Haitham al-Haddad – Who Should we Vote for in UKs MayoralElections

Haitham al-Haddad
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speaker discusses the importance of not just using punishing as a decision factor for a vote, but evaluating other options based on past experiences and past achievements. They also emphasize the need to support independent movements and suppressing political parties. The speaker emphasizes the importance of not just using punishing as a decision factor, but evaluating other options based on past experiences and achievements.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:00 --> 00:00:02
			I think this is a very good question,
		
00:00:03 --> 00:00:03
			and
		
00:00:04 --> 00:00:06
			I don't think that this question is limited
		
00:00:06 --> 00:00:09
			to the mayoral election, but also,
		
00:00:10 --> 00:00:12
			it covers the general election.
		
00:00:13 --> 00:00:15
			Now see, brothers and sisters,
		
00:00:16 --> 00:00:18
			one big mistake
		
00:00:18 --> 00:00:19
			in the democratic
		
00:00:20 --> 00:00:22
			process or if you want to say that
		
00:00:22 --> 00:00:22
			democratic
		
00:00:23 --> 00:00:24
			game,
		
00:00:24 --> 00:00:25
			yeah,
		
00:00:26 --> 00:00:26
			is that
		
00:00:27 --> 00:00:30
			don't vote based on emotions.
		
00:00:33 --> 00:00:34
			It doesn't work.
		
00:00:35 --> 00:00:36
			The harm of it
		
00:00:37 --> 00:00:37
			overweighs,
		
00:00:38 --> 00:00:39
			yeah,
		
00:00:40 --> 00:00:42
			the the the benefits of it, if there
		
00:00:42 --> 00:00:45
			is any benefit or if there are benefits.
		
00:00:46 --> 00:00:46
			So
		
00:00:47 --> 00:00:48
			I think,
		
00:00:49 --> 00:00:51
			the premise here, which is we want to
		
00:00:51 --> 00:00:52
			punish labor,
		
00:00:53 --> 00:00:55
			yeah, is the wrong premise.
		
00:00:57 --> 00:00:59
			Even if we say that it is a
		
00:00:59 --> 00:01:00
			strategic decision,
		
00:01:01 --> 00:01:03
			that should not be the premise. The premise
		
00:01:03 --> 00:01:05
			is we want to to
		
00:01:05 --> 00:01:07
			have a strategic decision
		
00:01:08 --> 00:01:11
			by not voting, for example, in this case,
		
00:01:11 --> 00:01:11
			labor,
		
00:01:12 --> 00:01:13
			because the other option
		
00:01:14 --> 00:01:15
			is better.
		
00:01:15 --> 00:01:18
			So there is a Russian behind it. There
		
00:01:18 --> 00:01:19
			is a strategy.
		
00:01:19 --> 00:01:21
			Not just we want to punish
		
00:01:21 --> 00:01:24
			this candidate, that candidate. We want to punish
		
00:01:25 --> 00:01:27
			labor, and we and then,
		
00:01:28 --> 00:01:30
			we should vote anyone else,
		
00:01:30 --> 00:01:33
			or we should abstain from voting.
		
00:01:34 --> 00:01:36
			I'm talking about the it as a general
		
00:01:36 --> 00:01:37
			concept.
		
00:01:38 --> 00:01:41
			See, I am in Istanbul now. Okay?
		
00:01:42 --> 00:01:42
			And
		
00:01:43 --> 00:01:44
			I'm meeting different people,
		
00:01:45 --> 00:01:46
			and yesterday,
		
00:01:46 --> 00:01:49
			I was saying to some close people to
		
00:01:49 --> 00:01:52
			me without mentioning their name. I said to
		
00:01:52 --> 00:01:54
			them, are you happy that
		
00:01:54 --> 00:01:56
			AK party lost now?
		
00:01:58 --> 00:01:59
			They said,
		
00:01:59 --> 00:02:02
			no. I said, but you used to say
		
00:02:02 --> 00:02:05
			that we will we want to punish Erdogan.
		
