Mohammed Hijab – Patrick Bet David Attacks

Mohammed Hijab
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The conversation covers the age of consent and the weight of sex in relation to the age of consent. There are discussions of comments and claims on Islam, examples of comments and claims on older topics, and the use of "medic shake" in religious reasons for religious reasons. The speakers emphasize the importance of proving door-time records and testimony from groomers, the use of pumpkin sales and grooming in the UK, the use of alcohol and drugs in the UK, and the use of Elon Musk as aceive of men and women. They express concern about the use of alcohol and drugs in the UK and the use of Elon Musk as aceive of men and women.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:00 --> 00:00:02
			This is Mohamed Hajib, I believe he...
		
00:00:02 --> 00:00:03
			This is him.
		
00:00:03 --> 00:00:03
			What's he saying?
		
00:00:04 --> 00:00:04
			They're defending...
		
00:00:04 --> 00:00:07
			He's defending Mohamed is * with children and
		
00:00:07 --> 00:00:09
			calls * relative.
		
00:00:09 --> 00:00:09
			At all.
		
00:00:10 --> 00:00:11
			We think that it's just because we have
		
00:00:11 --> 00:00:13
			a different idea of what it means to
		
00:00:13 --> 00:00:15
			be a child, which can be tracked historically.
		
00:00:15 --> 00:00:17
			In these countries where we live in now,
		
00:00:18 --> 00:00:19
			one is legal and one is...
		
00:00:19 --> 00:00:20
			Both are...
		
00:00:20 --> 00:00:20
			One is illegal.
		
00:00:21 --> 00:00:23
			Is this guy trying to justify having *
		
00:00:23 --> 00:00:24
			with a 17-year-old girl?
		
00:00:25 --> 00:00:26
			Is this what he's trying to do right
		
00:00:26 --> 00:00:26
			now?
		
00:00:26 --> 00:00:27
			You have to listen to the end.
		
00:00:27 --> 00:00:28
			He's not finished.
		
00:00:28 --> 00:00:30
			Once again, * is very relative.
		
00:00:30 --> 00:00:31
			Very relative.
		
00:00:31 --> 00:00:32
			So what are you trying to do, Mohamed?
		
00:00:32 --> 00:00:33
			Are you trying to change the age of
		
00:00:33 --> 00:00:34
			consent?
		
00:00:34 --> 00:00:35
			So, is it not?
		
00:00:35 --> 00:00:39
			Is * is legally relative as a matter
		
00:00:39 --> 00:00:39
			of fact.
		
00:00:40 --> 00:00:40
			That's not my opinion.
		
00:00:41 --> 00:00:42
			That is a matter of fact.
		
00:00:42 --> 00:00:43
			As I mentioned, if you go to Germany,
		
00:00:44 --> 00:00:45
			the age of consent is 14 years old.
		
00:00:46 --> 00:00:47
			If you go to the United Kingdom, the
		
00:00:47 --> 00:00:49
			age of consent is 16 years old.
		
00:00:49 --> 00:00:51
			If you go to the United States, in
		
00:00:51 --> 00:00:53
			some places, the age of consent is 18
		
00:00:53 --> 00:00:54
			years old.
		
00:00:54 --> 00:00:56
			In some other places in the EU, it's
		
00:00:56 --> 00:00:57
			go back to 14.
		
00:00:57 --> 00:00:59
			In Italy, in Spain, etc.
		
00:00:59 --> 00:01:02
			The seven European countries, EU countries, which the
		
00:01:02 --> 00:01:03
			age of consent is 14.
		
00:01:03 --> 00:01:05
			I actually mentioned the age 14.
		
00:01:05 --> 00:01:06
			If they had a real problem with it,
		
00:01:06 --> 00:01:08
			I don't see them protesting against the German
		
00:01:08 --> 00:01:08
			laws.
		
00:01:09 --> 00:01:11
			I don't see them protesting against the Spanish
		
00:01:11 --> 00:01:11
			laws.
		
00:01:11 --> 00:01:13
			I don't see them protesting against Italian laws.
		
00:01:13 --> 00:01:15
			The point I'm saying is this, is that
		
00:01:15 --> 00:01:19
			it's relative by virtue of fact.
		
00:01:19 --> 00:01:20
			And it's not my opinion.
		
00:01:20 --> 00:01:21
			That is a fact.
		
00:01:21 --> 00:01:24
			If you're in England and you have *
		
00:01:24 --> 00:01:26
			with a 13-year-old European or 14
		
00:01:26 --> 00:01:28
			-year-old European *, and if you go
		
00:01:28 --> 00:01:32
			to America and you have * with the
		
00:01:32 --> 00:01:33
			same age, then you're not a *.
		
