Ebrahim Gabriels – Response to the Khutbah of Which was filled Deception and Lies! Part3

Subhanallah, actually, I repeated that same statement to him

on Wednesday night on the 17th, right before he gave his one, two

nights before he gave his Utz and yet his kuzbai is still life. Imam

will be lean. The misguiding Imam. Imam will be lean. The misguided

Imams. Imam Al mubane, the misguided Imam, misguided Imams.

After 25 minutes,

the shaykhline said,

still in the context of law, came at 24 minutes. Why not did you

think Buddha Ibrahim Rasul, whatever the case may be. Then he

says, Why did the Imam

not verify the facts

and not make sure about the facts

before he gave the

before he spoke,

if we didn't see the fact before the how could we speak about it,

if we didn't see what occurred before the khutbah,

and this was days before the khutbah, how could we speak about

it?

Subhanallah,

the imam who gave your foot by him,

he spoke about it because, unlike you, he knew the ruling.

I say this.

He spoke about it because, unlike you, he knew your rulings.

Because when you were here the day after, the Quran still didn't know

it.

When we asked you, did you know

what the rituals of the mushriks contain?

Did you know what it means? Do you know in honor whom it is? He said,

No,

so isn't it enough for you that a Hindu priest,

a Hindu priest,

is overseeing these rituals and fulfilling these rituals. Is this

not enough for you?

We are going to get a to this issue of sanitizing.

Sanitizing.

What did you tell the Hindu priest?

How did you sanitize the Hindu priest from ship?

SubhanAllah? This is how they fool the Muslims, he tried to sanitize

it from Shir

In fact, I would still commend him to a degree, because at least he

tried to do something about the sheik just said, at

least He tried to sanitize it from

shirks.

Yeah, they didn't know what was happening.

So we spoke about it because we knew the ruling

and because we witnessed Yani, the scuffle and the Shi as other

people witnessed it

firsthand. The maybe when you see on the video, I don't want to say

that's first hand, but we saw it like other people saw it,

and it was all over the place. In the ayah,

he mentions the Subhanallah mentioned the issue of four, four

witnesses

with regards to sinner, obviously

forgetting that the matter you want to liken to eat was witnessed

by all.

What you talking about for witnesses

Subhanallah,

he claims

that the Imam gave the

he based his

on the fact that the boy never said the shahada, and he called

him a mushrik and a Hindu

when shebrahim was here

in The presence of Abu as brother Zahir the imamia and other

witnesses that were here,

we said to shakiba Rahim, even though the news of the shahada

reached us after the was not based

on thinking that there was Adam A shahada, because the first thing

We said was they're gonna say he took shahada.

First thing we said after the just watch they gonna come and say he

took shahada,

exactly

what they did. First thing he did when he came in here, you know

that he took shahada,

became Muslim.

Me

so if i mushrik,

live his entire life upon shiv,

and then the night before, he wants access to someone's

daughter,

and they tell him, look here you need to say the Shahada.

He says the Shahada. And tomorrow he continues with Hinduism.

So Subhanallah,

the shahada, that he made that in our parented behind you or

whoever,

this makes a world of difference if he continues with Hinduism.

So you can be

a Muslim Hindu,

because you said

doesn't matter that you did the rituals of the mushriks in honor

of the fire god,

you know, and that the Hindu priest did this ritual for you,

which is a a requirement for the marriage in the Hindu religion to

be established,

we are all supposed to just like, Okay, we don't know about that.

You're supposed to pretend that never happened. A

Hindu marriage took place,

a solemnizing of marriage in accordance with Hindu religion,

performed by a Hindu priest took place.

They circumambulated a holy fire.

There's no holy fire. What the Hindus believe is a holy fire.

They made the walk around it seven times,

seven times like we made around the Kaaba.

So we said to the Shaykh when he came,

what you want to say this about the shahada makes no difference.

It makes no difference.

Even if he said the shahada, and he was sent saying, the shahada,

this is not up to us. We don't know. We don't know. We judge by

what we saw.

We judge by what was apparent. We judge by what he did

and we gave a ruling on that, when

we say we judge, we're speaking about ourselves.

We judge by what we saw.

When we say we gave a ruling.

And

as

everyone knows, in the qurba, there was references given for the

ruling,

Imam Al nawabi. References was given for the ruling Sheik bin baz

was mentioned. She fozan and others were mentioned. The

reference was given for the fatwa. But

he says, No, you know someone here which is what is judging?

Judges,

there's a lot of things which

we had to make clear.