00:02:05 --> 00:02:08
			We want to punish AK Parti.
		
00:02:09 --> 00:02:10
			And then
		
00:02:11 --> 00:02:13
			some of those people that I spoke to,
		
00:02:13 --> 00:02:14
			including the students,
		
00:02:15 --> 00:02:17
			they said, no. We didn't vote, actually.
		
00:02:17 --> 00:02:19
			Neither for Jhepe,
		
00:02:19 --> 00:02:22
			the winning party in this in most of
		
00:02:22 --> 00:02:23
			the cities, actually,
		
00:02:24 --> 00:02:25
			in this community.
		
00:02:26 --> 00:02:28
			Yeah. Okay. Local elections,
		
00:02:29 --> 00:02:31
			and, we didn't vote. I said,
		
00:02:32 --> 00:02:32
			Okay.
		
00:02:35 --> 00:02:36
			You didn't vote. Actually,
		
00:02:37 --> 00:02:38
			you voted for who?
		
00:02:39 --> 00:02:40
			Actually, my niece
		
00:02:41 --> 00:02:44
			who is young. She realized this. She said,
		
00:02:44 --> 00:02:46
			yeah. You are right, Anurag.
		
00:02:46 --> 00:02:48
			Those who didn't
		
00:02:48 --> 00:02:51
			many, they didn't vote and they gave a
		
00:02:51 --> 00:02:53
			support us. They want to have voted.
		
00:02:54 --> 00:02:55
			Okay?
		
00:02:55 --> 00:02:59
			That's it. So brothers and sisters, in conclusion,
		
00:02:59 --> 00:03:01
			don't just use
		
00:03:01 --> 00:03:02
			punishing
		
00:03:03 --> 00:03:05
			as the deciding factor
		
00:03:05 --> 00:03:06
			for your,
		
00:03:07 --> 00:03:08
			for your
		
00:03:08 --> 00:03:09
			voting.
		
00:03:09 --> 00:03:11
			If we were to say this,
		
00:03:11 --> 00:03:13
			okay, we need to think of the other
		
00:03:13 --> 00:03:14
			possibilities.
		
00:03:15 --> 00:03:16
			So,
		
00:03:16 --> 00:03:17
			okay,
		
00:03:17 --> 00:03:20
			I agree with let me agree with you.
		
00:03:21 --> 00:03:24
			Then we would be rewarding another party.
		
00:03:25 --> 00:03:26
			Is that true or not?
		
00:03:27 --> 00:03:28
			So we will punish
		
00:03:28 --> 00:03:31
			labor and we will reward other parties
		
00:03:31 --> 00:03:32
			that maybe
		
00:03:33 --> 00:03:34
			if they were empowered,
		
00:03:34 --> 00:03:36
			they will be worse than labor.
		
00:03:37 --> 00:03:38
			And that's why
		
00:03:39 --> 00:03:41
			in the world of elections and democracy,
		
00:03:42 --> 00:03:45
			you need to what? You need in fact
		
00:03:45 --> 00:03:47
			in fact, this is an Islamic principle.
		
00:03:53 --> 00:03:54
			Don't insult the,
		
00:03:55 --> 00:03:56
			gods of the disbelievers.
		
00:03:57 --> 00:03:59
			If they are going to insult as a
		
00:03:59 --> 00:04:00
			retaliation,
		
00:04:00 --> 00:04:02
			if they are going to insult
		
00:04:03 --> 00:04:06
			Allah This means that look at the bigger
		
00:04:06 --> 00:04:06
			picture,
		
00:04:07 --> 00:04:08
			think of the consequences.
		
00:04:09 --> 00:04:11
			The scholars of Fosid Al Firth, they used
		
00:04:11 --> 00:04:12
			to say,
		
00:04:17 --> 00:04:19
			are connected to the outcome of that.
		