00:01:34 --> 00:01:37
			So it's relative based on the arbitrary measures
		
00:01:37 --> 00:01:40
			of policymakers in different parts of the world.
		
00:01:41 --> 00:01:42
			That is a matter of fact.
		
00:01:42 --> 00:01:44
			If they want to reprimand, they have to
		
00:01:44 --> 00:01:46
			now come with an argument against.
		
00:01:46 --> 00:01:48
			So is he trying to justify * with
		
00:01:48 --> 00:01:48
			children?
		
00:01:49 --> 00:01:50
			Children, that's the whole question.
		
00:01:50 --> 00:01:51
			That's the inquiry.
		
00:01:51 --> 00:01:52
			What is a child?
		
00:01:52 --> 00:01:53
			That is the question.
		
00:01:53 --> 00:01:54
			He's poisoning the well.
		
00:01:54 --> 00:01:56
			He is begging the question, which is a
		
00:01:56 --> 00:01:56
			fallacy.
		
00:01:57 --> 00:01:58
			It's called begging the question fallacy.
		
00:01:59 --> 00:02:00
			I'm not saying that they're children.
		
00:02:00 --> 00:02:01
			I don't believe in having * with children.
		
00:02:02 --> 00:02:02
			No, I don't believe in that.
		
00:02:03 --> 00:02:04
			I've never said that once in my entire
		
00:02:04 --> 00:02:05
			life.
		
00:02:05 --> 00:02:06
			You never said that once.
		
00:02:06 --> 00:02:07
			Let's make that clear.
		
00:02:07 --> 00:02:08
			Of course, I've never said that once.
		
00:02:08 --> 00:02:12
			And I think the low IQ, hot noodle
		
00:02:12 --> 00:02:15
			eating, you know, weirdo that was sitting there,
		
00:02:16 --> 00:02:18
			that maybe he was, sorry to say, watching
		
00:02:18 --> 00:02:21
			something, maybe that he shouldn't have been watching
		
00:02:21 --> 00:02:24
			before, you know, eating his pot noodles, eating
		
00:02:24 --> 00:02:26
			his crispy cream, watching what he shouldn't have
		
00:02:26 --> 00:02:30
			been watching in his mother's cellar, had the
		
00:02:30 --> 00:02:33
			audacity to speak in that manner and try
		
00:02:33 --> 00:02:36
			and inquire in that way without humbling himself
		
00:02:36 --> 00:02:39
			and asking questions and being a real man,
		
00:02:39 --> 00:02:40
			which he cannot be.
		
00:02:40 --> 00:02:41
			And he is not.
		
00:02:42 --> 00:02:42
			Yeah.
		
00:02:42 --> 00:02:44
			And the other ones, they're sitting like sitting
		
00:02:44 --> 00:02:45
			ducks, low IQ.
		
00:02:45 --> 00:02:48
			They don't realize that actually there was nothing
		
00:02:48 --> 00:02:50
			in the speech of this man that suggested
		
00:02:50 --> 00:02:51
			what this man is suggesting I'm saying.
		
00:02:52 --> 00:02:53
			If he was in the United Kingdom, I
		
00:02:53 --> 00:02:55
			would sue him for defamation of character.
		
00:02:56 --> 00:02:57
			Now, the reason why I'm not doing that,
		
00:02:57 --> 00:03:00
			because in the United States, it's much more
		
00:03:00 --> 00:03:00
			difficult to do that.
		
00:03:01 --> 00:03:02
			And it's much more costly.
		
00:03:02 --> 00:03:04
			And he's not that significant.
		
00:03:04 --> 00:03:07
			Anyway, this individual who looked like he was
		
00:03:07 --> 00:03:10
			a shoe shiner for Patrick Davis, maybe he
		
00:03:10 --> 00:03:13
			was shining some shoes and stuff like that
		
00:03:13 --> 00:03:14
			and cleaning in the toilets.
		
00:03:14 --> 00:03:15
			And then they said, just come in for
		
00:03:15 --> 00:03:15
			a second.
		
00:03:15 --> 00:03:17
			We've run out of guests today.
		
00:03:17 --> 00:03:19
			Come just say, just sit here and just
		
00:03:19 --> 00:03:21
			fiddle with the computer, make yourself useful and
		
00:03:21 --> 00:03:23
			give us some coffees and teas as well
		
00:03:23 --> 00:03:24
			and some Krispy Kremes and you know how
		
00:03:24 --> 00:03:25
			to make the pot noodles.
		
00:03:25 --> 00:03:26
			Might as well make that one as well.
		
