Mirza Yawar Baig – The reality of rationality

Mirza Yawar Baig
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speakers discuss the importance of logic and rationality in evaluating religious beliefs. The Sharia law provides the law of non contradiction, meaning everything is one or the other and not something in the middle of those two things. belief is not a creator and the logic of the Sharia law is the most irrational and illogical statement. The speakers emphasize the importance of understanding laws and actions in order to achieve their goals.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:12 --> 00:00:15
			My brothers and sisters, we hear many times
		
00:00:18 --> 00:00:21
			that Islam is a reasonable logical and rational
		
00:00:21 --> 00:00:23
			religion and that Allah has
		
00:00:24 --> 00:00:26
			encouraged us to think and reflect
		
00:00:27 --> 00:00:29
			for example Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala said
		
00:00:32 --> 00:00:33
			don't you think don't you remember
		
00:00:36 --> 00:00:38
			Don't you reflect? Don't you make figure?
		
00:00:39 --> 00:00:41
			Don't you see and so on.
		
00:00:42 --> 00:00:45
			Allah addressed us by terms such as
		
00:00:47 --> 00:00:48
			or people of intelligence.
		
00:00:50 --> 00:00:53
			O people who can see and so on.
		
00:00:53 --> 00:00:54
			So the Quran
		
00:00:54 --> 00:00:56
			encourages rational thought.
		
00:00:57 --> 00:00:59
			Now all is well until this time. However,
		
00:01:00 --> 00:01:02
			some people take this to mean that we
		
00:01:02 --> 00:01:05
			are free to take any eye of the
		
00:01:05 --> 00:01:05
			Quran
		
00:01:06 --> 00:01:09
			and or any hadith of Rasool Salam
		
00:01:09 --> 00:01:11
			and come to our own come to our
		
00:01:11 --> 00:01:14
			own conclusions about it and legislate
		
00:01:15 --> 00:01:16
			according to those conclusions
		
00:01:17 --> 00:01:20
			without any reference to and indeed even denying,
		
00:01:20 --> 00:01:23
			denigrating, and discounting the 14th centuries of scholarship
		
00:01:24 --> 00:01:26
			that is behind the interpretation of the Quran
		
00:01:26 --> 00:01:28
			and the laws of our Sharia.
		
00:01:29 --> 00:01:30
			The pope the proponents
		
00:01:31 --> 00:01:33
			of this what is really irrational,
		
00:01:34 --> 00:01:37
			illogical, and dangerous philosophy are the ones that
		
00:01:37 --> 00:01:39
			I want to address here. Let us begin
		
00:01:39 --> 00:01:41
			with defining logic and rationality
		
00:01:42 --> 00:01:44
			because that is the foundation of the argument.
		
00:01:45 --> 00:01:48
			The basic statement we make when we study
		
00:01:48 --> 00:01:50
			logic or state talk about logic is
		
00:01:51 --> 00:01:53
			that if an argument is valid, then every
		
00:01:53 --> 00:01:56
			argument with the same form is also valid.
		
00:01:56 --> 00:01:57
			Similarly,
		
00:01:57 --> 00:01:59
			if an argument is invalid,
		
00:01:59 --> 00:02:02
			then every argument with the same form is
		
00:02:02 --> 00:02:03
			also invalid.
		
00:02:03 --> 00:02:05
			So the first thing to ask is what
		
00:02:05 --> 00:02:07
			is the basis of my logic?
		
00:02:08 --> 00:02:11
			What is the basis of my logic? That
		
00:02:11 --> 00:02:12
			is the first question
		
00:02:12 --> 00:02:14
			that we need to ask.
		
00:02:15 --> 00:02:18
			Those those who talk about logic and rationality,
		
00:02:18 --> 00:02:20
			that is the first question that they need
		
00:02:20 --> 00:02:21
			to ask.
		
00:02:22 --> 00:02:22
			Let me,
		
00:02:23 --> 00:02:25
			for those who may not know
		
00:02:25 --> 00:02:26
			or may not have studied logic,
		
00:02:27 --> 00:02:29
			logic is not just some thought that comes
		
00:02:29 --> 00:02:31
			into your mind. There is a discipline
		
00:02:31 --> 00:02:32
			called logic.
		
