Abdur Rahman ibn Yusuf Mangera – Courses Islamic Theology Program 2018 19 Whitethread Institute

Abdur Rahman ibn Yusuf Mangera
Share Page

AI: Summary ©

The course on theology is designed to provide critical understanding of religion, religion, and science, including the "medianist philosophy" and "medianist concepts." The course is designed to provide a critical understanding of these topics, including religion, religion, and science, and is designed to optimize understanding of the various topics covered, including religion, religion, and science. The course is designed to provide practical exposure to various topics such as transgenderism, women's clothing, and women's sexuality, and is designed to optimize understanding of Islam and provide practical exposure to various topics.

AI: Summary ©

00:00:00 --> 00:00:03
			So if we move over Inshallah, to
our theology program,
		
00:00:06 --> 00:00:10
			we had, I think we had about just
less than 30 students 27 or
		
00:00:10 --> 00:00:15
			something students in that, again,
they were probably less that used
		
00:00:15 --> 00:00:19
			to come on site than those who
used to mashallah very diligently.
		
00:00:20 --> 00:00:22
			There's a number of students who
		
00:00:23 --> 00:00:28
			were on track that listen to the
entire
		
00:00:29 --> 00:00:33
			program, over the course of, you
know, the eight to nine months
		
00:00:33 --> 00:00:36
			that we were doing it. Now the
theology program was split into
		
00:00:36 --> 00:00:41
			two, which I detail last year,
which we detail as it is actually
		
00:00:41 --> 00:00:46
			two aspects to it. So half of it,
the full theology program, which
		
00:00:46 --> 00:00:50
			was nine hours, this year, it's
going to be two and a half times
		
00:00:50 --> 00:00:54
			three, which means seven and a
half hours, approximately last
		
00:00:54 --> 00:00:59
			year, it was actually 369 hours.
So Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday
		
00:00:59 --> 00:00:59
			evenings.
		
00:01:02 --> 00:01:04
			So what we had in here is that
half of it dealt with the
		
00:01:04 --> 00:01:07
			classical sources. So we dealt
with, we took two texts, one was
		
00:01:07 --> 00:01:11
			Charlotte Aqeedah, at the Hawaii
of Madani and Hamdulillah that was
		
00:01:11 --> 00:01:15
			covered. So you've got the
maturity, the understanding, then
		
00:01:15 --> 00:01:19
			we took the shuttle hurried el
Bahia. And that was quite
		
00:01:19 --> 00:01:23
			interesting text, because
initially it starts off as being
		
00:01:23 --> 00:01:27
			very terse, very refined, very
particular, the Arabic is very
		
00:01:27 --> 00:01:30
			challenging, and then after it
becomes very, very easy after
		
00:01:30 --> 00:01:34
			about 20% of the book, but it
gives you an understanding of the
		
00:01:34 --> 00:01:38
			shady side of things, when you
have the two together, you It
		
00:01:38 --> 00:01:42
			complements each other because the
order is not the same. So when you
		
00:01:42 --> 00:01:47
			studied the SIFAT in here, then
you get to refine them in the in
		
00:01:47 --> 00:01:50
			the other text. And then another
discussion would come before in
		
00:01:50 --> 00:01:54
			the other text, and you then take
it in the herida. Then after that,
		
00:01:55 --> 00:02:00
			once the sherlocky that the habia
of Madani was completed then we
		
00:02:00 --> 00:02:03
			started looking at Coronavirus
commentary. So we did several
		
00:02:03 --> 00:02:06
			selections of that we weren't able
to cover the whole commentary,
		
00:02:06 --> 00:02:09
			because that wasn't intended
either. So that was the Arabic
		
00:02:09 --> 00:02:11
			part of it. The other aspect of it
		
00:02:12 --> 00:02:17
			is were primarily starving Milan
and Dr. Sephora, they dealt with
		
00:02:17 --> 00:02:24
			that. And I'm going to leave it to
start Imran to explain what we did
		
00:02:24 --> 00:02:28
			last year in in overall, and what
we're going to how we're going to
		
00:02:28 --> 00:02:32
			maybe adjust that for next year.
But that was a very, very
		
00:02:32 --> 00:02:36
			ambitious program. And the reason
for it is that we covered several
		
00:02:36 --> 00:02:39
			different things in there starting
from, you can say Plato and
		