00:03:27 --> 00:03:30
			So this guy who is a nobody, who's
		
00:03:30 --> 00:03:34
			trying to challenge me and Pat Davis, we
		
00:03:34 --> 00:03:36
			spoke to Pat Davis, me and you, and
		
00:03:36 --> 00:03:38
			we spoke, you know, we had a good
		
00:03:38 --> 00:03:40
			conversation, never disrespected the man myself.
		
00:03:40 --> 00:03:43
			I've only held him to account in the
		
00:03:43 --> 00:03:46
			proper and meaningful way where he has, you
		
00:03:46 --> 00:03:50
			know, across the boundaries, should have had the
		
00:03:50 --> 00:03:55
			integrity, the intellectual integrity to stop this chump
		
00:03:55 --> 00:03:57
			from saying the stuff that he was saying.
		
00:03:57 --> 00:03:58
			But he didn't have that.
		
00:03:58 --> 00:04:00
			And we don't expect that from them.
		
00:04:02 --> 00:04:04
			Let's go on to a couple more clips.
		
00:04:04 --> 00:04:06
			Let's go to the next one.
		
00:04:06 --> 00:04:08
			Hey guys, and let's just go back because
		
00:04:08 --> 00:04:09
			Jesus Christ, you know what I'm saying?
		
00:04:09 --> 00:04:12
			We're Christians and you have to say what
		
00:04:12 --> 00:04:12
			it is.
		
00:04:12 --> 00:04:15
			Jesus Christ spread love, spread peace, spread all
		
00:04:15 --> 00:04:16
			that type of stuff.
		
00:04:17 --> 00:04:18
			Was he a virgin, Tom?
		
00:04:18 --> 00:04:19
			Jesus Christ?
		
00:04:19 --> 00:04:19
			Yes.
		
00:04:20 --> 00:04:20
			Okay.
		
00:04:20 --> 00:04:21
			He's treated women great.
		
00:04:21 --> 00:04:23
			If we're going to go according to many
		
00:04:23 --> 00:04:27
			Islamic historical sources, including the Hadith collections of
		
00:04:27 --> 00:04:30
			the Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim, the
		
00:04:30 --> 00:04:33
			prophet Muhammad was betrothed to Asia when she
		
00:04:33 --> 00:04:35
			was six years old and the marriage was
		
00:04:35 --> 00:04:37
			consummated when she was nine years old.
		
00:04:37 --> 00:04:38
			I'm just throwing out facts.
		
00:04:39 --> 00:04:40
			This guy's name is Muhammad.
		
00:04:40 --> 00:04:42
			That's what he's basically preaching is that this
		
00:04:42 --> 00:04:44
			is that type of mindset.
		
00:04:44 --> 00:04:46
			I mean, we've read this and we've seen
		
00:04:46 --> 00:04:47
			this, right?
		
00:04:47 --> 00:04:47
			All right.
		
00:04:47 --> 00:04:48
			He brought up Jesus.
		
00:04:48 --> 00:04:50
			He started off with Jesus.
		
00:04:51 --> 00:04:52
			We have a lot to say here.
		
00:04:53 --> 00:04:55
			The first thing I will say is that
		
00:04:55 --> 00:04:57
			they believe that Jesus is the author of
		
00:04:57 --> 00:04:59
			the Old Testament because he's part of the
		
00:04:59 --> 00:04:59
			Trinity.
		
00:04:59 --> 00:05:01
			Because don't forget, they believe that the Father,
		
00:05:01 --> 00:05:03
			the Son, the Holy Spirit are one God
		
00:05:03 --> 00:05:05
			and therefore would follow that he's the author
		
00:05:05 --> 00:05:06
			of the Old Testament.
		
00:05:06 --> 00:05:08
			And it would also follow, therefore, that when
		
00:05:08 --> 00:05:13
			Jesus, part of the Trinity mentioned, the person
		
00:05:13 --> 00:05:15
			of the Trinity mentioned in Numbers chapter 31,
		
00:05:15 --> 00:05:18
			18, that take the young ones for yourself
		
00:05:18 --> 00:05:23
			and almost all rabbinic commentators said that young
		
00:05:23 --> 00:05:25
			ones means prepubescence actually.
		
00:05:25 --> 00:05:27
			There is no such equivalent verse in the
		
00:05:27 --> 00:05:28
			Quran.
		
00:05:28 --> 00:05:30
			There's no such equivalent hadith in the prophet's
		
00:05:30 --> 00:05:30
			sayings.
		
