Mirza Yawar Baig – Iman bil Ghayb #02

Mirza Yawar Baig
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speaker discusses the rational nature of their statement "slow is rational," based on their quote from the doctor and their actions based on what they have been told to say. They also mention a book by Allah that focuses on rationality and encourage people to follow it. The conversation ends with the speaker expressing their belief in their actions and their actions based on their belief in their actions and their actions based on their belief in their actions. They also discuss the holy signs of Allah and how he showed them to the people of Mecca, and the reaction of the majority of Mecca to the idea that everything is irrational.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:11 --> 00:00:12
			We continue with
		
00:00:12 --> 00:00:14
			the yesterday, which is
		
00:00:14 --> 00:00:17
			Emmanuel. Is it rational or not rational?
		
00:00:18 --> 00:00:21
			My submission to you is that Emmanuel
		
00:00:21 --> 00:00:23
			is completely and totally rational
		
00:00:24 --> 00:00:26
			because as I told you, the opposite of
		
00:00:26 --> 00:00:27
			rational is irrational.
		
00:00:27 --> 00:00:30
			So iman Bilhayb cannot possibly be irrational.
		
00:00:31 --> 00:00:32
			And if I believe as a Muslim that
		
00:00:32 --> 00:00:33
			iman Bilhayb
		
00:00:34 --> 00:00:35
			is irrational
		
00:00:36 --> 00:00:37
			then I cease to be a Muslim because
		
00:00:37 --> 00:00:39
			if I'm going to say something which Allah
		
00:00:39 --> 00:00:40
			Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala
		
00:00:41 --> 00:00:42
			declared to be true
		
00:00:43 --> 00:00:45
			as irrational, then I have to rethink my
		
00:00:45 --> 00:00:45
			iman.
		
00:00:46 --> 00:00:48
			So it is completely rational. How do I
		
00:00:48 --> 00:00:51
			say that? What is my grounds for saying
		
00:00:51 --> 00:00:52
			that iman bilharay
		
00:00:52 --> 00:00:54
			which is iman in the unperceivable
		
00:00:55 --> 00:00:58
			that this is rational. So let me explain
		
00:00:58 --> 00:00:58
			to you.
		
00:00:59 --> 00:01:00
			The thing to do is
		
00:01:00 --> 00:01:01
			to first
		
00:01:02 --> 00:01:05
			ask another question before we go to
		
00:01:06 --> 00:01:09
			is Emmanuel very rational or not. The question
		
00:01:09 --> 00:01:11
			to ask is, what is rational?
		
00:01:12 --> 00:01:14
			When I say something is rational,
		
00:01:14 --> 00:01:16
			what exactly do I mean?
		
00:01:16 --> 00:01:20
			This term rational or something irrational, the opposite
		
00:01:20 --> 00:01:22
			of that. What is the basis of that?
		
00:01:23 --> 00:01:25
			Now the usual basis
		
00:01:25 --> 00:01:26
			of rationality
		
00:01:27 --> 00:01:28
			is
		
00:01:28 --> 00:01:31
			it must be something which within quotes makes
		
00:01:31 --> 00:01:34
			sense to me, meaning which I understand.
		
00:01:35 --> 00:01:36
			So first criterion
		
00:01:37 --> 00:01:38
			of rationality,
		
00:01:38 --> 00:01:41
			which we place for ourselves is something which
		
00:01:41 --> 00:01:42
			I understand.
		
00:01:42 --> 00:01:45
			Number 2, second criterion of rationality,
		
00:01:46 --> 00:01:48
			which we we which we place for ourselves
		
00:01:48 --> 00:01:50
			and which people generally believe in is that
		
00:01:50 --> 00:01:51
			it should be something
		
00:01:52 --> 00:01:53
			which is perceivable
		
00:01:53 --> 00:01:55
			by our senses.
		
00:01:56 --> 00:01:59
			Now take these two things and put it,
		
00:02:00 --> 00:02:02
			let us look at something like,
		
00:02:02 --> 00:02:03
			nanotechnology.
		
00:02:04 --> 00:02:06
			Let us look at something like,
		
00:02:06 --> 00:02:08
			an MRI report.
		
00:02:08 --> 00:02:09
			Right?
		
00:02:09 --> 00:02:10
			If you ask me,
		
00:02:10 --> 00:02:13
			I'm a behavioral scientist. I'm a,
		
00:02:14 --> 00:02:15
			consultant to,
		
00:02:15 --> 00:02:16
			family
		
00:02:17 --> 00:02:17
			owned businesses.
		
00:02:19 --> 00:02:20
			I am a leadership trainer.
		
