Mirza Yawar Baig – Turn a mistake into a learning opportunity #2

Mirza Yawar Baig
AI: Summary ©
The speakers discuss the importance of honoring children and treating them with respect. They stress the need for parents to understand the situation and use the process of reasoning to make a decision. The speaker emphasizes the importance of learning from past experiences and identifying the benefits of not making up, as well as learning from past experiences to avoid future mistakes and turning mistakes into opportunities for learning.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:14 --> 00:00:16

We continue with our

00:00:17 --> 00:00:20

answering the question that Omar Abdullah

00:00:22 --> 00:00:23

bless him and keep him protected.

00:00:25 --> 00:00:26

Asked me

00:00:26 --> 00:00:27

about the

00:00:29 --> 00:00:29

permissibility,

00:00:30 --> 00:00:32

the advice with regard to.

00:00:36 --> 00:00:37

Basically, is it

00:00:40 --> 00:00:41

permissible to reprimand,

00:00:42 --> 00:00:44

especially we're talking now here about children.

00:00:45 --> 00:00:46

Maybe you're coaching

00:00:48 --> 00:00:50

a a team of some sports team. Maybe

00:00:50 --> 00:00:51

you are

00:00:52 --> 00:00:52

a teacher in school.

00:00:54 --> 00:00:56

Maybe your own children and your neighbors and

00:00:56 --> 00:00:59

nieces and grandchildren and so on. Is it

00:00:59 --> 00:00:59

permissible

00:01:00 --> 00:01:00

to

00:01:01 --> 00:01:04

reprimand them if, they need that? Is it

00:01:04 --> 00:01:07

possible to correct them? Is it possible to,

00:01:08 --> 00:01:09

you know, to tell them

00:01:10 --> 00:01:12

that they are doing or they have done

00:01:12 --> 00:01:15

wrong? Is it permissible to ask them why

00:01:15 --> 00:01:16

they did what they did?

00:01:17 --> 00:01:18

In the light of

00:01:19 --> 00:01:20

the hadith of Anasid

00:01:20 --> 00:01:21

who

00:01:21 --> 00:01:23

said that he served

00:01:23 --> 00:01:24

for 10 years,

00:01:25 --> 00:01:27

and never even said oof to him, and

00:01:27 --> 00:01:28

he never asked him,

00:01:29 --> 00:01:31

why did he do whatever he did.

00:01:33 --> 00:01:34

So this is the second part of the

00:01:34 --> 00:01:36

answer. 2nd part of the answer, I'm saying

00:01:36 --> 00:01:37

here that,

00:01:39 --> 00:01:40

in the case of the hadith, we're looking

00:01:40 --> 00:01:42

at an exceptional human being,

00:01:44 --> 00:01:46

who was in 24

00:01:46 --> 00:01:47

hour immersion

00:01:48 --> 00:01:48

program

00:01:49 --> 00:01:51

program with himself.

00:01:54 --> 00:01:55

His

00:01:55 --> 00:01:57

was never even handed over

00:01:58 --> 00:01:59

to another person.

00:02:00 --> 00:02:02

There's no narrative to say,

00:02:03 --> 00:02:04

yeah, Abba Baqal

00:02:05 --> 00:02:07

of the Al Anwar, take over the of

00:02:08 --> 00:02:09

this young man

00:02:10 --> 00:02:11

or this boy. Never.

00:02:12 --> 00:02:14

Was under the direct,

00:02:17 --> 00:02:17

of Rasoolullah.

00:02:19 --> 00:02:22

So my question to myself anyway is how

00:02:22 --> 00:02:23

many times do you think he did anything

00:02:23 --> 00:02:25

in the first place which required,

00:02:26 --> 00:02:28

Rasool Allah to every mandate? So that's the

00:02:28 --> 00:02:30

first thing to keep in mind.

00:02:30 --> 00:02:32

Second thing to keep in mind is that

00:02:32 --> 00:02:34

when we are looking at,

00:02:35 --> 00:02:36

we are looking

00:02:38 --> 00:02:39

at the responsibility

00:02:40 --> 00:02:40

of parents.

00:02:41 --> 00:02:42

Parents do not have

00:02:43 --> 00:02:46

and teachers do not have their position because,

00:02:49 --> 00:02:51

parent don't have that position just because they

00:02:51 --> 00:02:53

happen to be biological parents.