00:05:31 --> 00:05:33
			There is nothing in Islam that says you
		
00:05:33 --> 00:05:35
			can take the young ones, the prepubescence for
		
00:05:35 --> 00:05:36
			yourself.
		
00:05:36 --> 00:05:40
			So according to them, Jesus Christ, okay, he
		
00:05:40 --> 00:05:45
			ordered people to essentially, and some commentaries actually
		
00:05:45 --> 00:05:49
			say, them sexually assault them without their will.
		
00:05:49 --> 00:05:50
			So sorry to say.
		
00:05:50 --> 00:05:52
			So if you're saying you could 1000%
		
00:05:52 --> 00:05:55
			disagree with it, then can you please come
		
00:05:55 --> 00:05:57
			online and tell us that you 1000%
		
00:05:57 --> 00:06:00
			disagree with the Bible and 1000% disagree
		
00:06:00 --> 00:06:03
			with Jesus Christ and 1000% disagree with
		
00:06:03 --> 00:06:08
			Numbers chapter 31 verse 18 and 1000%
		
00:06:08 --> 00:06:10
			disagree with the injunctions given therein?
		
00:06:11 --> 00:06:15
			I can 1000% guarantee that this chump
		
00:06:15 --> 00:06:19
			will not do that because he does not
		
00:06:19 --> 00:06:24
			have the intellectual prowess or the integrity.
		
00:06:24 --> 00:06:26
			He's not integrous enough to be able to
		
00:06:26 --> 00:06:28
			face his own contradictions.
		
00:06:28 --> 00:06:31
			And in fact, his argument has collapsed under
		
00:06:31 --> 00:06:35
			the weight of the internal contradictions therein.
		
00:06:35 --> 00:06:37
			So I would say to you that the
		
00:06:37 --> 00:06:39
			first thing, if you wanted to mention Jesus
		
00:06:39 --> 00:06:41
			is to mention what I've just mentioned.
		
00:06:41 --> 00:06:44
			And especially this verse of Numbers chapter 31,
		
00:06:44 --> 00:06:47
			18, you can look, go and look into
		
00:06:47 --> 00:06:51
			there is a website called Sephardim.com which
		
00:06:51 --> 00:06:54
			shows you all of the commentaries of the
		
00:06:54 --> 00:06:58
			Old Testament, especially the rabbinic commentaries using the
		
00:06:58 --> 00:07:02
			Hebrew language a full time about this, the
		
00:07:02 --> 00:07:06
			Talmudic commentaries, the Babylonian Talmud, the Palestinian Talmud
		
00:07:06 --> 00:07:07
			about this particular verse.
		
00:07:07 --> 00:07:09
			And it's pretty clear.
		
00:07:09 --> 00:07:11
			And even some translations into English talk about
		
00:07:11 --> 00:07:12
			young girls.
		
00:07:12 --> 00:07:13
			It's pretty clear.
		
00:07:13 --> 00:07:15
			If you look at the sources, this is
		
00:07:15 --> 00:07:18
			talking about the prepubescent ones.
		
00:07:18 --> 00:07:21
			So the right wing people and this man
		
00:07:21 --> 00:07:23
			and other people that want to accuse the
		
00:07:23 --> 00:07:25
			prophet Muhammad of such and such and this
		
00:07:25 --> 00:07:27
			and that, you have to first deal with
		
00:07:27 --> 00:07:31
			this inquiry before you start speaking about Islam.
		
00:07:32 --> 00:07:35
			And then now we've already addressed this, but
		
00:07:35 --> 00:07:36
			then I'll address it again.
		
00:07:36 --> 00:07:39
			He started mentioning about Aisha, you know, at
		
00:07:39 --> 00:07:41
			the age of nine, et cetera, et cetera.
		
00:07:41 --> 00:07:43
			And the response to this is as follows.
		
00:07:43 --> 00:07:46
			As we both mentioned, and quite rightly so,
		
00:07:46 --> 00:07:48
			me and you and the rest of the
		
00:07:48 --> 00:07:51
			Muslim people and the majority of the populations,
		
00:07:51 --> 00:07:54
			especially in the West, do not condone or
		
00:07:54 --> 00:07:56
			are asking for a change in the age
		
00:07:56 --> 00:07:58
			of consent, whether in the UK, in the
		
00:07:58 --> 00:08:01
			US, in the EU, or even in the
		
00:08:01 --> 00:08:01
			Muslim countries.
		
00:08:01 --> 00:08:03
			We have no such desire.
		
00:08:04 --> 00:08:07
			There's not been one protest movement, one lobby
		
00:08:07 --> 00:08:07
			group.
		
