Mohammed Hijab – Nigel Farage Goes After Muslims

Mohammed Hijab
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The increasing popularity of Islam in Norway is seen as a fundamental Christian religion, but there is no evidence that it is recognized as a means of achieving political political power. The speaker also discusses the definition of respect and tolerance in Islam, and the use of individuals's freedom to pursue personal liberty. While there is evidence of individual liberty, it is not a universal stance, and some countries do not consider it to be a terrorist organization. The speaker also mentions a new educational institution in Norway to act as a beacon of light.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:00 --> 00:00:02
			Hey you, are you wasting your time on
		
00:00:02 --> 00:00:05
			social media again? Your brothers and sisters in
		
00:00:05 --> 00:00:08
			the slam net from Norway are establishing a
		
00:00:08 --> 00:00:09
			Masjid, a dawah center.
		
00:00:10 --> 00:00:12
			Establishing a Masjid to convey the message of
		
00:00:12 --> 00:00:15
			Islam is one of the best deeds a
		
00:00:15 --> 00:00:17
			Muslim can do. There's a huge need for
		
00:00:17 --> 00:00:19
			it in Norway. You know this and I
		
00:00:19 --> 00:00:22
			know this, so that makes the reward even
		
00:00:22 --> 00:00:22
			greater.
		
00:00:23 --> 00:00:24
			So give generously and Allah
		
00:00:25 --> 00:00:27
			give you even more.
		
00:00:33 --> 00:00:36
			Assalamu Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuh. How are
		
00:00:36 --> 00:00:37
			you guys doing?
		
00:00:38 --> 00:00:42
			Right wing proponent Nigel Farage who was known
		
00:00:42 --> 00:00:44
			for his single issue, which was Brexit,
		
00:00:45 --> 00:00:47
			has now started to veer into different directions
		
00:00:47 --> 00:00:49
			and has, for some reason, started to comment
		
00:00:49 --> 00:00:50
			on Muslims
		
00:00:51 --> 00:00:52
			in Britain. Let's take a look at some
		
00:00:52 --> 00:00:54
			of the comments that he's made recently
		
00:00:54 --> 00:00:56
			and come back and respond
		
00:00:56 --> 00:00:58
			in kind. We have a growing number of
		
00:00:58 --> 00:01:00
			young people in country
		
00:01:00 --> 00:01:02
			who do not subscribe to British values. In
		
00:01:02 --> 00:01:05
			fact, loathe much of what we stand for.
		
00:01:05 --> 00:01:06
			So what do you do? Who are we
		
00:01:06 --> 00:01:08
			talking about then? Oh, I think we see
		
00:01:08 --> 00:01:10
			them on the streets of London every Saturday.
		
00:01:10 --> 00:01:12
			What do they look like? Oh, we're talking
		
00:01:12 --> 00:01:13
			about what do they look like? Are we
		
00:01:13 --> 00:01:16
			talking about Muslims here? We are. And and
		
00:01:16 --> 00:01:19
			I'm afraid I found some of the recent
		
00:01:19 --> 00:01:22
			surveys saying that 46% of British Muslims
		
00:01:22 --> 00:01:23
			support Hamas,
		
00:01:24 --> 00:01:25
			support the terrorist organization
		
00:01:26 --> 00:01:28
			that is described in this country.
		