00:02:32 --> 00:02:33
			It used to
		
00:02:34 --> 00:02:36
			be once upon a time a whole subject
		
00:02:37 --> 00:02:38
			in our,
		
00:02:39 --> 00:02:41
			duros, in our syllabus,
		
00:02:42 --> 00:02:42
			in our.
		
00:02:46 --> 00:02:47
			There are 3 fundamental
		
00:02:47 --> 00:02:50
			laws of logic as defined by Aristotle.
		
00:02:50 --> 00:02:52
			The first one is called the law of
		
00:02:52 --> 00:02:53
			identity,
		
00:02:53 --> 00:02:56
			and that is if something is identified as
		
00:02:56 --> 00:02:58
			as one thing, then that is what it
		
00:02:58 --> 00:03:00
			is. If something is milk, it is milk.
		
00:03:00 --> 00:03:02
			It is not water. It is not wine.
		
00:03:02 --> 00:03:04
			It is not ink. It is milk.
		
00:03:04 --> 00:03:07
			The law of identity basically states
		
00:03:07 --> 00:03:09
			that anything that has been determined to be
		
00:03:09 --> 00:03:13
			true must be identical to itself and different
		
00:03:13 --> 00:03:14
			from other things.
		
00:03:15 --> 00:03:16
			As I I give you the example of
		
00:03:16 --> 00:03:17
			milk,
		
00:03:18 --> 00:03:20
			compared to other things. Similarly,
		
00:03:21 --> 00:03:22
			for example, if a snake is venomous,
		
00:03:23 --> 00:03:25
			then it is not non venomous.
		
00:03:25 --> 00:03:26
			So it is not
		
00:03:27 --> 00:03:28
			harmless. It is venomous.
		
00:03:30 --> 00:03:33
			And someone who knows the difference between the
		
00:03:33 --> 00:03:33
			two
		
00:03:35 --> 00:03:38
			but is afraid of all snakes is irrational
		
00:03:39 --> 00:03:41
			because you know the difference between a venomous
		
00:03:41 --> 00:03:43
			snake and a non venomous snake and obviously
		
00:03:43 --> 00:03:46
			he knows that a venomous snake is harmful
		
00:03:46 --> 00:03:48
			and a non venomous snake is not harmful
		
00:03:49 --> 00:03:51
			but he fears all snakes so you have
		
00:03:51 --> 00:03:53
			to say that this person is being irrational.
		
00:03:54 --> 00:03:56
			The second law is called the law of
		
00:03:56 --> 00:03:57
			non contradiction,
		
00:03:58 --> 00:03:59
			which says that if something is one thing,
		
00:03:59 --> 00:04:01
			it cannot be its opposite at the same
		
00:04:01 --> 00:04:03
			time. If something is black, it can't be
		
00:04:03 --> 00:04:05
			white at the same time and vice versa.
		
00:04:06 --> 00:04:08
			And that's the law of non contradiction.
		
00:04:08 --> 00:04:10
			Non con this is,
		
00:04:13 --> 00:04:14
			so the law of non contradiction,
		
00:04:15 --> 00:04:16
			for example,
		
00:04:16 --> 00:04:18
			it would state that
		
00:04:18 --> 00:04:19
			if something,
		
00:04:20 --> 00:04:21
			is true,
		
00:04:23 --> 00:04:24
			it cannot be
		
00:04:25 --> 00:04:27
			it cannot not be true. It cannot be
		
00:04:27 --> 00:04:28
			false at the same time. If something is
		
00:04:28 --> 00:04:29
			true,
		
00:04:31 --> 00:04:31
			it
		
00:04:32 --> 00:04:33
			cannot
		
00:04:34 --> 00:04:36
			not be true or cannot be false at
		
00:04:36 --> 00:04:37
			the same time.
		
00:04:37 --> 00:04:39
			One way to look at it is to
		
00:04:39 --> 00:04:40
			see 2 opposing
		
00:04:41 --> 00:04:42
			religious beliefs
		
00:04:44 --> 00:04:46
			and use the law of non contradiction
		
00:04:46 --> 00:04:48
			to evaluate them. One belief is that there
		
00:04:48 --> 00:04:49
			is a heaven
		
00:04:50 --> 00:04:52
			that people go to when they die. The
		
00:04:52 --> 00:04:54
			other belief is that there is no heaven
		
00:04:54 --> 00:04:57
			at all. Now each belief seems legitimate on
		
00:04:57 --> 00:04:59
			its own, but when compared to each other,
		
00:04:59 --> 00:05:01
			one of them must be false. So if
		
00:05:01 --> 00:05:02
			there is a heaven, then you cannot have
		
00:05:02 --> 00:05:05
			a situation where there's no heaven and vice
		
00:05:05 --> 00:05:07
			versa. So if heaven is real for 1
		
00:05:07 --> 00:05:09
			person, for example, then it must be real
		
00:05:09 --> 00:05:11
			for everyone. It's not a heaven that is
		
00:05:11 --> 00:05:13
			made only for 1 individual.
		
