Mirza Yawar Baig – The reality of rationality

Mirza Yawar Baig
AI: Summary ©
The speakers discuss the importance of logic and rationality in evaluating religious beliefs. The Sharia law provides the law of non contradiction, meaning everything is one or the other and not something in the middle of those two things. belief is not a creator and the logic of the Sharia law is the most irrational and illogical statement. The speakers emphasize the importance of understanding laws and actions in order to achieve their goals.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:12 --> 00:00:15

My brothers and sisters, we hear many times

00:00:18 --> 00:00:21

that Islam is a reasonable logical and rational

00:00:21 --> 00:00:23

religion and that Allah has

00:00:24 --> 00:00:26

encouraged us to think and reflect

00:00:27 --> 00:00:29

for example Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala said

00:00:32 --> 00:00:33

don't you think don't you remember

00:00:36 --> 00:00:38

Don't you reflect? Don't you make figure?

00:00:39 --> 00:00:41

Don't you see and so on.

00:00:42 --> 00:00:45

Allah addressed us by terms such as

00:00:47 --> 00:00:48

or people of intelligence.

00:00:50 --> 00:00:53

O people who can see and so on.

00:00:53 --> 00:00:54

So the Quran

00:00:54 --> 00:00:56

encourages rational thought.

00:00:57 --> 00:00:59

Now all is well until this time. However,

00:01:00 --> 00:01:02

some people take this to mean that we

00:01:02 --> 00:01:05

are free to take any eye of the

00:01:05 --> 00:01:05

Quran

00:01:06 --> 00:01:09

and or any hadith of Rasool Salam

00:01:09 --> 00:01:11

and come to our own come to our

00:01:11 --> 00:01:14

own conclusions about it and legislate

00:01:15 --> 00:01:16

according to those conclusions

00:01:17 --> 00:01:20

without any reference to and indeed even denying,

00:01:20 --> 00:01:23

denigrating, and discounting the 14th centuries of scholarship

00:01:24 --> 00:01:26

that is behind the interpretation of the Quran

00:01:26 --> 00:01:28

and the laws of our Sharia.

00:01:29 --> 00:01:30

The pope the proponents

00:01:31 --> 00:01:33

of this what is really irrational,

00:01:34 --> 00:01:37

illogical, and dangerous philosophy are the ones that

00:01:37 --> 00:01:39

I want to address here. Let us begin

00:01:39 --> 00:01:41

with defining logic and rationality

00:01:42 --> 00:01:44

because that is the foundation of the argument.

00:01:45 --> 00:01:48

The basic statement we make when we study

00:01:48 --> 00:01:50

logic or state talk about logic is

00:01:51 --> 00:01:53

that if an argument is valid, then every

00:01:53 --> 00:01:56

argument with the same form is also valid.

00:01:56 --> 00:01:57

Similarly,

00:01:57 --> 00:01:59

if an argument is invalid,

00:01:59 --> 00:02:02

then every argument with the same form is

00:02:02 --> 00:02:03

also invalid.

00:02:03 --> 00:02:05

So the first thing to ask is what

00:02:05 --> 00:02:07

is the basis of my logic?

00:02:08 --> 00:02:11

What is the basis of my logic? That

00:02:11 --> 00:02:12

is the first question

00:02:12 --> 00:02:14

that we need to ask.

00:02:15 --> 00:02:18

Those those who talk about logic and rationality,

00:02:18 --> 00:02:20

that is the first question that they need

00:02:20 --> 00:02:21

to ask.

00:02:22 --> 00:02:22

Let me,

00:02:23 --> 00:02:25

for those who may not know

00:02:25 --> 00:02:26

or may not have studied logic,

00:02:27 --> 00:02:29

logic is not just some thought that comes

00:02:29 --> 00:02:31

into your mind. There is a discipline

00:02:31 --> 00:02:32

called logic.