00:02:53 --> 00:02:55

Teachers don't have that position just because they

00:02:55 --> 00:02:56

happen to be appointed,

00:02:57 --> 00:02:59

as a teacher of the mother's or the

00:03:00 --> 00:03:01

class or the school.

00:03:02 --> 00:03:05

They have that exalted position. They have that

00:03:05 --> 00:03:06

position of honor

00:03:07 --> 00:03:09

because of what they do and what they

00:03:09 --> 00:03:10

are supposed to do.

00:03:10 --> 00:03:12

And that is.

00:03:13 --> 00:03:13

And

00:03:14 --> 00:03:15

consists of,

00:03:16 --> 00:03:17

when required,

00:03:17 --> 00:03:18

of

00:03:18 --> 00:03:19

connecting,

00:03:19 --> 00:03:20

of

00:03:20 --> 00:03:22

guiding, of mentoring,

00:03:22 --> 00:03:24

of, if necessary, reprimanding.

00:03:25 --> 00:03:27

So there is nothing to feel apologetic about

00:03:27 --> 00:03:28

that. The question is, how do you do

00:03:28 --> 00:03:29

that?

00:03:30 --> 00:03:31

Now one of the things that I, for

00:03:31 --> 00:03:33

example and I'm not placing myself as the

00:03:33 --> 00:03:35

ideal model of, of.

00:03:36 --> 00:03:39

I'm just sharing my personal experience of having

00:03:40 --> 00:03:41

done that for,

00:03:42 --> 00:03:42

several,

00:03:44 --> 00:03:44

unfortunates,

00:03:45 --> 00:03:46

in my life.

00:03:50 --> 00:03:51

There's a rule that I follow. The first

00:03:51 --> 00:03:53

rule I follow is that I treat the

00:03:53 --> 00:03:55

child with respect.

00:03:56 --> 00:03:58

I never abuse the child. I never call

00:03:58 --> 00:03:59

him names. I never curse

00:04:00 --> 00:04:02

him, or her no matter what they did.

00:04:02 --> 00:04:03

I always treat them with

00:04:04 --> 00:04:06

respect. Second thing is that

00:04:06 --> 00:04:08

I always operate from

00:04:08 --> 00:04:09

the,

00:04:10 --> 00:04:12

belief and from the position that

00:04:13 --> 00:04:15

let us find the reason why something happened

00:04:15 --> 00:04:18

before we decide to judge that thing.

00:04:19 --> 00:04:21

So I always ask the question, why did

00:04:21 --> 00:04:22

you do this?

00:04:23 --> 00:04:24

Whatever the thing is. Right?

00:04:24 --> 00:04:26

It doesn't matter what it was. Why did

00:04:26 --> 00:04:28

you do this? Why did you behave in

00:04:28 --> 00:04:29

this way in this way?

00:04:31 --> 00:04:33

Number 1. Then second thing I do is

00:04:33 --> 00:04:35

and then I lead the child

00:04:36 --> 00:04:37

through is

00:04:38 --> 00:04:39

a

00:04:39 --> 00:04:39

a,

00:04:40 --> 00:04:42

system and through a process of

00:04:43 --> 00:04:43

reasoning,

00:04:44 --> 00:04:46

which shows them that

00:04:47 --> 00:04:49

at the time they did whatever they did,

00:04:50 --> 00:04:51

they had other alternatives.

00:04:52 --> 00:04:55

They could have chosen to do something else.

00:04:56 --> 00:04:58

The way they dealt with that situation was

00:04:58 --> 00:05:00

not the only thing

00:05:01 --> 00:05:03

that was available, that was not the only

00:05:03 --> 00:05:06

option available to them. They could have chosen

00:05:06 --> 00:05:08

equally easily to deal with it in a

00:05:08 --> 00:05:10

different way. And I don't tell them what

00:05:10 --> 00:05:11

that way is. I just tell them, okay.

00:05:11 --> 00:05:13

So when you for example,

00:05:15 --> 00:05:17

you you you had a fight with your

00:05:17 --> 00:05:18

with your,

00:05:18 --> 00:05:20

you know, classmate.

00:05:21 --> 00:05:23

He beat you up. You beat him up.

00:05:23 --> 00:05:25

Whatever whatever the case was, you cussed him

00:05:25 --> 00:05:25

out.