00:05:13 --> 00:05:15
			The third one is called the law of
		
00:05:15 --> 00:05:16
			the excluded
		
00:05:17 --> 00:05:17
			middle.
		
00:05:18 --> 00:05:19
			The law of the excluded middle,
		
00:05:21 --> 00:05:23
			which means that everything is 1 or the
		
00:05:23 --> 00:05:25
			other and not something in the middle of
		
00:05:25 --> 00:05:26
			those two things.
		
00:05:27 --> 00:05:29
			A way to think about this law is,
		
00:05:29 --> 00:05:30
			for example, regarding death.
		
00:05:31 --> 00:05:34
			Being is either alive or dead. There isn't
		
00:05:34 --> 00:05:37
			another state that a living being can be
		
00:05:37 --> 00:05:40
			in, which is neither living nor dead. An
		
00:05:40 --> 00:05:43
			unconscious person for example is still alive.
		
00:05:43 --> 00:05:45
			He's not dead. Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala challenged
		
00:05:45 --> 00:05:46
			the disbelievers
		
00:05:46 --> 00:05:48
			with respect to their belief in the creator
		
00:05:48 --> 00:05:51
			for example in this, to to to, emphasize
		
00:05:51 --> 00:05:53
			this. And he said,
		
00:06:32 --> 00:06:35
			he said ask them oh Prophet Muhammad
		
00:06:36 --> 00:06:36
			to whom
		
00:06:37 --> 00:06:40
			belong the earth and all those on it
		
00:06:40 --> 00:06:42
			If you really know, they will say to
		
00:06:42 --> 00:06:42
			Allah.
		
00:06:43 --> 00:06:45
			Say to them, why are you not then
		
00:06:45 --> 00:06:46
			mindful?
		
00:06:47 --> 00:06:49
			Ask them, who is the rub of the
		
00:06:49 --> 00:06:51
			7 heavens and the rub of the mighty
		
00:06:51 --> 00:06:52
			throne?
		
00:06:53 --> 00:06:54
			They will say Allah
		
00:06:54 --> 00:06:57
			say will you not then fear him? As
		
00:06:57 --> 00:07:00
			them also in whose hands is the authority
		
00:07:00 --> 00:07:04
			over all things protecting all while none can
		
00:07:04 --> 00:07:05
			protect him
		
00:07:07 --> 00:07:08
			If you really know
		
00:07:09 --> 00:07:11
			and they will say the same thing. They
		
00:07:11 --> 00:07:11
			will say,
		
00:07:22 --> 00:07:23
			They
		
00:07:24 --> 00:07:25
			will reply Allah,
		
00:07:25 --> 00:07:28
			say how are you then so deluded?
		
00:07:29 --> 00:07:31
			In another place, Surat Al Ankaboth, Allah subhanahu
		
00:07:31 --> 00:07:32
			wa ta'ala
		
00:07:32 --> 00:07:33
			said,
		
00:07:41 --> 00:07:43
			If you ask them, O Prophet Sallallahu Alaihi
		
00:07:43 --> 00:07:44
			Wasallam,
		
00:07:45 --> 00:07:47
			who created the heavens and the earth and
		
00:07:47 --> 00:07:49
			subjected the sun and the moon for your
		
00:07:49 --> 00:07:51
			benefit, they will certainly say Allah.
		
00:07:52 --> 00:07:54
			How can they then be deluded from the
		
00:07:54 --> 00:07:54
			truth?
		
00:07:55 --> 00:07:57
			The question to
		
00:07:57 --> 00:08:00
			ask those who claim to believe in Allah
		
00:08:00 --> 00:08:01
			Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala as the creator.
		
