Abdur Rahman ibn Yusuf Mangera – Q&A Is There Anything Wrong Saying Ya Rasullulah

Abdur Rahman ibn Yusuf Mangera
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The speaker discusses the confusion surrounding the use of "RA" in various Indian context, citing examples such as the Arasu, which is a portrayal of a Prophet. The speaker suggests that the use of "RA" in certain contexts is because certain groups want to close the door, but by default, there is no Schilke in the writing. The speaker also mentions that the use of "RA" in certain contexts is because certain groups want to close the door, but by default, there is no Schilke in the writing.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:02 --> 00:00:05
			What is the ruling on saying Ya
rasool Allah was told that this is
		
00:00:05 --> 00:00:08
			wrong and many other sects do it
and we should refrain yet it is
		
00:00:08 --> 00:00:11
			hurting many nasheeds by default
to say Jaros will Allah there's
		
00:00:11 --> 00:00:14
			nothing wrong with it. It's the
Aqeedah that goes with it that is
		
00:00:14 --> 00:00:19
			corruptive. So, generally in the
in the Indian subcontinent because
		
00:00:19 --> 00:00:23
			of a certain group who had a
certain Aqeedah certain belief
		
00:00:23 --> 00:00:25
			when they said, Yeah rasool Allah,
they believe that the Prophet
		
00:00:25 --> 00:00:28
			sallallahu sallam was like Allah
available and looking at all
		
00:00:28 --> 00:00:31
			times. And that's when you say the
Arasu lies like you're saying,
		
00:00:31 --> 00:00:34
			Yeah, Allah, that becomes
corruptive. But if that's not the
		
00:00:34 --> 00:00:37
			case and out of love, you say,
Yeah, Allah, just like, there's
		
00:00:37 --> 00:00:40
			many women, they say, oh, Ma,
right there, mom is nobody there.
		
00:00:40 --> 00:00:42
			It's just Oh Ma. It's this kind of
an expression. So there are many
		
00:00:42 --> 00:00:47
			levels that if you just say it out
of Shulk out of extreme love for
		
00:00:47 --> 00:00:51
			him, just like that, and you know,
he's not here. Right? He could be
		
00:00:51 --> 00:00:55
			other Allah could put him anywhere
he wants, but you can't say he's
		
00:00:55 --> 00:00:58
			here right now. Just because you
want him to be. He's not at your
		
00:00:58 --> 00:01:02
			bidding. Right? So if you just say
just like that, just out of love
		
00:01:02 --> 00:01:04
			or expression, that's why Mala
should return. He's got that in
		
00:01:04 --> 00:01:08
			poems as well. Right? My only use
of Ludhiana in Abdullah Ahmed
		
00:01:08 --> 00:01:11
			serratus team has got a very good
discussion whether if you do it
		
00:01:11 --> 00:01:15
			just out of poetry, write it just
like you do in poetry, like you
		
00:01:15 --> 00:01:19
			say, a badass Abba, which means Oh
breeze of the morning. I mean, you
		
00:01:19 --> 00:01:23
			know, you can't hear you, but you
just say it's an expression. So
		
00:01:23 --> 00:01:27
			there is no Schilke in the exact
words, but they imply shirk.
		
00:01:28 --> 00:01:33
			Right. So in certain contexts, so
that's the way it is. But the
		
00:01:33 --> 00:01:36
			reason why the Hindustani orlimar,
the Indian subcontinent, rather,
		
00:01:36 --> 00:01:39
			my generally avoided or generally
discouraged generally is because
		
00:01:39 --> 00:01:43
			of the corrupt Aqeedah of certain
groups, and thus, they just want
		
00:01:43 --> 00:01:46
			to close the door, but by default,
there's nothing wrong with it.