Ihab Saad – MultiEmployer worksites

Ihab Saad
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speaker discusses the four types of employers and how they can avoid violations of safety guidelines. They explain that the controlling, creating, and the correcting employers may have different responsibilities, and that the violations can be addressed by the claims claims department. The speaker also provides guidance on how to ensure proper protection and prevent further violations.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:02 --> 00:00:05
			Music. Welcome to another safety
class, and today we're going to
		
00:00:05 --> 00:00:10
			talk about multi employer work
sites. In many cases, actually, in
		
00:00:10 --> 00:00:13
			most of the cases, you're going to
have several contractors working
		
00:00:13 --> 00:00:16
			on the same site, contractors,
subcontractors, maybe prime
		
00:00:16 --> 00:00:20
			contractors, multi prime
contractors, and they're going to
		
00:00:20 --> 00:00:25
			have different operations taking
place at the same time. So what if
		
00:00:25 --> 00:00:29
			there's a safety violation? Which
one should be cited for that
		
00:00:29 --> 00:00:30
			safety violation?
		
00:00:31 --> 00:00:34
			If more than one are involved in
the same operation, the same
		
00:00:34 --> 00:00:38
			location, again, how are things
going to be sorted out? So this is
		
00:00:38 --> 00:00:41
			primarily the subject of our
lecture today.
		
00:00:44 --> 00:00:48
			According to OSHA, there are four
different types of employers, and
		
00:00:48 --> 00:00:53
			these are the controlling employer
who is responsible for and has the
		
00:00:53 --> 00:00:56
			authority to control conditions on
the website. So if, for example,
		
00:00:56 --> 00:01:00
			we have one general contractor or
one prime contractor, then in this
		
00:01:00 --> 00:01:05
			case, that would be a controlling
employer. The second one is a
		
00:01:05 --> 00:01:09
			creating employer, who's an
employer whose employees created
		
00:01:09 --> 00:01:14
			the hazards. Let's say, for
example, there was a an electrical
		
00:01:14 --> 00:01:18
			cable that was left exposed not
properly is related or not
		
00:01:18 --> 00:01:23
			properly protected, and that was
due to the work of the electrical
		
00:01:23 --> 00:01:26
			subcontractor. So in this case,
the electrical subcontractor would
		
00:01:26 --> 00:01:28
			become the creating employer.
		
00:01:29 --> 00:01:33
			The third one is the exposing
employer, an employer whose
		
00:01:33 --> 00:01:37
			employees are exposed to the
hazards. Let's say we have another
		
00:01:37 --> 00:01:40
			mechanical contractor working in
the same area where that
		
00:01:40 --> 00:01:45
			electrical cable exists. So in
this case, the employees of that
		
00:01:45 --> 00:01:49
			mechanical contractor are going to
be exposed to the hazard of
		
00:01:49 --> 00:01:53
			electrocution, and the mechanical
contractor would would, in this
		
00:01:53 --> 00:01:55
			case, become the exposing
employer.
		
00:01:56 --> 00:02:00
			The fourth and last one is the
correcting employer, which is the
		
00:02:00 --> 00:02:03
			employer who has the
responsibility for actually
		
00:02:03 --> 00:02:07
			correcting the hazard. In this
case, one of the top two is going
		
00:02:07 --> 00:02:11
			to be the correcting employer. It
might be either the controlling
		
00:02:11 --> 00:02:14
			employer, because he's the one in
charge he or she's the one in
		
00:02:14 --> 00:02:18
			charge of the whole site, or it
could be the creating employer,
		
00:02:18 --> 00:02:21
			the One who created that hazard in
the first place.
		
00:02:24 --> 00:02:28
			So normally, citations are issued
to the exposing employer, the one
		
00:02:28 --> 00:02:34
			that caused the hazard, those
whose employees are exposed to
		
00:02:34 --> 00:02:39
			hazards. Additionally, the
creating, the controlling and the
		
00:02:39 --> 00:02:44
			correcting employers may also be
cited if they did not do anything
		
00:02:44 --> 00:02:47
			about correcting that hazard,
whether or not their own employees
		
00:02:47 --> 00:02:53
			are also exposed. So the the first
one to be cited is going to be the
		
00:02:53 --> 00:02:57
			exposing employer. In this case,
is going to be the mechanical
		
00:02:57 --> 00:03:00
			contractor, because they saw the
cable they expose their employees
		
00:03:00 --> 00:03:02
			to that electrocution hazard, and
		
00:03:04 --> 00:03:06
			they did not do anything about it.
Someone might say, what can they
		
00:03:06 --> 00:03:09
			do about it? They're not the
electrical contractor, the
		
00:03:09 --> 00:03:13
			creating contractor. They're not
the controlling contractor, which
		
00:03:13 --> 00:03:17
			is the general contractor. At
least they could have notified the
		
00:03:17 --> 00:03:20
			general contractor, who's the
controlling and the controlling
		
00:03:20 --> 00:03:23
			contractor could have contacted
the creating
		
00:03:24 --> 00:03:28
			contractor or employer to correct
that issue, but since they did not
		
00:03:28 --> 00:03:31
			act, that is their share of the
blame.
		
