Haitham al-Haddad – Who Should we Vote for in UKs MayoralElections

Haitham al-Haddad
AI: Summary © The speaker discusses the importance of not just using punishing as a decision factor for a vote, but evaluating other options based on past experiences and past achievements. They also emphasize the need to support independent movements and suppressing political parties. The speaker emphasizes the importance of not just using punishing as a decision factor, but evaluating other options based on past experiences and achievements.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:00 --> 00:00:02

I think this is a very good question,

00:00:03 --> 00:00:03

and

00:00:04 --> 00:00:06

I don't think that this question is limited

00:00:06 --> 00:00:09

to the mayoral election, but also,

00:00:10 --> 00:00:12

it covers the general election.

00:00:13 --> 00:00:15

Now see, brothers and sisters,

00:00:16 --> 00:00:18

one big mistake

00:00:18 --> 00:00:19

in the democratic

00:00:20 --> 00:00:22

process or if you want to say that

00:00:22 --> 00:00:22

democratic

00:00:23 --> 00:00:24

game,

00:00:24 --> 00:00:25

yeah,

00:00:26 --> 00:00:26

is that

00:00:27 --> 00:00:30

don't vote based on emotions.

00:00:33 --> 00:00:34

It doesn't work.

00:00:35 --> 00:00:36

The harm of it

00:00:37 --> 00:00:37

overweighs,

00:00:38 --> 00:00:39

yeah,

00:00:40 --> 00:00:42

the the the benefits of it, if there

00:00:42 --> 00:00:45

is any benefit or if there are benefits.

00:00:46 --> 00:00:46

So

00:00:47 --> 00:00:48

I think,

00:00:49 --> 00:00:51

the premise here, which is we want to

00:00:51 --> 00:00:52

punish labor,

00:00:53 --> 00:00:55

yeah, is the wrong premise.

00:00:57 --> 00:00:59

Even if we say that it is a

00:00:59 --> 00:01:00

strategic decision,

00:01:01 --> 00:01:03

that should not be the premise. The premise

00:01:03 --> 00:01:05

is we want to to

00:01:05 --> 00:01:07

have a strategic decision

00:01:08 --> 00:01:11

by not voting, for example, in this case,

00:01:11 --> 00:01:11

labor,

00:01:12 --> 00:01:13

because the other option

00:01:14 --> 00:01:15

is better.

00:01:15 --> 00:01:18

So there is a Russian behind it. There

00:01:18 --> 00:01:19

is a strategy.

00:01:19 --> 00:01:21

Not just we want to punish

00:01:21 --> 00:01:24

this candidate, that candidate. We want to punish

00:01:25 --> 00:01:27

labor, and we and then,

00:01:28 --> 00:01:30

we should vote anyone else,

00:01:30 --> 00:01:33

or we should abstain from voting.

00:01:34 --> 00:01:36

I'm talking about the it as a general

00:01:36 --> 00:01:37

concept.

00:01:38 --> 00:01:41

See, I am in Istanbul now. Okay?

00:01:42 --> 00:01:42

And

00:01:43 --> 00:01:44

I'm meeting different people,

00:01:45 --> 00:01:46

and yesterday,

00:01:46 --> 00:01:49

I was saying to some close people to

00:01:49 --> 00:01:52

me without mentioning their name. I said to

00:01:52 --> 00:01:54

them, are you happy that

00:01:54 --> 00:01:56

AK party lost now?

00:01:58 --> 00:01:59

They said,

00:01:59 --> 00:02:02

no. I said, but you used to say

00:02:02 --> 00:02:05

that we will we want to punish Erdogan.

00:02:05 --> 00:02:08

We want to punish AK Parti.

00:02:09 --> 00:02:10

And then

00:02:11 --> 00:02:13

some of those people that I spoke to,

00:02:13 --> 00:02:14

including the students,

00:02:15 --> 00:02:17

they said, no. We didn't vote, actually.

00:02:17 --> 00:02:19

Neither for Jhepe,

00:02:19 --> 00:02:22

the winning party in this in most of

00:02:22 --> 00:02:23

the cities, actually,

00:02:24 --> 00:02:25

in this community.

00:02:26 --> 00:02:28

Yeah. Okay. Local elections,

00:02:29 --> 00:02:31

and, we didn't vote. I said,

00:02:32 --> 00:02:32

Okay.

00:02:35 --> 00:02:36

You didn't vote. Actually,

00:02:37 --> 00:02:38

you voted for who?