00:08:08 --> 00:08:09
			By the way, there was, I'm not sure
		
00:08:09 --> 00:08:10
			if you know this, in the UK, there
		
00:08:10 --> 00:08:14
			was in fact an organization called PIE, which
		
00:08:14 --> 00:08:16
			is linked to the Labour Party, which is
		
00:08:16 --> 00:08:18
			the party that is in charge now of
		
00:08:18 --> 00:08:19
			government.
		
00:08:19 --> 00:08:23
			That was officially politically lobbying for the reduction
		
00:08:23 --> 00:08:24
			of the age of consent.
		
00:08:25 --> 00:08:25
			Yeah.
		
00:08:25 --> 00:08:28
			So the only people that actually have that
		
00:08:28 --> 00:08:30
			history are the very people that are in
		
00:08:30 --> 00:08:32
			power in these countries.
		
00:08:32 --> 00:08:35
			We don't have such a wish or desire
		
00:08:35 --> 00:08:36
			to change the age of consent.
		
00:08:37 --> 00:08:40
			Having said that, when we make the apologia,
		
00:08:40 --> 00:08:45
			for example, for the argument, the polemical argument,
		
00:08:46 --> 00:08:47
			that's what we're doing.
		
00:08:47 --> 00:08:49
			We're making a historical argument for the age
		
00:08:49 --> 00:08:50
			of Aisha at nine years old.
		
00:08:51 --> 00:08:53
			And by the way, if we really wanted
		
00:08:53 --> 00:08:56
			to say this, we could, that someone could
		
00:08:56 --> 00:08:58
			say, is it possible, the question is, to
		
00:08:58 --> 00:09:00
			be a Muslim and believe in the revisionist
		
00:09:00 --> 00:09:01
			account of her being 18, for example?
		
00:09:01 --> 00:09:02
			It's possible.
		
00:09:02 --> 00:09:03
			It's not an article of faith.
		
00:09:03 --> 00:09:06
			There is no Takfir or excommunication issue therein.
		
00:09:06 --> 00:09:08
			Is believing that Aisha being the age of
		
00:09:08 --> 00:09:10
			nine years old an article of Islamic faith?
		
00:09:11 --> 00:09:12
			Is it one of the five pillars of
		
00:09:12 --> 00:09:13
			Iman or one of the five pillars of
		
00:09:13 --> 00:09:13
			Islam?
		
00:09:14 --> 00:09:14
			No, it's not.
		
00:09:14 --> 00:09:16
			So someone can conceivably be a Muslim and
		
00:09:16 --> 00:09:17
			not even believe in that anyway.
		
00:09:17 --> 00:09:19
			But putting that to the side, I will
		
00:09:19 --> 00:09:20
			say this.
		
00:09:21 --> 00:09:23
			I do believe in the historical account of
		
00:09:23 --> 00:09:24
			nine years old, and I personally believe it
		
00:09:24 --> 00:09:27
			goes back to social and societal norms.
		
00:09:27 --> 00:09:29
			I personally believe it's to do with how
		
00:09:29 --> 00:09:33
			people define adulthood at that time, comparative to
		
00:09:33 --> 00:09:35
			how we in most of the world define
		
00:09:35 --> 00:09:37
			it in our time due to society.
		
00:09:38 --> 00:09:39
			And someone will say, and this is the
		
00:09:39 --> 00:09:41
			counter argument, well, didn't you say that your
		
00:09:41 --> 00:09:44
			prophet was a prophet for all humankind?
		
00:09:44 --> 00:09:46
			So how come he's doing this and you're
		
00:09:46 --> 00:09:47
			saying we shouldn't do it?
		
00:09:47 --> 00:09:49
			The answer is the same prophet that told
		
00:09:49 --> 00:09:52
			us this also told us that society changes.
		
00:09:52 --> 00:09:54
			And he told us all of the rules.
		
00:09:54 --> 00:09:55
			He told us all of the rules of
		
00:09:55 --> 00:09:57
			how to deal with this changing society.
		
00:09:57 --> 00:10:00
			For example, the principle of harm, the principle
		
00:10:00 --> 00:10:01
			of necessity in Islam.
		
00:10:03 --> 00:10:05
			These are all hadiths of the prophet that
		
00:10:05 --> 00:10:07
			you cannot harm or reciprocate harm.
		
00:10:07 --> 00:10:11
			And I would posture and wager that what
		
00:10:11 --> 00:10:13
			you do with a 13 or 14 or
		
00:10:13 --> 00:10:16
			12, whatever it is, year old, a thousand
		
00:10:16 --> 00:10:18
			years ago, where they had a completely different
		
00:10:18 --> 00:10:20
			upbringing and a completely different social structure is
		
00:10:20 --> 00:10:22
			completely different to what you do with them
		
00:10:22 --> 00:10:25
			here, where they are mollycoddled and got sent
		
00:10:25 --> 00:10:25
			to school every day.
		
