Mohammed Hijab – Are White People Smarter than Black People

			Why do you keep using this as an example, let's say
		

			that white finish black white,
		

			black people are less intelligent than white people as a result of their results on IQ tests as a
collective group, and that's, that's indicative. that's indicative of a genetic. Go to Google.
Please, please come down, please just keep laughing. But I just want to you saying that it's
problematic on account of the following
		

			IQ tests themselves are not compliant with the scientific method.
		

			Let me explain to you
		

			the IQ test itself is a configuration
		

			which is susceptible to human critique and or amendment while correct. Therefore, using it as an
exact measure for peak human intelligence currently, as a current measure is unjustified, especially
considering let me let me explain Let me explain, especially considering, excuse me, especially
considering that those who constructed the IQ test themselves were people who might have had biases?
Well,
		

			let me give an example. Let me give an example. Right, and this is not something let me give an
example.
		

			Is bilingualism or multilingualism, included in the IQ test? Or my question? is included? Yes. No,
no, no, it's no it's not. Now, here's here's the point do black people do?
		

			Do black people have a higher or lesser chance of being bilingual or multilingual than a white man?
		

			Okay, please, please. No, no, no, no.
		

			No.
		

			asking a question. Does a black man in Africa have a higher or lesser chance of being bilingual or
multilingual than a white man? And you
		

			know, it's not equal? No, it's not? No, it's not.
		

			ralphie Ralph is not equal.
		

			Sorry, Ralph. Sorry. So I apologize.
		

			I apologize.
		

			I'm sorry. Let's use it.
		

			Let's be specific. Let's be specific. The Western European example Western Europe, I'm gonna be very
specific. I'm talking about this colonial narrative of especially Western Europe. Okay. And I think
they have to understand something brother. Yeah. You have to really understand these, you know,
these eugenics programs that they did, and what do you call it in Germany? Yeah. Where they branded,
they had, you know, the the supreme race, the white man with the blue eyes and so on. And this is
the, you know, the ideal that when it comes
		

			to people, so she will know, you she would know, she would know, she would know what her parents are
forefathers and they would have been, they would have been part of this, right. So that the idea of
the idea of the white man with the blue eyes, the white man with the blue eyes being the the apex
		

			of the boogeyman that scares you that points not.
		

			haven't completed my sentence. Oh, yeah. Right. I'm not saying that just because it's provided a
justification. I'm saying that this? I'm not making that point. I could say that.
		

			Sorry, I could have made the point. I said, I'm not going to be morally sanctimonious and say, well,
that's how they justified the burning of the Ashkenazi Jews who said it was the highest IQ and he
was ironic.
		

			To me, but But yeah,
		

			the point is,
		

			the the the inherent biases in those scientific practices
		

			from German scientists, reflected upon subsequent subsequent results of so called scientific
discoveries. So therefore, you have to understand, number one, how science can be very biased. You
really need to take a minute, let me summarize or summarize what you
		

			Give me. Give me Give me one minute, just one minute, and then you could talk for two minutes.
		

			One minute, okay. To summarize, your science itself, can be used by racist people. And then those
racist people can then use the word data to make it seem as if science has it. This is a legitimate
racism. Now moving on to social sciences, which is even weaker, it's more feeble than science. Yes,
because it attempts to mimic it. It's a cheap copy. It's a pseudoscience according to Karl Popper.
		

			And then the resulting placement tests which are called IQ tests, which are put in place to try and
measure people's intelligence collectivise them and then justify further racism,
		

			which is what you're saying phase two might be if not for you, but someone else would say phase two
of the program was really hitting the point. No, no, it's not. It's not finished.
		

			Yet, so you have to justify why the parameters included in the IQ
		

			Tests are the best possible parameters when they don't include those things which black people or
people of color would have his advantage would have his advantages over and above white people and
do link and hold on and do link to intelligence, according to a majority of studies that have been
done on it so that can you answer that question? So let me know. Yeah, about 20 minutes.
		

			One minute. Yeah, before the one minute, we could do a video.
		

			I let me stop. I could use papa. And your question the scientific method, you're questioning
basically Western civilization, which is which brand is standing on, let me tell you about Western
civilization. So when he ended, what you're referring to loosely is logical positivism and
Wittgenstein and popper down the road, and everyone else. This was still 40 years before the
invention of computer science. We see people like myself as two types of chimps in this world, those
who get theoretical computer science and those that don't. The scientific method is just an
algorithm. It's a classified, not alternative hypotheses or algorithms one but type one type two and
		

			arrows are algorithms methodological independence algorithms, logical positivism algorithm, the
Trinity v style and
		

			the Trinity. That populated with three world models, there are three worlds. One is the physical
world, which I will measure using science and computer science as the time of the universe 15
billion years plus our space time continuum. As you realize chimps in a data point time t, then are
looking at evolution stopped by becoming computational science models. This abstraction in World War
Two is measured by conscious creatures in the UI as to chimps, either those are processing levels,
that Trinity that creates us tells us that from a gene
		

			to sell to chimp Shabbat, you get $20 if I forced you into your saliva using 40, bandages, your
saliva in 23 years.
		

			You Mohamad the job is 20,000 to see which tribe you came from down from Pumped on Amalia will find
every gene Bo, and I will see your propensity for diabetes from low to neuron disease. For heart, I
will live in using medicine as deputy chairman. When you enter data space as I'll just move on.
		