00:02:32 --> 00:02:33

It used to

00:02:34 --> 00:02:36

be once upon a time a whole subject

00:02:37 --> 00:02:38

in our,

00:02:39 --> 00:02:41

duros, in our syllabus,

00:02:42 --> 00:02:42

in our.

00:02:46 --> 00:02:47

There are 3 fundamental

00:02:47 --> 00:02:50

laws of logic as defined by Aristotle.

00:02:50 --> 00:02:52

The first one is called the law of

00:02:52 --> 00:02:53

identity,

00:02:53 --> 00:02:56

and that is if something is identified as

00:02:56 --> 00:02:58

as one thing, then that is what it

00:02:58 --> 00:03:00

is. If something is milk, it is milk.

00:03:00 --> 00:03:02

It is not water. It is not wine.

00:03:02 --> 00:03:04

It is not ink. It is milk.

00:03:04 --> 00:03:07

The law of identity basically states

00:03:07 --> 00:03:09

that anything that has been determined to be

00:03:09 --> 00:03:13

true must be identical to itself and different

00:03:13 --> 00:03:14

from other things.

00:03:15 --> 00:03:16

As I I give you the example of

00:03:16 --> 00:03:17

milk,

00:03:18 --> 00:03:20

compared to other things. Similarly,

00:03:21 --> 00:03:22

for example, if a snake is venomous,

00:03:23 --> 00:03:25

then it is not non venomous.

00:03:25 --> 00:03:26

So it is not

00:03:27 --> 00:03:28

harmless. It is venomous.

00:03:30 --> 00:03:33

And someone who knows the difference between the

00:03:33 --> 00:03:33

two

00:03:35 --> 00:03:38

but is afraid of all snakes is irrational

00:03:39 --> 00:03:41

because you know the difference between a venomous

00:03:41 --> 00:03:43

snake and a non venomous snake and obviously

00:03:43 --> 00:03:46

he knows that a venomous snake is harmful

00:03:46 --> 00:03:48

and a non venomous snake is not harmful

00:03:49 --> 00:03:51

but he fears all snakes so you have

00:03:51 --> 00:03:53

to say that this person is being irrational.

00:03:54 --> 00:03:56

The second law is called the law of

00:03:56 --> 00:03:57

non contradiction,

00:03:58 --> 00:03:59

which says that if something is one thing,

00:03:59 --> 00:04:01

it cannot be its opposite at the same

00:04:01 --> 00:04:03

time. If something is black, it can't be

00:04:03 --> 00:04:05

white at the same time and vice versa.

00:04:06 --> 00:04:08

And that's the law of non contradiction.

00:04:08 --> 00:04:10

Non con this is,

00:04:13 --> 00:04:14

so the law of non contradiction,

00:04:15 --> 00:04:16

for example,

00:04:16 --> 00:04:18

it would state that

00:04:18 --> 00:04:19

if something,

00:04:20 --> 00:04:21

is true,

00:04:23 --> 00:04:24

it cannot be

00:04:25 --> 00:04:27

it cannot not be true. It cannot be

00:04:27 --> 00:04:28

false at the same time. If something is

00:04:28 --> 00:04:29

true,

00:04:31 --> 00:04:31

it

00:04:32 --> 00:04:33

cannot

00:04:34 --> 00:04:36

not be true or cannot be false at

00:04:36 --> 00:04:37

the same time.

