Faraz Rabbani – Weekly Q&A Has the Hadith regarding the Opening of Constantinople

Faraz Rabbani
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speaker discusses the history of the openings of the new length, noting that many hadiths are biased against the new government and that the new government was a union of angels and the thirteenth-AK intuitive of the first year of the new length. The speaker also emphasizes the importance of taking history from reliable sources, citing the success of the new government and the need for altogether reviewing the history.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:00 --> 00:00:00
			There's
		
00:00:03 --> 00:00:05
			a question that has the hadith
		
00:00:05 --> 00:00:06
			of the
		
00:00:06 --> 00:00:08
			opening of Constantinople
		
00:00:08 --> 00:00:09
			been fulfilled?
		
00:00:16 --> 00:00:19
			There are many hadiths in which the prophet
		
00:00:19 --> 00:00:20
			promised about
		
00:00:22 --> 00:00:23
			the opening of Constantinople.
		
00:00:27 --> 00:00:29
			Amongst them is the Hadith that
		
00:00:34 --> 00:00:34
			That
		
00:00:39 --> 00:00:39
			truly
		
00:00:40 --> 00:00:41
			you shall conquer Constantinople
		
00:00:42 --> 00:00:45
			and what a great army is that army
		
00:00:45 --> 00:00:47
			and what a great leader shall be that
		
00:00:47 --> 00:00:50
			leader and most of the hadith scholars
		
00:00:50 --> 00:00:51
			who came
		
00:00:52 --> 00:00:53
			after the opening of
		
00:00:55 --> 00:00:58
			of Constantinople by Sultan Mohammed Al Fatiha
		
00:00:58 --> 00:01:02
			said that that refers to the first opening
		
00:01:02 --> 00:01:02
			of Constantinople,
		
00:01:03 --> 00:01:05
			which was done by
		
00:01:07 --> 00:01:09
			Sultan Mohammed Al Fatiha.
		
00:01:11 --> 00:01:13
			And he was by all accounts
		
00:01:13 --> 00:01:14
			a righteous
		
00:01:16 --> 00:01:17
			ruler
		
00:01:17 --> 00:01:20
			who actually rode into the city victorious
		
00:01:21 --> 00:01:21
			with his
		
00:01:22 --> 00:01:24
			spiritual guide and teacher
		
00:01:24 --> 00:01:27
			riding on his horse and he walked in.
		
00:01:30 --> 00:01:32
			And one should be wary of
		
00:01:34 --> 00:01:36
			unsound accounts of history as well. There are
		
00:01:36 --> 00:01:37
			many
		
00:01:37 --> 00:01:38
			European
		
00:01:38 --> 00:01:40
			historical accounts that are
		
00:01:41 --> 00:01:42
			very biased against,
		
00:01:43 --> 00:01:43
			the
		
00:01:44 --> 00:01:46
			the Ottomans. There are, of course,
		
00:01:47 --> 00:01:49
			Muslim accounts that are also not balanced that
		
00:01:49 --> 00:01:51
			makes it looks like it was a army
		
00:01:51 --> 00:01:52
			of angels,
		
00:01:53 --> 00:01:55
			but we take just as we take our
		
00:01:55 --> 00:01:57
			knowledge from reliable sources, we should take our
		
00:01:57 --> 00:01:58
			history
		
00:01:58 --> 00:02:01
			from reliable sources as well because it is
		
00:02:01 --> 00:02:01
			our history.