Mirza Yawar Baig – Iman bil Ghayb #02

Mirza Yawar Baig
AI: Summary ©
The speaker discusses the rational nature of their statement "slow is rational," based on their quote from the doctor and their actions based on what they have been told to say. They also mention a book by Allah that focuses on rationality and encourage people to follow it. The conversation ends with the speaker expressing their belief in their actions and their actions based on their belief in their actions and their actions based on their belief in their actions. They also discuss the holy signs of Allah and how he showed them to the people of Mecca, and the reaction of the majority of Mecca to the idea that everything is irrational.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:11 --> 00:00:12

We continue with

00:00:12 --> 00:00:14

the yesterday, which is

00:00:14 --> 00:00:17

Emmanuel. Is it rational or not rational?

00:00:18 --> 00:00:21

My submission to you is that Emmanuel

00:00:21 --> 00:00:23

is completely and totally rational

00:00:24 --> 00:00:26

because as I told you, the opposite of

00:00:26 --> 00:00:27

rational is irrational.

00:00:27 --> 00:00:30

So iman Bilhayb cannot possibly be irrational.

00:00:31 --> 00:00:32

And if I believe as a Muslim that

00:00:32 --> 00:00:33

iman Bilhayb

00:00:34 --> 00:00:35

is irrational

00:00:36 --> 00:00:37

then I cease to be a Muslim because

00:00:37 --> 00:00:39

if I'm going to say something which Allah

00:00:39 --> 00:00:40

Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala

00:00:41 --> 00:00:42

declared to be true

00:00:43 --> 00:00:45

as irrational, then I have to rethink my

00:00:45 --> 00:00:45

iman.

00:00:46 --> 00:00:48

So it is completely rational. How do I

00:00:48 --> 00:00:51

say that? What is my grounds for saying

00:00:51 --> 00:00:52

that iman bilharay

00:00:52 --> 00:00:54

which is iman in the unperceivable

00:00:55 --> 00:00:58

that this is rational. So let me explain

00:00:58 --> 00:00:58

to you.

00:00:59 --> 00:01:00

The thing to do is

00:01:00 --> 00:01:01

to first

00:01:02 --> 00:01:05

ask another question before we go to

00:01:06 --> 00:01:09

is Emmanuel very rational or not. The question

00:01:09 --> 00:01:11

to ask is, what is rational?

00:01:12 --> 00:01:14

When I say something is rational,

00:01:14 --> 00:01:16

what exactly do I mean?

00:01:16 --> 00:01:20

This term rational or something irrational, the opposite

00:01:20 --> 00:01:22

of that. What is the basis of that?

00:01:23 --> 00:01:25

Now the usual basis

00:01:25 --> 00:01:26

of rationality

00:01:27 --> 00:01:28

is

00:01:28 --> 00:01:31

it must be something which within quotes makes

00:01:31 --> 00:01:34

sense to me, meaning which I understand.

00:01:35 --> 00:01:36

So first criterion

00:01:37 --> 00:01:38

of rationality,

00:01:38 --> 00:01:41

which we place for ourselves is something which

00:01:41 --> 00:01:42

I understand.

00:01:42 --> 00:01:45

Number 2, second criterion of rationality,

00:01:46 --> 00:01:48

which we we which we place for ourselves

00:01:48 --> 00:01:50

and which people generally believe in is that

00:01:50 --> 00:01:51

it should be something

00:01:52 --> 00:01:53

which is perceivable

00:01:53 --> 00:01:55

by our senses.

00:01:56 --> 00:01:59

Now take these two things and put it,

00:02:00 --> 00:02:02

let us look at something like,

00:02:02 --> 00:02:03

nanotechnology.

00:02:04 --> 00:02:06

Let us look at something like,

00:02:06 --> 00:02:08

an MRI report.

00:02:08 --> 00:02:09

Right?

00:02:09 --> 00:02:10

If you ask me,

00:02:10 --> 00:02:13

I'm a behavioral scientist. I'm a,

00:02:14 --> 00:02:15

consultant to,

00:02:15 --> 00:02:16

family

00:02:17 --> 00:02:17

owned businesses.