00:02:39 --> 00:02:40

Actually, my niece

00:02:41 --> 00:02:44

who is young. She realized this. She said,

00:02:44 --> 00:02:46

yeah. You are right, Anurag.

00:02:46 --> 00:02:48

Those who didn't

00:02:48 --> 00:02:51

many, they didn't vote and they gave a

00:02:51 --> 00:02:53

support us. They want to have voted.

00:02:54 --> 00:02:55

Okay?

00:02:55 --> 00:02:59

That's it. So brothers and sisters, in conclusion,

00:02:59 --> 00:03:01

don't just use

00:03:01 --> 00:03:02

punishing

00:03:03 --> 00:03:05

as the deciding factor

00:03:05 --> 00:03:06

for your,

00:03:07 --> 00:03:08

for your

00:03:08 --> 00:03:09

voting.

00:03:09 --> 00:03:11

If we were to say this,

00:03:11 --> 00:03:13

okay, we need to think of the other

00:03:13 --> 00:03:14

possibilities.

00:03:15 --> 00:03:16

So,

00:03:16 --> 00:03:17

okay,

00:03:17 --> 00:03:20

I agree with let me agree with you.

00:03:21 --> 00:03:24

Then we would be rewarding another party.

00:03:25 --> 00:03:26

Is that true or not?

00:03:27 --> 00:03:28

So we will punish

00:03:28 --> 00:03:31

labor and we will reward other parties

00:03:31 --> 00:03:32

that maybe

00:03:33 --> 00:03:34

if they were empowered,

00:03:34 --> 00:03:36

they will be worse than labor.

00:03:37 --> 00:03:38

And that's why

00:03:39 --> 00:03:41

in the world of elections and democracy,

00:03:42 --> 00:03:45

you need to what? You need in fact

00:03:45 --> 00:03:47

in fact, this is an Islamic principle.

00:03:53 --> 00:03:54

Don't insult the,

00:03:55 --> 00:03:56

gods of the disbelievers.

00:03:57 --> 00:03:59

If they are going to insult as a

00:03:59 --> 00:04:00

retaliation,

00:04:00 --> 00:04:02

if they are going to insult

00:04:03 --> 00:04:06

Allah This means that look at the bigger

00:04:06 --> 00:04:06

picture,

00:04:07 --> 00:04:08

think of the consequences.

00:04:09 --> 00:04:11

The scholars of Fosid Al Firth, they used

00:04:11 --> 00:04:12

to say,

00:04:17 --> 00:04:19

are connected to the outcome of that.

00:04:19 --> 00:04:20

Therefore,

00:04:20 --> 00:04:22

before I think of punishing

00:04:22 --> 00:04:24

labor, am I

00:04:24 --> 00:04:25

rewarding

00:04:26 --> 00:04:27

any other party

00:04:28 --> 00:04:30

that is going to be worse than

00:04:31 --> 00:04:32

labor?

00:04:33 --> 00:04:36

Yeah? Am I going to punish this candidate,

00:04:36 --> 00:04:38

this particular candidate,

00:04:38 --> 00:04:42

and reward another candidate? And don't say that

00:04:42 --> 00:04:45

we will abstain from voting, or we will

00:04:45 --> 00:04:46

vote for independent,

00:04:47 --> 00:04:49

okay, or some of our, you know,

00:04:50 --> 00:04:50

independent,

00:04:51 --> 00:04:52

candidates

00:04:52 --> 00:04:53

because

00:04:54 --> 00:04:56

that in of itself, if it is not

00:04:56 --> 00:04:56

done

00:04:57 --> 00:04:58

based on statistics

00:04:59 --> 00:05:01

and and facts as much as we can,

00:05:01 --> 00:05:04

then that is considered to be what?

00:05:04 --> 00:05:05

Rewarding

00:05:05 --> 00:05:06

another

00:05:06 --> 00:05:08

party that is

00:05:08 --> 00:05:09

worse than labor.

00:05:10 --> 00:05:10

Yeah?

00:05:11 --> 00:05:13

So I would like to add, if you

00:05:13 --> 00:05:15

allow me, I would like to add for

00:05:15 --> 00:05:18

this statement that you used, which is don't

00:05:18 --> 00:05:19

we want to punish

00:05:20 --> 00:05:21

labor. We want to send them a strong

00:05:21 --> 00:05:24

message. Let us add to it. Okay. Punish

00:05:24 --> 00:05:25

labor,

00:05:25 --> 00:05:26

but

00:05:26 --> 00:05:27

don't reward

00:05:28 --> 00:05:30

those who are worse than labor.