00:02:21 --> 00:02:22
			I am an author,
		
00:02:24 --> 00:02:25
			many books.
		
00:02:26 --> 00:02:26
			I'm,
		
00:02:28 --> 00:02:29
			an imam,
		
00:02:29 --> 00:02:31
			you know, and so on and so on.
		
00:02:32 --> 00:02:33
			But I'm not a neurologist.
		
00:02:35 --> 00:02:36
			I'm not
		
00:02:36 --> 00:02:36
			somebody
		
00:02:37 --> 00:02:39
			who can understand
		
00:02:40 --> 00:02:42
			an MRI picture.
		
00:02:42 --> 00:02:44
			So as far as I'm concerned,
		
00:02:44 --> 00:02:45
			the MRI
		
00:02:45 --> 00:02:47
			picture is just something, you know, it's like
		
00:02:47 --> 00:02:49
			maybe it's a piece of abstract art or
		
00:02:49 --> 00:02:51
			something. Right? As far as I'm concerned, it
		
00:02:51 --> 00:02:53
			makes no it makes zero sense to me.
		
00:02:53 --> 00:02:54
			So if you ask me, did you understand
		
00:02:54 --> 00:02:56
			this MRI? No. I did not understand MRI
		
00:02:56 --> 00:02:56
			whatsoever.
		
00:02:58 --> 00:03:00
			Did you understand any part of the MRI?
		
00:03:00 --> 00:03:02
			No. I did not understand any part of
		
00:03:02 --> 00:03:03
			the MRI.
		
00:03:04 --> 00:03:05
			But
		
00:03:05 --> 00:03:07
			when I take this MRI
		
00:03:07 --> 00:03:09
			to my doctor
		
00:03:09 --> 00:03:12
			and my doctor gives me certain advice based
		
00:03:12 --> 00:03:13
			on that MRI,
		
00:03:13 --> 00:03:15
			Do I believe the doctor?
		
00:03:15 --> 00:03:17
			Do I follow the advice? Of course.
		
00:03:18 --> 00:03:19
			Why do I do that when I did
		
00:03:19 --> 00:03:21
			not understand the MRI?
		
00:03:21 --> 00:03:23
			So as far as I'm concerned, my belief,
		
00:03:24 --> 00:03:26
			my following the doctor,
		
00:03:26 --> 00:03:28
			if I use this
		
00:03:28 --> 00:03:31
			definition for rationality, which is that I must
		
00:03:31 --> 00:03:32
			understand it,
		
00:03:32 --> 00:03:34
			then my behavior is completely irrational.
		
00:03:36 --> 00:03:37
			Now if I say this to you, you
		
00:03:37 --> 00:03:38
			might say no. No. Hold on a second.
		
00:03:38 --> 00:03:41
			Your behavior is not irrational because your behavior
		
00:03:41 --> 00:03:43
			is based on something else. And what is
		
00:03:43 --> 00:03:46
			that something else? You believe in the doctor.
		
00:03:47 --> 00:03:49
			You believe in the knowledge of the doctor,
		
00:03:50 --> 00:03:52
			and you believe in the good intentions of
		
00:03:52 --> 00:03:54
			your doctor. You believe that this doctor has
		
00:03:54 --> 00:03:55
			the knowledge to understand
		
00:03:56 --> 00:03:58
			what this MRI is reporting and showing,
		
00:03:59 --> 00:03:59
			and
		
00:04:00 --> 00:04:03
			you believe that this doctor wishes well for
		
00:04:03 --> 00:04:04
			you.
		
00:04:04 --> 00:04:06
			So the advice that this doctor is gonna
		
00:04:06 --> 00:04:09
			give you will be for your benefit and
		
00:04:09 --> 00:04:11
			will not harm you. Right?
		
00:04:11 --> 00:04:13
			It we our our
		
00:04:13 --> 00:04:14
			reaction
		
00:04:14 --> 00:04:15
			or our response
		
00:04:16 --> 00:04:17
			to the doctor
		
00:04:18 --> 00:04:19
			is based on these 2,
		
00:04:21 --> 00:04:22
			very important beliefs.
		