00:02:39 --> 00:02:43
			Aristotle because a lot of the we
live in the West, much of the
		
00:02:43 --> 00:02:47
			Western philosophy, Western
understanding of the world, about
		
00:02:47 --> 00:02:50
			life, about the brain about
		
00:02:51 --> 00:02:54
			about the heart, if I mean, I
don't think that's a big
		
00:02:54 --> 00:02:57
			discussion of the heart, but about
the hereafter whether there is a
		
00:02:57 --> 00:03:02
			hereafter. And a lot of that is
comes primarily through Aristotle
		
00:03:02 --> 00:03:05
			and Plato and it goes on it
filters, changes, adjusts, gets
		
00:03:05 --> 00:03:09
			replaced, grits critique
critiqued, so the major thinkers
		
00:03:09 --> 00:03:13
			that we dealt with, I mean, what
this course gave me I mean,
		
00:03:13 --> 00:03:16
			because I was listening, when I
wasn't teaching the other part of
		
00:03:16 --> 00:03:19
			it, I was listening. One of the
greatest benefits of this is that
		
00:03:19 --> 00:03:23
			you then begin to understand what
feminism is actually all about.
		
00:03:25 --> 00:03:30
			Where does the whole issue about
religion and science? Where does
		
00:03:30 --> 00:03:35
			it converge? And where does it go
wrong? Right? Where does, for
		
00:03:35 --> 00:03:41
			example, a lot of the lot of what
you read in the media, and a lot
		
00:03:41 --> 00:03:45
			of the onslaught against Islam, a
lot of the post modernist ideas,
		
00:03:45 --> 00:03:50
			right, that are basically based in
founded in existentialism, and
		
00:03:51 --> 00:03:55
			hermeneutics the way they look at
texts and so on. It just gives you
		
00:03:55 --> 00:03:58
			an understanding for any alum,
really, this understanding is so
		
00:03:58 --> 00:04:02
			important, because this is the
kind of thought process the
		
00:04:02 --> 00:04:06
			mentality the the ideas that we're
dealing with on a day to day
		
00:04:06 --> 00:04:09
			basis. And we just get caught up
in that. And we don't know how to
		
00:04:09 --> 00:04:13
			respond because we don't know
where it's coming from on what
		
00:04:13 --> 00:04:16
			foundations is it based when you
understand you can immediately
		
00:04:16 --> 00:04:19
			tell that okay, this is coming
from an empirical perspective,
		
00:04:19 --> 00:04:25
			this is coming from an existential
issue. Now, the that was mashallah
		
00:04:25 --> 00:04:29
			diligently taught and the amount
of hours and subjects that were
		
00:04:29 --> 00:04:35
			covered in the, one of the our,
you can say, our supporters, right
		
00:04:35 --> 00:04:38
			where I mentioned him earlier, we
actually took the course as well,
		
00:04:38 --> 00:04:41
			is Prince Ghazi, who is a
philosophy in his own right,
		
00:04:41 --> 00:04:45
			because he studied all of Plato's
books. He's actually got two PhDs
		
00:04:46 --> 00:04:50
			on filosofi philosophies,
subjects. He took the whole course
		
00:04:50 --> 00:04:55
			and I was surprised that he he was
on it was always on time. He
		
00:04:55 --> 00:04:57
			didn't like behind too much.
Within two weeks, he would have
		
00:04:57 --> 00:05:00
			you know, you would never have
more than probably two
		
00:05:00 --> 00:05:04
			are three lessons outstanding was
on the ball. And we wanted to
		
00:05:04 --> 00:05:06
			change the course like he says,
No, you're not going to change the
		
00:05:06 --> 00:05:10
			course, this is probably the most
unique course that you have. And
		
00:05:11 --> 00:05:16
			it basically is so unique. He
reckons that nobody else no other
		
00:05:16 --> 00:05:19
			university forget Islamic
University in non US Muslim
		
00:05:19 --> 00:05:22
			University is not even providing
the scope that we're providing.
		