00:01:28 --> 00:01:30
			So we've been and and and what's interesting
		
00:01:31 --> 00:01:32
			is that this prime minister
		
00:01:32 --> 00:01:33
			this prime
		
00:01:33 --> 00:01:36
			minister is building up far more of that
		
00:01:36 --> 00:01:39
			population than anybody before in history. Now many
		
00:01:39 --> 00:01:40
			things have been said,
		
00:01:40 --> 00:01:43
			by different people, proponents of media
		
00:01:43 --> 00:01:46
			and I've been following some of the comments
		
00:01:46 --> 00:01:48
			of, you know, some right wing people who
		
00:01:48 --> 00:01:51
			have actually said, quote unquote, well tell us
		
00:01:51 --> 00:01:53
			what he said that is wrong. I mean
		
00:01:53 --> 00:01:56
			he's saying that Muslims in this country who,
		
00:01:56 --> 00:01:57
			let's say, constitute about 7%
		
00:01:58 --> 00:01:59
			of the country's
		
00:02:00 --> 00:02:00
			population,
		
00:02:01 --> 00:02:03
			that Muslims in this country, the United Kingdom,
		
00:02:04 --> 00:02:06
			they don't respect fundamental British values
		
00:02:07 --> 00:02:09
			and that something needs to be done about
		
00:02:09 --> 00:02:10
			this. And he cited
		
00:02:10 --> 00:02:11
			as an example,
		
00:02:12 --> 00:02:13
			the amount of Muslims
		
00:02:14 --> 00:02:15
			who supported,
		
00:02:16 --> 00:02:16
			the proscribed
		
00:02:17 --> 00:02:19
			terrorist organization in the UK, Hamas,
		
00:02:19 --> 00:02:21
			as evidence for this.
		
00:02:21 --> 00:02:24
			Now the first question is what are fundamental
		
00:02:24 --> 00:02:25
			British values?
		
00:02:25 --> 00:02:27
			Fundamental British values
		
00:02:27 --> 00:02:29
			are 5 in number.
		
00:02:29 --> 00:02:32
			They are rule of law, tolerance,
		
00:02:32 --> 00:02:33
			democracy,
		
00:02:34 --> 00:02:35
			individual liberty and,
		
00:02:38 --> 00:02:38
			respect.
		
00:02:39 --> 00:02:41
			These are the 5, you know, bog standard
		
00:02:41 --> 00:02:42
			if you
		
00:02:42 --> 00:02:44
			like British values
		
00:02:44 --> 00:02:46
			that you have in national curricula
		
00:02:47 --> 00:02:48
			all around the country
		
00:02:48 --> 00:02:50
			and that are taught to students in this
		
00:02:50 --> 00:02:51
			country.
		
00:02:52 --> 00:02:53
			So if we ask the question, is it
		
00:02:53 --> 00:02:56
			the case that there is something inherent about
		
00:02:56 --> 00:02:57
			the religion of Islam
		
00:02:58 --> 00:02:59
			or about the Muslim communities,
		
00:03:00 --> 00:03:02
			or is there a sociological evidence to suggest
		
00:03:02 --> 00:03:05
			that those five aspects are in all respects
		
00:03:06 --> 00:03:08
			rejected by the Muslim community? I would say
		
00:03:08 --> 00:03:10
			that's actually an inaccurate
		
00:03:10 --> 00:03:13
			statement. Let's take the first thing, democracy for
		
00:03:13 --> 00:03:14
			example. Democracy
		
00:03:15 --> 00:03:18
			by the vast majority of traditionalist orthodox Muslim
		
00:03:19 --> 00:03:20
			commentators and scholars
		
00:03:21 --> 00:03:24
			is considered to be acceptable if used instrumentally.
		
00:03:25 --> 00:03:27
			Course it's not seen as an objective truth
		
00:03:27 --> 00:03:29
			in and of itself. I mean, Plato himself
		
00:03:29 --> 00:03:32
			had issues with democracy and there's philosophers even
		
00:03:32 --> 00:03:34
			in the western tradition that had issues with
		
00:03:34 --> 00:03:37
			democracy as a system, as an objective truth
		
00:03:37 --> 00:03:38
			or as a pragmatic
		
00:03:38 --> 00:03:39
			usage.
		
00:03:39 --> 00:03:42
			So democracy, it's not correct to
		
00:03:42 --> 00:03:45
			say that, well, Muslims reject democracy
		
00:03:46 --> 00:03:48
			and all the results of representative
		
00:03:48 --> 00:03:50
			democratic processes.
		
00:03:50 --> 00:03:52
			So I don't think that's we can put
		
00:03:52 --> 00:03:53
			that set aside for
		
00:03:54 --> 00:03:55
			now. Second thing you can say is respect.
		
00:03:56 --> 00:03:58
			There's nothing in the religion of Islam
		
00:03:58 --> 00:04:00
			which indicates that respect
		
00:04:01 --> 00:04:03
			is to be forgotten or is not to
		
00:04:03 --> 00:04:03
			be,
		
00:04:04 --> 00:04:04
			upheld
		
00:04:05 --> 00:04:05
			in fact
		
00:04:06 --> 00:04:08
			And this is a very subjective term. What
		
00:04:08 --> 00:04:09
			do we mean by
		
00:04:09 --> 00:04:10
			respect?
		