00:04:19 --> 00:04:20
			Therefore,
		
00:04:20 --> 00:04:22
			before I think of punishing
		
00:04:22 --> 00:04:24
			labor, am I
		
00:04:24 --> 00:04:25
			rewarding
		
00:04:26 --> 00:04:27
			any other party
		
00:04:28 --> 00:04:30
			that is going to be worse than
		
00:04:31 --> 00:04:32
			labor?
		
00:04:33 --> 00:04:36
			Yeah? Am I going to punish this candidate,
		
00:04:36 --> 00:04:38
			this particular candidate,
		
00:04:38 --> 00:04:42
			and reward another candidate? And don't say that
		
00:04:42 --> 00:04:45
			we will abstain from voting, or we will
		
00:04:45 --> 00:04:46
			vote for independent,
		
00:04:47 --> 00:04:49
			okay, or some of our, you know,
		
00:04:50 --> 00:04:50
			independent,
		
00:04:51 --> 00:04:52
			candidates
		
00:04:52 --> 00:04:53
			because
		
00:04:54 --> 00:04:56
			that in of itself, if it is not
		
00:04:56 --> 00:04:56
			done
		
00:04:57 --> 00:04:58
			based on statistics
		
00:04:59 --> 00:05:01
			and and facts as much as we can,
		
00:05:01 --> 00:05:04
			then that is considered to be what?
		
00:05:04 --> 00:05:05
			Rewarding
		
00:05:05 --> 00:05:06
			another
		
00:05:06 --> 00:05:08
			party that is
		
00:05:08 --> 00:05:09
			worse than labor.
		
00:05:10 --> 00:05:10
			Yeah?
		
00:05:11 --> 00:05:13
			So I would like to add, if you
		
00:05:13 --> 00:05:15
			allow me, I would like to add for
		
00:05:15 --> 00:05:18
			this statement that you used, which is don't
		
00:05:18 --> 00:05:19
			we want to punish
		
00:05:20 --> 00:05:21
			labor. We want to send them a strong
		
00:05:21 --> 00:05:24
			message. Let us add to it. Okay. Punish
		
00:05:24 --> 00:05:25
			labor,
		
00:05:25 --> 00:05:26
			but
		
00:05:26 --> 00:05:27
			don't reward
		
00:05:28 --> 00:05:30
			those who are worse than labor.
		
00:05:31 --> 00:05:32
			Yeah?
		
00:05:32 --> 00:05:35
			This is the key point. Now in terms
		
00:05:35 --> 00:05:36
			of the mayoral
		
00:05:36 --> 00:05:37
			election,
		
00:05:40 --> 00:05:42
			do we have other options other than,
		
00:05:43 --> 00:05:45
			forget about the labor. Do we have other
		
00:05:45 --> 00:05:47
			options other than Saiedel Khan?
		
00:05:48 --> 00:05:50
			Yeah? Other viable
		
00:05:51 --> 00:05:51
			options?
		
00:05:53 --> 00:05:54
			Do we have that?
		
00:05:54 --> 00:05:58
			Okay. And brothers and sisters, in, again, in
		
00:05:58 --> 00:05:58
			politics
		
00:05:59 --> 00:06:00
			and in the the democratic,
		
00:06:01 --> 00:06:02
			process,
		
00:06:02 --> 00:06:04
			You don't evaluate
		
00:06:04 --> 00:06:05
			a person
		
00:06:06 --> 00:06:07
			based on his statements,
		
00:06:08 --> 00:06:08
			his,
		
00:06:09 --> 00:06:10
			maybe tactics,
		
00:06:10 --> 00:06:11
			etcetera.
		
00:06:11 --> 00:06:15
			No. You, number 1, you evaluate
		
00:06:16 --> 00:06:17
			the party or the individual
		
00:06:18 --> 00:06:19
			based on
		
00:06:20 --> 00:06:21
			his strategy,
		
00:06:21 --> 00:06:22
			not tactics,
		
00:06:22 --> 00:06:24
			and there is a difference between tactics
		
00:06:25 --> 00:06:25
			and
		
00:06:26 --> 00:06:26
			strategy.
		
00:06:27 --> 00:06:28
			Number 1. And strategy
		
00:06:29 --> 00:06:31
			is decided by his past.
		