00:04:23 --> 00:04:25
			We believe them, we may not articulate these
		
00:04:25 --> 00:04:27
			beliefs, you may not talk about them, but
		
00:04:27 --> 00:04:29
			this is the basis of the belief that
		
00:04:29 --> 00:04:30
			I believe the doctor is
		
00:04:31 --> 00:04:34
			has the knowledge to understand this MRI report,
		
00:04:34 --> 00:04:37
			and I believe that the advice the doctor
		
00:04:37 --> 00:04:39
			is gonna give me will be beneficial for
		
00:04:39 --> 00:04:40
			me. Therefore,
		
00:04:41 --> 00:04:43
			even though I don't understand
		
00:04:43 --> 00:04:45
			the MRI report myself,
		
00:04:47 --> 00:04:49
			I will still do what the doctor is
		
00:04:49 --> 00:04:52
			telling me to do. This is our
		
00:04:52 --> 00:04:55
			rationality which we use in our lives. Now
		
00:04:55 --> 00:04:58
			my question is, that is exactly what Allah
		
00:04:58 --> 00:05:01
			is telling us to do when it comes
		
00:05:01 --> 00:05:03
			to his book and to the teachings of
		
00:05:03 --> 00:05:06
			this book the teachings of Muhammad which
		
00:05:08 --> 00:05:08
			is
		
00:05:09 --> 00:05:10
			believe in it
		
00:05:10 --> 00:05:11
			because
		
00:05:11 --> 00:05:15
			the Rasool, salallahu alaihi salam, said so.
		
00:05:15 --> 00:05:18
			Follow it because the Rasool, sallallahu salam, said
		
00:05:18 --> 00:05:21
			so. And why should I follow it? Because
		
00:05:21 --> 00:05:23
			of the Rasool saying it?
		
00:05:23 --> 00:05:24
			Because
		
00:05:28 --> 00:05:30
			because the Rasul does not speak of his
		
00:05:30 --> 00:05:31
			own volition.
		
00:05:32 --> 00:05:34
			The Rasool only says what he has been
		
00:05:34 --> 00:05:37
			told to say. He only narrates
		
00:05:37 --> 00:05:40
			the revelation that has been sent to him.
		
00:05:41 --> 00:05:43
			So my belief in the,
		
00:05:44 --> 00:05:45
			my belief in
		
00:05:46 --> 00:05:48
			my belief in what happens in the grave,
		
00:05:48 --> 00:05:51
			My belief in all of these things and
		
00:05:51 --> 00:05:51
			more
		
00:05:52 --> 00:05:53
			is entirely
		
00:05:53 --> 00:05:55
			and completely and totally
		
00:05:55 --> 00:05:56
			rational,
		
00:05:56 --> 00:06:00
			even though none of those things are from
		
00:06:00 --> 00:06:00
			my perception.
		
00:06:01 --> 00:06:03
			Let me give you another example.
		
00:06:03 --> 00:06:05
			The example is Allah said the first
		
00:06:13 --> 00:06:14
			Ayat
		
00:06:21 --> 00:06:23
			Allah said, all glory and majesty
		
00:06:24 --> 00:06:24
			and,
		
00:06:25 --> 00:06:27
			all greatness is for the one who took
		
00:06:27 --> 00:06:29
			his slave. In this case, Muhammad
		
00:06:30 --> 00:06:33
			from Masjid Al Haram, which is in Makkah,
		
00:06:33 --> 00:06:35
			to Masjid Al Aqsa, which is in Jerusalem,
		
00:06:36 --> 00:06:37
			in one night.
		
00:06:38 --> 00:06:40
			And from there, he took him into the
		
00:06:40 --> 00:06:40
			heavens
		
00:06:41 --> 00:06:42
			to show
		
00:06:43 --> 00:06:46
			him his signs. But the
		
00:06:47 --> 00:06:49
			the environs of which the surroundings of which
		
00:06:49 --> 00:06:51
			are holy and they are purified.
		
00:06:54 --> 00:06:55
			The around that
		
00:06:56 --> 00:06:58
			is is the blessing of Allah
		
00:06:59 --> 00:06:59
			and
		
00:07:00 --> 00:07:02
			its surroundings are blessed and
		
00:07:03 --> 00:07:06
			Allah said to show him our signs
		
00:07:10 --> 00:07:12
			to show him our signs. And for this
		
00:07:12 --> 00:07:13
			Allah
		
00:07:14 --> 00:07:15
			showed him the signs on the earth and
		
00:07:15 --> 00:07:17
			he showed him the signs in the heavens
		
00:07:17 --> 00:07:18
			in a way that pleases
		
00:07:19 --> 00:07:21
			his majesty and grace. Now
		
00:07:23 --> 00:07:26
			come back to the question of rationality, which
		
00:07:26 --> 00:07:28
			is I'm giving you now an example
		
00:07:28 --> 00:07:31
			of actual fact which happened,
		
00:07:31 --> 00:07:32
			which we know
		
00:07:32 --> 00:07:35
			from the record of the seerah. Rasool
		
00:07:35 --> 00:07:36
			went on this,
		
00:07:37 --> 00:07:38
			wonderful celestial
		
00:07:39 --> 00:07:41
			journey of Isaw al Mirad,
		
00:07:41 --> 00:07:42
			and when he returned,
		
00:07:43 --> 00:07:46
			he announced this to the people.
		
