:01 --> 00:03:02
			Those are things that you'll find in the
		
00:03:02 --> 00:03:03
			bible. So
		
00:03:03 --> 00:03:06
			to compare Islam and Christianity and then to
		
00:03:06 --> 00:03:09
			use those liberal talking points as they are.
		
00:03:09 --> 00:03:11
			Liberal talking points with a small l
		
00:03:12 --> 00:03:13
			against them
		
00:03:13 --> 00:03:15
			is actually a weak argument to say the
		
00:03:15 --> 00:03:19
			least. And Richard Dawkins is a coward because
		
00:03:19 --> 00:03:21
			he has not been able to argue his
		
00:03:21 --> 00:03:23
			position as a zoologist because that's what he
		
00:03:23 --> 00:03:25
			is. I mean, why is a zoologist talking
		
00:03:25 --> 00:03:27
			about religion anyway? Why is he talking about
		
00:03:27 --> 00:03:30
			theology? Why is he talking about philosophy? Why
		
00:03:30 --> 00:03:31
			is he talking about all those things in
		
00:03:31 --> 00:03:33
			the first place? But let's say he does
		
00:03:33 --> 00:03:36
			wanna engage in those discussions. Instead of being
		
00:03:36 --> 00:03:37
			brave and gallant
		
00:03:38 --> 00:03:38
			and having
		
00:03:39 --> 00:03:40
			the intellectual
		
00:03:40 --> 00:03:43
			courage of standing forth in front of someone
		
00:03:43 --> 00:03:46
			who could oppose his views and challenge them,
		
00:03:46 --> 00:03:48
			He just makes a few sneaky remarks
		
00:03:48 --> 00:03:50
			on the radio.
		
00:03:50 --> 00:03:52
			Well, as I say, we'll see what happens
		
00:03:52 --> 00:03:55
			when you die because that moment is coming
		
00:03:55 --> 00:03:57
			soon. We could all die soon. I could
		
00:03:57 --> 00:03:59
			die, you could die but you're more likely
		
00:03:59 --> 00:04:01
			to die much quicker than I because of
		
00:04:01 --> 00:04:03
			your age and so you should be thinking
		
00:04:03 --> 00:04:06
			about really what's gonna happen after your death.
		
00:04:06 --> 00:04:08
			But one thing I will say is this,
		
00:04:08 --> 00:04:10
			in one of your books, The Blind Watchmaker,
		
00:04:10 --> 00:04:11
			Richard,
		
00:04:12 --> 00:04:14
			you mentioned that that there is no such
		
00:04:14 --> 00:04:15
			thing as morality. There is no such thing
		
00:04:15 --> 00:04:17
			as good or evil.
		
00:04:17 --> 00:04:18
			There is only
		
00:04:19 --> 00:04:20
			pitless indifference.
		
00:04:20 --> 00:04:23
			So really and truly, if you read the
		
00:04:23 --> 00:04:25
			God Delusion which is your seminal work, which
		
00:04:25 --> 00:04:28
			is interesting because why is a zoologist writing
		
00:04:28 --> 00:04:30
			a seminal work on issues nothing to do
		
00:04:30 --> 00:04:33
			with zoology or science? And when you spoke
		
00:04:33 --> 00:04:35
			to Dennis Noble, who is seen as one
		
00:04:35 --> 00:04:36
			of the esteemed
		
00:04:38 --> 00:04:40
			esteemed biologists in the United Kingdom, in fact,
		
00:04:40 --> 00:04:41
			in the world.
		
00:04:42 --> 00:04:42
			And he rubbished
		
00:04:43 --> 00:04:46
			your ideas and criticized you and put you
		
00:04:46 --> 00:04:46
			in your spot
		
00:04:47 --> 00:04:49
			and humiliated you intellectually
		
00:04:49 --> 00:04:51
			and he in fact is the one who
		
00:04:51 --> 00:04:54
			invented this labelled science journalist vis a vis
		
00:04:54 --> 00:04:55
			you and your efforts,
		
00:04:56 --> 00:04:56
			you really couldn't
		
00:04:57 --> 00:04:59
			withstand that kind of criticism. But if you
		
00:04:59 --> 00:05:01
			read your book, The God Delusion, most of
		
00:05:01 --> 00:05:02
			it is actually attacks
		
00:05:03 --> 00:05:06
			based on morality. But if you do not
		
00:05:06 --> 00:05:08
			believe in an objective morality and that everything
		
00:05:08 --> 00:05:10
			is pitless and different. So whether
		
00:05:11 --> 00:05:13
			one is hostile to gays, one is hostile
		
00:05:13 --> 00:05:15
			to women, one is hostile to men or
		
00:05:15 --> 00:05:16
			children or animals or anyone else.
		