00:05:23 --> 00:05:27
			Because we're dealing with lots of
stuff in there, right evolution,
		
00:05:27 --> 00:05:32
			gender, fluidity, artificial
intelligence, there's just so much
		
00:05:32 --> 00:05:36
			that's been dealt with in the,
that it's quite unique. So if
		
00:05:36 --> 00:05:39
			somebody really wants to
understand, I think anybody who's
		
00:05:39 --> 00:05:40
			really wants to
		
00:05:42 --> 00:05:45
			become aware of how to deal with a
lot of the common questions and
		
00:05:45 --> 00:05:49
			contemporary challenges, this
course is very, very important, it
		
00:05:49 --> 00:05:52
			can sound a bit daunting, some
aspects of it are done. But look,
		
00:05:52 --> 00:05:55
			if you don't understand the whole
thing, that's fine. Right, at
		
00:05:55 --> 00:05:58
			least you can take back a lot and
get an understanding of where
		
00:05:58 --> 00:06:03
			things are coming from. So I'm
gonna let him run. Unfortunately,
		
00:06:03 --> 00:06:07
			Dr. Spock was supposed to be here,
he was unable to come today, he
		
00:06:07 --> 00:06:10
			had to pull out the last
yesterday. But to start him run,
		
00:06:10 --> 00:06:14
			he'll do his part. And, again, if
you have any questions about these
		
00:06:14 --> 00:06:17
			things, we're going to take them
later, could just
		
00:06:18 --> 00:06:21
			just to elaborate and add to what
multitap said, in terms of the
		
00:06:21 --> 00:06:23
			cost structure we had, you know,
we had
		
00:06:24 --> 00:06:28
			innumerable aims and objectives
and sections to do. And hamdullah,
		
00:06:28 --> 00:06:30
			we, we managed to do a lot of
them, but we weren't able to do
		
00:06:30 --> 00:06:34
			many of them, simply due to the
fact that we ran out of time in
		
00:06:34 --> 00:06:38
			some areas, but because we covered
topics in a lot of detail, it just
		
00:06:38 --> 00:06:41
			time ran out as such, but I try
numerate in terms of what we
		
00:06:41 --> 00:06:44
			actually did and in terms of what
topics inshallah we're gonna carry
		
00:06:44 --> 00:06:48
			on with. So areas that we
explored, were arguments for God.
		
00:06:48 --> 00:06:50
			So we looked at, you know, the
cosmological argument, the
		
00:06:50 --> 00:06:53
			ontological argument, the design
argument, we look at the whole
		
00:06:53 --> 00:06:56
			notion of the concept of God. So
what does it mean the word God?
		
00:06:56 --> 00:06:59
			Where is the concept behind that?
How do we equate? Or how do we
		
00:06:59 --> 00:07:02
			resolve the issue of omnipotence,
God's power, with reference to,
		
00:07:02 --> 00:07:06
			for example, paradoxes? Can God
create a stone that He cannot lift
		
00:07:06 --> 00:07:09
			himself? You've heard of that part
of 70? Or, for example, how do we
		
00:07:09 --> 00:07:13
			reconcile the issue of, you know,
God's in God's knowledge with the
		
00:07:13 --> 00:07:16
			issue of freewill, and so on and
so forth. So, we looked at the
		
00:07:16 --> 00:07:19
			arguments for God's existence, we
looked at arguments against God's
		
00:07:19 --> 00:07:22
			existence. So you know, atheists
have argument against God's
		
00:07:22 --> 00:07:26
			existence, they give all these
arguments, it is divine
		
00:07:26 --> 00:07:30
			hiddenness, if there is God, and
God is all loving, how come? Most
		
00:07:30 --> 00:07:33
			people don't recognize God or they
can't find God? Why is God hidden
		
00:07:33 --> 00:07:37
			in such a way? If there is God and
He is all powerful and all loving,
		
00:07:37 --> 00:07:44
			then why is there evil in the in
the universe as such, right, why
		
00:07:44 --> 00:07:47
			is it so much even so? So so we
looked at arguments for, we looked
		
00:07:47 --> 00:07:50
			at argument against and the
benefit of looking at those
		
00:07:50 --> 00:07:53
			particular areas and those themes
was primarily fed into Mufti sobs
		
00:07:53 --> 00:07:56
			theology section, because in the
theology texts that you look at
		
00:07:56 --> 00:08:00
			arguments for God's existence, you
look at God's attributes and so
		
00:08:00 --> 00:08:02
			forth. And we looked at this in
terms of a broader sense from, you
		
00:08:02 --> 00:08:05
			know, from a philosophy
perspective, so much of those
		
00:08:05 --> 00:08:09
			discussion about God's existence,
the concept, the attributes, a lot
		
00:08:09 --> 00:08:12
			of this stuff, if you go to
university, it will be, you know,
		
00:08:12 --> 00:08:16
			a full module in terms of a BA or
an MA course, but we, we started
		
00:08:16 --> 00:08:19
			with that, in order to provide a
foundation for multisoft course.
		