00:08:02 --> 00:08:03
			We are looking
		
00:08:03 --> 00:08:05
			at all of this from a rational perspective
		
00:08:06 --> 00:08:08
			so the question to ask those who claim
		
00:08:08 --> 00:08:10
			to believe in Allah as the creator is
		
00:08:10 --> 00:08:11
			why do you believe this
		
00:08:12 --> 00:08:14
			when Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala is saying all
		
00:08:14 --> 00:08:14
			of these things
		
00:08:15 --> 00:08:17
			why do you believe this because think about
		
00:08:17 --> 00:08:19
			this because the atheists
		
00:08:19 --> 00:08:21
			have an answer to all the above
		
00:08:21 --> 00:08:24
			all these questions which is that it is
		
00:08:24 --> 00:08:25
			all accident
		
00:08:25 --> 00:08:27
			and does not point to a creator.
		
00:08:28 --> 00:08:30
			If you say that you believe that there
		
00:08:30 --> 00:08:30
			is a creator,
		
00:08:31 --> 00:08:33
			it means that by the fundamental
		
00:08:33 --> 00:08:34
			laws of logic,
		
00:08:34 --> 00:08:37
			you can't at the same time believe that
		
00:08:37 --> 00:08:39
			there is no creator. So what is your
		
00:08:39 --> 00:08:41
			belief? Is there a creator or not?
		
00:08:42 --> 00:08:44
			And if there is a creator, is it
		
00:08:44 --> 00:08:44
			Allah?
		
00:08:45 --> 00:08:47
			If you say yes to both these questions,
		
00:08:48 --> 00:08:50
			then the next question is why do you
		
00:08:50 --> 00:08:51
			believe this?
		
00:08:52 --> 00:08:53
			What is your logic
		
00:08:54 --> 00:08:54
			or rationale?
		
00:08:55 --> 00:08:57
			Now if you say no, then obviously you
		
00:08:57 --> 00:08:58
			are not a Muslim because if you say
		
00:08:58 --> 00:09:01
			that the creator that there is no creator
		
00:09:01 --> 00:09:03
			or the creator is not Allah, then you
		
00:09:03 --> 00:09:05
			are not a Muslim and we have no
		
00:09:05 --> 00:09:05
			further,
		
00:09:06 --> 00:09:08
			nothing more to say. But if you say
		
00:09:08 --> 00:09:10
			yes, there is a creator and yes, that
		
00:09:10 --> 00:09:13
			creator is not some way creator creator but
		
00:09:13 --> 00:09:14
			it's Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala
		
00:09:15 --> 00:09:17
			which is you're saying yes to both these
		
00:09:17 --> 00:09:19
			questions. Next question then for it therefore is
		
00:09:19 --> 00:09:21
			why do you say that? Why do you
		
00:09:21 --> 00:09:23
			believe this? What is your logic?
		
00:09:24 --> 00:09:26
			Because we are talking about logic. What is
		
00:09:26 --> 00:09:28
			your logic? What is your rationale?
		
00:09:29 --> 00:09:31
			The only possible answer to that can can
		
00:09:31 --> 00:09:31
			be
		
00:09:32 --> 00:09:36
			because Rasool Allah Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam told us
		
00:09:36 --> 00:09:37
			so
		
00:09:37 --> 00:09:39
			because Rasool Allah Sallallahu
		
00:09:41 --> 00:09:43
			said so. The question is why do you
		
00:09:43 --> 00:09:45
			believe what he told you?
		
00:09:46 --> 00:09:47
			Answer because
		
00:09:47 --> 00:09:49
			we believe in him
		
00:09:49 --> 00:09:51
			that he was the messenger of Allah
		
00:09:52 --> 00:09:53
			and we believe him
		
00:09:54 --> 00:09:56
			that he never lied and always spoke the
		
00:09:56 --> 00:09:58
			truth. I want to define these two things
		
00:09:59 --> 00:10:02
			believing in him is the meaning
		
00:10:03 --> 00:10:06
			of Ashadwanda Muhammad Rasulullah that we believe he
		
00:10:06 --> 00:10:07
			was the Rasulullah.
		
00:10:07 --> 00:10:10
			Believing him is to believe that he was
		
00:10:10 --> 00:10:10
			truthful.
		
00:10:11 --> 00:10:13
			Even the Quraish who did not believe in
		
00:10:13 --> 00:10:14
			him,
		
00:10:14 --> 00:10:16
			who did not accept him as the messenger
		
00:10:16 --> 00:10:18
			of Allah, they believe that he was truthful.
		