00:05:31 --> 00:05:32

Yeah?

00:05:32 --> 00:05:35

This is the key point. Now in terms

00:05:35 --> 00:05:36

of the mayoral

00:05:36 --> 00:05:37

election,

00:05:40 --> 00:05:42

do we have other options other than,

00:05:43 --> 00:05:45

forget about the labor. Do we have other

00:05:45 --> 00:05:47

options other than Saiedel Khan?

00:05:48 --> 00:05:50

Yeah? Other viable

00:05:51 --> 00:05:51

options?

00:05:53 --> 00:05:54

Do we have that?

00:05:54 --> 00:05:58

Okay. And brothers and sisters, in, again, in

00:05:58 --> 00:05:58

politics

00:05:59 --> 00:06:00

and in the the democratic,

00:06:01 --> 00:06:02

process,

00:06:02 --> 00:06:04

You don't evaluate

00:06:04 --> 00:06:05

a person

00:06:06 --> 00:06:07

based on his statements,

00:06:08 --> 00:06:08

his,

00:06:09 --> 00:06:10

maybe tactics,

00:06:10 --> 00:06:11

etcetera.

00:06:11 --> 00:06:15

No. You, number 1, you evaluate

00:06:16 --> 00:06:17

the party or the individual

00:06:18 --> 00:06:19

based on

00:06:20 --> 00:06:21

his strategy,

00:06:21 --> 00:06:22

not tactics,

00:06:22 --> 00:06:24

and there is a difference between tactics

00:06:25 --> 00:06:25

and

00:06:26 --> 00:06:26

strategy.

00:06:27 --> 00:06:28

Number 1. And strategy

00:06:29 --> 00:06:31

is decided by his past.

00:06:31 --> 00:06:32

Yeah?

00:06:32 --> 00:06:34

Deciding by his other

00:06:36 --> 00:06:38

achievements, his his failure,

00:06:39 --> 00:06:40

conceptualizing

00:06:40 --> 00:06:41

those achievements,

00:06:42 --> 00:06:42

contextualizing

00:06:43 --> 00:06:44

those failures.

00:06:45 --> 00:06:45

Yeah?

00:06:46 --> 00:06:47

Also studying

00:06:47 --> 00:06:48

his,

00:06:48 --> 00:06:51

his manifesto or his future.

00:06:51 --> 00:06:55

Okay? This is how to evaluate him. Now

00:06:55 --> 00:06:56

also,

00:06:56 --> 00:06:59

when you evaluate him, you need to evaluate

00:06:59 --> 00:07:00

the other candidates.

00:07:00 --> 00:07:02

If they were in the position,

00:07:03 --> 00:07:05

Are they going to do better?

00:07:07 --> 00:07:09

Yeah? Yeah. Okay.

00:07:10 --> 00:07:13

Now are you telling me, doctor Selma, yeah,

00:07:14 --> 00:07:15

that if

00:07:16 --> 00:07:16

the conservative

00:07:18 --> 00:07:19

were in power,

00:07:19 --> 00:07:20

will they

00:07:21 --> 00:07:22

condemn

00:07:23 --> 00:07:24

Israel? Will they condemn,

00:07:25 --> 00:07:25

okay,

00:07:26 --> 00:07:26

the

00:07:27 --> 00:07:28

Zionists?

00:07:30 --> 00:07:31

They'll Will they condemn the

00:07:32 --> 00:07:33

occupation?

00:07:33 --> 00:07:37

No. Absolutely not. Okay. Now some people say,

00:07:37 --> 00:07:39

no, we know you need to go for

00:07:39 --> 00:07:39

independent.

00:07:40 --> 00:07:40

They

00:07:41 --> 00:07:42

can win.

00:07:42 --> 00:07:45

Yeah. If there is a possibility for them

00:07:45 --> 00:07:48

to win, then go for it. Yeah? According

00:07:48 --> 00:07:50

to the parties, yes. By voting for them

00:07:51 --> 00:07:53

just a minute. By voting for them, actually,

00:07:53 --> 00:07:54

you are rewarding

00:07:55 --> 00:07:56

certain parties.

00:07:57 --> 00:07:59

Yeah. It is simple. And by the way,

00:08:00 --> 00:08:01

doctor Salman,

00:08:01 --> 00:08:04

you know, I'm not saying, okay, we need

00:08:04 --> 00:08:04

to,

00:08:05 --> 00:08:08

vote labor. Because for GLA, for example, Greater

00:08:08 --> 00:08:09

London Authority,

00:08:10 --> 00:08:11

don't vote labor.