00:10:25 --> 00:10:28
			And they have a completely different lived experience.
		
00:10:28 --> 00:10:33
			And therefore, I would say, yes, *, it
		
00:10:33 --> 00:10:36
			is relative to one's definition of adulthood by
		
00:10:36 --> 00:10:40
			historical fact, by current legalistic reality.
		
00:10:41 --> 00:10:43
			And therefore, you don't have a right, I
		
00:10:43 --> 00:10:46
			would say, to accuse our prophet Muhammad of
		
00:10:46 --> 00:10:51
			such a heinous crime without taking into account
		
00:10:51 --> 00:10:55
			those relativistic differences and cultural difference, sociological
		
00:10:55 --> 00:10:56
			differences.
		
00:10:56 --> 00:10:57
			That's how I would say.
		
00:10:58 --> 00:11:00
			You mentioned Jesus, peace be upon him, who
		
00:11:00 --> 00:11:01
			we love and revere as one of the
		
00:11:01 --> 00:11:04
			mightiest messengers sent for his people at his
		
00:11:04 --> 00:11:05
			time.
		
00:11:05 --> 00:11:07
			And now if you make that argument that
		
00:11:07 --> 00:11:11
			now, because he started off as he's love,
		
00:11:11 --> 00:11:11
			he's peace.
		
00:11:12 --> 00:11:13
			And so if he's one in three in
		
00:11:13 --> 00:11:14
			a trinity, he's God.
		
00:11:15 --> 00:11:17
			So he's giving these orders, which you quoted
		
00:11:17 --> 00:11:19
			numbers, you know, take the little ones for
		
00:11:19 --> 00:11:19
			yourselves.
		
00:11:20 --> 00:11:20
			Exactly.
		
00:11:20 --> 00:11:22
			Wouldn't he also be the one that dictated
		
00:11:22 --> 00:11:25
			that Mary, that she be 12 when she
		
00:11:25 --> 00:11:27
			gave birth to Jesus?
		
00:11:27 --> 00:11:28
			Yes, exactly.
		
00:11:28 --> 00:11:30
			And there are many, many reports that indicate
		
00:11:30 --> 00:11:31
			that age.
		
00:11:31 --> 00:11:33
			And just as there are many, many reports
		
00:11:33 --> 00:11:36
			that indicate that Rebecca was three years old.
		
00:11:36 --> 00:11:38
			And you'll find that all over the Jewish
		
00:11:38 --> 00:11:38
			sources.
		
00:11:39 --> 00:11:40
			But these are things that they'll just hand
		
00:11:40 --> 00:11:41
			wave off.
		
00:11:41 --> 00:11:42
			They don't care about any of that stuff.
		
00:11:43 --> 00:11:45
			Because remember, now Christianity has become a thing
		
00:11:45 --> 00:11:47
			which you can just pick and choose from.
		
00:11:47 --> 00:11:49
			So people metaphorize that which they don't want.
		
00:11:49 --> 00:11:51
			All those genocides that I mentioned in the
		
00:11:51 --> 00:11:52
			Old Testament, all those things they don't like,
		
00:11:52 --> 00:11:53
			they just metaphorize it.
		
00:11:54 --> 00:11:56
			They just, all those scientific inaccuracies that bogus
		
00:11:56 --> 00:11:58
			claims of the creation of the universe, seven
		
00:11:58 --> 00:12:00
			day resting, anything they don't like, they'll just
		
00:12:00 --> 00:12:02
			metaphorize it as a metaphor.
		
00:12:02 --> 00:12:05
			And so for them, the situation, they'll just
		
00:12:05 --> 00:12:06
			hand wave off.
		
00:12:06 --> 00:12:08
			But one thing that this guy said, which
		
00:12:08 --> 00:12:11
			I think is also worthy of mentioning, is
		
00:12:11 --> 00:12:14
			that he connected this hadith of the Prophet
		
00:12:14 --> 00:12:16
			Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam with the behavior of
		
00:12:16 --> 00:12:18
			the groomers in the UK.
		
00:12:18 --> 00:12:22
			Now, in sociology, okay, you need to be
		
00:12:22 --> 00:12:24
			able to prove causation.
		
00:12:24 --> 00:12:26
			If you want to make a causative case,
		
00:12:26 --> 00:12:29
			a cause is something, when you say A
		
00:12:29 --> 00:12:32
			is the reason for B, it's the reason.
		