00:02:19 --> 00:02:20

I am a leadership trainer.

00:02:21 --> 00:02:22

I am an author,

00:02:24 --> 00:02:25

many books.

00:02:26 --> 00:02:26

I'm,

00:02:28 --> 00:02:29

an imam,

00:02:29 --> 00:02:31

you know, and so on and so on.

00:02:32 --> 00:02:33

But I'm not a neurologist.

00:02:35 --> 00:02:36

I'm not

00:02:36 --> 00:02:36

somebody

00:02:37 --> 00:02:39

who can understand

00:02:40 --> 00:02:42

an MRI picture.

00:02:42 --> 00:02:44

So as far as I'm concerned,

00:02:44 --> 00:02:45

the MRI

00:02:45 --> 00:02:47

picture is just something, you know, it's like

00:02:47 --> 00:02:49

maybe it's a piece of abstract art or

00:02:49 --> 00:02:51

something. Right? As far as I'm concerned, it

00:02:51 --> 00:02:53

makes no it makes zero sense to me.

00:02:53 --> 00:02:54

So if you ask me, did you understand

00:02:54 --> 00:02:56

this MRI? No. I did not understand MRI

00:02:56 --> 00:02:56

whatsoever.

00:02:58 --> 00:03:00

Did you understand any part of the MRI?

00:03:00 --> 00:03:02

No. I did not understand any part of

00:03:02 --> 00:03:03

the MRI.

00:03:04 --> 00:03:05

But

00:03:05 --> 00:03:07

when I take this MRI

00:03:07 --> 00:03:09

to my doctor

00:03:09 --> 00:03:12

and my doctor gives me certain advice based

00:03:12 --> 00:03:13

on that MRI,

00:03:13 --> 00:03:15

Do I believe the doctor?

00:03:15 --> 00:03:17

Do I follow the advice? Of course.

00:03:18 --> 00:03:19

Why do I do that when I did

00:03:19 --> 00:03:21

not understand the MRI?

00:03:21 --> 00:03:23

So as far as I'm concerned, my belief,

00:03:24 --> 00:03:26

my following the doctor,

00:03:26 --> 00:03:28

if I use this

00:03:28 --> 00:03:31

definition for rationality, which is that I must

00:03:31 --> 00:03:32

understand it,

00:03:32 --> 00:03:34

then my behavior is completely irrational.

00:03:36 --> 00:03:37

Now if I say this to you, you

00:03:37 --> 00:03:38

might say no. No. Hold on a second.

00:03:38 --> 00:03:41

Your behavior is not irrational because your behavior

00:03:41 --> 00:03:43

is based on something else. And what is

00:03:43 --> 00:03:46

that something else? You believe in the doctor.

00:03:47 --> 00:03:49

You believe in the knowledge of the doctor,

00:03:50 --> 00:03:52

and you believe in the good intentions of

00:03:52 --> 00:03:54

your doctor. You believe that this doctor has

00:03:54 --> 00:03:55

the knowledge to understand

00:03:56 --> 00:03:58

what this MRI is reporting and showing,

00:03:59 --> 00:03:59

and

00:04:00 --> 00:04:03

you believe that this doctor wishes well for

00:04:03 --> 00:04:04

you.

00:04:04 --> 00:04:06

So the advice that this doctor is gonna

00:04:06 --> 00:04:09

give you will be for your benefit and

00:04:09 --> 00:04:11

will not harm you. Right?

00:04:11 --> 00:04:13

It we our our

00:04:13 --> 00:04:14

reaction

00:04:14 --> 00:04:15

or our response

00:04:16 --> 00:04:17

to the doctor

00:04:18 --> 00:04:19

is based on these 2,

00:04:21 --> 00:04:22

very important beliefs.

