Ihab Saad – MultiEmployer worksites

Ihab Saad
AI: Summary ©
The speaker discusses the four types of employers and how they can avoid violations of safety guidelines. They explain that the controlling, creating, and the correcting employers may have different responsibilities, and that the violations can be addressed by the claims claims department. The speaker also provides guidance on how to ensure proper protection and prevent further violations.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:02 --> 00:00:05

Music. Welcome to another safety class, and today we're going to

00:00:05 --> 00:00:10

talk about multi employer work sites. In many cases, actually, in

00:00:10 --> 00:00:13

most of the cases, you're going to have several contractors working

00:00:13 --> 00:00:16

on the same site, contractors, subcontractors, maybe prime

00:00:16 --> 00:00:20

contractors, multi prime contractors, and they're going to

00:00:20 --> 00:00:25

have different operations taking place at the same time. So what if

00:00:25 --> 00:00:29

there's a safety violation? Which one should be cited for that

00:00:29 --> 00:00:30

safety violation?

00:00:31 --> 00:00:34

If more than one are involved in the same operation, the same

00:00:34 --> 00:00:38

location, again, how are things going to be sorted out? So this is

00:00:38 --> 00:00:41

primarily the subject of our lecture today.

00:00:44 --> 00:00:48

According to OSHA, there are four different types of employers, and

00:00:48 --> 00:00:53

these are the controlling employer who is responsible for and has the

00:00:53 --> 00:00:56

authority to control conditions on the website. So if, for example,

00:00:56 --> 00:01:00

we have one general contractor or one prime contractor, then in this

00:01:00 --> 00:01:05

case, that would be a controlling employer. The second one is a

00:01:05 --> 00:01:09

creating employer, who's an employer whose employees created

00:01:09 --> 00:01:14

the hazards. Let's say, for example, there was a an electrical

00:01:14 --> 00:01:18

cable that was left exposed not properly is related or not

00:01:18 --> 00:01:23

properly protected, and that was due to the work of the electrical

00:01:23 --> 00:01:26

subcontractor. So in this case, the electrical subcontractor would

00:01:26 --> 00:01:28

become the creating employer.

00:01:29 --> 00:01:33

The third one is the exposing employer, an employer whose

00:01:33 --> 00:01:37

employees are exposed to the hazards. Let's say we have another

00:01:37 --> 00:01:40

mechanical contractor working in the same area where that

00:01:40 --> 00:01:45

electrical cable exists. So in this case, the employees of that

00:01:45 --> 00:01:49

mechanical contractor are going to be exposed to the hazard of

00:01:49 --> 00:01:53

electrocution, and the mechanical contractor would would, in this

00:01:53 --> 00:01:55

case, become the exposing employer.

00:01:56 --> 00:02:00

The fourth and last one is the correcting employer, which is the

00:02:00 --> 00:02:03

employer who has the responsibility for actually

00:02:03 --> 00:02:07

correcting the hazard. In this case, one of the top two is going

00:02:07 --> 00:02:11

to be the correcting employer. It might be either the controlling

00:02:11 --> 00:02:14

employer, because he's the one in charge he or she's the one in

00:02:14 --> 00:02:18

charge of the whole site, or it could be the creating employer,

00:02:18 --> 00:02:21

the One who created that hazard in the first place.

00:02:24 --> 00:02:28

So normally, citations are issued to the exposing employer, the one

00:02:28 --> 00:02:34

that caused the hazard, those whose employees are exposed to

00:02:34 --> 00:02:39

hazards. Additionally, the creating, the controlling and the

00:02:39 --> 00:02:44

correcting employers may also be cited if they did not do anything

00:02:44 --> 00:02:47

about correcting that hazard, whether or not their own employees

00:02:47 --> 00:02:53

are also exposed. So the the first one to be cited is going to be the

00:02:53 --> 00:02:57

exposing employer. In this case, is going to be the mechanical

00:02:57 --> 00:03:00

contractor, because they saw the cable they expose their employees

00:03:00 --> 00:03:02

to that electrocution hazard, and

00:03:04 --> 00:03:06

they did not do anything about it. Someone might say, what can they

00:03:06 --> 00:03:09

do about it? They're not the electrical contractor, the

00:03:09 --> 00:03:13

creating contractor. They're not the controlling contractor, which

00:03:13 --> 00:03:17

is the general contractor. At least they could have notified the

00:03:17 --> 00:03:20

general contractor, who's the controlling and the controlling

00:03:20 --> 00:03:23

contractor could have contacted the creating

00:03:24 --> 00:03:28

contractor or employer to correct that issue, but since they did not

00:03:28 --> 00:03:31

act, that is their share of the blame.