00:12:33 --> 00:12:34
			A correlation is different.
		
00:12:34 --> 00:12:37
			You could say, for example, okay, that it's
		
00:12:37 --> 00:12:40
			getting hot in July, but at the same
		
00:12:40 --> 00:12:43
			time, pumpkin sales are going higher.
		
00:12:43 --> 00:12:44
			There's no correlation.
		
00:12:44 --> 00:12:45
			There's no causation.
		
00:12:45 --> 00:12:46
			There's a correlation, but there's no causation.
		
00:12:47 --> 00:12:49
			But if it's Halloween time and it's October,
		
00:12:49 --> 00:12:51
			then you can make a causative case.
		
00:12:51 --> 00:12:54
			People are buying pumpkins because of Halloween.
		
00:12:54 --> 00:12:56
			Now, if you're making a causative case between
		
00:12:56 --> 00:12:58
			the religion of Islam on the one hand
		
00:12:58 --> 00:13:00
			and the grooming that took place on the
		
00:13:00 --> 00:13:03
			other, then what you need as a sociologist,
		
00:13:03 --> 00:13:05
			as a proper academic, is you need to
		
00:13:05 --> 00:13:08
			make a causative argument to show the link
		
00:13:08 --> 00:13:09
			between A and B.
		
00:13:10 --> 00:13:12
			And in this case, what would be sufficient,
		
00:13:12 --> 00:13:15
			or at least something to speak about, is
		
00:13:15 --> 00:13:19
			a testimony from these groomers themselves saying, we
		
00:13:19 --> 00:13:20
			were inspired by the hadith.
		
00:13:21 --> 00:13:22
			We don't believe it's haram.
		
00:13:22 --> 00:13:24
			We don't believe it's wrong to take these
		
00:13:24 --> 00:13:25
			white girls and to do this.
		
00:13:25 --> 00:13:28
			How comes from all of the reports that
		
00:13:28 --> 00:13:31
			I've read and all of the police reports
		
00:13:31 --> 00:13:33
			and the people that I've challenged in the
		
00:13:33 --> 00:13:36
			last two weeks, not one of them has
		
00:13:36 --> 00:13:39
			been able to show one single report in
		
00:13:39 --> 00:13:43
			the United Kingdom of someone citing religious reasons,
		
00:13:44 --> 00:13:46
			religious reasons for the reasons why they've done
		
00:13:46 --> 00:13:46
			that?
		
00:13:47 --> 00:13:50
			Whether obviously if they're non-Muslim, but if
		
00:13:50 --> 00:13:52
			they are Muslim, if they are Asian, we
		
00:13:52 --> 00:13:56
			don't find one single report of an individual
		
00:13:56 --> 00:13:59
			saying, I have been inspired, incentivized or otherwise
		
00:13:59 --> 00:14:01
			motivated by my religion.
		
00:14:02 --> 00:14:05
			The challenge, therefore, would be produce one report.
		
00:14:06 --> 00:14:08
			Surely you should have all these cases that
		
00:14:08 --> 00:14:11
			took place in Telford, in Rotherham, in Rochdale.
		
00:14:11 --> 00:14:14
			And there was over a thousand white girls
		
00:14:14 --> 00:14:19
			that were badly, badly abused by these horrible,
		
00:14:20 --> 00:14:25
			horrendous, horrific, monstrous, condemnable, abominable individuals.
		
00:14:26 --> 00:14:28
			Not one of those individuals has been able
		
00:14:28 --> 00:14:30
			to come with a single report saying that
		
00:14:30 --> 00:14:32
			the reason why I did this was because
		
00:14:32 --> 00:14:33
			of my religion.
		
00:14:33 --> 00:14:33
			How comes?
		
00:14:34 --> 00:14:35
			The fact that you have not been able
		
00:14:35 --> 00:14:38
			to produce one report like that means you
		
00:14:38 --> 00:14:40
			are disqualified from being able to make a
		
00:14:40 --> 00:14:42
			causative case, the like of which you have
		
00:14:42 --> 00:14:43
			tried to make.
		
00:14:43 --> 00:14:46
			And that's why there's no bona fide academic
		
00:14:46 --> 00:14:48
			that makes, by the way, the causative case.
		
00:14:48 --> 00:14:53
			Not one bona fide sociologist in peer-reviewed
		
00:14:53 --> 00:14:56
			journals that make the causative case because it's
		
00:14:56 --> 00:14:57
			too difficult to make.
		
00:14:57 --> 00:14:58
			They know that.
		
