Ali Ataie – Is God Allah

Ali Ataie
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speakers discuss the use of words and phrases in Arabic and Arabic language, emphasizing the trivium and the importance of understanding the Greek word "IT" and the holy Greek language in the Bible. They also touch on the unexpected hesitation people experience in the Bible and the use of "people" in pop culture and the Bible's history.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:01 --> 00:00:02
			greetings of peace.
		
00:00:03 --> 00:00:08
			My name is Sofia Ahmed, and it's
my honor tonight on behalf of
		
00:00:08 --> 00:00:12
			zaytuna college, to welcome all of
you to what we hope is an
		
00:00:12 --> 00:00:15
			enlightening and stimulating
evening. I want to welcome all
		
00:00:15 --> 00:00:19
			those in the room here. But also,
we have a lot of people watching
		
00:00:19 --> 00:00:24
			online from across the country and
across the globe as far as I know.
		
00:00:24 --> 00:00:28
			So welcome to all of you. First
things first, we will begin
		
00:00:28 --> 00:00:33
			tonight's program with a Quran
recitation. And that will be done
		
00:00:33 --> 00:00:37
			first in Arabic and then reading
followed by reading of the
		
00:00:37 --> 00:00:43
			translation in English. And that
will be done by Abraham Najib. He
		
00:00:43 --> 00:00:47
			is a student at zaytuna College in
his senior year. Abraham Knuckey
		
00:00:47 --> 00:00:48
			please
		
00:00:50 --> 00:00:56
			it will be law he means shining
upon your Lagina GE game
		
00:00:58 --> 00:01:04
			Bismillah here Walkman you're he
		
00:01:07 --> 00:01:08
			now
		
00:01:10 --> 00:01:19
			has an ALA jabber Jabba Ali Nara
ADA Hoon Kashi I'm Muto sloth the
		
00:01:20 --> 00:01:22
			mean harsh yet in
		
00:01:25 --> 00:01:26
			what he can
		
00:01:27 --> 00:01:33
			do now God evil Halleen Cena Allah
whom yet
		
00:01:39 --> 00:01:42
			who Allahu La de la
		
00:01:43 --> 00:01:51
			ilaha illa who OReilly movie he
wants shahada
		
00:01:52 --> 00:01:56
			man or he
		
00:01:58 --> 00:02:00
			who Allahu
		
00:02:02 --> 00:02:13
			ilaha illa who al Maliki Malecon
dorso Salamone? Minalima Haman on
		
00:02:13 --> 00:02:18
			Aziz Zun jab BA. can be
		
00:02:19 --> 00:02:26
			super Han Allah here um, you
Sherry goon
		
00:02:27 --> 00:02:34
			Suba Han Allah here I'm Matthew
shriek goon
		
00:02:36 --> 00:02:43
			who Allahu Holly upon Barry
soundware Hola. Hola. Smile.
		
00:02:45 --> 00:02:45
			own host
		
00:02:47 --> 00:02:52
			used to be hula hula mafi sama was
the one
		
00:02:54 --> 00:02:59
			use that Beholder who mafi summer
he won
		
00:03:01 --> 00:03:13
			one who idolizes on hockey team.
Sada Allah Hoon and Alim was sada
		
00:03:13 --> 00:03:19
			rasuna Han nadie Yun, Karim. Juana
Juana that he can beat Aisha he
		
00:03:19 --> 00:03:25
			Shahidi in our shack eating
Allahumma Ohana earning RV.
		
00:03:43 --> 00:03:47
			Had we made this Quran descend
upon a mountain
		
00:03:48 --> 00:03:53
			that would have seen it humbled,
rent asunder by the fear of God.
		
00:03:55 --> 00:04:00
			These are the parables we set
forth for mankind, that happily
		
00:04:00 --> 00:04:01
			they may reflect,
		
00:04:02 --> 00:04:06
			he has God other than whom there
is no God,
		
00:04:07 --> 00:04:09
			nor of the unseen and the seen.
		
00:04:11 --> 00:04:14
			And he is the Compassionate, the
Merciful.
		
00:04:15 --> 00:04:18
			He is God other than whom there is
no God.
		
00:04:19 --> 00:04:26
			The sovereign, the holy, peace,
the faithful, the protector, the
		
00:04:26 --> 00:04:32
			Mighty, the Compeller, the proud,
Glory be to Him above the partners
		
00:04:32 --> 00:04:33
			they ascribe.
		
00:04:34 --> 00:04:41
			He has God, the Creator, the
maker, the fashioner unto Him
		
00:04:41 --> 00:04:46
			belong the most beautiful names.
Whatsoever is in the heavens and
		
00:04:46 --> 00:04:50
			earth glorifies Him. And here's
the mighty the wise
		
00:05:01 --> 00:05:02
			Thank you brain.
		
00:05:04 --> 00:05:07
			Before we begin the program, I
have one quick announcement, it's
		
00:05:07 --> 00:05:11
			more of a suggestion actually, for
those of you who may have noticed,
		
00:05:11 --> 00:05:16
			we have a new bookstore across the
hallway outside this hall. And
		
00:05:16 --> 00:05:20
			there's some great gift ideas in
there and books. And I've been
		
00:05:20 --> 00:05:24
			told for the audience in the hall
tonight, there's a special
		
00:05:24 --> 00:05:27
			discount on all the beautiful gift
ideas there. So if you want to
		
00:05:27 --> 00:05:29
			check it out after the program,
please do so.
		
00:05:31 --> 00:05:36
			This bookstore is a not just has
great products and books, but also
		
00:05:36 --> 00:05:39
			helps lead to not college and
generating income as well.
		
00:05:40 --> 00:05:45
			Tonight's program is going to be
fairly simple, we will, I will in
		
00:05:45 --> 00:05:48
			a minute introduce our dean of
faculty who will then introduce
		
00:05:48 --> 00:05:49
			our speaker
		
00:05:51 --> 00:05:55
			and topic for tonight, after which
you will have a talk by Dr. Olea
		
00:05:55 --> 00:05:59
			thigh, after which there will be
time for question and answers
		
00:05:59 --> 00:06:02
			inshallah. So they will we'll be
taking some questions and
		
00:06:02 --> 00:06:06
			questions from this audience. And
I will direct you to the
		
00:06:06 --> 00:06:09
			microphone that set up here. For
those of you want to ask
		
00:06:09 --> 00:06:12
			questions. Keep in mind that you
can ask questions later. And then
		
00:06:12 --> 00:06:16
			we'll also be taking questions
from our online audience as well.
		
00:06:16 --> 00:06:22
			So they will do that after the
talk. So let me introduce it's my
		
00:06:22 --> 00:06:24
			pleasure to introduce someone I
work with a lot every day at
		
00:06:24 --> 00:06:28
			zaytuna College and that is our
Dean of Faculty Dr. Mark Mark
		
00:06:28 --> 00:06:29
			Delp.
		
00:06:30 --> 00:06:33
			But to Doug's background is in
ancient and medieval topics,
		
00:06:33 --> 00:06:37
			especially the metaphysics of St.
Thomas Aquinas and new Platonism
		
00:06:38 --> 00:06:41
			and that he studied at our
neighboring institution here, the
		
00:06:41 --> 00:06:45
			graduate theological union. Over
the years he has taught scholastic
		
00:06:45 --> 00:06:48
			logic, medieval metaphysics and
courses centered around figures
		
00:06:48 --> 00:06:52
			such as Plato and Aristotle and
St. Augustine and St. Thomas
		
00:06:52 --> 00:06:55
			Aquinas. After a career teaching
at the Dominican School of
		
00:06:55 --> 00:06:59
			Theology and Philosophy, which is
also in the neighborhood here. He
		
00:06:59 --> 00:07:02
			has come to the tuna and has been
teaching courses here and is now
		
00:07:03 --> 00:07:04
			the dean of faculty.
		
00:07:05 --> 00:07:09
			Dr. Delp also teaches courses in
logic and philosophy at zaytuna.
		
00:07:09 --> 00:07:13
			So without further ado, please
welcome Dr. Mark Delp.
		
00:07:14 --> 00:07:18
			At our first commencement, Sheikh
Abdullah bin baya compared zaytuna
		
00:07:18 --> 00:07:19
			College to an olive tree.
		
00:07:21 --> 00:07:26
			He said, the zaytuna tree can grow
in the shade, it can grow on the
		
00:07:26 --> 00:07:30
			sand, it can grow in extreme
climates, and it can grow in
		
00:07:30 --> 00:07:31
			moderate climates.
		
00:07:32 --> 00:07:36
			It has qualities you don't find in
other trees. My hope is that
		
00:07:36 --> 00:07:40
			zaytuna College is a place where
all people can be shaded by its
		
00:07:40 --> 00:07:45
			intellectual tree, which is not
limited to the east or the west,
		
00:07:46 --> 00:07:50
			the zaytuna tree bears a fruit.
But from that fruit which is also
		
00:07:50 --> 00:07:55
			eaten, comes in oil. Even more
wondrously is a source of light.
		
00:07:56 --> 00:08:00
			And we use that as a tuna, the
olive branch as a universal sign
		
00:08:00 --> 00:08:02
			of peace, and quote,
		
00:08:04 --> 00:08:07
			This image has remained with me as
the definitive symbol of zaytuna
		
00:08:07 --> 00:08:08
			College.
		
00:08:09 --> 00:08:12
			Now the English word symbol comes
from the Greek symbol alone.
		
00:08:13 --> 00:08:17
			One of the meanings of which is
agreement or covenant.
		
00:08:18 --> 00:08:21
			There is a harmony and a firm
covenant, and the promise of
		
00:08:21 --> 00:08:26
			mutual cooperation even in the
harshest of times, but only if it
		
00:08:26 --> 00:08:30
			is only if it is foundational in
its very nature.
		
00:08:31 --> 00:08:35
			But it's a tuner. The scholarly
cooperation between East and West
		
00:08:35 --> 00:08:40
			is built into the foundations of
its curriculum, the trivium of
		
00:08:40 --> 00:08:44
			grammar, logic and rhetoric, each
of which skills the student must
		
00:08:44 --> 00:08:48
			master in both classical Western
and Islamic traditions.
		
00:08:49 --> 00:08:54
			beginning our cooperative venture
there, we then study perennial
		
00:08:54 --> 00:08:58
			texts in which the central ideas
of Islam and the classical West
		
00:08:58 --> 00:09:02
			begin to emerge, both on their own
and in conversation with each
		
00:09:02 --> 00:09:03
			other.
		
00:09:04 --> 00:09:07
			Here the integrity of the covenant
is challenged, as well as the
		
00:09:07 --> 00:09:09
			peace promised by the olive tree.
		
00:09:11 --> 00:09:14
			As a Catholic philosopher, I have
seen while teaching here at
		
00:09:14 --> 00:09:18
			zaytuna College, many wondrous
harmonies between Muslim and
		
00:09:18 --> 00:09:22
			Christian philosophy and theology,
even at the deepest levels of
		
00:09:22 --> 00:09:26
			their respective doctrines, only
to be dismayed upon discovering
		
00:09:26 --> 00:09:30
			that a conflict between two ideas
can threaten the whole
		
00:09:32 --> 00:09:36
			can Aristotle's theory of high low
morphism ever be reconciled with
		
00:09:36 --> 00:09:37
			Islamic occasional ism.
		
00:09:39 --> 00:09:43
			But in the face of seemingly
incommensurable ideas, I found the
		
00:09:43 --> 00:09:47
			promise of the intellectual olive
tree which in itself does not
		
00:09:47 --> 00:09:50
			signify a doctrine, but a bond of
kinship.
		
00:09:52 --> 00:09:57
			Can there be such a bond between
incommensurable ideas? Or indeed,
		
00:09:57 --> 00:09:59
			is it for the sake of
incommensurable idea
		
00:10:00 --> 00:10:02
			Is that the bond has been
established.
		
00:10:04 --> 00:10:08
			Each party must reach back to
common principles and common
		
00:10:08 --> 00:10:11
			methods of thinking. And thus we
retreat to the trivium and
		
00:10:11 --> 00:10:15
			rediscover the bonds we forged
they're hoping to return to the
		
00:10:15 --> 00:10:19
			higher realms of thought to seek
again the unity of ideas.
		
00:10:21 --> 00:10:25
			Well, under the zaytuna tree,
however, we need never despair, of
		
00:10:25 --> 00:10:27
			achieving the covenant we seek,
		
00:10:28 --> 00:10:31
			and may even come to believe that
after all, the greatest love is
		
00:10:31 --> 00:10:33
			between income measurables.
		
00:10:35 --> 00:10:38
			What we are attempting to do here
at zaytuna College is both
		
00:10:38 --> 00:10:42
			hazardous and exhilarating. We
have designed a curriculum that
		
00:10:42 --> 00:10:46
			holds us together and creative
tension, keeping us close to the
		
00:10:46 --> 00:10:48
			vitality of thought itself.
		
00:10:49 --> 00:10:53
			There has been much talk lately of
creative destruction. But
		
00:10:53 --> 00:10:57
			destruction, like unbridled
criticism is actually quite easy
		
00:10:57 --> 00:11:02
			to accomplish. far harder to
achieve is mindful reconstruction,
		
00:11:03 --> 00:11:07
			which in the areas of comparative
theology demands careful work
		
00:11:07 --> 00:11:08
			indeed.
		
00:11:10 --> 00:11:14
			And his lecture for us this
evening, Dr. Alia Thai has chosen
		
00:11:14 --> 00:11:19
			to address the central teachings
of three religious traditions. And
		
00:11:19 --> 00:11:22
			as you will hear, he has done that
careful work.
		
00:11:25 --> 00:11:29
			Dr. Olea Tai has been involved in
interfaith activities for over 15
		
00:11:29 --> 00:11:34
			years. He has been a guest
lecturer, and guest instructor at
		
00:11:34 --> 00:11:39
			several colleges and universities,
including Cal Poly state, UC
		
00:11:39 --> 00:11:45
			Davis, UC Berkeley, UCLA, Cal
State, East Bay, and others. He
		
00:11:45 --> 00:11:50
			studied various Islamic sciences
with local San Francisco Bay Area
		
00:11:50 --> 00:11:55
			scholars. He is a graduate of the
botter Arabic Language Institute
		
00:11:55 --> 00:12:00
			and how to remote Yemen and
studied at the prestigious Dar Al
		
00:12:00 --> 00:12:05
			Mustafa, also in Hadramaut, under
some of the most eminent scholars
		
00:12:05 --> 00:12:09
			in the world, he holds a master's
degree in Biblical Studies from
		
00:12:09 --> 00:12:13
			the graduate theological Union at
Berkeley, with emphasis upon the
		
00:12:13 --> 00:12:18
			New Testament. He is the first
Muslim seminarian in the 147 year
		
00:12:18 --> 00:12:21
			history of the school to earn this
degree.
		
00:12:22 --> 00:12:27
			He is certified in Arabic, Hebrew,
and Biblical Greek, and is fluent
		
00:12:27 --> 00:12:32
			in Farsi. He is. He has recently
obtained a PhD in Islamic biblical
		
00:12:32 --> 00:12:37
			hermeneutics at the GTU the
graduate theological union, and is
		
00:12:37 --> 00:12:41
			a faculty member at zaytuna
College, where he teaches Arabic,
		
00:12:41 --> 00:12:46
			Arabic grammar and texts,
Introduction to Introduction to
		
00:12:46 --> 00:12:52
			excuse me, to the Quran, Quranic
sciences and comparative theology.
		
00:12:53 --> 00:12:57
			His dissertation was entitled
authenticating the Johanna and in
		
00:12:57 --> 00:13:02
			G Sunette, Poli moronic,
interpretive methodological
		
00:13:02 --> 00:13:04
			approaches to the Gospel of John.
		
00:13:05 --> 00:13:08
			Please join me in welcoming Dr.
Olea. Ty.
		
00:13:15 --> 00:13:19
			Spent Rahim, Salah, lastly the
Mohammed in one early he was a
		
00:13:19 --> 00:13:21
			comedian Marian. Thank you, Dr.
Dope.
		
00:13:23 --> 00:13:27
			Thank you, brother, Ibrahim. Thank
you. So if you're Tonight's topic
		
00:13:27 --> 00:13:31
			is going to jump right into it. I
have a lot to say there's limited
		
00:13:31 --> 00:13:39
			time is God is the God of Abraham,
is the God of the Bible. Is that
		
00:13:39 --> 00:13:40
			God, Allah?
		
00:13:41 --> 00:13:44
			And the answer is yes. Thank you
very much.
		