00:04:37 --> 00:04:39

One way to look at it is to

00:04:39 --> 00:04:40

see 2 opposing

00:04:41 --> 00:04:42

religious beliefs

00:04:44 --> 00:04:46

and use the law of non contradiction

00:04:46 --> 00:04:48

to evaluate them. One belief is that there

00:04:48 --> 00:04:49

is a heaven

00:04:50 --> 00:04:52

that people go to when they die. The

00:04:52 --> 00:04:54

other belief is that there is no heaven

00:04:54 --> 00:04:57

at all. Now each belief seems legitimate on

00:04:57 --> 00:04:59

its own, but when compared to each other,

00:04:59 --> 00:05:01

one of them must be false. So if

00:05:01 --> 00:05:02

there is a heaven, then you cannot have

00:05:02 --> 00:05:05

a situation where there's no heaven and vice

00:05:05 --> 00:05:07

versa. So if heaven is real for 1

00:05:07 --> 00:05:09

person, for example, then it must be real

00:05:09 --> 00:05:11

for everyone. It's not a heaven that is

00:05:11 --> 00:05:13

made only for 1 individual.

00:05:13 --> 00:05:15

The third one is called the law of

00:05:15 --> 00:05:16

the excluded

00:05:17 --> 00:05:17

middle.

00:05:18 --> 00:05:19

The law of the excluded middle,

00:05:21 --> 00:05:23

which means that everything is 1 or the

00:05:23 --> 00:05:25

other and not something in the middle of

00:05:25 --> 00:05:26

those two things.

00:05:27 --> 00:05:29

A way to think about this law is,

00:05:29 --> 00:05:30

for example, regarding death.

00:05:31 --> 00:05:34

Being is either alive or dead. There isn't

00:05:34 --> 00:05:37

another state that a living being can be

00:05:37 --> 00:05:40

in, which is neither living nor dead. An

00:05:40 --> 00:05:43

unconscious person for example is still alive.

00:05:43 --> 00:05:45

He's not dead. Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala challenged

00:05:45 --> 00:05:46

the disbelievers

00:05:46 --> 00:05:48

with respect to their belief in the creator

00:05:48 --> 00:05:51

for example in this, to to to, emphasize

00:05:51 --> 00:05:53

this. And he said,

00:06:32 --> 00:06:35

he said ask them oh Prophet Muhammad

00:06:36 --> 00:06:36

to whom

00:06:37 --> 00:06:40

belong the earth and all those on it

00:06:40 --> 00:06:42

If you really know, they will say to

00:06:42 --> 00:06:42

Allah.

00:06:43 --> 00:06:45

Say to them, why are you not then

00:06:45 --> 00:06:46

mindful?

00:06:47 --> 00:06:49

Ask them, who is the rub of the

00:06:49 --> 00:06:51

7 heavens and the rub of the mighty

00:06:51 --> 00:06:52

throne?

00:06:53 --> 00:06:54

They will say Allah

00:06:54 --> 00:06:57

say will you not then fear him? As

00:06:57 --> 00:07:00

them also in whose hands is the authority

00:07:00 --> 00:07:04

over all things protecting all while none can

00:07:04 --> 00:07:05

protect him

00:07:07 --> 00:07:08

If you really know

00:07:09 --> 00:07:11

and they will say the same thing. They

00:07:11 --> 00:07:11

will say,

00:07:22 --> 00:07:23

They

00:07:24 --> 00:07:25

will reply Allah,

00:07:25 --> 00:07:28

say how are you then so deluded?

00:07:29 --> 00:07:31

In another place, Surat Al Ankaboth, Allah subhanahu

00:07:31 --> 00:07:32

wa ta'ala

00:07:32 --> 00:07:33

said,

00:07:41 --> 00:07:43

If you ask them, O Prophet Sallallahu Alaihi

00:07:43 --> 00:07:44

Wasallam,

00:07:45 --> 00:07:47

who created the heavens and the earth and

00:07:47 --> 00:07:49

subjected the sun and the moon for your

00:07:49 --> 00:07:51

benefit, they will certainly say Allah.

00:07:52 --> 00:07:54

How can they then be deluded from the

00:07:54 --> 00:07:54

truth?

00:07:55 --> 00:07:57

The question to

00:07:57 --> 00:08:00

ask those who claim to believe in Allah

00:08:00 --> 00:08:01

Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala as the creator.