00:14:58 --> 00:15:00
			And in almost all the reports that have
		
00:15:00 --> 00:15:02
			been written by the CSA and the Home
		
00:15:02 --> 00:15:04
			Office and the Cobain report and this and
		
00:15:04 --> 00:15:06
			the book that she wrote in 2018, Ella
		
00:15:06 --> 00:15:09
			Cobain in 2018, none of that links the
		
00:15:09 --> 00:15:12
			grooming, Asian grooming gangs, et cetera, to the
		
00:15:12 --> 00:15:13
			religion of Islam.
		
00:15:13 --> 00:15:16
			So this man is academically inept.
		
00:15:16 --> 00:15:19
			He is incapable of reaching that level of
		
00:15:19 --> 00:15:20
			inquiry.
		
00:15:20 --> 00:15:22
			He's incapable of making the case.
		
00:15:22 --> 00:15:24
			He's creating a problem out of nothing.
		
00:15:24 --> 00:15:26
			And as I've mentioned, if his issue is
		
00:15:26 --> 00:15:29
			of that of men who are over a
		
00:15:29 --> 00:15:33
			certain age, being in sexual relationships with women
		
00:15:33 --> 00:15:36
			that are under the age of 18 or
		
00:15:36 --> 00:15:38
			even under the age of 16, then you've
		
00:15:38 --> 00:15:42
			got 300,000 cases, according to statistics from
		
00:15:42 --> 00:15:46
			the year 2008 and 2018 in the United
		
00:15:46 --> 00:15:49
			States of America itself, which by the way,
		
00:15:49 --> 00:15:51
			as we mentioned, the majority of the states
		
00:15:51 --> 00:15:54
			don't even have an age of consent or
		
00:15:54 --> 00:15:56
			they have an age of consent, which is
		
00:15:56 --> 00:15:57
			below the age of 18.
		
00:15:57 --> 00:15:57
			Okay.
		
00:15:58 --> 00:15:59
			What you have to worry about, why are
		
00:15:59 --> 00:16:01
			you worrying about what's happening in Telford and
		
00:16:01 --> 00:16:03
			Washtenaw and Rotherham, in these towns, by the
		
00:16:03 --> 00:16:05
			way, if you've been, they're not even cities
		
00:16:05 --> 00:16:08
			in the UK, where disenfranchised and poor people
		
00:16:08 --> 00:16:09
			are doing all kinds of mad stuff.
		
00:16:10 --> 00:16:12
			If you meet these people, you're going to
		
00:16:12 --> 00:16:12
			tell me they're religious.
		
00:16:12 --> 00:16:13
			They're not religious people.
		
00:16:13 --> 00:16:14
			These guys are thugs.
		
00:16:14 --> 00:16:17
			And they were giving alcohol and feeding, giving
		
00:16:17 --> 00:16:19
			alcohol and giving drugs to the girls and
		
00:16:19 --> 00:16:19
			stuff like that.
		
00:16:20 --> 00:16:22
			Is alcohol and drugs now become part of
		
00:16:22 --> 00:16:22
			the Islamic package?
		
00:16:22 --> 00:16:23
			I don't think so.
		
00:16:23 --> 00:16:26
			So I think that the fact that they're
		
00:16:26 --> 00:16:29
			making this case is pathetic and it's embarrassing
		
00:16:30 --> 00:16:32
			and it's something which they're only doing because
		
00:16:32 --> 00:16:34
			they're, they're prophet and they're true God.
		
00:16:35 --> 00:16:35
			Okay.
		
00:16:35 --> 00:16:38
			Elon Musk decided because of his H1B visa
		
00:16:38 --> 00:16:40
			situation to say such and such a thing.
		
00:16:41 --> 00:16:43
			But there'll be something coming out about Elon
		
00:16:43 --> 00:16:45
			Musk, which will shock the public, which I
		
00:16:45 --> 00:16:47
			will be publishing on Thursday, which will shock
		
00:16:47 --> 00:16:48
			the public.
		
00:16:48 --> 00:16:50
			It's the most scandalous thing and I'm keeping
		
00:16:50 --> 00:16:50
			it with me.
		
00:16:51 --> 00:16:52
			It will completely shock the British public.
		
00:16:53 --> 00:16:55
			It will come out in two days, it
		
00:16:55 --> 00:16:58
			will shock the entire public about Elon Musk
		
00:16:58 --> 00:16:59
			and I have the information and no one
		
00:16:59 --> 00:17:01
			else has the information that I have and
		
00:17:01 --> 00:17:04
			I'll be producing this information in two days
		
00:17:04 --> 00:17:06
			and people will be shocked to know what
		
00:17:06 --> 00:17:07
			happened.