Abdur Rahman ibn Yusuf Mangera – Q&A The Civil Divorce is not a Talaq

Abdur Rahman ibn Yusuf Mangera
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speaker discusses how most people have been divorced legally and how this is a separate system. They explain that civil divorce is a legal issue and that it's up to the court to accept or decline a request for divorce. The speaker also mentions that the court may decide that the words "slapping" or "naught to do" are too vague to qualify as divorce.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:00 --> 00:00:04
			Okay, this question, very
important question. If you have
		
00:00:04 --> 00:00:09
			been divorced legally, as a civil
divorce in the courts with your
		
00:00:09 --> 00:00:12
			husband, does that make you
automatically divorced
		
00:00:12 --> 00:00:18
			Islamically. After looking at this
very deeply, most of them have
		
00:00:18 --> 00:00:23
			these majority, right? If not all,
they pretty much agree that it's a
		
00:00:23 --> 00:00:28
			whole separate system. And the
reason for that is, Pollock is
		
00:00:28 --> 00:00:31
			something that's issued by the man
by saying Talaq or I divorce you
		
00:00:31 --> 00:00:34
			or you are divorced to some words
to that, to that effect. When you
		
00:00:34 --> 00:00:38
			petition it through the court,
you're actually petitioning for a
		
00:00:38 --> 00:00:41
			divorce, you're not divorcing
yourself. So what you're saying to
		
00:00:41 --> 00:00:45
			the judge, is that on these
grounds, I would like to be
		
00:00:45 --> 00:00:50
			granted a divorce from my husband
from my wife, right? Now, it's up
		
00:00:50 --> 00:00:54
			to the judge under the
circumstances that he sees to
		
00:00:54 --> 00:00:58
			them, and all the civil connection
and marriage that you have, he
		
00:00:58 --> 00:01:01
			doesn't care about your Islamic
marriage. It's got nothing to do
		
00:01:01 --> 00:01:03
			with him. If you told him, Look,
I've got a Nikka to this person, I
		
00:01:03 --> 00:01:07
			don't have a civil marriage, can
you please dissolute this marriage
		
00:01:07 --> 00:01:11
			for us? He won't be able to do so.
Right? It's a totally different
		
00:01:11 --> 00:01:15
			system because they don't
recognize Nikka at all. Civil
		
00:01:15 --> 00:01:19
			Courts, marriage is a kind of a
legal issue. It's not a religious
		
00:01:19 --> 00:01:23
			issue. So they're totally
separate. Yes, sometimes.
		
00:01:24 --> 00:01:31
			Sometimes, in some countries, if
the wording on this divorce, is
		
00:01:31 --> 00:01:35
			that I divorce my wife clearly,
then in that case, that might also
		
00:01:35 --> 00:01:37
			act as a divorce. But in this
country, if you look at the
		
00:01:37 --> 00:01:40
			wording, it's got nothing to do
with that it's petitioning for a
		
00:01:40 --> 00:01:44
			divorce. Sometimes the clear words
are not even used at all. It's
		
00:01:44 --> 00:01:47
			just literally a petition. And
it's up to the court to accept
		
00:01:47 --> 00:01:52
			that and this is the opinion of
most of the movies of, of even
		
00:01:52 --> 00:01:55
			this country and of other
countries like South Africa, etc
		
00:01:55 --> 00:01:55
			as well.