00:04:23 --> 00:04:25

We believe them, we may not articulate these

00:04:25 --> 00:04:27

beliefs, you may not talk about them, but

00:04:27 --> 00:04:29

this is the basis of the belief that

00:04:29 --> 00:04:30

I believe the doctor is

00:04:31 --> 00:04:34

has the knowledge to understand this MRI report,

00:04:34 --> 00:04:37

and I believe that the advice the doctor

00:04:37 --> 00:04:39

is gonna give me will be beneficial for

00:04:39 --> 00:04:40

me. Therefore,

00:04:41 --> 00:04:43

even though I don't understand

00:04:43 --> 00:04:45

the MRI report myself,

00:04:47 --> 00:04:49

I will still do what the doctor is

00:04:49 --> 00:04:52

telling me to do. This is our

00:04:52 --> 00:04:55

rationality which we use in our lives. Now

00:04:55 --> 00:04:58

my question is, that is exactly what Allah

00:04:58 --> 00:05:01

is telling us to do when it comes

00:05:01 --> 00:05:03

to his book and to the teachings of

00:05:03 --> 00:05:06

this book the teachings of Muhammad which

00:05:08 --> 00:05:08

is

00:05:09 --> 00:05:10

believe in it

00:05:10 --> 00:05:11

because

00:05:11 --> 00:05:15

the Rasool, salallahu alaihi salam, said so.

00:05:15 --> 00:05:18

Follow it because the Rasool, sallallahu salam, said

00:05:18 --> 00:05:21

so. And why should I follow it? Because

00:05:21 --> 00:05:23

of the Rasool saying it?

00:05:23 --> 00:05:24

Because

00:05:28 --> 00:05:30

because the Rasul does not speak of his

00:05:30 --> 00:05:31

own volition.

00:05:32 --> 00:05:34

The Rasool only says what he has been

00:05:34 --> 00:05:37

told to say. He only narrates

00:05:37 --> 00:05:40

the revelation that has been sent to him.

00:05:41 --> 00:05:43

So my belief in the,

00:05:44 --> 00:05:45

my belief in

00:05:46 --> 00:05:48

my belief in what happens in the grave,

00:05:48 --> 00:05:51

My belief in all of these things and

00:05:51 --> 00:05:51

more

00:05:52 --> 00:05:53

is entirely

00:05:53 --> 00:05:55

and completely and totally

00:05:55 --> 00:05:56

rational,

00:05:56 --> 00:06:00

even though none of those things are from

00:06:00 --> 00:06:00

my perception.

00:06:01 --> 00:06:03

Let me give you another example.

00:06:03 --> 00:06:05

The example is Allah said the first

00:06:13 --> 00:06:14

Ayat

00:06:21 --> 00:06:23

Allah said, all glory and majesty

00:06:24 --> 00:06:24

and,

00:06:25 --> 00:06:27

all greatness is for the one who took

00:06:27 --> 00:06:29

his slave. In this case, Muhammad

00:06:30 --> 00:06:33

from Masjid Al Haram, which is in Makkah,

00:06:33 --> 00:06:35

to Masjid Al Aqsa, which is in Jerusalem,

00:06:36 --> 00:06:37

in one night.

00:06:38 --> 00:06:40

And from there, he took him into the

00:06:40 --> 00:06:40

heavens

00:06:41 --> 00:06:42

to show

00:06:43 --> 00:06:46

him his signs. But the

00:06:47 --> 00:06:49

the environs of which the surroundings of which

00:06:49 --> 00:06:51

are holy and they are purified.

00:06:54 --> 00:06:55

The around that

00:06:56 --> 00:06:58

is is the blessing of Allah

00:06:59 --> 00:06:59

and

00:07:00 --> 00:07:02

its surroundings are blessed and

00:07:03 --> 00:07:06

Allah said to show him our signs

00:07:10 --> 00:07:12

to show him our signs. And for this

00:07:12 --> 00:07:13

Allah

00:07:14 --> 00:07:15

showed him the signs on the earth and

00:07:15 --> 00:07:17

he showed him the signs in the heavens

00:07:17 --> 00:07:18

in a way that pleases

00:07:19 --> 00:07:21

his majesty and grace. Now

00:07:23 --> 00:07:26

come back to the question of rationality, which

00:07:26 --> 00:07:28

is I'm giving you now an example

00:07:28 --> 00:07:31

of actual fact which happened,

00:07:31 --> 00:07:32

which we know

00:07:32 --> 00:07:35

from the record of the seerah. Rasool

00:07:35 --> 00:07:36

went on this,

00:07:37 --> 00:07:38

wonderful celestial

00:07:39 --> 00:07:41

journey of Isaw al Mirad,

00:07:41 --> 00:07:42

and when he returned,

00:07:43 --> 00:07:46

he announced this to the people.

