The segment discusses misunderstandings and pride in religion, including the confusion surrounding the term "married without the consent of the body" and the difficulty of living within society. The speakers also touch on rumors about a woman and her husband being a coward, the importance of research on wiping over socks, and the importance of knowing the rules of the universe. The speakers emphasize the need to be cautious when dealing with similar opinions and avoiding harm, and stress the importance of differentiation in addressing issues of confusion and misunderstandings. The segment also touches on the use of heroin in Saudi Arabia and the potential consequences of the use of leather and leather as clothing.
00:00:13 -->
00:00:16
salatu salam, ala l mursaleen. Amina Mohammed
00:00:20 -->
00:00:22
Salam aleikum wa rahmatullah volcat.
00:00:26 -->
00:00:29
Today, inshallah Tada, we will
00:00:31 -->
00:00:36
pause a little bit. And we will be speaking about a subject.
00:00:38 -->
00:00:42
A few brothers yesterday, triggered that subject.
00:00:44 -->
00:00:46
Before inshallah we carry on
00:00:47 -->
00:00:53
the doors, I was sitting with a group of brothers yesterday, who are collaborating.
00:00:55 -->
00:00:55
And
00:00:59 -->
00:01:07
they said that there is a real problem among so many collaboration, and among so many practicing
people
00:01:08 -->
00:01:13
these days, which is related to how to deal with
00:01:14 -->
00:01:17
matters of differences.
00:01:18 -->
00:01:19
And
00:01:20 -->
00:01:26
they were talking about one of the individuals who have certain views
00:01:27 -->
00:01:28
about
00:01:30 -->
00:01:34
some Islamic issues, and they say that
00:01:35 -->
00:01:36
some people
00:01:38 -->
00:01:46
because of his views, they believe that he committed an act of Kufa and he became Catholic.
00:01:47 -->
00:01:49
And as a result of that,
00:01:50 -->
00:01:58
everyone who is not denouncing him as a Catholic, he is becoming Catholic as well.
00:01:59 -->
00:02:18
And anyone who is associated to him, or not clearly or openly denouncing him as a Catholic, then he
becomes Catholic as well, because it is a well established principle in Sharia that the one who does
not
00:02:19 -->
00:02:29
make fear of the Catholic, he is a Catholic as well. The one who doesn't denounce Wko, four, for the
Kaffir, he is a Catholic himself.
00:02:30 -->
00:02:31
And
00:02:32 -->
00:02:54
they said that there is a huge or a big misunderstanding among so many young brothers about this
issue. And they were the brothers were blaming, yeah, I need the the people of knowledge, the
students of knowledge, that God that they are not clarify this point,
00:02:56 -->
00:02:59
in a way that removes any kind of doubt or
00:03:01 -->
00:03:06
removed remove any kind of myths. Understanding
00:03:10 -->
00:03:18
this issue, I'm not talking about tech fear, but I'm talking about a critical issue maybe we have
not mentioned it
00:03:19 -->
00:03:29
clearly before in one of our gurus, and I found it important to speak about it. And it is from a
perspective called Allah was him
00:03:30 -->
00:03:33
and there wasn't, this implies this
00:03:34 -->
00:03:35
and hence,
00:03:37 -->
00:03:54
allows him means a implies B, B implies C, C implies D. So therefore, a implies C and D, okay, is a
logical deduction. What does that mean?
00:03:56 -->
00:04:04
Let us take another example, which is maybe an easier example. And I believe that this is really a
very important subject.
00:04:07 -->
00:04:16
Let us believe that someone doesn't believe that a person can can make wiping over the socks.
00:04:18 -->
00:04:22
Someone doesn't believe that wiping over the socks is allowed.
00:04:23 -->
00:04:24
And therefore,
00:04:25 -->
00:04:29
the one who believes that wiping over the socks is not allowed.
00:04:30 -->
00:04:33
He believes that the Salah will be invalid.
00:04:35 -->
00:04:36
And therefore,
00:04:37 -->
00:04:39
listen to this therefore,
00:04:40 -->
00:04:42
if a person his Salah is invalid
00:04:44 -->
00:04:53
and all of his Salawat or most of his Salawat are invalid. He is according to an opinion, which is
the strongest opinion
00:04:54 -->
00:04:57
he came out of the fold of Islam
00:04:59 -->
00:04:59
Okay,
00:05:01 -->
00:05:02
And
00:05:03 -->
00:05:17
for sure that he has been like this doing his Salah for a long period of time and he was not an
ignorant person. So, for sure this person he is committing COVID and because he's not
00:05:18 -->
00:05:21
an ignorant person he is Catholic.
00:05:23 -->
00:05:28
Now, we have reached to this conclusion that he is cafard because of what
00:05:35 -->
00:05:38
because of Mashallah because of masala
00:05:41 -->
00:05:42
on the socks,
00:05:43 -->
00:05:51
you've got it how dangerous is that or that is he became cafard because of what
00:05:54 -->
00:06:18
because of why I think over the sauce, this kind of misunderstanding is a very male male is a very
problematic and is a very dangerous misunderstanding because of this lower than he is doing this and
therefore, that is the consequence and then we take it one step further and that is the consequence
and so on so forth.
00:06:20 -->
00:06:21
Another example
00:06:23 -->
00:06:23
a person
00:06:24 -->
00:06:36
got married without the permission of the body. At that time, for example, he believes that marriage
without the consent of the body is okay. So, he has done that the lady has done that
00:06:38 -->
00:06:39
after some time
00:06:41 -->
00:07:01
he was doing some study and research and he found that was not an invalid that was that was not a
valid opinion okay to marry without the consent of the body.