00:10:19 --> 00:10:20
			They gave him the title
		
00:10:21 --> 00:10:23
			before they came to Islam. Many of them
		
00:10:23 --> 00:10:25
			never came to Islam, but they did not
		
00:10:25 --> 00:10:27
			say that Mohammed sallallahu alaihi was a liar.
		
00:10:28 --> 00:10:30
			But, they said he was deluded. They said
		
00:10:30 --> 00:10:32
			he was, you know, but you know,
		
00:10:33 --> 00:10:34
			and so on. They said he had he
		
00:10:34 --> 00:10:37
			was, affected by a jinn, but they did
		
00:10:37 --> 00:10:39
			not say he is a liar. Nobody ever
		
00:10:39 --> 00:10:41
			accused of a lie. So they believe that
		
00:10:41 --> 00:10:43
			he he spoke the truth. Here, the issue
		
00:10:43 --> 00:10:44
			is not that here the issue is for
		
00:10:44 --> 00:10:46
			a Muslim. We have to believe in him
		
00:10:47 --> 00:10:48
			as the messenger of Allah
		
00:10:49 --> 00:10:51
			salallahu alayhi salam and we believe that he
		
00:10:51 --> 00:10:53
			never lied. So the question is because
		
00:10:54 --> 00:10:56
			I believe Allah is the creator
		
00:10:56 --> 00:10:57
			because Mohammed
		
00:10:58 --> 00:11:00
			said so, and I believe what Mohammed said
		
00:11:01 --> 00:11:03
			because I believe in him, and I believe
		
00:11:03 --> 00:11:06
			that he spoke the truth.
		
00:11:07 --> 00:11:09
			Question is if that is your logic that
		
00:11:09 --> 00:11:13
			we believe what Rasool Rasool told us with
		
00:11:13 --> 00:11:14
			respect to Allah,
		
00:11:14 --> 00:11:15
			then that applies
		
00:11:16 --> 00:11:16
			to
		
00:11:17 --> 00:11:18
			the entire Quran.
		
00:11:19 --> 00:11:21
			Right? It cannot apply only to the issue
		
00:11:21 --> 00:11:22
			of creation.
		
00:11:22 --> 00:11:24
			Not only to creation, but to the entire
		
00:11:24 --> 00:11:27
			Quran. If you agree, then what is the
		
00:11:27 --> 00:11:30
			logic about saying? We believe in what Rasoolah
		
00:11:30 --> 00:11:32
			told us about the Quran,
		
00:11:33 --> 00:11:34
			but when it comes to the laws of
		
00:11:34 --> 00:11:35
			the Sharia,
		
00:11:35 --> 00:11:37
			which we all which he also told us
		
00:11:37 --> 00:11:40
			about and commanded us to follow, we will
		
00:11:40 --> 00:11:41
			do whatever
		
00:11:41 --> 00:11:45
			within quotes makes sense to us, which is
		
00:11:45 --> 00:11:46
			appeals to our
		
00:11:46 --> 00:11:47
			rationality
		
00:11:47 --> 00:11:48
			and logic.
		
00:11:49 --> 00:11:51
			Now that would be
		
00:11:51 --> 00:11:53
			the most irrational
		
00:11:54 --> 00:11:54
			and illogical
		
00:11:54 --> 00:11:57
			statement that you can make. And that's why
		
00:11:57 --> 00:11:59
			I began with the fundamentals of logic. If
		
00:11:59 --> 00:12:02
			you don't get this point, go back and
		
00:12:02 --> 00:12:04
			listen to this thing from the beginning.
		
00:12:05 --> 00:12:08
			I repeat here that if you agree,
		
00:12:08 --> 00:12:10
			then what is the logic about saying we
		
00:12:10 --> 00:12:13
			believe in what Rasool Allah told us about
		
00:12:13 --> 00:12:13
			the creation.
		
00:12:13 --> 00:12:15
			But when it comes to other things in
		
00:12:15 --> 00:12:18
			the Quran, the laws of the Sharia, which
		
00:12:18 --> 00:12:20
			he also told us about and commanded us
		
00:12:20 --> 00:12:23
			to follow the same person. We will do
		
00:12:23 --> 00:12:25
			whatever makes sense to us. We will not
		
00:12:25 --> 00:12:26
			obey him. We will not do what he
		
00:12:26 --> 00:12:27
			tells us.
		