00:03:35 --> 00:03:39

The exposing employers normally cited, but that employer may have

00:03:39 --> 00:03:44

a legitimate defense to the citation. If the exposing employer

00:03:44 --> 00:03:49

can meet all five of the following conditions or defenses, then that

00:03:49 --> 00:03:53

exposing employer shall not be cited. And in this case, it might

00:03:53 --> 00:03:57

be the creating and the controlling contractors or

00:03:57 --> 00:03:59

employers who are going to be cited. What are these five

00:03:59 --> 00:04:04

defenses? Well, the conditions for an exposing employer's defense

00:04:04 --> 00:04:08

against citation. First, he did not create, he or she did not

00:04:08 --> 00:04:12

create the hazard, so the employer did not create the hazard. Second,

00:04:13 --> 00:04:15

did they correct the hazard? The employer did not have the

00:04:15 --> 00:04:20

responsibility or the authority to have the hazard corrected. Third

00:04:20 --> 00:04:24

is ability. The employer did not have the ability to correct or

00:04:24 --> 00:04:25

remove the hazard.

00:04:26 --> 00:04:26

Fourth,

00:04:28 --> 00:04:31

notified others. Did he notify others? The employer notified

00:04:31 --> 00:04:34

others the creating and the controlling and or the correcting

00:04:34 --> 00:04:38

employers about the hazard to which his or her employees are

00:04:38 --> 00:04:43

exposed. And the fifth and final defense is going to be recognition

00:04:43 --> 00:04:47

of the hazard itself. The employer has instructed or trained his

00:04:47 --> 00:04:50

employees or her employees to recognize the hazard and were

00:04:50 --> 00:04:54

feasible. The exposing employer has taken appropriate alternative

00:04:54 --> 00:04:58

means of protecting employees from the hazard, and when extreme

00:04:58 --> 00:04:59

circumstances just.

00:05:00 --> 00:05:03

Fiat, the exposing employer should have removed his or her employees

00:05:04 --> 00:05:08

from the job to avoid citation. Now, if these five conditions are

00:05:08 --> 00:05:13

satisfied in the exposing employer, then they're not going

00:05:13 --> 00:05:16

to be cited. They did their best. They recognized the hazard, they

00:05:16 --> 00:05:20

protected their employees by removing them from the area. They

00:05:20 --> 00:05:23

tried to change it, they notified someone about changing it, at

00:05:23 --> 00:05:23

least.

00:05:26 --> 00:05:30

If the employer whose employees were exposed to a hazard meets the

00:05:30 --> 00:05:33

above five conditions, then the citation shall be issued someone

00:05:33 --> 00:05:36

is going to be blamed definitely, but who's going to be blamed? In

00:05:36 --> 00:05:40

this case, the citation shall be issued to the creating employer

00:05:40 --> 00:05:44

and or the correcting employer, because someone the correcting

00:05:44 --> 00:05:48

employer might be the same as the creating employer, it might be the

00:05:48 --> 00:05:51

same as the controlling employer, or might be someone different. The

00:05:51 --> 00:05:55

controlling employer shall also be cited, even though no employees of

00:05:55 --> 00:05:59

that employer may have been exposed to the violating condition

00:05:59 --> 00:06:03

because they are in control of the whole site, therefore the title

00:06:03 --> 00:06:04

controlling employee.

00:06:06 --> 00:06:10

So basically, this is a brief summary about what are the

00:06:10 --> 00:06:14

different responsibility on the site. Make sure to know your

00:06:14 --> 00:06:17

responsibilities, whether you are the controlling, whether you are

00:06:17 --> 00:06:22

the creating, whether you are the exposing or whether you are the

00:06:22 --> 00:06:26

correcting employer, and make sure that, just in case you are the

00:06:26 --> 00:06:30

exposing employer, you have all five defenses ready, and you

00:06:30 --> 00:06:34

implement them to protect yourself against citation from OSHA. I'll

00:06:34 --> 00:06:35

see you in the next lecture.

Share Page