00:04:10 --> 00:04:13
			But if you're asking the question about Islam
		
00:04:13 --> 00:04:15
			and Muslim people in particular, there's nothing there
		
00:04:15 --> 00:04:18
			to suggest that. Number 3, if you talk
		
00:04:18 --> 00:04:19
			about tolerance,
		
00:04:19 --> 00:04:21
			well, I mean there are many verses in
		
00:04:21 --> 00:04:21
			the Quran
		
00:04:22 --> 00:04:22
			which
		
00:04:23 --> 00:04:25
			state quite explicitly and quite candidly that people
		
00:04:25 --> 00:04:28
			can live in whatever or using whatever system
		
00:04:28 --> 00:04:30
			they want to use for their life, whatever
		
00:04:30 --> 00:04:32
			world view they want to use. For example,
		
00:04:33 --> 00:04:35
			in chapter 109 of the Quran. You have
		
00:04:35 --> 00:04:37
			your religion, we have ours.
		
00:04:41 --> 00:04:42
			Whoever wants to can believe
		
00:04:42 --> 00:04:44
			and whoever wants to can disbelieve.
		
00:04:44 --> 00:04:46
			Where it's mentioned in chapter 2 verse 256
		
00:04:50 --> 00:04:51
			that
		
00:04:57 --> 00:04:58
			That there is no compulsion
		
00:04:59 --> 00:05:00
			in religion.
		
00:05:00 --> 00:05:04
			This is Islam. Islam does in fact state
		
00:05:04 --> 00:05:07
			that you know, we're not meant to convert
		
00:05:07 --> 00:05:09
			people forcibly in this way. So if we're
		
00:05:09 --> 00:05:10
			asking,
		
00:05:10 --> 00:05:11
			does Islam
		
00:05:12 --> 00:05:15
			practice tolerance? Yes. You'll say of course,
		
00:05:15 --> 00:05:18
			you you guys don't actually have tolerance towards
		
00:05:18 --> 00:05:20
			the LGBT community or this community that community.
		
00:05:20 --> 00:05:22
			With the British context or in the context
		
00:05:22 --> 00:05:26
			of the western world, there's no scholar or
		
00:05:26 --> 00:05:28
			reputable scholar across the world in Islam that
		
00:05:28 --> 00:05:29
			says that there shouldn't
		
00:05:30 --> 00:05:32
			be or there should be some kind of
		
00:05:32 --> 00:05:33
			intolerance practice
		
00:05:33 --> 00:05:36
			against members of communities which we disagree with
		
00:05:36 --> 00:05:38
			the practices of. For example, LGBTQ
		
00:05:38 --> 00:05:39
			communities, etcetera.
		
00:05:39 --> 00:05:41
			So I don't think there's enough evidence to
		
00:05:41 --> 00:05:42
			suggest
		
00:05:42 --> 00:05:45
			that on a sociological level, on a classical
		
00:05:45 --> 00:05:46
			Islamic level,
		
00:05:47 --> 00:05:47
			that
		
00:05:48 --> 00:05:50
			you know, tolerance is not upheld in Islam
		
00:05:51 --> 00:05:52
			and or by Muslims,
		
00:05:54 --> 00:05:56
			in the in the United Kingdom or anywhere
		
00:05:56 --> 00:05:57
			else in the
		
00:05:58 --> 00:06:01
			west. What about individual liberty? Now this is
		
00:06:01 --> 00:06:03
			connected obviously liberalism
		
00:06:03 --> 00:06:05
			with a small l as an ideology or
		
00:06:05 --> 00:06:07
			something I've spoken about at length is not
		
00:06:07 --> 00:06:09
			something which is compatible with Islam in the
		
00:06:10 --> 00:06:12
			broad sense. But individual liberty if we're talking
		
00:06:12 --> 00:06:14
			about people to choose whatever they want in
		
00:06:14 --> 00:06:18
			the western context. Once again there's no scholar
		
00:06:18 --> 00:06:21
			worth his salt or her salt that would
		
00:06:21 --> 00:06:23
			say that such a thing is,
		
00:06:23 --> 00:06:25
			we we should rebel against it in the
		
00:06:25 --> 00:06:26
			western context.
		