00:13:46 --> 00:13:50
			I want to begin by looking at some
linguistic nuances of Arabic and
		
00:13:50 --> 00:13:53
			Hebrew, Arabic and Hebrew are
sister languages. They have a
		
00:13:53 --> 00:13:57
			common origin. They're part of a
group of languages called the
		
00:13:57 --> 00:14:02
			Semitic languages, aloha to Sam
yet, along with Ethiopic, and
		
00:14:02 --> 00:14:07
			Aramaic, Syriac, Akkadian,
Ugaritic, and others. The word
		
00:14:07 --> 00:14:10
			Semite actually comes from the
Hebrew word Shem. Shem was one of
		
00:14:10 --> 00:14:13
			the sons of Noah that survived the
flood.
		
00:14:14 --> 00:14:18
			The grandson of Shem, was named
Eva, which is where the word
		
00:14:18 --> 00:14:22
			Hebrew comes from, probably the
prophet hood. Allah His tsunami is
		
00:14:22 --> 00:14:25
			buried in Hadramaut. That was the
name of his grandson Also,
		
00:14:25 --> 00:14:31
			according to Genesis, chapter 10.
So I either spoke what German
		
00:14:31 --> 00:14:35
			philologist refer to as older
summit ish or some sort of proto
		
00:14:35 --> 00:14:40
			or primordial, Semitic language.
The major characteristic between
		
00:14:40 --> 00:14:44
			these two languages is that they
share primitive roots most of them
		
00:14:44 --> 00:14:50
			are try literal. In many cases,
the Hebrew and Arabic cognates are
		
00:14:50 --> 00:14:53
			literally identical. So for
example, the word nephesh in
		
00:14:53 --> 00:14:57
			Hebrew nephesh means soul or self,
what's the word in Arabic
		
00:14:58 --> 00:14:59
			knifes, right
		
00:15:00 --> 00:15:07
			or in Hebrew, or an Hebrew rule
Kadosh right rule Hello kudos, a
		
00:15:07 --> 00:15:11
			spirit of sanctification, a spirit
of holiness, or the word set D.
		
00:15:12 --> 00:15:17
			Which means a righteous one a holy
one Siddiq, or the Hebrew word
		
00:15:17 --> 00:15:22
			Psalm. What does that what does
that in Arabic. So yes, fasting,
		
00:15:22 --> 00:15:25
			sometimes not so obvious and you
have to look at what are what are
		
00:15:25 --> 00:15:30
			known as prominent letters. So
that the Hebrew word ahava, right?
		
00:15:30 --> 00:15:34
			The prominent letters are the hay
in the bait. So this is muhabba,
		
00:15:34 --> 00:15:40
			right Ha, and by means love for
the word in Arabic for God with a
		
00:15:40 --> 00:15:43
			capital G is Allah.
		
00:15:46 --> 00:15:52
			Allah, the earliest attestation of
Allah is an inscription at a place
		
00:15:52 --> 00:15:57
			called Cadet alpha in the first
century of the Common Era. What's
		
00:15:57 --> 00:16:01
			interesting about the name Allah
here is, and this is something
		
00:16:01 --> 00:16:04
			that we just talked about earlier,
is four letters. Elif LAMINAM,
		
00:16:04 --> 00:16:12
			hey, or Ha, if you take off the
initial Elif, you get Lilla. For
		
00:16:12 --> 00:16:18
			God, if you take off the first
lamb, you get Lahu for him. And if
		
00:16:18 --> 00:16:22
			you take off the next letter, you
get who him. I can't think of
		
00:16:22 --> 00:16:26
			another word in Arabic where this
happens. What's also interesting
		
00:16:26 --> 00:16:29
			about Arabic and Hebrew is that
all of the nouns in these
		
00:16:29 --> 00:16:33
			languages are gender fide. So
sometimes the gender is obvious
		
00:16:33 --> 00:16:38
			what's known as natural gender. So
like the word for boy in an Arabic
		
00:16:38 --> 00:16:42
			wallet, if you want to say this is
a boy, then you'd have to use the,
		
00:16:42 --> 00:16:45
			the masculine singular
demonstrative pronoun have that
		
00:16:45 --> 00:16:50
			Well, that's obvious. Or ze yell
ID in Hebrew. What's really
		
00:16:50 --> 00:16:55
			interesting is that body parts in
pairs in Arabic and Hebrew tend to
		
00:16:55 --> 00:17:00
			be feminine in the singular. So
the word for hand and Hebrew yard,
		
00:17:00 --> 00:17:03
			if I want to say this is a hand I
would use the feminine singular
		
00:17:03 --> 00:17:08
			demonstrative pronoun Zota yard
heavy YED. Right. So every word is
		
00:17:08 --> 00:17:11
			assigned a Genesis, every word has
a gender, sometimes it's natural.
		
00:17:11 --> 00:17:15
			Sometimes it's a lexical gender.
So for example, the sun and the
		
00:17:15 --> 00:17:21
			moon, right? There are genderless.
So the Arabs had to assign a
		
00:17:21 --> 00:17:25
			lexical gender, the moon happens
to be masculine, the son happens
		
00:17:25 --> 00:17:30
			to be feminine. So we deal with
Allah, the name of God. This word
		
00:17:30 --> 00:17:34
			is lexically, masculine, but
Muslims do not believe that Allah
		
00:17:34 --> 00:17:38
			is male. God is not male nor
female. Lisa committed he shaped
		
00:17:38 --> 00:17:42
			when the Quran says there's
nothing like the likes of God. But
		
00:17:42 --> 00:17:46
			the Quran uses masculine pronouns
like a Hua, he is because the word
		
00:17:46 --> 00:17:51
			itself is lexically masculine.
Another thing interesting about
		
00:17:51 --> 00:17:55
			the name Allah is you can't say
the name of God without your
		
00:17:55 --> 00:17:58
			tongue prostrating. Try it.
		
00:17:59 --> 00:18:03
			I saw it frustrated. Yes. You
know, interesting also, as some
		
00:18:03 --> 00:18:06
			Muslim theologians, they actually
have a quick definition of the
		
00:18:06 --> 00:18:11
			word Allah, simply for academic
purposes. Obviously, there's no
		
00:18:12 --> 00:18:16
			adequate definition of God. At
best what we say about God is a
		
00:18:16 --> 00:18:19
			distant, distant approximation,
and at worst were totally wrong.
		
00:18:19 --> 00:18:24
			Aquinas said, even the praise of
God is so remote remote from his
		
00:18:24 --> 00:18:28
			reality. Right? One of my teachers
said that praising God requires
		
00:18:28 --> 00:18:34
			repentance, because you can never
get to the reality of God. My
		
00:18:34 --> 00:18:39
			monitor he said, If you praise a
king, who has 1000 gold pieces for
		
00:18:39 --> 00:18:43
			having 1000 silver pieces, then
you're insulting and disparaging
		
00:18:44 --> 00:18:44
			the king,
		
00:18:45 --> 00:18:49
			but this is what they say. They
say Allah is I'm gonna Allah that
		
00:18:49 --> 00:18:56
			a proper name denoting the essence
YG boo Jude, the one who has
		
00:18:56 --> 00:19:00
			necessary existence, I didn't
muster happily Jimmy or the
		
00:19:00 --> 00:19:06
			Camelot, the one who is deserving
of every perfection, while materna
		
00:19:06 --> 00:19:12
			Z and Jimmy and NACA is and he is
absolutely free of every type of
		
00:19:12 --> 00:19:14
			fault or deficiency.
		
00:19:16 --> 00:19:20
			So the question is, is the Muslim
and the Christian God, the same? I
		
00:19:20 --> 00:19:25
			would say in principle, it's the
same so Allah is not a foreign
		
00:19:25 --> 00:19:29
			god. Right? Allah is the God of
Abraham.
		
00:19:30 --> 00:19:34
			If you look in the Christian
Bible, if you open the first page
		
00:19:34 --> 00:19:38
			and go to keytab, tech queen, the
book of Genesis, in sorry, the
		
00:19:38 --> 00:19:42
			Arabic Bible that was obviously
done by that was translated by
		
00:19:42 --> 00:19:48
			Arab Christians, you'll find thi
filled but a halacha Allah who are
		
00:19:48 --> 00:19:50
			somehow it was Ottawa.
		
00:19:51 --> 00:19:57
			In the beginning, Allah created
the heavens and the earth. So just
		
00:19:57 --> 00:19:59
			a little bit here with with
entomology,
		
00:20:00 --> 00:20:04
			The definite article in Hebrew is
different than an Arabic. The
		
00:20:04 --> 00:20:08
			definite article in Hebrew looks
like this. It's a high with a PATA
		
00:20:08 --> 00:20:13
			or Fatah and then a doggish forte,
a doubling in the next letter. So
		
00:20:13 --> 00:20:17
			the word for king and a king in
Hebrew was Mela. But if I want to
		
00:20:17 --> 00:20:22
			say the King, I would say hi Meles
Meles the definite article in
		
00:20:22 --> 00:20:23
			Arabic is Allah.
		
00:20:25 --> 00:20:33
			So Alif Lam, right? And the word
for a deity or a god in Arabic, is
		
00:20:33 --> 00:20:38
			Isla Han, which also begins with
an Alif Lam the same letters. So
		
00:20:38 --> 00:20:41
			there's an opinion and this is
something that Muslim philologist
		
00:20:41 --> 00:20:43
			also mentioned, is that the word
Allah
		
00:20:45 --> 00:20:47
			is simply a combination
		
00:20:48 --> 00:20:50
			of Al Isla who
		
00:20:51 --> 00:20:56
			al Isla, who and over time this
guttural Hamza in the middle it
		
00:20:56 --> 00:20:59
			elided. And we have the word Allah
		
00:21:02 --> 00:21:07
			ZBD and his wonderful lexicon
attached without us. He says that
		
00:21:07 --> 00:21:12
			this is unlikely, because in
Arabic, we can say Ya Allah.
		
00:21:14 --> 00:21:19
			Yah is a vocative particle. So
this translates to Oh God. And
		
00:21:19 --> 00:21:22
			there's a rule in Arabic that the
vocative particle cannot
		
00:21:22 --> 00:21:27
			immediately precede the definite
article. So if these two letters
		
00:21:27 --> 00:21:30
			have a definite article, then it'd
be improper Arabic to say Ya
		
00:21:30 --> 00:21:34
			Allah, you'd have to say
something. Yeah, you Hala or
		
00:21:34 --> 00:21:38
			something like that. So, Edward
lane, he says that the most
		
00:21:38 --> 00:21:42
			correct opinion that says that's a
direct quote from him, is that
		
00:21:42 --> 00:21:50
			most are most likely. The initial
Alif Lam, on the word Allah is
		
00:21:51 --> 00:21:57
			related to the LF ulimate. In this
Hebrew word, ale,
		
00:21:58 --> 00:22:03
			which is the generic word for God.
In Hebrew. This word ale is
		
00:22:03 --> 00:22:09
			attested in the Tanakh, the Hebrew
Bible, but more often than not,
		
00:22:09 --> 00:22:13
			it's found in the plural form,
which looks like this.
		
00:22:17 --> 00:22:21
			Which is pronounced Elohim
actually have a Hebrew translation
		
00:22:21 --> 00:22:25
			of the Quran in my office, I
didn't bring it. But the first
		
00:22:25 --> 00:22:29
			page says be shame Elohim
Bismillah in the name of God,
		
00:22:30 --> 00:22:35
			right. So Elohim is a plural this
here. This suffix makes it plural.
		
00:22:35 --> 00:22:38
			This is a hearing with a Yoda and
a meme. This is like the
		
00:22:38 --> 00:22:41
			equivalent of the gem aroma Veca
Salem in Arabic the sound
		
00:22:41 --> 00:22:46
			masculine plural. However, this is
not a plural of numbers, at least
		
00:22:46 --> 00:22:49
			not when we're referring to the
God of Abraham.
		
00:22:50 --> 00:22:54
			Scholars believe that this is
called a plurality magis status,
		
00:22:54 --> 00:22:59
			or a royal plural, Gemma and
Maliki. So if we quote again
		
00:22:59 --> 00:23:02
			Genesis one one we will read in
Hebrew but a sheath of Bara
		
00:23:03 --> 00:23:09
			Elohim, at Hashem I am the edits.
In the beginning God plural
		
00:23:09 --> 00:23:14
			respected, plural, Royal plural,
created the heavens and the earth.
		
00:23:15 --> 00:23:19
			Now in certain pistol theme, that
is to say verses of the Tanakh
		
00:23:20 --> 00:23:26
			that stress the uniqueness of God.
Ale the singular is used. For
		
00:23:26 --> 00:23:33
			example, in Hosea 11, nine, we
read key I know he al Veilleux
		
00:23:33 --> 00:23:40
			ish. Indeed, I am a God, and not a
man. This has translated in the
		
00:23:40 --> 00:23:44
			Septuagint, the LX ex
theosophical, me chi uHq and throw
		
00:23:44 --> 00:23:45
			a pass.
		
00:23:46 --> 00:23:48
			And according to gesenius,
		
00:23:50 --> 00:23:51
			you know, you have this other
form.
		
00:23:53 --> 00:23:56
			That's attested in the Hebrew
Bible. This is a low
		
00:23:58 --> 00:24:03
			and a low according to gesenius is
the emphatic form of ale, the
		
00:24:03 --> 00:24:06
			emphatic form. So quite often in
the Hebrew Bible, you'll find a
		
00:24:06 --> 00:24:13
			low in the Hebrew when God is
juxtaposed to false gods. For
		
00:24:13 --> 00:24:18
			example, Deuteronomy 3217 It says
about the Canaanites Yes. bahala
		
00:24:18 --> 00:24:24
			che Diem, low elo. They sacrifice
to che Diem Shayol teens to
		
00:24:24 --> 00:24:30
			demons, and not to ello not to God
and phatic Elohim Lo, yah, room to
		
00:24:30 --> 00:24:34
			Gods. Now it's a real plural to
gods that they don't even know.
		
00:24:34 --> 00:24:35
			Right?
		
00:24:36 --> 00:24:39
			Now the lingua franca of the
ancient Near East in the sixth
		
00:24:39 --> 00:24:43
			century, before the Common Era,
the language of the Persian
		
00:24:43 --> 00:24:45
			Empire, I had to throw on the word
Persian. My students know what I'm
		
00:24:45 --> 00:24:46
			talking about,
		
00:24:47 --> 00:24:53
			was a language called Aramaic.
Right? So major portions of the
		
00:24:53 --> 00:24:58
			book of Daniel and Ezra are in
Aramaic with Hebrew characters and
		
00:24:58 --> 00:25:00
			Aramaic we find
		
00:25:00 --> 00:25:00
			Word God.
		
00:25:01 --> 00:25:02
			Maybe I should use it.
		
00:25:04 --> 00:25:04
			There we go.
		
00:25:06 --> 00:25:10
			We find the word God attested in
the Aramaic as this
		
00:25:14 --> 00:25:23
			which is pronounced Hola. Hola soy
a comments Hey, aspiration, Allah.
		
00:25:24 --> 00:25:30
			For example we read in Daniel 228
Brahm, e Thai Allah be Shi Mejia.
		
00:25:31 --> 00:25:38
			There is God in heaven. Ezra five
one be soon Allah, Israel in the
		
00:25:38 --> 00:25:39
			name of the God of Israel.
		
00:25:41 --> 00:25:46
			And Hebrew we also have these Theo
forrec names TheFork names or
		
00:25:46 --> 00:25:49
			names that have the word ale
embedded within them, usually as a
		
00:25:49 --> 00:25:55
			prefix or a suffix. We know these
names Godfrey ALA, right? What's
		
00:25:55 --> 00:25:55
			Gabrielle?
		
00:25:57 --> 00:26:02
			Gabrielle right the power of God
mi ka Al. Mi Ka L very
		
00:26:02 --> 00:26:04
			interesting. This is a rhetorical
question than a Michael is a
		
00:26:04 --> 00:26:09
			rhetorical question. Man ka Allah
who is like God, who is like God,
		
00:26:10 --> 00:26:15
			mica Ale, Ishmael. Right. You
shmatte is an imperfect tense
		
00:26:15 --> 00:26:19
			about it. Yes, Mahala? Yes, Matt
Allah, God will hear
		
00:26:20 --> 00:26:22
			Eliyahu
		
00:26:23 --> 00:26:27
			Eliyahu is Elijah le My God is yah
hoo. This is one of the names of
		
00:26:27 --> 00:26:31
			God in the Hebrew Bible. Also, in
rabbinical literature. Yah hoo.
		