00:07:47 --> 00:07:47
			Now
		
00:07:48 --> 00:07:50
			what was the reaction of the people of
		
00:07:50 --> 00:07:50
			Mecca?
		
00:07:51 --> 00:07:53
			The reaction of the majority of the people
		
00:07:53 --> 00:07:55
			of Mecca was, this is irrational.
		
00:07:56 --> 00:07:57
			This cannot possibly happen.
		
00:07:58 --> 00:08:01
			Why? Because I don't understand how it could
		
00:08:01 --> 00:08:02
			have happened.
		
00:08:03 --> 00:08:04
			So I don't believe you
		
00:08:05 --> 00:08:08
			because this is not part of my experience
		
00:08:08 --> 00:08:08
			in life.
		
00:08:09 --> 00:08:10
			Right?
		
00:08:11 --> 00:08:13
			I don't believe this could have happened to
		
00:08:13 --> 00:08:15
			you because it could not could not have
		
00:08:15 --> 00:08:17
			happened to me. I don't believe this happened
		
00:08:17 --> 00:08:18
			to you because it did not happen to
		
00:08:18 --> 00:08:21
			me. I believe this I do not believe
		
00:08:21 --> 00:08:22
			that this is how you feel. This is
		
00:08:22 --> 00:08:24
			what you saw because I never felt that
		
00:08:24 --> 00:08:26
			and I never saw that.
		
00:08:26 --> 00:08:29
			I'm I'm deliberately saying these things because to
		
00:08:29 --> 00:08:30
			show you how irrational
		
00:08:31 --> 00:08:32
			that kind of an argument
		
00:08:32 --> 00:08:35
			is. You will not say the same thing
		
00:08:35 --> 00:08:38
			to anybody else for anything else about anything
		
00:08:38 --> 00:08:39
			else.
		
00:08:39 --> 00:08:40
			Right? Never. Because
		
00:08:41 --> 00:08:43
			we know that there are many people in
		
00:08:43 --> 00:08:44
			the world who
		
00:08:45 --> 00:08:47
			have all kinds of amazing experiences,
		
00:08:48 --> 00:08:49
			and we believe them because we believe them
		
00:08:49 --> 00:08:51
			because we know they are not lying. We
		
00:08:51 --> 00:08:53
			we know they are not liars and cheats,
		
00:08:53 --> 00:08:54
			so we believe them.
		
00:08:55 --> 00:08:57
			But in this case, we say no. We
		
00:08:57 --> 00:09:00
			say, well, you know, I haven't seen it.
		
00:09:00 --> 00:09:02
			Didn't happen to me, so therefore, I do
		
00:09:02 --> 00:09:04
			not believe it. Now
		
00:09:06 --> 00:09:07
			people came to our work
		
00:09:08 --> 00:09:10
			and they said to him, do you know
		
00:09:10 --> 00:09:11
			what your friend is saying? This is what
		
00:09:11 --> 00:09:13
			he is saying. He said your friend is
		
00:09:13 --> 00:09:15
			saying that in one night he went from
		
00:09:15 --> 00:09:18
			Mecca to Jerusalem and then up in the
		
00:09:18 --> 00:09:18
			heavens
		
00:09:19 --> 00:09:22
			and he saw whatever you saw and so
		
00:09:22 --> 00:09:24
			on so forth and he came back,
		
00:09:24 --> 00:09:27
			do you believe that? Abokar said this, the
		
00:09:28 --> 00:09:29
			response was what he said
		
00:09:30 --> 00:09:32
			If he said that, I believe.
		
00:09:32 --> 00:09:35
			He did not say yes. It happened. No.
		
00:09:35 --> 00:09:37
			It didn't happen. He said if he said
		
00:09:37 --> 00:09:39
			that. So what is the what is the
		
00:09:39 --> 00:09:39
			question
		
00:09:40 --> 00:09:41
			to be verified?
		
00:09:41 --> 00:09:44
			The question to be verified is not whether
		
00:09:44 --> 00:09:46
			what he said makes sense, doesn't make sense,
		
00:09:46 --> 00:09:47
			reasonable, not reasonable,
		
00:09:48 --> 00:09:50
			scientific, not scientific, logical, not logical.
		
00:09:51 --> 00:09:52
			The thing to verify is,
		
00:09:53 --> 00:09:55
			did he say it? If he said it,
		
00:09:55 --> 00:09:59
			I believe it no matter what it looks
		
00:09:59 --> 00:10:01
			like to you or me.
		