00:07:02 -->
00:07:09
And therefore, he had some children, the children were produced
00:07:10 -->
00:07:13
Okay, during an invalid marriage
00:07:14 -->
00:07:15
and therefore,
00:07:16 -->
00:07:19
they cannot take the lineage of their father
00:07:20 -->
00:07:28
and therefore, how do we judge him we judge them that as if they are like the children of Xena
00:07:30 -->
00:07:35
Okay, we do have them as if they are children of Xena.
00:07:37 -->
00:07:38
Another example
00:07:41 -->
00:07:43
you know that
00:07:45 -->
00:07:50
practicing this drafter Salah in congregation
00:07:53 -->
00:07:54
many people are doing it
00:07:55 -->
00:07:57
Some people believe that it is better
00:07:58 -->
00:08:04
and therefore the person who is doing it he is what mocked it.
00:08:05 -->
00:08:06
Yeah.
00:08:07 -->
00:08:16
And it has been stated by so many scholars in the past that the beta is worse than a kaviraj
00:08:18 -->
00:08:19
is worse than a major sin.
00:08:21 -->
00:08:29
And therefore those people who pray and make drought there are they are worse than the fornicators
00:08:31 -->
00:08:32
because they are moved to the rain.
00:08:35 -->
00:08:46
Okay. And moreover, it has been stated by Sofia and many others, that even you don't give them Salah
because they are destroying the deen from within
00:08:49 -->
00:08:50
this phenomena
00:08:51 -->
00:08:56
occurred some time ago in some Arab countries.
00:08:58 -->
00:08:59
And they started to believe
00:09:01 -->
00:09:09
is a very dangerous phenomena. They started to believe that the leader of that Muslim country is a
Catholic
00:09:11 -->
00:09:16
and the people who are working under that government.
00:09:17 -->
00:09:17
Yeah.
00:09:18 -->
00:09:26
Because they are accepting the authority of a cancer over them. Then they are kofa
00:09:28 -->
00:09:30
and normal people
00:09:32 -->
00:09:35
because they do not denounce the government
00:09:36 -->
00:09:40
and they do not denounce them as Kufa openly.
00:09:41 -->
00:09:43
They are Cofer as well.
00:09:45 -->
00:10:00
And the amounts who are appointed by was elected out of the Ministry of religion or religious
affairs, okay, because that was out or that ministry is part of the government.
00:10:00 -->
00:10:18
Which is a careful government. So, therefore, there was zero the minister is a Catholic and anyone
who accepts his authority is a Catholic and any amount who is appointed by that minister who is a
Catholic is also adapted
00:10:22 -->
00:10:24
is all capital times capital.
00:10:26 -->
00:10:33
No, seriously, that happened. It started in Egypt in
00:10:35 -->
00:10:43
early 70s, late 60s, okay, early 70s they used to be known as Jama athletic field wall hedgerow.
00:10:45 -->
00:10:59
And after some time, they said, but how can we live within this society, we cannot pray behind the
mounts who are kofod because they were appointed by the
00:11:00 -->
00:11:12
cabinet by the government, which is a Catholic government. So, what to do, so, they isolated
themselves from the whole society and they started to establish their own massage
00:11:14 -->
00:11:16
and their own prayer halls.
00:11:17 -->
00:11:42
And, but they need to get married, they need to deal with other people they need to eat that they
had they need to eat any the meat is locked up by other people, they stopped you from eating that
because it is a slaughtered, the the meat is watered, okay, most likely by kofod. So it is not
allowed to eat from it
00:11:44 -->
00:11:48
getting married, we cannot get married to a daughter or family.
00:11:49 -->
00:12:22
Because it is likely that he is mortal as well. Okay, she stated as well. And so on so forth, they
found that it is very difficult for them to live within the society, not just only to pray behind
the demands, but we live within the society. So some of them they started to do empty hand. empty
hand means testing people before going to a friend or before eating from any meat, they will ask the
person
00:12:24 -->
00:12:41
who is slaughtering these kind of sheeps or castles? Do you make the fear of the government? If he
says yes, then there it is, okay, meat, the meat is slaughtered by him. If he says no, then they
don't eat.
00:12:42 -->
00:13:00
And for marriage, they used to go to the Father or some of them. Of course, this is an extremely new
version of them. And they used to go to the Father, and they used to question him, Do you believe in
this? Do you believe in that? If he says
00:13:01 -->
00:13:10
no, I don't believe that the government is a Catholic government, then he is a cafard. Okay, and
therefore, they don't get married to his daughter.
00:13:12 -->
00:13:22
Now, you might see that this is this looks very funny. And this looks very strange, and no one would
accept this kind of thinking.
00:13:24 -->
00:13:24
Agree.
00:13:27 -->
00:13:41
It looks now like this, but many people, many young, many young brothers fell into this problem at
that time. And we normally see some people in some countries who are holding this kind of
00:13:43 -->
00:13:44
process of thinking
00:13:46 -->
00:13:51
this is the most dangerous thing is the the thought process rather than the conclusion.
00:13:53 -->
00:13:53
And
00:13:55 -->
00:13:58
we were talking about this, as I told you yesterday,
00:13:59 -->
00:14:04
and they said that, if that particular individual
00:14:05 -->
00:14:19
is uttering these statements, then for sure he is a Catholic, and the one who keeps quiet and he
does not denounce confer upon Him then He is a coward for sure. And just it drags on and on.
00:14:21 -->
00:14:23
And a very extreme
00:14:25 -->
00:14:26
level of that
00:14:27 -->
00:14:32
is what happened in some countries, some Arab countries.