00:26:31 --> 00:26:37
			Sometimes just who, sometimes just
ya, hallelujah. Right. This is the
		
00:26:37 --> 00:26:42
			PL or form to imperative. Praise
God with intensity. Praise a yah
		
00:26:43 --> 00:26:47
			with with intensity. Anytime you
see that Ale, right L Ron Hubbard.
		
00:26:48 --> 00:26:52
			Now I'm just kidding. I'm sorry. I
had to throw it in. I'm sorry. I
		
00:26:52 --> 00:26:53
			use that joke every time. I don't
mean any.
		
00:26:55 --> 00:27:03
			Anyway, Rabbi Louis Jacobs. He
says here, this Ale, this root ale
		
00:27:03 --> 00:27:08
			is found in the generic name of
God among all Semitic peoples. We
		
00:27:08 --> 00:27:12
			know from ooga Riddick literature,
that ale was the name of one of
		
00:27:12 --> 00:27:18
			the Canaanite gods, so all Semites
they call God ale or variation of
		
00:27:18 --> 00:27:22
			it. So could it be that the
Muslims refer to Allah from Ale,
		
00:27:23 --> 00:27:27
			but are actually worshipping
another god? Okay, many anti
		
00:27:27 --> 00:27:31
			Muslim polemicists, they
perpetuate this claim that Muslims
		
00:27:31 --> 00:27:36
			worship something called scene or
the Babylonian moon god. Right?
		
00:27:36 --> 00:27:38
			It's interesting. There was a
Christian preacher in the second
		
00:27:38 --> 00:27:42
			century named Marcion, who died
160, the Common Era, very
		
00:27:42 --> 00:27:46
			interesting character. He was a
gnostic, he was a dosa test. He
		
00:27:46 --> 00:27:52
			said that, that the Jews worship
and inferior God, a deceiver God,
		
00:27:53 --> 00:27:56
			and that we Christians worship a
better Gods who's a bi theist?
		
00:27:56 --> 00:28:00
			Jews worship another God. Right.
And he's quite popular in Rome.
		
00:28:00 --> 00:28:05
			Marcion was vehemently opposed by
proto Orthodox Church Fathers.
		
00:28:06 --> 00:28:10
			Why? Because it was important for
the church fathers to tell people
		
00:28:10 --> 00:28:14
			that this is not another God.
Right? This is the God of Israel.
		
00:28:14 --> 00:28:18
			This is the God of Abraham. Yes,
we have different concepts of God,
		
00:28:18 --> 00:28:23
			we theologizing differently about
this God, but it's the same God.
		
00:28:23 --> 00:28:26
			Now, when I first heard this
claim, when I was an
		
00:28:26 --> 00:28:29
			undergraduate, like three or four
years ago, I don't know something
		
00:28:29 --> 00:28:29
			like that.
		
00:28:31 --> 00:28:34
			I thought it was ridiculous. And I
still think it's ridiculous. But
		
00:28:34 --> 00:28:37
			here's the thing. I go to a lot of
churches. And I'll tell you almost
		
00:28:37 --> 00:28:41
			every single time this comes up,
do you worship the moon god?
		
00:28:42 --> 00:28:45
			Sometimes it's very subtle. Why do
you have a lunar calendar?
		
00:28:46 --> 00:28:52
			What does the star and the moon on
the flag of Pakistan mean? Right?
		
00:28:52 --> 00:28:55
			Probably the most well known of
these anti Muslim polemicist
		
00:28:55 --> 00:28:59
			that's perpetuating this false
narrative. It's a man named Walid
		
00:28:59 --> 00:29:02
			Shabbat, I don't know if you've
heard of him, but he watched his
		
00:29:02 --> 00:29:06
			videos, you know, hundreds of
1000s of hits, views on his
		
00:29:06 --> 00:29:09
			videos. Right. And, you know, he
described himself as a former
		
00:29:09 --> 00:29:12
			terrorist, who became a born
again, Christian.
		
00:29:14 --> 00:29:17
			But just to give you an idea of
one of the things that he is
		
00:29:17 --> 00:29:22
			saying, in front of his many, many
large audiences, so according to,
		
00:29:22 --> 00:29:25
			and I show this to my students
during the week, according to what
		
00:29:25 --> 00:29:26
			each Shabbat
		
00:29:27 --> 00:29:30
			you know, he said, he said he
looked at the Codex Vaticanus.
		
00:29:31 --> 00:29:34
			Right. Once you throw that term
out there, you're like, Whoa, that
		
00:29:34 --> 00:29:36
			accounts and here's the thing
about what Shabbat he speaks
		
00:29:36 --> 00:29:40
			Arabic. So he'll say for example,
you know, La ilaha illallah,
		
00:29:40 --> 00:29:42
			Muhammad Rasool Allah and then the
Christian audiences. He's
		
00:29:42 --> 00:29:47
			obviously a scholar, every Tom
dick and Abdul knows how to say La
		
00:29:47 --> 00:29:50
			ilaha illAllah. Muhammad Rasul
Allah. Right. Well, he knows what
		
00:29:50 --> 00:29:52
			he's talking about. So at the end
of the day, it's an appeal to
		
00:29:52 --> 00:29:55
			unqualified authority. But here's
what he says. He says, I looked at
		
00:29:55 --> 00:30:00
			the Codex data Canis revelation
1318 gives the number of
		
00:30:00 --> 00:30:05
			The beast is represented by these
three Greek letters, according to
		
00:30:05 --> 00:30:11
			Gematria, this is 600. This is 60.
And this is six equals 666. Right?
		
00:30:11 --> 00:30:12
			This is what he says.
		
00:30:13 --> 00:30:17
			Now, I looked at the Codex
Vaticanus. There is no book of
		
00:30:17 --> 00:30:22
			Revelation in the Codex Vaticanus.
That's number one. So I'm thinking
		
00:30:22 --> 00:30:26
			maybe he's thinking about the
Codex Sinaiticus, another great
		
00:30:26 --> 00:30:30
			fourth century onshore manuscript
and Alexandrian Text type. The
		
00:30:30 --> 00:30:35
			Codex Sinaiticus actually spells
out 666 hexa, cassioli hexa
		
00:30:35 --> 00:30:40
			contacts doesn't have these
letters. So I don't really know
		
00:30:40 --> 00:30:44
			what he's referring to here. Maybe
the Textus Receptus, whatever it
		
00:30:44 --> 00:30:47
			is, but here's what he says this
is what He literally says. And he
		
00:30:47 --> 00:30:52
			gets gasps from the audience. So
he says here we have the x if you
		
00:30:52 --> 00:30:54
			take these two and turn them over
		
00:30:58 --> 00:31:01
			you get this and this says
Bismillah.
		
00:31:05 --> 00:31:09
			Bismillah is the mark of the
beasts. Now, you know, you have to
		
00:31:09 --> 00:31:14
			put a dot here. This doesn't work.
This can't be attached. That's not
		
00:31:14 --> 00:31:18
			a hey, what you know, okay. And
then he said here here you have
		
00:31:18 --> 00:31:19
			two swords.
		
00:31:21 --> 00:31:26
			This is what he says. To pack
audiences 1 million hits. Right
		
00:31:26 --> 00:31:29
			that's like me going you know,
here. You know, Santa.
		
00:31:30 --> 00:31:35
			I move this right here. I move
that right there. Satan
		
00:31:40 --> 00:31:44
			or, you know, like this www. You
know, when you put in a website, I
		
00:31:44 --> 00:31:46
			don't know much about computers.
I'm kind of a techno peasant. But
		
00:31:47 --> 00:31:53
			www right. Oh, well, W is is the
letter vav or wow, I say vav in
		
00:31:53 --> 00:31:58
			Hebrew, and you know what I'm
saying? I live bait Gimel Dalet.
		
00:31:58 --> 00:32:02
			Hey, Vav 123456666.
		
00:32:05 --> 00:32:09
			Okay, I think I've made my point
with so here's the thing.
		
00:32:11 --> 00:32:14
			What these people do is they take
you know, a true historical
		
00:32:14 --> 00:32:18
			narrative, and they sprinkle some
deception. So there is something
		
00:32:18 --> 00:32:20
			called the chronicle of Naboo
Unitas
		
00:32:21 --> 00:32:27
			Naboo. Notice nebo notice was the
last king of Babylon. Right while
		
00:32:27 --> 00:32:31
			the Shabbat says he was the son of
Nebuchadnezzar. No, the son of
		
00:32:31 --> 00:32:35
			Nebuchadnezzar as was was named
Imelda Mar Duke. This is the last
		
00:32:35 --> 00:32:39
			king of, of Babylon. So the
Chronicle says a noble knight is
		
00:32:39 --> 00:32:46
			he came to northern Arabia. Right?
He came to a place called tame Ma,
		
00:32:46 --> 00:32:49
			which looks like this.
		
00:32:51 --> 00:32:56
			In Hebrew tamer, and being in
tamer, it gave him access to
		
00:32:56 --> 00:33:00
			southern cities. And the Chronicle
mentions a city called er three
		
00:33:00 --> 00:33:00
			boo.
		
00:33:02 --> 00:33:06
			He acted evil, right yesterday,
Boo Yathrib. This is probably yes,
		
00:33:06 --> 00:33:09
			rib is the pre Islamic name of the
city of Medina, the city of the
		
00:33:09 --> 00:33:12
			Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu
sallam.
		
00:33:13 --> 00:33:18
			So as the narrative goes from the
polemicists that Naboo Unitas he
		
00:33:18 --> 00:33:22
			tried to convert the Arabs to
worship Marduk and it didn't work.
		
00:33:23 --> 00:33:29
			So then he tried sin. Si n, the
Babylonian moon god, and
		
00:33:29 --> 00:33:32
			apparently this caught like
wildfire. This is the narrative
		
00:33:32 --> 00:33:35
			1000 years before the birth of the
Prophet in Medina, the last
		
00:33:35 --> 00:33:40
			Babylonian king went to tamer and
can convert it or convince some of
		
00:33:40 --> 00:33:44
			the Arabs there, that to worship
sin, the Babylonian Moon God,
		
00:33:44 --> 00:33:47
			therefore, every Muslim in the
world worships the Babylonian moon
		
00:33:47 --> 00:33:52
			god. So is a terrible non sequitur
argument. First of all, there's
		
00:33:52 --> 00:33:56
			there's no atom illogical
correspondence correspondences
		
00:33:56 --> 00:33:59
			between sin and the name Allah.
But then again, the argument is,
		
00:33:59 --> 00:34:01
			well, maybe the error was
recalling sin Allah.
		
00:34:02 --> 00:34:05
			Here's another thing about the
polemicist is they don't tell you
		
00:34:05 --> 00:34:09
			the whole story. It's half the
story. If you asked me. All right.
		
00:34:09 --> 00:34:13
			Tell me about Paul. And I say,
Well, Paul was a Benjamin I'd
		
00:34:13 --> 00:34:16
			Pharisee who used to persecute
Christians. And you say, That's
		
00:34:16 --> 00:34:22
			it. Yeah. That's deceptive. Tell
me about Judas Iscariot. He was a
		
00:34:22 --> 00:34:27
			disciple of Jesus. What else? No.
Don't worry about it. You know,
		
00:34:27 --> 00:34:32
			like the Arab say, you know, la
takanobu. Salah. Don't pray? Well,
		
00:34:32 --> 00:34:35
			untrim secara right. Gotta keep
reading. Don't pray while you're
		
00:34:35 --> 00:34:36
			intoxicated.
		
00:34:37 --> 00:34:42
			So, in 1947, the Dead Sea scrolls
were discovered. And there was an
		
00:34:42 --> 00:34:46
			interesting parchment discovered,
written in Aramaic. It's
		
00:34:46 --> 00:34:51
			catalogued as for q 242. It was
found in Qumran cave number four.
		
00:34:52 --> 00:34:53
			It's called the prayer of Naboo
Unitas
		
00:34:55 --> 00:34:58
			Hmm. So this is something that the
Essenes the Jewish community had
		
00:34:58 --> 00:34:59
			Qumran on the shores of the Dead.
		
00:35:00 --> 00:35:03
			See something that they revered is
almost scripture. And it's very
		
00:35:03 --> 00:35:06
			short but we have Naboo Knight is
speaking in the first person.
		
00:35:07 --> 00:35:10
			Here's what he says. I was
afflicted with an ulcer for seven
		
00:35:10 --> 00:35:15
			years, and an exorcist pardon my
sins. He was a Jewish sage from
		
00:35:15 --> 00:35:19
			among the children of exile of
Judah. So the southern kingdom so
		
00:35:19 --> 00:35:23
			according to Western historians,
the first massive wave of Jews
		
00:35:23 --> 00:35:28
			coming into Arabia came after the
collapse of Judah, the southern
		
00:35:28 --> 00:35:32
			kingdom. 586. Before the Common
Era during the Babylonian
		
00:35:32 --> 00:35:36
			invasion, Jeremiah went into
Egypt, many Arab many Jews, they
		
00:35:36 --> 00:35:39
			came and poured down into the
Arabian Peninsula. That's why you
		
00:35:39 --> 00:35:42
			have all these Jewish communities
and Haber and take him out and
		
00:35:42 --> 00:35:42
			yesterday
		
00:35:44 --> 00:35:48
			Naboo Unitas continues, and he
said to me, this Jewish sage he
		
00:35:48 --> 00:35:52
			said to me, recount this in
writing to glorify and exalt the
		
00:35:52 --> 00:35:57
			name of the Most High God. And so
I wrote this, I was afflicted with
		
00:35:57 --> 00:36:01
			an ulcer in tema, by decree of the
Most High God. For seven years I
		
00:36:01 --> 00:36:06
			prayed to the gods of silver and
gold, bronze and iron, wood and
		
00:36:06 --> 00:36:11
			stone and clay because I had
believed that they were gods. So
		
00:36:11 --> 00:36:15
			who is this most high God that
never Unitas came to embrace?
		
00:36:16 --> 00:36:19
			Well, in the parchment and
Aramaic, this is what he's called.
		
00:36:30 --> 00:36:31
			Allah Ha,
		
00:36:33 --> 00:36:33
			aloha.
		
00:36:35 --> 00:36:36
			Ally,
		
00:36:37 --> 00:36:41
			Aloha ally, Allahu Allah.
		
00:36:42 --> 00:36:47
			And definitely with aloha, and
Allah. There are etymological
		
00:36:48 --> 00:36:51
			correspondences. But what's more
important here is that this is not
		
00:36:51 --> 00:36:56
			the moon god. This is the God of
Abraham. This is the God of the
		
00:36:56 --> 00:36:59
			Jews. You see, the Arabs at the
time of the Prophet Mohammed
		
00:36:59 --> 00:37:02
			continued to revere Allah as the
Most High God, but there was a
		
00:37:02 --> 00:37:06
			falling away and they adopted
lesser deities, they've practiced
		
00:37:06 --> 00:37:10
			a form of polytheism called
Henault theism, where there's one
		
00:37:10 --> 00:37:15
			supreme god but lesser deities.
The there was also a group of, of
		
00:37:15 --> 00:37:19
			Arabs in Mecca during the time of
the prophets birth, who were
		
00:37:19 --> 00:37:24
			called Allahu NEFA. Allahu NEFA.
These were people who rejected all
		
00:37:24 --> 00:37:30
			Gods except Allah. Why? Because
this they claimed was the legacy
		
00:37:30 --> 00:37:33
			of their forefather Abraham and
Ishmael and the Prophet was
		
00:37:33 --> 00:37:36
			amongst them before he was
commissioned as a prophet, the
		
00:37:36 --> 00:37:42
			Arabs before Islam, they knew
their history they knew the Kaaba,
		
00:37:42 --> 00:37:47
			for example, the cube or House in
Mecca was built by Abraham and
		
00:37:47 --> 00:37:47
			Ishmael.
		
00:37:49 --> 00:37:52
			So Islam is in a sense a
reinstating of the primordial
		
00:37:52 --> 00:37:57
			tradition, or faith of Abraham,
and a cursory glance at verses in
		
00:37:57 --> 00:38:01
			the Quran Kula sadhaka Allah for
Tibi, Urmila to Ibrahima Hanifa
		
00:38:01 --> 00:38:06
			What am I can I mean I'm sure he
can say follow the religion of
		
00:38:06 --> 00:38:10
			Abraham, the true and faith the
archetypal monotheistic he did not
		
00:38:10 --> 00:38:14
			associate a partner's with God. So
Allah was understood as the most
		
00:38:14 --> 00:38:18
			high God even before Islam amongst
the Arabs. So what the polemicist
		
00:38:18 --> 00:38:19
			will say is look,
		
00:38:21 --> 00:38:25
			Islam was not invented by the by
Muhammad, you know the prophets
		
00:38:25 --> 00:38:27
			father's name was Abdullah.
		