00:07:47 --> 00:07:47

Now

00:07:48 --> 00:07:50

what was the reaction of the people of

00:07:50 --> 00:07:50

Mecca?

00:07:51 --> 00:07:53

The reaction of the majority of the people

00:07:53 --> 00:07:55

of Mecca was, this is irrational.

00:07:56 --> 00:07:57

This cannot possibly happen.

00:07:58 --> 00:08:01

Why? Because I don't understand how it could

00:08:01 --> 00:08:02

have happened.

00:08:03 --> 00:08:04

So I don't believe you

00:08:05 --> 00:08:08

because this is not part of my experience

00:08:08 --> 00:08:08

in life.

00:08:09 --> 00:08:10

Right?

00:08:11 --> 00:08:13

I don't believe this could have happened to

00:08:13 --> 00:08:15

you because it could not could not have

00:08:15 --> 00:08:17

happened to me. I don't believe this happened

00:08:17 --> 00:08:18

to you because it did not happen to

00:08:18 --> 00:08:21

me. I believe this I do not believe

00:08:21 --> 00:08:22

that this is how you feel. This is

00:08:22 --> 00:08:24

what you saw because I never felt that

00:08:24 --> 00:08:26

and I never saw that.

00:08:26 --> 00:08:29

I'm I'm deliberately saying these things because to

00:08:29 --> 00:08:30

show you how irrational

00:08:31 --> 00:08:32

that kind of an argument

00:08:32 --> 00:08:35

is. You will not say the same thing

00:08:35 --> 00:08:38

to anybody else for anything else about anything

00:08:38 --> 00:08:39

else.

00:08:39 --> 00:08:40

Right? Never. Because

00:08:41 --> 00:08:43

we know that there are many people in

00:08:43 --> 00:08:44

the world who

00:08:45 --> 00:08:47

have all kinds of amazing experiences,

00:08:48 --> 00:08:49

and we believe them because we believe them

00:08:49 --> 00:08:51

because we know they are not lying. We

00:08:51 --> 00:08:53

we know they are not liars and cheats,

00:08:53 --> 00:08:54

so we believe them.

00:08:55 --> 00:08:57

But in this case, we say no. We

00:08:57 --> 00:09:00

say, well, you know, I haven't seen it.

00:09:00 --> 00:09:02

Didn't happen to me, so therefore, I do

00:09:02 --> 00:09:04

not believe it. Now

00:09:06 --> 00:09:07

people came to our work

00:09:08 --> 00:09:10

and they said to him, do you know

00:09:10 --> 00:09:11

what your friend is saying? This is what

00:09:11 --> 00:09:13

he is saying. He said your friend is

00:09:13 --> 00:09:15

saying that in one night he went from

00:09:15 --> 00:09:18

Mecca to Jerusalem and then up in the

00:09:18 --> 00:09:18

heavens

00:09:19 --> 00:09:22

and he saw whatever you saw and so

00:09:22 --> 00:09:24

on so forth and he came back,

00:09:24 --> 00:09:27

do you believe that? Abokar said this, the

00:09:28 --> 00:09:29

response was what he said

00:09:30 --> 00:09:32

If he said that, I believe.

00:09:32 --> 00:09:35

He did not say yes. It happened. No.

00:09:35 --> 00:09:37

It didn't happen. He said if he said

00:09:37 --> 00:09:39

that. So what is the what is the

00:09:39 --> 00:09:39

question

00:09:40 --> 00:09:41

to be verified?

00:09:41 --> 00:09:44

The question to be verified is not whether

00:09:44 --> 00:09:46

what he said makes sense, doesn't make sense,

00:09:46 --> 00:09:47

reasonable, not reasonable,

00:09:48 --> 00:09:50

scientific, not scientific, logical, not logical.

00:09:51 --> 00:09:52

The thing to verify is,

00:09:53 --> 00:09:55

did he say it? If he said it,

00:09:55 --> 00:09:59

I believe it no matter what it looks

00:09:59 --> 00:10:01

like to you or me.