00:08:19 --> 00:08:22
			And then subsequently, after that,
we went to other areas related to
		
00:08:22 --> 00:08:24
			science and religion. We looked at
the whole issue of philosophy of
		
00:08:24 --> 00:08:27
			science, what is science? looked
at the whole issue of methodology
		
00:08:27 --> 00:08:30
			of science, induction deduction,
we looked at all these are
		
00:08:30 --> 00:08:33
			paradoxes. Then we looked at into
the case studies. Okay, so what's
		
00:08:33 --> 00:08:36
			the reconciliation of religion and
science? What are the different
		
00:08:36 --> 00:08:39
			paradigms? I know, everyone's
probably heard of Richard Dawkins
		
00:08:39 --> 00:08:42
			in this room, and our home and we
know Richard Dawkins is a very
		
00:08:42 --> 00:08:45
			famous proponent of the position
that science and religion are in
		
00:08:45 --> 00:08:48
			conflict. They call it the warfare
paradigm. But there are other
		
00:08:48 --> 00:08:52
			patterns as always, if you look at
article limin, they had an
		
00:08:52 --> 00:08:54
			integrationist paradigm with
science and religion. So we
		
00:08:54 --> 00:08:57
			explore different patterns of in
terms of science and how can
		
00:08:57 --> 00:09:00
			understand science and religion.
We looked at case studies, we
		
00:09:00 --> 00:09:02
			looked at evolution, a lot of
detail Subhanallah, we got about
		
00:09:02 --> 00:09:06
			at least nine hours on just
evolution in terms of exploring
		
00:09:06 --> 00:09:10
			where evolution was intelligent
design, looking at it from, you
		
00:09:10 --> 00:09:14
			know, the issue of problems within
it within the evidence is, so we
		
00:09:14 --> 00:09:16
			had two guest speakers with
regards to Asian Madonna, you
		
00:09:16 --> 00:09:19
			know, with man Ali, who basically
is doing loads of YouTube videos,
		
00:09:19 --> 00:09:22
			he put me on YouTube. He he
actually did about six hours and
		
00:09:22 --> 00:09:25
			again with Dr. mudra man who came
in and did you know, a whole
		
00:09:25 --> 00:09:28
			theological rejoinder. So we, we
put a lot of emphasis in terms of
		
00:09:28 --> 00:09:32
			those areas. We looked at quantum
mechanics. And then after that, we
		
00:09:32 --> 00:09:35
			looked at some areas which you
don't necessarily really explore
		
00:09:35 --> 00:09:39
			much at university, areas of
sociology, so how does socio
		
00:09:39 --> 00:09:42
			generally interact? How does
psychology and religion interact?
		
00:09:42 --> 00:09:45
			So everyone should be heard of,
you know, Freud? And everyone's
		
00:09:45 --> 00:09:47
			probably heard of, you know, some
of his psychological
		
00:09:47 --> 00:09:50
			psychoanalysis theory, but it has
a massive bearing on religion.
		
00:09:50 --> 00:09:54
			People don't appreciate that much
of the modern realm is based on
		
00:09:55 --> 00:09:59
			Freud's understanding of religion
as being a trauma. Yeah as being a
		
00:09:59 --> 00:10:00
			suffering that given
		
00:10:00 --> 00:10:03
			beings go through like a neurosis
or an illusion. We looked at the
		
00:10:03 --> 00:10:06
			whole issue of politics, as we
looked at Karl Marx, we looked at
		
00:10:06 --> 00:10:10
			the issue of ethics. So the
utilitarian principles, and so on
		
00:10:10 --> 00:10:13
			and so forth. So I'm chuckling a
lot of keywords here to you, but
		
00:10:13 --> 00:10:16
			we actually went through it very
systematically over a period of at
		
00:10:16 --> 00:10:20
			least 30 Odd weeks, until we broke
it down to different modules. So
		