00:08:02 --> 00:08:03

We are looking

00:08:03 --> 00:08:05

at all of this from a rational perspective

00:08:06 --> 00:08:08

so the question to ask those who claim

00:08:08 --> 00:08:10

to believe in Allah as the creator is

00:08:10 --> 00:08:11

why do you believe this

00:08:12 --> 00:08:14

when Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala is saying all

00:08:14 --> 00:08:14

of these things

00:08:15 --> 00:08:17

why do you believe this because think about

00:08:17 --> 00:08:19

this because the atheists

00:08:19 --> 00:08:21

have an answer to all the above

00:08:21 --> 00:08:24

all these questions which is that it is

00:08:24 --> 00:08:25

all accident

00:08:25 --> 00:08:27

and does not point to a creator.

00:08:28 --> 00:08:30

If you say that you believe that there

00:08:30 --> 00:08:30

is a creator,

00:08:31 --> 00:08:33

it means that by the fundamental

00:08:33 --> 00:08:34

laws of logic,

00:08:34 --> 00:08:37

you can't at the same time believe that

00:08:37 --> 00:08:39

there is no creator. So what is your

00:08:39 --> 00:08:41

belief? Is there a creator or not?

00:08:42 --> 00:08:44

And if there is a creator, is it

00:08:44 --> 00:08:44

Allah?

00:08:45 --> 00:08:47

If you say yes to both these questions,

00:08:48 --> 00:08:50

then the next question is why do you

00:08:50 --> 00:08:51

believe this?

00:08:52 --> 00:08:53

What is your logic

00:08:54 --> 00:08:54

or rationale?

00:08:55 --> 00:08:57

Now if you say no, then obviously you

00:08:57 --> 00:08:58

are not a Muslim because if you say

00:08:58 --> 00:09:01

that the creator that there is no creator

00:09:01 --> 00:09:03

or the creator is not Allah, then you

00:09:03 --> 00:09:05

are not a Muslim and we have no

00:09:05 --> 00:09:05

further,

00:09:06 --> 00:09:08

nothing more to say. But if you say

00:09:08 --> 00:09:10

yes, there is a creator and yes, that

00:09:10 --> 00:09:13

creator is not some way creator creator but

00:09:13 --> 00:09:14

it's Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala

00:09:15 --> 00:09:17

which is you're saying yes to both these

00:09:17 --> 00:09:19

questions. Next question then for it therefore is

00:09:19 --> 00:09:21

why do you say that? Why do you

00:09:21 --> 00:09:23

believe this? What is your logic?

00:09:24 --> 00:09:26

Because we are talking about logic. What is

00:09:26 --> 00:09:28

your logic? What is your rationale?

00:09:29 --> 00:09:31

The only possible answer to that can can

00:09:31 --> 00:09:31

be

00:09:32 --> 00:09:36

because Rasool Allah Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam told us

00:09:36 --> 00:09:37

so

00:09:37 --> 00:09:39

because Rasool Allah Sallallahu

00:09:41 --> 00:09:43

said so. The question is why do you

00:09:43 --> 00:09:45

believe what he told you?

00:09:46 --> 00:09:47

Answer because

00:09:47 --> 00:09:49

we believe in him

00:09:49 --> 00:09:51

that he was the messenger of Allah

00:09:52 --> 00:09:53

and we believe him

00:09:54 --> 00:09:56

that he never lied and always spoke the

00:09:56 --> 00:09:58

truth. I want to define these two things

00:09:59 --> 00:10:02

believing in him is the meaning

00:10:03 --> 00:10:06

of Ashadwanda Muhammad Rasulullah that we believe he

00:10:06 --> 00:10:07

was the Rasulullah.

00:10:07 --> 00:10:10

Believing him is to believe that he was

00:10:10 --> 00:10:10

truthful.

00:10:11 --> 00:10:13

Even the Quraish who did not believe in

00:10:13 --> 00:10:14

him,

00:10:14 --> 00:10:16

who did not accept him as the messenger

00:10:16 --> 00:10:18

of Allah, they believe that he was truthful.