00:05:27 --> 00:05:28

So why why did that happen? So there's

00:05:29 --> 00:05:30

oh, no. No. No. And I usually get

00:05:30 --> 00:05:32

the other person there as well, if I

00:05:32 --> 00:05:34

can possibly do that. So then I'll get

00:05:34 --> 00:05:36

this one. No. No. I'm not talking about

00:05:36 --> 00:05:38

the fight is over. Right? Now we are

00:05:38 --> 00:05:38

analyzing that.

00:05:39 --> 00:05:40

So think about that.

00:05:41 --> 00:05:42

Why did this fight happen? So these are

00:05:42 --> 00:05:44

the reasons. Okay. Fantastic.

00:05:46 --> 00:05:46

What

00:05:47 --> 00:05:49

were the options available to you at that

00:05:49 --> 00:05:51

time? Was cursing and fighting the only option?

00:05:52 --> 00:05:54

Could you have dealt with that in some

00:05:54 --> 00:05:55

other way?

00:05:56 --> 00:05:58

What were you trying to achieve

00:05:59 --> 00:06:01

when you went into this thing? Did you

00:06:01 --> 00:06:03

have a a goal in mind, a plan

00:06:03 --> 00:06:04

in mind, and were you trying to achieve

00:06:04 --> 00:06:05

something?

00:06:05 --> 00:06:07

Or this was just, you know, just got

00:06:07 --> 00:06:09

angry and it blew.

00:06:09 --> 00:06:10

What was it?

00:06:12 --> 00:06:14

And then I finally come, I say, okay.

00:06:14 --> 00:06:16

Now now that this is over, now that

00:06:16 --> 00:06:18

we have learned the

00:06:18 --> 00:06:19

lessons, now that the,

00:06:20 --> 00:06:21

the the thing is over,

00:06:21 --> 00:06:22

what do you wanna do?

00:06:23 --> 00:06:25

Do you wanna make up? Do you want

00:06:25 --> 00:06:26

to be friends again?

00:06:26 --> 00:06:29

What are the options of, and and the

00:06:29 --> 00:06:31

benefits of making up? What are the benefits

00:06:31 --> 00:06:32

or harmful

00:06:33 --> 00:06:34

facts of not making up?

00:06:35 --> 00:06:36

Believe me,

00:06:37 --> 00:06:38

this whole

00:06:38 --> 00:06:39

process of

00:06:40 --> 00:06:41

what happened,

00:06:41 --> 00:06:42

why did it happened,

00:06:43 --> 00:06:44

what were the options,

00:06:45 --> 00:06:47

and what do you want to do about

00:06:47 --> 00:06:48

that now

00:06:48 --> 00:06:49

going forward?

00:06:49 --> 00:06:52

This is a process incidentally I also use

00:06:52 --> 00:06:53

in my corporate consulting,

00:06:54 --> 00:06:55

in my coaching.

00:06:56 --> 00:06:58

It's not only restricted to children

00:06:58 --> 00:07:02

because this is the real learning process.

00:07:02 --> 00:07:03

It takes time.

00:07:04 --> 00:07:06

It takes far more time than calling both

00:07:06 --> 00:07:09

the kids and giving each of, you know,

00:07:09 --> 00:07:11

both of them whack on the behind or

00:07:11 --> 00:07:13

something. That's easy. Like it that takes like

00:07:13 --> 00:07:15

10 seconds. One whack to this one, one

00:07:15 --> 00:07:16

black to that person.

00:07:18 --> 00:07:20

All that would have been achieved is that

00:07:20 --> 00:07:22

you got rid of your frustration.

00:07:24 --> 00:07:26

The children learned

00:07:27 --> 00:07:30

to avoid you. The children learned to run

00:07:30 --> 00:07:32

away from you. The children learned that

00:07:32 --> 00:07:34

what I did was not wrong,

00:07:34 --> 00:07:37

but getting caught was the problem. So next

00:07:37 --> 00:07:38

time, I'm gonna make

00:07:38 --> 00:07:41

sure that I do not get caught. And

00:07:41 --> 00:07:43

since I'm not God, there's no way that

00:07:43 --> 00:07:44

I'm going to be able to,

00:07:44 --> 00:07:46

supervise those kids 247.