00:14:34 -->
00:14:45
Actually, there were rumors that it happened, Allahu Allah, whether it happened or not, so don't
quote me. They started to believe that the whole society is too far.
00:14:47 -->
00:14:59
Okay, but it is allowed to fight against kofod because these are more 13. So you can you should
fight against them. This is the health disability law
00:15:00 -->
00:15:03
Not only that, but they're women
00:15:05 -->
00:15:08
they have to be taken as coupon
00:15:11 -->
00:15:12
coupons, okay,
00:15:14 -->
00:15:15
as the right hand process
00:15:17 -->
00:15:24
and they have taken the Muslim woman like this and that has happened
00:15:25 -->
00:15:29
don't say that this is just an imagination No, it has happened.
00:15:31 -->
00:15:35
Why? Because there is a problem in the way people are thinking
00:15:36 -->
00:15:55
young people are thinking that's why we normally say that the way we think the way we develop our
ideas, the way we extract rulings from the ideal or the way we perceive a dealer
00:15:56 -->
00:16:08
is more important than that a dealer themselves then the product of the that process, the end
product of that process.
00:16:14 -->
00:16:20
Now, let us go to the first example, which is what a person became cafard because of what
00:16:22 -->
00:16:29
because of wiping over none of the socks. The letter the non leather of
00:16:32 -->
00:16:34
what was the mistake?
00:16:38 -->
00:16:39
What is the mistake?
00:16:57 -->
00:16:59
Is the mistake they
00:17:02 -->
00:17:04
the person thought that
00:17:06 -->
00:17:06
was
00:17:18 -->
00:17:18
for else
00:17:21 -->
00:17:22
wanted to say?
00:17:24 -->
00:17:25
Yes.
00:17:27 -->
00:17:29
making assumptions for the next
00:17:35 -->
00:17:36
time they expected.
00:17:41 -->
00:17:41
Okay.
00:17:42 -->
00:17:45
Anyone? Both haha.
00:17:50 -->
00:17:56
Okay. Yanni we want to do as they say the crux of the issue. Haha.
00:18:03 -->
00:18:05
Excellent. Yeah, that's
00:18:06 -->
00:18:16
okay. All of you. Any you mentioned it, but that is in a very brief way. They judge others according
to their own.
00:18:17 -->
00:18:19
What? beneath?
00:18:21 -->
00:18:30
They judged others, okay, according to their own belief. And that is a very big mistake.
00:18:32 -->
00:18:37
Yeah, a very big mistake. When you come up with a conclusion
00:18:38 -->
00:18:57
about anything in Sharia. Don't judge others according to your conclusion. First of all, you have to
study the issue. And you have to see whether there are other opinions in this matter or not.
00:18:59 -->
00:18:59
Yeah,
00:19:00 -->
00:19:13
and that's why we always in our study, and that's why I was a little bit worried to be honest with
you. We always in our study, it try to mention that there is another opinion
00:19:15 -->
00:19:15
okay.
00:19:17 -->
00:19:27
There is another opinion and sometimes we say that the other opinion is strong enough and the issue
is flexible.
00:19:28 -->
00:19:32
But even we if we strongly
00:19:33 -->
00:19:35
hold another opinion,
00:19:36 -->
00:19:51
a certain opinion, we should admit that there is another opinion differently from our opinion and
that opinion is held by scholars,
00:19:52 -->
00:19:59
by renowned scholars, by credible scholars and therefore the
00:20:00 -->
00:20:11
Those who believe on the other, in the other opinion should not be judged according to our criteria,
they should be judged according to their criteria.
00:20:14 -->
00:20:16
Failing to do so,
00:20:19 -->
00:20:21
the oma will be divided into
00:20:23 -->
00:20:27
divisions more than even the individuals themselves.
00:20:29 -->
00:20:43
Because the individual himself or the individual herself, will, at a certain point, hold an opinion.
After some time, we'll change the opinion. Is that true or not?
00:20:44 -->
00:21:01
Now, today, for example, I believe that wiping over the socks is allowed. Maybe after two days, I do
a little bit research, maybe I become convinced that no wiping over the any socks is not allowed.
00:21:02 -->
00:21:10
So how do I look to myself when I was wiping over the socks? Do I have to compensate my Salah
00:21:12 -->
00:21:12
at that time
00:21:14 -->
00:21:17
that I prayed at that time, is the matter clear.
00:21:18 -->
00:21:23
So don't judge others according to your opinion.
00:21:24 -->
00:21:27
I mentioned to the brothers a very important
00:21:29 -->
00:21:37
rule. I mentioned this as a very important rule. And I gave some examples that the scholars
themselves mentioned
00:21:39 -->
00:21:46
one of the examples is the example given by the humblest colors, the humblest colors they believe
that
00:21:48 -->
00:21:50
eating from a camel
00:21:52 -->
00:21:55
flesh breaks the flesh of the common breaks
00:21:56 -->
00:22:01
and this is one of the particulars of madhhab Alhamdulillah masala data
00:22:03 -->
00:22:11
they said and the moment he mentioned something like this if the Imam is a humbling
00:22:12 -->
00:22:12
and
00:22:14 -->
00:22:19
he is followed by two people one of them is a humble and one of them is a Hanafi
00:22:20 -->
00:22:25
and the Eman eight from the camel
00:22:26 -->
00:22:29
Yeah, camel flesh and he went to prayer without
00:22:32 -->
00:22:33
the humbly
00:22:35 -->
00:22:37
he witnessed this and the Hanafi witness this
00:22:39 -->
00:22:42
for the humbly the Salah of the event is not valid
00:22:44 -->
00:22:46
for the Hanafi the Salah for the amount is what
00:22:49 -->
00:22:50
for the Hanafi
00:22:53 -->
00:22:57
the Salah for the Imam for the Hanafi by is valid.