			This is the data if you don't like it. You say racism, because obviously you will have to form
allies with the left while you're still visiting. Who's your your your engine? Yeah.
		

			No, no, you're Indian.
		

			You're an Indian. You're a colonial subjects. That's colonial subject myself versus Christian. Who
are you problem? Yeah. Okay. Can you please have a must
		

			have a Christian?
		

			Krishna, Krishna here.
		

			That's a political discussion.
		

			In the Christian Western science, in that Christian, we have data, and we're going to look at the
data on racism and some left wing view of my racism
		

			doesn't interest me?
		

			I apologize. I didn't accuse you of racism.
		

			I told you today I'm not going to be morally sanctimonious. I'll let that for other people to talk
about right. And having accused you of racism, by the way, racism is a neutral term. Everyone's
racist. No, hold on, hold on. Why mean by racism being a neutral term, it doesn't have to be
necessarily derogatory depending on how you define it and how its expressed. racism. Racism is just
an expression of a collective of group, a collective, referring themselves referring to themselves.
So self identifying or being referred to or respect strong,
		

			referring to themselves being self identified or being referred to as others as say, for instance,
black or white or whatever, being oppressed through power relations or otherwise by other people and
or being discriminated against. Now, that could have undertones which are political, but could also
be something which is neutral to us. My question to you, which you couldn't answer and you started
talking about algorithms? Was was the fact No, no, no, it was the fact that how can you justify
making my question, how can you justify because I haven't finished my question. How can you justify
making overarching generalizations about intelligence when the systems and methods although the
		

			systems and methods
		

			by the way, I did let us
		

			know?
		

			You're thinking in a linear way.
		

			You're thinking there's no objective.
		

			I've not told you about my emotions. So you're talking about something else? No. Have I said I feel
this way. Oh,
		

			my God. No, no, no, I'm not saying I cute. I'm not talking about you. Now. What I'm saying is this.
My claim is very rough. You expect me to say certain things because you hear that from the left
		

			I'm not left wing guy. I don't hold on. I'm not.
		

			I'm not I don't identify with the left or the right. I don't identify with any of that. Yeah, no,
no, I don't believe so. Yeah, I really genuinely don't believe so I disagree with that completely.
But what I was gonna say was this, ya know, and we're not we're not left to write we don't go in
your, your spectrum, your political spectrum. We don't have to fit nicely within. Yeah, yeah. Yeah.
So what I was gonna say was this. Yeah. Was the point I was making you keep using was like data on
objective truth and emotions, right? No, it's not. It's an easy, it's an easy argument to win
against someone who doesn't know what they're talking about. But if you're talking to someone who's
		

			done social sciences, and spent many years doing so like myself, and I can tell you, Patrick is no,
no, no, no, no, I'm not not to be funny, but not to be funny. But I've got the credentials from
those guys that you take as, as authority. Yeah.
		

			I do have those credentials, if you want me to show them to you as well, even even if we don't talk
about that. And I say to you, look, the issue is this.
		

			The issue is that you're using a measure, which is a byproduct, listen to me carefully. It's a but
it's a byproduct of a of a social science that was done from
		

			your you're not listening to my you're not listening to my objection. It's a but the IQ test is not
cannot be seen as an incorrigible test. That is, that is incapable of being amended in the future.
		

			Moreover, and moreover, therefore, to categorize races as, as a result of their performances on IQ
tests, when for knowing full well that within the parameters of IQ test, certain things like
bilingualism and multilingualism, is not included.
		

			You're not you're not
		

			you're not listening, you're simply not listening. I will say to you, no, I'm gonna make this
statement right now. I'm gonna say to you that people that can speak two languages are cleverer in
my eyes than people that can speak one. Okay. Yes, colonial people that have been colonized by the
West and others, because in 1914, according to one of your great scholars, his name is homi Bhabha,
I'm not sure if you've heard of him. Yeah, he's a he's a postcolonial. I think it's my 85% of
people.
		

			85% of the world was colonized by a few European countries. 85% a lot of people have colonial
amnesia, you have colonial amnesia, you don't remember the fact
		

			that you do have, because you don't know the extent to which colonial powers that are have affected
educational systems of measuring intelligence and giving intelligence.
		

			So that compartmentalization, collectivization and then exploitation can be continued in the post
colonial narrative. Now, here's the point. That's why they do it. Now, I'm saying something very
simply, that in Western Europe, the people that were meant to see us the Superman, the, you know,
the the Superman with a blue eyes and the white skin.
		

			The Indonesian word, the Uber meant that those individuals are meant to be the apex. Yeah, those
individuals who are meant to be the apex of human civilization, because of their schools and IQ
tests, which have been rigged so that they can be the
		

			IQ test can be rigged.
		

			To be able to summarize
		

			IQ tests, I'm not I'm not, I'm not falling for that. I'm not falling for that.
		

			Would you take an IQ test live streaming?
		

			Will you take an IQ test?
		

			Now,
		

			don't talk about IQ test? I've done enough tests in this country for 10 years. Yeah.
		

			The point is this, if I if you if you if you agree with me that people that know more than one
language, on everything, saying the same, would be more intelligent than one language. The question
I asked why the question I asked is, why haven't Why has the elitist Westerners not put language
ability in the IQ test?
		

			The reason the reason why, the reason why is because black people are gonna go higher off in that
test, and Ashkenazi Jews are gonna go down. Yeah, goodbye. Thank you very much. Thank you very much.
		

			Thank you.