00:06:27 --> 00:06:29
			So really and truly here, and rule of
		
00:06:29 --> 00:06:32
			law of course, rule of law, scholars are
		
00:06:32 --> 00:06:33
			very explicit
		
00:06:33 --> 00:06:34
			that you should obey the law of the
		
00:06:34 --> 00:06:36
			land so long as it does not contradict
		
00:06:36 --> 00:06:37
			Islamic law,
		
00:06:38 --> 00:06:39
			if you're living here. So you could make
		
00:06:39 --> 00:06:42
			the argument actually that fundamental British values
		
00:06:43 --> 00:06:43
			from one
		
00:06:44 --> 00:06:47
			angle or from one respect is not something
		
00:06:47 --> 00:06:47
			we
		
00:06:49 --> 00:06:51
			are in opposition to from that perspective, from
		
00:06:51 --> 00:06:54
			the pragmatic or contextual perspective. Of course, if
		
00:06:54 --> 00:06:55
			you go deeper, you could say there are
		
00:06:55 --> 00:06:56
			points of tension
		
00:06:57 --> 00:06:59
			as an objective reality. So that's one thing.
		
00:06:59 --> 00:07:01
			Then he cites, well, 46%
		
00:07:02 --> 00:07:02
			of people
		
00:07:03 --> 00:07:03
			believe
		
00:07:04 --> 00:07:07
			he says 46 percent, you know, Muslims believe,
		
00:07:08 --> 00:07:10
			or support Hamas. Well, I just looked at
		
00:07:10 --> 00:07:13
			a study done by YouGov which is seen
		
00:07:13 --> 00:07:15
			as a reputable and credible
		
00:07:15 --> 00:07:16
			organization
		
00:07:17 --> 00:07:18
			that says that
		
00:07:18 --> 00:07:20
			of the people that support Palestine
		
00:07:20 --> 00:07:22
			in Britain as a whole, 14%
		
00:07:23 --> 00:07:25
			of them actually supported Hamas. Now that can't
		
00:07:25 --> 00:07:26
			be
		
00:07:26 --> 00:07:28
			constitutive of the entire Muslim
		
00:07:29 --> 00:07:30
			because there's only 7% of Muslims in the
		
00:07:30 --> 00:07:32
			UK. Which shows you that there are people
		
00:07:32 --> 00:07:34
			who support Hamas who are not Muslims in
		
00:07:34 --> 00:07:35
			the United Kingdom.
		
00:07:35 --> 00:07:36
			This is
		
00:07:37 --> 00:07:39
			unusual. You could you could argue because it's
		
00:07:39 --> 00:07:41
			a proscribed terrorist organization.
		
00:07:41 --> 00:07:43
			But suffice it for me to say, it's
		
00:07:43 --> 00:07:45
			not a proscribed terrorist organization in the majority
		
00:07:45 --> 00:07:47
			of the world. I mean, Hamas is not
		
00:07:47 --> 00:07:48
			this is a fact.
		
00:07:48 --> 00:07:50
			Majority of countries do not consider them to
		
00:07:50 --> 00:07:52
			be a prescribed terrorist. In fact, Switzerland for
		
00:07:52 --> 00:07:53
			the longest of time
		
00:07:53 --> 00:07:55
			and Norway for the longest of time. These
		
00:07:55 --> 00:07:57
			are European countries did not consider them to
		
00:07:57 --> 00:07:59
			be terrorist organization. I think they may have
		
00:07:59 --> 00:08:02
			changed that recently, but the point is just
		
00:08:02 --> 00:08:03
			because something
		
00:08:03 --> 00:08:05
			is seen as a prescribed terrorist organization. It
		
00:08:05 --> 00:08:08
			doesn't mean to say that the people who
		
00:08:08 --> 00:08:10
			support that group are necessarily against fundamental British
		
00:08:10 --> 00:08:12
			values the like of which we've just mentioned.
		
00:08:12 --> 00:08:13
			It's actually
		
00:08:14 --> 00:08:14
			conceivable
		
00:08:15 --> 00:08:18
			that someone could could make a case for
		
00:08:18 --> 00:08:18
			Hamas
		
00:08:18 --> 00:08:21
			as a non prescribed terrorist organization
		
00:08:21 --> 00:08:22
			which many have and
		
00:08:23 --> 00:08:24
			still
		
00:08:24 --> 00:08:27
			claim at least to uphold fundamental
		
00:08:27 --> 00:08:28
			British
		
00:08:28 --> 00:08:30
			values. That's the first thing. The second point
		
00:08:30 --> 00:08:32
			which is very important
		
00:08:32 --> 00:08:33
			is that the same
		
00:08:34 --> 00:08:37
			tensions which may exist with the dominant ethic
		
00:08:37 --> 00:08:38
			of the West
		
00:08:39 --> 00:08:42
			and Islam could also said to be existing
		
00:08:42 --> 00:08:43
			within Judaism
		
00:08:44 --> 00:08:46
			and the dominant ethic of the West which
		
00:08:46 --> 00:08:46
			is say liberalism,
		
00:08:47 --> 00:08:48
			classical liberalism.
		