00:38:28 --> 00:38:31
			Right, so this was a pagan god
before Islam now you see how
		
00:38:31 --> 00:38:36
			they've deceived us. The Arabs
knew of Allah as the Most High
		
00:38:36 --> 00:38:40
			God, but they had gone to
worshipping other gods as well. So
		
00:38:40 --> 00:38:43
			what the Prophet Muhammad as
Muslims understand, the Abrahamic
		
00:38:43 --> 00:38:49
			tradition of monotheism was re
instituted amongst them. If you
		
00:38:49 --> 00:38:54
			look at the Quran, 4137 and from
his signs are the day and the
		
00:38:54 --> 00:38:59
			night, the sun and the moon
lattice, Julie Shamcey wala lil
		
00:38:59 --> 00:39:04
			Kamara. Do not prostrate yourself
to the sun nor to the moon was jus
		
00:39:04 --> 00:39:10
			Lilla. But prostrate yourself to
Allah, the One who created them.
		
00:39:11 --> 00:39:14
			So the rejoinder of the
polemicists is yeah, the Quran is
		
00:39:14 --> 00:39:19
			against the worship of the moon,
but commands the worship of the
		
00:39:19 --> 00:39:22
			moon god. But if you read the
Quran, just a second verse of the
		
00:39:22 --> 00:39:27
			Quran Al hamdu Lillahi Rabbil
Alameen. Please Praise be to Allah
		
00:39:27 --> 00:39:31
			Rabbul aalameen The Lord of the
universe and interestingly, this
		
00:39:31 --> 00:39:35
			is a title that the rabbi's use
for God in their writings, Bono
		
00:39:35 --> 00:39:40
			shell Olam, Bono shell Olam,
Rabbul aalameen, the God of the
		
00:39:40 --> 00:39:44
			universe. So yes, Allah is the God
of the moon. He's the god of the
		
00:39:44 --> 00:39:46
			sun. He's the God of the heavens
and the earth. He's the God of
		
00:39:46 --> 00:39:51
			humanity. If you read the Quran,
what does Allah say in the Quran
		
00:39:51 --> 00:39:52
			about himself?
		
00:39:53 --> 00:39:57
			I'll spare you the Arabic because
I don't want to take so much time
		
00:39:57 --> 00:39:58
			here. I'm running short on time.
		
00:39:59 --> 00:40:00
			God
		
00:40:00 --> 00:40:03
			There is no god but He, He sent
down to you oh Mohamed the
		
00:40:03 --> 00:40:07
			revelation in truth confirming
what was before it, once Allah
		
00:40:07 --> 00:40:11
			Torah to what injeel. And he sent
down or revealed the Torah and the
		
00:40:11 --> 00:40:16
			Gospel. So the cloud of the god of
the Quran is the God according to
		
00:40:16 --> 00:40:20
			the Quran, who gave or sent down
or revealed the Torah and the
		
00:40:20 --> 00:40:20
			Gospel.
		
00:40:22 --> 00:40:26
			Elsewhere in the Quran, say, oh
Mohammed, we believe in Allah in
		
00:40:26 --> 00:40:29
			God and what was revealed to us
and what was revealed to Abraham,
		
00:40:30 --> 00:40:34
			Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob and the
tribes, and what Moses and Jesus
		
00:40:34 --> 00:40:37
			were given, and the prophets from
their Lord, we don't make
		
00:40:37 --> 00:40:41
			distinctions between them, and we
bow down to God, elsewhere in the
		
00:40:41 --> 00:40:46
			Quran. And remember, when the
angel said, Oh, Mary, God gives
		
00:40:46 --> 00:40:49
			you glad tidings of a word from
him whose name shall be Christ
		
00:40:49 --> 00:40:53
			Jesus, the son of Mary held an
honor in this world, and in the
		
00:40:53 --> 00:40:56
			afterlife, and amongst those
nearest to God, according to the
		
00:40:56 --> 00:41:01
			Quran, the god of the Quran is the
God who sent the angel to marry to
		
00:41:01 --> 00:41:03
			give her glad tidings of the birth
of Christ.
		
00:41:05 --> 00:41:09
			If you read 280 to 189 of the
Quran, Surah Baqarah surah number
		
00:41:09 --> 00:41:15
			two, verse 189. Yes, Allah I need
a hint Allah. They ask you about
		
00:41:15 --> 00:41:19
			the new moons. Right? They're
asking you about the the new
		
00:41:19 --> 00:41:24
			moons, the crescent moons, quoted
here Milwaukee to the NASCI. While
		
00:41:24 --> 00:41:28
			Hodge they are simply say, oh,
Mohamed, they are simply tools for
		
00:41:28 --> 00:41:33
			telling time, and for determining
the season of the pilgrimage. And
		
00:41:33 --> 00:41:38
			that's it. And Jews use a lunar
calendar. In during the Temple
		
00:41:38 --> 00:41:41
			period, you had servants of the
Temple Guard go out to the Mount
		
00:41:41 --> 00:41:44
			of Olives site, the moon and burn
fires to let the people know that
		
00:41:44 --> 00:41:47
			it's like the moon. Right. But
what's up with the flag of
		
00:41:47 --> 00:41:48
			Pakistan?
		
00:41:50 --> 00:41:51
			So you have this
		
00:41:52 --> 00:41:53
			right?
		
00:41:54 --> 00:41:59
			symbol here. So and I don't mean
to pick on Pakistan, there's many.
		
00:42:00 --> 00:42:03
			There's many countries that have
this as on their flag. But you
		
00:42:03 --> 00:42:06
			know, this symbol is one of the
oldest icons in human history.
		
00:42:06 --> 00:42:11
			It's not Islamic in origin, nor is
it exclusive to Islam. The Prophet
		
00:42:11 --> 00:42:15
			Muhammad's flags are solid black
and white. There is no symbol that
		
00:42:15 --> 00:42:19
			he associated with Islam. The icon
entered Islamic culture via the
		
00:42:19 --> 00:42:24
			Seljuk Turks in the 12th century,
and was widely used by their
		
00:42:24 --> 00:42:28
			successors, the Ottomans, many,
many Muslim majority countries
		
00:42:28 --> 00:42:30
			adopted the icon.
		
00:42:31 --> 00:42:36
			Okay, now there's another Semitic
language called surah. Yeah, yeah.
		
00:42:36 --> 00:42:41
			Or Syriac. Late. It's sometimes
called late Aramaic or Christian.
		
00:42:41 --> 00:42:46
			Aramaic is the language of Christ,
according to many historians. Now
		
00:42:46 --> 00:42:49
			there's a translation of the New
Testament, which is called the
		
00:42:49 --> 00:42:50
			Peshitta.
		
00:42:51 --> 00:42:54
			Which related to the Arabic the
Sikh top simple.
		
00:42:55 --> 00:42:59
			This was done in the fourth
century. It's a translation of the
		
00:42:59 --> 00:43:03
			Greek manuscripts into Syriac, the
language of Christ, replacing
		
00:43:03 --> 00:43:08
			tations, a Diatessaron. That was
written in the second century. If
		
00:43:08 --> 00:43:13
			you look in the Peshitta, Mark,
chapter one, verse 15, according
		
00:43:13 --> 00:43:18
			to the Peshitta Jesus says,
shamanism Na, were Matea
		
00:43:18 --> 00:43:19
			Mallacoota Allah Aha.
		
00:43:20 --> 00:43:28
			He says The time is fulfilled, and
the kingdom of God is at hand. So
		
00:43:29 --> 00:43:31
			in the way that it's spelled in
Syriac
		
00:43:34 --> 00:43:34
			is
		
00:43:36 --> 00:43:43
			Alif Lam ha. Elif, right. And some
Syriac grammars, like Brah,
		
00:43:43 --> 00:43:47
			Coleman will, will argue that the
first lamb or the Lammott here
		
00:43:47 --> 00:43:49
			should be doubled. So you have
		
00:43:51 --> 00:43:57
			Hola Hola. Hola, ha, this is in
Syriac, in the 11th century of the
		
00:43:57 --> 00:44:02
			Common Era, a Christian scholar
named even Tayyab he translated
		
00:44:02 --> 00:44:07
			tations Diatessaron from the
original Syriac into Arabic and he
		
00:44:07 --> 00:44:08
			translated this word
		
00:44:10 --> 00:44:12
			into Arabic as this Allah
		
00:44:16 --> 00:44:22
			Now what is the trilateral route?
What is the meaning of Allah? So
		
00:44:22 --> 00:44:25
			there's there's some opinion about
this actually. Let me erase this
		
00:44:25 --> 00:44:26
			666 stuff here.
		
00:44:28 --> 00:44:33
			Somebody takes a picture of it and
calls me the Antichrist. Yes. So
		
00:44:33 --> 00:44:39
			one opinion is that the root is la
ha, la ha This is from Cebu away a
		
00:44:39 --> 00:44:41
			Persian or Marian anyway.
		
00:44:42 --> 00:44:47
			Inside joke between me and the
students. La ha. This This means
		
00:44:47 --> 00:44:53
			to shimmer are to to shine to
shimmer. That's the root meaning
		
00:44:53 --> 00:44:57
			of lucha as they be the intangible
arrows. He offers this alley ha.
		
00:44:59 --> 00:44:59
			Ali, ha
		
00:45:00 --> 00:45:05
			means to go back and forth in a
state of fear and perplexity.
		
00:45:07 --> 00:45:11
			That's what that root meaning is.
And this is supported by the BTB
		
00:45:12 --> 00:45:16
			the brown the brown driver Briggs,
Hebrew English
		
00:45:17 --> 00:45:22
			lexicon and they give the root as
the same letters I left la mud
		
00:45:22 --> 00:45:24
			Hey, hola, hola.
		
00:45:25 --> 00:45:34
			gesenius also gives this one ghoul
so Alif Wow lum in the meaning
		
00:45:34 --> 00:45:40
			here is power. This is related to
the Arabic Oh Walla Walla, Walla,
		
00:45:40 --> 00:45:44
			unformed to infinitive wheel, has
the meaning
		
00:45:46 --> 00:45:51
			of, of mystical exegesis. Right,
that's the technical meaning,
		
00:45:51 --> 00:45:55
			linguistically, it means to find
the origin of something. So this
		
00:45:55 --> 00:45:59
			idea that God is the ontological
origin of or source of all things
		
00:45:59 --> 00:46:03
			that he's mono rk is the first
principle of all existence.
		
00:46:07 --> 00:46:12
			Okay, so I want to look at a verse
in the Quran.
		
00:46:14 --> 00:46:15
			Really quickly here.
		
00:46:16 --> 00:46:20
			There's a surah. In the Quran, a
chapter called loss. It's also
		
00:46:20 --> 00:46:24
			called a SAS, it's called a
Tauheed. There's 18 to 22 names,
		
00:46:24 --> 00:46:27
			it's only four verses long. It is
the heart of Islamic theology.
		
00:46:28 --> 00:46:33
			Surah 112. Right. So 112 One, this
is what looks like
		
00:46:34 --> 00:46:35
			an Arabic
		
00:46:42 --> 00:46:44
			says call who Allah who hadn't?
		
00:46:46 --> 00:46:50
			Right. So call is an imperative to
the Prophet. And by extension to
		
00:46:50 --> 00:46:57
			all of us say he is God, one. So
grammarians, they try to identify
		
00:46:57 --> 00:46:59
			what's happening here
grammatically, say they say who
		
00:46:59 --> 00:47:04
			this is the subject. This is
called Muqtada. And here LeFou and
		
00:47:04 --> 00:47:09
			gelada, the expression of
excitation. This is the predicate
		
00:47:09 --> 00:47:11
			the hover and then I had, there's
an opinion that this is the
		
00:47:11 --> 00:47:16
			permutated and explanatory word of
some sort, or that this is a
		
00:47:16 --> 00:47:17
			second predicate.
		
00:47:19 --> 00:47:23
			So hold on to that for a minute.
I'll come back to it. Now, in the
		
00:47:23 --> 00:47:28
			Hebrew Bible, in the Tanakh, we
have something called the
		
00:47:28 --> 00:47:29
			tetragrammaton.
		
00:47:31 --> 00:47:36
			Right? the tetragrammaton means
four letter word. Yard. Hey, Vav.
		
00:47:36 --> 00:47:42
			Hey, yard, hey, Vav Hey. So like,
why W?
		
00:47:44 --> 00:47:46
			These four Hebrew letters.
		
00:47:47 --> 00:47:51
			And these letters represent the
name of God. No one knows how to
		
00:47:51 --> 00:47:55
			articulate these letters the high
priest did on Yom Kippur war.
		
00:47:56 --> 00:47:59
			The early church fathers have
conjectured and I apologize for
		
00:47:59 --> 00:48:03
			this. Yeah, way. But this is
conjecture. There is something
		
00:48:05 --> 00:48:08
			somewhat similar to this in the
Quran. There's some of the
		
00:48:08 --> 00:48:11
			chapters of the Quran at the very
beginning. There are these
		
00:48:11 --> 00:48:14
			mysterious disjointed letters as
they're called. And if Lam Meem
		
00:48:15 --> 00:48:20
			hammy Yacine ta Cafe are inside.
Nobody really knows what these
		
00:48:20 --> 00:48:23
			means. Now, there's some mystical
exigence who will conjecture
		
00:48:23 --> 00:48:27
			things but they always say Allahu
Allah, God knows. Like a bit. He
		
00:48:27 --> 00:48:31
			was said, Hi, meet him, Ya Habibi,
Mohammed. Right? Ha ha one of the
		
00:48:31 --> 00:48:35
			names of the Prophet Yacine Yes,
Sayed. Yes, say a Jaffa saw that,
		
00:48:35 --> 00:48:38
			but nobody really knows. Right? Of
course Western oriental is
		
00:48:38 --> 00:48:41
			believed these are the initials of
the scribes that are really into
		
00:48:41 --> 00:48:45
			writing the Koran. But here's the
thing, if you read the Hebrew
		
00:48:45 --> 00:48:51
			Bible, so the Shema, right, the
great justification of of Jewish
		
00:48:51 --> 00:48:55
			faith or theology, Deuteronomy six
for Shema Israel,
		
00:48:56 --> 00:48:58
			then you have yard Hey vav Hey
		
00:49:11 --> 00:49:13
			so here we have the
tetragrammaton. Here we have the
		
00:49:13 --> 00:49:19
			tetragrammaton, right? But Jewish
scribes are not allowed to
		
00:49:19 --> 00:49:23
			articulate this. It's the Shem
Hama for OSH it's the name that's
		
00:49:23 --> 00:49:28
			not to be articulated. It's Hashem
the name the great name. So
		
00:49:28 --> 00:49:29
			instead of saying
		
00:49:31 --> 00:49:34
			Yahweh way or something again, I
apologize or something like that.
		
00:49:34 --> 00:49:36
			They will say I don't I
		
00:49:42 --> 00:49:44
			don't I do oops.
		
00:49:45 --> 00:49:50
			I don't know what the comments
here right? I don't I ELO Hey, no,
		
00:49:50 --> 00:49:55
			I don't I hard Adonai Eloheinu
Adonai. Interestingly, in the
		
00:49:55 --> 00:50:00
			Gospel of Mark, and Jewish scribe
comes to Christ. And he says what
		
00:50:00 --> 00:50:03
			is a greatest commandment. And
Mark has him say, quote The
		
00:50:03 --> 00:50:07
			Septuagint right the Greek
translation of the Hebrew Bible
		
00:50:07 --> 00:50:12
			Akua. You said I am here Israel
kudos Hafez Heyman, quote, EOS
		
00:50:12 --> 00:50:18
			haste estin here, O Israel, the
LORD our God, the Lord is one. So
		
00:50:19 --> 00:50:20
			the Hebrew
		
00:50:21 --> 00:50:23
			and erase this part here.
		
00:50:24 --> 00:50:29
			The Hebrew word, the Hebrew
tetragrammaton yd haev off, hey,
		
00:50:29 --> 00:50:30
			it's translated
		
00:50:31 --> 00:50:32
			oops
		
00:50:36 --> 00:50:37
			is translated
		
00:50:40 --> 00:50:43
			as kudos in Greek
		
00:50:46 --> 00:50:52
			kudos in the LXX in the Greek
Septuagint, as well as the New
		
00:50:52 --> 00:50:55
			Testament. But here's the thing
about the Greek kudos. Kudos can
		
00:50:55 --> 00:51:01
			also mean teacher or rabbi, or
master in fact, in the Gospel of
		
00:51:01 --> 00:51:06
			John Philip is called kudos. So
while the tetragrammaton only
		
00:51:06 --> 00:51:11
			refers to God, kudos can actually
refer to human beings as well.
		