00:06:31 --> 00:06:32
			Yeah?
		
00:06:32 --> 00:06:34
			Deciding by his other
		
00:06:36 --> 00:06:38
			achievements, his his failure,
		
00:06:39 --> 00:06:40
			conceptualizing
		
00:06:40 --> 00:06:41
			those achievements,
		
00:06:42 --> 00:06:42
			contextualizing
		
00:06:43 --> 00:06:44
			those failures.
		
00:06:45 --> 00:06:45
			Yeah?
		
00:06:46 --> 00:06:47
			Also studying
		
00:06:47 --> 00:06:48
			his,
		
00:06:48 --> 00:06:51
			his manifesto or his future.
		
00:06:51 --> 00:06:55
			Okay? This is how to evaluate him. Now
		
00:06:55 --> 00:06:56
			also,
		
00:06:56 --> 00:06:59
			when you evaluate him, you need to evaluate
		
00:06:59 --> 00:07:00
			the other candidates.
		
00:07:00 --> 00:07:02
			If they were in the position,
		
00:07:03 --> 00:07:05
			Are they going to do better?
		
00:07:07 --> 00:07:09
			Yeah? Yeah. Okay.
		
00:07:10 --> 00:07:13
			Now are you telling me, doctor Selma, yeah,
		
00:07:14 --> 00:07:15
			that if
		
00:07:16 --> 00:07:16
			the conservative
		
00:07:18 --> 00:07:19
			were in power,
		
00:07:19 --> 00:07:20
			will they
		
00:07:21 --> 00:07:22
			condemn
		
00:07:23 --> 00:07:24
			Israel? Will they condemn,
		
00:07:25 --> 00:07:25
			okay,
		
00:07:26 --> 00:07:26
			the
		
00:07:27 --> 00:07:28
			Zionists?
		
00:07:30 --> 00:07:31
			They'll Will they condemn the
		
00:07:32 --> 00:07:33
			occupation?
		
00:07:33 --> 00:07:37
			No. Absolutely not. Okay. Now some people say,
		
00:07:37 --> 00:07:39
			no, we know you need to go for
		
00:07:39 --> 00:07:39
			independent.
		
00:07:40 --> 00:07:40
			They
		
00:07:41 --> 00:07:42
			can win.
		
00:07:42 --> 00:07:45
			Yeah. If there is a possibility for them
		
00:07:45 --> 00:07:48
			to win, then go for it. Yeah? According
		
00:07:48 --> 00:07:50
			to the parties, yes. By voting for them
		
00:07:51 --> 00:07:53
			just a minute. By voting for them, actually,
		
00:07:53 --> 00:07:54
			you are rewarding
		
00:07:55 --> 00:07:56
			certain parties.
		
00:07:57 --> 00:07:59
			Yeah. It is simple. And by the way,
		
00:08:00 --> 00:08:01
			doctor Salman,
		
00:08:01 --> 00:08:04
			you know, I'm not saying, okay, we need
		
00:08:04 --> 00:08:04
			to,
		
00:08:05 --> 00:08:08
			vote labor. Because for GLA, for example, Greater
		
00:08:08 --> 00:08:09
			London Authority,
		
00:08:10 --> 00:08:11
			don't vote labor.
		
00:08:12 --> 00:08:14
			Yeah? Show them that we are not happy
		
00:08:14 --> 00:08:17
			with them. Don't vote Labour. Yeah. And you
		
00:08:17 --> 00:08:18
			know that,
		
00:08:18 --> 00:08:21
			I'm working with the brothers from the Muslim
		
00:08:21 --> 00:08:24
			vote. Okay? And we never agreed to vote
		
00:08:24 --> 00:08:25
			labor.
		
00:08:25 --> 00:08:28
			Yeah? We said we need to check what
		
00:08:28 --> 00:08:30
			is the best for each
		
00:08:31 --> 00:08:33
			community, for each constituency.
		