00:08:49 --> 00:08:50
			So if you wanted to make a case
		
00:08:50 --> 00:08:52
			about Muslims because of lack of integration
		
00:08:53 --> 00:08:55
			say or opposition to what you consider to
		
00:08:55 --> 00:08:57
			be fundamental British values and or the dominant
		
00:08:57 --> 00:08:58
			ethic of the
		
00:08:59 --> 00:09:01
			West then you could say the same thing
		
00:09:01 --> 00:09:03
			about Orthodox Jews and this is something that
		
00:09:03 --> 00:09:06
			Abdul Andalusi recently came on GB News and
		
00:09:06 --> 00:09:08
			you know done a fantastic job in being
		
00:09:08 --> 00:09:09
			able to
		
00:09:09 --> 00:09:12
			expound on in great detail and you can
		
00:09:12 --> 00:09:14
			see his video in the link below.
		
00:09:15 --> 00:09:17
			And that is enough for the SOPA analysis
		
00:09:17 --> 00:09:20
			for us to say, I'm sorry to say,
		
00:09:20 --> 00:09:21
			Faraj, you have not been able to make
		
00:09:21 --> 00:09:23
			the case in a strong enough manner.
		
00:09:24 --> 00:09:27
			And to specialize this, to to make a
		
00:09:27 --> 00:09:29
			remarkable case of the Muslim community and peculiarize
		
00:09:30 --> 00:09:30
			and otherwise
		
00:09:31 --> 00:09:34
			the Muslim community above and beyond other communities
		
00:09:34 --> 00:09:36
			like the Jewish community or other communities even
		
00:09:36 --> 00:09:38
			the maybe the Sikh community, Orthodox Sikh communities
		
00:09:39 --> 00:09:40
			and other maybe,
		
00:09:41 --> 00:09:41
			even
		
00:09:42 --> 00:09:45
			evangelical Christian communities within the west. I think
		
00:09:45 --> 00:09:46
			speaks volumes
		
00:09:46 --> 00:09:47
			about your
		
00:09:48 --> 00:09:48
			disingenuity
		
00:09:49 --> 00:09:50
			and it speaks volumes about
		
00:09:51 --> 00:09:53
			how you perceive Muslims in this country, and
		
00:09:53 --> 00:09:56
			it may even speak volumes about maybe who
		
00:09:56 --> 00:09:58
			could be and this may be a question
		
00:09:58 --> 00:09:59
			I should ask you, is paying you? Who's
		
00:09:59 --> 00:10:00
			paying you,
		
00:10:00 --> 00:10:02
			to speak like this? Because back in the
		
00:10:02 --> 00:10:05
			days, you and Robinson and others used to
		
00:10:05 --> 00:10:07
			all have this very patriotic
		
00:10:07 --> 00:10:09
			pro Britain approach and it seems to me
		
00:10:09 --> 00:10:11
			the parliament is changing isn't it Nigel? Now
		
00:10:11 --> 00:10:13
			it seems to me that you're more concerned
		
00:10:13 --> 00:10:15
			with Israel and foreign politics than you are
		
00:10:15 --> 00:10:18
			with national politics of Great Britain. That's what
		
00:10:18 --> 00:10:19
			I will say.
		
00:10:20 --> 00:10:22
			Your brothers and sisters in the slam net
		
00:10:22 --> 00:10:23
			from Norway are
		
00:10:24 --> 00:10:26
			establishing a masjid, a dower center.
		
00:10:27 --> 00:10:29
			This center, this masjid, this educational
		
00:10:29 --> 00:10:33
			institution will act like a beacon of light,
		
00:10:33 --> 00:10:35
			calling the Muslims in Norway back to the
		
00:10:35 --> 00:10:36
			essence of Islam.
		
00:10:37 --> 00:10:38
			So give generously and Allah
		
00:10:39 --> 00:10:41
			will give you even more.