00:22:58 -->
00:23:04
Okay, he doesn't believe that this breaks that will do.
00:23:06 -->
00:23:08
Okay, he doesn't believe that this breaks the window.
00:23:09 -->
00:23:54
So he saw that in Miami, doesn't he? For him, it doesn't break the window, he doesn't know that this
is a hamburger, ma'am. Okay, it does break the elbow or it doesn't Okay, it breaks the elbow for
him. So, therefore, therefore, he should not judge outside this and for him the Salah is valid, but
the one who knows that enam is a humbling and is following that opinion and he ate the from that
flesh and he never had to do after that. Okay, and they still they prayed behind him and they they
hold the same opinion.
00:23:55 -->
00:23:57
Then for them the Salah is invalid.
00:24:00 -->
00:24:04
Take the example. Okay, of wiping over the socks.
00:24:06 -->
00:24:08
This is a very clear example.
00:24:09 -->
00:24:25
Many people who doesn't many people who do not believe that wiping over the socks is allowed. If
they saw an enemy wiping over his socks, they don't pray behind him. They believe that what is Salah
is what
00:24:27 -->
00:24:29
is invalid. Why?
00:24:32 -->
00:24:44
Because according to them, wiping over the socks is not allowed and therefore this Imam his Salah is
invalid and therefore they cannot pray behind him.
00:24:45 -->
00:24:53
Now there is a difference between the first example and the second example we will come to that
difference. Okay in a minute. But is it clear?
00:24:54 -->
00:24:59
What is what went wrong is that they jumped him
00:25:00 -->
00:25:02
According to their criteria
00:25:04 -->
00:25:09
Anima Malik, so he was asked, do you pray behind the person who
00:25:10 -->
00:25:15
bleed, okay? Who bleeds and doesn't make although
00:25:16 -->
00:25:22
he said, Don't you want me to pray behind people? Like, say who say you?
00:25:25 -->
00:25:35
Don't you? You want me to pray behind, like Satan and say, What does that mean? He believes that
believing what
00:25:36 -->
00:25:37
breakthrough
00:25:38 -->
00:25:43
but if a man doesn't believe that bleeding breaks the window
00:25:44 -->
00:25:51
then I have to tolerate that opinion and I have to judge him according to his opinion.
00:25:52 -->
00:26:06
Actually, many scholars say if there is a case of difference of opinion, even you can tolerate it
for yourself as well even if you believe that the Imam
00:26:07 -->
00:26:12
the Imam Salah is invalid like the story of what
00:26:14 -->
00:26:16
eating from the
00:26:17 -->
00:26:18
camel need
00:26:20 -->
00:26:21
the mm
00:26:22 -->
00:26:26
hmm he is eating the from that, for him,
00:26:27 -->
00:26:34
the Salah is invalid for the somebody who prays behind him, the Salah is invalid, but for the Hanafi
00:26:35 -->
00:26:39
him his Salah is valid. Now,
00:26:40 -->
00:26:57
there are two possibilities either we judge the amount according to his own belief or we judge the
amount according to my belief, they said in some cases you judge the other according to the best of
both opinions.
00:26:59 -->
00:26:59
Did you get this?
00:27:01 -->
00:27:34
So, it is true that according to his opinion his Salah is invalid according to my opinion the Salah
is valid, but judgment according to my opinion is what is better is safer in this issue, which is a
matter of differences and therefore I should receive that his Salah I should receive Forget about
him I should perceive that his Salah is valid and therefore my Salah behind him is valid.
00:27:35 -->
00:27:42
Did you get the last point this is called morato killer by him okay we'll have some sorry
00:27:46 -->
00:27:46
because
00:27:47 -->
00:27:53
considering his Salah is invalid is something that is any
00:27:54 -->
00:27:57
any entails that he doesn't pray
00:28:00 -->
00:28:22
for him maybe his Salah is invalid for him, but for me, because there is a valid opinion that this
person his Salah might be valid although he has done that there is a valid opinion and I hold that
opinion okay and it is safer for me then let me go for that.
00:28:23 -->
00:28:26
Okay, let me give another example. similar to this.
00:28:30 -->
00:28:36
It happened one time that I was invited to give a lecture in another city.
00:28:39 -->
00:28:57
And then the the brothers they invited me to give the hotbar Juma some of the brothers there they
follow a certain mother a little bit district and they said but if the any speaker comes and let the
Salah he is what
00:28:58 -->
00:28:59
he is what
00:29:01 -->
00:29:01
massage,
00:29:02 -->
00:29:09
he is massage, the massage it doesn't establish Juma according to their opinion,
00:29:10 -->
00:29:12
but man it is a valid opinion that the massage doesn't
00:29:14 -->
00:29:15
establish demand.
00:29:17 -->
00:29:33
The one who is a massage doesn't establish Juma there are some technicalities but it is a valid
opinion. It doesn't mean that he is held on to pray your mouth. This is one mistake. It is not
doesn't mean that is how long to pray Duma but he doesn't pray Juma
00:29:35 -->
00:29:42
and they said he cannot lead us because what we believe that his Salah is what
00:29:43 -->
00:29:47
is invalid and he believes that he is himself.
00:29:50 -->
00:29:52
Did you get this yar Shabaab
00:29:54 -->
00:29:55
Are you following the discussion?