So the Khutba, first and foremost, was not based

on the fact that the person didn't say Shahada.

The khutba was based on what took place, on what happened

a person took shahada, Muslim, Mushrik

Muslim, Hindu, okay, but for who was the Hindu wedding?

The girl didn't grow up as a girl,

but there was a Hinduism, a Hindu solemnizing of the marriage. So

either you say this is for the Muslim girl, or this was for the

Hindu man,

one of the two.

Or we need to now verify which solemn solemnization of the

marriage do you consider

the Kabul and the hijab of Islam, or walking around the fire for the

ugly God in Hinduism,

which to then be solemnizing the marriage. For us, the acceptance

of the of the niqab Gani that is solemnizing the marriage. So So

which one do you consider,

besides the fact that she also gave to her husband

from Islam, not

from Islam, from Hinduism,

from Hinduism, where the girl gives mail to the husband.

So this was also done.

Vows were exchanged.

Vows were exchanged. Is

this from Islam,

subhanAllah, beginning students of Deen, it's not from Islam.

It's not from Islam. So the

was based on everything that took place. Amazing, really, didn't

touch one of those things.

Amazingly.

His own.

He didn't mention one of the things that took place at the

wedding. That was not from the deen of Al Islam, and that was not

from the Sunnah of Rasulullah, sallAllahu sallam, not one.

Then he said, and this was the real point, and why he wanted me

and the witnesses, some of them are here, why he wanted me to say

that I only received the news of the shahada afterwards

Subhanallah, a more narcissistic individual I've never

met. He said, I'm here for me, my

if you only receive the news of the Shah that after the khutbah,

then it means whatever you said about Ash is wrong.

Whatever you said about Ash is wrong, even if this was a Muslim

wedding, what I said about your stroke, even

this was a purely Muslim wedding, even if this was at a clear

competition, or Harvey competition. And I said, what I

said about you, it's true. He

said, so you must retract.

This is the meeting I'm referring to, the meeting of the mahapad.

You must retract that you said we are al imma al mubari, the

misguided Imams,

the witnesses. They know how many times he

was here for the purpose that if you didn't know about Tasha had

means what you said about us hasn't right. You must reflect

what you see is about us. So in his husband,

he says

he defamed

were prison, and he called him Kafi. I don't use the word. I said

Kufa.

He said he called him Kafi

SubhanAllah. He when we sat here in the meeting

after the

I said to the sheik, Sheik,

there is a difference between what taqsir al Muay, there is

a difference.

This is a difference. This is the Saturday after the Friday. There's

a difference between a general declaration of takfir and making

takfir of an individual. I don't know. Everyone was there.

I don't know there's a Muslim sitting

there. He says that he sees that he doesn't know what's going on.

He has no knowledge of Islam, no knowledge of tahit, no knowledge

of the Quran.

Can I say

no?

So I said the rulings that I gave, it was General rulings. It was

principles of the Sharia. He said, Yes. You said, Man Raja, of

course,

you said the one who is pleased with kufr is a kafir

SubhanAllah.

You find that, you find that strange to understand. The one who

is pleased with kufr is a Kafir. Is

that strange to understand? No strange to understand.

So you must make a

between a taxi, a

difference between a general tax fear, everyone who is

and taxi of the individual, this one you knew, that one you knew is

not excused, we acknowledge,

is not excused due to ignorance or anything like this. So there's a

difference.

Subhanallah, actually,

I repeated that same statement to him

on Wednesday night

on the 17th,

the night before he gave his kuzbach, one two nights before he

gave his and yet his kuzba, he's

still right.

I said, in my message,

I said,

I say again,

there is a difference between General taksir and takfir upon the

individual,

I said, and there is

a difference between the ruling on the action and the ruling on the

one

stand that this is from the kawaid of the Sharia and from the kawaida

takfir.

You can't make takfir without applying the Kawaii And

Alhamdulillah, we know this.

He doesn't know

it, either he doesn't understand it, either he couldn't distinguish

or he lied in

so you can choose. He

said, I call them kafir and I call them Imam Mubi. I said they are

misguided Imams, misguided leaders

and I need and they lead people to jahannam.

When Sheik Ibrahim came on Saturday,

he said, he said, right there.

And he says, You call us misguided leaders,

evil, misguided leaders.

I said, You are evil, misguiding leaders.

I said to him, she You are evil misguiding leaders, and you are

called as to friendship.

And you are calling us to buffer. And she

said, Why?

Why say this? You.