Abdur Rahman ibn Yusuf Mangera – Q&A Allocating a Juz’ to Members of a Whatsapp Qur’an Reading Group

Abdur Rahman ibn Yusuf Mangera
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

A group on WhatsApp is trying to convince their friends to participate in a group where they will receive a prize for completing a video. The group is concerned about the frequency of the video and the potential for pressure to force participants to do it. The group advises against allocating in this way unless everyone is willing to participate and encourages them to stay out of it for a week if they want to.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:00 --> 00:00:03
			A friend of mine has started a
group on WhatsApp whereby a group
		
00:00:03 --> 00:00:08
			of sisters are allocated a Jews of
the Quran to read every week. And
		
00:00:08 --> 00:00:11
			the aim is at one column be
completed and the reward for the
		
00:00:11 --> 00:00:15
			benefit of those who passed away.
Can you please state if this is
		
00:00:15 --> 00:00:18
			okay to participate in,
participate in our listen to your,
		
00:00:18 --> 00:00:22
			your clip on using WhatsApp to
benefit the dead, but just wanted
		
00:00:22 --> 00:00:26
			to make sure that the allocation
of a Jews as opposed to choice, I
		
00:00:26 --> 00:00:29
			don't think Jews should be
allocated because that is then
		
00:00:29 --> 00:00:34
			seen as soft pressure or pressure?
And then everybody's gonna say why
		
00:00:34 --> 00:00:37
			didn't you do it? So I think it
would be wrong to allocate unless
		
00:00:37 --> 00:00:40
			everybody's willing and say you
just give it to us. One has to
		
00:00:40 --> 00:00:44
			understand that while this is this
can be a good thing. If any kind
		
00:00:44 --> 00:00:50
			of force is applied, in this case,
any kind of pressure that somebody
		
00:00:50 --> 00:00:54
			do this choose and why didn't do
it and all the rest of it, then
		
00:00:54 --> 00:00:57
			that would become wrong, because
you can't obligate somebody to do
		
00:00:57 --> 00:01:00
			something that is not obligate
obligatory. It's an optional
		
00:01:00 --> 00:01:03
			thing. So one has to be very
careful about that. So I would, I
		
00:01:03 --> 00:01:08
			would say that don't allocate
unless everybody's willing clearly
		
00:01:08 --> 00:01:11
			and you believe that they're
willing to be allocated, just let
		
00:01:11 --> 00:01:14
			them choose and let them stay out
of it for one week if they want
		
00:01:14 --> 00:01:18
			to. And there should be no
obligation whatsoever. You can
		
00:01:18 --> 00:01:22
			encourage but you can't, you can't
obligate So, rather than
		
00:01:22 --> 00:01:23
			allocation, let it be choice