00:29:57 -->
00:30:00
Are you following the discussion? Okay.
00:30:01 -->
00:30:30
In this case, what can we do? So, they asked some of our elders and some of our elders hamdulillah
they have knowledge and they said no, if he is praying according to a valid opinion, we should go
for that valid opinion although whether he believes otherwise whether we believe otherwise as far as
he is playing according to a valid opinion, we should go for that
00:30:31 -->
00:30:36
is it clear and especially in things related to that
00:30:38 -->
00:30:40
especially, okay
00:30:42 -->
00:31:00
and things related to rebar that So, if he is doing it according to a valid opinion and it is not
okay because it is about is not causing harm For me it is not causing harm for others. So, we should
not kill her, Allah Asante, La Jolla and we should
00:31:03 -->
00:31:04
we should
00:31:05 -->
00:31:06
take it
00:31:08 -->
00:31:27
at the best position, okay? So, the best position is the Salah is valid, and therefore, our Salah is
valid as well. Okay, the worst scenario is to say that his Salah is invalid, and therefore our Salah
behind him is invalid, and that is the worst scenario.
00:31:29 -->
00:31:34
The point is, as we said, You have judged him
00:31:36 -->
00:31:43
according to your own, what opinion that is the biggest mistake.
00:31:44 -->
00:31:45
And then
00:31:46 -->
00:31:50
it comes the other mistake, which is a bigger mistake,
00:31:51 -->
00:32:00
which you build everything according to that which is a matter of differences.
00:32:01 -->
00:32:13
So you concluded that his Salah is invalid and he has been praying like this for 10 years. So for
seven years, actually he didn't pray
00:32:17 -->
00:32:24
for 10 years, as if he did not pray at all because an invalid Salah
00:32:25 -->
00:32:26
is not Salah
00:32:27 -->
00:33:04
Is that true and invalid Salah is not solid, so it's worthless. And because it is worthless, it has
no value and has for 10 years he has not great for 10 years he has not prayed his Salah he actually
captured and if he is captured, then maybe his cohabitation with his wife is helaman this the
children like the children of Xena and maybe later on we can have the hand against them and we can
take their wives as the right hand possess etc, etc. Is it clear?
00:33:06 -->
00:33:09
Yeah. Similarly with the issue of Buddha
00:33:10 -->
00:33:11
with the issue of Buddha.
00:33:13 -->
00:33:18
Now, some people raise their hands after salah
00:33:20 -->
00:33:20
and they make dua
00:33:22 -->
00:33:25
they believe that they are doing it following the sinner.
00:33:27 -->
00:33:28
Is that true or not?
00:33:29 -->
00:33:32
They have their own scholars who taught them this.
00:33:33 -->
00:33:42
And they put trust in their scholars, the ahaadeeth that are hardy might be understood in their
favor.
00:33:43 -->
00:33:47
You remember Hadith who Mara Yama
00:33:48 -->
00:33:52
letter Donna kilesa Deborah kilda Salah antipolo llama Neolithic Erica.
00:33:53 -->
00:33:56
Neva chick lotta Hannah
00:33:57 -->
00:34:06
and Taku duper akula sala de Baraka Salah means at the end of each salah and we said if you remember
we said what
00:34:07 -->
00:34:25
end of Salah is it before that asleep or after the sleep? Do you remember? So it might be understood
that it is after the test live and there are other Adela that the congregation elder is not really a
big problem.
00:34:26 -->
00:34:32
And they put this with this and they believe that they are doing something good which is
00:34:34 -->
00:34:34
and
00:34:35 -->
00:34:36
they can do it.
00:34:37 -->
00:34:40
Now some people believe that it is with us.
00:34:42 -->
00:34:59
Okay, and therefore the one who is doing it is a mock today and the mock today is worse than that.
committing the person who is committing a caveat I'm gonna cover one of the major sins and we don't
give them salame we don't even okay help them. We don't ask
00:35:00 -->
00:35:02
Are you with them? Etc, etc.
00:35:06 -->
00:35:08
You remember maybe
00:35:09 -->
00:35:16
when the American troops were bombing our brothers in Afghanistan
00:35:17 -->
00:35:17
okay.
00:35:20 -->
00:35:31
Some people were celebrating some Muslims were celebrating because what they said Allah Allah Allah
is destroying Diwali mean by barley mean.
00:35:33 -->
00:35:53
Yeah is destroying oppressors by oppresses wrongdoers by wrongdoers. So these are Mauritania in
Afghanistan, and the Americans are Kufa so far against malaria and those mortality are sometimes
worse than those who commit major sins.
00:35:54 -->
00:36:00
And we are happy now because Allah Allah, Allah accepted our app that he is
00:36:01 -->
00:36:09
destroying any one party with the other party, it is a big problem in terms of thinking
00:36:10 -->
00:36:11
a major problem
00:36:12 -->
00:36:18
okay. Then, the other point related to this
00:36:19 -->
00:36:19
is
00:36:21 -->
00:36:26
that as an individual, it is a very important principle.
00:36:30 -->
00:36:36
There is a difference between the one who is doing gabbatha
00:36:37 -->
00:36:39
and the one who produced the Buddha.
00:36:42 -->
00:36:43
Is it clear?
00:36:45 -->
00:36:47
The one who invented the Buddha
00:36:48 -->
00:36:51
is different from the one who what,
00:36:52 -->
00:36:54
who is acting upon it.
00:36:57 -->
00:36:58
Can you see the difference?
00:37:03 -->
00:37:04
Can someone tell me
00:37:07 -->
00:37:08
about the difference?