00:07:47 --> 00:07:49

So now I've got a bunch of youngsters

00:07:49 --> 00:07:52

who are resentful, who have learned nothing,

00:07:52 --> 00:07:54

and whose focus now is on not getting

00:07:55 --> 00:07:56

caught, not on

00:07:56 --> 00:07:57

correcting themselves.

00:07:58 --> 00:08:00

They see no value and benefit in that.

00:08:00 --> 00:08:02

They consider themselves to have been right.

00:08:02 --> 00:08:05

Maybe a bit stupid because they got caught

00:08:05 --> 00:08:07

not because of what they did and that's

00:08:07 --> 00:08:09

an entirely undesirable outcome.

00:08:10 --> 00:08:12

But when you follow this process, you'll find,

00:08:12 --> 00:08:14

and I've always found invariably

00:08:15 --> 00:08:17

that there's a huge amount of learning both

00:08:17 --> 00:08:19

for them and for me. I'm saying for

00:08:19 --> 00:08:21

me because one of the

00:08:21 --> 00:08:23

salutary facts in my life is that when

00:08:23 --> 00:08:25

I ask do this question of,

00:08:25 --> 00:08:26

asking the kids,

00:08:27 --> 00:08:29

why did did you do something?

00:08:29 --> 00:08:31

Sometimes, I'm not saying all the time, but

00:08:31 --> 00:08:34

sometimes I find answers that are so

00:08:35 --> 00:08:37

refreshing. They're so absolutely

00:08:38 --> 00:08:39

out of the blue.

00:08:40 --> 00:08:42

It wouldn't it would never have occurred to

00:08:42 --> 00:08:45

me to say what the child is saying.

00:08:45 --> 00:08:47

I would never have seen that thing in

00:08:47 --> 00:08:49

that light. And the reason is very simple

00:08:49 --> 00:08:50

because

00:08:50 --> 00:08:51

my,

00:08:51 --> 00:08:54

perception is colored by my conditioning. The

00:08:55 --> 00:08:58

child does not have that conditioning yet. So

00:08:58 --> 00:09:00

before that child gets the Right?

00:09:04 --> 00:09:04

And

00:09:09 --> 00:09:11

Right? And then the result is fine because,

00:09:11 --> 00:09:12

you know, they've learned the lesson and they

00:09:12 --> 00:09:14

won't repeat it again. They're not stupid. Now

00:09:14 --> 00:09:16

the same thing as I said I do

00:09:16 --> 00:09:18

also in my corporate consulting, I

00:09:18 --> 00:09:20

teach this so those,

00:09:22 --> 00:09:25

owners of corporations and people working corporations and

00:09:25 --> 00:09:27

managers and leaders, you're getting this for free.

00:09:28 --> 00:09:29

They learn the lesson

00:09:29 --> 00:09:32

of how to correct their subordinates.

00:09:33 --> 00:09:34

Sit to the person,

00:09:35 --> 00:09:37

ask them, first of all, what happened?

00:09:37 --> 00:09:38

Actual facts,

00:09:39 --> 00:09:40

not opinions.

00:09:40 --> 00:09:42

Where there is, you might be working in

00:09:42 --> 00:09:44

a in a situation where there is some

00:09:44 --> 00:09:44

camera

00:09:45 --> 00:09:45

footage,

00:09:46 --> 00:09:49

see that. Just watch it. No praise, no

00:09:49 --> 00:09:51

blame. That's the key thing. No praise, no

00:09:51 --> 00:09:53

don't say you did wrong. No no, hold

00:09:53 --> 00:09:54

on. We we won't come to that. Right

00:09:54 --> 00:09:57

now, we're examining the data. This is the

00:09:57 --> 00:10:00

data. Once we have the data clear, is

00:10:00 --> 00:10:02

the data clear? Yes. It's clear. Now, therefore,

00:10:02 --> 00:10:05

what do we learn from this? No. Before

00:10:05 --> 00:10:07

that, what were the options? So you behaved

00:10:07 --> 00:10:10

in a certain way, what were the options?

00:10:10 --> 00:10:12

What else could you have done?