00:51:15 --> 00:51:16
			And then Elohim
		
00:51:19 --> 00:51:27
			Elohim is rendered half Baos in
Greek ha fails
		
00:51:28 --> 00:51:34
			with the definite article, right?
But the word fails
		
00:51:35 --> 00:51:36
			without the definite article,
		
00:51:38 --> 00:51:43
			right? Northcrest or Nikita?
Indefinite is also used for non
		
00:51:43 --> 00:51:49
			deities. Right? I would argue
that, you know, because John, the
		
00:51:49 --> 00:51:53
			Gospel of John calls Jesus famous
without the definite article,
		
00:51:53 --> 00:51:57
			Jesus has not called Hot chaos in
any gospel. He's called famous.
		
00:51:57 --> 00:52:03
			Interestingly, Philo obviously,
not a biblical writer, but Philo,
		
00:52:03 --> 00:52:06
			in the life of Moses, a
contemporary of the Gospel of
		
00:52:06 --> 00:52:14
			John, he calls Moses face EOS.
Right. Paul calls Satan, Fayyaz,
		
00:52:14 --> 00:52:18
			the god of this world. So non
deities, I'll come back to this
		
00:52:18 --> 00:52:22
			idea. But if we look at the
tetragrammaton here,
		
00:52:24 --> 00:52:25
			your table of hey,
		
00:52:26 --> 00:52:29
			my contention is that it's
probably derived from
		
00:52:31 --> 00:52:37
			this very archaic verb Hava have
our means to be
		
00:52:38 --> 00:52:44
			to be. So then this looks like
it's the if we add vowels, it
		
00:52:44 --> 00:52:49
			looks like it's the imperfect
tense. Yeah, there. Yeah, there,
		
00:52:49 --> 00:52:54
			which means he is or he will be
right.
		
00:52:56 --> 00:52:56
			Now,
		
00:52:58 --> 00:53:03
			the Arabic cognate, to hover,
according to gesenius is how we
		
00:53:04 --> 00:53:08
			are how we are, however, meaning
to breathe, how we are meaning to
		
00:53:08 --> 00:53:13
			love or to desire or to will. This
idea that God is the breath of
		
00:53:13 --> 00:53:19
			existence, he will to create out
of a demonstration of His love. So
		
00:53:20 --> 00:53:23
			yeah, yeah. So here we have the
		
00:53:24 --> 00:53:31
			prominent letters. Hey, in volve.
Interestingly, in other places in
		
00:53:31 --> 00:53:32
			the Hebrew Bible,
		
00:53:33 --> 00:53:38
			a shorter form of the
tetragrammaton is used with only
		
00:53:38 --> 00:53:39
			these two letters
		
00:53:41 --> 00:53:44
			as either whole, or who.
		
00:53:46 --> 00:53:48
			So like the Hebrew name of Jesus
		
00:53:53 --> 00:53:56
			translated Jeshua
		
00:53:58 --> 00:53:59
			Yahoshua
		
00:54:01 --> 00:54:07
			Yahoshua Jeshua, which is rendered
in the Greek as none other than EA
		
00:54:07 --> 00:54:09
			Seuss, which is what Jesus has
called the New Testament.
		
00:54:11 --> 00:54:16
			The meaning of this according to
gesenius is saved by hole.
		
00:54:17 --> 00:54:21
			Hole, right, the name of one of
the names of God, a shortened form
		
00:54:22 --> 00:54:25
			of the tetragrammaton and of
course, I wrote these two letters
		
00:54:26 --> 00:54:27
			in Arabic.
		
00:54:28 --> 00:54:32
			You get this Ha, wow. Hua
		
00:54:33 --> 00:54:34
			Hua,
		
00:54:35 --> 00:54:42
			to come back to this idea. Now, as
I said, Hava is very old. There's
		
00:54:42 --> 00:54:45
			a later form of the verb to be
that's attested in the Hebrew
		
00:54:45 --> 00:54:50
			Bible as well. Which is Hi yah,
with the Yoda in the middle. Hi,
		
00:54:50 --> 00:54:54
			yah. Hi Yah, so Hava Hi yah.
		
00:54:56 --> 00:54:57
			And
		
00:55:01 --> 00:55:04
			The third masculine singular
present tense
		
00:55:07 --> 00:55:13
			would be Yeah, yeah. Which means
he is or will be. Now, if I wanted
		
00:55:13 --> 00:55:18
			to change this to first common
singular, what would I have to
		
00:55:18 --> 00:55:24
			change is the same in Arabic. So
if this is your Kuno yaku he will
		
00:55:24 --> 00:55:26
			be how do I say I will be?
		
00:55:27 --> 00:55:28
			Huh?
		
00:55:29 --> 00:55:30
			Okay.
		
00:55:31 --> 00:55:37
			Cool. No, I have to change the
prefix right. To what
		
00:55:39 --> 00:55:39
			and Elif
		
00:55:41 --> 00:55:42
			and Elif.
		
00:55:43 --> 00:55:45
			Yay, I am
		
00:55:47 --> 00:55:54
			a Yay. I am I will be. Now if you
look at Exodus 314 In the Torah,
		
00:55:55 --> 00:55:58
			Moses at the burning bush, he's
speaking to God and He says, you
		
00:55:58 --> 00:56:00
			know, when I go back to the
Israelites, they're gonna ask me,
		
00:56:01 --> 00:56:06
			What is your name? What do I say?
And God says to him, tell them
		
00:56:06 --> 00:56:14
			hey, Asha AE, I am who I am. I
will be who I will be. Now this
		
00:56:14 --> 00:56:18
			was translated in the Septuagint
as a goal
		
00:56:19 --> 00:56:20
			AMI
		
00:56:21 --> 00:56:22
			Hold on.
		
00:56:25 --> 00:56:29
			The Septuagint translated to 50
before the Common Era, by 70 Greek
		
00:56:29 --> 00:56:36
			speaking Hebrew scholars, they
translated a Asha AE as a goal a
		
00:56:36 --> 00:56:37
			me a goal.
		
00:56:39 --> 00:56:44
			How do you write an English Ami?
Hold on?
		
00:56:45 --> 00:56:47
			Yes, so here we have
		
00:56:48 --> 00:56:52
			a goal is the subject AMI is the
copula to verb the linking verb
		
00:56:52 --> 00:56:57
			our predicate is Hold on, this is
our predicate. Our predicate Hold
		
00:56:57 --> 00:57:02
			on This is the masculine definite
article in the present active
		
00:57:03 --> 00:57:10
			participle on right. Like the word
ontology is related to this. I am
		
00:57:10 --> 00:57:15
			the one who is that's how they
understood it. I am the one who is
		
00:57:15 --> 00:57:19
			the one whose existence is
absolutely necessary. The only non
		
00:57:19 --> 00:57:24
			contingent being watchable would
include the monarch the first
		
00:57:24 --> 00:57:27
			cause of all, so for Philo,
		
00:57:29 --> 00:57:34
			for Philo, hold on is the name of
God. In Greek, this is the
		
00:57:34 --> 00:57:42
			equivalent, right? Of the Hashem
who on the one who is he calls
		
00:57:42 --> 00:57:43
			Moses they OS
		
00:57:44 --> 00:57:45
			right? Say OS
		
00:57:47 --> 00:57:54
			which means a god. But Philo is
not a polytheist. Right? What does
		
00:57:54 --> 00:58:00
			he mean by that? He means a Moses
is a sanctified, divine agent of
		
00:58:00 --> 00:58:05
			God in union with God, a divine
with a lowercase d. That's how
		
00:58:05 --> 00:58:09
			he's using it. Now for John, the
Gospel of John. My contention is
		
00:58:09 --> 00:58:14
			my dissertation work was on the
Gospel of John files contemporary.
		
00:58:15 --> 00:58:20
			The father is Hans AOSS. The
father is half a author with a
		
00:58:20 --> 00:58:25
			definite article, and Jesus is
called theists. But I would also
		
00:58:25 --> 00:58:29
			contend that the way that John is
using, I'm doing a lot of pure
		
00:58:29 --> 00:58:33
			wetter, the way that John is using
Fayol is not so dissimilar as to
		
00:58:33 --> 00:58:39
			how Philo is calling Moses, Say
us, that Jesus that Christ is a
		
00:58:39 --> 00:58:44
			sanctified divine agent of God and
mystical union with God. Now, if
		
00:58:44 --> 00:58:48
			you look at and Jesus's in the
sun, or Jesus, or Christ is never
		
00:58:48 --> 00:58:51
			called half AOSS anywhere in the
four gospels. Right now, if you
		
00:58:51 --> 00:58:55
			look at the end of the prologue,
John 118. John 118
		
00:58:57 --> 00:59:02
			is a beautiful verse. It says no
one has at any time seen God.
		
00:59:04 --> 00:59:09
			No one has at any time seen God,
but the mono
		
00:59:10 --> 00:59:11
			game as
		
00:59:12 --> 00:59:13
			fate EOS
		
00:59:15 --> 00:59:16
			Alright, so mono
		
00:59:18 --> 00:59:23
			kinase, Fe OS. Sometimes this is
erroneously translate, I would say
		
00:59:23 --> 00:59:28
			it's erroneously translated as the
only begotten God. Sometimes this
		
00:59:28 --> 00:59:32
			word says we OS in Greek, the only
begotten Son, but se os is
		
00:59:32 --> 00:59:38
			actually better attested in the
manuscripts. So the the Codex
		
00:59:38 --> 00:59:43
			Vaticanus, which will teach about
love so much, the Codex Sinaiticus
		
00:59:43 --> 00:59:48
			and p 66. Nestle aland 27th
edition UBS fourth edition, they
		
00:59:48 --> 00:59:53
			all took mono again as they EOS
mono Guinness, one of a kind
		
00:59:53 --> 00:59:59
			divinized agent of God. No one has
at any time, seen God
		
01:00:00 --> 01:00:06
			But a very uniquely divinized
lowercase d, Agent of God who is
		
01:00:06 --> 01:00:11
			in the calapan to Theo Kalpana to
path through who is in the bosom
		
01:00:11 --> 01:00:15
			of the Father in the heart of the
Father. That is to say, who is
		
01:00:15 --> 01:00:19
			beloved to the Father XA gay Sato
EXA. G Tim
		
01:00:21 --> 01:00:24
			speaks about him, makes you
familiar with him gives you
		
01:00:24 --> 01:00:28
			mattify of him, the highest type
of knowledge is Dattilo him
		
01:00:28 --> 01:00:33
			modified to Allah. Jesus quotes
Hosea and Matthew Keith, that's
		
01:00:33 --> 01:00:39
			the facet veloza But that Elohim
May Allah I require said mercy
		
01:00:39 --> 01:00:43
			love not sacrifice and the
knowledge of God dot Elohim Mati
		
01:00:43 --> 01:00:46
			Fatah Allah more than burn
offerings
		
01:00:49 --> 01:00:50
			now John 1030
		
01:00:52 --> 01:00:54
			Jesus says egg okay hot potato
Hain Essman
		
01:00:56 --> 01:01:01
			he says I and the Father are one.
This very interesting passage
		
01:01:01 --> 01:01:05
			here. No my favorite passages. So
the Pharisees the pickup stones.
		
01:01:05 --> 01:01:08
			And so why you stoning me for
which work that I've shown you
		
01:01:08 --> 01:01:10
			from the fathers and not for my
work is because you're of
		
01:01:10 --> 01:01:14
			blasphemy, you're claiming to be
God, Jesus's response very
		
01:01:14 --> 01:01:17
			interesting here. He says, does it
not say in your scripture I said
		
01:01:17 --> 01:01:23
			you are Gods all sons of the Most
High. quoting Psalm 82. Six,
		
01:01:23 --> 01:01:29
			doesn't it say in your scripture?
A low him at Tim, you are Elohim.
		
01:01:30 --> 01:01:33
			God calls the judges who are
prophetic figures in the Old
		
01:01:33 --> 01:01:39
			Testament in the Tanakh gods for
B'nai la Yan, cool, let him all of
		
01:01:39 --> 01:01:43
			you are sons of the Most High says
yet you say of the one whom the
		
01:01:43 --> 01:01:48
			Father sanctified and sent into
the world, you blaspheme, because
		
01:01:48 --> 01:01:52
			I said, I am the Son of God.
Right? So the point here is an Old
		
01:01:52 --> 01:01:57
			Testament, human beings in the
Tanakh, human beings, as well as
		
01:01:57 --> 01:01:59
			God are called Gods.
		
01:02:00 --> 01:02:06
			In Exodus seven one, right, I will
send you God speaking to Moses, I
		
01:02:06 --> 01:02:11
			will send you as Elohim unto pada
o to Pharaoh, and Aaron as your
		
01:02:11 --> 01:02:16
			prophet, doesn't mean, Moses is
literally God but a representative
		
01:02:16 --> 01:02:19
			of God, a divine agent, one who
speaks with the authority of God
		
01:02:20 --> 01:02:23
			on who acts with the authority of
God. This type of mystical union
		
01:02:23 --> 01:02:29
			that I believe is in the Quran, my
UGR Rasool, Allah, Allah, whoever
		
01:02:29 --> 01:02:33
			obeys the messenger is obeying
God. Why? Because they're the same
		
01:02:33 --> 01:02:37
			note because the messenger speaks
with the authority of God. And
		
01:02:37 --> 01:02:42
			disobedience of him is as is the
same as disobedience to God. And
		
01:02:42 --> 01:02:46
			interestingly, the rabbi's also
referred to God as Father, this is
		
01:02:46 --> 01:02:49
			a Hebrew Hizam Isaiah 64 Eight.
		
01:02:50 --> 01:02:51
			They say,
		
01:02:52 --> 01:02:58
			at Adonai a vino. You are the Lord
our father. I would contend that
		
01:02:58 --> 01:02:59
			this idea
		
01:03:00 --> 01:03:05
			right in in biblical text of God
being a father, an OB, is
		
01:03:05 --> 01:03:08
			confirmed the concept of it, I
would contend is confirmed in the
		
01:03:08 --> 01:03:14
			Quran without using the language
of father that rub the word Rob in
		
01:03:14 --> 01:03:17
			the Quran is equivalent to how I
believe the Bible is using Old and
		
01:03:17 --> 01:03:21
			New Testament. How the Bible is
using father, who is your rub.
		
01:03:22 --> 01:03:25
			Your rub is the one who brings you
up, raises you up takes care of
		
01:03:25 --> 01:03:29
			you, takes you takes care of you
raises you up in stages. This is
		
01:03:29 --> 01:03:35
			the meaning of rub. It denotes
God's eminence, his Korb right
		
01:03:35 --> 01:03:37
			that's what we pray in the Quran.
There's a there's a there's a
		
01:03:37 --> 01:03:41
			supplication that God teaches us
to say in the Quran to about our
		
01:03:41 --> 01:03:41
			parents.
		
01:03:43 --> 01:03:49
			It ham Houma have mercy on them
Come on Rob by Yanni Savera. As
		
01:03:49 --> 01:03:54
			they raised me up in childhood, as
they raised me up in childhood, or
		
01:03:54 --> 01:03:58
			up by Jani, Sophia Saphira. So
look at these major prophets of
		
01:03:58 --> 01:04:03
			God, the Prophet Muhammad, the
Prophet Jesus, the prophet Moses,
		
01:04:03 --> 01:04:07
			the Prophet Abraham, none of these
great prophetic figures had their,
		
01:04:07 --> 01:04:12
			their biological fathers in their
lives. They have what's known as
		
01:04:12 --> 01:04:17
			tarbiyah, rub Baniya they have a
lordly upbringing. It's only in
		
01:04:17 --> 01:04:24
			this, this majaz this figurative
way that these are quote unquote
		
01:04:24 --> 01:04:28
			sons of God. I think that's how
the Bible is using the term.
		
01:04:28 --> 01:04:29
			Interestingly,
		
01:04:30 --> 01:04:31
			if you
		
01:04:35 --> 01:04:40
			and also the Rabbi say, a vino
Shiva shamayim. They mentioned Our
		
01:04:40 --> 01:04:42
			Father who art in heaven.
		