00:05:17 --> 00:05:20
			That is according to pitless indifference. It doesn't
		
00:05:20 --> 00:05:22
			matter if they are,
		
00:05:22 --> 00:05:25
			you know, hostile or not hostile. Peaceful or
		
00:05:25 --> 00:05:26
			hostile. It doesn't matter.
		
00:05:27 --> 00:05:29
			Finally, I will say this. The entitlement in
		
00:05:29 --> 00:05:31
			your speech is quite clear.
		
00:05:32 --> 00:05:33
			For you to speak in this way and
		
00:05:33 --> 00:05:35
			just think of the United Kingdom as kind
		
00:05:35 --> 00:05:37
			of like your garden or your backyard.
		
00:05:38 --> 00:05:39
			I wouldn't wanna see this there and I
		
00:05:39 --> 00:05:41
			wouldn't see that there. It shows you that
		
00:05:41 --> 00:05:43
			you don't actually have respect for the democratic
		
00:05:43 --> 00:05:46
			process. She kept asking you what if, you
		
00:05:46 --> 00:05:48
			know, Britain became a Muslim majority country, so
		
00:05:48 --> 00:05:50
			on and so forth. I mean, if you
		
00:05:50 --> 00:05:53
			cared about the principles of democracy
		
00:05:53 --> 00:05:55
			and so on and so forth, then you
		
00:05:55 --> 00:05:57
			would you would actually answer in a in
		
00:05:57 --> 00:05:58
			a way which would be commensurate
		
00:05:58 --> 00:06:00
			with that. You'd say, well, if that's the
		
00:06:00 --> 00:06:02
			will of the majority of this or that,
		
00:06:02 --> 00:06:05
			which shows you that you cannot avoid the
		
00:06:05 --> 00:06:06
			in group out group tribal
		
00:06:07 --> 00:06:09
			dynamics. In your last
		
00:06:10 --> 00:06:12
			days on this planet
		
00:06:12 --> 00:06:13
			probably
		
00:06:13 --> 00:06:14
			or weeks
		
00:06:14 --> 00:06:16
			if you're lucky months
		
00:06:17 --> 00:06:17
			you know, maybe.
		
00:06:18 --> 00:06:20
			In those last moments of your
		
00:06:21 --> 00:06:22
			withering life,
		
00:06:22 --> 00:06:23
			you've decided
		
00:06:24 --> 00:06:26
			to attach yourself culturally
		
00:06:27 --> 00:06:29
			with the religion that you've spent a long
		
00:06:29 --> 00:06:31
			time trying to oppose which is Christianity.
		
00:06:31 --> 00:06:33
			Which shows a lot about
		
00:06:34 --> 00:06:37
			you. Finally, I will say the debate offer
		
00:06:37 --> 00:06:38
			has always been put on the table to
		
00:06:38 --> 00:06:39
			you, Richard.
		
00:06:40 --> 00:06:42
			We've always said if you really wanna speak
		
00:06:42 --> 00:06:44
			about Islam, the Muslim community is willing to
		
00:06:44 --> 00:06:45
			have that conversation.
		
00:06:46 --> 00:06:47
			And before you die,
		
00:06:48 --> 00:06:49
			maybe you'd want to summon
		
00:06:50 --> 00:06:51
			the testicular fortitude
		
00:06:52 --> 00:06:55
			although maybe that has withered her as well
		
00:06:55 --> 00:06:56
			to do so.
		
00:06:58 --> 00:07:00
			Hey you, are you wasting your time on
		
00:07:00 --> 00:07:03
			social media again? Your brothers and sisters in
		
00:07:04 --> 00:07:07
			Islam Net from Norway are establishing a Masjid,
		
00:07:07 --> 00:07:10
			a dawah center. Establishing a Masjid to convey
		
00:07:10 --> 00:07:12
			the message of Islam is one of the
		
00:07:12 --> 00:07:15
			best deeds a Muslim can do. There's a
		
00:07:15 --> 00:07:17
			huge need for it in Norway. You know
		
00:07:17 --> 00:07:19
			this and I know this. So that makes
		
00:07:19 --> 00:07:19
			the reward
		
00:07:20 --> 00:07:21
			even greater.
		
00:07:21 --> 00:07:23
			So give generously and Allah
		
00:07:24 --> 00:07:25
			give you even more.