00:10:13 --> 00:10:15

Now remember, in that heat of the moment,

00:10:15 --> 00:10:16

the person did what they did, they weren't

00:10:16 --> 00:10:17

thinking straight,

00:10:18 --> 00:10:21

you know, their brains were clouded with emotions

00:10:21 --> 00:10:23

and so on. But now, you're having this

00:10:23 --> 00:10:26

conversation later, so they're also full headed. They

00:10:26 --> 00:10:27

will be able to see and once they

00:10:27 --> 00:10:29

realize that there's no praise, no blame, they're

00:10:29 --> 00:10:31

not gonna get punished for this. The only

00:10:31 --> 00:10:33

thing here is, can you see

00:10:34 --> 00:10:36

the lessons in this thing and can you

00:10:36 --> 00:10:38

extract those lessons? And as long as they

00:10:38 --> 00:10:40

will do that, there's no praise, no blame.

00:10:40 --> 00:10:42

So therefore, people will actually look at things

00:10:42 --> 00:10:45

objectively, which is our object, which is our

00:10:45 --> 00:10:47

goal. So therefore, now you say, well, now

00:10:47 --> 00:10:49

what were the options available to you at

00:10:49 --> 00:10:51

the time? You did

00:10:51 --> 00:10:53

this, but you could have also done number

00:10:53 --> 00:10:55

2, you could have done number 3.

00:10:55 --> 00:10:57

Maybe there were more than 3 options available

00:10:57 --> 00:10:59

to you. Which do you think was,

00:10:59 --> 00:11:02

or would have been the best option? Which

00:11:02 --> 00:11:04

would have been the better option than whatever

00:11:04 --> 00:11:05

you did?

00:11:05 --> 00:11:07

Then saying going forward now. Now we are

00:11:07 --> 00:11:11

plucking the holes. We're saying now going forward,

00:11:11 --> 00:11:13

what would you like to do in this

00:11:13 --> 00:11:15

kind of a situation? We are not saying

00:11:15 --> 00:11:16

the situation will never happen again because it

00:11:16 --> 00:11:18

will happen again. It will happen again and

00:11:18 --> 00:11:21

again and again. And obviously, the first time,

00:11:21 --> 00:11:22

the way you dealt with it was not

00:11:22 --> 00:11:23

good.

00:11:23 --> 00:11:25

Going forward, how would you like to deal

00:11:25 --> 00:11:27

with that? Now this is the way to

00:11:27 --> 00:11:28

go about,

00:11:29 --> 00:11:30

Turbiah,

00:11:30 --> 00:11:30

Wotaskia,

00:11:32 --> 00:11:35

of Akhlaq, of, whether it's children or adults,

00:11:35 --> 00:11:38

turn it into a learning opportunity.

00:11:38 --> 00:11:40

Turn it into a learning opportunity. Unfortunately,

00:11:41 --> 00:11:43

especially in our Madaris,

00:11:44 --> 00:11:45

in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh,

00:11:46 --> 00:11:48

And I know also in Egypt because

00:11:48 --> 00:11:51

there are people here in America who are

00:11:51 --> 00:11:52

from Egypt and who,

00:11:53 --> 00:11:54

have told me this in so many words,

00:11:55 --> 00:11:56

that, you know, this is what happened. And

00:11:56 --> 00:11:59

what happens is beating. It's common punishment, beat

00:11:59 --> 00:12:01

the living dead right out of the kid,

00:12:01 --> 00:12:02

put the fear of God into him. He's

00:12:02 --> 00:12:04

not put you're not putting the fear of

00:12:04 --> 00:12:05

God, you're putting your own fear and the

00:12:05 --> 00:12:07

kid will do he'll just wait for an

00:12:07 --> 00:12:10

opportunity to do it again when you can't

00:12:10 --> 00:12:11

catch him and you are not god. So

00:12:11 --> 00:12:13

you are there will be that opportunity.

00:12:13 --> 00:12:16

The kid learned nothing except that you are

00:12:16 --> 00:12:18

stronger than he is, and that's a pure

00:12:18 --> 00:12:18

animal,

00:12:19 --> 00:12:23

reaction and animal response. No use. So that's

00:12:23 --> 00:12:24

not what we're talking about. We're talking about

00:12:24 --> 00:12:26

turning every

00:12:27 --> 00:12:28

mistake,

00:12:28 --> 00:12:29

every

00:12:29 --> 00:12:32

even including, you know, something which is not

00:12:32 --> 00:12:34

just a mistake, maybe, within courts of crime,

00:12:35 --> 00:12:37

into a potential learning opportunity.

Share Page