00:37:09 -->
00:37:16
What is the difference between the person acting upon a beta and the person who is what?
00:37:19 -->
00:37:21
producing the beta inventing it?
00:37:24 -->
00:37:25
Yes, yeah, my
00:37:27 -->
00:37:29
producer. He knows that
00:37:36 -->
00:37:37
brings it in.
00:37:39 -->
00:37:41
For the people who follow it.
00:37:50 -->
00:38:22
Exactly. Exactly. The one who is producing it, he is the one who is trying to compete with the
chowder with a lot delivered. Because he is saying, as if he is saying, Allah is legislating for us,
and I am legislating that's why this kind of person, he is worse than what those who are committing
major sins, but the one
00:38:23 -->
00:38:24
the one who believes
00:38:27 -->
00:38:29
that there are certain scholars
00:38:31 -->
00:38:32
with credibility
00:38:33 -->
00:38:35
and they have knowledge etc.
00:38:36 -->
00:38:53
And he is just following them. He is not introducing inventing producing something new, this person
is excused. Actually, he when he does something as it is sooner,
00:38:54 -->
00:38:56
he will be rewarded.
00:38:57 -->
00:38:57
agree or not
00:38:59 -->
00:39:16
agree or not. And therefore, once we deal with him, we deal with him that he is something he is
someone who is trying his best. And he is trying to get a reward from Allah, Allah Allah and he's
trying to act upon this nap.
00:39:19 -->
00:39:21
Is it clear? Yes.
00:39:27 -->
00:39:29
For both Yeah.
00:39:30 -->
00:39:30
Yeah.
00:39:34 -->
00:39:40
The question is, is he going to be rewarded for his intention or for the action
00:39:42 -->
00:39:45
and we said and these matters
00:39:46 -->
00:39:48
that are not very clear.
00:39:50 -->
00:39:52
He will be rewarded for both
00:39:53 -->
00:39:55
any more than Vitamina
00:39:56 -->
00:39:59
okay. For example,
00:40:00 -->
00:40:04
Making this congregational after Salah
00:40:05 -->
00:40:42
making congregational after Salah. This as we said, there is a possibility that it is sadhana
although it is a weak opinion, but for this person he believes that it is now because many of his
scholars said that and they used to do that and even some classical scholars, this is the point,
many classical scholars said that it is similar. So, they will be rewarded for the intention and the
action itself okay. But if the matter is
00:40:44 -->
00:40:44
clear
00:40:47 -->
00:40:56
and the person is ignorant, he will be rewarded for the intention only in that case, not for the
action.
00:41:00 -->
00:41:09
As we say at the end of the day, this is an all lies with a light yellow Allah, Allah, Allah, Allah,
He is the one to reward people.
00:41:11 -->
00:41:14
But that differentiation is important.
00:41:15 -->
00:41:24
Even taymiyah Rahim Allah once he was walking, and some people came, and they were about to beat
him. We mentioned this story before.
00:41:26 -->
00:41:41
They were about to beat him. And then his students came, they protected him. And he went with them.
And they said, his students said, we want to go and beat them up. He said, No, no, no, don't go.
00:41:42 -->
00:41:42
Why?
00:41:44 -->
00:41:46
He said there might be rewarded,
00:41:48 -->
00:41:52
because they were thinking that they are defending Islam by doing that.
00:41:55 -->
00:41:57
Did you get this? Yeah, brothers.
00:41:59 -->
00:42:11
He said don't do that. Why? Because they believe that they are defending Islam by doing that.
Imagine this level of justice, level of justice that you
00:42:14 -->
00:42:14
had.
00:42:16 -->
00:42:26
And in conclusion, brothers and sisters, we have to be careful when we deal with issues that
00:42:29 -->
00:42:30
matters of differences.
00:42:31 -->
00:42:32
One thing
00:42:33 -->
00:42:35
and the other thing is,
00:42:36 -->
00:42:39
if there is ignorance
00:42:40 -->
00:42:41
among people
00:42:43 -->
00:42:50
and they don't know the third thing, we should differentiate between the level of
00:42:51 -->
00:42:51
beta
00:42:53 -->
00:42:56
or the level of mistake.
00:42:58 -->
00:43:03
Yeah, the level of mistake mattered that is possible.
00:43:04 -->
00:43:11
And there are two strong opinions is different from a matter that is what clear cut.
00:43:12 -->
00:43:13
Yeah.
00:43:16 -->
00:43:19
So you need to
00:43:20 -->
00:43:23
disseminate this understanding
00:43:24 -->
00:43:34
to other brothers, in order to try to limit this problem, this phenomena to limit it as much as we
can.
00:43:35 -->
00:43:38
If we don't do that, then
00:43:40 -->
00:44:02
there might be a time word we all regret, because those young people they might develop their own
ideas, and they might come up with conclusions similar to the conclusions that we have mentioned.
They might believe that all Muslims around them are Kufa
00:44:03 -->
00:44:06
we have to be very, very careful.
00:44:07 -->
00:44:08
And
00:44:09 -->
00:44:11
as I say to the brothers,
00:44:12 -->
00:44:19
whenever someone says just remember this statement, they say that this is without
00:44:21 -->
00:44:30
and it is not a clear cut means not all scholars agreed upon it. Just respond by saying that this in
your view is better.
00:44:33 -->
00:44:36
Remember, the statement in your view is better.
00:44:38 -->
00:44:45
If someone said this is this one, again, say in your view it is this.
00:44:47 -->
00:44:51
Okay? Don't judge me according to your view.
