Abdur Rahman ibn Yusuf Mangera – Q&A Is There Anything Wrong Saying Ya Rasullulah

Abdur Rahman ibn Yusuf Mangera
AI: Summary ©
The speaker discusses the confusion surrounding the use of "RA" in various Indian context, citing examples such as the Arasu, which is a portrayal of a Prophet. The speaker suggests that the use of "RA" in certain contexts is because certain groups want to close the door, but by default, there is no Schilke in the writing. The speaker also mentions that the use of "RA" in certain contexts is because certain groups want to close the door, but by default, there is no Schilke in the writing.
AI: Transcript ©
00:00:02 --> 00:00:05

What is the ruling on saying Ya rasool Allah was told that this is

00:00:05 --> 00:00:08

wrong and many other sects do it and we should refrain yet it is

00:00:08 --> 00:00:11

hurting many nasheeds by default to say Jaros will Allah there's

00:00:11 --> 00:00:14

nothing wrong with it. It's the Aqeedah that goes with it that is

00:00:14 --> 00:00:19

corruptive. So, generally in the in the Indian subcontinent because

00:00:19 --> 00:00:23

of a certain group who had a certain Aqeedah certain belief

00:00:23 --> 00:00:25

when they said, Yeah rasool Allah, they believe that the Prophet

00:00:25 --> 00:00:28

sallallahu sallam was like Allah available and looking at all

00:00:28 --> 00:00:31

times. And that's when you say the Arasu lies like you're saying,

00:00:31 --> 00:00:34

Yeah, Allah, that becomes corruptive. But if that's not the

00:00:34 --> 00:00:37

case and out of love, you say, Yeah, Allah, just like, there's

00:00:37 --> 00:00:40

many women, they say, oh, Ma, right there, mom is nobody there.

00:00:40 --> 00:00:42

It's just Oh Ma. It's this kind of an expression. So there are many

00:00:42 --> 00:00:47

levels that if you just say it out of Shulk out of extreme love for

00:00:47 --> 00:00:51

him, just like that, and you know, he's not here. Right? He could be

00:00:51 --> 00:00:55

other Allah could put him anywhere he wants, but you can't say he's

00:00:55 --> 00:00:58

here right now. Just because you want him to be. He's not at your

00:00:58 --> 00:01:02

bidding. Right? So if you just say just like that, just out of love

00:01:02 --> 00:01:04

or expression, that's why Mala should return. He's got that in

00:01:04 --> 00:01:08

poems as well. Right? My only use of Ludhiana in Abdullah Ahmed

00:01:08 --> 00:01:11

serratus team has got a very good discussion whether if you do it

00:01:11 --> 00:01:15

just out of poetry, write it just like you do in poetry, like you

00:01:15 --> 00:01:19

say, a badass Abba, which means Oh breeze of the morning. I mean, you

00:01:19 --> 00:01:23

know, you can't hear you, but you just say it's an expression. So

00:01:23 --> 00:01:27

there is no Schilke in the exact words, but they imply shirk.

00:01:28 --> 00:01:33

Right. So in certain contexts, so that's the way it is. But the

00:01:33 --> 00:01:36

reason why the Hindustani orlimar, the Indian subcontinent, rather,

00:01:36 --> 00:01:39

my generally avoided or generally discouraged generally is because

00:01:39 --> 00:01:43

of the corrupt Aqeedah of certain groups, and thus, they just want

00:01:43 --> 00:01:46

to close the door, but by default, there's nothing wrong with it.

Share Page