Imtiaz Sooliman – Victoria Street tragedy address the 72hour rule

Imtiaz Sooliman
AI: Summary ©
The conversation is difficult to follow and appears to be a discussion of a disaster in a Catholic Church. There is speculation that people may not be returning to work until they see people missing, and that there may be a lot of people missing. The speakers express uncertainty and fear, but hope that the situation will be resolved.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:00 --> 00:00:01

Alira de beer from the George bureau

00:00:03 --> 00:00:07

with Doctor India. Suleiman, the head of gift of the givers here at

00:00:07 --> 00:00:12

the disaster site. Doctor Suleiman, have you been briefed on

00:00:12 --> 00:00:16

the situation? And will you please have your comment on Well,

00:00:18 --> 00:00:21

we've seen far worse, bigger situations in other parts of the

00:00:21 --> 00:00:26

world. I don't follow the 72 hour rule because I've we've twice.

00:00:26 --> 00:00:28

We've taken our people alive on day 880,

00:00:29 --> 00:00:30

on the 20th of January, 2010

00:00:31 --> 00:00:34

but that is a collapsed Catholic Church. It wasn't a five story.

00:00:35 --> 00:00:39

But while saying that, on the 13th of February last year, we took out

00:00:39 --> 00:00:43

a 90 year old grandmother in a 12 study, historically, that's

00:00:43 --> 00:00:47

totally can take an eight days later we took out, while saying

00:00:47 --> 00:00:51

that I strongly believe that they don't have much opportunity or

00:00:51 --> 00:00:56

chance to take anybody else out now, for several reasons. One is

00:00:56 --> 00:01:00

the stuffed dogs are not taking absent of like people anymore, and

00:01:00 --> 00:01:04

that's been happening from late yesterday. Secondly, and the

00:01:04 --> 00:01:06

biggest problem is that people are trapped under 3000

00:01:07 --> 00:01:08

tons of concrete.

00:01:10 --> 00:01:13

There was hope for those living who were caught up in the

00:01:13 --> 00:01:17

basement, because that's where our dogs picked up for livelihood on

00:01:17 --> 00:01:20

early hours of Tuesday morning. But it doesn't seem now that

00:01:20 --> 00:01:24

there's anybody else we can be wrong, and now, because of the

00:01:24 --> 00:01:28

bodies starting to decompose, getting confused, always

00:01:28 --> 00:01:31

atmosphere, but that's becoming a problem. He finally made alive,

00:01:32 --> 00:01:32

because even

00:01:35 --> 00:01:36

the ones that came out alive,

00:01:38 --> 00:01:41

many of them were severely indigenous. But severely

00:01:42 --> 00:01:44

I think 16 of them were in

00:01:46 --> 00:01:47

a clinical condition.

00:01:48 --> 00:01:51

So I don't know. But also, we have to be part of the following. But

00:01:51 --> 00:01:51

also,

00:01:53 --> 00:01:54

we've seen that the

00:01:55 --> 00:01:59

operation is moving from using small equipment. Every machinery

00:01:59 --> 00:02:01

is coming this afternoon, that's demolition,

00:02:02 --> 00:02:06

which, in other words, sending the message that this the respite

00:02:06 --> 00:02:10

phase is over. We now go in a recovery phase, and the priority

00:02:10 --> 00:02:13

is to move all that problem. There's no guarantee what we will

00:02:13 --> 00:02:17

find and how many people will find. The figures, it may be a bit

00:02:17 --> 00:02:21

of a problem. Today I see somebody say it's gone up to 44 missing. I

00:02:21 --> 00:02:24

don't know how far that is true. Nobody will really know. The only

00:02:24 --> 00:02:27

way we will know is if all the family members come here to this

00:02:27 --> 00:02:30

wall and say, my loved one is missing, that's the only way you

00:02:30 --> 00:02:33

would find the exact number of people missing after you suspect

00:02:33 --> 00:02:36

what we found already, whether passed on or alive,

00:02:37 --> 00:02:40

and commonly on a building site growing from history of builders.

00:02:40 --> 00:02:44

A lot of people don't turn up for work on a Monday. No, they and

00:02:44 --> 00:02:48

they define some excuse for this, and especially you for a

00:02:48 --> 00:02:50

nationally maybe swing fire. I've seen it so many time in my own

00:02:50 --> 00:02:53

work situation, you know, where people just don't come to work on

00:02:53 --> 00:02:56

a Monday. And it's possible, and maybe any since it was two

00:02:56 --> 00:02:59

o'clock, it's possible at one o'clock lunch time, they're gonna

00:02:59 --> 00:03:02

take a walk somewhere. You know, it's just, this is all

00:03:02 --> 00:03:06

speculation, but hopefully that happened, and hopefully less

00:03:06 --> 00:03:10

people came to work on Monday, because nobody's exactly going to

00:03:10 --> 00:03:12

know, oh, the amount, the amount of people, because they're a

00:03:12 --> 00:03:16

contractor, a subcontractor, and yet somebody else. So nobody knows

00:03:16 --> 00:03:19

the exact figure. You know, I'm not sure if they kept proper

00:03:19 --> 00:03:21

account for how many people were working there for each

00:03:21 --> 00:03:25

subcontractor, I am praying silently that a lot of people were

00:03:25 --> 00:03:29

away from work at lunchtime on Monday. And as I said, the only

00:03:29 --> 00:03:33

way that we'll really know definitely is to go into the hall

00:03:33 --> 00:03:36

where the families are waiting and ask who's missing. That will

00:03:36 --> 00:03:39

probably the only way we'll get exactly that.

Share Page