00:44:53 -->
00:44:59
So these are the two statements in viewer view, which is better in your view it is and the second
00:45:00 -->
00:45:04
Part of the statement is don't judge me according to you.
00:45:07 -->
00:45:10
I hope that the matter is clear and there's a common law
00:45:12 -->
00:45:14
Okay, if you have questions yes.
00:45:15 -->
00:45:23
If the sisters have questions please send them okay quickly and inshallah we will deal with them
either today or
00:45:25 -->
00:45:26
next week inshallah
00:45:27 -->
00:45:28
Yes.
00:45:37 -->
00:45:39
Yeah, provided that okay.
00:45:41 -->
00:45:50
You that doesn't lead to as well as any the worst of both opinions.
00:45:55 -->
00:45:57
doesn't bring the camera
00:45:59 -->
00:46:02
he can't say that according to your Yeah, it breaks
00:46:06 -->
00:46:08
this is called Morocco killer.
00:46:12 -->
00:46:25
Theoretically this could lead to no including the good nor evil every person would have an excuse to
follow what he trusts. Could it lead to for example, a person being excused
00:46:26 -->
00:46:26
because he
00:46:27 -->
00:46:31
Yeah, there will be no incentive to find the truth. Okay.
00:46:32 -->
00:46:42
Babe, the question is if someone said that this leads to leaving on joining the good and forbidding
the evil
00:46:44 -->
00:46:47
Yeah, this is a very valid point. But
00:46:48 -->
00:46:52
here the scholars have a clear guide
00:46:53 -->
00:46:56
which is the Iron Curtain mattala foofy
00:46:57 -->
00:46:58
mahali
00:46:59 -->
00:47:39
don't forbid someone if doing from doing something okay, which is a matter of differences just
enjoying the good that all agree on. And for big that even that all agony as if and that's why Sofia
can ignore hnsa. So piano theory said either either by Julia Malou Alam Allah Allah tala de Sala Del
Mar who will attend if you see a person doing something, which is a matter of opinions, don't Okay,
stop him and don't
00:47:41 -->
00:47:41
command
00:47:43 -->
00:47:44
is it clear?
00:47:46 -->
00:47:48
Is it clear matters of differences.
00:47:49 -->
00:47:57
But these colors differentiate between two types of differences. Silicone shad
00:48:00 -->
00:48:17
California wahida formattable silicone shell means a person is holding an old opinion and up normal
opinion this we don't need to read that or opinion as a matter of differences. Is it clear?
00:48:18 -->
00:48:18
But
00:48:19 -->
00:48:21
where there are strong
00:48:22 -->
00:48:36
opinions and each opinion is held by a number of scholars, classical scholars, then that is that is
that is a difference that we should be
00:48:37 -->
00:48:38
tolerating tolerate to.
00:48:39 -->
00:48:40
Okay or with
00:48:41 -->
00:48:42
Is it clear?
00:48:43 -->
00:48:47
Now, here there is an issue that comes
00:48:53 -->
00:48:57
ignorance from an or solely perspective is either
00:49:00 -->
00:49:04
for ignorant people and General Ignorance is other.
00:49:07 -->
00:49:12
Ignorance is other is unexcused a valid excuse me, okay, a person
00:49:14 -->
00:49:24
he prayed and his clothes, okay has an agenda. He doesn't know. His Salah is valid or invalid.
00:49:25 -->
00:49:31
it's valid. But if he knows that there is an agenda, and he prays with an adjuster, his follow up is
what
00:49:32 -->
00:49:34
is invalid. What is the difference?
00:49:37 -->
00:49:38
He doesn't know.
00:49:39 -->
00:49:41
Okay, acknowledge.
00:49:43 -->
00:49:52
Yeah, this is very important. When ignorance spread, then we have to be careful. So there might be
00:49:53 -->
00:49:54
a shared opinion,
00:49:56 -->
00:50:00
an odd opinion, but because of ignorance people are holding
00:50:00 -->
00:50:00
Holding it
00:50:02 -->
00:50:03
and therefore,
00:50:05 -->
00:50:09
okay, we should be careful before enjoining it
00:50:10 -->
00:50:12
or forbidding it. Is it clear?
00:50:14 -->
00:50:15
Is it clear?
00:50:16 -->
00:50:22
So we you have to take the other circumstances, and therefore the first step
00:50:24 -->
00:50:36
when you see someone who is doing something that is a clear Mancha, not a matter of differences is
to approach him in what
00:50:38 -->
00:50:39
a very nice way
00:50:41 -->
00:50:43
until you understand his view.
00:50:44 -->
00:50:45
Let me tell you something.
00:50:47 -->
00:50:55
Yeah, in Saudi Arabia, people consider smoking as heroin. I consider it as heroin smoking. Yeah.
00:50:57 -->
00:51:14
And normally, we use to Eonni enjoying the good and forbid the evil and when people are in a small,
we used to ask them to stop. And sometimes, of course, when we were young, we used to be a little
bit harsh with them.
00:51:15 -->
00:51:18
Okay, this is normal young people they like to
00:51:19 -->
00:51:20
prove themselves a
00:51:22 -->
00:51:41
long time ago, even before the last visit to England before I settled here, I visited some places
and I saw many of the others Mashallah with long beards and they come from the masjid they just
played there the first time I saw it, they just played Juma
00:51:42 -->
00:52:01
and they came and they started to smoke just outside the mosque if you meet us outside the message
so that for me that was really odd. How can they do that? Yeah. But later on I came to know that
many of their scholars believe that it is work
00:52:04 -->
00:52:41
and even some people say one or two even it doesn't is not counted as macros because as you are
drinking, okay, a cup of coffee. It has an element of okay and is wasted anyway and maybe a cup of
coffee is more expensive than you okay one or two cigarettes. So, if you want to say that this is
macro, you should say that drinking a cup of coffee is macro as well or even is Hara. Okay, so we
came to know about this. Now, imagine how do we want to those people and say, What are you doing
fear Allah you are just coming from the masjid.