00:10:01 --> 00:10:03

And what is the reason for that?

00:10:04 --> 00:10:05

Exactly the same reason

00:10:06 --> 00:10:08

for which I believe my doctor

00:10:09 --> 00:10:11

because I believe the doctor.

00:10:12 --> 00:10:14

I believe that the doctor's knowledge is superior

00:10:14 --> 00:10:17

to mine. I believe that the doctor can

00:10:17 --> 00:10:19

see things that I can't see not because

00:10:19 --> 00:10:19

he,

00:10:20 --> 00:10:22

he's got some kind of, you know, superior

00:10:22 --> 00:10:25

vision, but because we see with our knowledge.

00:10:25 --> 00:10:27

We don't just see with our eyes.

00:10:28 --> 00:10:30

So the doctor is able to see things

00:10:30 --> 00:10:32

in the report, in the MRI report, which

00:10:32 --> 00:10:34

I cannot see because he has knowledge which

00:10:34 --> 00:10:36

is superior, which is specialized,

00:10:36 --> 00:10:38

which I don't have. So what do I

00:10:38 --> 00:10:39

do? I

00:10:40 --> 00:10:43

believe the doctor because I know the doctor

00:10:43 --> 00:10:45

wishes well for me. So the question for

00:10:46 --> 00:10:48

to ask ourselves is, what do we believe

00:10:48 --> 00:10:51

about Rasulullah SAW WALLAM? Do we believe that

00:10:51 --> 00:10:53

he his knowledge was superior to ours or

00:10:53 --> 00:10:55

not? Do we believe that he wished well

00:10:55 --> 00:10:57

for us or not?

00:10:57 --> 00:10:59

It's as simple as that. If I believe

00:10:59 --> 00:11:01

that the knowledge of the Rasool alayhis salaam

00:11:01 --> 00:11:03

was not just superior, but there is not

00:11:03 --> 00:11:04

even a comparison

00:11:05 --> 00:11:07

between his knowledge and my knowledge, and this

00:11:07 --> 00:11:09

is this is my belief and Allah is

00:11:09 --> 00:11:09

my witness.

00:11:10 --> 00:11:13

And I believe that Rasool, alayhis salatu wa

00:11:13 --> 00:11:13

salam,

00:11:14 --> 00:11:16

wished the best for me and for his

00:11:16 --> 00:11:17

entire ummah

00:11:18 --> 00:11:20

more than my own mother would have wished

00:11:20 --> 00:11:21

for me, my own father would have wished

00:11:21 --> 00:11:23

for me, and this is also my iman

00:11:23 --> 00:11:26

and Yaqeen, my witness, then I believe that

00:11:26 --> 00:11:27

Rasool, alayhis salaam.

00:11:28 --> 00:11:29

I don't ask questions,

00:11:29 --> 00:11:32

not because I am believing blind, but because

00:11:32 --> 00:11:34

I am believing with complete rationality

00:11:35 --> 00:11:36

in the messengership

00:11:36 --> 00:11:38

of Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam.

00:11:39 --> 00:11:42

So I'm not concerned with, do I understand

00:11:42 --> 00:11:42

this

00:11:43 --> 00:11:46

concept in my mind? Because I know that

00:11:46 --> 00:11:48

with my knowledge, I can only understand that

00:11:48 --> 00:11:50

much. If I can't understand an MRI, MRI,

00:11:50 --> 00:11:52

how the * am I supposed to understand

00:11:52 --> 00:11:53

what happens in the grave or what happens

00:11:53 --> 00:11:55

in the other day of judgment and so

00:11:55 --> 00:11:57

on and so forth? I have to go

00:11:57 --> 00:12:00

by the word of somebody whose knowledge is

00:12:00 --> 00:12:03

superior to mine and in whose good intention,

00:12:04 --> 00:12:06

in whose love for me and concern for

00:12:06 --> 00:12:07

me I have complete and total faith, and

00:12:07 --> 00:12:09

that is Muhammad.

00:12:12 --> 00:12:15

This is the meaning of iman bil rayb

Share Page