00:03:35 --> 00:03:39
			The exposing employers normally
cited, but that employer may have
		
00:03:39 --> 00:03:44
			a legitimate defense to the
citation. If the exposing employer
		
00:03:44 --> 00:03:49
			can meet all five of the following
conditions or defenses, then that
		
00:03:49 --> 00:03:53
			exposing employer shall not be
cited. And in this case, it might
		
00:03:53 --> 00:03:57
			be the creating and the
controlling contractors or
		
00:03:57 --> 00:03:59
			employers who are going to be
cited. What are these five
		
00:03:59 --> 00:04:04
			defenses? Well, the conditions for
an exposing employer's defense
		
00:04:04 --> 00:04:08
			against citation. First, he did
not create, he or she did not
		
00:04:08 --> 00:04:12
			create the hazard, so the employer
did not create the hazard. Second,
		
00:04:13 --> 00:04:15
			did they correct the hazard? The
employer did not have the
		
00:04:15 --> 00:04:20
			responsibility or the authority to
have the hazard corrected. Third
		
00:04:20 --> 00:04:24
			is ability. The employer did not
have the ability to correct or
		
00:04:24 --> 00:04:25
			remove the hazard.
		
00:04:26 --> 00:04:26
			Fourth,
		
00:04:28 --> 00:04:31
			notified others. Did he notify
others? The employer notified
		
00:04:31 --> 00:04:34
			others the creating and the
controlling and or the correcting
		
00:04:34 --> 00:04:38
			employers about the hazard to
which his or her employees are
		
00:04:38 --> 00:04:43
			exposed. And the fifth and final
defense is going to be recognition
		
00:04:43 --> 00:04:47
			of the hazard itself. The employer
has instructed or trained his
		
00:04:47 --> 00:04:50
			employees or her employees to
recognize the hazard and were
		
00:04:50 --> 00:04:54
			feasible. The exposing employer
has taken appropriate alternative
		
00:04:54 --> 00:04:58
			means of protecting employees from
the hazard, and when extreme
		
00:04:58 --> 00:04:59
			circumstances just.
		
00:05:00 --> 00:05:03
			Fiat, the exposing employer should
have removed his or her employees
		
00:05:04 --> 00:05:08
			from the job to avoid citation.
Now, if these five conditions are
		
00:05:08 --> 00:05:13
			satisfied in the exposing
employer, then they're not going
		
00:05:13 --> 00:05:16
			to be cited. They did their best.
They recognized the hazard, they
		
00:05:16 --> 00:05:20
			protected their employees by
removing them from the area. They
		
00:05:20 --> 00:05:23
			tried to change it, they notified
someone about changing it, at
		
00:05:23 --> 00:05:23
			least.
		
00:05:26 --> 00:05:30
			If the employer whose employees
were exposed to a hazard meets the
		
00:05:30 --> 00:05:33
			above five conditions, then the
citation shall be issued someone
		
00:05:33 --> 00:05:36
			is going to be blamed definitely,
but who's going to be blamed? In
		
00:05:36 --> 00:05:40
			this case, the citation shall be
issued to the creating employer
		
00:05:40 --> 00:05:44
			and or the correcting employer,
because someone the correcting
		
00:05:44 --> 00:05:48
			employer might be the same as the
creating employer, it might be the
		
00:05:48 --> 00:05:51
			same as the controlling employer,
or might be someone different. The
		
00:05:51 --> 00:05:55
			controlling employer shall also be
cited, even though no employees of
		
00:05:55 --> 00:05:59
			that employer may have been
exposed to the violating condition
		
00:05:59 --> 00:06:03
			because they are in control of the
whole site, therefore the title
		
00:06:03 --> 00:06:04
			controlling employee.
		
00:06:06 --> 00:06:10
			So basically, this is a brief
summary about what are the
		
00:06:10 --> 00:06:14
			different responsibility on the
site. Make sure to know your
		
00:06:14 --> 00:06:17
			responsibilities, whether you are
the controlling, whether you are
		
00:06:17 --> 00:06:22
			the creating, whether you are the
exposing or whether you are the
		
00:06:22 --> 00:06:26
			correcting employer, and make sure
that, just in case you are the
		
00:06:26 --> 00:06:30
			exposing employer, you have all
five defenses ready, and you
		
00:06:30 --> 00:06:34
			implement them to protect yourself
against citation from OSHA. I'll
		
00:06:34 --> 00:06:35
			see you in the next lecture.