00:10:19 --> 00:10:20

They gave him the title

00:10:21 --> 00:10:23

before they came to Islam. Many of them

00:10:23 --> 00:10:25

never came to Islam, but they did not

00:10:25 --> 00:10:27

say that Mohammed sallallahu alaihi was a liar.

00:10:28 --> 00:10:30

But, they said he was deluded. They said

00:10:30 --> 00:10:32

he was, you know, but you know,

00:10:33 --> 00:10:34

and so on. They said he had he

00:10:34 --> 00:10:37

was, affected by a jinn, but they did

00:10:37 --> 00:10:39

not say he is a liar. Nobody ever

00:10:39 --> 00:10:41

accused of a lie. So they believe that

00:10:41 --> 00:10:43

he he spoke the truth. Here, the issue

00:10:43 --> 00:10:44

is not that here the issue is for

00:10:44 --> 00:10:46

a Muslim. We have to believe in him

00:10:47 --> 00:10:48

as the messenger of Allah

00:10:49 --> 00:10:51

salallahu alayhi salam and we believe that he

00:10:51 --> 00:10:53

never lied. So the question is because

00:10:54 --> 00:10:56

I believe Allah is the creator

00:10:56 --> 00:10:57

because Mohammed

00:10:58 --> 00:11:00

said so, and I believe what Mohammed said

00:11:01 --> 00:11:03

because I believe in him, and I believe

00:11:03 --> 00:11:06

that he spoke the truth.

00:11:07 --> 00:11:09

Question is if that is your logic that

00:11:09 --> 00:11:13

we believe what Rasool Rasool told us with

00:11:13 --> 00:11:14

respect to Allah,

00:11:14 --> 00:11:15

then that applies

00:11:16 --> 00:11:16

to

00:11:17 --> 00:11:18

the entire Quran.

00:11:19 --> 00:11:21

Right? It cannot apply only to the issue

00:11:21 --> 00:11:22

of creation.

00:11:22 --> 00:11:24

Not only to creation, but to the entire

00:11:24 --> 00:11:27

Quran. If you agree, then what is the

00:11:27 --> 00:11:30

logic about saying? We believe in what Rasoolah

00:11:30 --> 00:11:32

told us about the Quran,

00:11:33 --> 00:11:34

but when it comes to the laws of

00:11:34 --> 00:11:35

the Sharia,

00:11:35 --> 00:11:37

which we all which he also told us

00:11:37 --> 00:11:40

about and commanded us to follow, we will

00:11:40 --> 00:11:41

do whatever

00:11:41 --> 00:11:45

within quotes makes sense to us, which is

00:11:45 --> 00:11:46

appeals to our

00:11:46 --> 00:11:47

rationality

00:11:47 --> 00:11:48

and logic.

00:11:49 --> 00:11:51

Now that would be

00:11:51 --> 00:11:53

the most irrational

00:11:54 --> 00:11:54

and illogical

00:11:54 --> 00:11:57

statement that you can make. And that's why

00:11:57 --> 00:11:59

I began with the fundamentals of logic. If

00:11:59 --> 00:12:02

you don't get this point, go back and

00:12:02 --> 00:12:04

listen to this thing from the beginning.

00:12:05 --> 00:12:08

I repeat here that if you agree,

00:12:08 --> 00:12:10

then what is the logic about saying we

00:12:10 --> 00:12:13

believe in what Rasool Allah told us about

00:12:13 --> 00:12:13

the creation.

00:12:13 --> 00:12:15

But when it comes to other things in

00:12:15 --> 00:12:18

the Quran, the laws of the Sharia, which

00:12:18 --> 00:12:20

he also told us about and commanded us

00:12:20 --> 00:12:23

to follow the same person. We will do

00:12:23 --> 00:12:25

whatever makes sense to us. We will not

00:12:25 --> 00:12:26

obey him. We will not do what he

00:12:26 --> 00:12:27

tells us.