01:04:43 --> 01:04:47
			This is a Hebrew ism, it's found
in rabbinical literature, of wound
		
01:04:47 --> 01:04:50
			of Ishmael Christ says, and
especially to our Father who art
		
01:04:50 --> 01:04:56
			in heaven. Also the phrase Son of
God is a Hebrew ism. A son in the
		
01:04:56 --> 01:04:59
			Jewish context, is a servant of
God par excellence.
		
01:05:00 --> 01:05:05
			In the Torah, Israel is my son,
even my firstborn. God says to
		
01:05:05 --> 01:05:08
			David in the Psalms, you are my
son this day I have begotten you.
		
01:05:09 --> 01:05:14
			Paul says in Romans four as many
as are led by the Spirit of God,
		
01:05:14 --> 01:05:19
			these are the boy to fail. These
are the sons or children of God.
		
01:05:20 --> 01:05:23
			It says in the prologue, Jesus
gave them authority to be taken
		
01:05:23 --> 01:05:28
			out to throw you, children of God.
Interestingly, the Quran quotes
		
01:05:28 --> 01:05:33
			Jesus the Quran says here so that
Imran never would someone that God
		
01:05:33 --> 01:05:37
			gave the prophetic office, say to
humanity Coonoor a bad day Leeming
		
01:05:37 --> 01:05:41
			doing Allah, they would never say
humanity be my worshipers other
		
01:05:41 --> 01:05:49
			than God. Well, I can Qunu Rabbani
Yin, but be lordly Rabbani Yean,
		
01:05:49 --> 01:05:55
			be lordly be reflections of God,
your rub rub is equivalent to
		
01:05:55 --> 01:06:00
			Father up in the Bible. Someone
who has Rabbani is quote unquote,
		
01:06:00 --> 01:06:04
			a child of God. That's how the
term is used, I believe in
		
01:06:04 --> 01:06:09
			biblical text. And in John the
phrase, the Son of God, who used
		
01:06:09 --> 01:06:14
			to fail, I would say is clearly a
messianic title, a uniquely
		
01:06:14 --> 01:06:16
			divinized son.
		
01:06:17 --> 01:06:22
			Now, according to the Mishnah, the
Shem, Hama frosh, the
		
01:06:22 --> 01:06:25
			tetragrammaton was only
articulated in the temple, the
		
01:06:25 --> 01:06:31
			Beit Mikdash by the haka Hain
Hagadol, the high priest, and it
		
01:06:31 --> 01:06:35
			was believed to be the most
exalted name of God, the actual
		
01:06:35 --> 01:06:39
			name of his essence, right in
distinction to Elohim which
		
01:06:39 --> 01:06:44
			indicates is essence Allah, Allah
Moon Allah that right, a proper
		
01:06:44 --> 01:06:49
			name indicating the essence, Imam
followed in a Razzie, one of the
		
01:06:49 --> 01:06:53
			great exegesis and philosophers in
our tradition. He said that the
		
01:06:53 --> 01:06:57
			IsaMill of them the greatest name
of God, is this.
		
01:06:59 --> 01:06:59
			Hua
		
01:07:01 --> 01:07:01
			Hua
		
01:07:03 --> 01:07:08
			right, containing the prominent
letters of the tetragrammaton
		
01:07:09 --> 01:07:14
			the Hey, with a Ha, in the Wow,
the very name of God's essence,
		
01:07:15 --> 01:07:16
			even Oribi the great master
		
01:07:18 --> 01:07:21
			he said, Ha hoot.
		
01:07:25 --> 01:07:26
			Ha hoot.
		
01:07:28 --> 01:07:32
			So here we have the prominent
letters. Hua. The Rabbi's also
		
01:07:32 --> 01:07:34
			mentioned Ma
		
01:07:37 --> 01:07:43
			Ma hoot. With the prominent
letters Hey, involve
		
01:07:48 --> 01:07:53
			so I would contend then, back to
this here, all who Allahu Ahad
		
01:07:55 --> 01:07:59
			I would contend that what's
happening here because if you look
		
01:07:59 --> 01:08:01
			at the ASVAB and Newzoo, if you
look at the occasion of this
		
01:08:02 --> 01:08:05
			Surahs revelation, like you look
at Anwar ad, for example, he gives
		
01:08:05 --> 01:08:10
			two occasions once in Mecca where
polytheists are asking the Prophet
		
01:08:10 --> 01:08:15
			about God once in Medina when Jews
are asking about God when Jews so
		
01:08:15 --> 01:08:22
			the response come say Hua is God I
had, who? I would say, God, hey,
		
01:08:23 --> 01:08:27
			Vav Hey, is a confirmation of the
tetragrammaton who was the name of
		
01:08:27 --> 01:08:31
			his essence, the greatest name?
Who and then Allah is equivalent
		
01:08:31 --> 01:08:32
			to
		
01:08:34 --> 01:08:41
			eloheinu and if this is a second
predicate, right as CLT says, then
		
01:08:41 --> 01:08:45
			you have this parenthetical yard
Hey, vave again, who are
		
01:08:48 --> 01:08:49
			a hard
		
01:08:50 --> 01:08:56
			Adonai Eloheinu Adonai Johan who
Allah who had a perfect
		
01:08:56 --> 01:09:01
			confirmation, of the principle,
theological teaching of the Torah,
		
01:09:03 --> 01:09:09
			want to end with this? What is the
personality of this God of Allah?
		
01:09:10 --> 01:09:14
			According to the Quran, according
to Islam? What is the overarching
		
01:09:14 --> 01:09:21
			personality trait of this god? 113
out of 114 Sutras of the Quran,
		
01:09:22 --> 01:09:27
			begin with this concept oratory
formula the sacred formula
		
01:09:27 --> 01:09:32
			Bismillah R Rahman r Rahim. Right.
This called the best smeller
		
01:09:32 --> 01:09:36
			Bismillah R Rahman r Rahim in the
name of God or rough man, the
		
01:09:36 --> 01:09:43
			indiscriminately compassionate, or
Rahim, the intimately loving. A
		
01:09:43 --> 01:09:46
			rough man is also mentioned in
rabbinical literature. Ha ha man,
		
01:09:46 --> 01:09:51
			ha ha man. And this word is
actually related to the word that
		
01:09:51 --> 01:09:56
			I am Russian ROM in Arabic and
Hebrew, which is the womb of a
		
01:09:56 --> 01:09:56
			mother.
		
01:09:57 --> 01:10:00
			Right? There's a hadith of the
poor
		
01:10:00 --> 01:10:02
			If it was mentioned in different
books, we also saw leafing Imam
		
01:10:02 --> 01:10:06
			nawawi, where the prophet was
outside standing with some of his
		
01:10:06 --> 01:10:08
			companions and a woman came
running out of her house and she
		
01:10:08 --> 01:10:12
			was totally hysterical. And said,
What's the matter? I lost my son.
		
01:10:12 --> 01:10:17
			My son is barely able to walk.
Where's my son? Look for her son.
		
01:10:17 --> 01:10:20
			She's absolutely hysterical. They
find her son, right? They give the
		
01:10:20 --> 01:10:24
			give her son to her. She takes her
son hugs kisses and breastfeed
		
01:10:24 --> 01:10:28
			him. Right? The Prophet said to
his companions that are there. Can
		
01:10:28 --> 01:10:33
			you imagine this woman taking her
son and throwing him into a fire?
		
01:10:34 --> 01:10:39
			Can you imagine that? They said,
la Wallahi by God, we can't. And
		
01:10:39 --> 01:10:43
			he said Allah who are humblebee
everybody he mean had the heebie
		
01:10:43 --> 01:10:51
			Wallah De ha. God, Allah Elohim is
more merciful to His servants than
		
01:10:51 --> 01:10:53
			this woman is to her son.
		
01:10:55 --> 01:10:58
			Children are taught what's known
as the hadith of Rama. In
		
01:10:58 --> 01:11:01
			traditional curricula children
five years old. This is the first
		
01:11:01 --> 01:11:04
			Hadith they learn the first
statement of the Prophet Muhammad
		
01:11:04 --> 01:11:08
			they learned is called the Hadith
the tradition of compassion. Or
		
01:11:08 --> 01:11:11
			Rafi Munna Your humble Homer
Rahman era hammelmann Fill out
		
01:11:11 --> 01:11:13
			your hammock command for sama
moose, not Achmed.
		
01:11:14 --> 01:11:19
			The most compassionate shows
compassion to those who show
		
01:11:19 --> 01:11:22
			compassion, show compassion to
those on earth and the one in
		
01:11:22 --> 01:11:25
			heaven will show you compassion,
compassion, compassion,
		
01:11:25 --> 01:11:29
			compassion, compassion, compassion
Bahama. This was chosen by
		
01:11:29 --> 01:11:33
			traditional aroma scholars as the
first Hadith to teach children to
		
01:11:33 --> 01:11:36
			drill into their minds. That
compassion is a great, great
		
01:11:36 --> 01:11:42
			virtue, that this is the greatest
virtue in the Islamic tradition.
		
01:11:44 --> 01:11:47
			The Quran says what Amati what's
the adequate Lashay my compassion
		
01:11:47 --> 01:11:53
			covers everything. Some of the
names of God, I look for the most
		
01:11:53 --> 01:11:59
			forgiving I love dude, the most
loving, A salaam peace. My monitor
		
01:11:59 --> 01:12:02
			is also confirmed has Shalom. One
of the names of God is has Shalom
		
01:12:02 --> 01:12:05
			he says in missional Torah. He
says it's forbidden to use this
		
01:12:05 --> 01:12:08
			word as a greeting if you're in a
bathhouse, because it's one of the
		
01:12:08 --> 01:12:09
			names of God.
		
01:12:10 --> 01:12:14
			The famous hadith of Sandman, the
person
		
01:12:15 --> 01:12:19
			who said that the Prophet Muhammad
said God divided his mercy into
		
01:12:19 --> 01:12:24
			100 equal parts. He took one part
out of 101% and he put it in
		
01:12:24 --> 01:12:29
			creation. And it's through. Its
through this one part of His
		
01:12:29 --> 01:12:33
			mercy, that all of creation shows
compassion towards one another.
		
01:12:33 --> 01:12:37
			And he's reserved 99 parts of his
mercy for the Yama Yama, Yama,
		
01:12:37 --> 01:12:40
			Dean Yom had Dean the Day of
Judgment.
		
01:12:43 --> 01:12:47
			The Prophet said, lead Ted, hello,
Jana, to Hatha Tumino wala took me
		
01:12:47 --> 01:12:52
			know how to have boo. None of you
will enter paradise until you
		
01:12:52 --> 01:12:55
			truly believe and none of you will
truly believe until you love one
		
01:12:55 --> 01:12:59
			another. Love one another.
Somebody I quoted this one time
		
01:12:59 --> 01:13:04
			and somebody said yeah, that's,
that's John 15. Right? Yeah. There
		
01:13:04 --> 01:13:06
			was something like that. And John
15, but I'm quoting from the
		
01:13:06 --> 01:13:09
			Prophet Muhammad peace be upon
him. Oh, really? He said, done.
		
01:13:09 --> 01:13:13
			Yeah. And then he said, Shall I
tell you of something that if you
		
01:13:13 --> 01:13:17
			do it, it will increase love? And
they said yes. So I've sure Salama
		
01:13:17 --> 01:13:19
			Boehner. Come spread peace amongst
yourselves.
		
01:13:20 --> 01:13:23
			Let me know I had to come after
you. Hey, buddy. Happy May you
		
01:13:23 --> 01:13:26
			rebel enough, see, oh, come akala
here salatu wa sallam. He also
		
01:13:26 --> 01:13:30
			said these are rigorously
authenticated traditions. None of
		
01:13:30 --> 01:13:35
			you truly believe until he loves
for his brother what he loves for
		
01:13:35 --> 01:13:39
			himself. And then one of the
companions said while I love my
		
01:13:39 --> 01:13:44
			there's my brother. I love him. I
love him. And he said the Prophet
		
01:13:44 --> 01:13:48
			said no, I don't mean your Muslim
brother. And your I mean your
		
01:13:48 --> 01:13:51
			brother or sister because the
masculine gender encapsulates the
		
01:13:51 --> 01:13:57
			fifth female gender, brother or
sister in Benny Adam, in the
		
01:13:57 --> 01:14:00
			Children of Adam, in humanity.
		
01:14:01 --> 01:14:01
			Alright.
		
01:14:05 --> 01:14:09
			So I'll end with this, I promise.
The heart of the Abrahamic
		
01:14:09 --> 01:14:09
			tradition
		
01:14:11 --> 01:14:15
			is summed up by Rabbi Hillel in
the second century is Deuteronomy
		
01:14:15 --> 01:14:20
			six four, which is this, the next
verse six, five, live Leviticus
		
01:14:20 --> 01:14:23
			1918 Schmeisser, Dona Elhanan,
		
01:14:24 --> 01:14:29
			there are Haftar at Adonai ILAHA
Bikol Lavaca over coldenhoff shefa
		
01:14:29 --> 01:14:32
			will be called may or DACA. Here
Israel the Lord our God the Lord
		
01:14:32 --> 01:14:35
			is one and you shall love the Lord
thy God, with all thy heart, soul
		
01:14:35 --> 01:14:37
			and strength and love your
neighbor as yourself neighbor
		
01:14:37 --> 01:14:41
			means your fellow man in the
generic sense. Jesus confirms
		
01:14:41 --> 01:14:45
			this. In that passage, and Mark no
other commandment is greater than
		
01:14:45 --> 01:14:49
			these to follow Dino Rossi. He
said. They asked him What is
		
01:14:49 --> 01:14:53
			Islam? Because they asked Rabbi
Hillel, what is the torah and he
		
01:14:53 --> 01:14:55
			quoted these three verses. He said
everything else is commentary.
		
01:14:56 --> 01:14:59
			What is Islam? Right? Rossi said I
		
01:15:00 --> 01:15:00
			Islam
		
01:15:02 --> 01:15:04
			and a banda to lil Holic
Warahmatullah
		
01:15:05 --> 01:15:08
			is worship of the Creator and
showing compassion towards his
		
01:15:08 --> 01:15:09
			creation.
		
01:15:10 --> 01:15:16
			This is the personality of Allah
subhanaw taala, as I understand
		
01:15:16 --> 01:15:19
			it, and the vast, vast majority of
Muslims understand it in the
		
01:15:19 --> 01:15:23
			Quran. Thank you very much for
patience. We'll take some
		
01:15:23 --> 01:15:25
			questions. I guess it's and I'm on
a camera what
		
01:15:34 --> 01:15:37
			you meant when you mentioned the
personality of God had made me
		
01:15:37 --> 01:15:40
			think a little bit about the
controversy that happened recently
		
01:15:40 --> 01:15:43
			that I thought you might work into
your thought, but you didn't,
		
01:15:43 --> 01:15:45
			which is the Wheaton College
controversy,
		
01:15:47 --> 01:15:51
			which also touched upon, is it the
same God? And there was the issue
		
01:15:51 --> 01:15:55
			of the Trinity and stuff. So can
you give us a quick take your take
		
01:15:55 --> 01:15:59
			on that controversy? And what that
would? Yeah. How you would address
		
01:15:59 --> 01:16:03
			that? Yeah, so it's a difficult
question. Do Muslims and
		
01:16:03 --> 01:16:06
			Christians worship the same God?
Again, in principle, she's talking
		
01:16:06 --> 01:16:10
			about us if you're talking about
Dr. Hawkins, right. at Wheaton
		
01:16:10 --> 01:16:13
			College, he was terminated from
her position because she dared to
		
01:16:13 --> 01:16:17
			say Muslims and Christians worship
the same God. I would say yes,
		
01:16:17 --> 01:16:19
			they do worship the same God. In
principle that is the same God.
		
01:16:20 --> 01:16:23
			But there are differences in
theology, obviously. So Muslims
		
01:16:23 --> 01:16:27
			don't believe in the Trinity.
Right? At least how the vast
		
01:16:27 --> 01:16:30
			majority of Muslims read the
Quran, there is a
		
01:16:31 --> 01:16:36
			a polemical aspect when it comes
to Orthodox Christian theology.
		