00:08:34 --> 00:08:36
			They are not. Okay? Certain things that he
		
00:08:36 --> 00:08:39
			did. They are, of course, on Islamic. We
		
00:08:39 --> 00:08:41
			agree. We know about that. Yeah. But does
		
00:08:41 --> 00:08:45
			that mean that the the his, what, opponent
		
00:08:45 --> 00:08:47
			will do Islamic things?
		
00:08:47 --> 00:08:49
			Do you think that
		
00:08:49 --> 00:08:51
			the conservative or the Turei
		
00:08:52 --> 00:08:52
			candidate
		
00:08:53 --> 00:08:54
			will be,
		
00:08:55 --> 00:08:57
			forget about pro Palestine
		
00:08:58 --> 00:08:58
			issue
		
00:08:58 --> 00:09:00
			or pro administrations,
		
00:09:01 --> 00:09:01
			will be,
		
00:09:02 --> 00:09:06
			will will will will the candidate be just
		
00:09:06 --> 00:09:07
			in terms of
		
00:09:08 --> 00:09:09
			allowing those demonstrations
		
00:09:10 --> 00:09:11
			and protest,
		
00:09:11 --> 00:09:12
			or,
		
00:09:13 --> 00:09:15
			is the candidate going to work
		
00:09:17 --> 00:09:17
			actively
		
00:09:19 --> 00:09:21
			to to to suppress or to stop those
		
00:09:21 --> 00:09:22
			demonstrations.
		
00:09:23 --> 00:09:25
			So this is this is a critical thing
		
00:09:25 --> 00:09:28
			because now London is the hub of those
		
00:09:28 --> 00:09:29
			demonstrations.
		
00:09:29 --> 00:09:31
			And if we are not allowed to,
		
00:09:32 --> 00:09:36
			demonstrate in London, forget about just Palestine issue.
		
00:09:36 --> 00:09:38
			Anything, they this is the key issue. And
		
00:09:38 --> 00:09:41
			that's why even for the non Muslims, they
		
00:09:41 --> 00:09:44
			need to understand this, that once we are
		
00:09:44 --> 00:09:44
			supporting
		
00:09:44 --> 00:09:45
			the ministrations
		
00:09:45 --> 00:09:49
			for Palestine or we are actually supporting the
		
00:09:49 --> 00:09:49
			ministrations
		
00:09:51 --> 00:09:53
			for the people's choice,
		
00:09:53 --> 00:09:56
			which is, as they say, the heart of
		
00:09:56 --> 00:09:58
			the democratic game.
		
00:09:59 --> 00:10:00
			Now, unfortunately,
		
00:10:01 --> 00:10:02
			the the the establishment
		
00:10:03 --> 00:10:05
			or many elements of the establishment,
		
00:10:06 --> 00:10:08
			they don't want any opposition
		
00:10:09 --> 00:10:11
			to their agenda, to their policies.
		
00:10:12 --> 00:10:13
			Yeah. And
		
00:10:13 --> 00:10:15
			they they want to suppress
		
00:10:16 --> 00:10:16
			any,
		
00:10:17 --> 00:10:17
			agenda,
		
00:10:19 --> 00:10:19
			sorry.
		
00:10:20 --> 00:10:23
			Not agenda, any opposition for their agenda.
		
00:10:23 --> 00:10:26
			So that's why we say even to non
		
00:10:26 --> 00:10:28
			Muslims, you need to support us in this
		
00:10:28 --> 00:10:30
			issue because it became
		
00:10:31 --> 00:10:31
			iconic,
		
00:10:32 --> 00:10:35
			You know? It it became an icon for
		
00:10:35 --> 00:10:37
			those who want to,
		
00:10:38 --> 00:10:39
			to demonstrate for their
		
00:10:40 --> 00:10:40
			independent,
		
00:10:41 --> 00:10:44
			a choice for their true freedom, true
		
00:10:44 --> 00:10:45
			freedom,
		
00:10:45 --> 00:10:49
			yeah, for their true choice for the true,
		
00:10:53 --> 00:10:53
			democracy.