00:12:28 --> 00:12:30

Whatever makes sense, meaning, whatever appeals to what

00:12:30 --> 00:12:32

we call logic, our logic,

00:12:33 --> 00:12:36

that would be and is the most irrational

00:12:36 --> 00:12:37

and illogical statement

00:12:45 --> 00:12:46

Allah

00:12:47 --> 00:12:47

Subhanahu

00:12:52 --> 00:12:53

wa'ala said

00:12:55 --> 00:12:56

Have you seen all Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Waqila.

00:12:56 --> 00:12:56

Have you seen all Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Waqila.

00:12:56 --> 00:12:57

Have you seen all Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Waqila.

00:12:57 --> 00:12:59

The one who has who has taken

00:13:00 --> 00:13:01

his own desires

00:13:03 --> 00:13:05

as their god. Have you seen

00:13:05 --> 00:13:06

those

00:13:06 --> 00:13:07

who have taken

00:13:08 --> 00:13:10

their own desire

00:13:10 --> 00:13:11

as,

00:13:13 --> 00:13:14

their God,

00:13:14 --> 00:13:16

will you then be a keeper or advocate

00:13:17 --> 00:13:19

over them? Allah is telling them, mister Salam,

00:13:19 --> 00:13:21

do not make intercession for them.

00:13:21 --> 00:13:22

Who? For those

00:13:23 --> 00:13:26

who give their desires, precedence over the orders

00:13:26 --> 00:13:28

of Allah. Please note that according to the

00:13:28 --> 00:13:31

fundamental laws of logic, you can neither believe

00:13:31 --> 00:13:32

that the Quran you can do around 2

00:13:32 --> 00:13:35

things. You can either believe that the Quran

00:13:35 --> 00:13:36

is divine revelation

00:13:36 --> 00:13:39

and that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah

00:13:39 --> 00:13:40

and is divinely

00:13:41 --> 00:13:41

inspired

00:13:42 --> 00:13:43

and receives

00:13:44 --> 00:13:45

and received revelation.

00:13:46 --> 00:13:48

And so we believe everything he told us

00:13:48 --> 00:13:52

not because we necessarily understand it all, but

00:13:52 --> 00:13:54

because we believe in him and trust him

00:13:54 --> 00:13:57

and believe him. Three things, believe in him,

00:13:57 --> 00:13:58

trust him, and believe him.

00:13:59 --> 00:14:01

Or the opposite that is we will only

00:14:01 --> 00:14:04

believe what makes sense to our reason, which

00:14:04 --> 00:14:07

is subject to the individual's knowledge base. Obviously,

00:14:07 --> 00:14:09

the reason of a 5 year old cannot

00:14:09 --> 00:14:12

be the reason of a 30 year old

00:14:12 --> 00:14:13

with a PhD.