01:16:37 --> 01:16:41
			For example, in Surah, four verse
171, well, that's a Kulu Thalassa
		
01:16:41 --> 01:16:46
			don't say three until later lakum
desist, it is better for you. In
		
01:16:46 --> 01:16:51
			them, Allahu Allahu Anhu ahead,
for your God is one God. And
		
01:16:51 --> 01:16:53
			interestingly, here in this verse,
the word wide is used and not I
		
01:16:53 --> 01:16:58
			had, I would contend why it
denotes God's internal oneness,
		
01:16:58 --> 01:17:02
			that he's one person. He's a
simple unity, right? Because
		
01:17:02 --> 01:17:05
			Christians don't believe in three
gods. They believe in three
		
01:17:05 --> 01:17:11
			persons of God. Right? So it's
Trinitarian mono theism, whereas
		
01:17:11 --> 01:17:15
			Islam can be described as
Unitarian monotheism. Right? So
		
01:17:15 --> 01:17:18
			there are definitely differences
in how we theologizing and this
		
01:17:18 --> 01:17:20
			was also the point of many of the
early church fathers,
		
01:17:22 --> 01:17:26
			Contra Marcion, who is saying that
it's a different God. And we see
		
01:17:26 --> 01:17:29
			that paradigm now the paradigm has
shifted our elements within
		
01:17:29 --> 01:17:32
			evangelical Christians, that type
of persuasion, who are
		
01:17:32 --> 01:17:35
			perpetuating this idea that
Muslims worship a completely
		
01:17:35 --> 01:17:39
			different God, and it's not the
different God. So people, if they
		
01:17:39 --> 01:17:42
			do talk to Muslims, open the
Quran, it's very clear that
		
01:17:42 --> 01:17:46
			Muslims worship the God of
Abraham. Right? Yes, there are
		
01:17:46 --> 01:17:50
			differences in theology. That's
true. But you know, our theology
		
01:17:50 --> 01:17:53
			is very close to Jewish theology.
And I wonder how many of these
		
01:17:53 --> 01:17:57
			same evangelicals will say that
about the Jews, they worship a
		
01:17:57 --> 01:17:58
			different god? Right.
		
01:18:00 --> 01:18:06
			So, you know, obviously, if there
needs to be clarification, if by
		
01:18:06 --> 01:18:12
			God You mean the father, right,
how fast the god, Rob, Rob will
		
01:18:12 --> 01:18:17
			Alameen Yes. But if by God, you
mean, you mean Jesus, the No, we
		
01:18:17 --> 01:18:20
			don't worship Jesus. Right? We
don't worship Jesus. But
		
01:18:20 --> 01:18:24
			Christians are saying very clearly
that Jesus is the God of Abraham.
		
01:18:24 --> 01:18:26
			So it is the same garden in
principle.
		
01:18:28 --> 01:18:31
			Questions, you want to go up to
the microphone, it's over on the
		
01:18:31 --> 01:18:32
			side in the front.
		
01:18:34 --> 01:18:34
			Thank you.
		
01:18:39 --> 01:18:44
			Dr. Ali. Thank you. So I
appreciate it. And I very much
		
01:18:44 --> 01:18:49
			enjoy your argument. But there's a
counter argument as well. And the
		
01:18:49 --> 01:18:53
			counter argument, of course, is
most I would say,
		
01:18:54 --> 01:18:58
			Christian theologians wouldn't
agree with your take on even
		
01:18:58 --> 01:19:00
			interpretations. So for example,
the
		
01:19:02 --> 01:19:07
			the Council of Nicaea, right?
Looked at their dressings, even
		
01:19:07 --> 01:19:10
			like the issue, what's the Son of
God? And they clearly said this,
		
01:19:10 --> 01:19:15
			Jesus exists. And he's got to say,
I believe that their idea was that
		
01:19:17 --> 01:19:23
			the Son of God actually can exist,
and the interpretations should say
		
01:19:23 --> 01:19:26
			exactly that. I think that's what
was the result? You sort of
		
01:19:26 --> 01:19:31
			develop the argument that if we
examine the language differently,
		
01:19:31 --> 01:19:34
			we can have a different take? And
I think in some instances, yes,
		
01:19:34 --> 01:19:37
			you're correct. But in some
instances, you still go up against
		
01:19:37 --> 01:19:41
			that trend of the argument that
that insists just the opposite.
		
01:19:41 --> 01:19:43
			Yeah, I would, I would agree with
you. I would say that there's
		
01:19:43 --> 01:19:46
			different ways of reading these
texts. I would contend that
		
01:19:46 --> 01:19:50
			there's a there's a way of reading
even John's Gospel with his high
		
01:19:50 --> 01:19:55
			Christology. You know, it's
skyscraping theology, as some have
		
01:19:55 --> 01:19:57
			described it in Christology.
There's a way of reading those
		
01:19:57 --> 01:19:59
			texts through an Islamic lens
		
01:20:00 --> 01:20:03
			We can actually confirm the entire
text. And I think it's doing it
		
01:20:03 --> 01:20:07
			through the lens of what I call
Islamic field mysticism. Looking
		
01:20:07 --> 01:20:11
			at these, looking at these texts,
through through the lens of
		
01:20:11 --> 01:20:16
			Tawheed, through the lens of
Islamic spirituality, obviously,
		
01:20:16 --> 01:20:17
			you know,
		
01:20:18 --> 01:20:21
			most of the early church fathers
or if not all of them,
		
01:20:23 --> 01:20:26
			certainly after Nicaea, they would
read, you know, before Abraham was
		
01:20:26 --> 01:20:29
			I AM, and to hear Jesus claiming
to be the I Am, he's claiming to
		
01:20:29 --> 01:20:35
			be what God told Moses at the
burning bush. Yes, I realized that
		
01:20:35 --> 01:20:39
			that is a standard way of
interpreting the text. But I would
		
01:20:39 --> 01:20:41
			challenge that and say there's a
different way of reading the text.
		
01:20:41 --> 01:20:45
			Right? If you look at the Greek of
that verse 858, of John, print
		
01:20:45 --> 01:20:52
			Abraham goodness, Tiago, me,
right? So, in Exodus Eggo, me Hold
		
01:20:52 --> 01:20:56
			on, hold on, is the divine aspect
a Go me doesn't mean anything, it
		
01:20:56 --> 01:21:01
			just means I am I can say I am me
it right, the whole on the
		
01:21:01 --> 01:21:05
			predicate, that's the claim to
divinity. So, Jesus is I am, so if
		
01:21:05 --> 01:21:09
			you just have I am, I am you need
to supply a predicate or else the
		
01:21:09 --> 01:21:13
			sentence is incomplete. So, you
have to supply he I am He, in
		
01:21:13 --> 01:21:17
			order for sentence to be coherent.
I am who? Well, I think all of
		
01:21:17 --> 01:21:19
			these I am statements and John
should be governed or should be
		
01:21:19 --> 01:21:22
			delimited. By the first I am
statement, which is in John For
		
01:21:22 --> 01:21:26
			the woman at the well, who asked
Jesus I who says to Jesus, I know
		
01:21:26 --> 01:21:28
			Messiah is coming. And when He
comes, he's gonna tell us all
		
01:21:28 --> 01:21:31
			thing. He just says, ergo me.
		
01:21:32 --> 01:21:36
			I am he, I am the Messiah. So
there's different ways of reading
		
01:21:36 --> 01:21:41
			these texts. There's different
Christians, who were Unitarians
		
01:21:41 --> 01:21:44
			who revered the Gospel of John.
Right, who didn't believe that
		
01:21:44 --> 01:21:48
			Jesus was God. You know, whatever.
The Aryans believed it's hard to
		
01:21:48 --> 01:21:53
			get a firm grasp because most of
what we have from about Arias
		
01:21:53 --> 01:21:56
			Arianism is written by proto
orthodox authorities who were
		
01:21:56 --> 01:22:00
			writing, you know, refutations of
it. But it appears as if the
		
01:22:00 --> 01:22:02
			Aryans at least did not believe
that the son was equal to the
		
01:22:02 --> 01:22:08
			Father. No doubt they revered the
Gospel of John. Right. So on that
		
01:22:08 --> 01:22:12
			part, and John, as well mentioned
set in the word there was in the
		
01:22:12 --> 01:22:16
			beginning, there was the word the
word was with God, and the Word
		
01:22:17 --> 01:22:21
			was God, were you. Do you make the
same argument? Yeah, again, the
		
01:22:21 --> 01:22:25
			Greek is important, and RK and how
Lagace in the beginning was the
		
01:22:25 --> 01:22:25
			Word.
		
01:22:27 --> 01:22:32
			And the Word was with God. Chi ha
Laga, same process, tun, Theon,
		
01:22:32 --> 01:22:37
			and the Word was with the god
definite article, chi, Fe OS,
		
01:22:38 --> 01:22:45
			indefinite chi Fe EOS ain
hallazgos. And a divine entity, I
		
01:22:45 --> 01:22:49
			would say, yeah, exactly how Moses
is called by Philo. And a
		
01:22:49 --> 01:22:54
			sanctified agent was the word, a
highly exalted decree was the
		
01:22:54 --> 01:22:57
			word. So there's different ways of
reading that text. You know,
		
01:22:58 --> 01:22:59
			obviously,
		
01:23:00 --> 01:23:03
			we're gonna sort of come at
loggerheads with Trinitarian
		
01:23:04 --> 01:23:06
			exigence. Yeah. But I think that
there's a well established
		
01:23:06 --> 01:23:11
			Unitarian tradition within
Christian history that can be
		
01:23:11 --> 01:23:14
			looked at that is in line with our
theology. I enjoy your arguments,
		
01:23:14 --> 01:23:16
			and they're very well developed.
And thank you. Thank you for your
		
01:23:16 --> 01:23:18
			scholarship. Thank you, for the
hard one. Yes, sir.
		
01:23:20 --> 01:23:22
			Going to take a question from
online with your permission.
		
01:23:24 --> 01:23:30
			We have been asked by proto
Orthodox Christian, do you mean
		
01:23:30 --> 01:23:36
			before Constantine's Council of
Nicaea Gnostics were early
		
01:23:36 --> 01:23:40
			Christians, that did not go along
with the mainstream Catholic
		
01:23:40 --> 01:23:44
			doctrine? Correct? Yeah, I'm using
this term. I think it was coined
		
01:23:44 --> 01:23:49
			by Ehrman proto orthodox. So the
way that Ehrman is using it,
		
01:23:50 --> 01:23:54
			Ehrman is the author of the
Orthodox corruption of Scripture,
		
01:23:54 --> 01:24:00
			Misquoting Jesus, and many other
texts. The way that he's looking
		
01:24:00 --> 01:24:04
			at it, as he says, There's four
main groups of Christians, four
		
01:24:04 --> 01:24:09
			main groups before Nicaea, before
Nicaea, to the proto Orthodox, and
		
01:24:09 --> 01:24:13
			the Aryans are included in there
as well. There's great diversity
		
01:24:13 --> 01:24:16
			within proto orthodoxy, but
basically the forerunners of what
		
01:24:16 --> 01:24:20
			would be Orthodox Christianity.
And then another group, the
		
01:24:20 --> 01:24:22
			Gnostics and then another group,
the Marcia knights that I
		
01:24:22 --> 01:24:26
			mentioned. And then a fourth
group, he mentions as the
		
01:24:26 --> 01:24:30
			Ebionites or the you know, the,
the Jewish Christians, those
		
01:24:30 --> 01:24:33
			Christians who had a more Jewish
orientation in their in their
		
01:24:33 --> 01:24:39
			theology. So I'm using the term as
as Ehrman is using it for runners
		
01:24:39 --> 01:24:41
			of Christian orthodoxy. Let's take
a question over here.
		
01:24:43 --> 01:24:47
			Thank you, stead of ally for your
talk as a fellow lover of the
		
01:24:47 --> 01:24:52
			Bible and the Koran and their
languages. It's very refreshing to
		
01:24:52 --> 01:24:56
			hear someone who's as fluid in
God's chosen languages for His
		
01:24:56 --> 01:24:57
			scriptures as you are.
		
01:24:59 --> 01:25:00
			I found that
		
01:25:00 --> 01:25:03
			Interesting to answer the question
of whether Muslims and Christians
		
01:25:03 --> 01:25:06
			and Jews worship the same God, you
turn to language.
		
01:25:08 --> 01:25:11
			As I think the way that I've often
learned and studied biblical
		
01:25:11 --> 01:25:15
			languages from the perspective of
Modern Linguistics, the signifier,
		
01:25:15 --> 01:25:20
			the signified, it's an arbitrary
connection, why is a lot related
		
01:25:20 --> 01:25:24
			to Elohim? It's just because they
come from the same proto Semitic
		
01:25:24 --> 01:25:29
			root, it doesn't really have any
meaning in itself. That is, the
		
01:25:29 --> 01:25:34
			form of the language isn't part of
the Revelation. So how would you
		
01:25:34 --> 01:25:39
			reconcile the way that maybe a
modern linguistic approach would
		
01:25:39 --> 01:25:43
			would look at this with the way
that you're approaching it? And
		
01:25:43 --> 01:25:46
			this is not a question that I've
answered either. So I'm curious on
		
01:25:46 --> 01:25:51
			your take? Yeah, I think it's, I
think there's two ways to go about
		
01:25:51 --> 01:25:55
			the question. One is looking at
linguistic aspect of it.
		
01:25:56 --> 01:26:00
			You know, there's an old Italian
axiom that says the translator is
		
01:26:00 --> 01:26:04
			a trader, right? So looking at
languages, looking at Scripture
		
01:26:04 --> 01:26:08
			through translation, you just, I
can't I can't even do it anymore.
		
01:26:08 --> 01:26:11
			I can't read an English Koran. I
can't read the New Testament in
		
01:26:11 --> 01:26:17
			English. You. It's like watching.
What's the analogy I use? It's
		
01:26:17 --> 01:26:20
			like listening to the Superbowl on
the radio, that's a translation,
		
01:26:20 --> 01:26:26
			and then watching the Superbowl on
an IMAX in four D. That's reading
		
01:26:26 --> 01:26:30
			the original, original languages.
So I think it is important to make
		
01:26:30 --> 01:26:32
			those linguistic connections. I
think that's very important. But
		
01:26:32 --> 01:26:35
			at the end of the day, like I
said, the ancient Canaanites they
		
01:26:35 --> 01:26:39
			called God ail the Canaanites,
right? They don't worship the God
		
01:26:39 --> 01:26:44
			of Abraham. So saying, making
these linguistic connections are
		
01:26:44 --> 01:26:47
			important. But then that's why we
also have to look at the concept
		
01:26:47 --> 01:26:50
			of God. What does the Quran
actually say about God? does the
		
01:26:50 --> 01:26:53
			Quran say that this is the moon
god? What does it say? What's his
		
01:26:53 --> 01:26:57
			personality in the Quran? Is your
theological consistency there with
		
01:26:57 --> 01:27:00
			God's quote unquote, personality?
Other people point out, you know,
		
01:27:00 --> 01:27:07
			Lucifer and Isaiah, Hebrew and
Hebrew Lucifer is halal, halal,
		
01:27:07 --> 01:27:11
			right. And, you know, these
apologies, these polemicist, they
		
01:27:11 --> 01:27:13
			say, you know that moon is called
a hill out.
		
01:27:15 --> 01:27:15
			Don't.
		
01:27:17 --> 01:27:20
			So it's a symbol of Lucifer,
because it has a common
		
01:27:20 --> 01:27:25
			etymological root. Oh, really?
Yeah. You know, what else has
		
01:27:25 --> 01:27:27
			shares that route? Hallelujah.
		
01:27:28 --> 01:27:33
			Right? Well, wait a minute. So
linguistic things are interesting,
		
01:27:33 --> 01:27:36
			right? And I think that it's very,
very important. Because these
		
01:27:36 --> 01:27:39
			languages were revealed in the
these books were revealed in these
		
01:27:39 --> 01:27:45
			languages, right? That you missed
so much in translation. And you
		
01:27:45 --> 01:27:48
			really don't get the full flavor
of the text and you in the Quran.
		
01:27:49 --> 01:27:53
			There are four words for heart,
and an English for all translated
		
01:27:53 --> 01:27:58
			heart. There's four different
words, A sada and foo add and
		
01:27:58 --> 01:28:02
			called, and Loeb, and they all
have very interesting nuances of
		
01:28:02 --> 01:28:07
			meaning. And you just missed that
in translation. In the New
		
01:28:07 --> 01:28:10
			Testament, there are different
words for love in the gospel of
		
01:28:10 --> 01:28:14
			God pay philia oftentimes, you
know, at the end of the Gospel of
		
01:28:14 --> 01:28:18
			John, you know, chapter 21. You
know, Jesus asked Peter, do you
		
01:28:18 --> 01:28:21
			love me? You know, I love you. Do
you love me? You know, I love you.
		