00:10:20 --> 00:10:21
			what we've done this year,
inshallah we're hoping to
		
00:10:22 --> 00:10:26
			modularize everything in a more
succinct way. So that it provides
		
00:10:26 --> 00:10:28
			people the opportunity to come in
and do different types of modules,
		
00:10:28 --> 00:10:31
			like God's existence, God,
concept, science, religion, the
		
00:10:31 --> 00:10:35
			issue of, you know, sociology and
psychology. So that's mostly
		
00:10:35 --> 00:10:39
			subset, what's the point of this?
One is that we all have to go out
		
00:10:39 --> 00:10:43
			and did a day. I know many people
who have, you know, advanced
		
00:10:43 --> 00:10:45
			degrees in Islamic studies, but
there are always going to be
		
00:10:45 --> 00:10:47
			doubts until today, and this is
probably mine anyway to have
		
00:10:47 --> 00:10:50
			doubts. So it's for personal
satisfaction in terms of being
		
00:10:50 --> 00:10:53
			able to provide a rational answer
to yourself to the best that you
		
00:10:53 --> 00:10:56
			can do. And we know in our
tradition, not all answers are
		
00:10:56 --> 00:10:58
			rational. Sometimes we leave it to
the realms of the gap where we
		
00:10:58 --> 00:11:02
			don't know. But not all questions
are lifted again. So God's
		
00:11:02 --> 00:11:04
			existence is not a question that
is, well Hamdulillah. We leave it
		
00:11:04 --> 00:11:07
			to Allah, I believe in Allah
because Allah said, so is this how
		
00:11:07 --> 00:11:09
			our scholars argue this,
		
00:11:10 --> 00:11:12
			find maybe some questions about
God's attributes or questions of
		
00:11:12 --> 00:11:14
			the gap. But there are many
questions that we can give
		
00:11:14 --> 00:11:18
			evidence for. So one is personal
satisfaction, personal
		
00:11:18 --> 00:11:21
			satisfaction of the beliefs that
we hold that and actually, I
		
00:11:21 --> 00:11:24
			forgot to mention, we actually had
this whole section on Islam as
		
00:11:24 --> 00:11:26
			well, in terms of, you know,
looking at miracles, what is the
		
00:11:26 --> 00:11:30
			miracle of Islam? Why is Islam
true and not Christianity, or, for
		
00:11:30 --> 00:11:33
			example, Judaism, and we'll start
off Roku is an expert in terms of,
		
00:11:33 --> 00:11:36
			you know, Arabic Bulava. He went
through the whole issue of the
		
00:11:36 --> 00:11:38
			Arabic language looked into the
issue of you know, the Quranic
		
00:11:38 --> 00:11:42
			miracle, the linguistic miracle
miracle that that aspect, I think,
		
00:11:42 --> 00:11:45
			was this upset, you are going to
touch on it to see course. That's
		
00:11:45 --> 00:11:48
			something that's not discussed
very often, you get discussions of
		
00:11:48 --> 00:11:52
			Quran and science, Quran and in
terms of prophecies are very
		
00:11:52 --> 00:11:55
			rarely do you get the Quranic
miracle as Allah has articulated
		
00:11:55 --> 00:11:58
			himself, which is the linguistic
miracle, Allah is challenged,
		
00:11:58 --> 00:12:01
			doesn't it? And we talked about
that as well in terms of those
		
00:12:01 --> 00:12:04
			miracle aspects. So personal
satisfaction is one issue. But
		
00:12:04 --> 00:12:07
			then obviously, as all Amma, as
you know, in a move to so and so
		
00:12:07 --> 00:12:11
			forth, people come. Obviously,
we're you know, people are in
		
00:12:11 --> 00:12:13
			charge of flux and communities.
And there are people who are going
		
00:12:13 --> 00:12:16
			to come and they want solutions
and answers. And if they can't
		
00:12:16 --> 00:12:19
			find solution and answer from the
Allama, then end of the day, it
		
00:12:19 --> 00:12:22
			somehow brings shuba heart into
them in terms of the whole
		
00:12:22 --> 00:12:25
			religion. Because an alum
animosity is a representation of
		
00:12:25 --> 00:12:28
			religion. That's what he is, or
she is, they can't provide a
		
00:12:28 --> 00:12:31
			cogent answer than that somehow.
And this is incorrect. It's
		
00:12:31 --> 00:12:34
			fallacious fallacious reasoning,
but somehow, you know, for that
		
00:12:34 --> 00:12:37
			individuals who asked that
question, know what the answer, it
		
00:12:37 --> 00:12:39
			really breaks down that religion.
You think to yourself this
		
00:12:39 --> 00:12:43
			religion has no answers if this is
what these people have, so as to
		
00:12:43 --> 00:12:47
			provide our community who are
suffering now. So many people out
		
00:12:47 --> 00:12:52
			there have some issue had so many
Shabbat, they have so many doubts.
		