00:10:01 --> 00:10:03
			And what is the reason for that?
		
00:10:04 --> 00:10:05
			Exactly the same reason
		
00:10:06 --> 00:10:08
			for which I believe my doctor
		
00:10:09 --> 00:10:11
			because I believe the doctor.
		
00:10:12 --> 00:10:14
			I believe that the doctor's knowledge is superior
		
00:10:14 --> 00:10:17
			to mine. I believe that the doctor can
		
00:10:17 --> 00:10:19
			see things that I can't see not because
		
00:10:19 --> 00:10:19
			he,
		
00:10:20 --> 00:10:22
			he's got some kind of, you know, superior
		
00:10:22 --> 00:10:25
			vision, but because we see with our knowledge.
		
00:10:25 --> 00:10:27
			We don't just see with our eyes.
		
00:10:28 --> 00:10:30
			So the doctor is able to see things
		
00:10:30 --> 00:10:32
			in the report, in the MRI report, which
		
00:10:32 --> 00:10:34
			I cannot see because he has knowledge which
		
00:10:34 --> 00:10:36
			is superior, which is specialized,
		
00:10:36 --> 00:10:38
			which I don't have. So what do I
		
00:10:38 --> 00:10:39
			do? I
		
00:10:40 --> 00:10:43
			believe the doctor because I know the doctor
		
00:10:43 --> 00:10:45
			wishes well for me. So the question for
		
00:10:46 --> 00:10:48
			to ask ourselves is, what do we believe
		
00:10:48 --> 00:10:51
			about Rasulullah SAW WALLAM? Do we believe that
		
00:10:51 --> 00:10:53
			he his knowledge was superior to ours or
		
00:10:53 --> 00:10:55
			not? Do we believe that he wished well
		
00:10:55 --> 00:10:57
			for us or not?
		
00:10:57 --> 00:10:59
			It's as simple as that. If I believe
		
00:10:59 --> 00:11:01
			that the knowledge of the Rasool alayhis salaam
		
00:11:01 --> 00:11:03
			was not just superior, but there is not
		
00:11:03 --> 00:11:04
			even a comparison
		
00:11:05 --> 00:11:07
			between his knowledge and my knowledge, and this
		
00:11:07 --> 00:11:09
			is this is my belief and Allah is
		
00:11:09 --> 00:11:09
			my witness.
		
00:11:10 --> 00:11:13
			And I believe that Rasool, alayhis salatu wa
		
00:11:13 --> 00:11:13
			salam,
		
00:11:14 --> 00:11:16
			wished the best for me and for his
		
00:11:16 --> 00:11:17
			entire ummah
		
00:11:18 --> 00:11:20
			more than my own mother would have wished
		
00:11:20 --> 00:11:21
			for me, my own father would have wished
		
00:11:21 --> 00:11:23
			for me, and this is also my iman
		
00:11:23 --> 00:11:26
			and Yaqeen, my witness, then I believe that
		
00:11:26 --> 00:11:27
			Rasool, alayhis salaam.
		
00:11:28 --> 00:11:29
			I don't ask questions,
		
00:11:29 --> 00:11:32
			not because I am believing blind, but because
		
00:11:32 --> 00:11:34
			I am believing with complete rationality
		
00:11:35 --> 00:11:36
			in the messengership
		
00:11:36 --> 00:11:38
			of Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam.
		
00:11:39 --> 00:11:42
			So I'm not concerned with, do I understand
		
00:11:42 --> 00:11:42
			this
		
00:11:43 --> 00:11:46
			concept in my mind? Because I know that
		
00:11:46 --> 00:11:48
			with my knowledge, I can only understand that
		
00:11:48 --> 00:11:50
			much. If I can't understand an MRI, MRI,
		
00:11:50 --> 00:11:52
			how the * am I supposed to understand
		
00:11:52 --> 00:11:53
			what happens in the grave or what happens
		
00:11:53 --> 00:11:55
			in the other day of judgment and so
		
00:11:55 --> 00:11:57
			on and so forth? I have to go
		
00:11:57 --> 00:12:00
			by the word of somebody whose knowledge is
		
00:12:00 --> 00:12:03
			superior to mine and in whose good intention,
		
00:12:04 --> 00:12:06
			in whose love for me and concern for
		
00:12:06 --> 00:12:07
			me I have complete and total faith, and
		
00:12:07 --> 00:12:09
			that is Muhammad.
		
00:12:12 --> 00:12:15
			This is the meaning of iman bil rayb