00:14:13 --> 00:14:16

Then we must ask why they believe such

00:14:16 --> 00:14:16

people

00:14:17 --> 00:14:19

who say I only believe what is

00:14:20 --> 00:14:21

what appeals to my reason,

00:14:22 --> 00:14:24

ask them why do they believe

00:14:24 --> 00:14:25

in MRIs

00:14:25 --> 00:14:26

and medical,

00:14:27 --> 00:14:28

diagnostic technology,

00:14:29 --> 00:14:30

mobile phone technology,

00:14:31 --> 00:14:32

curvature of space,

00:14:32 --> 00:14:33

quarks,

00:14:33 --> 00:14:34

subatomic

00:14:34 --> 00:14:35

particles,

00:14:35 --> 00:14:38

genetic code, and a million other things which

00:14:38 --> 00:14:41

we take for granted as being true, though

00:14:41 --> 00:14:44

we have no clue and cannot even describe

00:14:44 --> 00:14:47

them. Nobody can even define them. Yet we

00:14:47 --> 00:14:48

believe them to be true. Why do we

00:14:48 --> 00:14:51

believe that? The answer can only be because

00:14:51 --> 00:14:54

we know that someone somewhere, though we don't

00:14:54 --> 00:14:56

even know who that person is, knows about

00:14:56 --> 00:14:59

them. We believe them because we believe that

00:14:59 --> 00:15:02

someone who knows them spoke the truth. In

00:15:02 --> 00:15:04

that case, the last question,

00:15:04 --> 00:15:06

what is your real belief

00:15:06 --> 00:15:08

about Rasool Allah

00:15:08 --> 00:15:11

he Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam? What is your real

00:15:11 --> 00:15:13

belief about Rasool Allah Sallallahu

00:15:13 --> 00:15:15

Think very carefully because we will be asked

00:15:15 --> 00:15:18

this question in our graves. I remind myself

00:15:18 --> 00:15:19

my brothers and sisters

00:15:19 --> 00:15:21

about what Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala said about

00:15:21 --> 00:15:24

those who pick and choose what they want

00:15:24 --> 00:15:26

to believe and obey,

00:15:29 --> 00:15:32

Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala said about them,

00:15:51 --> 00:15:53

Allah said, do you believe in some of

00:15:53 --> 00:15:56

the scripture and reject the rest? Is there

00:15:56 --> 00:15:58

any reward for those who do so among

00:15:58 --> 00:16:01

you other than disgrace in this worldly life

00:16:01 --> 00:16:04

and being subjected to the harshest punishment on

00:16:04 --> 00:16:07

the day of judgment? For Allah subhanahu wa

00:16:07 --> 00:16:08

ta'ala is never unaware

00:16:09 --> 00:16:10

of what you do.

00:16:10 --> 00:16:12

I remind myself when you selective obedience

00:16:13 --> 00:16:14

is disobedience.

00:16:14 --> 00:16:17

Selective obedience is arrogance. That is why Allah

00:16:17 --> 00:16:20

Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala warned us of such severe

00:16:20 --> 00:16:21

punishment

00:16:21 --> 00:16:24

in this life and the next. For the

00:16:24 --> 00:16:24

believer,

00:16:25 --> 00:16:27

there is only one option

00:16:27 --> 00:16:29

after having believed.

00:16:29 --> 00:16:30

Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala said,

00:16:44 --> 00:16:46

The only response of the true believers

00:16:47 --> 00:16:48

when they are called to Allah Subhanahu Wa

00:16:48 --> 00:16:49

Ta'ala and his messenger

00:16:50 --> 00:16:52

so that he may judge between them is

00:16:52 --> 00:16:55

to say we hear and we obey. It

00:16:55 --> 00:16:56

is they

00:16:56 --> 00:16:57

who will truly succeed.

00:16:58 --> 00:17:00

I remind myself when you let us be

00:17:00 --> 00:17:02

logical. Let us be reasonable.

00:17:02 --> 00:17:04

Let us be rational.

00:17:04 --> 00:17:06

Let us be very clear

00:17:06 --> 00:17:09

about all of these things and be sure

00:17:09 --> 00:17:10

that we are,

00:17:11 --> 00:17:11

rational

00:17:12 --> 00:17:13

in a way

00:17:13 --> 00:17:14

which is

00:17:14 --> 00:17:15

correct

00:17:15 --> 00:17:17

that we are rational

00:17:17 --> 00:17:19

in a rational way

00:17:19 --> 00:17:20

and not,

00:17:21 --> 00:17:22

you become irrational

00:17:23 --> 00:17:25

when it comes to using rationality

00:17:26 --> 00:17:28

to understand the kitab of Allah and the

00:17:28 --> 00:17:30

sunnah of Rasoolallahu

00:17:32 --> 00:17:32

Sallallahu

Share Page