00:12:52 --> 00:12:54
			There's so many issues only
yesterday, I was watching a video
		
00:12:54 --> 00:12:57
			about transgenderism and so on and
so forth. How do we deal with that
		
00:12:57 --> 00:13:01
			in terms of Islam? gender
fluidity, most schools are now
		
00:13:01 --> 00:13:05
			going to be happening. You know
how having unisex toilets was
		
00:13:05 --> 00:13:07
			Islamic perspective on that, how
do you irrational Arthur Robinson?
		
00:13:08 --> 00:13:11
			In a blasphemy, Allah Allahu
Akbar, or something's, you know,
		
00:13:11 --> 00:13:14
			silly that is equated to Islam?
How do you get a rational cogent
		
00:13:14 --> 00:13:18
			answer which Islam gives? So
hamdulillah those kind of areas,
		
00:13:18 --> 00:13:21
			we discuss some of them inocula.
The terminology can be difficult,
		
00:13:21 --> 00:13:23
			but Hamdulillah this is something
that we're going to be working on
		
00:13:23 --> 00:13:26
			this year to make sure that we
start at a very basic level build
		
00:13:26 --> 00:13:27
			you up.
		
00:13:28 --> 00:13:31
			We have Google classroom as well,
in terms of the FFC program, we
		
00:13:31 --> 00:13:34
			had loads of stuff on that, we'll
start off rook was answering lots
		
00:13:34 --> 00:13:36
			of questions. So we have a lot of
interaction as well in terms of
		
00:13:36 --> 00:13:38
			those issues. So you're not
basically coming to lectures and
		
00:13:38 --> 00:13:42
			you're left to your own devices.
There's a lot of interaction in
		
00:13:42 --> 00:13:44
			terms of if you want to know
answers you want explore things
		
00:13:44 --> 00:13:47
			further. There's a lot of
resources we provide. So we did it
		
00:13:47 --> 00:13:51
			last year, it went okay, I would
say we're trying to optimize it
		
00:13:51 --> 00:13:54
			inshallah make it better. But as
much as I say, it's very useful
		
00:13:54 --> 00:13:57
			course, in those issues in terms
of personal as well as data
		
00:13:57 --> 00:13:59
			purposes in terms of positive
Dawa, where we can possibly go out
		
00:13:59 --> 00:14:03
			and give dower and negative data
in terms of negating those things
		
00:14:03 --> 00:14:06
			about the range of Islam, those
kind of controversial things also
		
00:14:06 --> 00:14:08
			have to be things that aren't
necessarily, you know, not always
		
00:14:08 --> 00:14:13
			dealt with, or just not Bucha. But
yeah, later, you know, that's, and
		
00:14:13 --> 00:14:16
			that's sometimes the other right
lever sometimes, yeah, but not
		
00:14:16 --> 00:14:19
			everything can be left, sometimes,
there are many things that
		
00:14:19 --> 00:14:21
			shouldn't be left, and if they're
left, and they cause major doubts,
		
00:14:22 --> 00:14:25
			so a positive activities abishola,
just like we're not here for that.
		
00:14:25 --> 00:14:31
			So the half, which is related to
more the philosophical aspects,
		
00:14:31 --> 00:14:35
			not not the classical Arabic text.
But what was starting runs on
		
00:14:35 --> 00:14:39
			that. That was also you could just
take that separately, which is
		
00:14:39 --> 00:14:42
			called a faith foundation. That's
what it was called the faith
		
00:14:42 --> 00:14:45
			foundations course. And again,
we're going to make it into
		
00:14:45 --> 00:14:47
			module. So if you can't take the
whole course for the whole year,
		
00:14:47 --> 00:14:51
			you could take one module, the
science module or the the theology
		
00:14:51 --> 00:14:55
			module, you know, it'll be it'll
be on the site very soon if you
		
00:14:55 --> 00:14:56
			don't want to take the whole
course.
		