00:12:28 --> 00:12:30
			Whatever makes sense, meaning, whatever appeals to what
		
00:12:30 --> 00:12:32
			we call logic, our logic,
		
00:12:33 --> 00:12:36
			that would be and is the most irrational
		
00:12:36 --> 00:12:37
			and illogical statement
		
00:12:45 --> 00:12:46
			Allah
		
00:12:47 --> 00:12:47
			Subhanahu
		
00:12:52 --> 00:12:53
			wa'ala said
		
00:12:55 --> 00:12:56
			Have you seen all Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Waqila.
		
00:12:56 --> 00:12:56
			Have you seen all Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Waqila.
		
00:12:56 --> 00:12:57
			Have you seen all Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Waqila.
		
00:12:57 --> 00:12:59
			The one who has who has taken
		
00:13:00 --> 00:13:01
			his own desires
		
00:13:03 --> 00:13:05
			as their god. Have you seen
		
00:13:05 --> 00:13:06
			those
		
00:13:06 --> 00:13:07
			who have taken
		
00:13:08 --> 00:13:10
			their own desire
		
00:13:10 --> 00:13:11
			as,
		
00:13:13 --> 00:13:14
			their God,
		
00:13:14 --> 00:13:16
			will you then be a keeper or advocate
		
00:13:17 --> 00:13:19
			over them? Allah is telling them, mister Salam,
		
00:13:19 --> 00:13:21
			do not make intercession for them.
		
00:13:21 --> 00:13:22
			Who? For those
		
00:13:23 --> 00:13:26
			who give their desires, precedence over the orders
		
00:13:26 --> 00:13:28
			of Allah. Please note that according to the
		
00:13:28 --> 00:13:31
			fundamental laws of logic, you can neither believe
		
00:13:31 --> 00:13:32
			that the Quran you can do around 2
		
00:13:32 --> 00:13:35
			things. You can either believe that the Quran
		
00:13:35 --> 00:13:36
			is divine revelation
		
00:13:36 --> 00:13:39
			and that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah
		
00:13:39 --> 00:13:40
			and is divinely
		
00:13:41 --> 00:13:41
			inspired
		
00:13:42 --> 00:13:43
			and receives
		
00:13:44 --> 00:13:45
			and received revelation.
		
00:13:46 --> 00:13:48
			And so we believe everything he told us
		
00:13:48 --> 00:13:52
			not because we necessarily understand it all, but
		
00:13:52 --> 00:13:54
			because we believe in him and trust him
		
00:13:54 --> 00:13:57
			and believe him. Three things, believe in him,
		
00:13:57 --> 00:13:58
			trust him, and believe him.
		
00:13:59 --> 00:14:01
			Or the opposite that is we will only
		
00:14:01 --> 00:14:04
			believe what makes sense to our reason, which
		
00:14:04 --> 00:14:07
			is subject to the individual's knowledge base. Obviously,
		
00:14:07 --> 00:14:09
			the reason of a 5 year old cannot
		
00:14:09 --> 00:14:12
			be the reason of a 30 year old
		
00:14:12 --> 00:14:13
			with a PhD.
		