00:08:12 --> 00:08:14

Yeah? Show them that we are not happy

00:08:14 --> 00:08:17

with them. Don't vote Labour. Yeah. And you

00:08:17 --> 00:08:18

know that,

00:08:18 --> 00:08:21

I'm working with the brothers from the Muslim

00:08:21 --> 00:08:24

vote. Okay? And we never agreed to vote

00:08:24 --> 00:08:25

labor.

00:08:25 --> 00:08:28

Yeah? We said we need to check what

00:08:28 --> 00:08:30

is the best for each

00:08:31 --> 00:08:33

community, for each constituency.

00:08:34 --> 00:08:36

They are not. Okay? Certain things that he

00:08:36 --> 00:08:39

did. They are, of course, on Islamic. We

00:08:39 --> 00:08:41

agree. We know about that. Yeah. But does

00:08:41 --> 00:08:45

that mean that the the his, what, opponent

00:08:45 --> 00:08:47

will do Islamic things?

00:08:47 --> 00:08:49

Do you think that

00:08:49 --> 00:08:51

the conservative or the Turei

00:08:52 --> 00:08:52

candidate

00:08:53 --> 00:08:54

will be,

00:08:55 --> 00:08:57

forget about pro Palestine

00:08:58 --> 00:08:58

issue

00:08:58 --> 00:09:00

or pro administrations,

00:09:01 --> 00:09:01

will be,

00:09:02 --> 00:09:06

will will will will the candidate be just

00:09:06 --> 00:09:07

in terms of

00:09:08 --> 00:09:09

allowing those demonstrations

00:09:10 --> 00:09:11

and protest,

00:09:11 --> 00:09:12

or,

00:09:13 --> 00:09:15

is the candidate going to work

00:09:17 --> 00:09:17

actively

00:09:19 --> 00:09:21

to to to suppress or to stop those

00:09:21 --> 00:09:22

demonstrations.

00:09:23 --> 00:09:25

So this is this is a critical thing

00:09:25 --> 00:09:28

because now London is the hub of those

00:09:28 --> 00:09:29

demonstrations.

00:09:29 --> 00:09:31

And if we are not allowed to,

00:09:32 --> 00:09:36

demonstrate in London, forget about just Palestine issue.

00:09:36 --> 00:09:38

Anything, they this is the key issue. And

00:09:38 --> 00:09:41

that's why even for the non Muslims, they

00:09:41 --> 00:09:44

need to understand this, that once we are

00:09:44 --> 00:09:44

supporting

00:09:44 --> 00:09:45

the ministrations

00:09:45 --> 00:09:49

for Palestine or we are actually supporting the

00:09:49 --> 00:09:49

ministrations

00:09:51 --> 00:09:53

for the people's choice,

00:09:53 --> 00:09:56

which is, as they say, the heart of

00:09:56 --> 00:09:58

the democratic game.

00:09:59 --> 00:10:00

Now, unfortunately,

00:10:01 --> 00:10:02

the the the establishment

00:10:03 --> 00:10:05

or many elements of the establishment,

00:10:06 --> 00:10:08

they don't want any opposition

00:10:09 --> 00:10:11

to their agenda, to their policies.

00:10:12 --> 00:10:13

Yeah. And

00:10:13 --> 00:10:15

they they want to suppress

00:10:16 --> 00:10:16

any,

00:10:17 --> 00:10:17

agenda,

00:10:19 --> 00:10:19

sorry.

00:10:20 --> 00:10:23

Not agenda, any opposition for their agenda.

00:10:23 --> 00:10:26

So that's why we say even to non

00:10:26 --> 00:10:28

Muslims, you need to support us in this

00:10:28 --> 00:10:30

issue because it became

00:10:31 --> 00:10:31

iconic,

00:10:32 --> 00:10:35

You know? It it became an icon for

00:10:35 --> 00:10:37

those who want to,

00:10:38 --> 00:10:39

to demonstrate for their

00:10:40 --> 00:10:40

independent,

00:10:41 --> 00:10:44

a choice for their true freedom, true

00:10:44 --> 00:10:45

freedom,

00:10:45 --> 00:10:49

yeah, for their true choice for the true,

00:10:53 --> 00:10:53

democracy.

Share Page

Related Episodes