00:52:44 -->
00:52:48
And I remembered that this happened, you know, during Hajj
00:52:50 -->
00:52:59
because in how did this is one of the wisdoms you meet all different types of people that we weren't
sure we were we could not handle it.
00:53:00 -->
00:53:08
To see people in arafa with long beards, elder people Mashallah white beards, and they are smoking.
00:53:09 -->
00:53:19
We cannot handle this. How come this person he travelled all the way to make this a bad day and
Mashallah, he has the longvida Mashallah. Just in
00:53:21 -->
00:53:24
the best day, and he's smoking.
00:53:25 -->
00:53:28
We cannot we could not handle it. But
00:53:29 -->
00:53:34
ignorance is a problem, as they say ignorance is the enemy of the person.
00:53:35 -->
00:53:45
That's why they say just approach him in a very nice way. And tell him what, you know, the
motivation behind that Masia
00:53:46 -->
00:53:51
The last thing the scholar said there is a difference between maaseiah that is related to others
00:53:52 -->
00:53:55
and the matsya that is related to what
00:53:57 -->
00:53:58
the individual
00:54:00 -->
00:54:04
Yeah, if a person if you see a person
00:54:06 -->
00:54:11
for example, trying to maybe * a woman in the street
00:54:12 -->
00:54:17
for you This is a mouse here, if you approach him and he said well, this is my wife.
00:54:18 -->
00:54:26
Yeah, but this is this is something visible, this is affecting the society you cannot say well, you
don't stop me because this is my wife.
00:54:28 -->
00:54:31
Okay. And similarly,
00:54:32 -->
00:54:35
if your HD had led, for example, to
00:54:36 -->
00:54:43
this point, the properties of other then although this is a matter of HDR for you,
00:54:45 -->
00:54:49
you should be stopped. And actually you should pay compensation.
00:54:50 -->
00:54:59
Take this example. Yeah, I forgot to mention this example if someone is wearing some clothes, that
are silk, but it is not natural.
00:55:00 -->
00:55:06
silk now the silk artificial silk there are two opinions about it.
00:55:07 -->
00:55:25
Some scholars said no it is like that what the the the natural silk so it is hella some scholars
said no the word silk It doesn't mean that it is what the *? Yeah. That the prophet SAW Selim
prohibited so if you so much Allah by
00:55:26 -->
00:55:44
chef Mustafa Mashallah he bought Jani or his wife bought for him a very nice shirt and he's happy
that okay, this is a gift from his wife stole a lot What are you doing? This is silk haram and you
just ripped it off?
00:55:46 -->
00:55:47
Is this acceptable?
00:55:49 -->
00:55:54
This How about Okay, hold on for you. It's not haram for me.
00:55:56 -->
00:56:02
And this you are violating the what? the rights of others
00:56:04 -->
00:56:04
okay.
00:56:07 -->
00:56:08
If minimal Jim
00:56:09 -->
00:56:13
had been among the one who, you know who then while Jim is
00:56:17 -->
00:56:18
the one who killed Taliban, have
00:56:21 -->
00:56:27
you ever gotten into T ma v. In Alibaba? And they'll actually wanna
00:56:28 -->
00:56:31
buy him again. He's one of the Howard
00:56:33 -->
00:56:38
he killed Dallas when they said when they killed him even imagine he was making liquor.
00:56:41 -->
00:56:50
He was making liquor. And they said when they imprisoned him, they said it's okay. As far as I can
do liquor. It's alright.
00:56:53 -->
00:56:58
But don't stop my tongue you from doing decay. This is what they said.
00:56:59 -->
00:57:03
But he what because of his he had he killed someone.
00:57:05 -->
00:57:15
So, we should judge him not according to his he had in this case because it is the worst. So we
should kill him because he because he murdered someone.
00:57:17 -->
00:57:19
Okay, because he murdered someone.
00:57:21 -->
00:57:22
Is it clear?
00:57:23 -->
00:57:51
So inshallah The matter is clear. So, we want you in sha Allah brothers, any to pass this message
and to any teach those brothers they are again, our brothers, and they might have a distorted
understanding. And they again, we say as even told me about him, Allah said that they might be
rewarded, because they are trying they feel that they are defending the deen, for example, it'd be
majan
00:57:53 -->
00:58:01
he might be Allah Allah, he might be rewarded for his intention. But punished. Okay, for what?
00:58:02 -->
00:58:03
For killing?
00:58:04 -->
00:58:18
Okay, I'm Muslim. And if you were to look at it from an unholy perspective, he went wrong because he
knows that the blood of a Muslim is what
00:58:21 -->
00:58:25
is of the highest sanctity? Yeah.
00:58:26 -->
00:58:27
And
00:58:28 -->
00:58:34
it should need it should not be violated. It should not be shaped by any issue held
00:58:36 -->
00:58:48
by any HTML and it is for the leader of the Muslims who were appointed by the Muslims or who became
the leader and he was accepted to
00:58:49 -->
00:58:57
shed his but his blood according to identify, commit reasonable.
00:58:58 -->
00:59:02
Okay, no questions from the sisters.
00:59:05 -->
00:59:06
By the zachman law fail