00:14:13 --> 00:14:16
			Then we must ask why they believe such
		
00:14:16 --> 00:14:16
			people
		
00:14:17 --> 00:14:19
			who say I only believe what is
		
00:14:20 --> 00:14:21
			what appeals to my reason,
		
00:14:22 --> 00:14:24
			ask them why do they believe
		
00:14:24 --> 00:14:25
			in MRIs
		
00:14:25 --> 00:14:26
			and medical,
		
00:14:27 --> 00:14:28
			diagnostic technology,
		
00:14:29 --> 00:14:30
			mobile phone technology,
		
00:14:31 --> 00:14:32
			curvature of space,
		
00:14:32 --> 00:14:33
			quarks,
		
00:14:33 --> 00:14:34
			subatomic
		
00:14:34 --> 00:14:35
			particles,
		
00:14:35 --> 00:14:38
			genetic code, and a million other things which
		
00:14:38 --> 00:14:41
			we take for granted as being true, though
		
00:14:41 --> 00:14:44
			we have no clue and cannot even describe
		
00:14:44 --> 00:14:47
			them. Nobody can even define them. Yet we
		
00:14:47 --> 00:14:48
			believe them to be true. Why do we
		
00:14:48 --> 00:14:51
			believe that? The answer can only be because
		
00:14:51 --> 00:14:54
			we know that someone somewhere, though we don't
		
00:14:54 --> 00:14:56
			even know who that person is, knows about
		
00:14:56 --> 00:14:59
			them. We believe them because we believe that
		
00:14:59 --> 00:15:02
			someone who knows them spoke the truth. In
		
00:15:02 --> 00:15:04
			that case, the last question,
		
00:15:04 --> 00:15:06
			what is your real belief
		
00:15:06 --> 00:15:08
			about Rasool Allah
		
00:15:08 --> 00:15:11
			he Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam? What is your real
		
00:15:11 --> 00:15:13
			belief about Rasool Allah Sallallahu
		
00:15:13 --> 00:15:15
			Think very carefully because we will be asked
		
00:15:15 --> 00:15:18
			this question in our graves. I remind myself
		
00:15:18 --> 00:15:19
			my brothers and sisters
		
00:15:19 --> 00:15:21
			about what Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala said about
		
00:15:21 --> 00:15:24
			those who pick and choose what they want
		
00:15:24 --> 00:15:26
			to believe and obey,
		
00:15:29 --> 00:15:32
			Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala said about them,
		
00:15:51 --> 00:15:53
			Allah said, do you believe in some of
		
00:15:53 --> 00:15:56
			the scripture and reject the rest? Is there
		
00:15:56 --> 00:15:58
			any reward for those who do so among
		
00:15:58 --> 00:16:01
			you other than disgrace in this worldly life
		
00:16:01 --> 00:16:04
			and being subjected to the harshest punishment on
		
00:16:04 --> 00:16:07
			the day of judgment? For Allah subhanahu wa
		
00:16:07 --> 00:16:08
			ta'ala is never unaware
		
00:16:09 --> 00:16:10
			of what you do.
		
00:16:10 --> 00:16:12
			I remind myself when you selective obedience
		
00:16:13 --> 00:16:14
			is disobedience.
		
00:16:14 --> 00:16:17
			Selective obedience is arrogance. That is why Allah
		
00:16:17 --> 00:16:20
			Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala warned us of such severe
		
00:16:20 --> 00:16:21
			punishment
		
00:16:21 --> 00:16:24
			in this life and the next. For the
		
00:16:24 --> 00:16:24
			believer,
		
00:16:25 --> 00:16:27
			there is only one option
		
00:16:27 --> 00:16:29
			after having believed.
		
00:16:29 --> 00:16:30
			Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala said,
		
00:16:44 --> 00:16:46
			The only response of the true believers
		
00:16:47 --> 00:16:48
			when they are called to Allah Subhanahu Wa
		
00:16:48 --> 00:16:49
			Ta'ala and his messenger
		
00:16:50 --> 00:16:52
			so that he may judge between them is
		
00:16:52 --> 00:16:55
			to say we hear and we obey. It
		
00:16:55 --> 00:16:56
			is they
		
00:16:56 --> 00:16:57
			who will truly succeed.
		
00:16:58 --> 00:17:00
			I remind myself when you let us be
		
00:17:00 --> 00:17:02
			logical. Let us be reasonable.
		
00:17:02 --> 00:17:04
			Let us be rational.
		
00:17:04 --> 00:17:06
			Let us be very clear
		
00:17:06 --> 00:17:09
			about all of these things and be sure
		
00:17:09 --> 00:17:10
			that we are,
		
00:17:11 --> 00:17:11
			rational
		
00:17:12 --> 00:17:13
			in a way
		
00:17:13 --> 00:17:14
			which is
		
00:17:14 --> 00:17:15
			correct
		
00:17:15 --> 00:17:17
			that we are rational
		
00:17:17 --> 00:17:19
			in a rational way
		
00:17:19 --> 00:17:20
			and not,
		
00:17:21 --> 00:17:22
			you become irrational
		
00:17:23 --> 00:17:25
			when it comes to using rationality
		
00:17:26 --> 00:17:28
			to understand the kitab of Allah and the
		
00:17:28 --> 00:17:30
			sunnah of Rasoolallahu
		
00:17:32 --> 00:17:32
			Sallallahu