00:14:58 --> 00:14:59
			I just want to mention, I mean,
what we'll start
		
00:15:00 --> 00:15:03
			Uh, Imran mentioned he mentioned a
number of names, you know whether
		
00:15:03 --> 00:15:07
			that be Karl Marx Popper, Freud,
Kant, right? These are the Western
		
00:15:07 --> 00:15:11
			prophets, basically. I mean,
Europe hasn't had a profit, right?
		
00:15:11 --> 00:15:14
			I don't think there's any profit.
I mean,
		
00:15:15 --> 00:15:18
			there's no profit that was sent to
Europe, God knows best Allah knows
		
00:15:18 --> 00:15:20
			best, really, but there's no
history of them. So they've
		
00:15:20 --> 00:15:22
			imported Jesus peace be upon him.
		
00:15:23 --> 00:15:26
			And then there's the Judeo, and
then there's the Muslims have come
		
00:15:26 --> 00:15:27
			in. But
		
00:15:28 --> 00:15:33
			in terms of the so called modern
prophets, right, in that sense,
		
00:15:34 --> 00:15:37
			then you've got these famous
thinkers. Now, the average person
		
00:15:37 --> 00:15:40
			on the street, or the person who's
writing the article, or the person
		
00:15:40 --> 00:15:44
			who's giving the interview, was
critiquing Islam, or, or trying to
		
00:15:44 --> 00:15:46
			push a certain
		
00:15:47 --> 00:15:50
			agenda or a certain idea of
feminism or whatever, they're
		
00:15:50 --> 00:15:53
			never going to say that this is a
feminist idea, or that this is
		
00:15:54 --> 00:15:57
			empiricism, or this is science,
oh, well, science in my use, but
		
00:15:58 --> 00:15:59
			or they may never call it
		
00:16:00 --> 00:16:05
			hermeneutics or whatever, these,
they may never even have to quote
		
00:16:05 --> 00:16:09
			Freud, or Kant, or Marx, or
anybody else, you know, if it's an
		
00:16:09 --> 00:16:14
			issue of sociology, they will just
provide the idea. It's actually
		
00:16:15 --> 00:16:20
			it's ingrained, right? It's, it's
like the way Muslims will speak
		
00:16:20 --> 00:16:24
			about Islamic issues, without
necessarily quoting, because it's
		
00:16:24 --> 00:16:29
			so common, it's become common
nomenclature, right, it's become
		
00:16:29 --> 00:16:34
			common terminology, common ideas.
So they won't even know that this
		
00:16:34 --> 00:16:37
			actually comes from Freud, or that
this comes from Kant, or this is,
		
00:16:37 --> 00:16:41
			you know, an idea that's based in
whether you call it
		
00:16:41 --> 00:16:45
			existentialism, or whatever the
case is, but they this is what the
		
00:16:45 --> 00:16:49
			Western idea is based on. And if
we don't know what it's based on,
		
00:16:50 --> 00:16:55
			then it's very difficult to try to
attack it. Because what we're
		
00:16:55 --> 00:16:58
			doing here in this course, is you
take the idea, and then we show
		
00:16:58 --> 00:17:02
			the criticisms against it, both
from a Western perspective, and
		
00:17:02 --> 00:17:04
			from an Islamic perspective, and
that's very interesting. All of
		
00:17:04 --> 00:17:07
			these ideas, they've actually been
critiqued by Westerners
		
00:17:07 --> 00:17:11
			themselves, right, other
scientists, I mean, other
		
00:17:11 --> 00:17:14
			thinkers, so we're showing how
they're critiqued. And then we can
		
00:17:15 --> 00:17:18
			we can say okay, this is the maybe
the Muslim were the Islamic way of
		
00:17:18 --> 00:17:19
			looking at it.
		
00:17:21 --> 00:17:26
			So don't get put off by the big
names and the big ideas on all
		
00:17:26 --> 00:17:30
			that because we have to we have to
understand them and then be able
		
00:17:30 --> 00:17:33
			to inshallah deal with what's
going on outside.
		
00:17:34 --> 00:17:36
			I want to move on to the last
course