01:28:21 --> 01:28:25
			You love me, you know, I love you
like what's going on here? But the
		
01:28:25 --> 01:28:32
			word for love is different. Right?
I got I got past me Naiku da. He
		
01:28:32 --> 01:28:32
			says
		
01:28:34 --> 01:28:36
			get nose kiss.
		
01:28:37 --> 01:28:41
			get asked this filo say says Do
you have a god pay for me? Yes,
		
01:28:41 --> 01:28:45
			Lord, you know, I have philia for
you. And then he repeats aka past
		
01:28:45 --> 01:28:49
			me. You have a god pay for me. But
the translation Do you love me is
		
01:28:49 --> 01:28:53
			I love you. You love me? Yes, I
love you. Okay. So looking at
		
01:28:53 --> 01:28:57
			language is extremely important.
So looking at these things, I
		
01:28:57 --> 01:28:57
			think,
		
01:28:59 --> 01:29:03
			at least for me, is something that
I found to be revelatory, I found
		
01:29:03 --> 01:29:08
			to be a way of bringing
communities together. Right, is a
		
01:29:08 --> 01:29:13
			way of, of heightening the
discourse from the polemicist some
		
01:29:13 --> 01:29:17
			of you know, turn this on its side
and it says Bismillah which is
		
01:29:18 --> 01:29:22
			unfortunately very, very popular.
You have Muslim polemicists, right
		
01:29:22 --> 01:29:26
			who go up and they make fun of the
Bible. You know, they laugh at
		
01:29:26 --> 01:29:29
			Christians, you know what they do
in church man? They take this
		
01:29:29 --> 01:29:33
			bread and it's like, what do you
you know, the Quran says Orilla
		
01:29:33 --> 01:29:37
			CBD Arabic Bill Hekmati? Well
Merida till Hassan what Jad dill
		
01:29:37 --> 01:29:41
			humility, here axon, the Quran
says called people to the way of
		
01:29:41 --> 01:29:46
			your LORD with Wisdom and the
aroma hearsay wisdom here is with,
		
01:29:46 --> 01:29:50
			with proofs with with
sophisticated
		
01:29:51 --> 01:29:55
			academic rigor. What about you?
That's an hasna. And with
		
01:29:55 --> 01:29:59
			beautiful exhortation This means
to do it with a good comportment.
		
01:30:00 --> 01:30:04
			Right. So one is not arrogant when
they're doing it. And one isn't.
		
01:30:06 --> 01:30:10
			One one isn't very humble but
cannot provide academic proofs
		
01:30:11 --> 01:30:15
			and debate with them or argue with
them in ways that are better than
		
01:30:15 --> 01:30:21
			then, you know, just argumentation
for the sake of ego, as the
		
01:30:21 --> 01:30:25
			scholars interpret that, let's
take a couple of questions here
		
01:30:25 --> 01:30:27
			because we're running out of time.
So if you can make a question
		
01:30:27 --> 01:30:30
			short, and we'll try and move
through, thanks. It's not like
		
01:30:31 --> 01:30:33
			you said that the word theist is
used as
		
01:30:36 --> 01:30:39
			an Loralee upbringing for Jesus
and Moses in the Bible, in the
		
01:30:39 --> 01:30:43
			Bible, not in the Bible. Moses by
Philo. Okay, contemporary of John.
		
01:30:43 --> 01:30:46
			Yeah. Okay. So do you know so
those are two prophets that didn't
		
01:30:46 --> 01:30:49
			have fathers? Do you know that the
same word is used for prophets who
		
01:30:49 --> 01:30:54
			did have fathers such as Joseph or
Abraham, Ishmael?
		
01:30:55 --> 01:30:59
			Isaac, who didn't have fathers
didn't have fathers, they weren't
		
01:30:59 --> 01:31:03
			brought up by their fathers.
Right. So I word was used for them
		
01:31:03 --> 01:31:08
			as in lordly nourishment. Okay. I
don't know. I mean, the point I
		
01:31:08 --> 01:31:12
			was making is that floss, anyone
can be a floss, the judges are
		
01:31:12 --> 01:31:16
			called Gods at 10 Elohim. That's,
that's the Hebrew of judges.
		
01:31:16 --> 01:31:20
			That's what Jesus uses in John, in
his debate against the Pharisees.
		
01:31:20 --> 01:31:23
			And these judges probably were
raised by their fathers. That's
		
01:31:23 --> 01:31:28
			not the point. The point is that,
that a famous atheists a God and
		
01:31:28 --> 01:31:31
			we obviously, this is, you know,
we have to get accustomed to how
		
01:31:31 --> 01:31:34
			the Bible uses language because
I'm not gonna say that, you know,
		
01:31:34 --> 01:31:39
			what, Allah when he is a God, we
don't call men God. Ila a God is
		
01:31:39 --> 01:31:44
			not used the way we use Arabic.
Right. But that word really means
		
01:31:44 --> 01:31:45
			what the
		
01:31:46 --> 01:31:50
			right that's what that means. You
are saints of God, sanctified
		
01:31:50 --> 01:31:55
			agents of God. That's, I believe
that's how it's being used in the
		
01:31:55 --> 01:31:56
			Tanakh and in the New Testament.
		
01:32:00 --> 01:32:04
			Salam Alaikum. Welcome. So I want
to ask you a question regarding
		
01:32:04 --> 01:32:09
			the comparing the gods from
Christianity and Old Testament,
		
01:32:10 --> 01:32:16
			Jews and Islam. I got a question I
really about the Gospel says,
		
01:32:17 --> 01:32:21
			Jesus Christ said, Whoever came
before me, he was a thief and
		
01:32:21 --> 01:32:28
			liar. So Christianity says, That's
why only Jesus didn't lie. So
		
01:32:28 --> 01:32:32
			whereas before was a false
question is if the John came and
		
01:32:32 --> 01:32:37
			introduced Jesus Christ, so
according to the book is a liar.
		
01:32:38 --> 01:32:43
			And Abraham was a liar. Moses was
a liar. So I should actually ask
		
01:32:43 --> 01:32:47
			this question about the pastor. I
know your knowledge about them,
		
01:32:47 --> 01:32:48
			Gospels, and also,
		
01:32:49 --> 01:32:50
			Paul says,
		
01:32:51 --> 01:32:54
			The Jews killed God.
		
01:32:55 --> 01:33:01
			And the Jews are our enemy and
God's enemy. So if the Paul
		
01:33:01 --> 01:33:04
			believe on the other Christianity,
believe it, they shouldn't believe
		
01:33:04 --> 01:33:08
			anything on Old Testament and
Torah, because all those messenger
		
01:33:08 --> 01:33:12
			of God came. And if they are, you
know, they think that they killed
		
01:33:12 --> 01:33:16
			God, then how come they don't
separate their books? That's my
		
01:33:16 --> 01:33:20
			question. Yeah. Thank you. Good
question. So I think what you're
		
01:33:20 --> 01:33:22
			referring to earlier in John 10,
perhaps,
		
01:33:23 --> 01:33:28
			John 10, I am I am the good
shepherd is a John 10. Anyone to
		
01:33:28 --> 01:33:33
			remember. So he says before me
were were before me came.
		
01:33:34 --> 01:33:38
			Thieves and brigands lay stays. I
don't think he's talking about
		
01:33:38 --> 01:33:42
			prophets that came before him. I
don't interpret it that way. I
		
01:33:42 --> 01:33:47
			think he's talking about messianic
claimants who came before him. And
		
01:33:47 --> 01:33:53
			obviously, we're liars because
Jesus is the true Messiah.
		
01:33:54 --> 01:33:59
			And he says he, he characterizes
these pseudo messiahs as those who
		
01:33:59 --> 01:34:03
			want to enter through another door
into the sheep gate, not through
		
01:34:03 --> 01:34:08
			the proper door, and he says, I am
that door. Right. So you know,
		
01:34:08 --> 01:34:12
			people who want to materialize the
messianic kingdom through other
		
01:34:12 --> 01:34:16
			ways. For example, you can take
example like Barabas, right
		
01:34:16 --> 01:34:17
			through zealotry
		
01:34:18 --> 01:34:22
			or one can make an example of like
Judas trying to force you know,
		
01:34:23 --> 01:34:24
			Christ to do something.
		
01:34:26 --> 01:34:28
			Allahu Allah. I don't know, but I
don't think he's referring to
		
01:34:29 --> 01:34:34
			previous prophets there. And as
far as what Paul says, about, you
		
01:34:34 --> 01:34:35
			know, the Jews with a Judeans.
		
01:34:37 --> 01:34:38
			Yeah, I would I would consider
		
01:34:39 --> 01:34:42
			a lot of what Paul says to be
problematic. I think you're
		
01:34:42 --> 01:34:49
			referring to First Thessalonians
215 where he says, they they
		
01:34:49 --> 01:34:53
			killed the Lord Jesus and their
prophets, they please not God and
		
01:34:53 --> 01:34:55
			are contrary to all men.
		
01:34:57 --> 01:35:00
			So this requires a sophisticated X
		
01:35:00 --> 01:35:03
			to Jesus that I can't give you
right now. But on the face of
		
01:35:03 --> 01:35:05
			that, and it's really important,
you know that when we look at
		
01:35:05 --> 01:35:08
			these texts, I can make anyone
look violent and racist. I can
		
01:35:08 --> 01:35:12
			quote something from the Koran out
of context and make the text look
		
01:35:12 --> 01:35:18
			like it's, you know, terribly
violent, or sexist or misogynist.
		
01:35:18 --> 01:35:21
			I can do that with my monitors, I
can do what the khazali I can do
		
01:35:21 --> 01:35:24
			with Aquinas, right. So these
things require me I can't answer
		
01:35:24 --> 01:35:28
			this question in 30 seconds. These
things require sophisticated
		
01:35:28 --> 01:35:28
			exegesis.
		
01:35:30 --> 01:35:30
			You know,
		
01:35:33 --> 01:35:36
			we'll tell you a story. But Forget
it. I'll tell you next time around
		
01:35:36 --> 01:35:40
			is there a question from the
online? That actually our camera
		
01:35:40 --> 01:35:43
			lady had a very good question. I
want to give her the opportunity
		
01:35:43 --> 01:35:46
			to let's, let's make that the last
question. Because we're running
		
01:35:46 --> 01:35:50
			out of time. Go ahead. I can you
expand upon people calling
		
01:35:50 --> 01:35:55
			themselves gods? You mentioned
that. And when you said it, you
		
01:35:55 --> 01:36:00
			mentioned people calling
themselves gods? Can you expand
		
01:36:00 --> 01:36:03
			upon that only because when you
said that I instantly thought
		
01:36:03 --> 01:36:08
			about in hip hop culture, there's
the commonality of people calling
		
01:36:08 --> 01:36:09
			themselves gods and
		
01:36:10 --> 01:36:14
			and there's branches of people
within the African American
		
01:36:14 --> 01:36:18
			community that this is like a
thing. And so I just wanted to if
		
01:36:18 --> 01:36:21
			you could expand upon that, okay,
well, that's something in pop
		
01:36:21 --> 01:36:24
			culture. I'm out of touch. So
		
01:36:25 --> 01:36:28
			you know, I'm I'm quite agent,
when it comes to that.
		
01:36:29 --> 01:36:31
			I'm still talking about Three's
Company. So
		
01:36:32 --> 01:36:33
			anyway,
		
01:36:34 --> 01:36:41
			yeah. So this again, this concept
of human beings being called God,
		
01:36:41 --> 01:36:43
			this is found in the Old and New
Testament, it appears like the
		
01:36:43 --> 01:36:49
			word in Greek faith boss is
applied to broadly to someone who
		
01:36:49 --> 01:36:50
			has some sort of
		
01:36:52 --> 01:36:54
			extraordinary ability of some
sort.
		
01:36:56 --> 01:37:00
			You know, the god of this world,
you know, reference to Satan, you
		
01:37:00 --> 01:37:03
			know, he has an extraordinary
ability. But I think when the,
		
01:37:03 --> 01:37:08
			Jesus says in John, those to whom
receive those, those who receive
		
01:37:08 --> 01:37:12
			the messages of God are called
Gods in Scripture cannot be
		
01:37:12 --> 01:37:16
			broken. So in the Old Testament
has phenomena of, of prophets of
		
01:37:16 --> 01:37:18
			God being referred to as God?
		
01:37:19 --> 01:37:23
			Right interchangeably. Very
interesting. I think there's some
		
01:37:23 --> 01:37:26
			of this in the Quran. Juan Mata
Mata either Amita, while akin
		
01:37:26 --> 01:37:31
			Allah ha Rama, very interesting
verse, the prophet one time, he
		
01:37:31 --> 01:37:36
			picked up some stones and he threw
them. And God said to him, You
		
01:37:36 --> 01:37:43
			didn't throw when you threw God
through? Meaning that the limbs
		
01:37:43 --> 01:37:47
			the actions, the words of the
Prophet are totally guided by God
		
01:37:47 --> 01:37:51
			when he does something even so
seemingly mundane, it is according
		
01:37:51 --> 01:37:55
			to God's will, pleasing will. That
type of mystical union it is as if
		
01:37:55 --> 01:37:59
			even out of the stresses it is as
if God did it. And the prophet
		
01:37:59 --> 01:38:04
			speaks it is as if God is
speaking, as if Kana, right
		
01:38:04 --> 01:38:08
			because his limbs and his speech
are guided by God. There's a
		
01:38:08 --> 01:38:11
			beautiful Hadith a sound Hadith in
Bukhari, Hadith glitzy sacred
		
01:38:11 --> 01:38:16
			Hadith extra Quranic utterance,
the Prophet says, that God says,
		
01:38:16 --> 01:38:19
			My servant does not draw close
unto me with anything more beloved
		
01:38:19 --> 01:38:24
			by me than his obligatory acts of
worship. While Ah, yes, I do. Abdi
		
01:38:24 --> 01:38:28
			Yatta caribou, Illa benowa Phil,
and he continues to draw close
		
01:38:28 --> 01:38:34
			unto me, with extra acts of
worship had to hit by until I love
		
01:38:34 --> 01:38:38
			him, and then I become the eye by
which he sees the hand by which he
		
01:38:38 --> 01:38:42
			holds and the foot by which he
walks and he if he were to ask
		
01:38:42 --> 01:38:44
			anything from me, I shall surely
give it to him.
		
01:38:45 --> 01:38:48
			So this is not we don't take this
hockey cut to God becomes your eye
		
01:38:48 --> 01:38:51
			becomes that means this person
become sanctified by God.
		
01:38:52 --> 01:38:56
			His limbs become guided by God.
This is a type of mystical union
		
01:38:56 --> 01:39:00
			that we're talking about. Such
people are called I will Yeah, in
		
01:39:00 --> 01:39:03
			Arabic in the court in the Bible,
they're called Elohim gods.
		
01:39:04 --> 01:39:06
			divinities lowercase d,
		
01:39:07 --> 01:39:08
			right.
		
01:39:10 --> 01:39:15
			Also in the Quran surah to Toba is
62. What Allahu Allah sunnah who
		
01:39:15 --> 01:39:20
			are Haku and Euro do who God and
His Messenger it is more befitting
		
01:39:20 --> 01:39:23
			that you please him. So two
subjects are mentioned but the
		
01:39:23 --> 01:39:27
			pronoun is third masculine,
singular, it's not a duel. So one
		
01:39:27 --> 01:39:31
			might say, well, it looks like an
error. The reference is two but
		
01:39:31 --> 01:39:34
			the pronoun is see, no, this was
intentional. Aim for it to be
		
01:39:34 --> 01:39:37
			says. This means that God and His
Messenger have an intimate very
		
01:39:37 --> 01:39:41
			close relationship, that if you
please, Allah's Messenger, it is
		
01:39:41 --> 01:39:45
			as if you're pleasing God. If you
displease Allah's messengers, as
		
01:39:45 --> 01:39:47
			if you're displeasing God, this
type of mystical union.
		
01:39:48 --> 01:39:49
			Alright.
		
01:39:50 --> 01:39:54
			And there's other things we can
look at as well. But maybe we're
		
01:39:54 --> 01:39:58
			out of time. Okay, please join me
in giving a round of applause to
		
01:39:58 --> 01:39:58
			Dr. Olea thigh
		
01:40:06 --> 01:40:09
			Thank you very much. If I said
anything offensive, please forgive
		
01:40:09 --> 01:40:09
			me.
		
01:40:11 --> 01:40:14
			So thank you. Thank you all for
coming and on the way out. You
		
01:40:14 --> 01:40:17
			might peek into the bookstore and
be safe tonight. May God be with
		
01:40:17 --> 01:40:18
			you